Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Research

Nurses’ self-care levels and its related factors: a cross-sectional study

verfasst von: Yunlian Kong, Zirong Tong, Longxiu Liu

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Background

Nurses’ self-care has been reported to enhance nurses’ mental health and the quality of care they provide to patients. However, there is a scarcity of studies exploring the factors that influence nurses’ self-care. Consequently, this study aims to investigate the current status of nurses’ self-care ability and its influencing factors, thereby providing a reference for formulating effective strategies to improve nurses’ self-care.

Methods

This study is a cross-sectional study employing convenience sampling. A general information questionnaire, nurses’ self-care scale, and the flourishing scale were used to explore nurses’ self-care ability and the influencing factors among 1,046 nurses from eight tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province, China.

Results

The total score of nurses’ self-care was (144.63 ± 22.53).The scores for the dimensions of self-care awareness, self-care knowledge, healthy lifestyle, occupational self-acceptance, and inner self-fulfillment were (23.43 ± 4.68), (19.40 ± 4.15), (22.08 ± 4.99), (43.82 ± 5.61), and (35.91 ± 6.00), respectively. The total score of nurses’ flourishing was (45.45 ± 8.83). The self-care scores of nurses with different ages, professional titles, positions, years of working experience, night shift frequency, marital status, number of children, sleep quality, frequency of physical exercise, experience of workplace violence, experience of psychological help-seeking, mental health promotion training experience, relationship with family members, relationship with coworkers, experience of career change, and the flourishing grading level were statistically significantly different(P<0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the influencing factors of nurses’ self-care competence were sleep quality, relationships with colleagues, and the flourishing grading level(P<0.05).

Conclusion

It is essential to improve nurses’ self-care ability. Sleep quality, relationship with coworkers, and the flourishing grading level are the factors that influence nurses’ self-care ability.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.
Hinweise

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background/Introduction

Self-care, also known as self-compassion, pertains to individuals’ concern and love for themselves and their occupations [13]. According to American nursing theorist Watson [4] and the American Holistic Nurses Association [5], self-care involves balancing positive and negative factors in life to attain harmony in one’s physical, mental, emotional, and interpersonal relationships. It represents a positive and healthy attitude and behavior [6].
Nurses’ self-care refers to the care and love that they have for themselves and their nursing careers [3]. Self-care has been demonstrated to enhance self-support, alleviate stress and burnout, reduce empathy fatigue [79], enhance job satisfaction, and promote mental health and emotional well being [10]. Self-care is also a prerequisite for caring for others [11], influencing nurses’ career development [3]. It is reported that the higher a nurse’s level of self-care, the greater their empathy and the better care they can provide [10]. By taking care of themselves and meeting their personal needs, nurses can better care for the patients. The American Nurses Association (ANA) has defined self-care as a responsibility for nurses [12]. According to the ANA, not caring for self can result in performance deficits, increasing risk of errors, etc [13]. Nursing healthcare is characterized by high emotional effort, high professional requirements, high risk, high intensity, heavy workload, and long working hours. Nurses are faced with multiple stressors in daily work, which affect nurses’ physical and mental health and work efficiency in the long term [1417]. This requires nurses to be strong in body, mind, and spirit. Consequently, nurses need to prioritize self-care.
However, in the clinical setting, nurses often prioritize patient care and neglect self-care for various reasons, such as a lack of knowledge about self-care [18, 19], lack of time, heavy workload, lack of resources or facilities, etc [20]. The support system for nurses’ self-care is poor, clinical managers tend to pay little attention to nurses’ self-care [20]. Investigating nurses’ self-care abilities and the factors influencing them can assist managers in taking targeted measures to enhance nurses’ self-care. Although there is existing research on nurses’ ability to care for patients and its influencing factors, there is a dearth of research on nurses’ self-care and related factors. Moreover, many studies focus on nurses’ psychological problems, such as depression and anxiety and other negative psychological factors, and lack of exploration from the perspective of positive psychology, such as self-care.
Positive psychology encompasses the study of positive emotions, positive character traits, and facilitating institutions [21]. It stresses the potential power of human strengths on human mental health and well-being [6]. The most crucial mission within positive psychology might be to comprehend and promote the human flourishing [21], which is an optimal psychological well-being state characterized by positive emotions, engagement, positive relationships, meaning, and accomplishment [22]. It has been reported that self-care is a significant to enhance flourishing [23], whether flourishing promotes self-care remains unclear.
Therefore, this cross-sectional study was conducted within the framework of positive psychology. It aims to (1) investigate the current self-care status of clinical nurses in China using the Nurses’ Self-Care Scale, and (2) identify the factors that affect nurses’ self-care, such as flourishing. This research will provide valuable insights for implementing effective interventions to improve nurses’ self-care.

Method

Design and aim

In this study, a cross-sectional design was employed. The aim was to explore nurses’ self-care and the factors that influence it. The study was conducted under the guidance of the “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology” STROBE checklist.

Setting and participants

The study was conducted in eight tertiary comprehensive hospitals located in six cities of Jiangsu province, China. A convenience sampling method was adopted to select eight tertiary hospitals from all the tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province and nurses who met the inclusion criteria from included hospitals. The inclusion criteria of participants were as follows: ① certificated clinical nurses, ② working in clinical departments for more than 12 months, ③ being informed and giving consent to participate in this study, and being able to independently complete the questionnaire. The exclusion criteria were: ① further training personnel from other hospitals and rotation personnel, ② those working in the outpatient clinics and other non-clinical workers; ③ those on maternity leave, sick leave, and other absences for more than 1 month. The study sample size was calculated according to Kendall’s sample estimation principle: N = independent variables× (5–10). There are 27 independent variables included in this study, including 26 variables sourced from the demographic information and 1 variable from the flourishing scale. Multiplying this by 10, taking into account a 20% invalid questionnaire rate, the final sample size is determined to be 338.

Data collecting and quality control

Data were collected from December 2023 to April 2024. The questionnaire was transformed into an online version using the Wenjuanxing software, an online questionnaire editing system (https://​www.​wjx.​cn/​), and a questionnaire QR code was generated. A unified instruction was attached to the questionnaire to explain the objective and principle of the survey. The participants were informed that the study adhered to the principles of confidentiality and voluntariness. All the data collected would be used solely for this study. They could participate voluntarily and withdraw from the study at any time. All the participants consented to participate in this study. Each item was set as a compulsory question, and each WeChat account could only submit once.
After undergoing uniform training, the research team members contacted the nurse managers of the targeted departments from the included hospitals to obtain permission for the survey. The nurses who met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study would receive the QR code of the questionnaire from the nurse manager and complete it independently within the required time. The questionnaire was only distributed to the nurses who were available at the time of data collection. All participants completed the questionnaires in a quiet environment (the nurse duty room in the ward). The survey was conducted anonymously.

Instruments

Demographic characteristics questionnaire

The demographic characteristics questionnaire was designed by the research team through literature review and group discussion. After expert consultation and a pilot survey, 26 items were included in the questionnaire, such as gender, age, educational level, professional title, professional position, department, employment mode, years of work, number of night shifts per month, average monthly income, marital status, number of children raised, being born in an only child family, residential status, religious belief, sleep quality, frequency of physical exercise per week, experience of workplace violence, experience of seeking professional psychological help, reading psychological books, experience of mental health promotion training within a year, relationship with family members, experience of a significant other’s death within a year, relationship with colleagues, major experience of major career changes within a year.

Nurses’ self-care scale

The Self-Care scale employed in this study was particularly designed by a domestic scholar to measure nurses’ self-care ability [1]. It was developed from the perspective of positive psychology and took nurses’ occupational characteristics into consideration. The scale comprises five subscales: ① the emergence of self-care awareness (items 1–6); ② the mastery of self-care knowledge (items 7–11); ③ the implementation of a healthy lifestyle (items 12–17); ④ occupational self-acceptance (items 18–27); and ⑤ the inner self-fulfillment (items 28–36). Responses to each item were provided on a 5-point Likert scale (never = 1, always = 5). All items were scored in a positive direction. The total scale score ranges from 36 to 180, with higher scores indicating higher levels of nurses’ self-care. The scoring standard for each subscale is the same as that for the total score. The Cronbach’s α for the total scale is 0.977, and the Cronbach’s α for the subscales range from 0.890 to 0.975 [1]. The author has permitted the use of the Nurses’ Self-Care Scale in this study.

The flouring scale (FS)

This study adopted the flourishing scale developed by Diener et al. [24]. In total, there are eight items on the scale, which are: “1. I lead a purposeful and meaningful life”, “2. My social relationships are supportive and rewarding”, “3. I am engaged and interested in my daily activities”, 4. I actively contribute to the happiness and well-being of others”, “5. I am competent in the activities that are important to me”, “6. I am a good person and live a good life”,” 7. I am optimistic about my future”, and “8. People respect me”. Each item of the Flourishing Scale is answered on a 7-point Likert scale (strongly disagree = 1, 7 strongly agree = 7). All items were scored positively. The total score ranges from 8 to 56. Higher scores indicate that respondents view themselves more positively in important areas of functioning. The domestic researcher Lai Qiao-Zhen [25] translated it into the Chinese version through the Brislin model.The internal consistency reliability of the flourishing scale is 0.948, the split-half reliability is 0.917, and the retest reliability after three weeks is 0.819 [25].
Moreover, Lai Qiao-Zhen [25] graded the flourishing level according to the mean score. According to her grading rule, the mean score ≥ 6 means a very high level of flourishing, indicating that the individual has great psycho-social functioning. A mean score of 5 ~ < 6 is a high level of flourishing, representing good psycho-social functioning. The mean score of 4 ~ < 5 equals a medium level of flourishing, indicating average psycho-social functioning. When the mean score is < 4, it represents a low level of flourishing and a poor psycho-social functioning.

Data analysis

SPSS version 28.0 was employed for statistical analysis in this study. Ordinal and categorized variables were described in terms of frequency and percentage. For continuous variables following a normal distribution, the means and standard deviations were used. The independent-sample t-test was conducted to determine if there was a significant difference in nurses’ self-care scores between the two groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was utilized to analyze the differences in self-care scores among multiple groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to analyze the influencing factors of nurses’ self-care. Statistical significance for all results was considered when the two-tailed p-value was <0.05.

Results

Demographic characteristics of the participants

A total of 1098 questionnaires were distributed and returned, with a return rate of 100%. Among them, 52 questionnaires were considered invalid because the same option was selected continuously. Therefore, 1046 questionnaires were valid and the valid recovery rate is 95.26%. The characteristics of the participants and the relationship of nurses’ self-care scores with demographic variables and nurses’ flourishing levels are presented in Table 1. A total of 1046 nurses were included in this study. Most of the participants were female (95.8%). The age group of 20–40 years old was predominant among the nurses, accounting for 81.9%. A bachelor’s degree was the main educational level (92.9%). Among the participants, the primary, intermediate, and senior professional titles accounted for 56.8%, 33.4%, and 9.8%, respectively. The majority were general nurses (74.4%). Most of them had worked for 6–15 years.
Table 1
Demographic characteristics and univariate analysis of self-care in clinical nurses (N = 1046)
Variables
n
percentage(%)
 
Self-Care
 
t/F
Mean ± SD
P
Employment mode
     
In-establishment
119
11.4
2.262
149.03 ± 20.67
0.024
Off-establishment
927
88.6
 
144.07 ± 22.71
 
Gender
     
Male
44
4.2
-1.848
138.50 ± 22.61
0.065
Female
1002
95.8
 
144.90 ± 22.50
 
Age
     
20–30
398
38.0
5.194
141.40 ± 22.58
0.001
31–40
459
43.9
 
146.12 ± 22.61
 
41–50
156
14.9
 
146.97 ± 21.43
 
≥ 51
33
3.2
 
152.00 ± 21.53
 
Educational level
     
Diploma Level
51
4.9
0.071
143.65 ± 26.47
0.931
Undergraduate level
972
92.9
 
144.66 ± 22.39
 
Postgraduate level and above
23
2.2
 
145.61 ± 19.59
 
Professional title
     
Junior
594
56.8
3.966
143.08 ± 22.61
0.019
Medium
349
33.4
 
146.00 ± 23.20
 
Senior
103
9.8
 
148.96 ± 18.78
 
Professional position
     
General duty nurse
778
74.4
2.495
143.60 ± 23.35
0.059
Group leader
193
18.5
 
146.77 ± 20.65
 
Nurse manager
70
6.7
 
149.60 ± 16.76
 
Nurse director
5
0.4
 
153.00 ± 21.35
 
Years of working
     
≤ 5 years
143
13.7
3.780
140.14 ± 21.59
0.010
6–15 years
613
58.6
 
144.82 ± 22.91
 
16–25 years
216
20.7
 
145.00 ± 22.56
 
>25 years
74
7.1
 
150.76 ± 19.52
 
Number of night shifts per month
     
0
177
16.9
6.102
149.07 ± 20.59
0.000
1–4
453
43.3
 
146.18 ± 21.63
 
5–8
298
28.5
 
142.52 ± 24.61
 
9–12
100
9.6
 
137.09 ± 19.64
 
>12
18
1.7
 
136.40 ± 28.85
 
Average monthly income
     
>6000
47
4.5
1.172
142.02 ± 24.79
0.310
6000–8000
411
39.3
 
143.65 ± 24.06
 
>8000
588
56.2
 
145.53 ± 21.19
 
Marital status
     
Married
734
70.2
8.544
146.42 ± 22.10
0.000
Unmarried
293
28
 
139.92 ± 22.99
 
Divorced
19
1.8
 
150.63 ± 22.48
 
Number of children raised
     
0
413
39.5
11.151
142.68 ± 22.51
0.001
1
505
48.3
 
147.88 ± 22.13
 
≥ 2
128
12.2
 
152.25 ± 23.13
 
Being born in only child family
     
Yes
498
47.6
0.623
145.09 ± 23.33
0.533
No
548
52.4
 
144.22 ± 21.79
 
Residential status
     
Local resident
624
59.7
1.722
145.62 ± 22.16
0.085
Non-local resident
422
40.3
 
143.18 ± 23.02
 
Religious belief
     
Yes
47
4.5
-0.330
143.57 ± 26.31
0.741
No
999
95.5
 
144.68 ± 22.35
 
Quality of sleep
     
Very poor
76
7.3
23.780
132.55 ± 26.18
0.001
Poor
206
19.7
 
135.49 ± 24.93
 
Average
574
54.9
 
145.70 ± 21.25
 
Good
166
15.9
 
153.13 ± 18.80
 
Very good
24
2.3
 
153.13 ± 18.80
 
Physical exercise frequency per week
     
≥ 7
5
0.5
4.955
163.00 ± 18.47
0.002
4–6
29
2.8
 
145.28 ± 22.05
 
2–3
216
20.7
 
149.10 ± 20.71
 
≤ 1
796
76.1
 
144.41 ± 22.85
 
Experience of workplace violence
     
Yes
310
29.6
-5.694
138.61 ± 21.61
0.001
No
736
70.4
 
147.17 ± 22.44
 
Professional psychological help-seeking
     
Yes
75
7.2
-2.494
138.40 ± 23.23
0.013
No
971
92.8
 
145.12 ± 22.42
 
Reading psychological book
     
Never
435
41.6
0.877
143.64 ± 23.35
0.452
Seldom
484
46.3
 
144.87 ± 21.91
 
Sometimes
108
10.3
 
147.48 ± 22.05
 
Often
19
1.8
 
145.11 ± 21.81
 
Mental health promotion training experience
     
Yes
138
13.2
3.430
150.73 ± 18.93
0.001
No
908
86.8
 
143.71 ± 22.90
 
Relationship with family members
     
Good
905
86.5
31.940
146.73 ± 22.01
0.001
Average
138
13.2
 
130.77 ± 21.06
 
Bad
3
0.3
 
150.67 ± 35.36
 
A significant other death within a year
     
Yes
143
13.7
0.316
144.98 ± 21.99
0.752
No
903
86.3
 
144.58 ± 22.63
 
Relationship with colleagues
     
Good
848
81.1
33.941
147.32 ± 21.23
0.001
Average
197
18.8
 
133.19 ± 24.36
 
Bad
1
0.1
   
Major career changes within a year
     
Yes
40
3.8
-2.564
135.70 ± 25.83
0.010
No
1006
96.2
 
144.99 ± 22.33
 
Flourishing grading level
     
Very high
510
48.8
142.276
159.44 ± 17.46
0.001
High
267
25.5
 
139.26 ± 13.13
 
Moderate
207
19.8
 
124.54 ± 14.10
 
Low
62
5.9
 
113.68 ± 20.68
 

Nurses’ self-care and flourishing scores

The total score of nurses’ self-care was (144.63 ± 22.53). Among them, 51.72% of the nurses scored lower than the mean score. The scores for the dimensions of self-care awareness, self-care knowledge, healthy lifestyle, occupational self-acceptance, and inner self-fulfillment were (23.43 ± 4.68), (19.40 ± 4.15), (22.08 ± 4.99), (43.82 ± 5.61), and (35.91 ± 6.00), respectively (Table 2). The dimension with the highest score was occupational self-acceptance and healthy lifestyle dimension had the lowest score.
Table 2
Nurses’ total self-care scores and scores on each dimension (N = 1046)
Self-care
Minidium
Maxium
Mean ± SD
Self-care awareness
6
30
23.43 ± 4.68
Self-care knowledge
5
25
19.40 ± 4.15
Healthy lifestyle
6
30
22.08 ± 4.99
Occupational self-acceptance
10
50
43.82 ± 5.61
Inner self fulfillment
9
45
35.91 ± 6.00
Total scale score
36
180
144.63 ± 22.53
The total score of nurses’ flourishing was (45.45 ± 8.83). The percentage of nurses with very high, high, moderate, and low levels of flourishing were 48.8%, 25.5%, 19.8%, and 5.9%, respectively. The self-care score for nurses with very high, high, moderate, and low flourishing levels were (159.44 ± 17.46), (139.26 ± 13.13), (124.54 ± 14.10), (113.68 ± 20.68), respectively.

One-way ANOVA between nurses’ self-care and demographic variables and flourishing

The one-way ANOVA showed that the self-care scores of nurses with different employment modes, age, professional titles, years of working, night shift frequencies, marital statuses, numbers of children, sleep qualities, frequencies of physical exercise, experiences of workplace violence, experience of seeking professional psychological help, experiences of mental health promotion training, relationships with family members, relationships with coworkers, experiences of major career changes, and different flourishing levels were different. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) (Table 1).
The result revealed that nurses with older ages, higher professional titles, higher professional positions, and longer working time achieved higher self-care scores. This indicates that we must pay more attention to young and junior nurses’ self-care abilities. Additionally, there was a negative correlation between night shift frequency and nurses’ self-care scores. Thus, nurse managers need to arrange nurses’ shifts rationally. Interestingly, the result showed a positive relationship between the number of children nurses had raised and nurses’ self-care scores, which indicated that raising a fair number of children helps improve nurses’ self-care.

Multiple linear regression of related factors on nurses’ self-care ability

To ensure a stable model, we included variables with statistically significant differences in the ANOVA analysis as independent variables in multiple linear regression analyses. Nurses’ self-care scores were taken as the dependent variable in the analysis. The values assigned to the independent variables are shown in Table 3. As a result, sleep quality, relationship with colleagues, and flourishing grading entered the regression equation (P<0.05) (Table 4).
Table 3
Assignment of independent variables
Independent variables
Value assignment
Employment mode
In-establishment = 1, Off-establishment = 2
Age
20-30yr = 1, 31–40 yr = 2, 41–50 yr = 3, ≥ 50 yr = 4
Professional title
Junior = 1, Medium = 2, Senior = 3
Years of working
≤ 5yr = 1, 6-15yr = 2, 16-25yr = 3, >25yr = 4
Night shift frequency per month
0 times = 1, 1–4 times = 2, 5–8 times = 3, 9–12 times = 4, >12 times = 5
Marital status
Married = 1, Unmarried = 2, Divorced = 3
Number of children
No child = 1, 1 child = 2, ≥ 2 children = 3
Sleep quality
Very poor = 1, Poor = 2,Average = 3, Good = 4, Very good = 5
Physical exercise frequency per week
≥ 7times = 1, 4-6times = 2, 2-3times = 3, ≤1times = 4
Workplace violence experience
Yes = 1, No = 2
Professional psychological help-seeking help-seeking
Yes = 1, No = 2
Mental health promotion training experience
Yes = 1, No = 2
Relationship with family members
Good = 1, Average = 2, Bad = 3
Relationship with colleagues
Good = 1, Average = 2, Bad = 3
Major career changes within a year
Yes = 1, No = 2
Flourishing grading level
Very high = 1, High = 2, Medium = 3, Low = 4
Table 4
Multiple linear regression of factors associated with nurses’ self-care
Varibles
B
S.E .
β
t
P
Sleep quality
2.015
0.656
0.076
3.074
0.002
Relationship with colleagues
-3.145
1.391
-0.055
-2.260
0.024
Flourishing level
-15.136
0.587
-0.635
-25.798
<0.001
F = 60.699, P<0.001;R2 = 0.501, Adjusted R2 = 0.493。

Discussion

Nurses’ self-care status

The nurses’ self-care score is (144.63 ± 22.53). More than half of the nurses have a self-care score lower than the mean score. The results imply that nurses’ self-care ability requires improvement, which is in line with the findings reported by Chang Hong-Juan [7] and Gao Xia [26]. Previous studies have demonstrated that low self-care levels are closely associated with depression, anxiety, and the like. Meanwhile, improving self-care ability aids in improving care quality, increasing job satisfaction, and reducing the turnover rate [7, 27]. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to improve clinical nurses’ self-care ability. Identifying the factors related to nurses’ self-care and implementing corresponding measures is a good approach to promoting nurses’ self-care ability.

Factors associated with nurses’ self-care

In this study, the quality of sleep exhibited a strong correlation with nurses’ self-car. Nurses with better sleep quality tended to have a higher level of self-care (P = 0.002), which was consistent with the findings of Chang Hong-Juan [7]. This might be because good sleep quality and adequate sleep can facilitate the rapid recovery of body functions, thereby enhancing nurses’ mental health and self-care ability [7]. Furthermore, previous studies have indicated that continuous sleep deprivation and poor sleep quality can lead to individual cognitive decline, which may result in clinical errors such as incorrect medication administration, thus affecting the quality of clinical care [28, 29]. It is crucial to ensure good sleep quality. It has been reported that frequency of night shifts, working department, emotional labor, occupational stress, and coping ability can affect sleep quality [2931]. Therefore, nursing managers should pay attention to the sleep quality of nurses, investigate the reasons for poor sleep quality, and take targeted interventions to improve nurses’ sleep quality and thereby enhancing their self-care ability. For example, they can rationally arrange nurses’ shifts and create a relaxing and harmonious working atmosphere.
Relationship with colleagues is another independent factor affecting nurses’ self-care. A better relationship with colleagues suggests a higher self-care level, as has been discovered in other studies [10, 16, 32]. According to Longo [32], in daily clinical practice, the relationships that nurses are in direct contact with have the greatest impact on them, including those with nurse managers and nurse peers. Thus, establishing a harmonious, trusting, supportive and caring-healing working environment is vital for nurses’ self-care [10, 33]. Harmonious colleague relationships also assist nurses in generating altruistic concepts and caring for patients better, as “caring begets caring” [32]. Nurses can be inspired by others’ care, thereby fully developing their potential and providing better care for patients. The better nurses are cared for, the better they can take care of themselves and their patients. Therefore, nurse managers should be more actively concerned about nurses. For instance, they can investigate what peer caring means for nurses, and explore what hinders nurses’ self-care, such as environmental barriers (e.g., time, workload) or personal barriers (e.g., poor acceptance of others’ caring) [2, 32]. Then, take measures to improve nurses’ caring ability by reducing the impact of impeding factors, encouraging nurses to care for each other.
Last but not least, the flourishing level is highly related to nurses’ self-care. The higher the nurses’ flourishing level, the better their self-care ability is. Keyes [34] and Eraydın [35] reported similar results in their research. The reason might be that the higher the flourishing level, the stronger the sense of purpose [34], and the more positive role a person can play in work [35], which will benefit the person’s career development and self-care [36]. This applies to nurses, high flourishing levels encourage them to work passionately, improve nursing quality and care for patients better. According to previous studies, the education level, marital status, employment mode, and attitudes toward death [37] can affect an individual’s flourishing level [38, 39]. Therefore, nurses should set clear goals and strive for them in their work, for instance, further studying to improve their education level, actively participating in mental health promotion training, reading psychological books, and so on. Nurse managers need to take measures to improve nurses’ flourishing level [38]. They can help nurses set clear career development goals and assist them in realizing these goals. They could care more about nurses with low flourishing levels and organize peer nurses with high flourishing levels and their family members to support these nurses. Inviting psychological experts to give lectures on death education and intimate relationships. Psychological counseling is also a good approach to help improve nurses’ flourishing levels.
However, the difference between male and female nurses was not statistically significant in this study. This is not consistent with the results reported by Udoudo [20], which showed significant differences between males and females and that males are less likely to practice self care than females. This could potentially be attributed to the fact that this research did not involve enough male samples. More male nurses could be recruited to further explore this aspect in future studies. Additionally, the results showed that the employment mode was not an independent factor influencing nurses’ self-care. It is inconsistent with a previous study [26], which reported significant differences among nurses with different employment modes. The likely reason for the discrepancy is that currently in China, nurses with different employment modes have similar working contents, incomes, and career development opportunities. Several other factors in this study did not manifest significant differences either. These include educational level, professional position, religious belief, and significant other death within a year. The cause for this might be that the majority of the samples in this study were general nurses with an undergraduate degree and without religious beliefs, who did not experience significant others’ death within one year. Consequently, the samples with other educational levels, professional positions, religious beliefs, or those who had experienced the death of a significant other in a year were not sufficient in number to identify a difference. Furthermore, whether being born in a one-child family was not significantly related to nurses’ self-care. This might be due to the rapid economic and social development of China as well as the improvement in parenting styles. As a result, children can receive nearly equal amounts of love from their parents regardless of the number of children in the family. Reading psychological books was not found to be an influencing factor. This may be because there are numerous ways for nurses to enhance their psychological-related knowledge. Moreover, excess workload, lack of time, lack of resources were reported as factors influencing nurses’ self-care in previous studies [20, 40], whereas in this research these factors were not well considered. In future studies, factors such as resources and support for nurses’ self-care, workload and the like need to be taken into account.

Strategies to improve nurses’ self-care

It requires the joint efforts of all the stakeholders to improve nurses’ self-care abilities. At the national level, laws and regulations need to be enacted to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of clinical nurses [41]. As per El-Osta [42], a favorable self-care environment can be facilitated by policy, organizations or workplaces. Hospitals should focus more on clinical nurses’ mental health and self-care ability, implementing relevant norms and regulations to ensure nurses’ interests. Moreover, creating a harmonious working atmosphere and striving for nurses’ benefits from the perspective of salary, welfare, and career development are also effective initiatives that hospitals can adopt [2]. Furthermore, the establishment of hospital-based self-care programs may boost self care abilities of nurses [20]. In a word, hospitals and institutions could offer more support and resources to improve nurses’ self-care. For nurse managers, more attention ought to be given to nurses with low self-care scores. They need to analyze the reasons for their low self-care level, and help them improve their self-care ability in appropriate ways. For instance, arranging nurses’ shifts appropriately to enable nurses have sufficient time and energy to care for themselves and establishing peer group for nurses to support each other [20, 33]. Chipu [33] suggested that self-care activities comprised physical self-care activities (e.g. exercise, proper nutrition, adequate sleep, etc.), emotional self-care activities (e.g. stress management strategies, time management, decision-making, problem-solving, etc.) and spiritual self-care activities (e.g. meditation, etc.). Therefore, nurse managers could invite experts to deliver lectures and conduct workshops concerning stress management, problem-solving and related topics to promote nurses’ self-care abilities. They could organize nurses to meditate during rest, etc. For nurses themselves, they could improve their self-care ability through various means, such as physical exercise, good sleep, timely relaxation, meditation, maintaining hobbies, making a gratitude list, and learning, etc. [2, 20, 33]. Adopting a healthy lifestyle through a balanced diet, appropriate exercise, and regulating sleep patterns to maintain physical and psychological health is particularly crucial for improving self-care ability [2]. Watson believes that employing intentional caring-healing modalities like yoga, communication with nature, and prayer will restore harmony and well-being for nurses [33]. Meanwhile, developing trustful interpersonaI relationships plays a vital role in self-care enhancement [33]. In addition to maintain good relationship with colleagues, nurse could keep good interpersonal relationships through the following ways: taking part in volunteer services, keeping regular contacts with friends, spending quality time with loved ones, joining interest groups, etc [2, 33].

Limitations

This study employed a convenience sampling method and only recruited nurses from tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province. Consequently, the representativeness and generalizability of the sample may have been compromised. Moreover, the associated factors of nurses’ self-care in different contexts need to be further explored as the influencing factors may vary in diverse contexts. Last but not least, some interventions proposed in the discussion section require empirical study to evaluate their effectiveness and practical feasibility.

Conclusion

This study explored the factors influencing the self-care ability of clinical nurses. The result showed that sleep quality, colleague relationships, and flourishing levels affect nurses’ self-care ability. Hospital administrators should take measures to enhance nurses’ self-care ability. Strategies include conducting psychological training activities ( developing coping skills, providing death education, and improving relationship management skills, etc.), and implementing supporting initiatives to protect nurses’ interests (such as a reasonable salary system and nursing promotion opportunities). Nurses can improve their self-care ability through cultivating harmonious relationships with colleagues and improving sleep quality, among other means. More studies, particularly qualitative research, need to be carried out in hospitals at all levels to further explore the influencing factors of nurses’ self-care ability. Additionally, more empirical studies are required to explore effective strategies for improving nurses’ self-care.

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to all the nurse managers of the included hospitals who provided significant assistance in the investigation process and to all the clinical nurses who participated in this study. We appreciate Dr Liu Jin for his guidance of the data analysis.

Declarations

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Maternal and Child Health Hospital) (2022-SR-206). All the participants were informed of the purpose and process of this study and gave their consent to participate. The participants were notified that the study adhered the principles of confidentiality and voluntariness. All the data collected would be kept in a secure location and used only for this study. They could participate voluntarily and withdraw from the study at any time. Informed consent to participate was obtained from all of the participants in this study. The survey was conducted anonymously, and participants were not asked to provide their names.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Shan SB, Xu YH, Yue P. Development of nurses’ self-care scale and its reliability and validity test. Chin J Mod Nurs. 2020;026(011):1466–70. Shan SB, Xu YH, Yue P. Development of nurses’ self-care scale and its reliability and validity test. Chin J Mod Nurs. 2020;026(011):1466–70.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng X, Liu YL. Research progress on nurses’ self—care. Chin Nurs Res. 2013;27(34):3852–4. Peng X, Liu YL. Research progress on nurses’ self—care. Chin Nurs Res. 2013;27(34):3852–4.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhan SB, Xu YH. Research progress of self-care in nurses and its measurement. Chin J Mod Nurs. 2020;26(9):1251–4. Zhan SB, Xu YH. Research progress of self-care in nurses and its measurement. Chin J Mod Nurs. 2020;26(9):1251–4.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Watson J. Nursing: human science and human care. A theory of nursing. NLN Publ. 1988;15–2236:1–104. Watson J. Nursing: human science and human care. A theory of nursing. NLN Publ. 1988;15–2236:1–104.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruff A, Hoffman J. Self-care for the Nurse Entrepreneur: finding Time. Balance Beginnings. 2016;36(5):8–25.PubMed Ruff A, Hoffman J. Self-care for the Nurse Entrepreneur: finding Time. Balance Beginnings. 2016;36(5):8–25.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Xi JZ, Ye Y, Zuo ZH, et al. Positive psychology Applied among schools in China. J East China Normal University:Educational Sci. 2019;37(6):149–59. Xi JZ, Ye Y, Zuo ZH, et al. Positive psychology Applied among schools in China. J East China Normal University:Educational Sci. 2019;37(6):149–59.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang HJ, Jie MY. Current situation and potential profile analysis of self-compassion behavior of clinical nurses. Chin J Nurs. 2023;58(13):1615–22. Chang HJ, Jie MY. Current situation and potential profile analysis of self-compassion behavior of clinical nurses. Chin J Nurs. 2023;58(13):1615–22.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sansó N, Galiana L, Oliver A, Pascual A, Sinclair S, Benito E. Palliative Care professionals’ Inner Life: exploring the relationships among Awareness, Self-Care, and Compassion satisfaction and fatigue, Burnout, and coping with death. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;50(2):200–7.CrossRefPubMed Sansó N, Galiana L, Oliver A, Pascual A, Sinclair S, Benito E. Palliative Care professionals’ Inner Life: exploring the relationships among Awareness, Self-Care, and Compassion satisfaction and fatigue, Burnout, and coping with death. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;50(2):200–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18(3):250–5.CrossRefPubMed Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18(3):250–5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng R, Yu Y, Chai S, et al. Examining psychometric properties and measurement invariance of a Chinese version of the Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF) in nursing students and medical workers. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:793–809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meng R, Yu Y, Chai S, et al. Examining psychometric properties and measurement invariance of a Chinese version of the Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF) in nursing students and medical workers. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:793–809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, Wang C, Xu YM. Construction and implementation of a self-care intervention program for oncology nurses. J Nurs Sci. 2023;38(24):56–9. Chen W, Wang C, Xu YM. Construction and implementation of a self-care intervention program for oncology nurses. J Nurs Sci. 2023;38(24):56–9.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu HY, Xie HZh, Liu YL, et al. Current status of knowledge,attitude and practice of humanistic care on nurses in 27 provinces and autonomous regions of China: a multicenter investigation. Chin J Nurs. 2023;58(19):2387–94. Wu HY, Xie HZh, Liu YL, et al. Current status of knowledge,attitude and practice of humanistic care on nurses in 27 provinces and autonomous regions of China: a multicenter investigation. Chin J Nurs. 2023;58(19):2387–94.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Li MY, Huang KH, Hu YL, et al. The exploration of the influencing factors of occupation fatigue of nurses. Chin J Nurs. 2022;57(7):853–8. Li MY, Huang KH, Hu YL, et al. The exploration of the influencing factors of occupation fatigue of nurses. Chin J Nurs. 2022;57(7):853–8.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu CH, Ma L. Research Progress on the methods of reducing pressure of nurses at home and abroad. Chin Nurs Manage. 2017;17(3):291–4. Liu CH, Ma L. Research Progress on the methods of reducing pressure of nurses at home and abroad. Chin Nurs Manage. 2017;17(3):291–4.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Slocum-Gori S, Hemsworth D, Chan WW, Carson A, Kazanjian A. Understanding Compassion satisfaction, Compassion fatigue and burnout: a survey of the hospice palliative care workforce. Palliat Med. 2013;27(2):172–8.CrossRefPubMed Slocum-Gori S, Hemsworth D, Chan WW, Carson A, Kazanjian A. Understanding Compassion satisfaction, Compassion fatigue and burnout: a survey of the hospice palliative care workforce. Palliat Med. 2013;27(2):172–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown CJ. Self-renewal in nursing leadership: the lived experience of caring for self. J Holist Nurs. 2009;27(2):75–84.CrossRefPubMed Brown CJ. Self-renewal in nursing leadership: the lived experience of caring for self. J Holist Nurs. 2009;27(2):75–84.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng X, Liu YL, Zhou H et al. Self-care experiences of nurses: a qualitative research. Chin J Mod Nurs. 2016;22(14):1994–6. Peng X, Liu YL, Zhou H et al. Self-care experiences of nurses: a qualitative research. Chin J Mod Nurs. 2016;22(14):1994–6.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Boykin A, Schoenhofer S. Nursing as caring: a model for transforming practice. NLN Publ. 1993;15–2549:i–108. Boykin A, Schoenhofer S. Nursing as caring: a model for transforming practice. NLN Publ. 1993;15–2549:i–108.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Udoudo DA, et al. Factors influencing nurses’ Self Care practices. J Holist Nursing: Official J Am Holist Nurses’ Association vol. 2023;41(3):285–93.CrossRef Udoudo DA, et al. Factors influencing nurses’ Self Care practices. J Holist Nursing: Official J Am Holist Nurses’ Association vol. 2023;41(3):285–93.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Seligman ME, Steen TA, Park N, Peterson C. Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. Am Psychol. 2005;60(5):410–21.CrossRefPubMed Seligman ME, Steen TA, Park N, Peterson C. Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. Am Psychol. 2005;60(5):410–21.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Satici SA, Uysal R, Akin A. Investigating the Relationship between Flourishing and Self-Compassion: a structural equation modeling Approach. Physiol Belgica. 2013;53(4):85–99. Satici SA, Uysal R, Akin A. Investigating the Relationship between Flourishing and Self-Compassion: a structural equation modeling Approach. Physiol Belgica. 2013;53(4):85–99.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Neff KD. Self-compassion. New York: Harper Collins; 2011. Neff KD. Self-compassion. New York: Harper Collins; 2011.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener E, Wirtz D,Tov W, et al. New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings[J]. Soc Indic Res. 2010;97(2):143–56.CrossRef Diener E, Wirtz D,Tov W, et al. New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings[J]. Soc Indic Res. 2010;97(2):143–56.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai QZ. Study on College Student’s Flourish Condition and its Application In the Dual—factor Model of Mental HeaIth (D). Southern Medical University. 2017. Lai QZ. Study on College Student’s Flourish Condition and its Application In the Dual—factor Model of Mental HeaIth (D). Southern Medical University. 2017.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao X, Liu XD, Wang XL, et al. The level and influencing factors of self-compassion among clinical nurses. Chin J Mod Nurs. 2016;22(2):186–9. Gao X, Liu XD, Wang XL, et al. The level and influencing factors of self-compassion among clinical nurses. Chin J Mod Nurs. 2016;22(2):186–9.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Alkema K, Linton JM, Davies R. A study of the relationship between self-care, compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout among hospice professionals. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2008;4(2):101–19.CrossRefPubMed Alkema K, Linton JM, Davies R. A study of the relationship between self-care, compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout among hospice professionals. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2008;4(2):101–19.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson AL, Jung L, Song Y. Sleep deprivation and error in nurses who work the night shift[J]. J Nurs Adm. 2014;44(1):17–22.CrossRefPubMed Johnson AL, Jung L, Song Y. Sleep deprivation and error in nurses who work the night shift[J]. J Nurs Adm. 2014;44(1):17–22.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Xue YY, Liu TT, Ban JK, et al. Study on the status and relationship between sleep quality and emotional labor and occupational stress in nurses. J Nurses Train. 2020;35(18):1677–81. Xue YY, Liu TT, Ban JK, et al. Study on the status and relationship between sleep quality and emotional labor and occupational stress in nurses. J Nurses Train. 2020;35(18):1677–81.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheng JW, Wang J. The relationships among sleep quality,anxiety and depression of clinical nurses in tertiary hospitals. J Nurs Sci. 2021;36(22):16–8. Sheng JW, Wang J. The relationships among sleep quality,anxiety and depression of clinical nurses in tertiary hospitals. J Nurs Sci. 2021;36(22):16–8.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo WT, Wang WJ. Investigation on sleep quality of nurses in emergency departments of tertiary hospitals and analysis of influencing factors. Chin J Industrial Hygiene Occup Dis. 2019;37(4):286–9. Guo WT, Wang WJ. Investigation on sleep quality of nurses in emergency departments of tertiary hospitals and analysis of influencing factors. Chin J Industrial Hygiene Occup Dis. 2019;37(4):286–9.
32.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Chipu MG, Downing C. The development and implementation of a model to facilitate self-care of the professional nurses caring for critically ill patients. Int J Nurs Sci. 2021;9(1):26–35.PubMedPubMedCentral Chipu MG, Downing C. The development and implementation of a model to facilitate self-care of the professional nurses caring for critically ill patients. Int J Nurs Sci. 2021;9(1):26–35.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Keyes CLM. The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. J Health Behav Res. 2002;43:207–22. Keyes CLM. The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. J Health Behav Res. 2002;43:207–22.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Eraydın Ş, Karagözoğlu Ş. Investigation of self-compassion, self-confidence and submissive behaviors of nursing students studying in different curriculums. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;54:44–50.CrossRefPubMed Eraydın Ş, Karagözoğlu Ş. Investigation of self-compassion, self-confidence and submissive behaviors of nursing students studying in different curriculums. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;54:44–50.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Ge X, Chen G, Liu XY, et al. Current status of flourishing among nurses from perspective of positive psychology and its influencing factors. J Nursing(China). 2023;30(1):67–71. Ge X, Chen G, Liu XY, et al. Current status of flourishing among nurses from perspective of positive psychology and its influencing factors. J Nursing(China). 2023;30(1):67–71.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen D, Lu PJ, Sun DD et al. Research status quo of flourishing theory and its application study in different groups. Chin Nurs Res. 2014,(35):4371–43724373. Chen D, Lu PJ, Sun DD et al. Research status quo of flourishing theory and its application study in different groups. Chin Nurs Res. 2014,(35):4371–43724373.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan HL. Study on Status of Flourishing and its influencing factors among maintenance hemodialysis patients(D). Naval Medical University; 2023. Yan HL. Study on Status of Flourishing and its influencing factors among maintenance hemodialysis patients(D). Naval Medical University; 2023.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross A, Yang L, Wehrlen L, Perez A, Farmer N, Bevans M. Nurses and health-promoting selfcare: do we practice what we preach? J Nurs Adm Manag. 2019b;27(3):599–608. https://doi.org/10.111/ jonm.12718.CrossRef Ross A, Yang L, Wehrlen L, Perez A, Farmer N, Bevans M. Nurses and health-promoting selfcare: do we practice what we preach? J Nurs Adm Manag. 2019b;27(3):599–608. https://​doi.​org/​10.​111/​ jonm.12718.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng L, Chen Q, Fan S, et al. Factors influencing the professional identity of nursing interns: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zeng L, Chen Q, Fan S, et al. Factors influencing the professional identity of nursing interns: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Osta A. The self-care matrix: a unifying framework for self-care. Int J Self Help Self Care. 2019;10:38–56. El-Osta A. The self-care matrix: a unifying framework for self-care. Int J Self Help Self Care. 2019;10:38–56.
Metadaten
Titel
Nurses’ self-care levels and its related factors: a cross-sectional study
verfasst von
Yunlian Kong
Zirong Tong
Longxiu Liu
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02510-x