Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Research

The mediating role of professional identity between work environment and caring behavior: a cross-sectional survey among hospice nurses in China

verfasst von: Tian-tian Wang, Bo Yang, Yun-rong Li, Liu-liu Zhang, Xiao-xu Zhi, Bing Wu, Yi Zhang, Yun Zhao, Mei-xiang Wang

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Background

As core members of hospice care team, the hospice nurses’ ability to care for patients not only directly affects the standard of patient care, but also significantly impacts patient quality of life. It can be seen that it is very meaningful for patients to improve the caring behavior of hospice nurses. Therefore, it is necessary to deeply explore the influencing factors of nurses’ caring behavior and further clarify the mechanism between them.

Methods

The STROBE guideline was performed to report this study. We conducted a cross-sectional survey from December 2023 to February 2024. In this study, 392 hospice nurses were recruited from tertiary public hospitals in East China by convenient sampling method. Participants were investigated using the Practice Environment Scale, Professional Identity Scale, and Caring Behaviors Inventory. Structural equation modelling was utilized to verify the research hypotheses.

Results

The results revealed that there were significant and positive correlations between work environment, professional identity and caring behavior. Furthermore, professional identity partially mediated the relationship between work environment and caring behavior.

Conclusion

Work environment is critical to improving hospice nurses’ caring behavior. Professional identity plays an intermediary role impacting how work environment promotes caring behavior among Chinese hospice nurses. Nursing managers should have a correct understanding of the relationship between them. Targeted measures and coping strategies need to be actively taken to create a better working environment for hospice nurses. This would enhance professional identity, and thereby promote caring behavior.
Begleitmaterial
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12912-024-02545-0.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background

Hospice care refers to care centered on end-of-life patients and their families, using a multidisciplinary collaborative model to provide physical, psychological, and humanistic care. This holistically involves alleviating their pain and discomfort, improving their quality of life, relieving psychological distress of family members, and helping patients transition with dignity and comfort [1]. Watson, a humanistic care theorist, believes that humanistic care is the essence and core of nursing. Caring behavior is the behavior that nurses actively support and care for patients in nursing practice, and it is the external manifestation of nurses’ professional humanistic care knowledge, attitude and ability[2]. According to the World Health Organization, approximately 56.8 million people worldwide require hospice care each year, but only 14% ultimately receive relevant care [3]. Given the aging population in China, the number of end-of-life patients is gradually increasing, and so is the demand for hospice care services. However, hospice care in China is still at an early stage of development, with a coverage rate of only 10% of the Chinese population [4]. Research has shown that at present, the number and service quality of domestic hospice care practitioners are unable to meet the needs of hospice services [5]. As core members of the hospice care team, the nurses’ ability to care for patients significantly impacts the quality of hospice services [6]. They spend 24-h days with patients, making them invaluable with regard to patient caring behavior [7]. For hospice nurses, a lack of humanistic care in clinical practice may hinder their effective communication with patients, leading to a lack of trust and an increase in conflicts. This will worsen patient clinical outcomes and reduce overall quality of life [8]. Although, some methods and efforts such as, “Healthy China 2030 Plan” [9] have been taken to improve caring services, complaints of dissatisfaction still remain, mainly due to inadequate humanistic care from nurses [10]. Therefore, it is of great importance to explore the factors that affect caring behavior of hospice nurses, in order to provide reference for nursing managers to formulate intervention plans to promote hospice care development in China.
The nursing work environment refers to organizational characteristics of the working environment that promote or prevent professional nursing practices [11]. A good working environment is characterized by harmonious colleague relationships, efficient teams, sufficient staffing, career advancement, and supportive leadership [12]. Multiple studies have suggested that the work environment is an important factor directly impacting hospice practice [13, 14]. The nurse’s caring ability is the core tenet of hospice practice. In a positive environment, nurses are fully engaged with their work and provide comprehensive care to patients [15]. However, in China, work environment problems such as insufficient staffing and resources [16], lead to overworked hospice nurses, who lack the time and energy to care for patients. Although the work environment has been proven to be an important factor influencing caring behavior [17], this relationship is unclear among hospice nurses.
The connotation of nurses’ professional identity is that nurses recognize the value of nursing profession and make corresponding behaviors accordingly[18]. Professional identity is an internal factor to foster career growth, and differences in nurses’ professional identity affect their behavior in clinical work [19]. Previous studies have shown that the higher levels of career satisfaction, were associated with lower turnover intention [20]. Nursing managers can use professional identity as an intrinsic motivation to stabilize nursing teams [21]. Hospice nurses face inevitable work challenges, which may lead to burnout and negative emotions, impacting work efficiency, personal development, and ultimately professional identity [22]. In addition, numerous surveys have demonstrated that professional identity can affect nurses’ caring behavior [23]. Specifically, the higher the nurses’ professional identity, the deeper their understanding of the essence of nursing care. However, few studies have focused on hospice nurses as research subjects, and it is essential to further clarify the relationship between professional identity and caring behavior of hospice nurses.
The field dynamic theory [24] proposed by Kurt Lewin holds that individual behavior is a result of the interaction between internal psychological and external environmental force fields. It is encompassed by the behavior formula; B = f(P*E), where B refers to the behavior, P refers to the individual, and E refers to the environment. Thus, individual behavior can be influenced by two factors: individual psychology (internal psychological factors) and external environment (external environmental factors). Caring behavior may also be explained by this theory, which means that individual caring behavior is affected by both interior psychological factors and exterior environmental factors. In addition, Mehrabianh and Russell’s Stimulus Organism Response (S–O-R) theoretical model [25] emphasizes that in the process from receiving an external stimulus to producing behavioral responses, individuals need to first act on their internal consciousness such as cognition and emotion, in order to produce and generate corresponding responses. In this study, hospice nurses were the subjects of behavioral responses (caring behavior); the effect of external stimuli (working environment) on their behavioral response (caring behavior) needs to be first mediated by internal awareness (professional identity).
Therefore, according to the field dynamics theory, S–O-R model, and previous research, we proposed the following hypotheses and the theoretical model is presented in Fig. 1:
  • Hypothesis 1: Work environment of hospice nurses in China has a positive impact on their caring behavior.
  • Hypothesis 2: Hospice nurses’ professional identity is positively correlated with their caring behavior.
  • Hypothesis 3: Professional identity plays a mediating role between hospice nurses’ work environment and caring behavior.

Methods

Aims

The purpose of this study is to determine how the work environment influences hospice nurses’ caring behavior via professional identity.

Design and sample

This cross-sectional survey was conducted from December 2023 to February 2024. Convenient-sampled method was used to investigate hospice nurses in tertiary public hospitals of East China. The inclusion criteria for the subjects were as follows: (a) owned a professional qualification certificate in China; (b) worked in hospice units for more than one year and practiced in clinical setting independently; (c) at least 18 years old; (d) had the ability to use electronic devices such as phone or computer to complete questionnaire. Participants were excluded if they: (a) took a vocation exceeding 6 months prior to the study; (b) were non-regular employees, such as intern students, training nursing staff, and so forth.

Data collection

Before the study, the project leader contacted the nursing department directors of each hospital to explain the survey objectives, survey subjects, and questionnaire filling methods. After obtaining permission, the electronic questionnaire link was sent to the nursing department directors, who organized nurses meeting the inclusion criteria to fill out the questionnaire. These nurses then filled out the questionnaire anonymously. The questionnaire consisted of informed consent, demographic information and scale entries. Before entering demographic information and scale entries, participants were required to read the informed consent completely and confirm acceptance of investigation. In addition, in order to avoid duplicate filling, the same account was only allowed to fill out questionnaires once. Team members kept track of the questionnaire filling status through the online platform and exported data when no new data was generated for a week. According to Kendell’s sample size estimation method [26], the sample size should be 5–10 times the number of variables. The study was composed of 24 variables. We used 10 times the number of variables and considered a 10% dropout rate, calculating a sample size of 264. Finally, 420 questionnaires were collected. After excluding returned questionnaires with uniform responses for each question, 392 questionnaires were valid, with effective response rate of 93.3%.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Number: 2023-KK054). Participants’ identities were anonymous. Before the investigation, we also obtained the informed consent of the hospice nurses participating in the study. All data were treated in confidence.

Measurements

Practice Environment Scale (PES)

The Practice Environment Scale (PES) was formulated by Lake in 2002 [27]. Then, Wang and Li revised it in the Chinese version in 2011 [28]. The 28-item PES comprises five domains: “nurses participating in hospital affairs” (8 items), “foundation of high-quality nursing services” (9 items), “competence and leadership style of managers” (4 items), “sufficient manpower and material resources” (4 items), and “medical and nursing cooperation” (3 items). The PES is a Likert-4 scale (from 1 refers to “in full disagreement” to 4 refers to “in full agreement”). The higher the score, the better the nursing work environment. The current sample was with a 0.976 Cronbach’s α.

Professional Identity Scale (PIS)

The PIS was originally designed by Liu et al. [29] to measure professional identity of nurses. The PIS consists of 30 items belonging to 5 dimensions, which are “professional cognitive assessment (9 items)”, “professional social support (6 items)”, “professional social skills (6 items)”, “professional frustration reaction (6 items)”, and “professional self-reflection (3 items)”. This scale assessed nurse self-evaluation, using the Likert-5 scoring method, from 1 (completely inconsistent) to 5 (completely consistent). The total score ranged from 30–150 points; 30–60 points indicating a low professional identity; 61–90 points being the lower middle group; 91–120 points standing for medium level; and 121–150 points indicating the highest level group. The Cronbach’s α of PIS was computed 0.989 in the study.

Caring Behaviors Inventory (CBI)

The Caring Behaviors Inventory (CBI) was first designed by Wolf in 1994 [30] and revised by Wu et al. in 2006 [31]. The 24-item CBI this study used is Chinese version, which translated by Da Chaojin [32], including 3 dimensions: support and guarantee (9 items), knowledge and technique ability (5 items), respect and connection (10 items). Participants rated on the scale with 6-point Likert response format, where “1” referred to “never” and “6” referred to “always.” If a participant achieved a higher total score, it indicated that she had better caring behavior. In this study, the Cronbach’s α of CBI was 0.979.

Demographic information

The demographic data of the survey subjects includes: gender, age, education level, marital status, years of work, health status, professional title, job position, monthly income, employment type, and training experience.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted by SPSS 27.0 and Mplus 8.0 in this study. Firstly, the count data used frequency and percentage [n (%)] to characterize, while the measurement data were described by mean and standard deviation [M ± SD]. Then, characteristics that impact nurse caring beahvior were found out by independent-sample t-test or one-way ANOVA. After that, correlation between working environment, professional identity, and caring behavior was achieved through Pearson correlation analysis. After that, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the factor structure of all measurement tools in this study was performed using Mplus 8.0. Finally, the structural equation model was adopted to analyze the relationship between hospice nurses’ working environment, professional identity and caring behavior. The mediation role professional identity played was also verified.
Maximum likeihood (ML) was performed to test the hypothesized model. In addition, we can determine whether the fitting is good by the following parameters: likelihood-ratio chi-square/degree of freedom ratio (χ2/df) ≤ 5.00, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) < 0.08, Tucker Lewis index (TLI) > 0.90, comparative fit index (CFI) > 0.90, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) < 0.08. These parameters can all be obtained in Mplus while constructing structural equation model. In the end, 5000 bootstrap samples and 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals (CI) was adopted to examine the significance of the direct and mediation effects.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics

The data presented in Table 1 showed that the majority of participants were female (99.0%) and married (73.5%). 77.1% of participants were aged less than 40 years, and most reported in excellent or good health (63.1%). In terms of nursing positions and titles, almost two-thirds held primary positions (65.1%), with half holding intermediate titles (47.6%). A minority of participants received a salary exceeding 1200 dollars per month (32.1%) and 77.9% reported receiving humanistic care training.
Table 1
Participant characteristics
Variables
Frequency(percentage)
Caring behavior
Work environment
Professional identity
M ± SD
t/F(p)
M ± SD
t/F(p)
M ± SD
t/F(p)
Gender
  
0.949(0.343)
 
0.655(0.513)
 
0.573(0.567)
 Male
4(1.0%)
115.50 ± 20.69
86.00 ± 11.37
 
117.25 ± 22.97
 
 Female
388(99.0%)
123.00 ± 16.74
90.39 ± 13.34
 
122.67 ± 18.79
 
Age(years)
 
1.993(0.117)
 
0.897(0.466)
 
4.888(0.003)
≤ 25
63(16.3%)
122.67 ± 16.97
 
89.59 ± 11.87
 
123.38 ± 19.05
 
 26–30
56(14.2%)
124.88 ± 16.84
93.43 ± 12.87
 
125.61 ± 18.22
 
 31–40
183(46.6%)
120.96 ± 18.37
89.82 ± 13.82
 
120.25 ± 20.76
 
 41–50
84(21.4%)
125.49 ± 12.26
89.94 ± 13.46
 
124.00 ± 13.54
 
≥ 51
6(1.5%)
130.83 ± 12.12
91.17 ± 14.59
 
139.50 ± 10.04
 
Marital status
  
2.374(0.094)
 
0.015(0.985)
 
0.793(0.453)
 Unmarried
93(23.7%)
121.58 ± 17.68
90.54 ± 13.25
 
121.38 ± 20.39
 
 Married
288(73.5%)
122.95 ± 16.58
90.27 ± 13.03
 
122.78 ± 18.40
 
 Divorce
11(2.8%)
133.18 ± 9.77
90.64 ± 21.12
 
128.73 ± 15.56
 
Monthly income
  
2.809(0.039)
 
4.016(0.008)
 
5.256(0.001)
≤ 3000(US, $400)
12(3.1%)
135.67 ± 9.74
100.33 ± 11.72
 
137.00 ± 16.71
 
 3000–6000(US, $400-$800)
90(22.9%)
120.91 ± 17.84
87.52 ± 13.58
 
118.18 ± 18.66
 
 6000–9000(US, $800-$1200)
164(42%)
122.77 ± 17.53
90.26 ± 12.73
 
121.79 ± 19.53
 
 ≥ 9000(US, $1200)
126(32.1%)
123.33 ± 15.01
91.52 ± 13.32
 
125.48 ± 17.15
 
Health
  
5.228(0.005)
 
6.869(< 0.001)
 
6.972(< 0.001)
 Excellent
69(17.6%)
127.88 ± 15.10
95.10 ± 13.44
 
129.00 ± 17.74
 
 Good
179(45.5%)
124.38 ± 15.47
91.31 ± 12.61
 
124.24 ± 17.23
 
 Average
137(35.1%)
118.69 ± 17.97
86.97 ± 12.87
 
117.37 ± 19.76
 
 Poor
7(1.8%)
119.14 ± 23.36
84.86 ± 21.41
 
120.71 ± 25.51
 
Post
  
4.462(0.013)
 
2.396(0.092)
 
7.281(< 0.001)
 Nurse
255(65.1%)
121.29 ± 18.12
89.75 ± 13.64
 
121.18 ± 19.99
 
 Head nurse
75(19.1%)
125.59 ± 14.74
93.33 ± 11.93
 
128.39 ± 13.00
 
 Responsible group leader
62(15.8%)
126.39 ± 11.81
89.19 ± 13.23
 
121.52 ± 18.66
 
Title
  
3.045(0.031)
 
1.257(0.289)
 
4.590(0.004)
 Nurse
50(13%)
124.84 ± 17.85
91.54 ± 13.50
 
126.28 ± 20.12
 
 Nurse practitioner
92(23.4%)
119.88 ± 17.10
90.01 ± 12.38
 
119.99 ± 18.31
 
 Nurse-in-charge
187(47.6%)
122.61 ± 17.41
89.34 ± 13.78
 
121.13 ± 19.87
 
 Associate senior nurse
63(16%)
126.73 ± 12.32
92.86 ± 13.02
 
127.94 ± 13.38
 
Education
  
1.103(0.333)
 
1.882(0.154)
 
1.810(0.165)
 Junior college
36(9.2%)
126.42 ± 18.58
93.33 ± 14.02
 
127.28 ± 19.81
 
 Undergraduate
345(88%)
122.45 ± 16.65
89.88 ± 13.12
 
121.95 ± 18.64
 
 Postgraduate
11(2.8%)
126.00 ± 13.68
95.27 ± 16.18
 
128.18 ± 19.50
 
Working years in hospice care
 
0.761(0.551)
 
1.442(0.219)
 
0.598(0.664)
 1–3
240(61.3%)
122.07 ± 17.44
 
89.96 ± 12.84
 
122.45 ± 19.45
 
 4–6
77(19.6%)
124.90 ± 14.91
 
92.12 ± 12.74
 
125.27 ± 16.61
 
 7–10
36(9.2)
125.81 ± 15.55
 
90.78 ± 13.88
 
122.22 ± 20.41
 
 11–15
26(6.6%)
121.19 ± 17.58
 
91.69 ± 15.92
 
122.77 ± 17.87
 
 ≥ 15
13(3.3%)
122.31 ± 16.69
 
83.08 ± 17.19
 
118.54 ± 17.24
 
Employment type
  
0.620(0.544)
 
0.251(0.778)
 
0.891(0.411)
 Contract
254(64.9%)
122.59 ± 17.48
90.35 ± 13.44
 
121.69 ± 19.87
 
 Personnel agency
13(3.3%)
118.92 ± 19.29
87.85 ± 13.05
 
123.62 ± 17.85
 
 Formal preparation
125(31.8%)
123.99 ± 14.97
90.60 ± 13.18
 
124.40 ± 16.55
 
Experience of training
  
2.765(0.006)
 
2.722(0.007)
 
2.412(0.017)
 Yes
306(77.9%)
124.15 ± 16.03
91.31 ± 13.13
 
123.96 ± 17.75
 
 No
86(22.1%)
118.53 ± 18.63
86.92 ± 13.50
 
117.83 ± 21.63
 

Scores of scales with dimensions

The scores from Table 2 expressed that the total caring behavior among hospice nurses was 122.9 (SD = 16.8, range: 24–144), with support and guarantee, knowledge and technique ability, respect and connection presented as 47.5 (SD = 6.4, range: 9–54), 26.1 (SD = 3.7, range: 5–30), and 49.4 (SD = 8.2, range: 10–60), respectively. Additionally, the hospice nurses tended to have high levels of professional identity (M = 122.6, SD = 18.8, range: 30–150) and a better working environment (M = 90.3, SD = 13.3, range: 28–112).
Table 2
Scores of scales with dimensions
Scale/Subscale
Mean
SD
Range
1. Caring behavior
122.9
16.8
24–144
1.1 Support and guarantee
47.5
6.4
9–54
1.2 Knowledge and skills
26.1
3.7
5–30
1.3 Respect and connection
49.4
8.2
10–60
2. Work environment
90.3
13.3
28–112
3. Professional identity
122.6
18.8
30–150

Bivariate analysis

As shown in Table 1, caring behavior differed significantly with regard to monthly income (F = 2.809, p = 0.039), health (F = 5.228, p = 0.005), post (F = 4.462, p = 0.013), title (F = 3.045, p = 0.031) and experience of training or not (t = 2.765, p = 0.006). According to post hoc analysis, hospice nurses with higher monthly incomes, better health, higher posts and titles, and training experience in hospice care tended to have higher levels of caring behavior.

Correlation analysis

Before Pearson correlation analyses, the normality of data has been tested. The result showed that the skewness value ≤ 2 and the kurtosis value ≤ 4, which suggested that the normal distribution of data is met. Correlation analysis using Pearson’s correlation indicated significant positive association among nurse working environment, professional identity, the total score of caring behavior and its three dimensions. Table 3 showed the details.
Table 3
Correlations among work environment, professional identity and caring behavior
Variables
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Work environment
1
     
2. Professional identity
0.757**
1
    
3. Caring behavior
0.642**
0.666**
1
   
4. Support and assurance
0.501**
0.505**
0.845**
1
  
5. Knowledge and skills
0.576**
0.576**
0.932**
0.775**
1
 
6. Respect and connection
0.635**
0.683**
0.934**
0.671**
0.774**
1
**p < 0.01

Measurement model and structural model

Before the mediation model test, multiple collinear tests were conducted to ensure no multicollinearity was present based on variance inflation factors (VIF) ranging from 1.023 to 3.841. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then performed by Mplus 8.0 to measure validity of the model under the maximum likelihood methods. The standardized factor loading for caring behavior three dimensions was 0.82 ~ 0.91. In addition, working environment and professional identity, which were both constructed by five dimensions, had the standardized factor loading of 0.85 ~ 0.95 and 0.88 ~ 0.93, respectively. They were all greater than 0.5 and thus, able to be retained in the model. Fit indices were as follows: χ2/df = 3.06, SRMR = 0.037, CFI = 0.978, TLI = 0.972, RMSEA = 0.073, which were all within a reasonable range.
Mediation effects was verified by 5000 bootstrap samples. As shown in Table 4, working environment held the direct effect of β = 0.335(p < 0.001) on caring behavior. Moreover, results also showed direct effects between working environment on professional identity(β = 0.777, p < 0.001), professional identity on caring behavior(β = 0.436, p < 0.001). As a result, the indirect effect of working environment → Professional identity → Caring behavior, accounting for 50.3% of the total effect was represented by β = 0.339 (p < 0.001). These results shows that professional identity partially mediated the relationship between the working environment and caring behavior. More details has been presented in Fig. 2.
Table 4
direct and Indirect effects between work environment and caring behavior
Path
Effect
Boot SE
t
p
Boot LLCI
Boot UCLI
Work environment → Professional identity
0.777
0.025
31.08
 < 0.001
0.724
0.822
Professional identity → Caring behavior
0.436
0.077
5.66
 < 0.001
0.286
0.584
Indirect effect
0.339
0.055
6.16
 < 0.001
0.172
0.345
Direct effect
0.335
0.068
4.92
 < 0.001
0.195
0.461

Discussion

First, our results showed that the caring behavior of hospice nurses was at a high level, slightly higher than other research reports [33]. In 2022, the National Health Commission released the “National Nursing Development Plan(2021–2025)”, one of the main tasks of which is to “promote the high-quality development of nursing and strengthen the humanistic care ability of nurses”. In addition, the policy also calls for accelerating the development of hospice care and training professionals engaged in hospice care services[34]. With the support of this policy, China Life Care Association actively organized humanistic care training for nurses, so that they have a deeper understanding of humanistic care[35]. A study on the humanistic care ability of Chinese healthcare workers showed that humanistic care training is the main influencing factor of nurses’ humanistic care ability[36]. In this study, 77.9% of hospice nurses participated in nursing humanistic care training, such as humanistic care case analysis and scenario simulation training, indicating that actively conducting training aids in improving nursing care. Interestingly, almost all participants in this survey (99%) were women suggesting that gender may significantly impact nursing behavior [37]. Furthermore, the level of care provided by responsible group leaders and associate senior nurses was higher, consistent with the research findings of Patiraki et al. [38]. When compared to younger nurses, senior staff tend to work longer, are more clinically experienced, and have a strong awareness of caring for patients. Therefore, it is suggested that nursing managers regularly organize senior nurses to share their experience of implementing humanistic care with younger nurses, so as to improve the level of humanistic care among young nurses. Besides, we also found that health condition significantly influenced caring behavior of hospice nurses. Nurses with excellent and good health were more likely to achieve the expected work performance [39]. Thus, there is a need for preventive interventions that focus on identifying or improving the physical and mental health of hospice nurses in order to enhance their caring behavior. On the one hand, nursing managers should attach importance to the construction of departmental sports culture, such as establishing activity rooms, which can not only promote physical activity but also create a harmonious working atmosphere. On the other hand, it is necessary to actively carry out group psychological counseling to help nurses learn emotional management skills, in order to strengthen the construction of positive psychological resources. Moreover, hospice nurses who earned more than 1,200 dollars a month had a higher level of care in our survey. However, these individuals only accounted for 32.1% of participants. Hospital administrators should establish a suitable salary system to ensure that hospice nurses’ welfare benefits are reasonable and fair, thereby promoting their care for patients.
Second, our results revealed that work environment has a direct and positive effect on hospice nurses’ caring behavior, which supports Hypothesis 1. To some extent, we can draw a conclusion that hospice nurses in a positive work environment are more willing to care for patients, corresponding with previous study by Norkaih et al.[17]. A healthy work environment helps hospice nurses access resources, which make them feel valued and supported by their leaders. This increases both their commitment to the organization and job satisfaction [40]. They then feel a strong sense of duty to the organization, promoting provision of high-quality care to patients [41]. Empirical evidence also suggested that a healthy working environment reduce worn out and profit for caring behavior, which were crucial to accomplish patient-centered care and efficient teamwork in hospices [42]. Therefore, creating a supportive nursing work environment is essential. Hospital managers can encourage hospice nurses to participate in organizational decision-making, provide clear organizational goals and career blueprints, and allocate resources reasonably [43]. Meanwhile, the empowering leadership of head nurses help to motivate junior nurses to work autonomously [44]. In addition, harmonious cooperation between doctors and nurses is very important, which fosters reciprocal feelings of trust and respect [45, 46].
Furthermore, the findings provided evidence that hospice nurses’ professional identity was positively associated with their caring behavior, supporting Hypothesis 2, which is consistent with a previous study on the relationship between professional identity and caring behavior of nurse leaders[2]. Wu et al. discovered that nurses possessing a strong sense of professional identity have greater work enthusiasm and engagement[18]. According to the field dynamics theory [24], individual internal factors such as cognition and attitude affect one’s behavior. When nurses recognize the value of their profession and derive a sense of happiness from it, they associate positive experiences and emotions with their work. This will promote an intrinsic motivation to actively engage in work, thereby changing caring behavior [47]. Not only that, professional identity can also increase psychological maturity of hospice nurses, enabling them to accept adverse phenomena in the profession with a calm outlook. They can then understand the special and psychological vulnerability of end-of-life patients, and actively integrate humanistic care into practice [48]. In summary, nursing managers should attach importance to the positive psychological construction of hospice nurses, help them establish professional resilience, and combine effective protection and incentive measures to enhance their professional identity.
Finally, professional identity is a mediator between work environment and hospice nurses’ caring behavior. Our results were consistent with the aforementioned hypothesis 3. Qi et al. highlighted that nurses had doubts about their professional perception within a non-supportive environment [49]. The lower the level of professional identity, the more likely nurses hold indifferent attitudes towards their work. They may view nursing as low-level cheap labor, which affects their caring behavior [50]. On the contrary, when nurses work in a positive environment, they are more likely to identify with their profession and increase their willingness to stay on the job [51]. Moreover, nurses with positive professional identity are more focused on their work and provide better patient care [47]. Therefore, nursing managers should pay attention to the interrelationship between the working environment of hospice nurses and their professional identity and caring behavior. They not only need to optimize the nursing working environment, but also intervene in the caring behavior of hospice nurses from the perspective of professional identity. Furthermore, the results of this study suggested that hospice nurses’ professional identity plays a partial mediating role between work environment and caring behavior, indicating that in addition to professional identity, there may be other variables that have a mediating effect between work environment and caring behavior, and the mechanisms of action still need to be further explored in the future.
Our research provides relevant implications for nursing management. By exploring the caring behavior of hospice nurses, a specialized group, we find that their working environment is positively correlated with caring behavior. Meanwhile, professional identity plays a mediating role between work environment and caring behavior. It suggests that hospital managers should attach importance to the construction of a healthy work environment as the long-term goal of organizational development. Proactive intervention measures should be taken to improve the working environment for hospice nurses, such as establishing a fair salary system, conducting end-of-life care training, and providing promotion opportunities. Furthermore, nursing managers should pay attention not only to hospice nurses’ work environment but also their professional identity. Nursing managers can organize Balint group activities and provide professional awareness training for hospice nurses to enhance their professional identity and thus promote their level of care.

Conclusion

In this study, we identified a significant relationship between work environment and caring behavior in hospice nurses, as well as the mediating influence of professional identity on this relationship. Nursing managers are supposed to have a correct understanding of relationship between the three variables, and then take targeted measures and coping strategies to improve hospice nurses’ work environments and enhance professional identity, so as to promote their caring behavior.

Limitations

The study has several limitations. First, the cross-sectional design prevents establishing causal relationships between variables. Second, the limited sample size curtails the generalizability of our findings. Hence, large-scale longitudinal studies for hospice nurses can be considered in the future. Third, this study focuses on hospice nurses in some regions of China, which may have a certain impact on the external applicability of the result. Fourth, all data in this study were based on self-reporting, which increases the possibility of source bias. In the future, it is necessary to objectively measure the caring behavior of hospice nurses from the perspective of patients. Finally, the study investigated only professional identity of hospice nurses as a mediator between their work environment and caring behavior. Other mediators such as (psychological capital, job burnout, and emotional intelligence) should be explored in future studies.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their appreciation to all nurse managers of hospitals who assisted in our investigation process. Additionally, we are sincerely grateful to the hospice nurses participated in this study.

Declarations

The research involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital. All procedures were conducted in compliance with local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was obtained from the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.
Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Anhänge

Supplementary Information

Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao W, Guo C, Yang J, Zhou Z, Ji G, Cheng W. Research Progress on Hospice Care Practices. Medicine and Philosophy. 2024;45:32–7. Zhao W, Guo C, Yang J, Zhou Z, Ji G, Cheng W. Research Progress on Hospice Care Practices. Medicine and Philosophy. 2024;45:32–7.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen A, Wang Y, Qiang W. A Multicenter Investigation of Caring Behaviors and Burnout Among Oncology Nurses in China. Cancer Nurs. 2020:43. Shen A, Wang Y, Qiang W. A Multicenter Investigation of Caring Behaviors and Burnout Among Oncology Nurses in China. Cancer Nurs. 2020:43.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhong X, Liu X, Sheng Y. The effect of the humanistic care teaching model on nurse patient conflict and nurse turnover intention in a pediatric outpatient department: results of a randomized trial. Translational Pediatrics. 2021;10:2016–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhong X, Liu X, Sheng Y. The effect of the humanistic care teaching model on nurse patient conflict and nurse turnover intention in a pediatric outpatient department: results of a randomized trial. Translational Pediatrics. 2021;10:2016–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong X, He R, Gao M. Association between nursing work environment and compassion satisfaction among clinical nurses. Chinese Nursing Management. 2021;21:975–9. Dong X, He R, Gao M. Association between nursing work environment and compassion satisfaction among clinical nurses. Chinese Nursing Management. 2021;21:975–9.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Higashibata T, Hamano J, Nagaoka H, Sasahara T, Fukumori T, Arahata T, Kazama I, Maeno T, Kizawa Y. Work environmental factors associated with compassion satisfaction and end-of-life care quality among nurses in general wards, palliative care units, and home care settings: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023;143:104521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104521.CrossRefPubMed Higashibata T, Hamano J, Nagaoka H, Sasahara T, Fukumori T, Arahata T, Kazama I, Maeno T, Kizawa Y. Work environmental factors associated with compassion satisfaction and end-of-life care quality among nurses in general wards, palliative care units, and home care settings: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023;143:104521. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ijnurstu.​2023.​104521.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarafis, P.; Rousaki, E.; Tsounis, A.; Malliarou, M.; Lahana, E.; Bamidis, P.; Niakas, D.; Papastavrou, E. The impact of occupational stress on nurses' caring behaviors and their health related quality of life. BMC Nurs 2016, 15.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0178-y. Sarafis, P.; Rousaki, E.; Tsounis, A.; Malliarou, M.; Lahana, E.; Bamidis, P.; Niakas, D.; Papastavrou, E. The impact of occupational stress on nurses' caring behaviors and their health related quality of life. BMC Nurs 2016, 15.https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12912-016-0178-y.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat National Nursing Development Plan(2021–2025). Chinese Nursing Management 2022,22,06,801–804. National Nursing Development Plan(2021–2025). Chinese Nursing Management 2022,22,06,801–804.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Patiraki E, Karlou C, Efstathiou G, Tsangari H, Merkouris A, Jarosova D, Leino-Kilpi H, Suhonen R, Balogh Z, Palese A, et al. The Relationship Between Surgical Patients and Nurses Characteristics With Their Perceptions of Caring Behaviors: A European Survey. Clin Nurs Res. 2012;23:132–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773812468447.CrossRefPubMed Patiraki E, Karlou C, Efstathiou G, Tsangari H, Merkouris A, Jarosova D, Leino-Kilpi H, Suhonen R, Balogh Z, Palese A, et al. The Relationship Between Surgical Patients and Nurses Characteristics With Their Perceptions of Caring Behaviors: A European Survey. Clin Nurs Res. 2012;23:132–52. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1054773812468447​.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Simonetti, M.; Aiken, L.; Lake, E. Association between the nurse work environment and patient experience in Chilean hospitals: A multi-hospital cross-sectional study. Journal of nursing scholarship: an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing 2023, 55, 1248–1257.https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12898. Simonetti, M.; Aiken, L.; Lake, E. Association between the nurse work environment and patient experience in Chilean hospitals: A multi-hospital cross-sectional study. Journal of nursing scholarship: an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing 2023, 55, 1248–1257.https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jnu.​12898.
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim, M.; Oh, Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, E. Job satisfaction and moral distress of nurses working as physician assistants: focusing on moderating role of moral distress in effects of professional identity and work environment on job satisfaction. BMC Nurs 2023, 22, 267.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01427-1. Kim, M.; Oh, Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, E. Job satisfaction and moral distress of nurses working as physician assistants: focusing on moderating role of moral distress in effects of professional identity and work environment on job satisfaction. BMC Nurs 2023, 22, 267.https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12912-023-01427-1.
Metadaten
Titel
The mediating role of professional identity between work environment and caring behavior: a cross-sectional survey among hospice nurses in China
verfasst von
Tian-tian Wang
Bo Yang
Yun-rong Li
Liu-liu Zhang
Xiao-xu Zhi
Bing Wu
Yi Zhang
Yun Zhao
Mei-xiang Wang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02545-0