Introduction
With the development of modern medicine, people’s demand for health has gradually evolved into a patient-centered care model [
1]. This model emphasizes that nursing practice is not only concerned with the treatment of disease in the individual but is committed to the maintenance of total health and includes humanistic, ethical, and moral factors. The Ethical Guidelines for Nurses in China, released in 2014, emphasize the principles of respect, care, non-injury, and justice as guidelines for nursing practice [
2]. A study has demonstrated the close correlation between the provision of quality care and ethical practice, and they underscoring that ethics as a core element of the nursing profession [
3]. Therefore, practicing ethical behavior is an effective way to alleviate nurses’ moral distress, contribute to the harmonization of the nurse-patient relationship, and enhance the quality of nursing services. Nursing professionals need to continuously strengthen their ethical awareness and implement ethical guidelines to ensure that the nursing care provided to patients is comprehensive, of high standard, and consistent with the rights and interests of the patients.
In China, nurses play a crucial role in the healthcare system, maintaining the longest and closest relationships with patients. They frequently deal with considerations that can lead to difficult ethical dilemmas [
4]. The initial step in the ethical decision-making process in nursing is ethical sensitivity [
5]. Consequently, when encountering ethical and moral dilemmas, nurses must possess adequate sensitivity and ability to identify ethical issues for making accurate judgments and appropriate decisions. Ethical sensitivity is the ability to identify potential ethical conflicts when ethical issues have not yet arisen, to recognize patients’ needs, to evaluate the impact of nursing practices on patients’ interests, and to be aware of an individual’s self-awareness of roles and responsibilities [
6]. Such sensitivity directly or indirectly influences nurses’ ethical decision-making when dealing with ethical issues and is crucial for improving nurses’ ethical decision-making skills.
Nowadays, ethics is a compulsory subject in healthcare courses. As far as the nursing profession is concerned, a growing number of studies emphasize the necessity of ethics education for the nursing profession [
7]. A large number of studies have investigated the ethical sensitivity of nursing students, finding that several factors are related to their ethical sensitivity, such as gender [
8], grade [
9], economic status [
10], family type [
11], etc. Nevertheless, the research on the ethical sensitivity of nursing students in China is still in its early stages. Previous researchers have studied ethical sensitivity among Chinese nursing students [
12], but the timing of this study was during the global COVID-19 epidemic, so there may have been interference from negative emotions affecting the precision of the results. The research has shown that the emergence of unexpected public health events can trigger unpleasant feelings like worry and depression, which can have a lasting impact on people’s mental health [
13]. Negative emotions can affect an individual’s judgment and decision-making ability [
14], causing deviation from normal ethical guidelines and codes of conduct.At this time, the epidemic has been effectively controlled, and students have shifted their learning methods from online to offline. Given the numerous factors influencing ethical sensitivity and the evolving field of nursing, further investigation of the current situation is still necessary.
Humanistic care is the essence and core of nursing, referring to the attention to an individual’s living conditions, respect for personal value, and maintenance of human dignity, with the aim of promoting the comprehensive growth and development of the individual [
15]. Existing research indicates that there is a link between humanistic care and ethical sensitivity. In practice, nurses with strong humanistic care ability pay more attention to the humanistic emotional needs of patients. When confronted with ethical issues, these nurses not only demonstrate comprehensive thinking and weighing abilities but also fully respect and protect the rights and interests of patients. Therefore, they are usually able to make decisions that conform to nursing ethics [
16].
Given the limited research on nursing students in China, this study examined the current state of undergraduate nursing students’ ethical sensitivity, identified the factors influencing nursing students’ ethical sensitivity, and investigated the relationship between ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability. This was done to provide useful theoretical support and practical references for the development and enhancement of the nursing profession.
Methods
Design and aim
This is a descriptive and cross-sectional study. This study investigates the level of ethical sensitivity among undergraduate nursing students, analyzes the factors influencing ethical sensitivity, and examines the correlation with humanistic care ability.
Participants
The convenience sampling method was used to select first- to fourth-year undergraduate nursing students from three public universities in Guangdong Province, China, from November 2023 to January 2024 to respond to the survey. Inclusion criteria: (1) full-time nursing undergraduate students; (2) voluntary acceptance of study participation. Exclusion criteria: suspended students.
Sample size
The sample size collected in this study was calculated according to Kendall’s cross-sectional survey formula N × (10–15) [
17]. The sample size was more than 10 times the number of independent variables, which were 21 in this study (including 14 items in the General Information Questionnaire, 4 dimensions in the Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire For Nursing Students, and 3 dimensions in the Humanistic Care Ability Inventory), and considering the rate of 20% invalid questionnaires, this study requires a minimum of 252 participants.
Instrument
The self-designed general information questionnaire had a total of 14 variables, including gender, grade, place of residence (rural or urban), single-child status (yes or no), religion (yes or no), political affiliation, student position (yes or no), frequency of participation in volunteer activities, taking nursing ethics courses (yes or no), relationship with parents, attitudes towards being a nursing major, willingness to work in nursing, experience in learning nursing ethics, experience in caring for patients (yes or no).
Ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students
The questionnaire was developed by Muramatsu, a Japanese scholar, following a survey of undergraduate nursing students at 10 Japanese universities in 2019 [
18]. This questionnaire has a total of 13 items, including 3 dimensions: respect for the individual, distributive justice, and maintaining patients’ confidentiality. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.82. Chinese scholar Yu [
19] adapted the ESQ-NS scale cross-culturally, and the Chinese version of the ESQ-NS contained 13 items, which was consistent with the source scale, but the number of dimensions increased from 3 to 4 in the original version (respect for the individual, reasonable care, distributive justice, maintaining of patients’ confidentiality). The total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.821.
Humanistic care ability inventory
Nursing humanistic care ability was designed by American scholar Nkongho [
20] in 1990, with a total of 37 items, including 3 dimensions of knowing, courage, and patience. The scale was scored using a 7-point Likert scale, with each item ranging from 1 to 7 points, 7 points for “completely agree” and 1 point for “completely disagree”, with 13 items requiring reverse scoring. The total score ranged from 37 to 259, with higher scores indicating greater humanistic care ability. A scale score > 210.53 is a high level, 171.55-210.53 is a moderate level, and a score < 171.55 is a low level [
21].Xujuan carried out the translation and sinicization, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.84, indicating good internal consistency [
22]. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha value was 0.79.
Procedure
The researchers used the “Questionnaire Star” platform to send a link to an electronic questionnaire to the college counselors of the three universities via WeChat (the most commonly used social media in China). College counselors were asked to forward the questionnaire to their students. At the same time, all undergraduate nursing students used WeChat and had access to the e-questionnaire, with each IP address allowed to be filled only once. An informed consent form consisting of an explanation of the purpose of the study and the survey process, a promise of anonymity, and voluntary participation was sent to participants via WeChat. After completing the data collection, we reviewed all questionnaires to exclude invalid ones. The specific exclusion criteria were (1) identical answers across all questions; (2) questionnaires submitted within 3 minutes(questionnaires take approximately 5–10 min to fill out); (3) responses that showed a regular pattern.
Ethics requirements
This study follows the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki and adheres to the Measures of the Ethical Review of Life Science and Medical Research Involving Humans. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the School of Nursing at Guangdong Pharmaceutical University. Each participant gave informed consent before the start of the study, participation was completely voluntary, and the confidentiality and anonymity of participants were ensured.
Data analysis
Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 27.0. categorical data (gender, grade, etc.) were described by number and percentage, and continuous data were described by mean and standard deviation. Comparisons between groups were made using two independent samples t-tests or one-way analysis of variance. Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of ethical sensitivity.
Limitations of the study
This study has some limitations. Firstly, the study was conducted in only three colleges in Guangdong Province, China, which limits its generalizability. Future studies could expand the range of samples to include nursing students from more regions and at different educational levels to explore the current status of ethical sensitivity among nursing students. Secondly, the cross-sectional design of this study made it difficult to completely understand the students’ perceptions of ethical sensitivity, and the types of influencing factors that were identified were not comprehensive enough. It is suggested that future studies may use qualitative and mixed research methods combined with longitudinal observation methods to further consider the role of other relevant factors in nursing students’ ethical sensitivity.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.