Background
Methods
Design and sample
Procedures
The NEECHAM confusion scale
Statistical analysis
Results
Reliability
Alpha if item Deleted | Correct Item- total Correlation | |
---|---|---|
Attention | .8644 | .8392 |
Processing commands | .8815 | .8346 |
Orientation | .8698 | .8361 |
Appearance | .6821 | .8627 |
Motor | .8235 | .8425 |
Verbal | .7948 | .8456 |
Vital function | .1158 | .8983 |
Oxygen sat. | .1956 | .8887 |
Continence. | .2444 | .8888 |
Items Continence function | Attention | Processing Commands | Orientation | Appearance | Motor | Verbal | Vital funct. | Oxygen Sat. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attention | 1.0000 | ||||||||
Processing commands | .9007 | 1.0000 | |||||||
Orientation | .8665 | .8954 | 1.0000 | ||||||
Appearance | .6465 | .6646 | .6613 | 1.0000 | |||||
Motor | .8353 | .8615 | .8133 | .6150 | 1.0000 | ||||
Verbal | .7412 | .7943 | .7899 | .6174 | .7416 | 1.0000 | |||
Vital function | .0618 | .0479 | .0506 | .0461 | .0363 | .0504 | 1.0000 | ||
Oxygen sat. | .0900 | .1077 | .1365 | .1365 | .0685 | .1679 | .2720 | 1.0000 | |
Continence | .1741 | .1282 | .1698 | .1698 | .1604 | .1741 | .3190 | .2989 | 1,000 |
Construct validity
NEECHAM Item Communality | Component 1 | Component 2 | |
---|---|---|---|
Attention | 0.930 | 6.313E-02 | 0.868 |
Processing commands | 0.955 | 4.131E-02 | 0.913 |
Orientation | 0.935 | 8.002E-02 | 0.880 |
Appearance | 0.762 | 0.121 | 0.596 |
Motor | 0.909 | 3.392E-02 | 0.827 |
Verbal | 0.864 | 0.110 | 0.759 |
Vital function | -1.715E-02 | 0.738 | 0.545 |
Oxygen saturation | 7.478E-2 | 0.707 | 0.506 |
Urine continence | 0.134 | 0.731 | 0.553 |
Eigenvalue | 4.912 | 1.534 | |
% explanatory var. | 54.573 | 17.048 |
Concurrent validity
Sensitivity [(35/36) × 100] | 97.2% |
---|---|
Specificity [(72/87) × 100] | 82.8% |
Predicted value for positive test [(35/50) × 100] | 70.0% |
Predicted value for negative test [(72/73) × 100] | 98.6% |
Precision [(35+72/35+15+1+72) × 100] | 86.9% |
User-friendliness
Questions and statements * | Mean ratings |
---|---|
How much time did you need to rate the NEECHAM confusion scale? (in minutes) | 3.69 (1.21) |
All observational data were collected during regular bedside care | 4.08 (1.21) |
Collection of data for rating the NEECHAM confusion scale did not ask specific effort of the patient | 3.53 (1.32) |
I can assess the patient for all items of the NEECHAM confusion scale | 3.33 (1.37) |
I can assess intubated ICU patients for all items of the NEECHAM confusion scale | 2.11 (0.89) |
I can assess ICU patients with a level of awareness comparable with an EMV score of 3 - 5- 3 or higher for all items of the NEECHAM confusion scale | 3.42 (0.81) |
Item 1 of the NEECHAM confusion scale is clearly formulated | 4.06 (0.58) |
Item 2 of the NEECHAM confusion scale is clearly formulated | 4.08 (0.50) |
Item 3 of the NEECHAM confusion scale is clearly formulated | 4.00 (0.68) |
Item 4 of the NEECHAM confusion scale is clearly formulated | 3.78 (0.90) |
Item 5 of the NEECHAM confusion scale is clearly formulated | 3.92 (0.69) |
Item 6 of the NEECHAM confusion scale is clearly formulated | 3.97 (0.81) |
Item 7 of the NEECHAM confusion scale is clearly formulated | 4.22 (0.48) |
Item 8 of the NEECHAM confusion scale is clearly formulated | 4.22 (0.48) |
Item 9 of the NEECHAM confusion scale is clearly formulated | 4.19 (0.58) |
With the instructions, one can rate the NEECHAM confusion scale | 4.14 (0.42) |
The language used in the NEECHAM confusion scale is appropriate | 3.69 (1.06) |
All the items in the NEECHAM confusion scale are relevant for the ICU patient | 3.42 (1.05) |