Background
Prescription drug misuse (defined as the independent use of prescription drugs without or beyond a doctor’s prescription) has been identified as a global issue of concern [1]. Of the estimated 59 million-plus Americans who use illicit drugs, 16 million are estimated to misuse prescription drugs [2]. Prescription drug misuse has increased over the past 15 years in the United States, contributing to a 500% increase in drug overdose-related deaths [3, 4]. Prescription pain medications are the second most misused group of drugs after cannabis [5]. Prescription drug misuse has been linked to increased emergency room visits, overdose deaths, and addiction treatment admissions [6‐8]. Prescription drug misuse places an additional burden on individuals and society due to its association with illicit drug use and alcohol use disorders [9]; it has been shown to lead to the use of heroin and other injected drugs [10].
Healthcare professionals face potential exposure to the risk of prescription drug misuse [11‐14]. Easy access to medications due to the nature of their job can increase healthcare workers’ vulnerability to prescription drug abuse or misuse [11]. Among healthcare professionals, anesthesia care providers are more likely to develop a substance use disorder than others due to the relatively easy drug access and independent nature of their tasks [12]. In a Dutch study, physicians tended to misuse prescription drugs more than non-physicians [13]. A recent study reported that more nurses misused prescription-type drugs compared with the general population (9.9% vs. 5.9%) [14]. The prevalence of prescription drug misuse among healthcare professionals, especially nurses who frequently interact with patients, is a significant cause for concern, highlighting the need to thoroughly investigate the multiple factors contributing to prescription drug misuse by nurses.
Anzeige
At the environmental level, work-related factors that might be associated with prescription drug misuse among nurses include high accessibility in the workplace, specifically perceived ease of availability, frequent administration, and poor workplace control [15]. A U.S. study reported that nurses were prone to misuse prescription medications such as amphetamines, opioids, sedatives, and tranquilizers, which are easily accessible in their workplaces [15]. Lack of proper monitoring of controlled medications in hospitals and other care settings poses an occupational hazard for nurses [16]. Nurses’ prescription drug misuse has been linked to personal health issues and impaired nursing care [15, 17]. The deliberate illegal distribution of regulated drugs (i.e., drug diversion) has also been noted as an issue among nurses in the United States [11].
At the individual level, burnout should be considered as a potentially influential factor affecting nurses’ prescription drug misuse. Burnout, defined as prolonged emotional stress leading to physical and mental fatigue, has been shown to have a significant impact on nurses’ well-being and coping mechanisms [18, 19]. The demanding nature of their work, irregular shifts, and exposure to traumatic events create an environment ripe for burnout. The chronic stress experienced by nurses may increase the likelihood of their using substances, including prescription drugs, as a way of coping with emotional and mental distress [17].
In Western countries, research efforts have studied the prevalence, etiological factors, and estimated outcomes of nurses’ prescription drug misuse [15]. However, in South Korea, although prescription drug misuse has been investigated in limited studies (e.g., in older persons [20]), there is a lack of research on nurses’ prescription drug misuse. Overseas research may not be generalizable to the Korean context because drug use in South Korea and North America, in general, are quite different; drug use in Asian countries is regarded as a crime rather than a public health problem [21]. According to the latest cross-national report [22], the most recently available data on the prevalence of drug use in Korea, which was collected almost 20 years ago (2004), showed relatively low levels of misuse when compared with 2020 U.S. data: cannabis (0.29% of the population), amphetamines (0.12%), and opioids (0.08%) in Korea vs. cannabis (21.9%), amphetamines (5.65%), and opioids (2.9%) in the United States.
In relation to the high turnover rate among nurses in South Korea, which is about threefold that of other professions (14.5% in 2021), extreme workload and stress levels have been reported as important contributing factors [23‐25]. In such circumstances, Korean nurses may be more prone to ignoring their personal health issues or resorting to prescription drug misuse. Therefore, there is an alarming need for research on prescription drug misuse to explore avenues for enhancing the well-being and safety of nurses. As there are no available data or research about prescription drug misuse among Korean nurses, our study was conducted to address this research gap. This study explored the level of nurses’ prescription drug misuse and examined the effects of workplace access and burnout on prescription drug misuse.
Anzeige
Methods
Study design
This study employed a quantitative cross-sectional descriptive design. By employing quantitative methods, this study aims to investigate the level of nurses’ prescription drug misuse and examine the effects of workplace access and burnout on prescription drug misuse. We hypothesized that high workplace access and high burnout would be associated with prescription drug misuse among hospital nurses.
Study setting
This research was part of the Nursing Teamwork Study, designed to assess the work-related and personal characteristics of nurses and their association with nurses’ health outcomes. Anonymous survey data were collected online through a Korean mobile application.
Population
In line with our research objectives, the target population consisted of experienced nurses working in hospital settings. We included registered nurses [1] who were currently working in hospital settings (e.g., tertiary, long-term care (LTC)/specialty, hospital clinics) with at least 6 months of work experience, and [2] who provided consent to participate in the study.
Sampling and sample size
Our study recruited Korean hospital nurses through a widely used mobile app via convenience sampling. When conducting a power analysis using G*Power 3.1.9.7 (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany), our regression analysis was expected to have data from at least 399 subjects [15]. Our sample size exceeded the minimum requirement, potentially enhancing the accuracy and reliability of the study findings.
Data collection
Data collection took place in May 2021. Study participants were enlisted through the utilization of ‘My Duty,’ a mobile application used by roughly 85% of Korean nurses. Those currently using the application were extended an invitation to participate in the survey directly through the mobile platform and were able to proceed upon granting consent.
Measures
Prescription drug misuse
Prescription drug misuse in the past year was asked using this single item: “How often have you used the following prescription drugs without a doctor’s prescription in the past year?”, which was adapted from the U.S. national survey on drug use and health [26]. The item has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, e.g., good reliability (kappa 0.65–0.85) and content validity among nurses [15, 27].
For the specific types of prescription drugs, we referred to the substance use items from the Nurses’ Worklife and Wellness Study (NWWS) [14]. Considering the cultural differences between the two countries, we substituted the NWWS misuse items (benzodiazepines, opiates, non-narcotic pain relievers, and stimulants) with frequently misused prescription medications in the general Korean population [28‐31]. A list of six types of prescription drugs was provided as follows: IV drips (glucose, normal saline, Hartmann’s solution), pain relievers, antibiotics, sleeping pills, steroids, and appetite suppressants. Participants were informed that the drugs listed in the survey questionnaire were prescription-type drugs, not over-the-counter drugs that can be purchased at supermarkets or pharmacies. The response options were 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = once every 6 months, 4 = once a month, 5 = once a week, and 6 = daily. Based on prior drug-related research, we aggregated the responses into two groups to prioritize the presence or absence of the behavior over its frequency: yes (2 = rarely to 6 = daily), which indicated any use reported last year, or no (1 = never) [15, 32, 33].
Accessibility of drugs in the workplace
For our investigation of the accessibility of drugs in the workplace, we used the NWWS items, which cover two dimensions: frequency of administration and perceived availability. These showed good construct and content validity in a nurse population (e.g., factor loadings 0.86 to 0.89) [15]. To assess the frequency of administration of the six medication types, nurses were asked, “How often do you administer the following drugs to patients in your work?” with a 4-point response option of 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, and 4 = often. We then aggregated the responses into three groups: never, rarely/sometimes, or often [15]. To assess the perceived availability of the six medication types, nurses were asked, “How easy is it to get the following drugs from your workplace for your own purposes?” with response options ranging from 1 = very difficult, 2 = difficult, 3 = easy, and 4 = very easy.
Burnout
Burnout was assessed using the Korean version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (K-CBI) [34, 35]. The K-CBI comprises 19 items assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = never/almost never, 2 = rarely, 3 = occasionally, 4 = frequently, 5 = always). Scale scores were computed as the average value of the items, with higher scores indicating increased burnout levels. The K-CBI has demonstrated acceptable content and construct validity along with good internal consistency reliability among Korean nurses [36]. In our sample, the K-CBI was shown to be reliable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94).
Data analysis
SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R, version 4.3.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), were used for statistical analyses. To explore the level of nurses’ prescription drug misuse and workplace access, frequencies and percentages were calculated. The level of burnout was evaluated using its mean and standard deviation. To examine the effects of workplace access and burnout on prescription drug misuse, logistic regression models were created. For the statistical analysis, we inspected the assumptions of the regression analysis. Firstly, the observations were independent, as the data were collected online from non-overlapping individuals without nested features. Secondly, no significant collinearity among the variables was found (all VIF values < 1.30). Lastly, visual inspection of the data revealed no outliers. Logistic regression models were adjusted for potential confounders of personal characteristics such as age and gender. Variables with an odds ratio (OR) exceeding 1 signified an increased likelihood of misusing prescription drugs. We hypothesized that workplace access and burnout would have odds ratios higher than 1 for prescription drug misuse. The significance level was set at 95%.
To quantitatively evaluate the relative importance of explanatory variables for nurses’ prescription drug misuse, Shapley values were computed [37]. By measuring each variable’s contribution to the model’s prediction, Shapley values offer insights into how individual variables influence the overall prediction. Global Shapley plots visually summarize variable importance in a predictive model, with longer bars indicating higher average Shapley values and showcasing the features’ impact on predictions. Positive or negative extensions reveal the direction of influence. Comparing bar lengths helps rank features, offering insights into their relative importance and interaction effects.
Ethical considerations
This research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chung-Ang University (IRB No. 1041078-202203-HR-114). This research adhered to guidelines and standards. Participation in this study was voluntary, and informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants. After providing an introduction and explanation about the study aims and procedures, only nurses who confirmed their eligibility and agreement to participate in the study voluntarily accessed the online survey.
Anzeige
Results
Sample characteristics
Out of 1901 individuals who accessed the study link, 1759 consented to participate in the study, and among them, 1160 completed the survey (response rate = 61%). Subsequently, 18 respondents were further excluded for the following reasons: not a registered nurse (n = 1), less than 6 months of experience (n = 3), and not working in hospital settings (n = 14), resulting in a final sample of 1142 nurses. Sociodemographic and work characteristics of the sample are presented elsewhere [38]. Briefly, the nurse participants were predominantly female (93.5%) with a mean age of 29 years, and the majority of them were not married (82.0%). The most common specialty was general wards (e.g., adult care such as medical-surgical) (60.5%), followed by intensive care unit (ICU)/neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (18.8%) and emergency room (ER) (7.4%). Most nurses worked on a rotating schedule, including night shifts (87.7%); 2% of them worked only night shifts. The average level of burnout among the nurses was 3.26 (SD = 0.77, range 1–5).
Prescription drug misuse among nurses
Pain relievers (44.2%), IV drips (glucose, normal saline, Hartmann’s solution) (26.8%), and antibiotics (13.5%) were the most misused types of drugs (Table 1), with sleeping pills (8.1%), steroids (8.1%), and appetite suppressants (5.4%) less commonly misused.
Table 1
Frequency of prescription drug misusea among nurses in the past year
Type of Medication | n | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
IV drips | yes | 306 | 26.8 |
no | 836 | 73.2 | |
Pain relievers | yes | 505 | 44.2 |
no | 637 | 55.8 | |
Antibiotics | yes | 154 | 13.5 |
no | 988 | 86.5 | |
Sleeping pills | yes | 93 | 8.1 |
no | 1049 | 91.9 | |
Steroids | yes | 93 | 8.1 |
no | 1049 | 91.9 | |
Appetite suppressants | yes | 62 | 5.4 |
no | 1080 | 94.6 |
Accessibility to drugs at the workplace
Most nurses reported frequently administering IV drips (84.8% reported often), pain relievers (80.1%), and antibiotics (80.0%) in their workplace (Table 2). Nurses perceived that IV drips (68.3%), pain relievers (66.5%), and antibiotics (40.4%) were easily accessible at the workplace if they sought them for their own use.
Anzeige
Table 2
Accessibility to prescription drugs at the workplace
Frequency of administrationa | n | % | Perceived availabilityb | n | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IV drips | Often | 968 | 84.8 | IV drips | Very easy | 365 | 32.0 |
Rarely/Sometimes | 110 | 9.6 | Easy | 415 | 36.3 | ||
Never | 64 | 5.6 | Difficult | 178 | 15.6 | ||
Very difficult | 184 | 16.1 | |||||
Pain relievers | Often | 915 | 80.1 | Pain relievers | Very easy | 265 | 23.2 |
Rarely/Sometimes | 180 | 15.8 | Easy | 495 | 43.3 | ||
Never | 47 | 4.1 | Difficult | 196 | 17.2 | ||
Very difficult | 186 | 16.3 | |||||
Antibiotics | Often | 914 | 80.0 | Antibiotics | Very easy | 166 | 14.5 |
Rarely/Sometimes | 147 | 12.9 | Easy | 296 | 25.9 | ||
Never | 81 | 7.1 | Difficult | 278 | 24.3 | ||
Very difficult | 402 | 35.2 | |||||
Sleeping pills | Often | 430 | 33.7 | Sleeping pills | Very easy | 44 | 3.9 |
Rarely/Sometimes | 556 | 48.7 | Easy | 186 | 16.3 | ||
Never | 156 | 13.7 | Difficult | 326 | 28.5 | ||
Very difficult | 586 | 51.3 | |||||
Steroids | Often | 420 | 36.8 | Steroids | Very easy | 93 | 8.1 |
Rarely/Sometimes | 578 | 50.6 | Easy | 230 | 20.1 | ||
Never | 144 | 12.6 | Difficult | 345 | 30.2 | ||
Very difficult | 474 | 41.5 | |||||
Appetite suppressants | Often | 23 | 2.0 | Appetite suppressants | Very easy | 18 | 1.6 |
Rarely/Sometimes | 174 | 15.2 | Easy | 80 | 7.0 | ||
Never | 945 | 82.7 | Difficult | 278 | 24.3 | ||
Very difficult | 766 | 67.1 | |||||
Effects of workplace accessibility and burnout with nurses’ prescription drug misuse
Logistic regression analysis revealed that perceived availability was significantly related to all types of prescription drug misuse (Table 3). For example, nurses who reported that it was very easy to obtain IV drips for personal use in the workplace had 9.91 times higher odds of misusing IV drips compared to those who found it very difficult (OR = 9.91, CI = 5.16–19.06). Frequency of administration was significantly associated with IV drips, pain relievers, and appetite suppressants: nurses who often administer IV drips were three times more likely to misuse IV drips than nurses who do not administer IV drips (OR = 3.00, CI = 1.16–7.80). The odds of misuse among nurses who often administered appetite suppressants were 3.79 times higher than among those who never administered appetite suppressants (OR = 3.79, CI = 1.18–12.13).
Burnout was significantly associated with IV drips, sleeping pills, and steroids. Nurses were 38%, 62%, and 53% more likely to misuse IV drips, sleeping pills, and steroids, respectively, for each unit increase in burnout (OR = 1.38, CI = 1.15–1.66 for IV drips; OR = 1.62, CI = 1.20–2.19 for sleeping pills; OR = 1.53, CI = 1.14–2.07 for steroids).
For antibiotics, sleeping pills, steroids, and appetite suppressants, nurses were 7–8% more likely to misuse these drugs for every 1-year increase in age (OR = 1.07, CI = 1.03–1.10 for antibiotics; OR = 1.07, CI = 1.03–1.11 for sleeping pills; OR = 1.08, CI = 1.04–1.12 for steroids; OR = 1.08, CI = 1.03–1.12 for appetite suppressants). In contrast, nurses had 3% lower odds of misusing IV drips with each year of age increase (OR = 0.97, CI = 0.93-1.00).
Anzeige
Table 3
Associations of workplace accessibility, burnout, and individual factors with nurses’ prescription drug misusea
IV drips | Pain relievers | Antibiotics | Sleeping pills | Steroids | Appetite suppressants | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
Frequency of administrationb | Often | 3.00* | 1.16, 7.80 | 1.88 | 0.92, 3.85 | 0.95 | 0.45, 1.99 | 1.66 | 0.74, 3.73 | 1.00 | 0.44, 2.28 | 3.79* | 1.18, 12.13 |
Rarely/Sometimes | 4.39** | 1.54, 12.52 | 2.31* | 1.08, 4.95 | 1.80 | 0.79, 4.09 | 1.23 | 0.55, 2.75 | 1.40 | 0.63, 3.08 | 1.85 | 0.99, 3.47 | |
Never (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
Perceived availabilityc | Very easy | 9.91*** | 5.16, 19.06 | 4.74*** | 3.08, 7.32 | 3.17*** | 1.82, 5.51 | 1.99 | 0.71, 5.56 | 4.32*** | 1.94, 9.64 | 6.01** | 1.79, 20.22 |
Easy | 6.46*** | 3.37, 12.39 | 3.05*** | 2.06, 4.51 | 2.92*** | 1.80, 4.72 | 2.81*** | 1.59, 4.98 | 4.57*** | 2.51, 8.32 | 2.94* | 1.29, 6.68 | |
Difficult | 2.66** | 1.27, 5.58 | 1.57 | 0.99, 2.48 | 1.88* | 1.12, 3.14 | 1.92* | 1.12, 3.28 | 1.90* | 1.02, 3.53 | 1.59 | 0.86, 2.95 | |
Very difficult (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
Age | 0.97* | 0.93, 1.00 | 1.02 | 0.99, 1.04 | 1.07*** | 1.03, 1.10 | 1.07*** | 1.03, 1.11 | 1.08*** | 1.04, 1.12 | 1.08*** | 1.03, 1.12 | |
Gender | Female | 0.8 | 0.44, 1.37 | 1.10 | 0.67, 1.83 | 1.06 | 0.51, 2.20 | 0.80 | 0.35, 1.82 | 1.87 | 0.56, 6.18 | 1.31 | 0.39, 4.39 |
Male (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
Burnout | 1.38*** | 1.15, 1.66 | 1.16 | 0.99, 1.36 | 1.21 | 0.96, 1.52 | 1.62** | 1.20, 2.19 | 1.53** | 1.14, 2.07 | 1.25 | 0.89, 1.76 | |
Feature importance of mean absolute Shapley values
The variables were ranked in descending order of their impact, with the most significant influence at the top (Fig. 1). Through the analysis of Shapley feature importance in the predictive model for prescription drug usage, perceived availability emerged as the most influential factor for IV drips, pain relievers, and steroids, and closely followed the top factor for antibiotics and sleeping pills. Burnout surfaced as the most influential feature for antibiotics and sleeping pills, and as the second most influential feature for the other four drugs (IV drips, pain relievers, steroids, and appetite suppressants). For appetite suppressants, distinct from other drugs, age stood out as the most influential feature impacting drug misuse, with younger nurses being more likely to misuse them. Gender exhibited the lowest impact across all medications.
Fig. 1
Feature importance of mean absolute Shapley values
×
![]()
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the level of prescription drug misuse among nurses in South Korea. Considering the strict Korean social norms regarding substance use and to obtain accurate responses, we conducted an anonymous online survey on nurses recruited through a mobile shift-work scheduler application that is frequently used by nurses. Our study identified significant effects of workplace accessibility (at the environmental level) and burnout (at the individual level) on prescription drug misuse among nurses. These findings provide evidence to guide the formulation of targeted educational and policy interventions to address these interconnected factors within the nursing profession.
Although the level of drug misuse by nurses had not been previously assessed in South Korea, U.S. nurses have been reported to misuse prescription drugs at higher rates than the general population. Given nurses’ experience with administering drugs to patients, they may feel capable of controlling and monitoring their drug use for personal needs and eventually decide to use drugs without a doctor’s prescription [39]. Moreover, nurses commonly perceive that health issues can be treated by taking prescription drugs on their own without the need to visit a doctor, thus saving money and time [40]. However, the misuse of prescription drugs can result in drug dependence and adverse health effects when administered without consulting an expert [8]. This behavior not only endangers nurses’ well-being but also undermines patient trust in healthcare providers. This erosion of trust has far-reaching implications, tarnishing the image of the nursing profession as a whole.
The prescription drugs commonly used by nurses (pain relievers, IV drips, and antibiotics) reflect their professional challenges. The physically demanding nature of their tasks, coupled with irregular shift patterns and exposure to high-stress environments, leads nurses to turn to these medications for health challenges. Complaints of persistent back pain and musculoskeletal conditions among nurses underscore the toll of physically strenuous work demands [41]. Moreover, studies reveal a higher prevalence of health issues among those working rotating shifts due to circadian clock changes, which negatively impact various body systems [42, 43]. Lack of timely or convenient healthcare services when needed might lead to drug self-prescription and misuse among healthcare workers [44, 45]. In Korea, only 2% of pharmacies are accessible at night [46], highlighting the need for improved healthcare services for shift workers. Hospitals should establish targeted occupational health programs for nurses. Nurse managers should closely monitor their staff for any health problems, deteriorating work performance (e.g., absenteeism and burnout), or inappropriate access to prescription-type drugs [42, 47].
In our study, the relatively high level of misuse of IV drips was of concern. As little is known about the misuse of IV drips, it is difficult to fully explain its scope or contributing factors. Considering the circumstances, IV drip administration is an invasive procedure that requires needles and an aseptic technique. In a non-therapeutic, non-sterile environment for self-medication, undesirable complications (e.g., infections and skin damage) could occur; nurses may feel that they have the knowledge to prevent these adverse outcomes [48]. The phenomenon of IV drip use is not fully understood, and its contributing factors should be investigated in future studies.
At the environmental level, our study revealed that increased workplace accessibility (i.e., frequency of administration and perceived availability) of prescription drugs at the workplace is linked to a higher likelihood of misuse, consistent with existing research [15]. Easy access to drugs, including drug administration and access to controlled medication cabinets, as well as drug wastage within healthcare settings, increases the risk of healthcare professionals misusing or diverting medications for personal use [40, 42, 45]. Drug diversion, particularly the unauthorized use of prescription medications for self-administration, has emerged as a great concern in the healthcare industry [11]. Drug diversion is not only a criminal offense but also profoundly detrimental to both patients and healthcare providers [11]. Patients might be deprived of essential treatments, hindering their recovery and overall well-being [49]. Financially, the cost would incur for diverted medication not used for intended patient care leads to unwarranted expenses. Monitoring systems for drug counts should be implemented to reduce the perceived availability of drugs among nurses. For example, an electronic controlled substance ordering system (CSOS) could be used instead of a traditional paper form [50].
At the individual level, burnout also had a significant impact on prescription drug misuse, with higher levels of burnout associated with higher levels of misuse. This is consistent with previous research that found higher levels of burnout were associated with unprofessional behaviors such as substance use and malpractice [51]. Considering the inherently stressful nature of the nursing profession, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 when our study was conducted, nurses experienced significant exhaustion, leading to burnout [52]. The link between burnout and prescription drug misuse among nurses highlights the imperative for healthcare institutions to proactively address the mental health challenges faced by their staff. Our findings underscore the critical need for institutional efforts emphasizing psychological education and providing robust support systems to mitigate burnout and reduce the likelihood of prescription drug misuse [53].
Our study has strengths as one of the few investigations on prescription drug misuse among nurses in South Korea, and it holds the advantage of examining the relationship between nurses’ burnout, workplace access, and prescription drug misuse, which can contribute to their well-being. However, these findings should be interpreted in consideration of the study’s limitations. First, as we recruited a convenience sample of survey volunteers online, our participants may not be representative of the overall Korean nurse population. It is likely that nurses who were more comfortable with online environments responded to the survey, which could explain the relatively young age of the sample. Second, as the data were based on the participants’ self-reports, there might be social-desirability, recall, denial, or deception effects [54]. Nevertheless, considering that drug-related behaviors are sensitive issues, self-report questionnaires are the most convenient and widely used method for drug use assessments [55], and the online survey allowed us to obtain more accurate and honest information by ensuring anonymity [56]. Since prescription drug misuse and workplace accessibility have not been explored in the Korean nursing population, there may be insufficient evidence for the validity and reliability of the study instruments among Korean hospital nurses. Thorough psychometric testing of the items is warranted in the future. Additionally, data collection occurred during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have influenced responses such as burnout. Therefore, continuous research efforts are warranted.
Conclusion
As this is the first study of prescription drug misuse among Korean nurses, it offers baseline information for further research, as the willingness of nurses to report such information was not previously known. Our findings suggest that educational approaches to support the nurses’ help-seeking behavior towards personal/medical care issues should be provided early. This is especially important in South Korea, where workers with health issues reportedly face fear of stigma or other workplace disadvantages that can impede health-promoting behaviors. To reduce nurses’ perceived availability of medication for misuse in the workplace, government-level policies should be implemented to monitor drug counts in units and hospitals. Evidence-based workplace health promotion programs should be provided to increase workers’ stress management capability and health responsibility. In addition, a supportive climate should be created to help nurses access appropriate treatment with confidentiality. Hospitals ought to create specialized occupational health initiatives tailored specifically for nurses so that they can get proper treatment when needed, such as offering medical services during non-standard work hours for shift nurses.
Acknowledgements
N/A.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chung-Ang University (IRB No. 1041078-202203-HR-114). This research adhered to ethical guidelines and standards. Participation in the study was voluntary, and informed consent to participate was obtained from all of the participants.
Consent to publish
N/A.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
