Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2025 | Research

Practice of core competence training for orthopedic nurses in Hunan Province of China

verfasst von: Yang Zhou, Yabin Guo, Liya Huang, Biyun Zeng

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2025

Abstract Objectives Methods Results Conclusion

This study aims to present a preliminary exploration of an orthopedic nurse specialist training program in Hunan Province, China, and to explore the effectiveness of training.
The training programme consisted of one month of theoretical training and two months of clinical practice training. The training content was set around four modules: theoretical knowledge, professional skills, comprehensive practice, and professional development. The application effect of the curriculum was examined via a nonrandomized controlled experimental study. From December 2022 to December 2023, a total of 102 orthopedic specialist nurses from the selected training bases were trained, and we evaluated the effectiveness of the training by using the reaction, learning, behavioral, and results layers of Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation model. Before and after the training, the core competencies of the training participants were evaluated via the Core Competencies Questionnaire for Orthopedic Nurse Specialists, and paired t tests were used to compare the core competencies before and after the training.
In total, 102 trainees in Hunan Province participated in the training program. The final score of the training trainees was 89.01 ± 2.16. All trainees passed theoretical and clinical practice examinations and trainee evaluations. Their core competencies significantly improved after training (P < 0.001). The overall satisfaction rate of the trainees with the theoretical and practical courses was 100%.
The orthopedic nurse specialist training program demonstrated science and effectiveness and improved the core competencies of nurses in providing orthopedic specialist care. The curriculum system is comprehensive and reliable and can be used as a reference for training orthopedic specialty nurses.
Hinweise
Yang Zhou and Yabin Guo contributed equally to this study.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Orthopedic disorders are among the top five related conditions that lead to extraordinarily long hospital stays for patients [1]. Orthopedic trauma is the 3rd leading cause of death in China in addition to stroke and coronary heart disease, with more than 60 billion RMB spent on trauma treatment every year [2]. In addition, the prevalence of osteoarthritis, another orthopedic disorder, ranging from 19.2–43.7% [1], globally, more than one million joint replacement surgeries are performed each year to treat end-stage osteoarthritis [3]. The National Nursing Career Development Plan (2021–2025) issued by the National Health Commission [4] puts forward the main tasks during the “14th Five-Year Plan” period, including “developing a team of specialized nurses and improving the level of specialized nursing care”. With the increasing refinement and complexity of the orthopedic system, training high-level, applied, and specialized advanced practice orthopedic nurse specialists with strong core competencies and comprehensive qualities is necessary.
Orthopedic nurse specialist training aims to develop the core competence of nurses. Nurses’ core competencies are at the heart of nursing education and play a key role in ensuring high-quality services [5]. The core competencies of orthopedic nurse specialists refer to the in-depth clinical skills, profound theoretical knowledge, and strong overall competence necessary for nurses who have obtained orthopedic specialist qualifications to provide high-quality nursing care in the field of orthopedic care [6]. The current core competency evaluation system for orthopedic nurse specialists established by Luo et al. has a high degree of practicality [7]. The ratio of theoretical to practical training time for orthopedic nurse specialists is mostly 1:2, i.e., one month of theoretical learning and two months of clinical practice [6].
In China, orthopedic nursing is not a prominent focus within the educational curriculum and is conventionally addressed solely as a subsection within the domain of surgical nursing. As a result, orthopedic nurses may have limitations due to inadequate knowledge and skills. In recent years, some specialized orthopedic nurse training has been carried out in Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, and other places in China. For example, Liu et al. explored the application of a nursing outcome-oriented case management model in the training of orthopedic specialty nurses, and the results revealed that nurses’ standardization and accuracy in a nursing examination, nursing diagnosis, nursing measures, and evaluation of outcomes improved [8]. Tong explored the impact of orthopedic specialist nurse training on the development of orthopedic surgery in Jiangsu Province, and the results revealed that the quality of orthopedic nursing care improved while promoting the popularization and homogenization of new knowledge and skills in orthopedic nursing in the province [9].
However, training for orthopedic nurses has several limitations. First, there is no unified training program for orthopedic nurse specialists in the country. Second, there is a lack of training for orthopedic nurses’ innovation and scientific research ability in the context of training content. Third, systematic and professional evaluation theories to guide the evaluation of the effectiveness of orthopedic nurse specialist training are lacking. Most training is conducted only in the form of self-generated question papers, and the scientific and representative nature of the assessment content is poor.
Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation Model (Kirkpatrick model) provides new ideas for evaluating training effectiveness. Kirkpatrick model is derived from the corporate training effectiveness evaluation model in business management [10, 11]. The Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation Model was proposed by Donald Kirkpatrick, former president of the American Society for Training and Development (ASTD) and Emeritus Professor at the University of Wisconsin [10]. The Kirkpatrick model comprises a four-tiered sequential framework. Level 1 (Reaction) evaluates participants’ satisfaction and engagement with the training program, encompassing their perceptions of the instructors, methods, content, and personal benefits. Level 2 (Learning) assesses the acquisition of new knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Level 3 (Behavior) measures the application of learned knowledge in the workplace. Level 4 (Results) evaluates the training’s impact on organizational outcomes and economic benefits. Johnston et al. [12] conducted a single-group, pre-post quasi-experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of a training program for nurses on using augmentative and alternative communication strategies with intubated patients, utilizing the Kirkpatrick Model for assessment. Currently, Kirkpatrick model has been applied in the research of core competency evaluation index systems for nurses in specialties such as midwifery [8], infection [13], and critical care medicine [14], but there are no reports on the application of the core competency training effect for orthopedic nurses specializing in orthopedics.
To promote the scientific and homogeneous training of orthopedic specialist nurses, Hunan Province established the Hunan Orthopedic Specialist Nurse Training Base in 2018. To establish a reasonable training curriculum for orthopedic nurse specialists, this study conducted a preliminary survey on orthopedic nurse specialists’ qualifications training expectations and training strategies [15], set up a training curriculum, and developed a core competency evaluation questionnaire in conjunction with the core competencies of orthopedic nurse specialists as required by Luo et al. [7]. This study aimed to evaluate the training effect of orthopedic nurse specialists on the basis of Kirkpatrick model and to explore the changes in the core competencies of orthopedic nurses before and after training to provide a reference for improving the training standardization of orthopedic nurses specializing in orthopedics.

Methods

One hundred and two nurses from hospitals in 14 cities/states in Hunan Province who participated in training at the Hunan Orthopedic Nurse Specialist Training Base from December 2022 to December 2023 were recruited for the study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University.

Trainees

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) nursing staff qualifications: participants must hold intermediate, senior, or chief professional ranks. Alternatively, nurses with junior professional ranks were eligible if they had a minimum of three years of orthopedic clinical experience; (2) training completion: individuals who completed the entire training program without any interruptions; (3) consent: volunteers who provided written informed consent.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) nurses who terminated their participation prematurely; (2) individuals who did not participate in all required assessments and surveys.

Training bases

The Hunan Provincial Training Base for Orthopedic Nurse Specialists is affiliated with the Department of Orthopedics at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Since its establishment in 2018, the base has trained nearly 350 orthopedic nurses specializing in orthopedic surgery.

Trainers

The training requirements are divided into a theoretical teaching group, a clinical practice teaching group, and an education and management group.
1.
Theory teaching group: Inclusion criteria: (1) bachelor’s degree or higher; (2) orthopedic specialist associate nurse practitioner or associate physician and above; (3) orthopedic clinical teaching experience of more than 5 years. Twenty-five theoretical instructors were screened from 5 Grade 3 A hospitals in Hunan Province. Five teachers with more than 10 years of orthopedic clinical experience and rich teaching and research experience were selected as research mentors in the theoretical teaching group to guide the research writing of the training participants.
 
2.
Clinical practice group: Inclusion criteria: (1) bachelor’s degree or above; (2) intermediate or above; (3) certified as a nurse specialist; (4) engaged in orthopedic specialist nursing for more than 5 years; and (5) passed the faculty training of the specialized committee. Teaching Form: One-to-one.
 
3.
Education and Management Group: The quality control and supervision of the supervisory training consisted of 10 members: four orthopedic nurse managers, one unit nurse manager, one director of nursing, and four orthopedic department heads. The instructor prepares the appropriate courseware before the training and conducts a lecture rehearsal for the members of the education and management team, identifies problems promptly, receives feedback, and modifies and improves the courseware, and the first time after the training, the trainees evaluate the courseware by anonymous evaluation and provide feedback on the suggestions for the courseware.
 

Training program

The training program was developed based on the objectives of enhancing theoretical knowledge, professional skills, comprehensive practical competencies, and professional development capabilities. Accordingly, the curriculum was structured to include relevant training courses.
Training goal setting According to the core competence requirements of orthopedic nurses, the overall objectives of this training are as follows [7]: (1) Theoretical Knowledge Skills: To acquire a comprehensive understanding of the theoretical knowledge related to orthopedic diseases and nursing care. (2) Professional Skills: To master the assessment methods for orthopedic surgical techniques, key observation points, and treatment approaches for potential complications. (3) Comprehensive Practical Skills: To develop proficiency in applying nursing program thinking, organizing and coordinating work plans, and employing supervision and guidance techniques. (4) Professional Development Skills: To learn fundamental research methodologies, enhance skills in writing specialized academic papers, and acquire knowledge of orthopedic specialty teaching methods.
Curriculum Offering The training syllabus for orthopedic specialist nurses was developed based on core competency indicators and findings from our previous study of 5020 nurses across 342 hospitals [15], The syllabus also incorporated the Hunan Provincial Health Commission’s training manual. Following two rounds of Delphi expert consultation, the program was refined according to expert feedback.
The training content included both theoretical lectures and clinical practice (1 + 2 mode). The total training duration was three months, including one month of theoretical study (160 h) and two months of clinical practice (320 h). In terms of curriculum implementation, training was carried out in four dimensions of nurses’ core competencies (Table 1).
Table 1
Orthopedic specialist nurse training program
Dimension
Training Time (in weeks)
Training Form
Evaluation Mode
Evaluation Subject
Theoretical knowledge
1 to 4
Teaching Theory
Special Lecture
Closed-book exam
Education and Management Group
Professional skills
5 to 11
Department Rotation
Full-time tutor-led Teaching
Operational Rehearsal
Clinical skills Operation exam
Comprehensive practical skills
5 to 11
Department Rotation
Full-time tutor-led Teaching
Group Lecture
Situational Construction
Clinical Comprehensive Ability Assessment
Professional development ability
1 to 4
5 to 11
12
Teaching Theory
Special Lecture
Group Lecture
Review Writing
Case reporting
(1) Theoretical knowledge skills: A combination of intensive teaching and individual self-study. The content mainly includes knowledge of orthopedics (spine surgery, trauma surgery, bone and joint surgery, etc.) related to basic diseases, common orthopedic nursing techniques, practical application of advanced orthopedic concepts, evaluation knowledge of orthopedic patients, common orthopedic drugs and nursing, quality and safety management of orthopedic patients, perioperative management of orthopedic patients, observation and treatment of orthopedic critically ill patients, and bone care department patient management mode. At the same time, Hunan orthopedic experts were invited to give special lectures to expand professional knowledge for training objectives.
(2) Professional skills: According to the intention of the trainees, orthopedic specialties will be assigned, one-on-one clinical teaching will be adopted, and one chief instructor will be responsible for the whole process for each specialty. The content of professional skills training is arranged by the chief instructor of the department and the individual instructor of the trainee, including the collection of orthopedic patients’ medical records, patient assessment, observation and nursing care of various types of orthopedic patients, orthopedic operation skills, interpretation and treatment of patients’ abnormal indications, use of commonly used drugs in orthopedic surgery and treatment of adverse reactions, etc., which is aimed at integrating and applying theories in clinical nursing and cultivating the trainee’s ability in clinical practice.
(3) Comprehensive practical skills: the training subjects are freely grouped into groups of six, with a group leader. A small lecture is arranged once a month, and two case discussions, all in small groups, are arranged as a unit for PPT reporting, reporting cases selected by the training subjects under the guidance of the instructor.
(4) Professional development ability: Throughout the whole training process, experts in the province are invited to give lectures during the 1st to 4th weeks of theoretical study, which mainly include orthopedic specialty nursing quality monitoring and management methods, occupational safety and protection, nursing management skills, literature searching and reading skills, scientific research questionnaire design methods, dissertation writing skills, and subject declaration methods. In the 5th to 11th weeks of the clinical practice process, skills are utilized during the 5th ~ 11th week. In the 12th week, students write a review article on orthopedic diseases under the guidance of the research tutor.

Training assessment

To assess the effectiveness of the training program, this study used the four dimensions of Kirkpatrick model. A final grade of more than than 80 is considered a passing score.
(1)
The Reaction level - measures the degree of motivation of the participants in the training program. Daily assessments, i.e., attendance (late arrival, early departure, absenteeism, and leave of absence) and usual performance (class participation, completion of assignments, and assumption of duties), are graded, with a total score of 100 points, which accounts for 5% of the final grade.
 
(2)
Learning level: Evaluation of the learning effect of the training target, including improvements in training knowledge and skills. A 60-minute closed-book assessment is conducted on the day of the end of the theoretical course, which mainly involves the key points and difficulties in theoretical training, with a total score of 100 points, accounting for 20% of the final grade. The assessment of professional skills was conducted on the day of the end of clinical practice, which was mainly about nursing check-ups and orthopedic specialty technology sampling, with a total score of 100 points, accounting for 20% of the final grade.
 
(3)
Behavioral level: This refers to behavioral change and involves observing whether the training subjects flexibly apply the learned knowledge and skills in practice. At the end of theoretical and clinical practice training, a unified comprehensive clinical competence assessment is conducted for each training object, which mainly covers the formulation of nursing problems of orthopedic diseases, the implementation of nursing measures, the mastery of orthopedic professional technical operation skills, the interpretation of orthopedic examination and test results, health promotion, etc. The average scores of the two times are taken if the practice is conducted in two departments. The total score is 100 points, accounting for 40% of the final grade.
 
(4)
Results level: This indicator measures the impact of the training on the training participant’s development and the benefits to the organization. In the last week of clinical practice, the training participants gave a 10-minute orthopedic case report in PPT form, and the education and management team teachers asked questions and commented for 5 min. On the basis of the “Hunan Province Orthopedic Nurse Specialist Training Case Assessment Form”, the assessment teacher scored the training participants in terms of basic knowledge of orthopedic diseases, proposal and rationale for nursing measures, citation of references, practicality of the content of the review, content of the PPT report, and verbal expression ability. Moreover, the scientific review was scored on the Hunan Province Orthopedic Nurse Specialist Training Review Assessment Form. The total score of both the synthesis and case reports was 100 points, each accounting for 5% of the final grade [10].
 

Core competency assessment

The core competence evaluation scale for orthopedic nurses was designed and used to evaluate the core competencies of orthopedic specialty nurses by Luo et al. [7]. This questionnaire is divided into 4 dimensions, namely, theoretical knowledge (24 entries), professional skills (19 entries), comprehensive practice ability (14 entries), and professional development ability (15 entries). All of which are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0–4 points in order from “complete ignorance” to “complete mastery”, with total scores ranging from 0-288 points, with 0–96 points for theoretical knowledge, 0–76 points for professional skills, 0–56 points for theoretical knowledge, 0–96 points for professional skills, 0–76 points for comprehensive practice ability, 0–56 points for professional development ability, and 0–60 points for professional development ability. A higher total score indicates greater core competency among orthopedic nurse specialists. The internal consistency Cronbach’s α coefficient in this study was 0.98.

Data analysis

IBM SPSS 26.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. If the measurement data conformed to a normal distribution, they were expressed as the mean and standard deviation, and the counting data were expressed as the frequency (n) and percentage (%). A paired test was used to compare the score differences before and after the intervention, and the difference was statistically significant, with P < 0.05 for both sides.

Results

The results section presents the relevant outcomes of the specialist nurse training assessment and provides a comparative analysis of the core competencies of specialist nurses before and after the training.

Participants

The recruitment of study participants was conducted through the dissemination of the orthopedic specialist nurse training announcement on the official website of the Hunan Provincial Nursing Association and its WeChat official account. A total of 102 questionnaires were distributed in this study, and 102 valid questionnaires were recovered, for a recovery rate of 100%. The training subjects were all female (100%), with a mean age of 32.03 ± 3.55 years, of which 26 cases (25.5%) were between the ages of 20–29 years, 75 cases (73.5%) were between the ages of 30–39 years, and one case (1%) was 40 years old and above. A total of 99.2% of the training subjects had bachelor’s degrees, while those with a college degree or below and a master’s degree or above accounted for 7.8% and 1%, respectively. And 64.7% of the training subjects had more than five years of experience in orthopedics; 41 (39.2%) were nurses and nurse practitioners, 61 (59.8%) were supervisory nurse practitioners, and one (1%) was an associate nurse practitioner and above; 57.8% of the training subjects were from tertiary hospitals.

Evaluation assessment

Table 2 shows the results of the evaluation assessment. After three months of training as orthopedic nurse specialists, the mean final score of the training participants was 89.01 ± 2.16. The Reaction level of the outcome had the highest score, with the training participants scoring full marks for both theory and practical daily attendance. The Behavioral level score was next highest (95.67 ± 1.89), followed by the Result level total score (89.13 ± 2.57) and the Learning level total score (84.75 ± 3.81).
Table 2
Evaluates the training effect via Kirkpatrick training evaluation model
Dimension
\(\:\stackrel{-}{x}\pm\:s\)
Project(Percentage of completion grades)
\(\:\stackrel{-}{x}\)
\(\:s\)
minimum
maximum
Reaction
100
Theoretical daily attendance(5%)
5
0
5
5
  
Practice Daily Attendance(5%)
5
0
5
5
Learning
84.75 ± 3.81
Theoretical examination results(20%)
15.12
1.32
12
18
  
Achievement of professional skills(20%)
18.76
0.60
17
19.6
Behavior
95.67 ± 1.89
Comprehensive Clinical Competence(40%)
38.27
0.75
36.2
39.4
Result
89.13 ± 2.57
Review(5%)
4.61
0.29
4.065
6.37
  
Case report(5%)
4.38
0.13
4.05
4.78
Final grades
89.01 ± 2.16
Total(100%)
89.01
2.16
82.83
93.90

Comparison of the core competence of orthopedic nurses before and after training

Compared with those in the pretraining period, the total core competency scores and four-dimensional scores of 102 orthopedic nurses were significantly higher after training (Table 3).
Table 3
Comparison of core competence scores before and after training (\(\:\stackrel{-}{x}\pm\:s\))
 
Total Points
theoretical knowledge
professional skill
Comprehensive practical ability
Professional development capability
Pretraining
154.13\(\:\pm\:\)35.97
49.47\(\:\pm\:\)13.12
42.62\(\:\pm\:\)10.99
33.56\(\:\pm\:\)7.90
28.48\(\:\pm\:\)8.44
After training
230.27\(\:\pm\:\)38.76
75.65\(\:\pm\:\)13.48
63.09\(\:\pm\:\)10.83
46.23\(\:\pm\:\)7.41
45.31\(\:\pm\:\)9.26
\(\:t\)
15.88
15.10
14.14
12.34
15.22
P
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
All pretraining scores on the theoretical knowledge dimension were < 3, and in particular, the scores on imaging manifestations of common orthopedic diseases, spinal deformities, bone and soft tissue tumors, and congenital diseases related to congenital diseases were < 1.7. After training, more than 80% (24/29) of the entries for the theory dimension were greater than 3 points. However, nurses still scored less than 3 points for common orthopedic imaging manifestations, bone and soft tissue tumors, bone and joint infections, tuberculosis, bone and cartilage developmental and metabolic disorders, and congenital disorders (Table 4).
Table 4
Comparison of theoretical knowledge dimensions before and after training (\(\:\stackrel{-}{x}\pm\:s\))
Secondary indicator
Item
Pretraining
After training
t
P
Orthopedic Basics
Clinical orthopedic anatomy
2.01 ± 0.72
3.09 ± 0.63
-11.21
< 0.001
Orthopedic-related physical examination
1.91 ± 0.68
3.27 ± 0.66
-14.30
< 0.001
Imaging manifestations of common orthopedic diseases
1.64 ± 0.78
2.88 ± 0.76
-11.05
< 0.001
Common orthopedic treatment techniques
2.45 ± 0.77
3.31 ± 0.63
-9.44
< 0.001
Orthopedics-related laboratory indicators
2.00 ± 0.76
3.19 ± 0.66
-12.32
< 0.001
Basic knowledge and nursing of common orthopedic diseases
Quadriplegic injury
2.25 ± 0.69
3.26 ± 0.61
-12.17
< 0.001
Pelvic injury
2.24 ± 0.77
3.16 ± 0.71
-10.12
< 0.001
Hand trauma
2.08 ± 0.71
3.02 ± 0.73
-10.09
< 0.001
Spinal cord injury
1.91 ± 0.90
3.11 ± 0.86
-10.04
< 0.001
Degenerative diseases of the spine
1.95 ± 0.94
3.19 ± 0.82
-10.29
< 0.001
Spinal deformity
1.70 ± 0.94
3.00 ± 0.88
-10.05
< 0.001
Nonsuppurative arthritis
1.89 ± 0.81
3.04 ± 0.70
-11.96
< 0.001
Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors
1.69 ± 0.84
2.87 ± 0.77
-10.75
< 0.001
Bone and joint infections and tuberculosis
1.79 ± 0.79
2.97 ± 0.76
-12.14
< 0.001
Bone and Cartilage Development and Metabolic Diseases
1.75 ± 0.75
2.97 ± 0.74
-12.45
< 0.001
Congenital disease
1.57 ± 0.76
2.93 ± 0.75
-13.21
< 0.001
Management of common orthopedic complications
Fat embolism syndrome
1.83 ± 0.80
3.08 ± 0.77
-12.11
< 0.001
Posttraumatic respiratory distress syndrome
1.9 ± 0.74
3.08 ± 0.77
-12.01
< 0.001
Traumatic shock
2.47 ± 0.74
3.30 ± 0.66
-8.81
< 0.001
Lung infections and respiratory failure
2.23 ± 0.81
3.22 ± 0.71
-9.21
< 0.001
Thromboembolism
2.63 ± 0.76
3.53 ± 0.59
-10.17
< 0.001
Pressure sores and wound infections
2.63 ± 0.64
3.46 ± 0.56
-10.40
< 0.001
Urinary tract infection
2.68 ± 0.72
3.43 ± 0.55
-8.74
< 0.001
Perioperative management
Management of elderly patients
2.28 ± 0.76
3.28 ± 0.65
-11.96
< 0.001
Nutritional management and gastrointestinal management
2.00 ± 0.75
3.20 ± 0.69
-11.68
< 0.001
Pain Management
2.27 ± 0.80
3.40 ± 0.64
-11.54
< 0.001
Psychiatric Nursing
2.27 ± 0.76
3.28 ± 0.67
-9.91
< 0.001
Health education, rehabilitation guidance
2.27 ± 0.66
3.32 ± 0.68
-10.94
< 0.001
Management of comorbid underlying diseases
2.20 ± 0.73
3.19 ± 0.71
-10.42
< 0.001
The professional skills dimension included orthopedic nursing assessment techniques and orthopedic specialty nursing operation techniques. Before the training, the average entry scores of the training subjects were the lowest in terms of neurological function assessment and joint mobility assessment, and after the training, the average scores of all the entries of the professional skill dimension improved (> 3 points), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001), as shown in Table 5.
Table 5
Comparison of the dimensions of professional skills before and after training
Secondary indicator
Item
Pretraining
After training
t
P
Orthopedic nursing evaluation techniques
Assessment of peripheral blood circulation, sensation, and activity
2.21 ± 0.67
3.30 ± 0.72
11.43
< 0.001
Neurological function assessment
1.74 ± 0.84
3.16 ± 0.85
-12.33
< 0.001
Assessment of the degree of swelling of the affected limb
2.26 ± 0.74
3.30 ± 0.72
-10.66
< 0.001
Joint range of motion assessment
1.90 ± 0.78
3.19 ± 0.70
-13.25
< 0.001
Evaluation of cast, traction, splint
2.24 ± 0.75
3.25 ± 0.71
-10.56
< 0.001
Assessment of fall risk
2.51 ± 0.74
3.44 ± 0.61
-10.16
< 0.001
Orthopedic specialty nursing operation technology
Postural care
2.35 ± 0.78
3.43 ± 0.62
-11.71
< 0.001
Porterage
2.36 ± 0.83
3.39 ± 0.66
-9.83
< 0.001
Turn over operation
2.58 ± 0.78
3.47 ± 0.63
-8.80
< 0.001
Functional training
2.26 ± 0.73
3.44 ± 0.59
-12.82
< 0.001
Traction nursing
2.40 ± 0.79
3.37 ± 0.67
-10.01
< 0.001
External Fixation Brace Care
2.28 ± 0.76
3.28 ± 0.72
-9.77
< 0.001
Negative pressure closed drainage care
2.49 ± 0.79
3.35 ± 0.67
-8.58
< 0.001
Use of orthopedic rehabilitation equipment
2.01 ± 0.85
3.27 ± 0.71
-13.11
< 0.001
Table 6 shows the dimension of comprehensive skills and practical abilities. The training participants’ performance in the dimension of “effective combination of theory and skills” was the worst, and the scores of “sense of responsibility, prudence, and three-checking and seven-checking” before and after the training were all > 3 points. After the training, the average scores of all the items were greater than those before the training, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001).
Table 6
Comparison of comprehensive practical ability before and after training
Secondary indicator
Item
Pretraining
After training
t
P
Comprehensive nursing ability
Utilization of the nursing process
1.78 ± 0.71
3.20 ± 0.73
-13.872
< 0.001
Organic combination of theory and skills
1.93 ± 0.81
3.23 ± 0.66
-13.059
< 0.001
Patient-centered philosophy
2.55 ± 0.80
3.39 ± 0.62
-8.495
< 0.001
Responsibility, discretion, three checks, and seven checks.
3.04 ± 0.83
3.62 ± 0.56
-5.679
< 0.001
Evidence-based nursing practice
2.19 ± 0.84
3.20 ± 0.76
-9.168
< 0.001
communication and coordination ability
Effective nurse‒patient communication
2.70 ± 0.76
3.44 ± 0.59
-7.744
< 0.001
Coordination capacity
2.82 ± 0.83
3.44 ± 0.57
-6.145
< 0.001
Critical thinking ability
Predictive thinking
2.37 ± 0.73
3.25 ± 0.67
-9.167
< 0.001
Emergency response capacity
2.48 ± 0.67
3.25 ± 0.64
-8.691
< 0.001
Analytical and judgmental skills
2.50 ± 0.70
3.31 ± 0.60
-9.384
< 0.001
Decision-making capacity
2.32 ± 0.66
3.25 ± 0.61
-11.101
< 0.001
Management ability
Planning capacity
2.32 ± 0.63
3.27 ± 0.62
-11.164
< 0.001
Organizational capacity
2.31 ± 0.69
3.24 ± 0.60
-10.634
< 0.001
Supervision and guidance
2.24 ± 0.71
3.14 ± 0.66
-10.299
< 0.001
In the dimension of professional development ability shown in Table 7, the pretraining results revealed that orthopedic nurses performed the worst in “professional papers (0.77 ± 0.77)”, “research projects (0.93 ± 0.86)”, “academic communication (1.21 ± 0.78)”, “keeping abreast of the academic frontiers (1.54 ± 0.93)” and “mastery of academic frontiers (1.54 ± 0.93)”. After the training, the various professional development abilities of the training participants improved, and the difference between before and after the training was statistically significant (P < 0.001).
Table 7
Comparison of professional development ability before and after training
Secondary indicator
Item
Pretraining
After training
t
P
Learning ability
Grasp the academic frontier
1.54 ± 0.93
2.96 ± 0.81
-11.83
< 0.001
Learn new ideas and knowledge
2.27 ± 0.86
3.17 ± 0.68
-8.72
< 0.001
Academic Communication
1.21 ± 0.78
2.58 ± 1.02
-10.45
< 0.001
Teaching ability
Classroom Teaching
2.17 ± 0.83
3.14 ± 0.69
-9.81
< 0.001
Skills Training
2.38 ± 0.75
3.24 ± 0.68
-9.63
< 0.001
Clinical science teaching
2.35 ± 0.75
3.23 ± 0.67
-9.37
< 0.001
Teaching rounds
1.99 ± 0.83
3.13 ± 0.71
-11.78
< 0.001
Research ability
Professional paper
0.77 ± 0.77
2.55 ± 0.88
-16.19
< 0.001
Scientific research project
0.93 ± 0.86
2.45 ± 0.99
-12.70
< 0.001
New technology new business
1.76 ± 0.77
2.9 ± 0.83
-11.10
< 0.001
Career planning ability
Self-ability cognition
2.31 ± 0.82
3.25 ± 0.70
-9.35
< 0.001
Professional orientation
2.31 ± 0.74
3.24 ± 0.66
-9.68
< 0.001
Career goal setting
2.22 ± 0.74
3.15 ± 0.70
-9.25
< 0.001
Career pathway design
2.1 ± 0.78
3.15 ± 0.70
-11.18
< 0.001
Practical Action
2.16 ± 0.88
3.21 ± 0.71
-10.61
< 0.001

Discussion

Orthopedic specialty diseases are complex and highly specialized, and new technologies and new businesses are widely used in orthopedic clinics, which presents new challenges to orthopedic specialty nursing. To provide patients with safe and high-quality medical services, training orthopedic specialist nurses has become an inevitable requirement for the development of nursing specialization. In this study, 102 orthopedic nurses in Hunan Province were trained via the orthopedic nurse specialist core competency system framework as the basis for curriculum development and Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation model as the guiding model for effect evaluation, and the results revealed that the training program had good feasibility and effectiveness, which can be used as a reference for the unified training of orthopedic nurse specialists in the future.

Orthopedic nurse specialist training programs have special characteristics and are conducive to improving trainees’ core competencies

The training curriculum and practice program are formulated within the framework of the core competence of orthopedic nurses, which is validated by Hunan orthopedic, rehabilitation, therapeutic, and nursing experts, with a focus on the knowledge and technology of high morbidity and critical illnesses in the field of orthopedics and a focus on cultivating the core competence of trainees. The format of this training is diversified according to the different training courses, covering a variety of forms, such as theoretical lectures, lectures by experts, departmental rotations, operation exercises, and group discussions. The instructors are all orthopedic specialists in the clinical setting of Hunan tertiary hospitals, with solid theoretical knowledge and rich practical experience. Clinical practice adopts the tutor system, formulates a strict practical training plan, and correctly intervenes and guides trainees to carry out operation scenario drills. Trainees learn, share, and communicate under the one-on-one guidance of the mentor They internalize the knowledge with secondary understanding, reconstruct the knowledge framework, and expand the knowledge circle. In recent years, China has carried out specialized orthopedic nurse training in Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, and other places. For example, Liu et al. [8] explored the application of the nursing outcome-oriented case management model in orthopedic nurse specialist training; Tong [9] explored the impact of orthopedic nurse specialist training on the development of orthopedic surgery in Jiangsu Province. However, previous training content has neglected the development of competencies for instance research [8, 9]. Research thinking and innovative consciousness are the conditions for conforming to the development trend of the times and are necessary components in the career planning of specialized nurses [6]. This training not only develops the professional knowledge and skills of orthopedic nurse specialists but also incorporates scientific research ability and management thinking into the scope of training, aiming to improve the core competence of orthopedic nurse specialists in all aspects and to enable orthopedic nurses to play an advantageous role in clinical work, scientific research and innovation, and teaching and management. The results of this study indicate that following the implementation of the training program for orthopedic specialist nurses, there were statistically significant improvements in theoretical knowledge, professional skills, comprehensive practical abilities, and professional development capabilities (P < 0.001). These findings suggest that the training program not only augmented the professional knowledge base of the nurses but also underscored the importance of integrating theoretical knowledge with clinical practice. Furthermore, the program enhanced participants’ abilities in critical areas, including clinical observation and analytical thinking, emergency problem-solving, and research and learning skills.

Evaluating the training effect of specialized orthopedic nurses on the basis of Kirkpatrick training evaluation model and nurses’ core competencies is feasible

The evaluation system is an important basis for measuring the quality of training, which can directly reflect the degree of fulfillment of the training objectives [16]. The evaluation content of specialized nurse training in China is mostly formulated by hospitals or various specialties according to their own needs, lacking a continuous evaluation mechanism, and the comprehensiveness and effectiveness of the evaluation are insufficient [17]. This study adopted the widely-used Kirkpatrick model to establish a standardized evaluation for orthopedic nurse specialist training. It comprehensively assesses training effects, meets diverse needs, and is practical and feasible [12, 18]. In addition, among the top 10 most frequently published research articles on nurse specialist training, “core competencies” is an important indicator for measuring the level of specialization of nurse specialists [19]. This study also combined the core competencies for the comprehensive evaluation of training effectiveness [19]. The evaluation and feedback mechanism effectively promotes the continuous improvement of the training quality of orthopedic specialist nurses, promotes the healthy and orderly development of orthopedic therapeutic specialties, and lays a solid foundation for the establishment of a specialized training system for orthopedic specialist nurses.
After the training of specialized nurses, the overall competence of the trainees has improved, but there are still some entries with scores lower than 3 after the training, such as the “imaging manifestations of common orthopedic diseases” in the orthopedic basics in the dimension of theoretical knowledge, indicating that the trainees’ ability to learn and update theoretical knowledge needs to be improved. Previous studies have shown that most specialist nurses have assumed the role of only clinical workers, whereas their ability to act as educators, researchers, administrators, and consultants has been weakened and neglected [20], which is consistent with the results of this study. In this study, trainees’ professional development abilities, such as “mastering the academic frontier”, “academic communication”, “professional papers” and “scientific research projects”, were low before and after training. This is related to the fact that the majority of the trainees who participated in this training had college or undergraduate degrees. Most of them had a weak scientific research foundation. This highlights the importance of writing specialized textbooks for orthopedic nursing and offering elective courses in nursing schools. It also shows that the development of the research capacity of orthopedic nurse specialists is a long way to go and requires a longer period before significant results can be seen. Therefore, improving theoretical and professional development skills is the focus of future training. In the future, a presurvey on the current level of nursing research and training needs of trainees will be carried out to clarify the needs and improve the relevance of the contents of the lectures and the effectiveness of the training.

Vision for the future of orthopedic nurse specialist training

Focus on layered training and tracking the effects of forward training. The minimum educational requirement for most orthopedic practice nurses in the United States is a master’s degree in nursing [19]; in comparison, our country has lower educational access requirements for specialized nurses, which is one of the reasons for their lower theoretical foundation and research capacity. In the future, a precise tiered training system can be developed and taught according to nurses’ academic qualifications, giving full play to the maximum development potential of nurses at each tier. Highly educated nurses have high academic and practical skills to adapt to complex healthcare environments, participate in or develop policies, and make recommendations for the healthcare system. Nurses at lower academic levels but with more clinical experience enhance their operational thinking for clinical quality improvement and are encouraged to file patent inventions and promote their use.
In addition, there should be a focus on longitudinal follow-up of trained orthopedic nurse specialists. Fan et al. [20] investigated the current status of the job management of orthopedic specialist nurses in 28 provinces, cities, and autonomous regions across the country and reported that 74.64% of nurses whose jobs did not change after training and that most orthopedic specialist nurses were less likely to carry out advanced nursing practice work and were still dominated by routine nursing practice. If the training is followed by no active practical application, the purpose of the training is lost. Some provinces in China are encouraging clinical nurse specialists to provide long-term care for chronically ill patients after discharge from hospitals in a variety of ways, for example, by setting up specialist care clinics in primary healthcare organizations. However, the issue of how to transfer quality resources to primary care organizations, communities, and nursing homes still deserves extensive research [21].

Limitations

Although the training faculty included in this study were experienced clinical cadres in orthopedics, there may have been bias in their selection due to the current lack of a uniform faculty certification system. In addition, the establishment of research awareness and improvement in competence is a gradual process, so it is difficult to see significant progress in 3 months of training, and the development of trainees’ competence will be further tracked in the future.

Conclusion

This orthopedic nurse specialist training has improved the core competence, scientific research ability, management and guidance ability, and teaching ability of trainees and cultivated a group of backbone talents for China’s orthopedic specialist nursing career. In the future, we will summarize the training experience and lessons learned, establish a tiered training model and evaluation system according to the level of nurses, further improve the orthopedic nurse specialist training program, establish a standardized, unified, and systematic orthopedic nurse specialist qualification and teacher certification mechanism, maximize the ability of specialist nurses, and promote the development of a nursing career.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledgement the respondents who participanted in this training and the support of Nursing Group of the Orthopedic Specialty Committee of the Hunan Provincial Medical Association.

Declarations

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. All participants have given informed consent. And the methods in this study were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Motta F, Barone E, Sica A, et al. Inflammaging and Osteoarthritis[J]. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2023;64(2):222–38.CrossRefPubMed Motta F, Barone E, Sica A, et al. Inflammaging and Osteoarthritis[J]. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2023;64(2):222–38.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Maradit KH, Larson DR, Crowson CS, et al. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the united States[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(17):1386–97.CrossRef Maradit KH, Larson DR, Crowson CS, et al. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the united States[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(17):1386–97.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chunlan B, Lihui P, Hong X, et al. The gerontological nurse specialist’s core competencies in China: A cross-sectional study[J]. Nurs Open. 2020;7(6):1928–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chunlan B, Lihui P, Hong X, et al. The gerontological nurse specialist’s core competencies in China: A cross-sectional study[J]. Nurs Open. 2020;7(6):1928–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tong Y, Zhu H, Wang J, et al. The effect of training orthopedic nurse specialists in Jiangsu Province of China[J]. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(9):9488–96.CrossRefPubMed Tong Y, Zhu H, Wang J, et al. The effect of training orthopedic nurse specialists in Jiangsu Province of China[J]. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(9):9488–96.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirkpatrick DK. Techniques for evaluating training Programs[J]. Training and development journal; 1979. Kirkpatrick DK. Techniques for evaluating training Programs[J]. Training and development journal; 1979.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamkin P. Kirkpatrick and Beyond: a Review of Models of Training Evaluation (IES Report)[J]. Grantham Book Services, Ltd., Isaac Newton Way, Alma Park Industrial Estate, Grantham NG31 9SD, United Kingdom (18.95 British pounds (bound copy); 8 British pounds (pdf)). Web site: http://www.employment-studies.co.uk., 2002. Tamkin P. Kirkpatrick and Beyond: a Review of Models of Training Evaluation (IES Report)[J]. Grantham Book Services, Ltd., Isaac Newton Way, Alma Park Industrial Estate, Grantham NG31 9SD, United Kingdom (18.95 British pounds (bound copy); 8 British pounds (pdf)). Web site: http://​www.​employment-studies.​co.​uk., 2002.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston S, Coyer FM, Nash R. Kirkpatrick’s evaluation of simulation and debriefing in health care education: A systematic Review[J]. J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(7):393–8.CrossRefPubMed Johnston S, Coyer FM, Nash R. Kirkpatrick’s evaluation of simulation and debriefing in health care education: A systematic Review[J]. J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(7):393–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang Y, Shang L. Construction of evaluation index system for training effect of hospital infection control specialist nurses[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2022,36(20):3604–3608. doi:10. 12102/j. issn. 1009–6493. 2022. 20. 006. Huang Y, Shang L. Construction of evaluation index system for training effect of hospital infection control specialist nurses[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2022,36(20):3604–3608. doi:10. 12102/j. issn. 1009–6493. 2022. 20. 006.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dehon E, Robertson E, Barnard M, et al. Erratum: this Article corrects: development of a clinical teaching evaluation and feedback tool for emergency medicine Faculty[J]. West J Emerg Med. 2019;20(5):838–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dehon E, Robertson E, Barnard M, et al. Erratum: this Article corrects: development of a clinical teaching evaluation and feedback tool for emergency medicine Faculty[J]. West J Emerg Med. 2019;20(5):838–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Momennasab M, Mohammadi F, DehghanRad F, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a training programme for nurses regarding augmentative and alternative communication with intubated patients using Kirkpatrick’s model: A pilot study[J]. Nurs Open. 2023;10(5):2895–903.CrossRefPubMed Momennasab M, Mohammadi F, DehghanRad F, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a training programme for nurses regarding augmentative and alternative communication with intubated patients using Kirkpatrick’s model: A pilot study[J]. Nurs Open. 2023;10(5):2895–903.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan X, Liu J, Xie H. A survey of the position management status for orthopedic specialist nurses[J]. Chin J Nurs. 2020;55(8):1223–8. Fan X, Liu J, Xie H. A survey of the position management status for orthopedic specialist nurses[J]. Chin J Nurs. 2020;55(8):1223–8.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Tong Y, Jiang Y, et al. The effectiveness of extended care based on internet and home care platform for orthopaedics after hip replacement surgery in China[J]. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(21–22):4077–88.CrossRefPubMed Wang J, Tong Y, Jiang Y, et al. The effectiveness of extended care based on internet and home care platform for orthopaedics after hip replacement surgery in China[J]. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(21–22):4077–88.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Practice of core competence training for orthopedic nurses in Hunan Province of China
verfasst von
Yang Zhou
Yabin Guo
Liya Huang
Biyun Zeng
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2025
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2025
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02895-3