Introduction
Methods
Design and search strategy
Eligibility criteria
Literature screening and data extraction
Literature quality assessment
First author/Year | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 | Score | Literature level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jiang 2018 [11] | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 4 | medium |
Cui 2019 [12] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Jin 2021 [13] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Zhao 2021 [14] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Wang 2023 [15] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Li 2023 [16] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Gao 2023 [17] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Long 2020 [19] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Lv 2020 [20] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Li 2021 [21] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Xu 2022 [22] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Hu 2019 [23] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Li 2017 [24] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Shi 2018 [25] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Yang 2021 [26] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Ju 2023 [27] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Liu 2023 [28] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Shi 2020 [29] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Luan 2023 [30] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Liu 2018 [31] | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 4 | medium |
Zou 2019 [32] | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 4 | medium |
Yu 2020 [33] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Bian 2020 [34] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | Medium |
Zhou 2022 [35] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Ma 2018 [36] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NO | NO | NO | NO | Yes | - | 5 | medium |
Data analysis methods
Results
Search results
Study characteristics
First author/Year | Sample size | Sampling methods | Region | Evaluation tools | Relevant factors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jiang 2018 [11] | 106 | not mentioned | Guangxi | MBI-GS | C |
Cui 2019 [12] | 86 | Convenient sampling | Jiangsu | MBI-GS | CG |
Jin 2021 [13] | 242 | random sampling | Qingdao | MBI | CD |
Zhao 2021 [14] | 230 | Convenient sampling | Jilin | MBI | C |
Wang 2023 [15] | 421 | Convenient sampling | Shandong | MBI | CE |
Li 2023 [16] | 75 | Convenient sampling | Beijing | MBI-GS | AC |
Gao 2023 [17] | 293 | Convenient sampling | Shandong | MBI | CE |
Long 2020 [19] | 128 | Convenient sampling | Sichuan | MBI-GS | S |
Lv 2020 [20] | 98 | Purposeful sampling | Shandong | MBI | H |
Li 2021 [21] | 509 | Convenient sampling | Beijing | MBI-GS | D |
Xu 2022 [22] | 236 | Convenient sampling | Jingsu | MBI | IJ |
Hu 2019 [23] | 289 | Convenient sampling | Shandong | MBI | AB |
Li 2017 [24] | 570 | stratified cluster sampling | Xinjiang | MBI | K |
Shi 2018 [25] | 85 | Convenient sampling | Henan | MBI | D |
Yang 2021 [26] | 364 | Convenient sampling | Beijing | MBI | BD |
Ju 2023 [27] | 600 | Convenient sampling | Jiangsu | MBI | F |
Liu 2023 [28] | 110 | Convenient sampling | Jiangsu | MBI | D |
Shi 2020 [29] | 212 | Convenient sampling | Ningbo | MBI-GS | G |
Luan 2023 [30] | 78 | Convenient sampling | Hebei | MBI-GS | G |
Liu 2018 [31] | 300 | Convenient sampling | Beijing | MBI | H |
Zou 2019 [32] | 37 | not mentioned | Guangdong | MBI | D |
Yu 2020 [33] | 218 | Convenient sampling | Jiangsu | MBI | F |
Bian 2020 [34] | 263 | Convenient sampling | Beijing、 Wuhan | MBI | Q |
Zhou 2022 [35] | 235 | Multi-stage sampling | Shandong | MBI | R |
Ma 2018 [36] | 276 | Convenient sampling | Shanxi | MBI | A |
Results of the meta-analysis of burnout and associated factors
Number | Relevant factors | Fisher's Z and 95%CI | Summaryr and 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|
1 | job immersion | −0.41 (−0.48,−0.33) | −0.39 (−0.45,−0.32) |
2 | work-family conflict | 0.56 (0.48,0.63) | 0.52 (0.36,0.64) |
3 | job stress | 0.64 (0.45,0.82) | 0.56 (0.42,0.68) |
4 | willingness to leave | 0.45 (0.35,0.54) | 0.42 (0.34,0.49) |
5 | social support | −0.47 (−0.55,−0.39) | −0.46 (−0.58,−0.33) |
6 | psychological capital | −0.58 (−0.70,−0.47) | −0.53 (−0.60,−0.45) |
7 | well-being | −0.60 (−0.92,−0.28) | −0.54 (−0.73,−0.27) |
8 | hidden absenteeism | 0.54 (0.43,0.65) | 0.49 (0.41,0.57) |
Number | Relevant factors |
---|---|
1 | Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy |
2 | Self-Regulation of Fatigue |
3 | Safety Culture |
4 | Job Demands |
5 | Job Resources |
6 | Occupational Identity |
7 | Occupational Stress |
8 | Perceived Risk |
9 | Self-Compassion |
10 | Organizational Silence |
11 | Willingness to Stay |
Correlation between burnout and job immersion
Correlation between burnout and work–family conflict
Correlation between burnout and job stress
Correlation between burnout and willingness to leave
Correlation between burnout and social support
Correlation between burnout and psychological capital
Correlation analysis between burnout and well-being
Correlation between burnout and hidden absenteeism
Publication bias and sensitivity analyses
Program | Z-value | 95%CI | I2 (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Shi 2018 | 0.67 | (0.46,0.88) | 89 |
Yang 2021 | 0.7 | (0.53,0.86) | 69 |
Liu 2023 | 0.59 | (0.37,0.81) | 89 |
Zou 2019 | 0.66 | (0.46,0.86) | 89 |
Li 2021 | 0.58 | (0.41,0.75) | 67 |
Program | Z-value | 95% CI | I2 (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Cui 2019 | −0.62 | (−0.73, −0.51) | 73 |
Wang 2023 | −0.63 | (−0.73, −0.52) | 58 |
Jin 2021 | −0.57 | (−0.68, −0.46) | 69 |
Gao 2023 | −0.61 | (−0.73, −0.48) | 76 |
Jiang 2018 | −0.57 | (−0.68, −0.46) | 72 |
Zhao 2021 | −0.58 | (−0.7, −0.46) | 73 |
Li 2023 | −0.58 | (−0.7, −0.47) | 76 |
Subgroup analysis
Program | Literature Volume | Merged Z-value | 95% CI | Heterogeneity (I2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Year | ||||
2018–2019 | 2 | 0.5 | (0.32, 0.69) | 0 |
2021 | 2 | 0.68 | (0.61, 0.75) | 96 |
2023 | 1 | 0.81 | (0.62, 1) | |
Region | ||||
North | 3 | 0.61 | (0.36, 0.86) | 92 |
South | 2 | 0.69 | (0.39, 0.99) | 60 |
Sample size | ||||
< 100 | 2 | 0.5 | (0.32, 0.69) | 0 |
≥ 100 | 1 | 0.81 | (0.62, 1) | |
> 200 | 2 | 0.68 | (0.61, 0.75) | 96 |
Program | Literature volume | Merged Z-value | 95% CI | Heterogeneity (I2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018–2019 | 2 | −0.59 | (−0.74, −0.45) | 84 |
2021 | 2 | −0.69 | (−0.79, −0.60) | 0 |
2023 | 3 | −0.49 | (−0.56, −0.42) | 42 |
Region | ||||
North | 5 | −0.57 | (−0.62, −0.51) | 74 |
South | 2 | −0.59 | (−0.74, −0.45) | 84 |
Sample Size | ||||
< 100 | 2 | −0.52 | (−0.68, −0.36) | 66 |
≥ 100 | 1 | −0.76 | (−0.95, −0.56) | |
> 200 | 4 | −0.56 | (−0.62, −0.51) | 79 |