Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Research

Enhancing nutritional care in palliative care units: assessing nurse knowledge and quality perception in enteral nutrition practices

verfasst von: Zehra Batu, Gül Bülbül Maraş, Kadriye Turan

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Background

Adequate, balanced, and individualized nutrition, planned according to the patients’ life expectancy in palliative care units, is crucial for maintaining essential functions.

Aim

To determine the knowledge levels of nurses working in palliative care units regarding enteral nutrition practices and their perceptions of nutritional care quality in their units.

Methods

This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in 25 palliative care units located in Izmir, Türkiye, between June and September 2022. The study sample consisted of 205 nurses working in palliative care units. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, an Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form, and the Nurses’ Perceived Nutrition Care Quality Assessment Scale. The STROBE checklist was also utilized.

Results

The study found that the majority of participating nurses (94.6%) were female, with 78.5% holding bachelor’s degrees. The median knowledge score for enteral nutrition: 15 (range: 2–27), perceived care quality score: 36 (range: 9–45). Those with enteral nutrition training had significantly higher knowledge scores (p < .001); palliative care certificate showed no difference (p = .846). Nurses lacking nutrition counseling knowledge had lower perceived care quality scores (p = .001). Monthly tube feeding applications correlated positively with knowledge scores (r = .173, p = .013), unlike professional experience duration (p = .126) and time spent in palliative care (p = .839).

Conclusion

Nurses working in the palliative care unit find the quality of nutrition care provided to patients in their clinics to be sufficient, and the level of knowledge regarding enteral nutrition is at a moderate level. However, in questions related to nursing care such as fluid requirements during enteral nutrition with enteral solutions that affect both nutritional care and medical treatment, maintaining the opening of the jejunostomy tube, and enteral drug administration, correct response rates were low. Low correct response rates on specific issues highlight a need for targeted educational interventions.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12912-024-02580-x.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

The rapid advancements in medicine and technology, along with the increasing human lifespan, have ushered in an era where individuals are living longer with chronic and life-threatening illnesses [13]. As a result, healthcare professionals are encountering palliative care patients with chronic and life-threatening illnesses more frequently [2, 3]. Palliative care, encompassing holistic support for individuals of all ages enduring severe health-related suffering, especially those nearing the end of life, is crucial [4] According to the World Health Organization (WHO), “Palliative care is an approach that aims to improve the quality of life for patients and their families facing problems associated with life-threatening illnesses. It involves the early identification and impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other physical, psychosocial, and spiritual issues to prevent and alleviate suffering [2]. Its goal is to ensure terminal patients can live their remaining days in comfort [4, 5].
Adequate and balanced nutrition is crucial for maintaining essential functions in palliative care patients. However, symptoms like discomfort, nausea, oral ulcers, diarrhea, and vomiting can severely impact their nutritional intake, leading to deficiencies [3]. Malnutrition in these patients can result in loss of body mass, weakened immunity, and organ dysfunction, ultimately affecting disease progression, reducing quality of life, and increasing hospitalization duration and mortality risk [6, 7]. Palliative care patients should be assessed for the risk of malnutrition, and early nutritional support should be initiated when necessary [5]. However, not all palliative care patients will benefit from enteral nutrition; this depends on their nutritional status. Therefore, it is important to use tools to support decisions about enteral nutrition. To evaluate the need for enteral nutrition in palliative care patients, tools like the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score are recommended, along with close monitoring of the patient’s functional status. Nutritional plans should be tailored to meet the patient’s energy needs while prioritizing individual preferences and enhancing quality of life [8].
Nurses are integral members of the multidisciplinary palliative care team, playing key roles in enhancing patients’ quality of life and ensuring adequate nutrition [911]. Their responsibilities, though varying based on hospital policies, typically involve tasks such as inserting and maintaining nasogastric feeding tubes, assessing calorie needs, initiating and adjusting nutrition plans, and promptly identifying and addressing any changes in patients’ conditions [9, 12, 13]. Nurses’ lack of knowledge about enteral nutrition [1416], noncompliance with feeding guidelines [14], and practice inconsistencies all contribute to malnutrition in critically ill patients, including those in palliative care units [9, 11, 17].
In many cases, such as short-term intensive care, chronic neurological diseases, gastrointestinal system diseases, and vegetative diseases, artificial feeding has benefits and is indicated. However, for some cases, the current literature provides evidence that the risks, possible complications, and burdens outweigh the benefits and are not beneficial. In such cases, it is recommended not to start or to stop artificial feeding [18]. Nutritional support should be planned individually according to life expectancy. Patients with a life expectancy of days to weeks are unlikely to benefit from enteral and parenteral artificial nutrition. In patients with a life expectancy of less than a few weeks, it is recommended not to initiate artificial nutrition, to reduce the invasiveness of nutritional interventions, and to provide dietary counseling and oral supplements. Nutritional interventions are rarely indicated for patients in the last weeks of life and are recommended to focus on alleviating distressing symptoms during this period [19].
Enteral nutrition, delivering essential nutrients via tube feeding to patients unable to eat orally, is widely utilized in palliative care units [3, 20]. Consequently, nurses in these units are expected to possess adequate knowledge of enteral nutrition. Despite numerous studies examining nurses’ enteral nutrition knowledge levels [12, 2124], research on the nutritional care perceptions of palliative care nurses is limited [11, 25, 26]. Particularly in Turkey, where studies on nutrition and nursing in palliative care are scarce, there’s a need to assess nurses’ knowledge and perceptions in this context.
The aim of this study to determine the knowledge levels of nurses working in palliative care units regarding enteral nutrition practices and their perceptions of nutritional care quality in their units.

Methods

Design

This study is a cross-sectional, descriptive, quantitative research.

Setting and sample

This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between June and September 2022 in 25 palliative care units within public hospitals in İzmir, Turkey. The study population consisted of 237 nurses working in these units, all of whom were individually invited to participate by the researchers. While the study population included all palliative care nurses, the sample comprised only those who agreed to participate. Eligibility criteria required nurses to have worked in palliative care units for at least six months and to provide voluntary consent for participation. Nurses with incomplete responses to the scale items were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 205 nurses.

Data collection

The researcher provided concise information about the study during face-to-face visits and invited nurses to participate. Appointments were scheduled based on the work schedules of those who agreed to take part. At each appointment, the purpose and details of the study were explained verbally, and participants reviewed and signed informed consent forms before completing the survey. Both the verbal explanation and the consent form outlined the study’s scope and objectives, the institutions involved, the researchers’ contact information, the confidentiality of participant data, and the assurance that all data would be used exclusively for scientific purposes. Participants completed the questionnaires in a comfortable environment, typically within 8–10 min. The participant selection flowchart of the study is presented in Fig. 1. Researcher were present throughout the process to answer questions and provide any necessary support.

Data collection tools

Personal Information Form was prepared by researchers based on relevant literature [3, 7, 11, 13, 21, 24]. The form comprised 14 questions covering age, gender, education level, experience, certification, enteral nutrition training and other factors.
An Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form, developed by Koçhan and Akın (2018), was used to collect data in this study [23]. This form was designed to assess nurses’ knowledge about enteral nutrition and consists of two sections. The first section includes 17 multiple-choice questions that cover topics such as enteral nutrition solutions, evaluating nutritional tolerance, feeding products and equipment, duration of use, nasogastric tube placement, and potential complications related to enteral nutrition. The second section contains 10 statements related to the indications for enteral nutrition, types of enteral solutions, possible complications, and application practices. Participants respond to these statements with “True,” “False,” or “I don’t know/No opinion.” Each correct answer is awarded 1 point, while incorrect answers or “I don’t know/No opinion” responses receive 0 points. The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating a greater level of knowledge about enteral nutrition practices [23].
The perceived quality of nutritional care was assessed using the third section of the “Scale for Evaluating the Perceived Quality of Nutritional Care,” developed by Miriam Theilla et al. (2016) [24] and validated for reliability and validity by Kısacık et al. (2019) [27]. The scale does not provide a total score; instead, each section can be evaluated independently. This section consists of nine items that measure nurses’ perceptions of the quality of nutritional care provided in their clinics. The items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”). Scores from this section range between 9 and 45, with higher scores indicating a more positive evaluation of the perceived quality of nutritional care [27]. Permission to use the Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form and the Scale for Evaluating the Perceived Quality of Nutritional Care was obtained from the authors via email.

Data analysis

The collected data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 22.0 software. Descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, medians, minimum-maximum values, and frequency measurements, were performed. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the conformity of measurable variables to a normal distribution. Non-normally distributed data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test for comparisons between two groups and the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparisons across more than two categories. For groups with significant differences identified by the Kruskal-Wallis test, Tamhane’s T2 test was applied to determine where the differences lay. Fisher’s Exact test was used when the Chi-Square test was not applicable for categorical comparisons. Spearman correlation test was performed for correlation analyses involving non-normally distributed data. Logistic regression models were created by categorizing variables based on the median value (median value and above/below the median value) to identify factors associated with Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge and Nutritional Care Quality Perception Scores. The significance level was set at p < .05.

Results

The study included a total population of 237 nurses, with 205 nurses ultimately participating, resulting in a participation rate of 86.5%. The majority of nurses were female (94.6%) and bachelor’s degree graduates (78.5%). The median age of the nurses were 36 years (Min: 21, Max: 51). About 37.56% of nurses stated that they had never received any training on enteral nutrition, while 66.34% did not have a palliative care certificate (Table 1). In 19.51% of the units where they worked, no nutrition counseling was provided, while in 29.80% of units, counseling was provided for all patients receiving nutritional support, and in 39.51% of units, counseling was provided for some patients receiving nutritional support.
Additionally, 11.22% of participants stated that they did not have knowledge about the nutrition counseling practices implemented in their units. The median professional experience was 14 years (Min: 1, Max: 34), the median palliative care unit experience was 3 years (Min: 1, Max: 16).
The median scores for Perceived Nutritional Care Quality and Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge were 36 points (range: 9–45) and 15 points (range: 2–27), respectively. The responses to the questions assessing Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge are presented in Table 2. It was observed that questions related to fluid requirements, maintaining the patency of the jejunostomy tube, enteral administration of medications, and types of tubes used during enteral nutrition with liquid solutions were answered correctly at rates lower than 25%.
Table 1
Palliative care nurses sociodemographic and institutional characteristics (n = 205)
Characteristics
n
%
Gender
Women
194
94.6
Education
  
Health Vocational High School
8
3.9
Associate Degree
15
7.3
Bachelor’s Degree
161
78.5
Master’s Degree
21
10.2
Palliative Care Certification
Yes
69
33.6
Enteral Nutrition Training
  
Yes
128
62.4
Nutritional Counseling
Yes
  
 - All Patients
61
29.8
 -Some Patients
81
39.5
No
40
19.5
No Knowledge
23
11.2
Most Common Nutritional Support Method
ONS
37
18.0
Tube Feeding
  
 - PEG
71
34.7
 - NG
61
29.8
Parenteral
36
17.5
 
Median
Min- Max
Years of Professional Experience
14
1–34
Years of Palliative Care Experience
3
1–16
Monthly ONS Frequency
10
0-200
Monthly Tube (NG + PEG) Feeding Frequency
10
0–70
Monthly Parenteral Frequency
6
0-120
Perceived Nutritional Care Quality Score
36
9–45
ONS: Oral nutritional supplement, NG: Nasogastric tube, PEG: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
However, questions related to the use and maintenance of feeding sets/bags, nursing interventions to prevent gastrointestinal complaints during enteral nutrition with solutions, storage conditions for enteral products, care for NG tubes and PEG, infusion rates for NJ.
Table 2
Knowledge levels regarding enteral nutrition practices (n = 205)
Enteral nutrition practices knowledge form- Sect. 1
Correct answer
n
(%)
1. Which type of solutions should be preferred for enteral nutrition?
127
61.9
2. Which of the following statements is correct regarding continuous enteral feeding?
17
8.2
3. How many hours can enteral nutrition solutions remain in the feeding set?
121
59.0
4. Which of the following indicates delayed gastric emptying in enteral feeding?
69
33.6
5. How often should gastric residual volume be checked in intermittent enteral feeding to assess the tolerance of the given nutrition?
91
44.3
6. How often should the enteral nutrition bag and set be changed in tube-fed patients?
181
88.2
7. Where and for how long should enteral nutrition products be stored after opening?
159
77.5
8. What is the maximum amount of enteral nutrition product that can be given in one feeding in bolus intermittent feeding?
54
26.3
9. What is the maximum duration for each meal in intermittent enteral feeding?
77
37.5
10. To prevent possible pulmonary aspiration in patients receiving enteral nutrition, how many degrees should the patient’s head be elevated during and after enteral feeding?
131
63.9
11. Nursing interventions to prevent abdominal distension and nausea/vomiting during enteral feeding are listed below. Which one is incorrect?
166
80.9
12. Which of the following interventions regarding medication administration in patients receiving enteral nutrition is incorrect?
24
11.7
13. Which nursing interventions are important to plan to prevent blockages in a nasogastric tube in an enterally fed patients?
150
73.1
14. What can develop if the enteral feeding solution is given cold to a patient receiving enteral nutrition?
175
85.3
15. Which of the following interventions to prevent nausea and vomiting in enterally fed patients is incorrect?
179
87.3
16. Which of the following interventions is incorrect for preventing bacterial growth in feeding bags and tubes during enteral nutrition?
174
84.8
17. Which of the following methods is not used to confirm the placement of a nasogastric tube in a patient with a nasogastric tube?
168
81.9
Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form- Sect. 2
18. In patients requiring nutritional support who cannot take food orally, parenteral nutrition should be preferred initially.
94
45.8
19. Enteral feeding solutions completely meet fluid requirements.
6
2.9
20. If a patient is being fed through a jejunostomy tube, drinking water should be given through the jejunostomy tube to maintain tube patency.
20
9.7
21. Enteral feeding can be applied in cases such as intestinal obstruction, paralytic ileus, severe enteritis and peritonitis, severe diarrhea, and malabsorption.
135
65.8
22. In the nasojejunal feeding method, since the nutrition solution is given directly to the intestine, complaints due to rapid gastric emptying (Dumping syndrome) may develop.
154
75.1
23. Polyurethane and silicone tubes should be preferred in patients undergoing enteral nutrition.
165
80.4
24. Hypertonic enteral nutrition solutions may cause diarrhea.
92
44.8
25. Rapid and excessive administration of hypertonic nutrition solutions can cause dehydration.
102
49.7
26. Polyvinyl tubes should be preferred in patients where the risk of complications is low and enteral nutrition is applied.
21
10.2
27. In patients with a PEG catheter, the catheter insertion site (stoma) is cleaned using 0.9% NaCl or antiseptic solution.
161
78.5
 
Median
Min- Max
Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form- Sect. 1
11
1–17
Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form- Sect. 2
5
0–10
Total Score for the Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form
15
2–27
feeding, and nursing interventions to prevent NG tube obstruction were answered correctly at rates higher than 75% (Table 2). When the correct answer rates given to the Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form was evaluated; 0.98% (n = 2) of the participants answered < 25% of the questions, 23.41% (n = 48) answered 25–50%, 68.29% (n = 140) answered 50–75% and 7.32% (n = 15) answered > 75% correctly (Fig. 2).
There was no statistically significant difference between the correct answer rates on the Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form and the presence of a palliative care certificate. However, the rate of correct answers was higher for those who received enteral nutrition training compared to those who did not (p < .01). However, there was no statistically significant compared to those who did not (p = .008) (Table 3). Nurses who received enteral nutrition training had a higher total score on the Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form. However, there was no significant difference in the Perceived Nutritional Care Quality Scores between the two groups (p = .190). There was no statistically significant difference in the total knowledge score on the Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form (p = .846) or the Perceived Nutritional Care Quality Score (p = .496) based on the presence of a palliative care certificate.
Table 3
Distribution of correct answer rates based on palliative care certificate and enteral nutrition training status (n = 205)
The correct answer rates
Palliative care certification
 
Yes
No
p
n
%
n
%
<%25.0
2
2.9
0
0
0.129
%25.0–50.0
19
27.5
29
21.3
%50.0–75.0
42
60.8
98
72.0
>%75.0
6
8.7
9
6.6
Total
69
100.0
136
100.0
 
Enteral Nutrition Training
 
Yes
No
p
n
%
n
%
<%25.0
2
1.5
0
0
0.008*
%25.0–50.0
20
15.6
28
36.3
%50.0–75.0
93
72.6
47
61.0
>%75.0
13
10.1
2
2.6
Total
128
100.0
77
100.0
 
Fisher’s Exact testi, * p < .05
The presence of a nutrition consultant in the unit did not significantly impact the total score on the Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form (p = .543). However, it was associated with a significantly higher Perceived Nutritional Care Quality Score (p < .05). According to the Posthoc Tamhane-2 test, units with a nutrition consultant had higher Perceived Nutritional Care Quality Scores compared to those without (p = .01), indicating a statistically significant difference (Table 4).
The correlations between the Total Knowledge Score Related to Enteral Nutrition Practices and various factors, including the Perception Score of Nutritional Care Quality, monthly tube feeding frequency, monthly oral nutrition supplement (ONS) frequency, monthly parenteral nutrition frequency, years of professional experience, and years of palliative care experience, were examined. A positive correlation was found between the monthly tube feeding frequency.
Table 4
The impact of a palliative care certificate, enteral nutrition training, and nutrition counseling on the total knowledge score related to enteral nutrition practices and the perception score of nutritional care quality (n = 205)
Variables
 
Enteral nutrition practices knowledge form score
Perceived nutritional care quality score
Median score (Min-Max)
p
Median score (Min-Max)
p
Palliative Care Certification
Yes
15 (2–22)
0.846
36 (9–45)
0.496
No
15 (7–27)
36 (10–45)
Enteral Nutrition Training
Yes
16 (2–27)
< .001a*
36 (9–45)
0.190
No
14 (7–21)
36 (13–45)
Nutritional Counseling
Yes
15(8–27)
0.543
37(9–45)
.001b*
No
15(2–22)
35(19–43)
I don’t know
15(7–20)
32(13–44)
aMann-Whitney U Test, bKruskal Wallis Test, * p < .05
Table 5
The correlation between the perception score of nutritional care quality and the total knowledge score related to enteral nutrition practices (n = 205)
  
Perceived nutritional care quality score
Total score for the enteral nutrition practices knowledge form
Monthly Tube Feeding Frequency
rc
0.048
0.173
p
0.497
0.013*
Monthly ONS Frequency
r
− 0.036
0.011
p
0.613
0.876
Monthly Parenteral Nutrition Frequency
r
− 0.105
0.038
p
0.137
0.588
Years of Palliative Care Experience
r
0.14
− 0.10
p
0.839
0.888
Years of Professional Experience
r
0.107
− 0.56
p
0.126
0.429
Perceived Nutritional Care Quality Score
r
1
0.089
p
-
0.202
Total Score for Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form
r
0.089
1
p
0.202
-
ONS: Oral nutritional supplement, cSpearman Korelasyon Testi, * p < .05
and the Total Knowledge Score Related to Enteral Nutrition Practices (r = .173, p = .013). No statistically significant correlations were observed with the other variables (Table 5).
Logistic regression models showing variables associated with Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge and Nutritional Care Quality Perception Scores are given in Table 6. In terms of enteral nutrition practices knowledge scores, receiving enteral nutrition training significantly improved nurses’ knowledge levels (B = 3.148, p < .001). However, having a palliative care certificate, monthly parenteral nutrition frequency, duration of palliative care experience, and years of professional experience did not have a statistically significant effect on knowledge scores. On the other hand, monthly tube feeding frequency positively impacted knowledge scores (B = 1.036, p = .037). The model explained 15% of the variance in knowledge scores (Nagelkerke R²=0.150).
Table 6
Logistic regression models showing variables associated with enteral nutrition practices knowledge and nutritional care quality perception scores (n = 205)
 
Enteral nutrition practices knowledge score
Nutritional care quality perception score
B
%95 confidence intervals
p
B
%95 confidence intervals
p
Palliative Care Certification (Ref.=No)
0.688
0.354–1.339
0.271
0.584
0.301–1.135
0.112
Enteral Nutrition Training (Ref.=No)
3.148
1.680–5.901
< 0.001*
1.670
0.896–3.112
0.106
Montly Tube Feeding Frequency
1.036
1.002–1.072
0.037*
1.037
1.006–1.069
0.019*
Monthly Parenteral Nutrition Frequency
0.994
0.974–1.013
0.521
0.963
0.939–0.987
0.003*
Years of Palliative Care Experience
1.034
0.954–1.121
0.415
1.084
0.985–1.193
0.980
Years of Professional Experience
0.982
0.947–1.019
0.334
1.018
0.982–1.056
0.331
Nagelkerke R²
0.150
0.129
* p < .05
Regarding the perception of nutritional care quality, monthly tube feeding frequency significantly improved the perception score (B = 1.037, p = .019), whereas monthly parenteral nutrition frequency significantly reduced it (B = 0.963, p = .003). However, having a palliative care certificate, receiving enteral nutrition training, duration of palliative care experience, and years of professional experience did not have a statistically significant impact on the perception of nutritional care quality. The model explained 12.9% of the variance in the perception of nutritional care quality (Nagelkerke R²=0.129).

Discussion

This study revealed that nurses’ knowledge levels regarding enteral nutrition practices were significantly influenced by receiving enteral nutrition training and the frequency of tube feeding in their units. In contrast, possessing a palliative care certificate did not have a notable effect, suggesting a need to emphasize enteral nutrition topics in certification programs. The positive association between tube feeding frequency and both knowledge and perceived care quality underscores the importance of clinical experience in improving nurses’ expertise and awareness. Conversely, the negative impact of parenteral nutrition frequency on perceived care quality suggests that nurses may view this method as more complex and challenging. The less invasive nature of enteral nutrition and its clearer contributions to patient care likely contribute to its more favorable perception among nurses.
These findings should be contextualized within Turkey’s healthcare history, where gender bias in nursing has played a significant role. Between 1954 and 2007, Turkish nursing laws required individuals to be female to enter the profession [28]. Although this restriction has since been lifted, and men are now allowed to work as nurses, nursing continues to be perceived as a predominantly female profession, limiting the representation of male nurses [29, 30]. This gender imbalance is evident in this study, where 94.63% of participants were female nurses, consistent with previous research by Kısacık et al. (2019) and Koçhan and Akın (2018), which reported that 79% and 69% of their nursing participants, respectively, were female [23, 27].
The development of palliative care in Turkey has also influenced the findings. The expansion of palliative care centers began with the Pallia Turk project, part of the National Cancer Control Program (2009–2015), leading to a noticeable increase in these centers starting in 2012–2013 [31]. However, opportunities for nurses to work in palliative care units remain limited, resulting in relatively short employment durations in these settings. This study found that the median employment duration for nurses in palliative care centers was 3 years (minimum: 1 year, maximum: 16 years). This indicates that palliative care nursing in Turkey is still in its developmental stages, with more experienced nurses likely to remain in these roles longer.
Palliative care focuses on managing symptoms and alleviating disease-related stress in terminally ill patients, with the primary goal of improving their quality of life by relieving pain, discomfort, and emotional strain [32]. Malnutrition is a common issue among palliative care patients, often worsening as the disease progresses and increasing the need for nutritional support [33]. Proper nutritional interventions can enhance patients’ overall well-being and quality of life, making enteral nutrition a vital component of high-quality care in palliative settings [3234]. In Turkey, studies have reported a malnutrition risk exceeding 90% in palliative care units, with enteral nutrition support rates ranging between 20% and 60% [20, 35, 36]. Given the frequent use and significant benefits of enteral nutrition, it is essential for nurses to have comprehensive knowledge and skills in this area [37].
Some studies have highlighted the positive effects of early palliative care interventions, including nutritional support. According to recent ASCO recommendations, nutritional interventions primarily serve a “supportive” rather than “palliative” role [38]. For cancer patients undergoing active treatment, nutritional support can improve adherence to chemotherapy and radiotherapy while offering clinical benefits, regardless of the route of administration. However, for patients with incurable cancer, nutritional support mainly alleviates malnutrition and hunger, with limited impact on slowing disease progression and only temporary improvements in quality of life [34]. Decisions regarding nutritional support in end-of-life care are complex, often involving religious, ethical, and emotional considerations. It is recommended that these decisions be guided by clinical benefits and tailored to each patient’s specific needs, avoiding unnecessary interventions [39]. In many cases, discontinuing artificial feeding may be the best option when its burdens outweigh the potential benefits [40].
Training in enteral nutrition equips nurses to assess patients’ nutritional needs, administer enteral nutrition, monitor complications, and educate patients and their families about enteral feeding. In this study, 62.4% of participating nurses reported having received training in enteral nutrition. Previous studies in Turkey have reported varying rates of such training among nurses, ranging from 7.8 to 62% [23, 27, 41, 42]. This variation may reflect differences in institutional policies, patient populations, or the timing of the studies. Research has shown that educational programs for nurses significantly improve their knowledge, performance, and practices related to enteral nutrition [22, 4345]. In the present study, nurses who received enteral nutrition training scored significantly higher on the Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form compared to those without training (p < .01). However, even among trained nurses, only 10.16% answered more than 75% of the questions correctly, while 17.18% answered less than 50% correctly. Insufficient knowledge and improper practices in providing enteral nutrition can negatively affect care quality and patient safety. Conversely, well-implemented nutritional nursing care can improve patients’ nutritional status and clinical outcomes [22, 43]. Regular and continuous education is, therefore, essential to enhance nurses’ enteral nutrition practices and improve the overall quality of care.
This study found that nurses’ knowledge regarding enteral nutrition practices was at a moderate level, aligning with previous research conducted in Turkey [23, 27]. For example, Koçhan and Akın (2018) reported that nurses had insufficient knowledge in areas such as the storage conditions of enteral products, tolerance of feeds, gastric residual volume indicating delayed gastric emptying, and medication administration in enterally fed patients [23]. Another study revealed that nurses performed better in questions related to skin problems around stomas (83.53%), feeding positions (80.59%), and interventions to prevent nausea and vomiting (73.53%). However, they struggled with questions on residual volume (88.82% incorrect), pulmonary aspiration (61.76% incorrect), and tube care (56.47% incorrect) [27, 41]. Similarly, in the current study, questions about fluid requirements during tube feeding (2.9% correct), maintaining the patency of jejunostomy tubes (9.8% correct), and medication administration (11.71% correct) received the lowest correct response rates.
For patients receiving tube feeding, fluid requirements are calculated as 1 mL/kcal unless fluid restriction is applied. Since commonly used isocaloric formulas are approximately 75% water, additional fluid support—typically at least 25% of the feeding volume—is required. The remaining fluid needs can be met with drinking water, including the water used for tube flushing [23, 46, 47]. Notably, one of the most incorrectly answered questions in this study was, “Enteral nutrition solutions completely meet fluid requirements,” with only 2.92% of nurses answering correctly. This indicates a lack of knowledge among nurses about the water content of enteral formulas and how to calculate daily fluid requirements.
Maintaining feeding tube patency is essential, as blockages can occur due to various factors. Proper flushing is critical for preventing these blockages. Tubes should be flushed with water every 4–6 h during continuous feeding and before and after each feeding during intermittent feeding. If the tube is not in use, it should be flushed every eight hours. To prevent blockages caused by drug and formula interactions, flushing before and after drug administration is also recommended [48]. In this study, while 73.17% of nurses correctly answered the question about preventing blockages in nasogastric tubes, only 9.76% correctly answered the question about maintaining patency in jejunostomy tubes. This discrepancy may be attributed to the more frequent use of PEG and NG tubes in clinical settings compared to jejunostomy tubes.
Feeding tubes are also used for administering medications, but incorrect preparation or administration can negatively impact patients [49]. Studies have shown that nurses often lack sufficient knowledge to prevent drug interactions in enteral drug administration, with varying practices in flushing protocols [5052]. Educational interventions have been shown to improve nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in this area significantly. For instance, a case-control study in Iran found that in-service training for intensive care nurses improved their practices and increased consultations with pharmacists regarding medication administration [21]. Similar findings were reported in Jordan, where training enhanced nurses’ knowledge of tube cleaning, medication preparation, and dosage form recognition [53]. In Turkey, a training program for 90 nurses across neurology clinics, palliative care units, and intensive care units improved their knowledge and attitudes regarding medication administration through enteral routes [54]. In the present study, the correct response rate for medication administration-related questions was only 11.7%. These findings emphasize the need for targeted training programs for nurses in palliative care units, particularly focusing on medication administration in patients receiving tube feeding. Such training could significantly enhance nurses’ knowledge and improve patient care outcomes.
In 2015, the Turkish Ministry of Health introduced the Palliative Care Nursing Certification Training Program, which includes 35 h of theoretical instruction and 80 h of practical training, valid for five years. The program aims to equip nurses caring for palliative care patients with essential knowledge, skills, and attitudes [55]. While the theoretical section covers topics such as “Total Parenteral/Enteral Nutrition Application,” these topics are not included in the practical training component. In the present study, 33.66% of nurses reported completing the certification training program. However, only 7.32% of these nurses correctly answered more than 75.0% of the questions on the Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form. Furthermore, holding a palliative care certificate was found to have no significant effect on the scores of the Enteral Nutrition Practices Knowledge Form or the Perceived Nutritional Care Quality Score. These findings suggest the need to enhance the certification program by expanding its focus on enteral nutrition and integrating this topic into the practical training section.
Hospitals with established Nutrition Support Teams (NST) can provide more individualized nutrition care [56]. Research shows that NSTs significantly reduce nutrition-related complications, facilitate the early detection of malnutrition, minimize calorie deficits, and lower healthcare costs [5759]. Globally, nutrition counseling teams are becoming more prevalent in hospitals [59]. However, a study by Kurt and Paslı Gündoğan (2023) found that 48.3% of nurses in intensive care units in Turkey reported the absence of NSTs in their institutions [60]. This underscores the need to expand NSTs across hospital settings.
In the current study, 29.8% of nurses stated they received nutrition consultation services for all patients requiring nutritional support, while 39.5% reported receiving these services for some patients. The presence of nutrition counseling teams was found to significantly influence the Perceived Nutritional Care Quality Score among groups. Interestingly, 11.22% of nurses were unaware of whether nutrition counseling services were available in their palliative care units. This lack of awareness highlights the need for better communication and training regarding unit-specific nutrition support protocols. Continuous education on the importance of nutrition support should be provided in units where such services are frequently utilized. Additionally, orientation training for new staff should include information about the unit’s nutrition support practices to ensure consistency and awareness.
This study highlights the significant impact of enteral nutrition training on improving nurses’ knowledge levels. However, the expected effect of having a palliative care certificate on knowledge levels was not observed, suggesting that certification programs may need to place greater emphasis on enteral nutrition topics. The positive influence of tube feeding frequency on both knowledge and perceived care quality underscores the importance of clinical experience in enhancing nurses’ knowledge and awareness. In contrast, the negative impact of parenteral nutrition frequency on perceived care quality suggests that nurses may perceive this method as more complex and challenging. The less invasive nature of enteral nutrition and its clearer contributions to patient care may explain the more favorable perceptions of this method. Based on these findings, developing more comprehensive and targeted training programs for both enteral and parenteral nutrition practices is essential to improve nurses’ skills and perceptions. These findings are consistent with existing literature. For example, Kurt and Ceyhan (2023) found that enteral nutrition training significantly enhanced the knowledge levels of intensive care nurses [61]. Similarly, Carrasco et al. (2023) demonstrated that educational interventions incorporating clinical simulation effectively improved nurses’ understanding of enteral nutrition practices [62]. Additionally, Yu et al. (2022) reported that implementing an enteral nutrition nursing quality control system in clinical practice not only increased nurses’ knowledge but also improved patient safety and care quality [63].

Strengths and limitations

A major strength of this study is its use of validated evaluation tools to comprehensively assess nurses’ knowledge and perceptions of enteral nutrition practices. Thorough data analysis was conducted, examining correlations between variables using a variety of statistical methods. The study provides relevant insights for improving enteral nutrition practices in palliative care and designing targeted educational interventions. Additionally, the inclusion of contextual factors, such as gender bias and Turkey’s evolving palliative care landscape, enriches the findings’ interpretation.
However, the study is limited by its reliance on data from a single province, which may reduce the generalizability of the findings. While the sample of 205 nurses offers valuable localized insights, it may not fully represent the diversity of palliative care nurses across Turkey. Additionally, self-reported data introduces potential bias, as reported practices may not always reflect actual behaviors. Future studies should use broader sampling strategies and objective assessments of nursing practices to address these limitations.

Conclusion

Nurses play a vital role in implementing nutritional interventions and ensuring the quality of nutrition care. This study found that nurses demonstrated moderate knowledge levels regarding enteral nutrition practices, with gaps in critical areas such as fluid requirements and tube maintenance. Enteral nutrition training and frequent exposure to tube feeding were positively associated with higher knowledge scores, while the presence of nutrition consultants improved perceived care quality. However, parenteral nutrition practices negatively impacted perceived care quality, indicating a need for targeted interventions in this area.
To enhance care quality in palliative care settings, regular training programs, the formation of nutrition support teams, and the dissemination of best practices in enteral nutrition are crucial. Focused educational interventions should prioritize areas such as fluid requirements, tube maintenance, and medication administration. Additionally, the presence of nutrition counseling teams underscores the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to achieve better patient outcomes.

Acknowledgements

Our sincere thanks go to all participants of the study.

Declerations

Non-Interventional Clinical Studies Ethics Committee of Health Sciences University Tepecik Training and Research Hospital (Approval no. 2022/01–26, Approved date: 17.01.2022) approved the proposal. The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. The participants were informed of the study’s goal and given the assurance that their nonparticipation or withdrawal would not affect them negatively. The written consent forms were obtained from all participants.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Anhänge

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cimete G. End-of-Life Care: a holistic Approach in terminally ill patients. Istanbul: Nobel Medical Publishing; 2002. (in Turkish). Cimete G. End-of-Life Care: a holistic Approach in terminally ill patients. Istanbul: Nobel Medical Publishing; 2002. (in Turkish).
8.
Zurück zum Zitat de Oliveira LC, Rosa KSDC, Gaspar T, Paiva BSR, Paiva CE, Peres WAF. Clinical usefulness of the patient-generated subjective Global Assessment and modified Glasgow Prognostic score in decision making concerning the indication of enteral nutritional therapy in patients with incurable cancer receiving palliative care. Nutrition. 2023;112:112057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2023.112057.CrossRefPubMed de Oliveira LC, Rosa KSDC, Gaspar T, Paiva BSR, Paiva CE, Peres WAF. Clinical usefulness of the patient-generated subjective Global Assessment and modified Glasgow Prognostic score in decision making concerning the indication of enteral nutritional therapy in patients with incurable cancer receiving palliative care. Nutrition. 2023;112:112057. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​nut.​2023.​112057.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Berggren E, Ödlund Olin A, Orrevall Y, Strang P, Johansson SE, Törnkvist L. Early palliative home care: evaluation of an interprofessional educational intervention for district nurses and general practitioners about nutritional care. SAGE Open Med. 2017;18:5:2050312117726465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117726465.CrossRef Berggren E, Ödlund Olin A, Orrevall Y, Strang P, Johansson SE, Törnkvist L. Early palliative home care: evaluation of an interprofessional educational intervention for district nurses and general practitioners about nutritional care. SAGE Open Med. 2017;18:5:2050312117726465. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​2050312117726465​.CrossRef
27.
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Carrasco V, De Freitas MIP, São-João TM, Eduardo AHA, Oliveira-Kumakura ARDS. Effect of an educational intervention on nursing knowledge about enteral nutrition therapy: a quasi-experimental study. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2023;13(5). https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v13n5p1. Carrasco V, De Freitas MIP, São-João TM, Eduardo AHA, Oliveira-Kumakura ARDS. Effect of an educational intervention on nursing knowledge about enteral nutrition therapy: a quasi-experimental study. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2023;13(5). https://​doi.​org/​10.​5430/​jnep.​v13n5p1.
Metadaten
Titel
Enhancing nutritional care in palliative care units: assessing nurse knowledge and quality perception in enteral nutrition practices
verfasst von
Zehra Batu
Gül Bülbül Maraş
Kadriye Turan
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02580-x