Intervention
The study involved 84 nursing students who completed initial questionnaires on Orem’s Self-Care Model needs assessment, demographic information, academic self-efficacy, and sleep quality. The intervention group participated in four training sessions over two weeks, each lasting 30 to 45 min and held twice a week.
The topics covered in the sessions were as follows: Session 1 focused on basic needs such as air, water, and nutrition; Session 2 addressed excretory processes and practical strategies for preventing life risks to maintain well-being; Session 3 emphasized the importance of balancing activity and rest, stress management, and creating an optimal sleeping environment; and Session 4 included techniques for balancing social interaction and isolation, along with developmental needs aimed at promoting life processes and preventing harmful conditions. The researcher provided the training in person, thus it is directly applicable to your work (Table
1).
Table 1
Time table and content of training based on Orem’s self-care model
Universal self-care needs | Air | 5 min |
Water | 5 min |
Food | 10 min |
Care related to excretory processes | 5 min |
Prevention of risks related to human life, performance, and well-being | 10 min |
Improving growth performance in accordance with genetic and structural characteristics and individual talent within the framework of social and cultural norms | 15 min |
Establishing a balance between activity and rest | 45 min |
Establishing a balance between seclusion and social interaction | 15 min |
Developmental self-care needs | Establishing and maintaining conditions that support life processes and promote evolutionary processes that lead to the promotion and development of humans to higher levels of human structure and maturity | 35 min |
Health self-care needs | Anticipating and providing care to prevent the occurrence of complications and destructive and harmful conditions that are effective for human development or to overcome and eliminate these complications according to different circumstances | 20 min |
At the conclusion of the intervention, both the intervention and control groups were given the academic self-efficacy and sleep quality questionnaires again. To reduce the risk of contamination, sessions were scheduled at separate times and locations, and unintentional contacts were monitored to assure the study’s integrity.
Instruments
In this study, we used a needs assessment form created to evaluate nursing students’ self-care needs, focusing on universal, developmental, and health-related components as stated by Orem’s self-care model. The form asked questions about vital signs, hydration consumption, diet, oral and dental care, sleep quality, exercise level, elimination status, self-awareness, self-confidence, body image, social interaction, employment, and housing conditions. The form was designed using scientific literature and Orem’s self-care model ideas in mind [
34]. To assure its content validity, ten academic members from Zanjan University of Medical Sciences reviewed the form and confirmed its relevancy and comprehensiveness. The form’s dependability was thoroughly assessed using the test-retest method, with 30 nursing students completing the form twice over a two-week period, yielding a high correlation coefficient of 0.86, indicating good consistency.
The form’s total score ranged from 0 to 20, with higher scores reflecting better self-care behaviors and fewer self-care needs. Each area was assigned a specific maximum score: Air (3), Water (2), Food (3), Excretory Processes (3), Activity Level and Exercise (2), Sleep Quality (3), Communication and Social Engagement (2), and Mental Health and Emotional Well-being (2). The total score was divided into five categories to indicate self-care needs: a score of 0–4 signifies a very high need requiring immediate intervention, 5–8 reflects a high need that requires comprehensive strategies, 9–12 indicates a moderate need that calls for targeted interventions, 13–16 suggests a low need where minor improvements could be beneficial, and a score of 17–20 denotes a very low need, indicating excellent self-care with minimal intervention required.
The academic self-efficacy questionnaire used in this study was developed by Zajacova and colleagues [
35]. The questionnaire consists of 27 items and measures a student’s confidence in various academic tasks, such as notetaking, asking questions, paying attention in class, computer usage, etc. It is scored using a five-point Likert scale (ranging from “very little” to “very much”), with each item having a value between 0 and 10. The minimum possible score is 0, and the maximum is 270. This scale does not have a cut-off point; a higher score means more self-efficacy. The questionnaire has four subscales: confidence in academic performance in class (items 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 18, and 22); confidence in academic performance outside of class (items 1, 3, 4, 5, 15, 17, 25, and 27); confidence in one’s ability to interact with others at the university (items 2, 7, 20, 21, 23, and 26); and confidence in one’s ability to interact with others outside the university (items 12, 14, 19, and 24). In 2011, Shokri and his colleagues established the questionnaire standard in Iran. They used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm the four factors. The authors reported reliability coefficients using Cronbach’s alpha: confidence in academic performance in class (α = 0.88); confidence in academic performance outside of class (α = 0.85); confidence in the ability to interact with others at university (α = 0.83); and confidence in the ability to balance work, family, and university (α = 0.72) [
36]. In this study, the tool’s reliability was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha method and was found to be (α = 0.73).
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Questionnaire was developed by Buysse et al. to measure sleep quality and patterns in adults. This questionnaire assesses both good and poor sleep quality. The original questionnaire consists of 9 items, but since question 5 contains 10 subitems, the whole questionnaire has 19 items. Participants are asked to rate each item on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3. The questionnaire included: items that assess the subjective quality of sleep, delay in falling asleep, length of useful sleep duration, sleep sufficiency (the ratio of useful sleep duration to the time spent in bed); sleep disorders (waking up at night), amount of sleep medication consumed, and daily functioning disorders (problems caused by insomnia during the day). A score more than 5 indicates poor sleep quality and severe problems in at least two areas or moderate problems in more than one area. The higher the score is, the poorer the sleep quality. The worst possible score is 23, while the best score is 0. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was obtained through Cronbach’s alpha and was found to be (α = 0.81) [
23,
37]. Chehri et al. also standardized the questionnaire in Iran. The authors used confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha to report the following reliability coefficients: mental sleep quality (α = 0.77), sleep delay (α = 0.71), sleep duration (α = 0.69), sleep efficiency (α = 0.79), sleep disturbance (α = 0.79), use of sleeping pills (α = 0.77), and daily functioning (α = 0.07) [
38]. In this study, the tool’s reliability was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha method and was found to be (α = 0.81).