Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2025 | Research

The moderating effect of working years on nurses’ medical narrative ability and empathy ability: a cross-sectional survey study

verfasst von: Hailing Qiu, Jie Huang, Tingzhi Li, Chao Yang, Yingyan Pan, Wanying Su, Qiong Qi, Fanling Li, Jing Yang, Yajuan Wu, Siqi Zhang, Jie Wen

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2025

Abstract

Objective

To explore the moderating effect of working years on nurses’ medical narrative ability and empathy ability.

Methods

A multi-center cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1920 clinical nurses from 12 general hospitals of different levels in 7 cities of Hunan Province. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, Narrative Competence Scale (NCS), and the Jefferson Empathy Health Professional Scale (JSE-HP). The general situation, medical narrative ability and empathy ability were investigated by questionnaires. The correlations among nurses’ working years, medical narrative ability and empathy ability were analyzed. The group regression method was used to analyze the moderating effect of different working years on nurses’ medical narrative ability and empathy ability, and the differences of regression coefficients were further analyzed to understand the specific effects of different working years.

Results

A total of 1852 valid questionnaires were collected, and the effective recovery rate was 96.46%. Medical narrative ability was positively correlated with empathy ability (r = 0.198, P < 0.05), working years was positively correlated with medical narrative ability (r = 0.047, P < 0.05), and there was no correlation between medical narrative ability and empathy ability (P > 0.05). Working years had a moderating effect on the relationship between medical narrative ability and empathy ability (β=-0.174, P < 0.001). Group regression analysis showed that with the increase of nurses’ working years, the regression coefficient of medical narrative ability and empathy ability decreased gradually (0.077 > 0.036 > 0.019). The difference of regression coefficient was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Nurses with different working years have different effects on empathy. With the increase of working years, the positive effect of medical narrative ability on empathy is gradually weakened. It suggests that nursing managers should carry out hierarchical intervention for nurses with different working years.
Hinweise

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

With the transformation of biopsychological and social medical model and the proposal of patient-centered quality nursing service, medical humanities have attracted more and more attention [1], and the harmonious unification of medicine and humanities is considered to be the highest realm of clinical medicine [2]. Empathy is considered to be the key to the establishment of medical humanities and the premise of the implementation of humanistic care [3, 4], as well as a key skill for nurses to provide high-quality nursing services [5]. “Empathy” (Einfuhlung in German) was first proposed in 1907 by the German psychologist Theodor Lipps, who believed that in interpersonal relationships, an observer would imagine and experience the physiological stress response of the observer [6]. Enhancing empathy skills can significantly foster the development of nurse-patient relationships [7], thereby improving patient treatment outcomes [8], effectively mitigating nurse-patient conflicts [9], increasing patient satisfaction, and reducing nurse job burnout [10]. Some studies indicate that the empathy levels among nurses vary with increasing years of work experience, and work experience is not necessarily proportional to empathy ability [11]. In China, after completing 3–4 years of professional education in school and passing the national nurse licensing examination to obtain a nurse qualification certificate, nurses must undergo an additional 1–2 years of standardized training before they can engage in specialized clinical nursing work. Registered nurses in China are categorized into four levels based on their professional and technical qualifications: senior, associate senior, intermediate, and primary. Clinical nursing positions are primarily divided into two categories: nurse and head nurse. The average retirement age for nurses is 55 years, allowing them to have a clinical career spanning over 30 years [12]. A survey shows that there is a negative correlation between the empathy ability of nurses with intermediate work experience who have worked for 10 to 19 years [13]. As an inborn quality, empathy is malleable and can be learned and developed through education and practice.
Narrative medicine has been applied in many countries as a framework for medical humanities training and a new model for clinical work [14]. Narrative medicine refers to medical behavior with medical narrative ability [15]. In addition to medical professional ability, medical narrative ability refers to the ability of medical staff to listen to patients’ narratives, understand and respect their expressed meanings, and empathic and responsive to them, that is, the ability to absorb, understand and respond to the experience of others. This ability can help medical staff to enter the world of patients, empathize with their suffering, and establish “heart-to-heart” communication [14]. Medical narrative ability takes empathy as the core and has also been used as an intervention in clinical practice [15]. Yang et al. highlighted that narrative medical education serves as an effective strategy to enhance empathy [16]. Multiple studies have demonstrated significant variations in narrative medicine ability scores among nurses with varying years of experience [17]. While the cultivation of narrative skills offers a promising avenue for improving empathy, and the years of service exert diverse influences on both narrative and empathy abilities, there remains a paucity of explicit research examining the relationship between these two abilities among nurses with different levels of experience.
This study selected nurses from clinical departments of different levels of hospitals in Hunan Province as the research objects to analyze the moderating effect and potential influence of working years on the relationship between medical narrative ability and empathy ability, so as to provide scientific basis for nursing managers to formulate personalized training strategies and improve nurses’ medical narrative ability and empathy ability.

Methods

This was a multi-center cross-sectional study. From April to May 2022, convenience sampling was used to select in-service nurses from 12 general hospitals of different levels in 7 cities of Hunan Province as the research objects (The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, the Central Hospital of Xiangtan, the People’s Hospital of Shaoshan, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shaoyang University, the People’s Hospital of Xinshao, the First People’s Hospital of Chengzhou, the First People’s Hospital of Guiyang, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, the People’s Hospital of Leiyang, the People’s Hospital of Xiangxi, the People’s Hospital of Jishou, the People’s Hospital of Sangzhi). Inclusion criteria: ① On-the-job nurses in clinical departments who obtained the nursing professional qualification certificate of the People’s Republic of China; ② Engaged in nursing work for more than 1 year; ③ those who voluntarily participated in the survey and actively cooperated. Exclusion criteria: ① Nurses who were on sick leave, maternity leave, or not on duty for half a year or more; The study passed the review of the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, and all the research subjects completed the questionnaire on the premise of fully informed consent.

Survey tools

General information questionnaire

It consists of two parts. 1.Basic information: age, gender, highest education, marital status, children, etc. 2.Work status: hospital level, department, professional title, working years, position, whether the unit has carried out narrative nursing training, etc.

Medical narrative ability scale for medical staff

Narrative Competence Scale (NCS) for medical staff was developed by Ma Wanzhen et al. [19] in 2020 to test the ability level of medical staff to carry out narrative medicine and narrative nursing, it was an original Chinese language scale, and its Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.950. The scale included 27 items in 3 dimensions of attention and listening (9 items), understanding and response (12 items), reflection and reproduction (6 items). Each item was scored by Likert 7-point scoring method, ranging from 1 to 7 points from “very inconsistent” to “very consistent”, in which items 4 and 11 were scored in reverse. The higher the score, the higher the level of medical narrative ability. The Crnbach’s α coefficient of the scale in this study was 0.881, indicating that the internal consistency reliability of the scale was acceptable.

Empathic ability scale

The Jefferson Empathy Health Professional Scale (JSE-HP) was developed by Hojat [20] of Jefferson University and members of his research team in 2001 to evaluate nurses’ empathy ability, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of the scale was 0.890 for medical students and 0.870 for residents. There were 20 items in 3 dimensions of perspective taking (10 items), emotional care (7 items), and empathy (3 items). Each item was scored by Likert 7-point scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” from 1 to 7 points, and from “completely disagree” to “completely agree” were assigned from 1 to 7 points. The higher the total score of the scale, the higher the score of the scale. The higher the total score, the higher the level of empathy. The Crnbach’s α coefficient of the scale in this study was 0.828, indicating that the internal consistency reliability of the scale was acceptable.

Data collection methods

The content of the questionnaire was imported into the questionnaire Star with unified instructions, and the survey was conducted online. Before the survey, the researcher contacted the head nurses of each department, and the head nurses served as investigators and received unified training. The link of the questionnaire was sent to the clinical nursing staff through the head nurses of each department to fill in, and the inclusion criteria and filling requirements were explained. Each device or ID account is limited to fill in once, and the questionnaire is open from April to May 2022. After the questionnaire was collected, two people checked and excluded those who were valid for less than 3 min or selected the same option for 10 consecutive items.

Statistical methods

All data were exported to Excel and data cleaning was performed. SPSS25.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data. The measurement data were described by description, and the count data were described by frequency and percentage. Two independent sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare the relationship between demographic characteristics and medical narrative ability and empathy ability. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between variables. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the moderating effect of working years on the relationship between medical narrative ability and empathy ability. Variables significantly associated with empathic ability were added to a series of regression models to examine whether working years and medical narrative ability were associated with empathic ability and predictive ability. Covariates in the regression model included demographic variables that were significantly different in the univariate analysis; The predictor variables were progressively tested for their prediction of the outcome variable. At the same time, group regression analysis was used to test the moderating effect of the relationship between medical narrative ability and empathy ability of nurses with different working years. Finally, the moderating effect of different working years was analyzed by simple slope. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General information of respondents and comparison of medical narrative ability and empathy ability scores of nurses with different characteristics

A total of 1920 questionnaires were collected in this study, and 1852 valid questionnaires were collected, with an effective recovery rate of 96.46%. A total of 1852 subjects were clinical nurses from 12 hospitals of different levels in 7 cities in Hunan Province, including 51 males (2.8%) and 1801 females (97.2%)(According to the 2022 China Health Statistics Yearbook, male nurses constitute merely 3.4% of the total registered nurse population in China). Their age ranged from 18 to 54 years, with an average of (33.10 ± 6.67) years. Their working years ranged from 1 to 36 years, with an average of (11.61 ± 7.31) years. The age and working years were divided into 5 years and 10 years as a unit, and the scores of medical narrative ability and empathy ability were compared. The results showed that there were statistically significant differences in the scores of marital status, with or without children, position, education background, and whether the unit had carried out narrative training (P < 0.05), see Tables 1 & 2 for details.
Table 1
Demographic characteristics of the respondents (n = 1852, points)
Items
Number of cases [n (%)]
Gender
 
male
51 (2.8)
female
1801 (97.2)
Age
 
< 25 years old
202 (10.9)
25 to 35
1,098 (59.3)
36–45 years old
443 (23.9)
> 45 years old
109 (5.9)
Marital status
 
Unmarried
242 (13.1)
Married
1610 (86.9)
With or without children
 
There are
1023 (55.2)
There is no
829 (44.8)
Hospital grade
 
Grade 3
1,546 (85.5)
Grade II
306 (16.5)
Department you work in
 
Internal Medicine
677 (36.6)
Surgery
732 (39.5)
Other
443 (23.9)
Years of service
 
≤ 5 years
376 (20.3)
6 to 15 years
1050 (56.7)
> 15 years
426 (23.0)
Education
 
College or below
339 (18.3)
Undergraduate
1459 (78.8)
Master’s
54 (2.9)
Professional title
 
Nurse practitioner and below
905 (48.9)
Nurse in Charge
765 (41.3)
Associate Chief Nurse and above
182 (9.8)
Duties
 
Nurse
1640 (88.6)
Head nurse
212 (11.4)
Whether the unit has conducted narrative training
 
is
509 (27.5)
no
834 (45.0)
Not sure
509 (27.5)
Table 2
Differences in medical narrative ability and empathy ability scores of nurses with different characteristics (n = 1852, points)
Items
Medical narrative ability score
\( $$$$\left( {\bar X \pm S} \right)$$$$ \)
Empathy scores
\( $$$$\left( {\bar X \pm S} \right)$$$$ \)
 
Focus on listening
Understand the response
Reflective representation
Total score
Opinion taking
Emotional nursing
Put yourself in your shoes
Total score
Gender
        
male
48.78 + / − 5.50
69.88 + / − 9.26
36.18 + / − 3.44
154.84 + / − 16.45
44.73 + / − 8.70
28.53 + / − 5.99
15.71 + / − 2.63
88.96 + / − 14.20
female
48.37 + / − 6.44
69.88 + / − 9.23
35.67 + / − 4.33
153.93 + / − 17.13
43.25 + / − 7.44
27.34 + / − 5.77
15.28 + / − 2.25
85.88 + / − 12.79
t
0.450
0.001
0.825
0.377
1.389
1.440
1.309
1.689
Age
        
< 25 years old
48.15 + / − 6.05
70.03 + / − 8.85
35.87 + / − 3.98
154.05 + / − 15.74
42.58 + / − 7.40
27.22 + / − 5.58
14.95 + / − 2.36
84.75 + / − 12.13
25 to 35 years old
48.34 + / − 6.27
69.36 + / − 9.58
35.51 + / − 4.35
153.21 + / − 17.40
43.32 + / − 7.34
27.40 + / − 5.85
15.25 + / − 2.23
85.97 + / − 12.87
36 to 45 years old
48.39 + / − 6.85
70.72 + / − 8.91
35.92 + / − 4.52
155.02 + / − 17.57
43.67 + / − 7.90
27.61 + / − 5.95
15.46 + / − 2.35
86.74 + / − 13.35
> 45 years old
49.25 + / − 6.66
71.47 + / − 6.90
36.13 + / − 3.43
156.84 + / − 13.93
42.76 + / − 7.21
26.52 + / − 4.67
15.76 + / − 1.97
85.05 + / − 11.05
F
0.761
3.494*
1.526
2.309
1.166
1.100
4.049*
1.328
Marital status
        
Unmarried
38.60 + / − 9.14
52.71 + / − 9.38
28.54 + / − 5.45
119.85 + / − 12.99
40.97 + / − 6.09
27.36 + / − 4.22
14.00 + / − 2.42
82.33 + / − 9.45
Married
49.86 + / − 4.27
72.46 + / − 5.81
36.76 + / − 2.84
159.08 + / − 10.49
43.64 + / − 7.61
27.38 + / − 5.98
15.49 + / − 2.18
86.52 + / − 13.19
t
t
31.546
44.872
36.161
52.460
5.214
0.061
9.789
4.756
Children
        
There are
51.86 + / − 3.45
74.83 + / − 4.76
37.71 + / − 2.59
164.40 + / − 8.23
44.91 + / − 8.21
27.84 + / − 6.52
15.77 + / − 2.29
88.52 + / − 14.32
There is no
44.10 + / − 6.63
63.78 + / − 9.75
33.18 + / − 4.68
141.06 + / − 16.41
41.29 + / − 5.87
26.82 + / − 4.61
14.71 + / − 2.09
82.82 + / − 9.87
t
32.434***
31.857***
26.396***
39.739***
10.677***
3.803***
10.255***
9.743***
Hospital grade
        
Grade 3
48.48 + / − 6.47
69.94 + / − 9.19
35.72 + / − 4.17
154.14 + / − 16.88
43.33 + / − 7.52
27.42 + / − 5.86
15.29 + / − 2.27
86.04 + / − 13.00
Level two
47.91 + / − 6.10
69.58 + / − 9.43
35.50 + / − 4.93
152.99 + / − 18.20
43.10 + / − 7.25
27.16 + / − 5.36
15.34 + / − 2.23
85.60 + / − 11.98
t
1.434
0.621
0.825
1.081
0.487
0.731
0.395
0.543
Department you work in
        
Internal Medicine
48.27 + / − 6.19
69.83 + / − 8.78
35.69 + / − 4.14
153.80 + / − 16.21
43.53 + / − 7.48
27.34 + / − 5.64
15.43 + / − 2.17
86.29 + / − 12.60
Surgery
48.68 + / − 6.58
70.07 + / − 9.43
35.62 + / − 4.49
154.36 + / − 17.87
43.33 + / − 7.58
27.39 + / − 5.94
15.20 + / − 2.32
85.92 + / − 13.19
Other
48.07 + / − 6.47
69.65 + / − 9.57
35.79 + / − 4.26
153.51 + / − 17.17
42.87 + / − 7.29
27.43 + / − 5.74
15.25 + / − 2.32
85.55 + / − 12.63
F
1.374
0.301
0.213
0.386
1.033
0.035
1.954
0.459
Years of service
        
≤ 5 years
48.56 + / − 5.99
69.63 + / − 8.89
35.45 + / − 4.15
153.64 + / − 16.04
42.97 + / − 7.85
27.37 + / − 5.62
15.18 + / − 2.18
85.52 + / − 13.06
6 to 15 years
48.31 + / − 6.46
69.55 + / − 9.58
35.63 + / − 4.45
153.49 + / − 17.62
43.32 + / − 7.40
27.47 + / − 6.02
15.22 + / − 2.32
86.01 + / − 12.97
> 15 years
48.43 + / − 6.66
70.92 + / − 8.56
36.03 + / − 4.08
155.38 + / − 16.69
43.49 + / − 7.34
27.18 + / − 5.31
15.59 + / − 2.19
86.26 + / − 12.31
F
0.225
3.512*
2.009
1.928
0.504
0.386
4.758**
0.344
Education
        
College or below
48.39 + / − 6.50
69.27 + / − 9.66
35.63 + / − 4.47
153.29 + / − 18.34
43.80 + / − 7.75
27.53 + / − 5.72
15.23 + / − 2.29
86.55 + / − 12.98
Undergraduate
48.40 + / − 6.48
70.05 + / − 9.20
35.72 + / − 4.31
154.17 + / − 17.00
43.27 + / − 7.45
27.40 + / − 5.85
15.34 + / − 2.27
86.00 + / − 12.88
Master’s
47.98 + / − 3.59
69.17 + / − 6.80
35.22 + / − 3.22
152.37 + / − 10.70
40.67 + / − 6.03
26.06 + / − 3.92
14.59 + / − 1.80
81.31 + / − 9.53
F
0.111
1.145
0.379
0.599
4.118*
1.531
2.982
3.920*
Professional title
        
Nurse practitioner and below
48.38 + / − 6.25
69.31 + / − 9.62
35.47 + / − 4.56
153.16 + / − 17.77
43.23 + / − 7.70
27.43 + / − 6.05
15.10 + / − 2.30
85.75 + / − 13.19
Nurse-in-charge
48.47 + / − 6.45
70.13 + / − 9.19
35.79 + / − 4.22
154.39 + / − 17.02
43.61 + / − 7.43
27.49 + / − 5.67
15.45 + / − 2.27
86.55 + / − 12.87
Associate chief Nurse and above
48.06 + / − 7.07
71.68 + / − 6.82
36.29 + / − 3.21
156.03 + / − 13.57
42.26 + / − 6.41
26.72 + / − 4.75
15.64 + / − 1.96
84.62 + / − 10.67
F
0.301
5.478**
3.166*
2.568
2.454
1.348
7.358**
1.905
Duties
        
Nurse
48.30 + / − 6.58
69.67 + / − 9.44
35.59 + / − 4.41
153.56 + / − 17.53
43.41 + / − 7.59
27.46 + / − 5.90
15.27 + / − 2.31
86.12 + / − 13.12
Head nurse
49.03 + / − 4.90
71.53 + / − 7.20
36.46 + / − 3.36
157.02 + / − 12.95
42.38 + / − 6.53
26.77 + / − 4.71
15.48 + / − 1.84
84.62 + / − 10.32
t
1.562
2.767
2.794
2.783
1.893
1.639
1.229
1.623
Does the unit conduct narrative training
        
is
49.46 + / − 6.76
72.62 + / − 8.26
36.86 + / − 3.78
153.94 + / − 15.26
44.11 + / − 8.20
27.66 + / − 6.96
15.45 + / − 2.39
87.22 + / − 14.90
no
47.99 + / − 6.38
68.83 + / − 9.41
35.18 + / − 4.44
152.00 + / − 17.55
42.99 + / − 7.05
27.27 + / − 5.26
15.19 + / − 2.21
85.46 + / − 11.84
Uncertain
47.96 + / − 5.99
68.86 + / − 9.30
35.34 + / − 4.38
152.16 + / − 17.13
42.96 + / − 7.37
27.28 + / − 5.27
15.31 + / − 2.22
85.55 + / − 12.11
F
9.869***
31.888***
27.250***
30.782***
4.241*
0.820
2.102
3.373*
Note: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Correlation analysis of nurses’ working years, medical narrative ability and empathy ability

Pearson correlation analysis showed that medical narrative ability was positively correlated with empathy ability (r= -0.007-0.314, P < 0.01). Spearman correlation analysis showed that working years was positively correlated with medical narrative ability (r = 0.047, P < 0.05). There was no correlation between working years and the total score of empathy ability (P > 0.05), as shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Correlation analysis of working years, medical narrative ability and empathy ability (n = 1852)
Items
Medical narrative ability
Paying attention to listening
Understand the response
Reflective representation
Empathic ability
Choice of perspective
Emotional nursing
Empathy
Years of service
Medical narrative skills
1
        
Focus on listening
0.757**
1
       
Understand the response
0.926**
0.491**
1
      
Reflective representation
0.860**
0.464**
0.805**
1
     
Empathic ability
0.198**
0.213**
0.146**
0.155**
1
    
Opinion taking
0.218**
0.206**
0.175**
0.183**
0.902**
1
   
Emotional care
0.034
0.116**
0.013
0.007
0.828**
0.543**
1
  
Put yourself in your shoes
0.314**
0.229**
0.287**
0.291**
0.579**
0.423**
0.348**
1
 
Length of service
0.047*
0.006
0.063**
0.058*
0.042
0.041
0.001
0.075**
1
Note: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

The moderating effect of working years on medical narrative ability and empathy ability

This study used multiple linear regression analysis to detect the moderating effect of working years. Assuming that nurses’ working years was the moderating variable, moderator variables were categorized into two groups: the high group, where the moderator variable score was ≥ (mean + standard deviation), and the low group, where the moderator variable score was ≤ (mean - standard deviation), medical narrative ability was taken as the independent variable, empathy ability was taken as the dependent variable, the independent variable was decentralized, and the product term was constructed with the moderating variable. Model 1 introduced the control variable, model 2 introduced the independent variable, model 3 introduced the moderating variable, and model 4 introduced the interaction term “medical narrative ability × working years”. The results showed that medical narrative ability could affect empathy alone, and the interaction term had a statistically significant effect on empathy. The standardized coefficient β=-0.174 (P < 0.01), ΔR2 = 0.003 (P < 0.01), indicating that working years had a moderating effect between medical narrative ability and empathy ability. See Table 4 for more information. Meanwhile, as shown in Fig. 1, compared with nurses with high working years, the empathy ability of nurses with low working years increases more obviously with the medical narrative ability.
Table 4
Results of analysis of moderating effects of nurses’ working years (n = 1852)
 
Empathy ability
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
Beta.
P
Beta.
P
Beta.
P
Beta.
P
Control variables
Marital status
0.020
0.427
0.071
0.052
0.071
0.051
0.077
0.035
With or without children
0.211
< 0.001
0.146
< 0.001
0.146
< 0.001
0.144
< 0.001
Education
0.040
0.081
0.040
0.077
0.042
0.065
0.041
0.069
 
Whether the unit has carried out narrative training
0.012
0.586
0.012
0.511
0.012
0.511
0.014
0.533
Independent variables
Medical narrative ability
  
0.154
0.001
0.154
0.001
0.327
< 0.001
Moderating variables
Years of service
    
0.017
0.445
0.019
0.402
Interaction items
Medical narrative ability × Length of service
      
0.174
0.023
 
Δ F
24.842
< 0.001
11.330
0.001
0.720
0.445
5.098
0.023
 
R2
0.051
 
0.057
 
0.057
 
0.060
 
 
Adjusted R
0.049
 
0.055
 
0.054
 
0.057
 
 
Δ R
0.051
 
0.006
 
0.000
 
0.003
 
In order to get further understand the moderating effect of working years, group regression analysis was then performed. As shown in Table 5, nurses with different working years had different levels of influence of medical narrative ability on empathy ability, which gradually decreased from high to low (0.077 > 0.036 > 0.019), indicating that medical narrative ability could partially compensate for empathy ability to some extent. The regression coefficient difference test showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the regression coefficient of the effect of medical narrative ability on empathy ability between nurses with working years ≤ 5 years and those with working years 6–15 years (P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the regression coefficient of the effect of medical narrative ability on empathy ability between nurses with working years ≤ 5 years and those with working years > 15 years (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the regression coefficient of the effect of medical narrative ability on empathy ability between nurses with 6–15 years of working experience and nurses with more than 15 years of working experience (P > 0.05). See Table 6.
Table 5
Group regression analysis of the moderating effect of different working years on the relationship between nurses’ medical narrative ability and empathy ability (n = 1852)
 
Length of service
≤ 5 years
6 to 15 years
> 15 years
Beta.
P
Beta.
P
Beta.
P
Marital status
0.030
0.587
0.020
0.549
0.005
0.928
With or without children
0.243
0.000
0.224
0.000
0.147
0.006
Education
0.067
0.178
0.018
0.559
0.080
0.098
Whether the unit has carried out narrative training
0.092
0.070
0.024
0.434
0.076
0.118
Medical narrative ability
0.277
0.000
0.193
0.000
0.139
0.004
Δ F
31.141
0.000
40.637
0.000
8.309
0.004
R2
0.077
 
0.037
 
0.019
 
Adjusted R
0.074
 
0.036
 
0.017
 
Δ R
0.077
 
0.037
 
0.019
 
Table 6
Regression coefficient difference test of the moderating effect of medical narrative ability on empathy ability of nurses with different working years (n = 1852)
Name
Term 1
Item 2
Regression coefficient b1
Regression coefficient b2
Difference
t
P
Medical narrative ability
≤ 5 years
6 to 15 years
0.226
0.142
0.084
1.793
0.073
≤ 5 years
> 15 years
0.226
0.102
0.124
2.298
0.022
6 to 15 years
> 15 years
0.142
0.102
0.040
0.935
0.350

Discussion

In this study, medical narrative ability was found to be positively correlated with empathy ability. Working years exhibited a weak correlation with medical narrative ability but did not show a direct correlation with empathy ability. However, working years moderate the relationship between medical narrative ability and empathy ability. Specifically, for nurses with fewer working years, increases in medical narrative ability are associated with more significant improvements in empathy ability compared to nurses with more working years.

The scores of nurses’ medical narrative ability and empathy ability are at a medium level

The total score of nurses’ medical narrative ability in this survey was (153.95 ± 17.10) points. Referring to Ma et al. ‘s study [18], the reference value of medical narrative ability was divided as follows: < 145 points were weak, 145–163 points were medium, > 163 points were strong, and the nurses’ medical narrative ability in this study was at a medium level. In addition, in this study, the score of empathy ability of nurses was (85.97 ± 12.83), which was significantly lower than the results of previous studies [20]. Considering that the reason for the difference may be that the subjects of previous studies were medical students in school, while the subjects of this study included nurses from secondary and tertiary hospitals. The differences between hospital levels and individuals have a certain impact on the research results. On the other hand, the empathy ability of nurses still needs to be improved.

Nurses’ medical narrative ability and empathy ability are affected by many factors

At the same time, through the analysis of the general characteristics of the research objects, marital status, whether there are children, position, education background and whether the unit has carried out narrative training are the influencing factors of nurses’ medical narrative ability and empathy ability, which is consistent with the conclusions of previous studies [21,22]. The empathy ability score of nurses with junior college degree or below was 86.55 ± 12.98, 86.00 ± 12.88 for those with bachelor’s degree and 81.31 ± 9.53 for those with master’s degree. Among them, the higher the education level, the lower the empathy ability score, which is mainly affected by perspective taking. It may be that the higher the education level of the nurses, their sense of autonomy is stronger, and they are not susceptible to the influence of others’ views. At the same time, the score of geriatric medical narrative ability of nurses was higher than that of ordinary nurses, the mean scores for nurses and head nurses were 153.56 ± 17.53 and 157.02 ± 12.95, respectively, which was mainly affected by the two dimensions of understanding response and reflection representation. Yu Y [23] et al. demonstrated that higher-ranking nurses exhibit superior medical narrative abilities, which aligns with the findings of this study. This correlation can be attributed to the increased clinical learning opportunities and deeper understanding of humanistic care associated with higher positions, fostering a positive attitude towards narrative nursing. Additionally, married nurses with children scored higher in both medical narrative ability and empathy compared to their unmarried counterparts without children. Specifically, the scores for medical narrative ability and empathy were 159.08 ± 10.49 and 86.52 ± 13.19 for married nurses, respectively, versus 119.85 ± 12.99 and 82.33 ± 9.45 for unmarried nurses. Similarly, nurses with children achieved scores of 164.40 ± 8.23 and 88.52 ± 14.32 for medical narrative ability and empathy, respectively, compared to 141.06 ± 16.41 and 82.82 ± 9.87 for those without children. These results are consistent with the research by Ozdemir et al. [24], suggesting that married nurses with children possess greater experience in interpersonal interactions, enabling them to better empathize and communicate emotionally. In addition, there were statistically significant differences in the scores of medical narrative ability and empathy ability of nurses who had carried out narrative nursing training (P < 0.05), and the scores of nurses who had carried out narrative nursing training were significantly higher than those who had not received training. The mean scores for medical narrative ability and empathy ability among nurses who underwent narrative training were 153.94 ± 15.26 and 87.22 ± 14.90, respectively. In contrast, the mean scores for those who did not undergo narrative training were 152.00 ± 17.55 and 85.46 ± 11.84, respectively. These findings align with the conclusions drawn by Xue et al. [25]. It is necessary to receive relevant training centered on empathy for medical staff to cultivate their empathy ability, nursing managers should consider its influencing factors and pay attention to personalized training when formulating training programs.

Nurses’ medical narrative ability is correlated with their empathy ability

The results of this study show that medical narrative ability is positively correlated with empathy ability (r=-0.007∼0.314, P<0.01), which is consistent with the conclusions of previous studies [16, 26], suggesting that medical narrative ability can reflect empathy ability to a certain extent. However, the correlation coefficient between working years and medical narrative ability was 0.047–0.063, and the correlation coefficient was very low. It may be because some nurses’ units in this study had carried out narrative training, which had a certain degree of influence on the results of correlation test. In addition, this study demonstrated that there was no significant correlation between working years and empathy ability (P > 0.05). Another study [27] found that although nurses with varying lengths of work experience had different empathy scores, there was no direct relationship between work experience and empathy ability. This suggests that without standardized training, empathy scores do not necessarily increase with longer working years [27, 28]. Compared with previous studies [26], the correlation coefficient between medical narrative ability and empathy ability in this study ranged from 0.175 to 0.314, which was relatively low. It may be that only 27.5% of nurses in the units where the respondents worked in this study had carried out narrative nursing related training, and most nurses had not received relevant training, suggesting that we, Most nurses have not received relevant training, suggesting that there is still a lot of room for improvement in nurses’ empathy and medical narrative ability. Although empathy is an innate trait, it can be increased through training [28, 29]. Chen et al. found that the cultivation of medical narrative ability can promote the improvement of empathy ability of medical staff [30, 31]. Some studies have used medical narrative or key event writing as an intervention method to promote the empathy ability of medical staff [31, 32]. At the same time, the cultivation of medical narrative ability enables medical staff to gradually develop their self-exploration and reflection ability and improve their awareness of professional identity [32, 33]. It suggests that it is necessary for nursing managers to carry out narrative nursing related training for nurses.

Working years have a moderating effect between nurses’ medical narrative ability and empathy ability

This study not only further confirmed the direct relationship between medical narrative ability and empathy ability, but also verified for the first time the moderating effect of working years on the relationship between medical narrative ability and empathy ability. The results showed that the coefficient of the interaction term medical narrative ability and working years was significantly negative(β=-0.174, P = 0.023), indicating that working years weakened the positive effect of medical narrative ability on empathy ability as a whole. According to the results in Fig. 1, when the working years are lower than the average level, the positive effect of medical narrative ability on empathy is more obvious. However, when the working years are higher than the average level, the positive effect of medical narrative ability on empathy is relatively weakened. In addition, the results of this study showed that when the working years were divided into different levels, the regression coefficient of medical narrative ability on empathy ability gradually decreased from high to low (0.077 > 0.036 > 0.019), indicating that medical narrative ability could partially compensate for empathy ability to some extent, but with the increase of working years, the positive effect of medical narrative ability on empathy ability was relatively weakened. The compensation effect of medical narrative ability on empathy ability is gradually reduced, that is, the positive effect is gradually weakened. As can be seen from Table 6, the regression coefficient of medical narrative ability on empathy ability of nurses with working experience ≤ 5 years and working experience > 15 years was significantly different, with statistical significance (P < 0.05), indicating that the effect of medical narrative ability on empathy ability was mainly affected by nurses with working experience ≤ 5 years and working experience > 15 years. This may be attributed to the fact that junior nurses lack experience in complex clinical tasks, leading to feelings of depression and other negative emotions that diminish work quality and empathy, which aligns with the findings of Zhang et al. [33]. Over time, as nurses accumulate more clinical experience, they become better equipped to promptly identify patients’ narrative needs and empathize with their experiences of illness. However, after reaching a certain number of years in practice, due to the continuous advancement of China’s medical system and increasingly stringent requirements for higher-level nurses, the high-intensity work environment can lead to physical and mental burnout, fostering a sense of counteraction and ultimately resulting in a decline in empathy. This is consistent with the research by Li et al. [34]. In addition, nurses are exposed to the suffering of patients for a long time and repeatedly [35]. In addition to high workload, nurses in this period are often faced with the pressure of supporting their parents and raising the next generation, and are more likely to show passive behavior and emotional exhaustion [13]. It can be observed that while the number of working years increases, nurses’ empathy ability also improves; however, this improvement may be influenced by other factors, which could potentially weaken the positive impact of medical narrative competence on empathy. Therefore, nursing managers should pay attention to the characteristics of nurses with different working years and adopt a hierarchical training method when carrying out narrative nursing related training.

Limitations

There is a confusion in this study: working years have low correlation with medical narrative ability and no correlation with empathy ability, which we guess may be caused by our study directly stratified analysis of nurses with different working years according to their general data characteristics. The deficiencies of this study mainly include the following two points. First, the sample of this study is only from one province in Hunan Province, and the regional characteristics of the sample are limited, which may affect the specificity of the results and the promotion and application of the results in the future. Second, this study used an online questionnaire star survey, and the accuracy of the research results may be affected by the attitude and cognition of nurses when filling in the questionnaire. Future research may add multi-center survey and objective evaluation methods such as peer evaluation for further investigation, so as to provide more scientific research data for the training of nurses’ medical narrative ability.

Conclusion

There is a significant correlation between medical narrative ability and empathy ability among nurses, with working years exerting a moderating effect on this relationship. Specifically, the positive impact of medical narrative ability on empathy ability diminishes as working years increase, particularly for nurses with less than 5 years or more than 15 years of experience. This suggests that nursing managers should implement tiered training programs tailored to nurses with varying levels of experience. For middle and senior nurses, providing adequate resource support can enhance their work enthusiasm; for junior nurses, reinforcing positive guidance and fostering a supportive organizational atmosphere can help maintain their optimal working state. While this study provides valuable insights, it also has limitations. Future research should consider expanding the sample size and incorporating objective evaluation methods to further validate these findings.

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the ethic committee of Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ling B, Lang J. Humane accomplishment of physicians and the philosophy of minimally-invasive and noninvasive medicine: a perspective. Ultrason Sonochem. 2015;27:668–70.CrossRefPubMed Ling B, Lang J. Humane accomplishment of physicians and the philosophy of minimally-invasive and noninvasive medicine: a perspective. Ultrason Sonochem. 2015;27:668–70.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Morishita M, Iida J, Nishigori H. Reconstructing the concept of empathy: an analysis of Japanese doctors’ narratives of their experiences with illness. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023;28(1):87–106.CrossRefPubMed Morishita M, Iida J, Nishigori H. Reconstructing the concept of empathy: an analysis of Japanese doctors’ narratives of their experiences with illness. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023;28(1):87–106.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Giménez-Espert MDC, Prado-Gascó VJ. Empathy in nurses: Spanish adaptation of the Jefferson scale of empathy (JSE) on nurses. Contemp Nurse. 2020 Apr-Jun;56(3):255–65. Giménez-Espert MDC, Prado-Gascó VJ. Empathy in nurses: Spanish adaptation of the Jefferson scale of empathy (JSE) on nurses. Contemp Nurse. 2020 Apr-Jun;56(3):255–65.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lippst A, Pleasure. Trans[Z],1965: 409. Lippst A, Pleasure. Trans[Z],1965: 409.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wan Q, Jiang L, Zeng Y, Wu X. A big-five personality model-based study of empathy behaviors in clinical nurses. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019;38:66–71.CrossRefPubMed Wan Q, Jiang L, Zeng Y, Wu X. A big-five personality model-based study of empathy behaviors in clinical nurses. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019;38:66–71.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Durkin J, Jackson D, Usher K. Defining compassion in a hospital setting: consensus on the characteristics that comprise compassion from researchers in the field. Contemp Nurse. 2020;56(2):146–59.CrossRefPubMed Durkin J, Jackson D, Usher K. Defining compassion in a hospital setting: consensus on the characteristics that comprise compassion from researchers in the field. Contemp Nurse. 2020;56(2):146–59.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuguero O, Ramon MJ, Esquerda M, et al. Association between low empathy and high burnout among primary care physicians and nurses in Lleida, Spain. Euro J Gen Pract. 2017;23(1):4–10.CrossRef Yuguero O, Ramon MJ, Esquerda M, et al. Association between low empathy and high burnout among primary care physicians and nurses in Lleida, Spain. Euro J Gen Pract. 2017;23(1):4–10.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren Y, Song H, Li S, Xiao F. Mediating effects of nursing organizational climate on the relationships between empathy and burnout among clinical nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(11):3048–58.CrossRefPubMed Ren Y, Song H, Li S, Xiao F. Mediating effects of nursing organizational climate on the relationships between empathy and burnout among clinical nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(11):3048–58.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yi X, Sicheng X, Lihui Z, Jianhui X, Zhenhui S, Xiang D, Yang H. Changes in empathy of nurses from 2009 to 2018: a cross-temporal meta-analysis. Nurs Ethics. 2021;28(5):776–90.CrossRefPubMed Yi X, Sicheng X, Lihui Z, Jianhui X, Zhenhui S, Xiang D, Yang H. Changes in empathy of nurses from 2009 to 2018: a cross-temporal meta-analysis. Nurs Ethics. 2021;28(5):776–90.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin X, Pan Z, Hou S, Pang H, Dong A, Hu L, Brown S, Plester G, Chi C. The roles and responsibilities of general practice nurses in China: a qualitative study. BMC Prim Care. 2024;25(1):331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jin X, Pan Z, Hou S, Pang H, Dong A, Hu L, Brown S, Plester G, Chi C. The roles and responsibilities of general practice nurses in China: a qualitative study. BMC Prim Care. 2024;25(1):331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Moudatsou M, Stavropoulou A, Alegakis A, Philalithis A, Koukouli S. Self-reported Assessment of Empathy and its variations in a sample of Greek Social Workers. Healthc (Basel). 2021;9(2):219. Moudatsou M, Stavropoulou A, Alegakis A, Philalithis A, Koukouli S. Self-reported Assessment of Empathy and its variations in a sample of Greek Social Workers. Healthc (Basel). 2021;9(2):219.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Liao HC, Wang YH. Storytelling in Medical Education: Narrative Medicine as a resource for interdisciplinary collaboration. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1135.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liao HC, Wang YH. Storytelling in Medical Education: Narrative Medicine as a resource for interdisciplinary collaboration. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1135.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang N, Xiao H, Cao Y, et al. Does narrative medicine education improve nursing students’ empathic abilities and academic achievement? A randomised controlled trial. J INT MED RES. 2018;46(8):3306–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang N, Xiao H, Cao Y, et al. Does narrative medicine education improve nursing students’ empathic abilities and academic achievement? A randomised controlled trial. J INT MED RES. 2018;46(8):3306–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Han Q, Nan L, Yang H. Impact of narrative nursing cognition, self-efficacy, and social support on the practices of registered nurses in China: a structural equation modeling analysis. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):624.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang L, Han Q, Nan L, Yang H. Impact of narrative nursing cognition, self-efficacy, and social support on the practices of registered nurses in China: a structural equation modeling analysis. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):624.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wanzhen MA, Ping GU, Jingjing ZHANG. YI Huaixiu.Development of the narrative competence scale and its test of reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Nurs 2020,55(4):578–83. Wanzhen MA, Ping GU, Jingjing ZHANG. YI Huaixiu.Development of the narrative competence scale and its test of reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Nurs 2020,55(4):578–83.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ et al. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy:development and preliminary psychometric data[J]. Educ Psychol Meas 2001,61(2):349–65. Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ et al. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy:development and preliminary psychometric data[J]. Educ Psychol Meas 2001,61(2):349–65.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mostafa A, Hoque R, Mostafa M, Rana MM, Mostafa F. Empathy in undergraduate medical students of Bangladesh: psychometric analysis and differences by gender, academic year, and specialty preferences. ISRN Psychiatry. 2014;2014:1–7.CrossRef Mostafa A, Hoque R, Mostafa M, Rana MM, Mostafa F. Empathy in undergraduate medical students of Bangladesh: psychometric analysis and differences by gender, academic year, and specialty preferences. ISRN Psychiatry. 2014;2014:1–7.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Assing Hvidt E, Søndergaard J, Wehberg S, Hvidt NC, Andersen CM. A cross-sectional study of student empathy across four medical schools in Denmark-associations between empathy level and age, sex, specialty preferences and motivation. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Assing Hvidt E, Søndergaard J, Wehberg S, Hvidt NC, Andersen CM. A cross-sectional study of student empathy across four medical schools in Denmark-associations between empathy level and age, sex, specialty preferences and motivation. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Laughey WF, Atkinson J, Craig AM, et al. Empathy in Medical Education: its Nature and nurture - a qualitative study of the views of students and tutors. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(6):1941–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Laughey WF, Atkinson J, Craig AM, et al. Empathy in Medical Education: its Nature and nurture - a qualitative study of the views of students and tutors. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(6):1941–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu Y, Wan X, Sun C, Ji Y, Zhao X, Cai Y, Cao X. Medical narrative ability and humanistic care ability of Chinese clinical nurses: the mediating role of empathy ability. J Eval Clin Pract. 2025;31(1):e14046.CrossRefPubMed Yu Y, Wan X, Sun C, Ji Y, Zhao X, Cai Y, Cao X. Medical narrative ability and humanistic care ability of Chinese clinical nurses: the mediating role of empathy ability. J Eval Clin Pract. 2025;31(1):e14046.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozdemir C, Kaplan A. Examining nurses’ humanistic behaviour ability and empathy levels in clinical practice: a descriptive and exploratory study. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33(8):3115–27.CrossRefPubMed Ozdemir C, Kaplan A. Examining nurses’ humanistic behaviour ability and empathy levels in clinical practice: a descriptive and exploratory study. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33(8):3115–27.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Xue M, Sun H, Xue J, et al. Narrative medicine as a teaching strategy for nursing students to developing professionalism, empathy and humanistic caring ability: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xue M, Sun H, Xue J, et al. Narrative medicine as a teaching strategy for nursing students to developing professionalism, empathy and humanistic caring ability: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Daryazadeh S, Adibi P, Yamani N, Mollabashi R. Impact of narrative medicine program on improving reflective capacity and empathy of medical students in Iran. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Daryazadeh S, Adibi P, Yamani N, Mollabashi R. Impact of narrative medicine program on improving reflective capacity and empathy of medical students in Iran. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cosper P, Kaplow R, Moss J. The impact of patient and family advisors on critical care nurses’ Empathy. JONA J Nurs Adm. 2018;48(12):622.CrossRef Cosper P, Kaplow R, Moss J. The impact of patient and family advisors on critical care nurses’ Empathy. JONA J Nurs Adm. 2018;48(12):622.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonvicini KA, Perlin MJ, Bylund CL, Carroll G, Rouse RA, Goldstein MG. Impact of communication training on physician expression of empathy in patient encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75(1):3–10.CrossRefPubMed Bonvicini KA, Perlin MJ, Bylund CL, Carroll G, Rouse RA, Goldstein MG. Impact of communication training on physician expression of empathy in patient encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75(1):3–10.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat García D, Bautista O, Venereo L, Coll O, Vassena R, Vernaeve V. Training in empathic skills improves the patient-physician relationship during the first consultation in a fertility clinic. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(5):1413–e14181.CrossRefPubMed García D, Bautista O, Venereo L, Coll O, Vassena R, Vernaeve V. Training in empathic skills improves the patient-physician relationship during the first consultation in a fertility clinic. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(5):1413–e14181.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen PJ, Huang CD, Yeh SJ. Impact of a narrative mediine programme on healthcare providers’ empathy scores over time. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen PJ, Huang CD, Yeh SJ. Impact of a narrative mediine programme on healthcare providers’ empathy scores over time. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemay M, Encandela J, Sanders L, Reisman A. Writing well: the long-term effect on Empathy, Observation, and Physician writing through a Residency writers’ workshop. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(3):357–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lemay M, Encandela J, Sanders L, Reisman A. Writing well: the long-term effect on Empathy, Observation, and Physician writing through a Residency writers’ workshop. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(3):357–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang CD, Jenq CC, Liao KC, Lii SC, Huang CH, Wang TY. How does narrative medicine impact medical trainees’ learning of professionalism? A qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):391.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang CD, Jenq CC, Liao KC, Lii SC, Huang CH, Wang TY. How does narrative medicine impact medical trainees’ learning of professionalism? A qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):391.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Han Q, Nan L, et al. Barriers and facilitators to narrative nursing implementation for junior nurses: a qualitative study. Medicine. 2024;103(40):e39922.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang L, Han Q, Nan L, et al. Barriers and facilitators to narrative nursing implementation for junior nurses: a qualitative study. Medicine. 2024;103(40):e39922.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Li N, Tong C, Zhang M, et al. Correlation between empathy ability and job burnout among emergency nurses. J Nurs Sci. 2016;31(4):61–6. Li N, Tong C, Zhang M, et al. Correlation between empathy ability and job burnout among emergency nurses. J Nurs Sci. 2016;31(4):61–6.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosseinabadi EMH, Khanjani N, Biganeh J, Mohammadi S, Abdolahfard M. The effects of amplitude and stability of circadian rhythm and occupational stress on burnout syndrome and job dissatisfaction among irregular shift working nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28:1868–78.CrossRef Hosseinabadi EMH, Khanjani N, Biganeh J, Mohammadi S, Abdolahfard M. The effects of amplitude and stability of circadian rhythm and occupational stress on burnout syndrome and job dissatisfaction among irregular shift working nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28:1868–78.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The moderating effect of working years on nurses’ medical narrative ability and empathy ability: a cross-sectional survey study
verfasst von
Hailing Qiu
Jie Huang
Tingzhi Li
Chao Yang
Yingyan Pan
Wanying Su
Qiong Qi
Fanling Li
Jing Yang
Yajuan Wu
Siqi Zhang
Jie Wen
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2025
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2025
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02824-4