Background
Bullying describes intentional, aggressive behaviours by individuals or groups who often yield significant power and therefore inflict harm on their victims [
1]. Several studies have demonstrated the negative impact of bullying in academic settings, and victims often experience psychological distress [
2]. Emotions influence learning outcomes, and while positive emotions and an enabling learning environment are associated with improved academic performance, negative emotions such as anger and shame resulting from bullying can derail academic goals [
3]. However, acts of mistreatment are seen as a normal rite of passage in the nursing profession, and studies indicate that most nursing students contend with repeated acts of bullying [
4]. This is because the nursing profession is characterized by power imbalances, and more experienced nurses are often hostile and treat their subordinates in a condescending manner [
5]. Nursing students, who have limited clinical experience and low self-esteem due to a lack confidence in their abilities are therefore frequent targets of bullying [
6].
While recent efforts have emphasized the need to dismantle the institutional dynamics that condone bullying in clinical settings, the problem still persists [
7] and is perpetuated by a culture where previous victims of bullying become perpetrators when they themselves are in a position of authority [
8]. This is counterproductive for a field that aims to produce compassionate and empathetic professionals. Not surprisingly, there are progressively waning levels of empathy among nursing practitioners towards their patients over the course of their nursing education and clinical practice [
9].
High-income countries like the United States of America recognize the negative impact of bullying, and health agencies such as the American Nursing Association have increased awareness of this issue [
10]. Despite these efforts, high rates of bullying among nursing students continue to be reported in the USA [
11], Australia [
12] and other developed countries. A study conducted in China [
13] revealed that the bullying of nursing students, especially during clinical placement, is a pressing concern, with more than 65% of the students surveyed experiencing some form of bullying from senior nursing staff, nursing teachers, patients and caregivers of patients. High rates of bullying thrive in this setting because inadequate numbers of staff and increased workloads result in frustration among senior staff members and patients. Similar conditions are common in Sierra Leone health facilities, where very few nurses deliver patient care [
14]. This could make student nurses in Sierra Leone more vulnerable to bullying. A study conducted among nursing students in Sri Lanka revealed that the country’s patriarchal structure makes nursing students, who are predominantly females, vulnerable to bullying [
15]. In such settings, women are trained to be timid; therefore, they rarely confront or report perpetrators of mistreatment. A study conducted in four African countries found that while women dominated the nursing profession, they were relegated to low cadre positions and seldomly held management positions [
16].
It is therefore very important to study bullying among nursing students in African countries, where the predominantly low socioeconomic status of residents [
17] and deeply entrenched patriarchal cultures that encourage gender inequalities and relegate women to positions of submissiveness [
18] would allow the bullying of nursing students to thrive. While there is a paucity of research on this topic in African countries, research conducted in Ghana has revealed that student nurses are expected to act submissively towards their superiors while they are treated dismissively and often face acts of aggression and humiliation [
8].
Nursing students who encounter bullying suffer severe physical, mental and professional difficulties which ultimately contributes to staffing shortages and derails patient care [
19], this would have devastating effects on countries such as Sierra Leone, which is already in dire need of more health professionals. Similar concerns were expressed by a study reporting that exposure to bullying negatively influenced job satisfaction among Zimbabwean nurses which could negatively influence the care of patients in an already under resourced health setting [
20].
Despite these concerns, no study assessing the effects of bullying among nursing students, to our knowledge, has been conducted in Sierra Leone. Furthermore, studies have emphasized that bullying negatively affects academic performance of nursing students. This may inadvertently lead to the belief that students who excel academically are less affected by bullying, especially since there is a paucity of research evaluating if the effects of bullying are different for high achieving and low achieving nursing students. This knowledge is important as it could demonstrate that bullying experiences cause harm to all nursing students. Therefore, students regardless of their academic performance may still struggle due to mistreatment.
By separately describing the effects of bullying experiences on nursing students with both high and low GPA scores in Sierra Leone, this research aims to initiate important discussions and provide a clear justification for the need for policies that deter abusive behaviors and compel the reform of nursing education in Sierra Leone.
Methods
Research aims
To describe the effects of bullying behaviours among nursing students with higher than average and lower than average GPA in Sierra Leone.
Epistemological stance
This study utilizes a constructivist approach. Experiences of bullying are subjective, this was demonstrated by a response to a senior medical professional, expressing strong disagreement with his claim that bullying was no longer present in the medical profession [
21]. This demonstrates that perceptions regarding the effects of bullying may vary depending on individuals’ experiences, cultures, and specific context.
The constructivist approach acknowledges that reality is subjective and co-constructed based off human experiences [
22]. The findings proposed by this research represent the views of the students who participated in this research and may not apply invariably to all students. While the findings may prompt action, further research is needed on the topic, and policy makers must recognize the evolving nature of bullying and offer solutions that reflect unique individual experiences at a given time.
Research design
This research uses an exploratory qualitative study design with data collection done through a series of semi-structured interviews.
Experiences with bullying and are influenced by sociodemographic characteristics [
23] which differ across countries, so while research has been conducted in high-income countries on the effects of bullying on nursing students, the findings cannot be assumed to be generalizable to the Sierra Leone context. Exploratory qualitative research design which is useful for phenomena that are not well researched was therefore used to ensure findings were authentic and told from the perspective of nursing students.
Setting
The study was conducted in Njala University School of Nursing and Mattru School of Nursing Sierra Leone. Mattru school of nursing offers a three-year RN program as the highest available qualification while Njala University offers a four-year BSc in Nursing program. In both institutions students undergo clinical placement in different hospital facilities from the second year of study.
Recruitment and sampling
Participants were recruited based on the following inclusion and exclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria
1.
A nursing student who has spent at least one year on a programme of study at one of the institutions under study.
2.
Students who consent to having their course grades shared with researchers.
3.
Students who consent to participate in the interviews.
Exclusion criteria
1.
Nursing students below the age of 18.
2.
Students who withheld consent.
The researchers provided an overview of the study to a gathering of students at each of the institutions under study. Students who expressed interest in participating in the research had another face-to-face meeting with the researchers where they received a more detailed explanation of the research aims and processes. They were encouraged to ask questions and seek clarification. At this time written consent was sought allowing the researchers to access the academic records of eligible students. The research utilized a purposive sampling method and participants were selected based on the subsequent assessment of their academic performance. The GPA was used as a measure of academic performance and the average GPA of each class under study was determined. There were six rounds of data collection and for each round of data collection, four students were enrolled from each of the two institutions for a total of eight participants. Two of the selected students from each university had GPA scores that were above the average for their class, and the other two scores fell below the average of the class. Students who were selected to participate in each round of interviews were informed through a telephone call and interview dates were scheduled.
Following the first two rounds of interviews, the researchers purposely selected participants from higher than average and lower than average GPA groups with additional characteristics deemed necessary to contribute to the exploration of initially identified patterns in the data. For example, in the third round of interviews, the researchers purposefully selected only female students to explore a pattern regarding sexual harassment of female students that had emerged from the data collected during the first and second rounds.
Data collection instrument and strategy
A series of individual semi-structured interviews were conducted at both institutions over a one-month period. Pretesting of the data collection instrument involved administering questions to four students: two from each university to gauge the student’s understanding of the questions. These students were not specifically selected or categorized based on their academic performance and their responses are not included in the findings of this research.
Semi structured interviews were conducted via an interview guide (see supplemental file
1 below) with the following three open-ended questions:
1.
Describe any instances when you have felt bullied during your time in nursing school.
2.
Explain how serious problem bullying is for nursing students in your school.
3.
Describe any measures you are aware of to prevent bullying and punish those responsible for the bullying of nursing students.
If participants described instances of bullying, these additional two questions were asked.
4.
Describe how the bullying you have encountered may have affected your ability to achieve your academic goals.
5.
Explain how you cope with and overcome bullying as a nursing student.
Following the interview, each participant was required to complete a demographic questionnaire. Following each round of data collection, the interview guide questions were reviewed to ensure a deeper exploration of the emerging concepts.
The interviews were conducted at the university campus premises. The interviews lasted between 30 and 50 min and were conducted in the local Krio language or English to allow the participants to fully express their feelings in the language with which they felt more comfortable. The interviews were audiotape recorded, translated and transcribed verbatim to ensure the completeness of the data. There was consensus among all the researchers that data saturation had been reached after the fourth round of interviews. However, two further rounds of interviews were conducted following this.
Data analysis
Data analysis followed each round of data collection and was performed separately for interviews of students with higher-than-average GPA and those with lower-than-average GPA. The analysis initially followed an inductive approach, and open coding was performed by the first and second researchers following familiarization with the eight transcribed interviews obtained from the first round of data collection. The process was repeated for the transcripts following the second round of data collection. Each transcript was coded independently by the two researchers who then met and reached a consensus with regards categorizing codes and identifying emerging patterns in the data.
Following this, the analysis took a deductive approach, and focused coding guided by initially identified patterns was performed for subsequent transcripts. Following this, the three researchers through an online deliberative meeting, organized and merged the identified codes into the two overarching themes of sensitization and apathy among students with higher than average and lower than average GPA respectively. Subthemes were also created during this process. A consensus was reached by all the researchers regarding the final themes and subthemes reported in this study.
Positionality of researchers
The first and second researchers are medical doctors who studied in Sierra Leone and graduated six years prior to undertaking this research. The third researcher is a senior nursing officer who graduated four years ago. As medical professionals with personal experiences of bullying, the participants may have regarded the researchers as insiders; such insider status would allow for acceptance and trust and guarantee a willingness to share information [
24]. However an imbalance of power between the researcher and participants may lead participants to feel compelled to share data, even when they are not comfortable, resulting in inaccurate accounts of their experiences [
25]. Student nurses may therefore have viewed the researchers who are experienced clinicians as superiors, which may have affected their interactions with the researchers and, by extension, the validity of findings.
Notably, senior colleagues may be perpetrators of abuse for nursing students; therefore, the researchers may be viewed by students as sharing similarities with the perpetrators of their mistreatment, further emphasizing potential power imbalances and the possibility of generating unreliable information owing to the personal identities of the researchers in this study.
Enhancing rigor
The first step towards addressing biases in this research was self-reflection and transparency among all the researchers regarding how their identities may subconsciously bias the findings of this research. Acknowledging the need for open mindedness, which requires the researcher to actively seek out and consider opposing views and evidence that may challenge their own beliefs [
26], An expert who has conducted extensive educational research was also invited to conduct an external review of the entire research process. While this external reviewer did not participate in conducting the research, she was consulted and gave valuable advice towards the conduct of the study.
In addition, the findings following each round of data collection and analysis were shared with randomly selected students from both institutions who had participated in the interviews to determine if the results obtained were representative of their views.
Discussion
For students with higher-than-average GPA, the theme of sensitization demonstrated that they had accepted the inevitability of bullying, however it was still a significant source of distress to them. For students with lower-than-average GPA, there was a sense of apathy towards their education because of bullying behaviours. Therefore, bullying had negative effects on all students regardless of their academic performance.
Almost all the students who were interviewed had experienced bullying during their time in nursing school. Nursing students are among the most vulnerable groups in clinical practice, as they often lack knowledge and skills and are thus at the bottom of the historically hierarchical healthcare profession [
27]. Predictably, bullying rates among nursing students are high, with research conducted in Canada finding that up to 80% of surveyed students were victims of bullying during their nursing education [
28]. According to another study conducted in China stated that, 96% of nursing students had encountered at least one instance of bullying in the last six months [
29].
Owing to the perceived low status of nursing students, they are vulnerable to mistreatment from various sources, including their colleagues and other clinicians, whom they rely on for guidance and teaching [
30]. This is corroborated by this study, as the students faced bullying from different sources, including their peers and patients, but the most frequent perpetrators of bullying were the lecturers within the institution. However, while a study conducted among nursing students in Egypt revealed that bullying increased as students progressed in their education and started clinical placement, this research revealed comparable rates of bullying regardless of the year of study [
31]. This may be explained by the fact that while bullying experiences intensified for students on clinical rotations, students in the earlier years of study also had to deal with bullying from older colleagues, who were frequently listed as perpetrators of abuse.
This study shows that bullying of nursing students can result in negative psychological effects and all students regardless of their academic performance contended with feelings of shame, and diminished confidence due to bullying experiences. Other studies have similarly emphasized the severe negative consequences bullying can have, with bullying behaviours contributing to high rates of depression, poor self-image and a lack of academic satisfaction [
32]. For students with low academic performance, there were additional feelings of resentment and self-blame for ill treatment which also contributed to the distress victims of bullying faced. These feeling resulted in the intense apathy demonstrated by students in this group who reported missing classes and ignoring studies because of the mistreatment they received from their lecturers. This further derailed their academic goals. Similar findings among nursing students in Saudi Arabia demonstrate the physical and emotional toll bullying can have on nursing students, ultimately results in negative consequences for their academic performance [
33].
Both groups of students demonstrated widespread acceptance of bullying behaviours, as they asserted that they always had to be prepared to receive routine acts of mistreatment over the course of their education. Acceptance of bullying was also a major reason why, for all the interviewed students in this research, bullying had gone unreported. These findings are consistent with those in a study conducted among Canadian nursing students that found nursing students often normalize and minimize the severity of bullying and thus fail to take any action against it [
34]. For students with lower-than-average GPA, there was even a feeling that bullying was justified, with these students blaming themselves rather than the perpetrators for these actions. Another study reported similar findings, stating that students experiencing bullying as a coping strategy make excuses for the perpetrators of their mistreatment [
35]. This self-blame contributed towards the feelings of apathy demonstrated by this group of students.
Students with higher-than-average GPA coped with the impact of bullying by resolving to work hard to attain a position within the nursing profession where they would not be subjected to demeaning treatments. While this was an important coping strategy for this group and may have helped mitigate the devastating effects that bullying may otherwise have had. It reinforced their belief that, in attaining a higher position within the nursing profession, they would be justified in exhibiting the same unpleasant behaviors they are victims of. This concern has been raised in a study that described the dangers of toxic cycle in which victims of bullying within the nursing profession end up inflicting abuse when they are in a position of power. The study stated that the notion that bullying is a rite of passage for nurses, helps perpetuate the negative culture of bullying within the field [
36].
While male and female students in this study had similar experiences of bullying, female students had to contend with sexual harassment. Sexual harassment was reported by several female students regardless of their academic performance. While sexual harassment was reported by females in every year of study, it reportedly intensified for students on clinical placement. This resulted in some students avoiding the wards and refusing to contribute during ward teachings to avoid lewd and inappropriate comments, which they stated were very common during rotations. Other studies have reported that sexual harassment is a common occurrence for nursing students on clinical rotation, with verbal sexual harassment being the most common form of harassment inflicted on nursing students [
37]. The main perpetrators of harassment during clinical rotations in this study were young medical doctors, who the students stated often sexualized them and spoke of them in a demeaning way. Generally, nurses are regarded as subservient to doctors in most clinical settings [
38] this power imbalance may have allowed the sexual harassment and other forms of mistreatment reported in this study to be unchecked.
Apathy towards learning is as a major barrier that derails academic success. It describes a lack of motivation or interest, which can affect students, resulting in absenteeism and other negative behaviors [
39] and can cause academic frustration among students [
40]. Therefore, the apathy described by students with lower-than-average GPA because of bullying experiences may further contribute to and worsen their below-average academic performance. This emphasizes far reaching negative effects that bullying can have on nursing students. Consistent with findings of another study, this research also demonstrated that apathy and disillusionment resulted in students regretting their choice of nursing as a profession, this further demonstrates the deep-seated negative effects bullying experiences have on nursing students [
41].
Limitations
This study is subject to limitations. This study explored students’ experiences of bullying while they were in nursing school, which depends on their recollection of past experiences. This creates the potential for recall biases, as students may have been unable to correctly remember or narrate their experiences. We acknowledge this study was conducted among two nursing schools in the same region of the country and may therefore not be indicative of the experiences of nursing students nationwide. Wider studies covering nursing students in different regions of the country would therefore be beneficial and add to the discourse regarding bullying of nursing students in Sierra Leone.
Owing to predicted time challenges, only one data collection strategy in the form of individual in-depth interviews was used. Utilizing more than one method would have been beneficial. For example, the group dynamics in focus group discussions would have helped encourage responses from participants who are reluctant to share their experiences, and the responses of peers may have helped improve the recall of otherwise forgotten instances of abuse.
Conclusion
Nursing as a profession has deeply entrenched hierarchal structures that allow a bullying culture to thrive, and nursing students are frequently victims of mistreatment from more senior colleagues.
This qualitative exploratory research utilized semi-structured interviews to explore the effects of bullying experiences among students with higher-than-average GPA and those with below average GPA in two Sierra Leonean nursing schools. Following six rounds of data collection and analysis the study determined that, various forms of bullying were common in both nursing schools and constitute a source of distress for students regardless of their academic performance. While bullying was widely accepted by all the students, it still resulted in feelings of apathy in students with lower-than-average GPA scores, while students with higher-than-average GPA had become sensitized to its effects.
Sierra Leone struggles with poor health outcomes due to several factors, including a shortage of healthcare workers. Despite the dire consequences bullying may have on the wellbeing of nursing students and by extension the country’s health system, there is a paucity of research examining this topic and its implications for students. This study was done to determine the effects of bullying experiences on nursing students and determine if these effects affected all students regardless of their academic performance. This research aims to prompt action by policy makers and stakeholders to ensure steps are taken for the protection of Sierra Leone nursing students.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.