Introduction
Methods
Design and sample
Quantitative data
Qualitative data
User involvement
Ethics
Results
Quantitative data
Total N = 396 | Year 1 N = 142 | Year 2 N = 127 | Year 3 N = 127 | P-values* | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Years in nursing school | |||||
1 2 3 | 142 (36%) 127 (32%) 127 (32%) | ||||
Age, years | |||||
< 25 25–29 ≥ 30 | 278 (70%) 46 (12%) 72 (18%) | 112 (79%) 11 (8%) 19 (13%) | 86 (65) 26 (20%) 15 (12%) | 80 (63%) 20 (16%) 27 (21%) | 0.056 |
Living alone | |||||
No Yes | 332 (84%) 64 (16%) | 120 (85%) 22 (15%) | 108 (85%) 19 (15%) | 104 (82%) 23 (18%) | 0.764 |
Number of times tested for COVID-19 | |||||
Never 1 2 3 ≥ 4 | 154 (39%) 124 (31%) 60 (15%) 40 (10%) 18 (5%) | 58 (41%) 44 (31%) 15 (11%) 16 (11%) 9 (6%) | 46 (36%) 42 (33%) 27 (21%) 10 (8%) 2 (2%) | 50 (39%) 38 (30%) 18 (14%) 14 (11%) 7 (6%) | 0.237 |
Quarantine status related to COVID-19 | |||||
Never Previous Now | 236 (60%) 157 (39%) 3 (1%) | 77(54%) 63 (44%) 2 (2%) | 78 (61%) 48 (38%) 1 (1%) | 81 (64%) 46 (36%) 0 | 0.383 |
At risk for COVID-19 complications | |||||
No Uncertain Yes | 49 (10%) 323 (82%) 33 (8%) | 16 (11%) 114 (80%) 12 (9%) | 16 (13%) 103 (81%) 8 (6%) | 8 (6%) 106 (84%) 13 (10%) | 0.397 |
Trust in governmental handling of the COVID-19 situation | |||||
Strongly disagree/disagree Neither disagree nor agree Agree Strongly agree | 36 (9%) 44 (18%) 200 (50%) 89 (22%) | 14 (6%) 30 (21%) 67 (47%) 31 (22%) | 4 (3%) 29 (23%) 68 (53%) 26 (20%) | 18 (14%) 12 (9%) 65 (51%) 32 (25%) | 0.016 |
Trust in universities’ handling of the COVID-19 situation | |||||
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither disagree nor agree Agree Strongly agree | 18 (4%) 44 (11%) 112 (28%) 180 (46%) 42 (11%) | 5 (4%) 17 (12%) 37 (26%) 67 (47%) 16 (11%) | 4 (3%) 17 (13%) 47 (37%) 50 (39%) 28 (22%) | 9 (7%) 10 (8%) 28 (22%) 63 (50%) 17 (13%) | 0.080 |
Concern about the quality of education | |||||
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither disagree nor agree Agree Strongly agree | 22 (5%) 34 (9%) 64 (16%) 142 (36%) 134 (34%) | 3 (2%) 6 (4%) 17 (12%) 50 (35%) 66 (47%) | 6 (5%) 13 (10%) 21 (17%) 40 (31%) 47 (37%) | 13 (10%) 15 (12%) 26 (21%) 52 (41%) 21 (16%) | < 0.001 |
Fear of COVID-19 (Mean (SD)) | 2.3 (0.7) | 2.5 (0.8) | 2.3 (0.7) | 2.2 (0.7) | 0.026 |
Feeling lonely due to COVID-19 | |||||
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither disagree nor agree Agree Strongly agree | 33 (8%) 61 (15%) 80 (20%) 130 (32%) 92 (23%) | 8 (6%) 16 (11%) 23 (16%) 53 (37%) 42 (30%) | 10 (8%) 21 (16%) 28 (22%) 40 (32%) 28 (22%) | 15 (12%) 24 (19%) 29 (23%) 37 (29%) 22 (17%) | 0.096 |
Engagement in clinical practice during the pandemic | |||||
Yes No | 246 (62%) 150 (38%) | 12 (9%) 130 (91%) | 117 (92%) 10 (8%) | 127 (92%) 10 (8%) | < 0.001 |
Have you during the pandemic been in contact with patients with the following situation? | |||||
Patients with unclear COVID-19 status Patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection Both (unclear and/or confirmed) None of them | 148 (61%) 7 (3%) 35 (15%) 52 (21%) | 3 1 0 6 | 64 (55%) 2 (2%) 11 (9%) 39 (34%) | 81 (70%) 4 (3%) 24 (21%) 7 (6%) | < 0.001 |
Self-imposed quarantine during clinical practice | |||||
Yes No | 105 (43%) 137 (57%) | 2 8 | 43 (37%) 73 (63%) | 60 (52%) 56 (48%) | 0.025 |
Necessary knowledge of infection control | Concerns about getting infected during clinical practice | Concerns about infecting patients during clinical practice | Concerns about high absenteeism during clinical practice | Concerns about completion of clinical practice | Fewer learning situations during clinical practice | Insufficient guidance during clinical practice | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly disagree | 4 (2%) | 14 (6%) | 6 (2%) | 14 (6%) | 8 (3%) | 34 (14%) | 54 (22%) |
Disagree | 20 (8%) | 30 (12%) | 23 (10%) | 12 (5%) | 8 (3%) | 46 (19%) | 84 (35%) |
Neither disagree nor agree | 39 (16%) | 31 (13%) | 7 (3%) | 19 (8%) | 14 (6%) | 39 (16%) | 45 (18%) |
Agree | 127 (53%) | 98 (40%) | 87 (36%) | 61 (25%) | 67 (28%) | 76 (31%) | 38 (16%) |
Strongly agree | 52 (21%) | 69 (29%) | 119 (49%) | 136 (56%) | 145 (60%) | 47 (19%) | 21 (9%) |
Qualitative data
Missing the social dimension of learning
To get to know fellow students and the professors was considered important for optimal learning. The digital solutions made it hard to meet fellow students, and it was difficult to establish new friendships. The social part of being a student and the possibility to see other students was emphasized as important for student learning and well-being. The students’ motivation for learning decreased, so did their feeling of university belonging.“You get a lot of free learning from going to campus. You may ask your fellow students or your professor if you did not understand something, and then maybe you start a discussion in a group. This is something you don’t get the opportunity to do now.” (Focus group nr 3)
Second- and third-year students underlined the importance of the “free learning” they received when they had the opportunity to attend campus, ask questions, discuss, and revise a lesson. Students with an established network felt more privileged than first-year students. Some students went to the university library just to watch digital tutorials and meet a few fellow students during breaks. One of the year 2 students said,“You don’t belong. You lose your sense of purpose.” (Focus group nr 5)
“I am very happy that I was in year 2 and not in year 1 when the society went into lockdown.” (Focus group nr 2)
Worries and challenges in clinical placement
Some students did not meet some of the required learning outcomes, while others’ experience was to reach them satisfactorily. It had recently been a discussion among the students about a generation of nurses receiving a second-best education due to lack of experience and learning; however, most of the students in the present study did not feel so.“It is not just the fear of catching the virus or spreading the virus but also the fear of the consequences of a positive test and the quarantine. Do I have to postpone my authorization as a nurse due to lack of clinical practice?” (Focus group nr 5)
The students had to adapt to the national restrictions and rules, which constantly varied during the first year of the pandemic due to transmission rate and number of vaccinated patients and staff. The guidelines from the university were unclear, especially in the beginning of the pandemic. A few students experienced a placement that did not want students due to work overload and unclear situations, although most students were satisfied with their supervisors who had walked the extra mile to assist them.“There are several nursing students at other universities in the country who are going to finish their studies this spring who feel they will end as a second-best nurse. This is not the case for us. I feel like a trained and proper nurse.” (Focus group nr 2)
As a result of contact with a high number of persons in clinical practice, the students reduced the number of persons they met in their spare time.“I can imagine the newspaper; nursing student brought the virus into the nursing home and 5 patients died.” (Focus group nr 4)
Experiencing normal instructive days in clinical placement
Furthermore, as nursing students they were expected to have more than average knowledge about hygiene and infection control. They felt responsibilities to act as role models. One student highlighted this and said,“I was in the frontline at the emergency ward and saw how severely ill the patients could be.” (Focus group nr 4)
Being “inside” the pandemic brought new perspectives. The students had experienced the overwhelming workload within the health care system through the pandemic, gaining a perspective that other students may miss.“I remember my own attitude to hygiene before the corona. I could be sloppy sometimes. But now I wash my hands all the time. So, I have developed increased awareness in hygiene.” (Focus group nr 4)