Introduction
Burnout is a condition and a psychological syndrome defined as emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment related to work stressors [
1]. A wealth of research has confirmed that burnout occurs frequently in health care professionals, including doctors, nurses and social workers, among whom, nurses are especially susceptible to burnout [
2]. From previous studies, 54%-68.3% of nurses are deem to burnout [
3,
4], leading to psychosomatic symptoms such as decreased energy, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and negative evaluation of personal accomplishments [
5,
6]. In addition, nurse burnout can independently predict patient safety, adverse events [
7], and increased hospital infections [
8].
Palliative care is a care approach provided to patients (and families) with life-threatening illness that aims to identify, assess, and treat pain and other problems, including physical, mental and spiritual issues, to improve their quality of life [
9]. Palliative care work is considered to be innately challenging. Nurses working in palliative units provide services to patients in the terminal period and their families and are more frequently exposed to grief, suffering and death than other medical staff are [
10]. As a result, palliative nurses seem to face more emotional distress and psychological problems than general nurses do, and many studies have demonstrated that nurses working in palliative units have higher levels of burnout [
11,
12].
Burnout in palliative nurses may result in a negative attitude towards palliative care, increased turnover rates, decreased nursing care quality, and reduced hospitalization satisfaction among patients [
3,
13], which may indirectly hinder the development of palliative care. According to the WHO, an estimated 40 million people need palliative care each year (WHO, 2020), and China may account for a relatively large part of this figure, given its population of more than 1.4 billion [
14]. However, palliative care is developing relatively slowly in China, and hospice care services covers only 10% of the population [
15]. In addition to the policy and legal situations, the cultural context in China may account for it. Confucian culture holds the perspective that “life and death are preordained” and attributed to fate [
16], resulting in a lack of attention to palliative care. In addition, talking about death is somewhat taboo in traditional Chinese culture [
16], and palliative nurses may have difficulty confiding in their family and friends about emotional problems caused by their end-of-life care work. These situations suggest that palliative nurses in China may tend to experience job burnout to a certain degree, and their negative attitudes could be an important factor in the poor quality of Chinese palliative care [
17]. Therefore, paying close attention to Chinese palliative nurses’ burnout is urgent.
In previous studies, some individual features, such as age [
18], personality [
19] and inner resilience [
20], and some social-occupational factors, including years of experience [
21], social support [
22] and job training [
12], have been demonstrated to be factors of nurse burnout. However, few studies have been conducted in palliative contexts, and to our knowledge, no studies have focused on the influencing factors of burnout in Chinese palliative nurses. Considering the relevant large difference in Chinese conditions and culture compared with other countries, it is necessary to fill this gap. Thus, we conducted this cross-sectional study to 1) investigate burnout status among Chinese palliative nurses, and 2) to identify the factors associated with burnout.
Methods
Design, setting, and participants
A cross-sectional design with convenience sampling method was performed in this study. From May 2021 to September 2021, we investigated a total of 340 palliative nurses from 25 hospitals or healthcare institutions in 8 cities, and 331 questionnaires were recycled; the response rate was 97.35%. Two independent researchers used an author-designed Excel spreadsheet for data entry, and this was verified by a third researcher. This study was part of our cross-sectional study about palliative nurses in China, other details about participants’ selection process please see our previous work [
23].
Procedure
After acquiring permissions to conduct this study from the nurse managers of each selected hospitals or healthcare institutions, two well-trained researchers assigned the questionnaires to palliative nurses by face. Subjective information was collected in the form of paper questionnaires, and objective information was obtained through the personnel management system with the help of human resource managers. Staff meetings were regularly conducted under the lead of nursing managers in each participating palliative unit to promote the data collection process and to ensure the response rate. The signed informed consent forms and the completed questionnaires were required to return together and were accessible only to researchers of this study.
Sample size
The sample size was analysed using G*power 3.1 software, and the linear multiple regression algorithm was selected. There were 21 variables, including 12 sociodemographic characteristics and nine scale-associated dimensions, in this study. With 95% confidence intervals and 0.8 power, the minimum sample size in our study was 160. Considering a possible 15% wastage rate, a total of 188 participants were needed.
Measures
Social-demographic characteristics
We used a self-designed questionnaire to collect information on the participants’ social-demographic characteristics, including their gender, age, educational level, marital status, religion, health condition, chronic disease, family support, professional title, years of work experience, monthly income, income satisfaction, and participation in end-of-life care training.
Burnout and pessimistic personality
The burnout and pessimistic personality subscales of the Chinese version of Nursing Burnout Scale (NBS) was used to assess burnout and pessimistic personality of participants in this study [
24]. This scale uses a 4-point Likert scale with response options ranging from 1 referring to “strongly disagree” to 4 referring to “strongly agree”. The 12-item burnout subscale comprises of 3 dimensions of nurse burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, reduced personal accomplishment), with each dimension comprising 4 items. The total scores ranged from 12–48 points, and a higher score reflected a higher level of burnout. In this study, the Cronbach’s α the three dimensions were 0.91, 0.85, and 0.88, respectively. The 12-item personality subscale has the total scores ranged from 12–48 points, with higher scores indicating that the participants were more likely to have pessimistic personality. The Cronbach’s α of the scale in this study was 0.76.
Social support
The Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) was used to measure nurses’ social support [
25]. The scale comprises 12 self-report items, providing a subjective assessment of the individual’s social support from his or her family, friends and other connections. A Likert-type scoring (1–2-3–4-5–6-7) is applied, and the total scores range from 12 to 84 points, with higher scores indicating more social support perceived by participants. The Cronbach’s α for the PSSS was 0.96 in this study.
Self-efficacy
We used the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) to assess self-efficacy among palliative nurses. The Chinese version [
26] of the GSES is a 10-item single-dimension scale, and each item is scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale (1 = not true at all, 2 = true, 3 = mostly true, 4 = totally true), with total scores ranging from 10–40 points. A total score less than 20 points is classified as a low level of self-efficacy, 20–30 points is a medium level of self-efficacy, and more than 30 points is identified as a high level of self-efficacy. The GSES has been proven to have acceptable internal reliability, and the Cronbach’s α of the scale in this study was 0.90.
Resilience
The resilience level of nurses was measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). This scale is a 25-item Guttman scale assessing 3 domains, including tenacity, strength and optimism, with response options ranging from 0–4 (0 = not true at all, 1 = rarely true, 2 = sometimes true, 3 = often true, 4 = always true). The total score ranges from 0–100, and a higher score indicates a higher level of resilience. The Chinese version of the CD-RISC has been proven to have acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.75) and could be a screening tool for resilience [
27]. In this study, Cronbach’s α was 0.95.
Coping style
Coping style was evaluated using the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). The SCSQ was developed by Xie in 1998 [
28] and consists of 20 items focusing on coping cognitive and behavioural patterns over 2 domains: the positive coping dimension (items 1–12) and the negative coping dimension (items 13–20). The items are rated using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 for “not used” to 3 for “used a great deal”. The average scores of the two dimensions were calculated, and the higher the average score of the dimension was, the greater the tendency to adopt the coping style. In this study, the Cronbach’s α of the SCSQ and its 2 dimensions were 0.86, 0.87 (positive coping dimension) and 0.85 (negative coping dimension).
Statistical analysis
We used SPSS 26.0 for data analysis. Skewness and kurtosis were used for normality tests. The variables were determined to have a normal distribution when the skewness value ≤ 2 or the kurtosis value ≤ 4 [
29], and we found that our data (scores for emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, reduced personal accomplishment, pessimistic personality, social support, self-efficacy and coping style) were normally distributed. The independent-sample t test (dichotomous variables) and one-way ANOVA (polytomous variables) were conducted for univariate analysis. Correlations among dimensions of subscales were analysed using Pearson correlation analysis. Finally, multiple linear regression analysis was carried out to separately test the related factors of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment dimensions. We chose stepwise regression analysis to minimize the multicollinearity effect (“the alpha to enter” and “the alpha to remove” were set as 0.05 and 0.1, respectively). The multicollinearity in this regression model was checked using tolerance, and the variance inflation factor (VIF), with tolerance < 0.1 or VIF > 10, indicated multicollinearity. The result was considered statistically significant when the two-tailed
p value was less than 0.05.
Results
Characteristics of participants
As shown in Table
1. The mean age and the mean years of work experience of the 319 nurses were 30.88 ± 7.22 years and 5.88 ± 5.9 years, respectively. Most of the participants were female (98.43%), and the majority were married (62.70%). The most common educational level was undergraduate or above (53.61%), and the most common professional title was junior nurse (73.89%). Only one-third of participants (31.39%) reported being satisfied with their income.
Table 1
Patients’ characteristics
Age | 30.88 | 7.22 |
Length of working service | 5.88 | 5.9 |
Gender |
Male | 5 | 1.57% |
Female | 314 | 98.43% |
Educational level |
Junior college | 148 | 46.39% |
Undergraduate and above | 171 | 53.61% |
Marital status |
Unmarried | 119 | 37.30% |
Married | 200 | 62.70% |
Religion |
Yes | 17 | 5.33 |
No | 302 | 94.67% |
Health condition |
Very bad | 4 | 1.25% |
Bad | 10 | 3.13% |
General | 139 | 43.57% |
Good | 124 | 38.87% |
Very good | 42 | 13.17% |
Chronic disease |
Yes | 33 | 10.34% |
No | 286 | 89.66% |
Professional title |
Junior | 236 | 73.98% |
Intermediate and above | 83 | 26.02% |
Monthly income |
< 3,000 yuan (US, $500) | 49 | 15.36% |
3,000–5,000 yuan (US, $500–$830) | 137 | 42.95% |
5,000–7,000 yuan (US, $830–$1,160) | 92 | 28.84% |
7,000–9,000 yuan (US, $1,160–$1,500) | 35 | 10.97% |
≥ 9,000 yuan (US, $1,500) | 6 | 1.88% |
Income satisfaction |
Very bad | 9 | 2.82% |
Bad | 53 | 16.61% |
General | 157 | 49.22% |
Good | 86 | 26.96% |
Very good | 14 | 4.39% |
Participate in end-of-life care training |
Yes | 258 | 80.88% |
No | 61 | 19.12% |
Burnout (total) | 23.4 | 7.68 |
Emotional exhaustion | 8.66 | 3.04 |
Depersonalization | 7.46 | 2.58 |
Reduced personal accomplishment | 7.29 | 2.83 |
Pessimistic personality | 30.89 | 3.85 |
Social support | 61.26 | 11.73 |
Self-efficacy | 23.36 | 5.30 |
Resilience | 57.12 | 14.60 |
Coping style |
Positive dimension | 2.00 | 0.59 |
Negative dimension | 1.32 | 0.65 |
The mean scores of burnout total and emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment dimensions were 23.4 ± 7.68, 8.66 ± 3.04, 7.46 ± 2.58, and 7.29 ± 2.83, respectively. The mean score of pessimistic personality was 30.89 ± 3.85. In addition, the mean scores of social support, self-efficacy and resilience were 61.26 ± 11.73, 23.36 ± 5.30, and 57.12 ± 14.60, respectively, suggesting that palliative nurses in this study generally had high levels of social support and moderate levels of self-efficacy and resilience [
25‐
27]. For the coping style, the mean scores for the positive dimension and negative dimension were 2.00 ± 0.59 and 1.32 ± 0.65, respectively, which means that most palliative nurses tend to adopt a positive coping style [
28].
Bivariate analysis between nurse burnout and sociodemographic variables
Bivariate analysis results suggested that educational level, health condition, family support, income satisfaction and end-of-life care training were statistically significantly associated with all three dimensions (
p < 0.05) (Table
2).
Table 2
Bivariate analyses a
Educational level | | 2.343* | | | 2.225* | | | 2.455* | |
Junior college | 9.08 ± 2.95 | | | 7.80 ± 2.63 | | | 7.70 ± 2.74 | | |
Undergraduate and above | 8.29 ± 3.08 | | | 7.16 ± 2.50 | | | 6.93 ± 2.86 | | |
Health condition | | | 7.695** | | | 6.098** | | | 8.043** |
Very bad | 15.00 ± 1.16 | | | 12.50 ± 3.11 | | | 14.00 ± 3.37 | | |
Bad | 10.10 ± 3.84 | | | 8.50 ± 2.59 | | | 7.80 ± 3.39 | | |
General | 9.06 ± 3.00 | | | 7.74 ± 2.51 | | | 7.60 ± 2.77 | | |
Good | 8.00 ± 2.84 | | | 7.06 ± 2.35 | | | 6.73 ± 2.61 | | |
Very good | 8.31 ± 2.75 | | | 7.00 ± 2.84 | | | 7.12 ± 2.56 | | |
Income satisfaction | | | 8.458*** | | | 3.218*** | | | 6.401*** |
Very bad | 11.67 ± 4.44 | | | 8.22 ± 3.99 | | | 9.44 ± 4.80 | | |
Bad | 9.72 ± 3.02 | | | 7.79 ± 2.44 | | | 8.26 ± 2.94 | | |
General | 8.83 ± 2.83 | | | 7.71 ± 2.50 | | | 7.34 ± 2.65 | | |
Good | 7.72 ± 2.81 | | | 7.02 ± 2.49 | | | 6.74 ± 2.55 | | |
Very good | 6.50 ± 2.79 | | | 5.64 ± 2.68 | | | 5.00 ± 2.29 | | |
Participate in end-of-life care training | | -2.359* | | | -2.047* | | | -2.149* | |
Yes | 8.46 ± 3.06 | | | 7.32 ± 2.55 | | | 7.12 ± 2.79 | | |
No | 9.48 ± 2.84 | | | 8.07 ± 2.65 | | | 7.98 ± 2.89 | | |
Correlations of burnout among palliative nurses
The results of Pearson correlation analyses are presented in Table
3. Among the three subscales, the correlations were statistically significant (
r = 0.699,
r = 0.742,
r = 0.762, all
p < 0.01). Among the three dimensions, there were five common influencing factors. Specifically, pessimistic personality and negative coping style were positively correlated with emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment (
r > 0,
p < 0.01). In addition, social support, resilience and positive coping style were negatively correlated with three dimensions (
r < 0,
p < 0.01), while no statistically significant correlations were found among the three dimensions and self-efficacy, age and years of work experience.
Table 3
Results of Pearson correlations analysis
Emotional exhaustion | 1 | | | | | | | | |
Depersonalization | 0.699** | 1 | | | | | | | |
Reduced personal accomplishment | 0.742** | 0.762** | 1 | | | | | | |
Pessimistic personality | 0.245** | 0.176** | 0.202** | 1 | | | | | |
Social support | -0.229** | -0.273** | -0.274** | -0.024 | 1 | | | | |
Self-efficacy | -0.116* | -0.080 | -0.012 | 0.146** | 0.125* | 1 | | | |
Resilience | -0.365** | -0.301** | -0.287** | 0.007 | 0.302** | 0.601** | 1 | | |
Positive coping | -0.248** | -0.236** | -0.307** | -0.028 | 0.281** | 0.298** | 0.497** | 1 | |
Negative coping | 0.306** | 0.272** | 0.320** | 0.048 | 0.016 | 0.361** | 0.21** | 0.182** | 1 |
Multiple linear regression results of nurse burnout
In this study, we included variables with statistically significant correlations in the bivariate analysis and Pearson correlation analysis into multiple linear regression analyses for the three dimensions. In addition, age was included as a common confounding variable [
30]. The multiple linear regression results of the relationships among the three dimensions and selected variables in palliative nurses are listed in Table
4.
Table 4
Multiple liner regression results of nurse burnout
Emotional exhaustion | Constant | 8.163 | | | 0.399 | 0.386 | 29.539*** |
Resilience | -0.068 | -0.325 | -6.171*** | | | |
Negative coping | 1.743 | 0.370 | 8.083*** | | | |
Pessimistic personality | 0.182 | 0.230 | 5.188*** | | | |
Income satisfaction | -0.518 | -0.143 | -3.070** | | | |
Health condition | -0.496 | -0.131 | -2.824** | | | |
Positive coping | -0.470 | -0.105 | -2.049* | | | |
Training | 0.681 | 0.088 | 1.987* | | | |
Depersonalization | Constant | 9.184 | | | 0.291 | 0.278 | 21.367*** |
Resilience | -0.043 | -0.244 | -4.253*** | | | |
Negative coping | 1.352 | 0.338 | 6.881*** | | | |
Social support | -0.033 | -0.148 | -2.906** | | | |
Pessimistic personality | 0.111 | 0.166 | 3.453** | | | |
Health condition | -0.448 | -0.140 | -2.839** | | | |
Positive coping | -0.430 | -0.113 | -2.017* | | | |
Reduced personal accomplishment | Constant | 9.099 | | | 0.360 | 0.345 | 24.961*** |
Negative coping | 1.682 | 0.380 | 8.043*** | | | |
Positive coping | -0.923 | -0.219 | -4.100*** | | | |
Resilience | -0.035 | -0.179 | -3.268** | | | |
Pessimistic personality | 0.133 | 0.179 | 3.922*** | | | |
Income satisfaction | -0.358 | -0.105 | -2.172* | | | |
Social support | -0.030 | -0.123 | -2.509* | | | |
Health condition | -0.375 | -0.105 | -2.204* | | | |
The results indicated that resilience, coping style, and pessimistic personality were common related factors of three dimensions (p < 0.05), with resilience (β = -0.325, β = -0.244, β = -0.179, all p < 0.01) and positive coping (β = -0.105, β = -0.113, β = -0.219, all p < 0.01) presented as negative factors, while pessimistic personality (β = 0.230, β = 0.166, β = 0.179, all p < 0.01) and negative coping (β = 0.370, β = 0.338, β = 0.380, all p < 0.01) were presented as positive factors. Regarding the emotional exhaustion model (R 2 = 0.399, adjusted R 2 = 0.386, F = 29.539, p < 0.01), income satisfaction (β = -0.143, p = 0.001) and end-of-life care training (no compared yes, β = 0.088, p = 0.048) were also related factors, and a total of 38.6% of the variance could be explained. In the depersonalization model (R 2 = 0.291, adjusted R 2 = 0.278, F = 21.367, p < 0.01), social support also reflected a related factor, and 27.8% of the total variance was explained. In the reduced personal accomplishment model (R 2 = 0.360, adjusted R 2 = 0.345, F = 24.961, p < 0.01), income satisfaction and social support were also revealed as related factors, and a total of 34.5% of the variance was explained. There was no multicollinearity found in the three models.
Conclusion
This study identified the factors associated with burnout among Chinese palliative nurses. The results revealed that resilience, pessimistic personality, coping strategy and health condition are common factors of three dimensions; in addition, income satisfaction, end-of-life care training, and social support can also affect burnout. In palliative nurse recruitment, personality and health condition can be considered as part of the profession’s entry qualifications. In addition, strategies for reducing burnout include taking culture-oriented training programs (death education, resilience cultivation, and coping skills promotion), providing perceived support resources, and building a reasonable salary system; these can help decrease palliative nurses’ burnout, increase the quality of nursing and promote the development of Chinese palliative care.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.