Background
In November 2022, the global population reached 8 billion, of which the proportion of people aged 65 and over is expected to rise from 10% in 2022 to 16% in 2050 [
1]. According to
the 2023 China Statistical Yearbook, there are 210 million people over the age of 65, accounting for 14.9% of the total population [
2]. This aging process has resulted in a rise in chronic conditions, disabilities, and handicaps. In 2022, the number of practicing physicians in China was only 4.22 million, which has led to an attempt to delegate prescribing rights from physicians to nurses [
2].
Nurse prescribing right is the right of nurses to prescribe effective treatment for patients’ health issues in nursing practice [
3]. In general, the right to prescribe has always been the preserve of physicians. In 1971, to address inadequate medical resources and increase patient access to health care, Idaho became the first state in the United States to allow legislation for nurse prescribing rights [
4]. Over the past 20 years, nurse prescribing rights have become very common in many countries, such as the United Kingdom, the United States, and Australia [
5]. In September 2021, the International Council of Nurses formulated the world’s first
Guidelines on prescriptive Authority for Nurses, and 44 countries or regions worldwide have formulated formal laws and regulations granting nurse prescribing rights [
6]. In 2018, Anhui Province took the lead in piloting nurse prescribing rights, which provided experience in developing nurse prescribing rights in China [
7]. In 2022, medical regulations in the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone grant specialist nurses the right to prescribe [
8], indicating the gradual development of nurse prescribing rights in China.
Nurses have the most contact with patients and often find the changes of patients’ conditions in the first time. Nurses have the rights to prescribe and can assume part of the role of physicians, which helps physicians have enough time to deal with difficult diseases and realize the efficient allocation of medical resources [
9]. More importantly, nurses have the rights to prescribe, which can provide nurses with a new career direction and promote the development of nursing discipline [
10]. However, the advancement of the nurse prescribing role encounters various obstacles, such as the attitude of physicians, the integrity of laws, and so on, with the negative attitude of physicians being the most prominent barrier [
11,
12]. In previous studies, the results of physicians’ attitudes toward nurse prescribing rights differed, and some showed that physicians supported nurse prescribing rights [
5,
13]. The results of the study by Abbey Hyde et al. [
14] showed that it was safe for nurses to prescribe ionizing radiation. The positive attitudes of physicians play an important role in expanding the range of prescriptions that nurses can prescribe. However, some studies showed that physicians were opposed to nurses having the right to prescribe. Reasons cited for their opposition include the inadequate knowledge of nurses [
15], the uncertain purpose of nurse prescribing rights [
16], and so on. To our knowledge, no prior study has investigated Chinese physicians’ attitudes toward nurse prescribing rights. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the attitudes of Chinese physicians toward nurse prescribing rights.
The practical objectives of this study were to (1) explore the attitudes of physicians toward nurse prescribing rights, and (2) explore the factors correlated to physicians’ attitudes toward nurses prescribing rights.
Methods
Study design
The present research was conducted in Beijing, Tianjin, Guangdong, Hebei, Henan, Heilongjiang, Shandong, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Zhejiang provinces in China from January to March 2024 using the cross-sectional study design. We carried out this study using the STROBE checklist [
17].
Sample and sampling method
Based on the sample size calculation principle used in Kendall’s cross-sectional investigation, it was determined that the required sample size should be five to ten times the independent variable [
18]. In this study, the independent variables included demographic information, the questions about knowledge of nurse prescribing rights, and the nurse-physician collaboration scale (three subscales). Assuming an anticipated non-response rate of 30%, a sample size of 72 individuals was deemed necessary. In this study, 165 physicians were sampled using the convenience sampling method. The inclusion criteria for this study were physicians who were licensed to practice medicine and willing to participate. The exclusion criteria were retired physicians or not engaged in clinical practice. Physicians with nurses in their family were also excluded from the study because they might want their families to have good career prospects, which could bias the results. In the end, 112 physicians were included in the study.
Some studies have shown that the attitudes of physicians may be related to social factors, knowledge of nurse prescribing rights, and partnerships between physicians and nurses [
13,
16]. Therefore, we selected the demographic information form, the questions about knowledge of nurse prescribing rights, and the nurse-physician collaboration scale to investigate the attitudes of physicians toward nurse prescribing rights. This study was conducted using the question, “What is your attitude toward nurses’ rights to prescribe?” To know the attitude of the physician. The physician may answer “support " or “oppose”.
Demographic information form included sex, work experience, age, level of education, hospital grade, professional title, and average monthly family income.
The knowledge of nurse prescribing rights was six general questions in
Expert Consensus on Content of Prescription Rights of Nurses in Mew Era [
19]. The six questions were “Which description is an independent prescription?” “Whether the applicant for the nurse prescribing rights have working experience in a tertiary hospital?” “Whether the applicant for the nurse prescribing rights have a bachelor’s degree?” “Whether the applicant for the nurse prescribing rights have more than 5 years of clinical work experience?” “Whether the applicant for the nurse prescribing rights have the title of chief nurse?” “Whether the applicant for the nurse prescribing rights have a nurse prescription for salbutamol?” The first question was a multiple-choice question, with 1 point for correct answers and 0 points for wrong answers. Other questions were scored as yes (score 1) or no (score 0). This section’s reliability was assessed and confirmed using the test-retest method (
r = 0.853).
The nurse-physician collaboration scale was developed by Ushiro Rei [
20] and translated by Liao Chunli et al. [
21] to evaluate the nurse-physician partnership. The scale comprises three distinct dimensions, namely joint participation in the cure/care decision-making process (12 items), sharing of patient information (8 items) and cooperativeness (7 items). This scale is assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (never) to 5 (always) points. The total score of scale spans a range of 27 to 125 points, wherein a higher score corresponds to a higher frequency of collaborative activity. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for this scale was determined to be 0.96, which confirmed its reliability.
Data collection method
The researchers provided participants with a concise explanation of the research objectives and methods and proceeded with conducting the survey through the distribution of both paper and electronic questionnaires (e.g., E-mail, Wechat). The researchers analyzed 165 data and excluded 53 questionnaires that were clearly logically inaccurate, incomplete data, and did not meet the criteria. Finally, 112 physicians were included in this study.
Statistical analysis
The data analysis was conducted using SPSS.21. Demographic information was described using mean ± standard deviation, frequencies and percentages. Our study used the T-test, Chi-square test to analyze the differences in physicians’ attitudes based on demographic characteristics. In addition, we use merge classification or Fisher’s exact test for variables whose expected value is less than five in the Chi-square test to process the data. A binary logistic regression was used to analyze the factors correlated with physicians’ attitudes toward nurse prescribing rights. The p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Discussion
The present cross-sectional study was performed to explore physicians’ attitudes toward nurse prescribing rights and its correlated factors. The study included 112 physicians. They come not from one province but from Beijing, Tianjin, Guangdong, Hebei, Henan, Heilongjiang, Shandong, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Zhejiang provinces. Therefore, the results of this study have a certain regional representation and universality.
However, the findings indicate that the majority of physicians have a positive attitude toward nurse prescribing rights. The findings align with the study results reported by Karen Stenner et al. [
22]. Although prescribing had always been a tradition for physicians, in some countries where prescribing was permitted, they had regulated the conditions for nurses to prescribe and ensured patients safety through physicians supervision and other measures [
23], which lessened the resistance of physicians to nurses having the right to prescribe. The study by Saija Koskiniemi et al. [
24] found that providing knowledge of nursing for patients at prescription appointments with nurses could potentially lead to cost savings with fewer readmissions. According to a previous study, patients were just as or more satisfied with the treatment received from nurses with the right to prescribe medication than that from physicians [
25]. In addition, physicians’ positive attitudes toward prescribing could promote the development of nurse prescribing rights. Prescribing was thought to improve nurses’ ability to promote evidence-based practice [
26]. The results of the study by Roisin Lennon et al. [
27] demonstrated the positive impact of nurse prescribing rights on patients and its role in elevating the standard of medication prescribing. According to the prescribers, this arose from the complete episode of safe and improved service delivery that they brought to their caseload of patients. Regarding those nurses who wrote the prescriptions, it was both appropriate and within the limits of their competence to prescribe for patients [
28].
The study results showed that physicians had a high score in nurse-physician collaboration. Consistent with our findings, a study by Shu Chunmei et al. [
29] conducted in China, it was reported that the nurse-physician collaboration in tertiary hospitals was also at a good level. Nurse-physician collaboration refers to the process in which physicians and nurses make joint decisions to provide treatment and nursing for patients on the premise of equality, autonomy, mutual respect, and trust in each other’s knowledge and ability [
30]. Through good cooperation between physicians and nurses, working time could be saved, and the pressure on physicians and nurses could be reduced. In addition, previous studies [
31,
32] have shown that active nurse-physician collaboration could reduce the incidence of mortality, complications, and adverse prognosis in patients. Since good nurse-physician collaboration can dramatically improve patient care, it is necessary to strengthen the establishment of nurse-physician partnerships.
Our findings revealed that the score of knowledge about nurse prescribing rights was medium. However, this was inconsistent with the findings of Hamidreza Haririan et al. [
13], which showed that physicians had a relatively high knowledge of nurse prescribing rights. This could be related to the short time that nurse prescribing rights were introduced into China from abroad. Currently, China has no laws and regulations to support and manage nurse prescribing rights at the national level. The prescription by specialist nurses could provide patients with more comprehensive and high-quality medical and health services [
33]. If the National Health Commission begins looking into the implementation of a certification system to grant nurse prescribing rights to specialist nurses, in that case, we believe that this will not only increase public awareness of nurse prescribing rights but also promote the development of nurse prescribing rights in China.
This study identified several factors, including sex, nurse-physician collaboration and knowledge of nurse prescribing rights, that were correlated with physicians’ attitudes toward nurse prescribing rights. In the study, female physicians were opposed to nurse prescribing rights. For female physicians, male physicians were more likely to be satisfied with their jobs, and nurse prescribing rights could have a further impact on the status of female physicians and produce more dissatisfaction with their work [
34], which could be the reason why female physicians were reluctant to support nurse prescribing rights. Nurse-physician collaboration was an important factor in promoting the development of nurse prescribing rights [
9]. Therefore, handling the nurse-physician partnership would make it easier for physicians to accept the right of nurses to prescribe. We suggest that nurses seek guidance from physicians when making prescriptions and that physicians periodically evaluate and offer input on nurses’ prescriptions. This practice will not only enhance nurses’ confidence in their work but also guarantee the safety of their prescriptions. Therefore, we propose to strengthen media publicity, popularize knowledge about nurse prescribing rights to the public through newspapers, the internet, television, etc., and increase physician awareness of nurse prescribing rights [
35]. Consequently, this will also help to reduce the resistance of physicians to the right of nurses to prescribe. Similarly, it will also help to reduce the resistance of physicians to the right of nurses to prescribe.
Limitations
This study had some limitations due to the cross-sectional study design. Firstly, the study design was unable to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between the variables investigated. Longitudinal studies will be conducted to further explore the causal relationship. Secondly, the sample size of this study is small. Since our team had no contacts in the provinces not surveyed, no nationwide survey was conducted. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out large-scale and multi-regional research in the future.
Recommendations for future research
We recommend a longitudinal study with a large sample based on the distribution of hospital physicians across the country, using random stratified sampling, to investigate how physicians’ attitudes toward nurses’ prescribing rights change over time. It is recommended that qualitative study be used to identify the underlying factors that correlated with physicians’ attitudes toward nurses’ prescribing rights to provide a theoretical basis for future intervention research.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.