Introduction
Nurses constitute a significant proportion of healthcare providers in hospitals and play a crucial role in the delivery of healthcare services. An unhealthy work environment adversely impacts nurses’ performance and well-being, diminishes the quality of care, and negatively influences patient outcomes. Therefore, fostering and maintaining a healthy work environment for nurses is imperative [
1].
One of the critical hazards in nursing workplaces is workplace bullying (WB). WB is defined as any intentional, negative behavior within interpersonal relationships that aims to harm the victim. These behaviors are typically categorized into three types:
person-related bullying (e.g., humiliation, ridicule, spreading rumors, or persistent criticism of mistakes),
work-related bullying (e.g., withholding essential information, disregarding opinions, or assigning excessive workloads), and
physical bullying (e.g., making obscene gestures, physical pushing, or threats of violence) [
2].
Research indicates that WB is alarmingly prevalent among nurses. For example, a study conducted in Egypt reported that 89% of nurses had experienced WB [
3]. Similarly, a study in Singapore found that 42% of nurses had encountered WB within the past six months [
4]. In Iran, another study revealed that 75% of nurses had experienced WB [
5].
WB is a major source of stress within healthcare environments. Exposure to WB is strongly linked to psychological issues, including depression, anxiety, stress, and increased suicidal ideation, as well as a range of physical health problems such as insomnia, joint pain, heart palpitations, hypertension, gastrointestinal disturbances, and headaches. WB also contributes to heightened levels of burnout and diminished work motivation among nurses. Its impact extends to reduced job satisfaction, increased absenteeism, heavier organizational workloads, higher staff turnover, and escalating costs for healthcare systems [
6,
7]. The literature indicates that the negative consequences of WB extend beyond nursing staff and directly impact patient care. WB distracts nurses from their professional responsibilities, thereby increasing the likelihood of clinical errors. This decline in attentiveness compromises the quality of care, jeopardizes patient safety, and negatively affects health outcomes. Furthermore, it impairs the achievement of desired treatment goals and raises the risk of complications, ultimately undermining patient prognosis and care delivery standards [
7‐
9].
WB is particularly prevalent in high-stress healthcare environments such as intensive care units (ICUs) [
10]. In these settings, WB creates a hostile work environment and significantly increases nurses’ stress levels. This issue is especially critical in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) due to the vulnerability of the patients and the special care needs they require. Research highlights that nurses working in PICUs face significant emotional challenges, including conflicts between personal and professional responsibilities, the necessity of providing meticulous attention to patients, the burden of making urgent and complex end-of-life care decisions, high workloads, and competitive dynamics among staff. These factors contribute to elevated stress levels and severe burnout [
11,
12]. A study in Greece found that 44.9% of NICU nurses reported being victims of WB, while 83.9% had witnessed it among colleagues. The study highlighted that both direct and indirect exposure to WB can significantly impact nurses’ mental health [
12].
WB is a serious threat to nurses’ physical and mental well-being and has significant adverse effects on patient care. Therefore, the development of targeted interventions to prevent and mitigate WB is imperative. Designing effective strategies for addressing WB in PICUs requires a comprehensive understanding of the underlying causes of bullying. Qualitative research methods are suited for exploring the lived experiences of nurses, examining the contextual factors that facilitate WB, and identifying the complex interplay of elements that contribute to its occurrence.
Methods
Aim and design
This study aimed to explore the underlying causes of WB in PICUs using a qualitative research design and a conventional content analysis approach. Conventional content analysis is well-suited for generating in-depth insights and systematically analyzing data derived from participants’ experiences. This method enables researchers to interpret and understand phenomena based on the meanings and perspectives provided by participants. Conventional content analysis involves collecting data through interviews, followed by a systematic coding process. Initially, raw data are segmented into preliminary codes, which are then grouped into subcategories. These subcategories are further refined and consolidated into overarching main categories, providing a comprehensive understanding of the factors contributing to WB in the PICUs.
Setting and sample
This study was conducted in Children’s Medical Center Hospital, affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, in 2024. This hospital has six types of ICUs (including emergency ICU, neonatal ICU, infant ICU, pediatric ICU, cardiac ICU and open heart ICU). After obtaining ethical approval, the researcher (HT) visited the PICUs and established contact with the nurses to identify potential participants who met the study’s inclusion criteria. Then, purposive sampling was employed to select participants.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: a willingness to participate, a minimum of a bachelor’s degree in nursing, at least six months of clinical experience, a readiness to share personal experiences, and having meaningful experience as either a victim or witness of bullying, as reported by the participants. Exclusion criteria included a lack of interest in continuing the interview or withdrawal from participation at any stage of the study.
In qualitative research, determining the sample size is guided by the principle of data saturation. Data saturation occurs when no new information, themes, or codes emerge from subsequent interviews and the data begin to mirror that of earlier interviews [
13]. In this study, after conducting 11 face-to-face interviews, the codes generated were similar to those identified in previous interviews, indicating that data saturation had been achieved.
Data collection
Data were collected through semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. The interviews were conducted before or after the nurses’ shifts in a designated break room, a quiet and relaxed environment free from external stressors. Prior to each interview, the researcher provided participants with an overview of the study’s purpose and objectives. Ethical considerations, including voluntary participation, confidentiality, and the right to withdraw at any time, were thoroughly explained. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and, with their permission, the interviews were recorded using the researcher’s mobile phone.
An interview guide was developed specifically for this study (see Supplementary Material
1). At the beginning of each session, the interviewer collected basic demographic information, including the participant’s gender, age, marital status, education level, and work experience. The interview opened with a broad, open-ended question:
“Based on your professional experience,
how would you define or describe workplace bullying?” Participants were then asked, “From
your observations or experiences,
what factors or conditions within the PICU contribute to workplace bullying?” To explore the topic further and uncover hidden dimensions, follow-up questions were asked based on the participants’ responses. At the conclusion of each interview, participants were thanked for their time and asked to provide their contact information for potential follow-up to confirm their statements or conduct additional interviews if necessary. Interviews lasted an average of 30 minutes.
Data analysis
The data analysis was conducted using Microsoft Word 2013, following a conventional content analysis approach. In this method, categories and concepts are derived directly from the interview data rather from predefined frameworks, allowing for the emergence of novel insights into the research phenomenon. The analytical process followed the five-step approach outlined by Graneheim and Lundman [
14]. In the first step, the researcher transcribed the full interview text immediately after each session, without any modifications or interpretations. In the second step, the transcribed text was read multiple times to develop a comprehensive understanding of its content. In the third step, significant portions of the text were identified, and initial codes were generated. The fourth step involved grouping these initial codes based on shared meanings to form broader categories. In the final step, the core themes underlying these categories were identified. Throughout the analysis, efforts were made to maintain maximum homogeneity within each category and maximum heterogeneity between categories.
Rigor
In this study, we applied Lincoln and Guba’s four criteria for ensuring trustworthiness: credibility, confirmability, dependability, and transferability. Several strategies were employed to enhance the rigor of the research. Interviews were transcribed promptly after each session to maintain accuracy. The research topic was explored comprehensively through a series of well-structured and relevant questions. Participant diversity was ensured to capture a wide range of perspectives. Additionally, two experts in qualitative studies independently reviewed the data to enhance confirmability. Then they compared the results and resolved any disagreement by consensus or by referring to other experts. Participant’s feedback on the results was obtained to validate interpretations. Finally, the researcher fostered a long-term, trust-based relationship with participants, further enhancing the credibility and depth of the data collected [
14].
Ethical consideration
This study received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Rehabilitation at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, with the approval code IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1402.216. The researcher provided adequate information about the title, objectives, and ethical principles of the research, including voluntary participation and confidentiality, to the research units. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants, and all interviews were recorded using the researcher’s mobile phone with participants’ permission. To maintain confidentiality, each participant was assigned a unique code. Audio recordings and transcripts were securely stored in a system accessible only to the research team. Additionally, identifying information such as participants’ names, ages, or specific wards was excluded from the final report to further ensure confidentiality. Participants were thoroughly informed that their data would be used solely for research purposes and would not be shared with their colleagues or supervisors.
Discussion
Nurses in PICUs are frequently exposed to high workloads, unpredictable patient outcomes, complex medical procedures, and the emotional toll of caring for critically ill children and their families [
15]. One of the significant factors affecting nurses in PICUs is WB, which exacerbates the already challenging work environment. This study aimed to elucidate the causes of WB among nurses in pediatric intensive care units.
The findings suggest that WB arises from a combination of victim-related, organizational, and environmental factors. One of the primary categories identified through data analysis was termed “The Imposing and Stereotypical Atmosphere.” Data within this theme indicate that specific characteristics of the work environment are among the leading causes of bullying. One of the sub-categories was “Prevalence of Power Imbalance.” Some individuals in the workplace possess more power due to factors such as being older, having more work experience, holding organizational positions, or having close relationships with nursing managers. These individuals consider themselves superior to others, and their elevated power allows them to start bullying. Previous studies have identified power imbalances as one of the primary antecedents of WB, which can manifest through formal structures or informally via factors such as work experience and social or interpersonal interactions [
16,
17].
The results revealed that differences in age and experience serve as a source of power in the PICU, potentially contributing to WB. This finding may be due to the organization typically respecting and valuing experienced nurses more. The lack of support for newly hired nurses, coupled with different perspectives toward them, creates a power imbalance rooted in age and work experience differences. Similar to our findings, a study conducted in Poland revealed that young nurses had higher scores of perceived WB [
18]. Another study conducted in Saudi Arabia reported an inverse relationship between age and perceived WB, consistent with our findings [
19]. Additionally, a study conducted on emergency department nurses in Jordan reported that those with fewer years of experience were more likely to experience or be exposed to WB [
20]. The findings of previous studies suggest that power imbalance due to differences in age and work experience is a worldwide issue, affecting not only ICUs but also many other wards.
According to our findings, organizational position is another source of power imbalance in the nursing workplace. Power is a fundamental aspect of organizations and is exerted on employees by the organization and its managers to ensure that they fulfill their responsibilities [
21]. In this regard, many managers believe that exercising power and influence over subordinates is essential for ensuring compliance and maintaining control. However, some belive that achieving organizational goals and asserting authority effectively is not possible without resorting to bullying tactics. This perspective reinforces the perception of WB as a common occurrence in the workplace and a necessary strategy. In alignment with our findings, Hutchinson et al. (2010) identified organizational position as a significant source of power that enables individuals to engage in bullying behaviors within the workplace [
22]. Additionally, another study reported that nursing managers had significantly lower scores of perceived WB compared to clinical nurses, consistent with our study [
18].
One of the sub-categories identified in our results was “Work Challenges in the Intensive Care Unit.” The results suggest that the stress and heavy workload faced by nurses in PICUs, primarily due to the critical condition of patients, are significant factors contributing to WB. The exposure to these stressors, coupled with both physical and psychological pressures, poses a serious threat to nurses’ mental health, leading to decreased resilience and increased job burnout [
23,
24]. This deterioration in mental well-being can heighten tensions and conflicts among nursing staff, ultimately resulting in bullying behaviors. Consistent with the findings of the present study, previous research has identified staff shortages, inadequate equipment, and limited resources as key factors contributing to WB [
16,
17].
The findings indicated that immature behaviors within the workplace are linked to the occurrence of WB. These behaviors reflect a lack of maturity in interpersonal relationships among staff members. A primary source of bullying behaviors arises from the attitudes individuals hold toward one another, which are significantly influenced by their interactions in the workplace. The prevalence of unprofessional behaviors, coupled with a decline in intimacy and teamwork among nurses, cultivates negative attitudes, ultimately fostering an environment conducive to violence and bullying [
17]. Interestingly, one of the immature behaviors reported by participants was retaliation. It appears that individuals often initiate bullying behaviors in environments where they have previously been victimized. Once they gain power or identify an appropriate situation, they engage in negative behaviors to assert control over the environment or to satisfy themselves mentally. In line with our findings, a study conducted in South Korea found that WB is significantly related to organizational culture [
25]. Consistent with our findings, another study also highlighted the role of organizational culture in shaping WB [
26].
Another sub-category was “Passive reactions of nursing managers.” A significant factor hindering nursing managers from addressing WB effectively is that many of them perceive WB as a necessary and inherent aspect of the nursing profession, which leads them to normalize such behaviors. Therefore, they often view these actions as permissible and refrain from implementing the necessary punitive measures when they receive reports of WB [
22]. This issue enables bullies to initiate their negative actions, as they are aware that no punitive interventions will be implemented. Aligning with our findings, Anusiewicz et al. (2019) identified poor leadership and management as antecedents of WB [
16]. Confirming our results, Karatuna et al. (2020) explained that due to the passive reaction of managers, there is an organizational culture that tolerates bullying and normalizes it [
27]. However, it is essential to educate nurses on the importance of upholding a zero-tolerance policy toward WB and actively reporting any occurrences they witness or experience [
28].
Another primary category derived from the data analysis was termed ‘The Victim’s Achilles’ Heel.’ This category underscores various vulnerabilities of the victim, including inadequate clinical skills and poor communication skills, which can embolden the bully to engage in negative behaviors. It is reasonable to assume that bullies often exploit their victims’ vulnerabilities to initiate negative behaviors. According to the participants, nurses who demonstrate strong competence, confidence, and assertiveness are less likely to become targets of bullying. Aligning with our findings, Fang et al. (2020) indicated that nurses exhibiting lower levels of assertiveness are more frequently subjected to WB [
29]. Supporting our results, a concept analysis identified several individual factors, such as low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, and ineffective coping strategies in the victim, as contributors to the prevalence of WB [
17].
Implications
The findings of this study highlight the complex interplay of organizational and personal factors contributing to WB among nurses in PICUs. Future studies should explore the effectiveness of interventions, such as enhancing clinical and communication skills, at reducing perceived WB among nurses. Additionally, research across different healthcare settings can offer insights into the broader organizational and cultural factors influencing WB. Based on the findings, the research team recommends several strategies for nursing managers and relevant authorities to prevent WB in the nursing workplace:
Limitations
In this study, participants were recruited from a single hospital, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other settings. A significant challenge encountered during the research was the participants’ strong emphasis on confidentiality. Many individuals hesitated to share their experiences due to concerns about potential identity disclosure and the repercussions that might follow. To address these concerns, participants were assured of the confidentiality of their identities. Consequently, details regarding their workplace have not been disclosed in this study.
Conclusion
This study identified both organizational and individual factors contributing to WB in PICUs. The “Imposing and Stereotypical Atmosphere” category highlights power imbalances, organizational culture, and managerial inaction as potential causes of WB. The “Victim’s Achilles’ Heel” category underscores the role of clinical and communication deficiencies in the occurrence of WB. Our study contributes to the body of knowledge by emphasizing that addressing WB requires a holistic approach focusing on both nurses and the organization. According to the results, reducing WB requires targeted interventions, including leadership training, structured mentorship, and professional development in clinical and communication skills. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of interventions, such as enhancing communication skills and clinical competencies, in reducing perceived WB.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.