Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2025 | Research

Exploring the causes of workplace bullying among nurses in pediatric intensive care units: a qualitative study

verfasst von: Jamalodin Begjani, Nahid Dehghan Nayeri, Moein Salami, Hanie Tavasoli, Mohammad Mehdi Rajabi

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2025

Abstract

Introduction

Workplace bullying (WB) is a significant occupational hazard for nurses, especially in high-stress environments such as pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). WB adversely affects nurses’ physical and mental health, patient safety, and overall quality of care. This study aimed to explore the causes of WB among nurses working in PICUs.

Methods

This qualitative study used a conventional content analysis approach. Eleven nurses from the PICUs of the Children’s Medical Center Hospital, affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences, participated in the study. Participants were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured face-to-face interviews, continuing until data saturation was achieved. The data were analyzed using Graneheim and Lundman’s five-step approach. Lincoln and Guba’s four criteria—credibility, confirmability, dependability, and transferability—were used to ensure the study’s rigor.

Results

The analysis of the data revealed two main categories: [1] the “Imposing and Stereotypical Atmosphere,” which encompasses sub- categories such as power imbalances, work-related challenges, immature behaviors among staff, and passive reactions of nursing managers; and [2] the “Victim’s Achilles’ Heel,” which emphasizes weaknesses in clinical and communication skills as contributing factors to WB.

Conclusion

The study identifies organizational and personal factors as causes of WB in PICUs. Nursing leaders can implement targeted interventions aimed at improving workplace culture, monitoring interpersonal relationships, enhancing communication skills, and promoting the clinical skills of staff. These strategies can reduce WB and create a healthier work environment for nurses.
Begleitmaterial
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12912-025-02915-2.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Nurses constitute a significant proportion of healthcare providers in hospitals and play a crucial role in the delivery of healthcare services. An unhealthy work environment adversely impacts nurses’ performance and well-being, diminishes the quality of care, and negatively influences patient outcomes. Therefore, fostering and maintaining a healthy work environment for nurses is imperative [1].
One of the critical hazards in nursing workplaces is workplace bullying (WB). WB is defined as any intentional, negative behavior within interpersonal relationships that aims to harm the victim. These behaviors are typically categorized into three types: person-related bullying (e.g., humiliation, ridicule, spreading rumors, or persistent criticism of mistakes), work-related bullying (e.g., withholding essential information, disregarding opinions, or assigning excessive workloads), and physical bullying (e.g., making obscene gestures, physical pushing, or threats of violence) [2].
Research indicates that WB is alarmingly prevalent among nurses. For example, a study conducted in Egypt reported that 89% of nurses had experienced WB [3]. Similarly, a study in Singapore found that 42% of nurses had encountered WB within the past six months [4]. In Iran, another study revealed that 75% of nurses had experienced WB [5].
WB is a major source of stress within healthcare environments. Exposure to WB is strongly linked to psychological issues, including depression, anxiety, stress, and increased suicidal ideation, as well as a range of physical health problems such as insomnia, joint pain, heart palpitations, hypertension, gastrointestinal disturbances, and headaches. WB also contributes to heightened levels of burnout and diminished work motivation among nurses. Its impact extends to reduced job satisfaction, increased absenteeism, heavier organizational workloads, higher staff turnover, and escalating costs for healthcare systems [6, 7]. The literature indicates that the negative consequences of WB extend beyond nursing staff and directly impact patient care. WB distracts nurses from their professional responsibilities, thereby increasing the likelihood of clinical errors. This decline in attentiveness compromises the quality of care, jeopardizes patient safety, and negatively affects health outcomes. Furthermore, it impairs the achievement of desired treatment goals and raises the risk of complications, ultimately undermining patient prognosis and care delivery standards [79].
WB is particularly prevalent in high-stress healthcare environments such as intensive care units (ICUs) [10]. In these settings, WB creates a hostile work environment and significantly increases nurses’ stress levels. This issue is especially critical in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) due to the vulnerability of the patients and the special care needs they require. Research highlights that nurses working in PICUs face significant emotional challenges, including conflicts between personal and professional responsibilities, the necessity of providing meticulous attention to patients, the burden of making urgent and complex end-of-life care decisions, high workloads, and competitive dynamics among staff. These factors contribute to elevated stress levels and severe burnout [11, 12]. A study in Greece found that 44.9% of NICU nurses reported being victims of WB, while 83.9% had witnessed it among colleagues. The study highlighted that both direct and indirect exposure to WB can significantly impact nurses’ mental health [12].
WB is a serious threat to nurses’ physical and mental well-being and has significant adverse effects on patient care. Therefore, the development of targeted interventions to prevent and mitigate WB is imperative. Designing effective strategies for addressing WB in PICUs requires a comprehensive understanding of the underlying causes of bullying. Qualitative research methods are suited for exploring the lived experiences of nurses, examining the contextual factors that facilitate WB, and identifying the complex interplay of elements that contribute to its occurrence.

Methods

Aim and design

This study aimed to explore the underlying causes of WB in PICUs using a qualitative research design and a conventional content analysis approach. Conventional content analysis is well-suited for generating in-depth insights and systematically analyzing data derived from participants’ experiences. This method enables researchers to interpret and understand phenomena based on the meanings and perspectives provided by participants. Conventional content analysis involves collecting data through interviews, followed by a systematic coding process. Initially, raw data are segmented into preliminary codes, which are then grouped into subcategories. These subcategories are further refined and consolidated into overarching main categories, providing a comprehensive understanding of the factors contributing to WB in the PICUs.

Setting and sample

This study was conducted in Children’s Medical Center Hospital, affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, in 2024. This hospital has six types of ICUs (including emergency ICU, neonatal ICU, infant ICU, pediatric ICU, cardiac ICU and open heart ICU). After obtaining ethical approval, the researcher (HT) visited the PICUs and established contact with the nurses to identify potential participants who met the study’s inclusion criteria. Then, purposive sampling was employed to select participants.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: a willingness to participate, a minimum of a bachelor’s degree in nursing, at least six months of clinical experience, a readiness to share personal experiences, and having meaningful experience as either a victim or witness of bullying, as reported by the participants. Exclusion criteria included a lack of interest in continuing the interview or withdrawal from participation at any stage of the study.
In qualitative research, determining the sample size is guided by the principle of data saturation. Data saturation occurs when no new information, themes, or codes emerge from subsequent interviews and the data begin to mirror that of earlier interviews [13]. In this study, after conducting 11 face-to-face interviews, the codes generated were similar to those identified in previous interviews, indicating that data saturation had been achieved.

Data collection

Data were collected through semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. The interviews were conducted before or after the nurses’ shifts in a designated break room, a quiet and relaxed environment free from external stressors. Prior to each interview, the researcher provided participants with an overview of the study’s purpose and objectives. Ethical considerations, including voluntary participation, confidentiality, and the right to withdraw at any time, were thoroughly explained. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and, with their permission, the interviews were recorded using the researcher’s mobile phone.
An interview guide was developed specifically for this study (see Supplementary Material 1). At the beginning of each session, the interviewer collected basic demographic information, including the participant’s gender, age, marital status, education level, and work experience. The interview opened with a broad, open-ended question: “Based on your professional experience, how would you define or describe workplace bullying?” Participants were then asked, “From your observations or experiences, what factors or conditions within the PICU contribute to workplace bullying?” To explore the topic further and uncover hidden dimensions, follow-up questions were asked based on the participants’ responses. At the conclusion of each interview, participants were thanked for their time and asked to provide their contact information for potential follow-up to confirm their statements or conduct additional interviews if necessary. Interviews lasted an average of 30 minutes.

Data analysis

The data analysis was conducted using Microsoft Word 2013, following a conventional content analysis approach. In this method, categories and concepts are derived directly from the interview data rather from predefined frameworks, allowing for the emergence of novel insights into the research phenomenon. The analytical process followed the five-step approach outlined by Graneheim and Lundman [14]. In the first step, the researcher transcribed the full interview text immediately after each session, without any modifications or interpretations. In the second step, the transcribed text was read multiple times to develop a comprehensive understanding of its content. In the third step, significant portions of the text were identified, and initial codes were generated. The fourth step involved grouping these initial codes based on shared meanings to form broader categories. In the final step, the core themes underlying these categories were identified. Throughout the analysis, efforts were made to maintain maximum homogeneity within each category and maximum heterogeneity between categories.

Rigor

In this study, we applied Lincoln and Guba’s four criteria for ensuring trustworthiness: credibility, confirmability, dependability, and transferability. Several strategies were employed to enhance the rigor of the research. Interviews were transcribed promptly after each session to maintain accuracy. The research topic was explored comprehensively through a series of well-structured and relevant questions. Participant diversity was ensured to capture a wide range of perspectives. Additionally, two experts in qualitative studies independently reviewed the data to enhance confirmability. Then they compared the results and resolved any disagreement by consensus or by referring to other experts. Participant’s feedback on the results was obtained to validate interpretations. Finally, the researcher fostered a long-term, trust-based relationship with participants, further enhancing the credibility and depth of the data collected [14].

Ethical consideration

This study received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Rehabilitation at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, with the approval code IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1402.216. The researcher provided adequate information about the title, objectives, and ethical principles of the research, including voluntary participation and confidentiality, to the research units. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants, and all interviews were recorded using the researcher’s mobile phone with participants’ permission. To maintain confidentiality, each participant was assigned a unique code. Audio recordings and transcripts were securely stored in a system accessible only to the research team. Additionally, identifying information such as participants’ names, ages, or specific wards was excluded from the final report to further ensure confidentiality. Participants were thoroughly informed that their data would be used solely for research purposes and would not be shared with their colleagues or supervisors.

Results

The study included 11 participants, most of whom were female (81.8%) and held a bachelor’s degree in nursing (72.7%). The participants’ ages ranged from 24 to 49 years, with an average age of 33.7 years. Their work experience varied from 2 to 25 years, with a mean of approximately 9.3 years (Table 1).
Table 1
The demographic characteristics of the participants
Row
Gender
Age
Work Experience
Education level
1
Female
49
25
Bachelor
2
Female
25
2
Bachelor
3
Female
35
12
Bachelor
4
Female
33
10
Master of Science
5
Female
30
8
Bachelor
6
Female
29
6
Bachelor
7
Female
37
13
Bachelor
8
Male
24
2
Master of Science
9
Female
26
3
Master of Science
10
Female
31
9
Bachelor
11
Male
34
12
Bachelor
Data analysis initially produced 456 codes, which were consolidated into 136 after merging similar ones. Ultimately, 6 subcategories and 2 main categories were formed. The analysis indicated that the imposing and stereotypical atmosphere, along with the victim’s Achilles’ heel, were factors contributing to the occurrence of WB (Table 2).
Table 2
The categories and sub-categories extracted after data analysis
Categories
Sub-categories
The imposing and stereotypical atmosphere
Prevalence of power imbalance
Work challenges in intensive care unit
Immature behaviors in the organization
Passive reactions of nursing managers
The victim’s Achilles’ heel
Inadequate clinical skills
Poor communication skills

The imposing and stereotypical atmosphere

Prevalence of power imbalance

Participants in this study expressed that due to the characteristics of PICUs, the occurrence of WB is inevitable. They identified the power imbalance between the victim and the bully—an issue prevalent in PICUs—as a primary factor contributing to WB. Participants observed that bullies frequently perceive themselves as superior to their victims, which reinforces their belief that they possess the right to initiate bullying behavior. In this context, one participant stated:
“Some individuals in this ward have given orders and bullied others to the point that bullying has become a part of their nature, and it’s no longer possible to confront them. They are so entrenched in this environment that nothing can shake them.” (Participant 8).
Participants identified several factors contributing to the power imbalance within the PICUs. One participant highlighted age differences as a significant reason for power disparity:
“Most of the time, the bullies are older than me, and I cannot speak up in front of them. I once tried to respond respectfully to one of them, and she was offended, saying, ‘When you were entering into nursing, I had already worked in this ward for ten years.’ It’s true that respecting elders is important, but I also need to maintain my respect.” (Participant 9).
Another participant attributed the power imbalance to differences in work experience, noting that individuals with more experience often hold a position of authority over their less experienced colleagues.
“More experienced colleagues think that because they have more experience, whatever they say or do is right. If they find even a small mistake in you, they will judge you on the spot and issue a verdict. Meanwhile, they also make mistakes, but no one dares to say anything to them. It looks like that having more experience serves as a defensive shield that I haven’t yet acquired.” (Participant 2).
One participant indicated that the bully is often a nursing manager, highlighting that organizational hierarchy serves as another source of power disparity:
“Some of the nursing managers have shaped memories in my mind that I will never forget. They order others without paying attention to the fact that other people also have pride. It seems they forget they were once in the same position that others are in now. They order without respecting others, and sometimes they make people feel saddened.” (Participant 6).
Participants identified unprofessional workplace relationships as another source of power disparity:
“Some people think that because the head nurse is their friend, they have the right to criticize and belittle others.” (Participant 10).

Work challenges in intensive care unit

All participants in this study underscored the influence of challenging characteristics of the work environment on the occurrence of WB. In this context, one participant expressed that the critical condition of patients contributes to the occurrence of bullying behaviors:
“The patients in our ward are really in bad shape, and even a very small mistake can harm them. Such working conditions leave no room for nerves. Many times, I don’t have the patience to ask for something politely; I unconsciously start giving orders and shouting. I know all of this is wrong, but put yourself in my place: you have three patients, two of whom are on ventilators and could die at any moment.” (Participant 7).
Another participant linked the high workload in the PICUs to the occurrence of bullying, suggesting that the demands placed on nurses can exacerbate tensions and contribute to negative interactions.
“Everyone can behave well under normal circumstances, but when you have a lot of work, any behavior may come out of you. Often, all three patients assigned to me are in critical condition, and from the beginning to the end of the shift, I work like a robot. In such situations, I feel like a bomb that could explode at any moment. Only God knows when this bomb will go off and which colleague will be affected by the shrapnel. Many times, I tell others not to joke with me or to stay away from me because this shift is going to be very hard, and I have no nerves left.” (Participant 10).

Immature behaviors in the organization

One participant, drawing from her experience in the emergency department, asserted that the prevalence of immature behaviors—such as backbiting, disrespect, and a lack of camaraderie among staff—contributes to WB within the PICUs:
“I previously worked in the emergency department. Disrespect and conflicts among staff were much less frequent there, and there were warmer relationships. However, in this ward, the atmosphere is heavy; many of the staff members are not close to each other. Many of them try to demonstrate that their skills or knowledge are superior, which is why they constantly criticize each other and disclose each other’s mistakes in a disrespectful manner.” (Participant 11).
Another participant observed that the relationships among many staff members are often characterized by hostility, which can create an environment conducive to bullying behavior.
“Many of our colleagues gossip about how others work with a particular animosity, as if they are speaking about a sworn enemy. Usually, the person being talked about hears these comments, and one day will retaliate.” (Participant 8).
Another participant identified staff members’ attempts at retaliation as a contributing factor to the occurrence of WB.
“I once told one of my colleagues that the way she was changing the bandage was incorrect. Since that day, her relationship with me has deteriorated significantly. In retaliation, she started making unnecessary complaints about me.” (Participant 4).

Passive reactions of nursing managers

According to the participants, the passive response of nursing managers in addressing WB is a key factor in its emergence and persistence in the workplace. One participant noted that a lack of effective monitoring of interpersonal relationships contributes to the prevalence of bullying behaviors.
“Everything has a beginning. If you address it early on, it won’t escalate, and the issue can be resolved quickly. When the head nurse sees that I have a problem with one of my colleagues, she should intervene quickly to find out the cause of our conflict and try to resolve it. However, many times, these issues don’t seem to matter to them. It’s as if they don’t want their subordinates to have a good relationship. As a result, problems between the staff remain unresolved and turn into grudges. Later on, when the opportunity arises, these grudges can lead to fights and abusive language.” (Participant 8).
Another participant expressed dissatisfaction with nursing managers’ passive behavior in response to reports of bullying, indicating that this inaction further perpetuates the issue within the workplace.
“I have told the head nurse several times that one of the staff is mistreating me, nitpicking, and being rude. But instead of punishing her or at least advising her to behave better, the head nurse told me that I’m new in this ward and inexperienced, encouraging me not to get involved in these matters. I don’t know where to report this person’s behavior. If the head nurse is not going to take serious action, then who will?” (Participant 2).

The victim’s Achilles’ heel

Inadequate clinical skills

From the participants’ perspective, the weaknesses of the victim play a critical role in the onset of bullying. One participant identified deficient clinical competence as a primary factor that provokes bullying behavior from colleagues.
“When I first started my job, I made a lot of mistakes and didn’t know many things. For example, there were times when the suction catheter became non-sterile due to my negligence, and I didn’t even realize where the catheter had touched. However, other colleagues who witnessed this would yell at me a lot. Now, looking back, I see that many of the comments I received and the arguments that arose were because I made errors in carrying out procedures. If I had worked with more skill, I would have made fewer mistakes, and the other colleagues wouldn’t have gotten so angry.” (Participant number 1).
Another participant asserted that a nurse’s proficiency in clinical skills is a significant factor influencing the occurrence of WB within the workplace.
“I have always worked with precision, and only a few people tried to criticize my work. However, colleagues who frequently make mistakes, especially new nurses, constantly face disrespect from others.” (Participant number 7).

Poor communication skills

Participants identified weaknesses in communication skills as a significant factor contributing to WB. One participant noted that a lack of assertiveness enables colleagues to persist in their bullying behavior.
“My experience has shown me that when someone disrespects you and you don’t react firmly, that person thinks she has done the right thing. Later, if she finds herself in a similar situation, she will behave with even more rudeness and disrespect.” (Participant 5).
Another participant contended that poor communication creates opportunities for others to engage in negative behaviors.
“In the first days of my job, I was very quiet and withdrawn. Whenever a problem arose, I was the first person they would approach. I would always lose my composure. In discussions, I was afraid to voice my opinion, even though I knew I was right. When you don’t have the confidence to speak up, they try to blame everything on you and take advantage of you.” (Participant 7).
Another participant also believed that a lack of communication skills contributes to social isolation in the workplace, thereby placing individuals at greater risk of being bullied by others.
“My friend was one of those people with whom you couldn’t have a proper conversation. She was very stiff and unapproachable. I don’t think anyone ever became close to her. Because of her specific demeanor, no one felt sympathy for her. She had many conflicts with others.” (Participant 4).

Discussion

Nurses in PICUs are frequently exposed to high workloads, unpredictable patient outcomes, complex medical procedures, and the emotional toll of caring for critically ill children and their families [15]. One of the significant factors affecting nurses in PICUs is WB, which exacerbates the already challenging work environment. This study aimed to elucidate the causes of WB among nurses in pediatric intensive care units.
The findings suggest that WB arises from a combination of victim-related, organizational, and environmental factors. One of the primary categories identified through data analysis was termed “The Imposing and Stereotypical Atmosphere.” Data within this theme indicate that specific characteristics of the work environment are among the leading causes of bullying. One of the sub-categories was “Prevalence of Power Imbalance.” Some individuals in the workplace possess more power due to factors such as being older, having more work experience, holding organizational positions, or having close relationships with nursing managers. These individuals consider themselves superior to others, and their elevated power allows them to start bullying. Previous studies have identified power imbalances as one of the primary antecedents of WB, which can manifest through formal structures or informally via factors such as work experience and social or interpersonal interactions [16, 17].
The results revealed that differences in age and experience serve as a source of power in the PICU, potentially contributing to WB. This finding may be due to the organization typically respecting and valuing experienced nurses more. The lack of support for newly hired nurses, coupled with different perspectives toward them, creates a power imbalance rooted in age and work experience differences. Similar to our findings, a study conducted in Poland revealed that young nurses had higher scores of perceived WB [18]. Another study conducted in Saudi Arabia reported an inverse relationship between age and perceived WB, consistent with our findings [19]. Additionally, a study conducted on emergency department nurses in Jordan reported that those with fewer years of experience were more likely to experience or be exposed to WB [20]. The findings of previous studies suggest that power imbalance due to differences in age and work experience is a worldwide issue, affecting not only ICUs but also many other wards.
According to our findings, organizational position is another source of power imbalance in the nursing workplace. Power is a fundamental aspect of organizations and is exerted on employees by the organization and its managers to ensure that they fulfill their responsibilities [21]. In this regard, many managers believe that exercising power and influence over subordinates is essential for ensuring compliance and maintaining control. However, some belive that achieving organizational goals and asserting authority effectively is not possible without resorting to bullying tactics. This perspective reinforces the perception of WB as a common occurrence in the workplace and a necessary strategy. In alignment with our findings, Hutchinson et al. (2010) identified organizational position as a significant source of power that enables individuals to engage in bullying behaviors within the workplace [22]. Additionally, another study reported that nursing managers had significantly lower scores of perceived WB compared to clinical nurses, consistent with our study [18].
One of the sub-categories identified in our results was “Work Challenges in the Intensive Care Unit.” The results suggest that the stress and heavy workload faced by nurses in PICUs, primarily due to the critical condition of patients, are significant factors contributing to WB. The exposure to these stressors, coupled with both physical and psychological pressures, poses a serious threat to nurses’ mental health, leading to decreased resilience and increased job burnout [23, 24]. This deterioration in mental well-being can heighten tensions and conflicts among nursing staff, ultimately resulting in bullying behaviors. Consistent with the findings of the present study, previous research has identified staff shortages, inadequate equipment, and limited resources as key factors contributing to WB [16, 17].
The findings indicated that immature behaviors within the workplace are linked to the occurrence of WB. These behaviors reflect a lack of maturity in interpersonal relationships among staff members. A primary source of bullying behaviors arises from the attitudes individuals hold toward one another, which are significantly influenced by their interactions in the workplace. The prevalence of unprofessional behaviors, coupled with a decline in intimacy and teamwork among nurses, cultivates negative attitudes, ultimately fostering an environment conducive to violence and bullying [17]. Interestingly, one of the immature behaviors reported by participants was retaliation. It appears that individuals often initiate bullying behaviors in environments where they have previously been victimized. Once they gain power or identify an appropriate situation, they engage in negative behaviors to assert control over the environment or to satisfy themselves mentally. In line with our findings, a study conducted in South Korea found that WB is significantly related to organizational culture [25]. Consistent with our findings, another study also highlighted the role of organizational culture in shaping WB [26].
Another sub-category was “Passive reactions of nursing managers.” A significant factor hindering nursing managers from addressing WB effectively is that many of them perceive WB as a necessary and inherent aspect of the nursing profession, which leads them to normalize such behaviors. Therefore, they often view these actions as permissible and refrain from implementing the necessary punitive measures when they receive reports of WB [22]. This issue enables bullies to initiate their negative actions, as they are aware that no punitive interventions will be implemented. Aligning with our findings, Anusiewicz et al. (2019) identified poor leadership and management as antecedents of WB [16]. Confirming our results, Karatuna et al. (2020) explained that due to the passive reaction of managers, there is an organizational culture that tolerates bullying and normalizes it [27]. However, it is essential to educate nurses on the importance of upholding a zero-tolerance policy toward WB and actively reporting any occurrences they witness or experience [28].
Another primary category derived from the data analysis was termed ‘The Victim’s Achilles’ Heel.’ This category underscores various vulnerabilities of the victim, including inadequate clinical skills and poor communication skills, which can embolden the bully to engage in negative behaviors. It is reasonable to assume that bullies often exploit their victims’ vulnerabilities to initiate negative behaviors. According to the participants, nurses who demonstrate strong competence, confidence, and assertiveness are less likely to become targets of bullying. Aligning with our findings, Fang et al. (2020) indicated that nurses exhibiting lower levels of assertiveness are more frequently subjected to WB [29]. Supporting our results, a concept analysis identified several individual factors, such as low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, and ineffective coping strategies in the victim, as contributors to the prevalence of WB [17].

Implications

The findings of this study highlight the complex interplay of organizational and personal factors contributing to WB among nurses in PICUs. Future studies should explore the effectiveness of interventions, such as enhancing clinical and communication skills, at reducing perceived WB among nurses. Additionally, research across different healthcare settings can offer insights into the broader organizational and cultural factors influencing WB. Based on the findings, the research team recommends several strategies for nursing managers and relevant authorities to prevent WB in the nursing workplace:
Enhancing workplace culture and communication
To reduce power imbalances and workplace conflicts, nursing leaders should promote a culture of respect and open communication. Providing leadership training on conflict resolution can promote professional relationships and create a more supportive work environment.
Implementing effective reporting and intervention mechanisms
Establishing clear policies for reporting and addressing WB can help reduce its occurrence. Implementing anonymous reporting systems is an essential step in effectively managing this issue.
Empowering nurses through professional development
According to our results, nurses with weaker clinical and communication skills are more vulnerable to WB. Therefore, implementing targeted training programs is essential. Workshops on interpersonal communication and clinical skill development can enhance nurses’ confidence and competence, enabling them to navigate workplace challenges more effectively.

Limitations

In this study, participants were recruited from a single hospital, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other settings. A significant challenge encountered during the research was the participants’ strong emphasis on confidentiality. Many individuals hesitated to share their experiences due to concerns about potential identity disclosure and the repercussions that might follow. To address these concerns, participants were assured of the confidentiality of their identities. Consequently, details regarding their workplace have not been disclosed in this study.

Conclusion

This study identified both organizational and individual factors contributing to WB in PICUs. The “Imposing and Stereotypical Atmosphere” category highlights power imbalances, organizational culture, and managerial inaction as potential causes of WB. The “Victim’s Achilles’ Heel” category underscores the role of clinical and communication deficiencies in the occurrence of WB. Our study contributes to the body of knowledge by emphasizing that addressing WB requires a holistic approach focusing on both nurses and the organization. According to the results, reducing WB requires targeted interventions, including leadership training, structured mentorship, and professional development in clinical and communication skills. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of interventions, such as enhancing communication skills and clinical competencies, in reducing perceived WB.

Acknowledgements

Hereby, the research team extends their gratitude to Mrs. Leila Hashemi, Educational Supervisor at Children’s Medical Center Hospital, and all those who contributed to the writing and publication of this study.

Declarations

The Research Ethics Committees of School of Nursing and Midwifery & Rehabilitation of Tehran University of Medical Sciences approved the current study (no. IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1402.225). In this study, we adhered to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the ethical declaration of Helsinki. Informed written consent was obtained from the nurses. The participants were ensured of the confidentiality of their information and the right to withdraw from the study. All interviews were recorded using the researcher’s mobile phone with participants’ permission. To maintain confidentiality, each participant was assigned a unique code. Audio recordings and transcripts were securely stored in a system accessible only to the research team. Additionally, identifying information such as participants’ names, ages, or specific wards was excluded from the final report to further ensure confidentiality. Participants were thoroughly informed that their data would be used solely for research purposes and would not be shared with their colleagues or supervisors.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Anhänge

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kafle S, Paudel S, Thapaliya A, Acharya R. Workplace violence against nurses: a narrative review. J Clin Translational Res. 2022;8(5):421. Kafle S, Paudel S, Thapaliya A, Acharya R. Workplace violence against nurses: a narrative review. J Clin Translational Res. 2022;8(5):421.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Al Muharraq EH, Baker OG, Alallah SM. The prevalence and the relationship of workplace bullying and nurses turnover intentions: A cross sectional study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022;8:23779608221074655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Al Muharraq EH, Baker OG, Alallah SM. The prevalence and the relationship of workplace bullying and nurses turnover intentions: A cross sectional study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022;8:23779608221074655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaber S. Workplace bullying prevalence, popularity and its impact on nurses’ profession commitment. Egypt J Health Care. 2020;11(2):307–18.CrossRef Gaber S. Workplace bullying prevalence, popularity and its impact on nurses’ profession commitment. Egypt J Health Care. 2020;11(2):307–18.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosier S, Zhang H, Goh HS. Workplace bullying among nurses in Singapore: A quantitative survey. Malaysian J Nurs (MJN). 2023;14(3):55–66.CrossRef Hosier S, Zhang H, Goh HS. Workplace bullying among nurses in Singapore: A quantitative survey. Malaysian J Nurs (MJN). 2023;14(3):55–66.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Esfahani AN, Shahbazi G. Workplace bullying in nursing: the case of Azerbaijan Province. Iran Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014;19(4):409–15.PubMed Esfahani AN, Shahbazi G. Workplace bullying in nursing: the case of Azerbaijan Province. Iran Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014;19(4):409–15.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Leach LS, Poyser C, Butterworth P. Workplace bullying and the association with suicidal ideation/thoughts and behaviour: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74(1):72–9.CrossRefPubMed Leach LS, Poyser C, Butterworth P. Workplace bullying and the association with suicidal ideation/thoughts and behaviour: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74(1):72–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh HS, Hosier S, Zhang H. Prevalence, antecedents, and consequences of workplace bullying among nurses—a summary of reviews. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(14):8256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goh HS, Hosier S, Zhang H. Prevalence, antecedents, and consequences of workplace bullying among nurses—a summary of reviews. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(14):8256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Koh WMS. Management of work place bullying in hospital: A review of the use of cognitive rehearsal as an alternative management strategy. Int J Nurs Sci. 2016;3(2):213–22. Koh WMS. Management of work place bullying in hospital: A review of the use of cognitive rehearsal as an alternative management strategy. Int J Nurs Sci. 2016;3(2):213–22.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Houck NM, Colbert AM. Patient safety and workplace bullying: an integrative review. J Nurs Care Qual. 2017;32(2):164–71.CrossRefPubMed Houck NM, Colbert AM. Patient safety and workplace bullying: an integrative review. J Nurs Care Qual. 2017;32(2):164–71.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Aristidou L, Mpouzika MD, Karanikola MN. Exploration of workplace bullying in emergency and critical care nurses in Cyprus. Connect: World Crit Care Nurs. 2020;13(4):162–74. Aristidou L, Mpouzika MD, Karanikola MN. Exploration of workplace bullying in emergency and critical care nurses in Cyprus. Connect: World Crit Care Nurs. 2020;13(4):162–74.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vittner D, Young H, D’Agata A. Stress and burnout influence NICU healthcare professionals’ decision-making on family-centered care delivery: an international survey. J Neonatal Nurs. 2022;28(6):430–6.CrossRef Vittner D, Young H, D’Agata A. Stress and burnout influence NICU healthcare professionals’ decision-making on family-centered care delivery: an international survey. J Neonatal Nurs. 2022;28(6):430–6.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chatziioannidis I, Bascialla FG, Chatzivalsama P, Vouzas F, Mitsiakos G. Prevalence, causes and mental health impact of workplace bullying in the neonatal intensive care unit environment. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chatziioannidis I, Bascialla FG, Chatzivalsama P, Vouzas F, Mitsiakos G. Prevalence, causes and mental health impact of workplace bullying in the neonatal intensive care unit environment. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1893–907.CrossRefPubMed Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1893–907.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–12.CrossRefPubMed Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–12.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Anusiewicz CV, Shirey MR, Patrician PA. Workplace bullying and newly licensed registered nurses: an evolutionary concept analysis. Workplace Health Saf. 2019;67(5):250–61. doi: 10.1177/2165079919827046. PubMed PMID: 30880634.CrossRefPubMed Anusiewicz CV, Shirey MR, Patrician PA. Workplace bullying and newly licensed registered nurses: an evolutionary concept analysis. Workplace Health Saf. 2019;67(5):250–61. doi: 10.1177/2165079919827046. PubMed PMID: 30880634.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Embree JL, White AH, editors. Concept analysis: nurse-to‐nurse lateral violence. Nursing forum. Wiley Online Library; 2010. Embree JL, White AH, editors. Concept analysis: nurse-to‐nurse lateral violence. Nursing forum. Wiley Online Library; 2010.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Al Muharraq EH, Baker OG, Alallah SM. The prevalence and the relationship of workplace bullying and nurses turnover intentions: A cross sectional study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022;8:23779608221074655. Epub 20220124. doi: 10.1177/23779608221074655. PubMed PMID: 35097205; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8796075.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Al Muharraq EH, Baker OG, Alallah SM. The prevalence and the relationship of workplace bullying and nurses turnover intentions: A cross sectional study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022;8:23779608221074655. Epub 20220124. doi: 10.1177/23779608221074655. PubMed PMID: 35097205; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8796075.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutchinson M, Vickers MH, Jackson D, Wilkes L. Bullying as circuits of power: an Australian nursing perspective. Administrative Theory Praxis. 2010;32(1):25–47.CrossRef Hutchinson M, Vickers MH, Jackson D, Wilkes L. Bullying as circuits of power: an Australian nursing perspective. Administrative Theory Praxis. 2010;32(1):25–47.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammadi Ali Abadi F, Shamsaei F, Tapak L. Relationship between mental workload and mental health of nurses caring for patients with Covid-19. Sci J Nurs Midwifery Paramedical Fac. 2022;8(2):15–30. Mohammadi Ali Abadi F, Shamsaei F, Tapak L. Relationship between mental workload and mental health of nurses caring for patients with Covid-19. Sci J Nurs Midwifery Paramedical Fac. 2022;8(2):15–30.
25.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang L, Hsiao LP, Fang SH, Chen BC. Effects of assertiveness and psychosocial work condition on workplace bullying among nurses: A cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2020;26(6):e12806.CrossRefPubMed Fang L, Hsiao LP, Fang SH, Chen BC. Effects of assertiveness and psychosocial work condition on workplace bullying among nurses: A cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2020;26(6):e12806.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Exploring the causes of workplace bullying among nurses in pediatric intensive care units: a qualitative study
verfasst von
Jamalodin Begjani
Nahid Dehghan Nayeri
Moein Salami
Hanie Tavasoli
Mohammad Mehdi Rajabi
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2025
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2025
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02915-2