Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
Zeitschriften Fortbildung Hebammen Bücher Kongresse & Live-Webinare
Social Media - Folgen Sie uns!
Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Hebammen
Service
Jobbörse Kundenservice Info & Hilfe
Fokus-Themen
Chronisch-entzündliche Darmerkrankung COVID-19-Update Diabetes Hautpflege Klima & Gesundheit Hygiene Intensivpflege Kardiologische Pflege Mobilisation Nachhaltigkeit Nierenerkrankungen Obstipation Onkologische Pflege Palliativpflege Schmerz Sucht in der Pflege Vielfalt, Gleichberechtigung und Inklusion Wundversorgung
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin
Erschienen in:

01.08.2013 | Editorial

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) process for developing guidelines

Current status

verfasst von: J. Nolan

Erschienen in: Notfall + Rettungsmedizin | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

It is now almost three years since publication of the 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) Science with Treatment Recommendations [1, 2]. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) has facilitated 5-yearly comprehensive reviews of resuscitation science since 2000 [3]. ILCOR currently includes representatives from the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC), the Australian and New Zealand Committee on Resuscitation (ANZCOR), Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa (RCSA), the InterAmerican Heart Foundation (IAHF), and the Resuscitation Council of Asia (RCA) [4]. The 2010 Consensus on CPR Science publication provided broad treatment recommendations where these could be agreed. More detailed guidelines were published by the ILCOR member organisations and, although consistent with the science in the consensus document, they took into account geographic, economic and system differences [5, 6]. …
Nächster Artikel Laienreanimation
Literatur
1.
Nolan JP, Hazinski MF, Billi JE et al (2010) 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Part 1: Executive Summary. Resuscitation 81:e1–e25PubMedCrossRef
2.
Hazinski MF, Nolan JP, Billi JE et al (2010) Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 122:S250–275PubMedCrossRef
3.
American Heart Association in collaboration with International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (2000) Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 102(suppl):I1–I384
4.
Nolan JP, Nadkarni VM, Billi JE et al (2010) 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Part 2: International Collaboration in Resuscitation Science. Resuscitation 81:e26–e31PubMedCrossRef
5.
Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA et al (2010) European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010. Section 1. Executive Summary. Resuscitation 81:1219–1276PubMedCrossRef
6.
Field JM, Hazinski MF, Sayre MR et al (2010) Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 122:S640–656PubMedCrossRef
7.
Brozek JL, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P et al (2009) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy 64:669–677PubMedCrossRef
8.
Brozek JL, Akl EA, Compalati E et al (2011) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations. Allergy 66:588–595PubMedCrossRef
9.
Brozek JL, Akl EA, Jaeschke R et al (2009) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies. Allergy 64:1109–1116PubMedCrossRef
10.
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64:383–394PubMedCrossRef
11.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Santesso N et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 66:158–172PubMedCrossRef
12.
Hsu J, Brozek JL, Terracciano L et al (2011) Application of GRADE: making evidence-based recommendations about diagnostic tests in clinical practice guidelines. Implement Sci 6:62PubMedCrossRef
13.
Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Tetroe J. (2004) Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications. J Contin Educ Health Prof 24 Suppl 1:S31–37CrossRef
14.
Brooks SC, Morrison LJ. (2008) Implementation of therapeutic hypothermia guidelines for post-cardiac arrest syndrome at a glacial pace: seeking guidance from the knowledge translation literature. Resuscitation 77:286–292PubMedCrossRef
15.
Kudenchuk PJ, Redshaw JD, Stubbs BA et al (2012) Impact of changes in resuscitation practice on survival and neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resulting from nonshockable arrhythmias. Circulation 125:1787–1794PubMedCrossRef
16.
Hasegawa K, Hiraide A, Chang Y, Brown DF. (2013) Association of prehospital advanced airway management with neurologic outcome and survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 309:257–266PubMedCrossRef
17.
Hanif MA, Kaji AH, Niemann JT. (2010) Advanced airway management does not improve outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Acad Emerg Med 17:926–931PubMedCrossRef
18.
Olasveengen TM, Sunde K, Brunborg C, Thowsen J, Steen PA, Wik L. (2009) Intravenous drug administration during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial. JAMA 302:2222–2229PubMedCrossRef
19.
Jacobs IG, Finn JC, Jelinek GA, Oxer HF, Thompson PL. (2011) Effect of adrenaline on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Resuscitation 82:1138-43.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Hagihara A, Hasegawa M, Abe T, Nagata T, Wakata Y, Miyazaki S. (2012) Prehospital epinephrine use and survival among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 307:1161–1168PubMedCrossRef
21.
Olasveengen TM, Wik L, Sunde K, Steen PA. (2012) Outcome when adrenaline (epinephrine) was actually given vs. not given - post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Resuscitation 83:327–332PubMedCrossRef
22.
Lerner EB, Persse D, Souders CM et al (2011) Design of the Circulation Improving Resuscitation Care (CIRC) Trial: a new state of the art design for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest research. Resuscitation 82:294–299PubMedCrossRef
23.
Rubertsson S, Silfverstolpe J, Rehn L et al (2013) The study protocol for the LINC (LUCAS in cardiac arrest) study: a study comparing conventional adult out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a concept with mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 21:5PubMedCrossRef
24.
Perkins GD, Woollard M, Cooke MW et al (2010) Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in cardiac arrest (PaRAMeDIC) trial protocol. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 18:58PubMedCrossRef
25.
Aufderheide TP, Frascone RJ, Wayne MA et al (2011) Standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised trial. Lancet 377:30–311CrossRef
26.
Aufderheide TP, Nichol G, Rea TD et al (2011) A trial of an impedance threshold device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 365:798–806PubMedCrossRef
27.
Kagawa E, Dote K, Kato M et al (2012) Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiac arrest? Rapid-response extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-arrest percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 126:1605–1613PubMedCrossRef
28.
Maekawa K, Tanno K, Hase M, Mori K, Asai Y. (2013) Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin: a propensity-matched study and predictor analysis*. Crit Care Med 41:1186–1196PubMedCrossRef
29.
Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, al-Subaie N et al (2012) Target Temperature Management after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—a randomized, parallel-group, assessor-blinded clinical trial—rationale and design. Am Heart J 163:541–548PubMedCrossRef
30.
Bouwes A, Binnekade JM, Kuiper MA et al (2012) Prognosis of coma after therapeutic hypothermia: a prospective cohort study. Ann Neurol 71:206–212PubMedCrossRef
31.
Bouwes A, van Poppelen D, Koelman JH et al (2012) Acute posthypoxic myoclonus after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. BMC Neurol 12:63PubMedCrossRef
32.
Cronberg T, Brizzi M, Liedholm LJ et al (2013) Neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest. Recommendations from the Swedish Resuscitation Council. Resuscitation 84:867–872PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) process for developing guidelines
Current status
verfasst von
J. Nolan
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 1434-6222
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-0578
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-012-1680-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

Infektionsschutzrecht

  • Medizinrecht

Die Realität der Sichtung

  • Originalien

ARC

  • Mitteilungen

Ein Leben Retten – 100 Pro Reanimation

  • Leitthema

Nutzen und Sicherheit von privat vorgehaltenen automatisierten externen Defibrillatoren in häuslicher Umgebung

  • Notfall aktuell - Für Sie gelesen

DGINA

  • Mitteilungen