Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Research

Correlation between ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability among undergraduate nursing students: a cross-sectional study

verfasst von: Yun Zhang, Sijia Li, Yanfang Huang, Congjing Song, Jiale Li, Weiqiang Chen, Yiling Yang

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Background

In nursing practice, a high level of ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability must always be maintained. A limited number of studies have investigated the correlation between the level of ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability of nursing students.

Methods

A survey study was conducted from November 2023 to January 2024 among 656 undergraduate nursing students using the General Information Questionnaire, Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire For Nursing Students, and Humanistic Care Ability Inventory.

Results

The total ethical sensitivity score of nursing students (36.01 ± 6.31) was positively correlated with the total humanistic care ability score (r = 0.426, P < 0.01), and the results of the multivariate linear regression analysis showed that grade, relationship with parents, liking of the nursing major, willingness to work in nursing, experiences in learning nursing ethics, experience of caring for patients, and humanistic care ability are the main influencing factors of nursing students’ ethical sensitivity.

Conclusion

The ethical sensitivity of undergraduate nursing students is at a moderate level, which shows a moderate and significant correlation with their humanistic care ability. College nursing educators and administrators should focus on integrating humanistic care ability education while increasing ethical education to cultivate excellent nursing students with comprehensive abilities.
Hinweise
Yun Zhang and Sijia Li contributed equally to this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

With the development of modern medicine, people’s demand for health has gradually evolved into a patient-centered care model [1]. This model emphasizes that nursing practice is not only concerned with the treatment of disease in the individual but is committed to the maintenance of total health and includes humanistic, ethical, and moral factors. The Ethical Guidelines for Nurses in China, released in 2014, emphasize the principles of respect, care, non-injury, and justice as guidelines for nursing practice [2]. A study has demonstrated the close correlation between the provision of quality care and ethical practice, and they underscoring that ethics as a core element of the nursing profession [3]. Therefore, practicing ethical behavior is an effective way to alleviate nurses’ moral distress, contribute to the harmonization of the nurse-patient relationship, and enhance the quality of nursing services. Nursing professionals need to continuously strengthen their ethical awareness and implement ethical guidelines to ensure that the nursing care provided to patients is comprehensive, of high standard, and consistent with the rights and interests of the patients.
In China, nurses play a crucial role in the healthcare system, maintaining the longest and closest relationships with patients. They frequently deal with considerations that can lead to difficult ethical dilemmas [4]. The initial step in the ethical decision-making process in nursing is ethical sensitivity [5]. Consequently, when encountering ethical and moral dilemmas, nurses must possess adequate sensitivity and ability to identify ethical issues for making accurate judgments and appropriate decisions. Ethical sensitivity is the ability to identify potential ethical conflicts when ethical issues have not yet arisen, to recognize patients’ needs, to evaluate the impact of nursing practices on patients’ interests, and to be aware of an individual’s self-awareness of roles and responsibilities [6]. Such sensitivity directly or indirectly influences nurses’ ethical decision-making when dealing with ethical issues and is crucial for improving nurses’ ethical decision-making skills.
Nowadays, ethics is a compulsory subject in healthcare courses. As far as the nursing profession is concerned, a growing number of studies emphasize the necessity of ethics education for the nursing profession [7]. A large number of studies have investigated the ethical sensitivity of nursing students, finding that several factors are related to their ethical sensitivity, such as gender [8], grade [9], economic status [10], family type [11], etc. Nevertheless, the research on the ethical sensitivity of nursing students in China is still in its early stages. Previous researchers have studied ethical sensitivity among Chinese nursing students [12], but the timing of this study was during the global COVID-19 epidemic, so there may have been interference from negative emotions affecting the precision of the results. The research has shown that the emergence of unexpected public health events can trigger unpleasant feelings like worry and depression, which can have a lasting impact on people’s mental health [13]. Negative emotions can affect an individual’s judgment and decision-making ability [14], causing deviation from normal ethical guidelines and codes of conduct.At this time, the epidemic has been effectively controlled, and students have shifted their learning methods from online to offline. Given the numerous factors influencing ethical sensitivity and the evolving field of nursing, further investigation of the current situation is still necessary.
Humanistic care is the essence and core of nursing, referring to the attention to an individual’s living conditions, respect for personal value, and maintenance of human dignity, with the aim of promoting the comprehensive growth and development of the individual [15]. Existing research indicates that there is a link between humanistic care and ethical sensitivity. In practice, nurses with strong humanistic care ability pay more attention to the humanistic emotional needs of patients. When confronted with ethical issues, these nurses not only demonstrate comprehensive thinking and weighing abilities but also fully respect and protect the rights and interests of patients. Therefore, they are usually able to make decisions that conform to nursing ethics [16].
Given the limited research on nursing students in China, this study examined the current state of undergraduate nursing students’ ethical sensitivity, identified the factors influencing nursing students’ ethical sensitivity, and investigated the relationship between ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability. This was done to provide useful theoretical support and practical references for the development and enhancement of the nursing profession.

Methods

Design and aim

This is a descriptive and cross-sectional study. This study investigates the level of ethical sensitivity among undergraduate nursing students, analyzes the factors influencing ethical sensitivity, and examines the correlation with humanistic care ability.

Participants

The convenience sampling method was used to select first- to fourth-year undergraduate nursing students from three public universities in Guangdong Province, China, from November 2023 to January 2024 to respond to the survey. Inclusion criteria: (1) full-time nursing undergraduate students; (2) voluntary acceptance of study participation. Exclusion criteria: suspended students.

Sample size

The sample size collected in this study was calculated according to Kendall’s cross-sectional survey formula N × (10–15) [17]. The sample size was more than 10 times the number of independent variables, which were 21 in this study (including 14 items in the General Information Questionnaire, 4 dimensions in the Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire For Nursing Students, and 3 dimensions in the Humanistic Care Ability Inventory), and considering the rate of 20% invalid questionnaires, this study requires a minimum of 252 participants.

Instrument

General information questionnaire

The self-designed general information questionnaire had a total of 14 variables, including gender, grade, place of residence (rural or urban), single-child status (yes or no), religion (yes or no), political affiliation, student position (yes or no), frequency of participation in volunteer activities, taking nursing ethics courses (yes or no), relationship with parents, attitudes towards being a nursing major, willingness to work in nursing, experience in learning nursing ethics, experience in caring for patients (yes or no).

Ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students

The questionnaire was developed by Muramatsu, a Japanese scholar, following a survey of undergraduate nursing students at 10 Japanese universities in 2019 [18]. This questionnaire has a total of 13 items, including 3 dimensions: respect for the individual, distributive justice, and maintaining patients’ confidentiality. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.82. Chinese scholar Yu [19] adapted the ESQ-NS scale cross-culturally, and the Chinese version of the ESQ-NS contained 13 items, which was consistent with the source scale, but the number of dimensions increased from 3 to 4 in the original version (respect for the individual, reasonable care, distributive justice, maintaining of patients’ confidentiality). The total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.821.

Humanistic care ability inventory

Nursing humanistic care ability was designed by American scholar Nkongho [20] in 1990, with a total of 37 items, including 3 dimensions of knowing, courage, and patience. The scale was scored using a 7-point Likert scale, with each item ranging from 1 to 7 points, 7 points for “completely agree” and 1 point for “completely disagree”, with 13 items requiring reverse scoring. The total score ranged from 37 to 259, with higher scores indicating greater humanistic care ability. A scale score > 210.53 is a high level, 171.55-210.53 is a moderate level, and a score < 171.55 is a low level [21].Xujuan carried out the translation and sinicization, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.84, indicating good internal consistency [22]. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha value was 0.79.

Procedure

The researchers used the “Questionnaire Star” platform to send a link to an electronic questionnaire to the college counselors of the three universities via WeChat (the most commonly used social media in China). College counselors were asked to forward the questionnaire to their students. At the same time, all undergraduate nursing students used WeChat and had access to the e-questionnaire, with each IP address allowed to be filled only once. An informed consent form consisting of an explanation of the purpose of the study and the survey process, a promise of anonymity, and voluntary participation was sent to participants via WeChat. After completing the data collection, we reviewed all questionnaires to exclude invalid ones. The specific exclusion criteria were (1) identical answers across all questions; (2) questionnaires submitted within 3  minutes(questionnaires take approximately 5–10 min to fill out); (3) responses that showed a regular pattern.

Ethics requirements

This study follows the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki and adheres to the Measures of the Ethical Review of Life Science and Medical Research Involving Humans. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the School of Nursing at Guangdong Pharmaceutical University. Each participant gave informed consent before the start of the study, participation was completely voluntary, and the confidentiality and anonymity of participants were ensured.

Data analysis

Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 27.0. categorical data (gender, grade, etc.) were described by number and percentage, and continuous data were described by mean and standard deviation. Comparisons between groups were made using two independent samples t-tests or one-way analysis of variance. Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of ethical sensitivity.

Results

General information characteristics

A total of 727 questionnaires were collected in this study, among which 71 were excluded due to invalidity, leaving 656 valid responses, with an effective rate of 90.23%. Table 1 describes the demographic characteristics of the participants. 257 freshmen (39.2%), 114 sophomores (17.4%), 128 juniors (19.5%), and 157 seniors (23.9%) were among the participants. Regarding the gender distribution, the majority were female students (n = 581, 88.6%). Furthermore, 282 undergraduate nursing students had experience learning nursing ethics (43.0%), and 344 had experience caring for patients (52.4%). Details are presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Demographic characteristics of participants (N = 656)
Characteristics
 
N
%
Gender
Male
75
11.4%
Female
581
88.6%
Grade
Freshman
257
39.2%
Sophomore
114
17.4%
Junior
128
19.5%
Senior
157
23.9%
Residence
Urban
302
46.0%
Rural
354
54.0%
Family with only child
Yes
109
16.6%
Religious
Yes
26
4.0%
Political Status
Party Member
20
3.0%
Members
453
69.1%
Masses
183
27.9%
Student positions
Yes
204
31.1%
Participation in voluntary activities
Often
153
23.3%
Sometimes
465
70.9%
Seldom
38
5.8%
Relationship with parents
Good
482
73.5%
General
154
23.5%
Bad
20
3.0%
The way of choosing nursing major at admission
Voluntary
186
28.4%
Involuntary
470
71.6%
Attitudes towards being a nursing major
Like
422
64.3%
Moderate
165
25.2%
Dislike
69
10.5%
Willingness to work in nursing
Would
476
72.6%
Doesn’t matter
103
15.7%
Reluctant
77
11.7%
Experience in learning nursing ethics
Yes
282
43.0%
Experience of caring for patients (including sick relatives)
Yes
344
52.4%

Ethical sensitivity

The average ethical sensitivity score of 656 Chinese undergraduate nursing students was (36.01 ± 6.31) and the mean score for each item was (2.65 ± 0.49). The scores for each dimension were respect for individuals (10.11 ± 2.45), distributive justice (8.20 ± 2.13),reasonable care (11.42 ± 2.37), and maintaining patients’ confidentiality (6.28 ± 1.51). Based on the scores of each item, the rankings from highest to lowest are maintaining patients’ confidentiality (3.14 ± 0.75), reasonable care (2.86 ± 0.59), distributive justice (2.73 ± 0.71), and respect for individuals (2.53 ± 0.61). Details are presented in (Table 2).

Humanistic care ability

The total average score of humanistic care ability of undergraduate nursing students was (189.16 ± 18.40) with an average score for each item (5.11 ± 0.50). The three dimensions scores were knowing (72.03 ± 7.72), courage (60.59 ± 9.32), and patience (56.54 ± 5.83). Details are presented in (Table 2).
Table 2
Descriptive statistics of study variables (N = 656)
Variables
Scale item number
Total subscale(\(\:\stackrel{-}{\text{x}}\pm\:\text{s}\))
Each item(\(\:\stackrel{-}{\text{x}}\pm\:\text{s}\))
Ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students (ESQ-NS)
13
36.01 ± 6.31
2.65 ± 0.47
Respect for individuals
4
10.11 ± 2.45
2.53 ± 0.61
Reasonable care
4
11.42 ± 2.37
2.86 ± 0.59
Distributive justice
3
8.20 ± 2.13
2.73 ± 0.71
Maintaining patients’ confidentiality
2
6.28 ± 1.51
3.14 ± 0.75
Humanistic care ability(CAI)
37
189.16 ± 18.40
5.11 ± 0.50
Knowing
14
72.03 ± 7.72
5.15 ± 0.55
Courage
13
60.59 ± 9.32
4.66 ± 0.72
Patience
10
56.54 ± 5.83
5.65 ± 0.58

Relationship between ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability

The results of Pearson’s correlation analysis show a moderate positive correlation between the total score of ethical sensitivity and the total score of humanistic care ability of undergraduate nursing students (Table 3), with a correlation coefficient of 0.426 (P < 0.01).
Table 3
Correlation coefficients between ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability among nursing students(N = 656)
Variables
ESQ-NS
Respect for individuals
Reasonable care
Distributive justice
Maintaining patients’ confidentiality
CAI
0.426**
0.399**
0.369**
0.247**
0.206**
Knowing
0.419**
0.391**
0.333**
0.250**
0.243**
Courage
0.365**
0.355**
0.309**
0.211**
0.169**
Patience
0.206**
0.173**
0.231**
0.112**
0.059
ESQ-NS: Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire For Nursing Students; CAI: Humanistic Caring Ability; **P < 0.01

Univariate analysis of factors influencing ethical sensitivity

An independent samples t-test (for binary variables) or one-way analysis of variance (for multiple categorical variables) was run on the 14 variables in the general information questionnaire with the total score of ethical sensitivity. The findings indicated that grade, political status, participation in voluntary activities, relationship with parents, liking of the nursing profession, willingness to work in nursing, experience in learning nursing ethics, and experience of caring for patients had a statistically significant effect on the results. Detailed results are shown in (Table 4).
Table 4
Total ESQ-NS scores of associated background characteristics
 
Variables
 
Mean ± SD
t/F
P
Grade
Freshman
 
32.64 ± 5.84
63.79 b
< 0.001
Sophomore
 
36.17 ± 5.82
Junior
 
37.58 ± 6.17
Senior
 
40.14 ± 4.21
Political status
Party Member
40.5 ± 4.97
6.98 b
0.001
Members
 
36.16 ± 6.36
Masses
 
35.16 ± 6.11
Participation in voluntary activities
Often
 
36.17 ± 6.80
5.97 b
0.003
Sometimes
 
36.24 ± 6.05
Seldom
 
32.61 ± 6.57
Relationship with parents
Good
 
36.79 ± 6.26
16.94 b
< 0.001
General
 
34.19 ± 6.04
Bad
 
31.10 ± 4.40
Attitudes towards being a nursing major
Like
 
36.81 ± 5.98
14.86 b
< 0.001
Moderate
 
35.38 ± 6.88
Dislike
 
32.61 ± 5.58
Willingness to work in nursing
Like
 
37.01 ± 6.12
24.61 b
< 0.001
Moderate
 
34.05 ± 6.22
Dislike
 
32.48 ± 5.74
 
Experience in learning nursing ethics
Yes
 
38.71 ± 5.33
10.24 a
< 0.001
No
 
33.98 ± 6.23
Experience of caring for patients (including sick relatives)
Yes
 
38.3 ± 5.94
10.53 a
< 0.001
No
 
33.49 ± 5.73
a Independent t-test; b One-way ANOVA

Analysis of multiple linear results

The overall score of ethical sensitivity was used as the dependent variable, and the statistically significant items of the one-way analysis of variance were used as the independent variables in a multiple linear regression. The results showed that grade, relationship with parents, attitudes towards being a nursing major, willingness to work in nursing, experience in learning nursing ethics, experience in caring for patients, and overall CAI score were the main influencing factors of ethical sensitivity. Detailed results are shown in (Table 5).
Table 5
Multivariate regression analyses of ethical sensitivity in nursing students
Variables
Unstandardized coefficients(B)(95% CI)
SE
Standardized
coefficients(β)
t
Sig.
Grade
3.176(2.397,3.955)
0.397
0.610
8.002
< 0.001
Relationship with parents
-2.364(-3.170, -1.558)
0.411
-0.195
-5.757
< 0.001
How much you like nursing major
1.116(0.177,2.054)
0.478
0.120
2.334
0.02
Willingness to work in nursing
-2.157(-3.065, -1.249)
0.463
-0.235
-4.664
< 0.001
Learned knowledge related to nursing ethics
2.873(1.089,4.657))
0.909
0.226
3.162
0.002
Experience of caring for patients (such as sick relatives)
-1.878(-2.730, -1.027)
0.434
-0.149
-4.332
< 0.001
Humanistic care ability
0.038(0.011,0.064)
0.014
0.109
2.732
0.006
R2 = 0.388; adjusted R2 = 0.381

Discussion

Undergraduate nursing students’ current levels of ethical sensitivity

Overall scores for undergraduate nursing students

This study shows that the ethical sensitivity of undergraduate nursing students is at a moderate level, slightly lower than Hujuan’s study, but the scores of sophomore, junior, and senior students in this study are slightly higher [12]. This is due to a combination of factors related to the research population and clinical practice experience. Firstly, the participants in this study included first-year nursing students who were new to the field of nursing and had not yet been trained in a professional nursing program. Knowledge and awareness of ethical issues were still in the preliminary stages, resulting in a lower level of ethical sensitivity than that of the higher grades. Secondly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, to avoid the risk of infection among students, all universities in China suspended traditional face-to-face classroom instruction, including undergraduate nursing students who transitioned to online learning modes. Due to the implementation of strict epidemic prevention and isolation measures, first to third-year undergraduate nursing students were unable to obtain clinical placements, limiting their learning primarily to theoretical aspects. For fourth-year students, their planned clinical internships and rotations, which typically last at least eight months, were also disrupted due to the pandemic [23]. Although virtual simulation teaching technologies were introduced to compensate for the lack of hands-on experience, studies have shown that remote learning cannot fully replace direct interaction with patients, which to some extent restricts the development of practical skills and ultimately affects students’ comprehensive learning experience and the formation and development of ethical sensitivity [24]. Lee et al. point out that when using virtual simulation equipment to mimic clinical scenarios, students often feel that the process is time-consuming and confusing [25]. With the effective control of the COVID-19 outbreak in China in 2022, the teaching activities of undergraduate nursing programs gradually returned to traditional face-to-face modes, allowing students across all years to re-enter hospital environments and engage directly with patients to continue their clinical placements and internships. This shift not only helps students gain necessary clinical experiences but also deepens their understanding of nursing ethics through firsthand encounters with patient needs and suffering, thereby promoting the enhancement of their ethical sensitivity.

Scores of undergraduate nursing students on each of the different dimensions

According to our research findings, the scores for the dimensions of ethical sensitivity among nursing students are similar to those reported by Xia [26]. Nowadays, with the continuous application and development of big data, the internet of things, cloud computing, and other artificial intelligence technologies, these advancements have brought convenience to people’s lives while also posing risks to the protection of personal privacy information. It is a simple matter for healthcare professionals to have direct access to patient-related data, which contains a lot of sensitive content. Once healthcare professionals fail to comply with relevant laws and regulations, resulting in the leakage of patients’ private information, it will directly violate patients’ privacy rights and may also cause additional psychological burdens for the patients, leading to a decrease in trust within the nurse-patient relationship. Protecting patient privacy is both a legal requirement and a professional ethical requirement for healthcare personnel, and it is also the foundation for building a good nurse-patient relationship [27]. For the reasons listed above, nursing colleges and hospitals have been enhancing privacy education for nursing students in recent years, which has raised the students’ awareness of protecting patients’ privacy.
Respect for individuals dimension scored the lowest. This may be due to the differences between Eastern and Western cultures. Eastern culture is based on collectivism and family-centered values, while Western culture is rooted in individualism, placing greater emphasis on personal choice and individual rights [28]. Secondly, under the background of traditional Chinese culture, nursing students tend to passively accept knowledge transmitted by teachers rather than actively ask questions or express personal insights, lacking initiative and critical thinking [29]. Due to biases resulting from students’ personal experiences, their perceptions of patients and the nurse-patient interaction may be limited. Some students could behave disrespectfully and treat patients unfairly by remaining silent or by passively supporting their rights. This indicates that nursing ethics education needs to strengthen the curriculum on the principle of respect. Additionally, there needs to be a shift from traditional teaching methods, focusing on a student-centered approach and combining flipped classroom techniques and debate-style ethics teaching to enhance students’ initiative and engagement [30, 31].

Undergraduate nursing students’ ethical sensitivity is positively correlated with humanistic care ability

The study analysis indicated that the humanistic caring score of undergraduate nursing students was at a moderate level, consistent with Wang’s findings [32]. Correlation analysis revealed a moderate positive correlation between ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability, which is consistent with Hujuan’s study [12]. With the shift in medical paradigms, nursing education in our country has gradually begun to emphasize humanities education. However, due to its late start, this development remains immature. Research shows that humanities and caring courses in Chinese nursing schools account for only 8% of the total curriculum, far below the 15–25% seen in countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany [33], which affects the formation of nursing students’ humanistic caring abilities to some extent. Due to the tendency in traditional Chinese culture to express emotions in a reserved and subtle manner, this may limit the application of humanistic caring in nursing practice, leading to insufficient proficiency among nursing students in expressing care and effective communication. The results of multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the capacity for humanistic care had a significant impact on ethical sensitivity. In addition to being essential for building a positive nurse-patient rapport, humanistic care skills are also critical for enhancing the nursing profession’s professional ethical literacy. Nonetheless, Chinese nursing students possess a high degree of nursing expertise but also have various shortcomings when it comes to providing humanistic care [34]. This suggests that to increase the ethical sensitivity of undergraduate nursing students, nursing educators should incorporate humanities education into nursing education and strengthen the integration of humanism and the nursing scientific spirit.

Elements influencing undergraduate nursing students’ ethical sensitivity

Grade

Senior nursing students show higher ethical sensitivity than juniors, as found by Park [9] and Muramatsu [18]. However, Baykara et al. [35] reported that students’ ethical sensitivity decreases with increasing educational years. The discrepancies in these results might be attributed to various factors impacting training, including the classroom environment, educational features, the level of preparedness, and the research tools utilized in the studies [36]. Therefore, it is essential to focus on the significant role of education and the implementation of effective ethical teaching strategies to enhance students’ ethical sensitivity. In future nursing education, nursing ethics courses should be introduced as early as possible, and it is suggested to divide them into two stages to optimize teaching effectiveness [37, 38]. The initial phase of the course should focus on the foundational knowledge of ethics to ensure that students establish a solid theoretical foundation. As students progress into clinical practice, the course content should shift towards practical applications. Additionally, integrating virtual patient scenarios generated by ChatGPT can help students develop their ability to address ethical challenges in real-world situations [39].

Relationship with parents

According to our results, the level of ethical sensitivity is influenced by the relationship between nursing students and their parents. The creation of moral judgments, behavioral patterns, and moral development is significantly influenced by an individual’s home environment [40]. In a healthy and harmonious family, family members tend to maintain mutual support, respect, understanding, and stable emotional connections. The moral consciousness of the individual strengthens, and their level of morality and responsibility is raised in this familial setting. People are conditioned to care more for others, be more willing to collaborate, adopt socially responsible behavior, and apply their internalized values to real-world decisions and actions. Moreover, an individual’s understanding of moral ethics requires certain emotional experiences. In a harmonious family atmosphere, emotions develop more healthily, leading to sharper intuitive responses to moral issues [41]. College counselors should proactively understand students’ living conditions and family environments, and encourage open and honest communication between parents and students. Additionally, nursing ethics education can be enhanced through case-based teaching methods combined with role-playing and reflective journals to strengthen students’ sense of responsibility and empathy skills [42].

Attitudes towards being a nursing major

Students who selected a liking to the nursing major showed higher ethical sensitivity scores than those who selected a disliking the nursing major, which is similar to the findings of Akca [43]. Interest, as a form of intrinsic motivation, plays a crucial role in driving individual behavior [44]. Students who are passionate about nursing usually choose the profession out of a desire to care for and help others. During their studies, they typically possess a strong intrinsic motivation, which not only drives them to choose nursing as a career path but also makes them more proactive and focused in their daily learning and practice [45]. In the process of interacting with patients, one can always pay attention to their needs. When faced with ethical issues, they are better equipped to identify potential ethical conflicts and seek appropriate solutions. Therefore, nursing educators should pay attention to the psychological state of students during the learning process and provide them with the necessary support and counseling to help them cope with the stress and challenges of learning. Research has found that mindfulness practices, guided imagery, and meditation can help alleviate anxiety among nursing students during their studies [46]. At the same time, nursing educators should also stimulate students’ enthusiasm for the profession through diverse teaching methods, such as education based on learning styles and metaverse-based learning methods [47, 48].

Willingness to work in nursing

Students who are willing to work in nursing have higher ethical sensitivity scores, likely due to their higher level of professional identity and positive professional values. A strong sense of professional identity is crucial for nursing students to develop into confident, successful, and resilient healthcare professionals. Research shows that nursing students with a strong professional identity exhibit more positive attitudes toward their future careers [49]. According to Eckard et al. [50], nursing students with positive professional values have better clinical performance, a clearer perception of the ethical challenges of nursing, and a clearer understanding of applying positive strategies to resolve ethical conflicts. There is a positive correlation between professional values and ethical sensitivity among undergraduate nursing students [51]. This suggests that the process of nursing education involves not only imparting subject knowledge but also guiding students in enhancing their professional identity and professional values. The study found that the ethics laboratory program has a positive impact on the professional values of nursing students, providing valuable references for the design of nursing curricula [52].

Experiences in learning nursing ethics

According to this study, 43.0% of undergraduate nursing students had attended a nursing ethics course, and those who had showed a higher level of ethical sensitivity than those who had not. The courses provide systematic ethical theoretical knowledge, enhance students’ critical thinking abilities and practical experience through case analysis and simulated practices. In addition, the courses promote self-reflection and the formation of professional identity, enabling students to better identify and resolve ethical issues. The study found that nursing students possess a certain level of ethical sensitivity from the outset, and this sensitivity can be further developed through comprehensive nursing education [53]. Thankfully, nursing ethics education has become a required specialty course for undergraduate nursing students in China, which will help to raise the ethical sensitivity of the students. In terms of curriculum design, existing studies have shown the value of teaching methods such as inquiry-oriented teaching [54], debate-based teaching [30], simulation-based teaching [55], problem-based learning, and reflective practice [56] in nursing ethics education. Research indicates that using instructional strategies that cater to three distinct learning styles can significantly increase students’ capacity for making ethical decisions and enhance their sensitivity to ethical issues [57],. Educators can create a digital, personalized, interactive educational approach, closely integrating ethics education with practical teaching, and encourage students’ interest and initiative in learning by combining contemporary technological tools like virtual reality technology and online courses.

Experience of caring for patients

The experience of caring for patients is also an important factor influencing the ethical sensitivity of undergraduate nursing students. In the process of caring for sick family members, individuals need to continuously monitor the patient’s physical condition and psychological fluctuations, while integrating their personal emotions, care, warmth, and empathy into daily caregiving [58]. Therefore, when faced with ethical dilemmas, these individuals tend to be better at considering issues from others’ perspectives and engaging in effective communication and understanding. Empathy is a crucial element in providing high-quality nursing care and is considered one of the most closely related core factors to humanistic concern [15]. Research indicates that there is a significant positive correlation between the level of empathy and ethical sensitivity among Chinese nursing students [59]. This suggests that students with higher levels of empathy tend to exhibit greater ethical sensitivity, allowing them to pay closer attention to the physical and emotional needs of patients in clinical practice. Similarly, research has found that medical students with higher ethical sensitivity usually possess stronger empathy [60]. These students can more acutely identify patients’ issues and deeply understand their suffering, enabling them to take timely and appropriate actions from the patients’ perspective to resolve problems and reduce the occurrence of conflicts between healthcare providers and patients [61]. This suggests that nursing education should focus on cultivating students’ empathy to enhance their capacity for humanistic care and improve their ethical sensitivity. Existing research shows that narrative medicine [62] and Balint groups [63] have positive effects on cultivating empathy in nursing students.

Limitations of the study

This study has some limitations. Firstly, the study was conducted in only three colleges in Guangdong Province, China, which limits its generalizability. Future studies could expand the range of samples to include nursing students from more regions and at different educational levels to explore the current status of ethical sensitivity among nursing students. Secondly, the cross-sectional design of this study made it difficult to completely understand the students’ perceptions of ethical sensitivity, and the types of influencing factors that were identified were not comprehensive enough. It is suggested that future studies may use qualitative and mixed research methods combined with longitudinal observation methods to further consider the role of other relevant factors in nursing students’ ethical sensitivity.

Conclusion

Chinese undergraduate nursing students’ ethical sensitivity is at a moderate level, but there is still room for improvement. Ethical sensitivity is moderate positively related to humanistic care delivery. Future nursing educators are urged to explore various methods of teaching nursing ethics, make the most of international advanced nursing ethics teaching experiences, and incorporate humanistic care education with China’s actual condition. Take into account the unique characteristics of nursing students while creating interventions to increase their ethical awareness.

Acknowledgements

The authors are deeply grateful to the faculty members of the schools who cooperated with us and to the undergraduate nursing students who participated in this study.

Declarations

The Research Ethics Committee of the School of Nursing at Guangdong Pharmaceutical University reviewed the study and granted approval for its conduct. Adhering to the ethical guidelines, protocols, and regulations outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and the Measures of the Ethical Review of Life Science and Medical Research Involving Humans, the study ensured that informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortiz MR. Patient-centered care: nursing knowledge and policy. Nurs Sci Q. 2018;31(3):291–5.PubMedCrossRef Ortiz MR. Patient-centered care: nursing knowledge and policy. Nurs Sci Q. 2018;31(3):291–5.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hongzhen X, Changrong Y, Yuanyuan S, Xinqing Z. Interpretation of the content of the ethical code for nurses in China. Chin Med Ethics. 2020;33(10):1234–42. Hongzhen X, Changrong Y, Yuanyuan S, Xinqing Z. Interpretation of the content of the ethical code for nurses in China. Chin Med Ethics. 2020;33(10):1234–42.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fry ST, Johnstone MJ. Ethics in Nursing Practice: A Guide to Ethical Decision Making. In: 2013; 2013. Fry ST, Johnstone MJ. Ethics in Nursing Practice: A Guide to Ethical Decision Making. In: 2013; 2013.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Haahr A, Norlyk A, Martinsen B, Dreyer P. Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: a review. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27(1):258–72.PubMedCrossRef Haahr A, Norlyk A, Martinsen B, Dreyer P. Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: a review. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27(1):258–72.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rest JR, Walker LJ. Development in judging Moral issues. Am J Educ. 1979;28(1):237–48. Rest JR, Walker LJ. Development in judging Moral issues. Am J Educ. 1979;28(1):237–48.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lutzen K, Dahlqvist V, Eriksson S, Norberg A. Developing the concept of moral sensitivity in health care practice. Nurs Ethics. 2006;13(2):187–96.PubMedCrossRef Lutzen K, Dahlqvist V, Eriksson S, Norberg A. Developing the concept of moral sensitivity in health care practice. Nurs Ethics. 2006;13(2):187–96.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeom HA, Ahn SH, Kim SJ. Effects of ethics education on moral sensitivity of nursing students. Nurs Ethics. 2017;24(6):644–52.PubMedCrossRef Yeom HA, Ahn SH, Kim SJ. Effects of ethics education on moral sensitivity of nursing students. Nurs Ethics. 2017;24(6):644–52.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ergin E, Kocak Uyaroglu A, Altinel B. Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and ethical sensitivity in Turkish nursing students. J Bioeth Inq. 2022;19(2):341–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ergin E, Kocak Uyaroglu A, Altinel B. Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and ethical sensitivity in Turkish nursing students. J Bioeth Inq. 2022;19(2):341–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Park M, Kjervik D, Crandell J, Oermann MH. The relationship of ethics education to moral sensitivity and moral reasoning skills of nursing students. Nurs Ethics. 2012;19(4):568–80.PubMedCrossRef Park M, Kjervik D, Crandell J, Oermann MH. The relationship of ethics education to moral sensitivity and moral reasoning skills of nursing students. Nurs Ethics. 2012;19(4):568–80.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Borhani F, Abbaszadeh A, Hoseinabadi-Farahani MJ. Moral sensitivity and its dimensions in Iranian nursing students. J Med Ethics History Med. 2016;9:19. Borhani F, Abbaszadeh A, Hoseinabadi-Farahani MJ. Moral sensitivity and its dimensions in Iranian nursing students. J Med Ethics History Med. 2016;9:19.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Juan YM. Hunan Research Progres on nursing students ethieal sensitivily. J Nurs Seience. 2023;38(05):117–20. Hu Juan YM. Hunan Research Progres on nursing students ethieal sensitivily. J Nurs Seience. 2023;38(05):117–20.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu J, Chen X, Khoshnood K, Luo E, Muramatsu T, Yang M. A survey of ethical sensitivity among nursing students and its influencing factors. Nurs Ethics 2024:11:9697330231225399. Hu J, Chen X, Khoshnood K, Luo E, Muramatsu T, Yang M. A survey of ethical sensitivity among nursing students and its influencing factors. Nurs Ethics 2024:11:9697330231225399.
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Riahi S, Thomson G, Duxbury J. An integrative review exploring decision-making factors influencing mental health nurses in the use of restraint. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016;23(2):116–28.PubMedCrossRef Riahi S, Thomson G, Duxbury J. An integrative review exploring decision-making factors influencing mental health nurses in the use of restraint. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016;23(2):116–28.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Watson J. Nursing:the Philosophy and Science of Caring. University Press of Colorado; 2008. Watson J. Nursing:the Philosophy and Science of Caring. University Press of Colorado; 2008.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylan S, Ozkan I, Sahin G. Caring behaviors, moral sensitivity, and emotional intelligence in intensive care nurses: a descriptive study. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021;57(2):734–46.PubMedCrossRef Taylan S, Ozkan I, Sahin G. Caring behaviors, moral sensitivity, and emotional intelligence in intensive care nurses: a descriptive study. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021;57(2):734–46.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendall S, Stuart A, Ord J. Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics. J Roy Stat Soc. 1995;90:398. Kendall S, Stuart A, Ord J. Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics. J Roy Stat Soc. 1995;90:398.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Muramatsu T, Nakamura M, Okada E, Katayama H, Ojima T. The development and validation of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):215.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Muramatsu T, Nakamura M, Okada E, Katayama H, Ojima T. The development and validation of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):215.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu H, Tong T, Gao Y, Zhang H, Tong H, Liang C. Reliability and validity evaluation of the Chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):244.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yu H, Tong T, Gao Y, Zhang H, Tong H, Liang C. Reliability and validity evaluation of the Chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):244.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nkongho N. Measurement of nursing outcomes the Caring ability inventory. Springer Publishing Co 1990: (3–16). Nkongho N. Measurement of nursing outcomes the Caring ability inventory. Springer Publishing Co 1990: (3–16).
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu C. Caring ability among Chinese nursing students: a cross-sectional study and educational intervention. Southern Medical University; 2017. Yu C. Caring ability among Chinese nursing students: a cross-sectional study and educational intervention. Southern Medical University; 2017.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Juan X, ilan LIY. Investigation and analysis of nursing staff’s caring ability. J Nurs Sci 2008. Juan X, ilan LIY. Investigation and analysis of nursing staff’s caring ability. J Nurs Sci 2008.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Song M, Zhang L, Ji Q, Ji P, Xu J, Chen Y, Guo L. Nursing students’ emotions, educational concerns, and the impact of study careers and professional futures during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):278.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Song M, Zhang L, Ji Q, Ji P, Xu J, Chen Y, Guo L. Nursing students’ emotions, educational concerns, and the impact of study careers and professional futures during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):278.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Curcio F, González CIA, Zicchi M, Sole G, Finco G, Ez zinabi O, Melo P, Galletta M, Martinez-Riera JR. COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. 2022, 19(14):8347. Curcio F, González CIA, Zicchi M, Sole G, Finco G, Ez zinabi O, Melo P, Galletta M, Martinez-Riera JR. COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. 2022, 19(14):8347.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Choi J, Kim J, Lee K. The relationship between On-Site clinical practice, nursing Professional Value, and nursing clinical self-efficacy during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study. J Multidisciplinary Healthc. 2023;16:4163–72.CrossRef Lee J, Choi J, Kim J, Lee K. The relationship between On-Site clinical practice, nursing Professional Value, and nursing clinical self-efficacy during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study. J Multidisciplinary Healthc. 2023;16:4163–72.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Xia Y, Chen Q, Zeng L, Guo Q, Liu H, Fan S, Huang H. Factors associated with the patient privacy protection behaviours of nursing interns in China: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022;65:103479.PubMedCrossRef Xia Y, Chen Q, Zeng L, Guo Q, Liu H, Fan S, Huang H. Factors associated with the patient privacy protection behaviours of nursing interns in China: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022;65:103479.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonomi L, Jiang X, Ohno-Machado L. Protecting patient privacy in survival analyses. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019;27(3):366–75.PubMedCentralCrossRef Bonomi L, Jiang X, Ohno-Machado L. Protecting patient privacy in survival analyses. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019;27(3):366–75.PubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat LI Bin CZ. Commonalities and essential differences between Chinese-Style Modernization and Western Modernization from a civilizational perspective. Chin J Eur Stud. 2023;41(03):1–18. LI Bin CZ. Commonalities and essential differences between Chinese-Style Modernization and Western Modernization from a civilizational perspective. Chin J Eur Stud. 2023;41(03):1–18.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Li S, Wei W, Li X, Ma L, Li Q, Sun X, Chen X. Impacts of blended learning with BOPPPS model on Chinese medical undergraduate students: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 44 studies. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):914.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Li S, Wei W, Li X, Ma L, Li Q, Sun X, Chen X. Impacts of blended learning with BOPPPS model on Chinese medical undergraduate students: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 44 studies. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):914.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim WJ, Park JH. The effects of debate-based ethics education on the moral sensitivity and judgment of nursing students: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;83:104200.PubMedCrossRef Kim WJ, Park JH. The effects of debate-based ethics education on the moral sensitivity and judgment of nursing students: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;83:104200.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Barranquero-Herbosa M, Abajas-Bustillo R, Ortego-Maté C. Effectiveness of flipped classroom in nursing education: a systematic review of systematic and integrative reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022;135:104327.PubMedCrossRef Barranquero-Herbosa M, Abajas-Bustillo R, Ortego-Maté C. Effectiveness of flipped classroom in nursing education: a systematic review of systematic and integrative reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022;135:104327.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Zhang Y, Liu M, Zhou L, Zhang J, Tao H, Li X. Research on the formation of humanistic care ability in nursing students: a structural equation approach. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;86:104315.PubMedCrossRef Wang Y, Zhang Y, Liu M, Zhou L, Zhang J, Tao H, Li X. Research on the formation of humanistic care ability in nursing students: a structural equation approach. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;86:104315.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu QYM, Shen X. Review on caring ability of nursing students. Nurs Res. 2018;32(23):3664–7. Liu QYM, Shen X. Review on caring ability of nursing students. Nurs Res. 2018;32(23):3664–7.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen L, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Shan J, Zeng L. Exploration and practice of humanistic education for medical students based on volunteerism. Med Educ Online. 2023;28(1):2182691.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chen L, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Shan J, Zeng L. Exploration and practice of humanistic education for medical students based on volunteerism. Med Educ Online. 2023;28(1):2182691.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Eyüboğlu G, Göçmen Baykara Z, Çalışkan N, Eyikara E, Doğan N, Aydoğan S, Uçaner Çifdalöz B, Özyıldız A, Gündüz CS, Cihan Erdoğan B, et al. Effect of music therapy on nursing students’ first objective structured clinical exams, anxiety levels and vital signs: a randomized controlled study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;97:104687.PubMedCrossRef Eyüboğlu G, Göçmen Baykara Z, Çalışkan N, Eyikara E, Doğan N, Aydoğan S, Uçaner Çifdalöz B, Özyıldız A, Gündüz CS, Cihan Erdoğan B, et al. Effect of music therapy on nursing students’ first objective structured clinical exams, anxiety levels and vital signs: a randomized controlled study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;97:104687.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyu Y, Liang X, Li J, Chi C. Assessment of ethical sensitivity in nursing students: tools, trends, and implications. Nurs Ethics 2024:9697330241295375. Lyu Y, Liang X, Li J, Chi C. Assessment of ethical sensitivity in nursing students: tools, trends, and implications. Nurs Ethics 2024:9697330241295375.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiang BBCMHXXCL. The current status and influencing factors of ethical sensitivity of nursing student. Chin J Nurs Educ. 2024;21(02):183–8. Qiang BBCMHXXCL. The current status and influencing factors of ethical sensitivity of nursing student. Chin J Nurs Educ. 2024;21(02):183–8.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Jahangasht Ghoozlu K, Vanaki Z, Mohammad Khan Kermanshahi S. Ethics education: nurse educators’ main concern and their teaching strategies. Nurs Ethics. 2023;30(7–8):1083–94.PubMedCrossRef Jahangasht Ghoozlu K, Vanaki Z, Mohammad Khan Kermanshahi S. Ethics education: nurse educators’ main concern and their teaching strategies. Nurs Ethics. 2023;30(7–8):1083–94.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu J, Liu F, Fang J, Liu S. The application of Chat Generative pre-trained transformer in nursing education. Nurs Outlook. 2023;71(6):102064.PubMedCrossRef Liu J, Liu F, Fang J, Liu S. The application of Chat Generative pre-trained transformer in nursing education. Nurs Outlook. 2023;71(6):102064.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Bornstein MH, Yu J, Putnick DL. Prospective associations between mothers’ and fathers’ parenting styles and adolescents’ moral values: Stability and specificity by parent style and adolescent gender. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2022;2022(185–186):9–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bornstein MH, Yu J, Putnick DL. Prospective associations between mothers’ and fathers’ parenting styles and adolescents’ moral values: Stability and specificity by parent style and adolescent gender. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2022;2022(185–186):9–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Jun D. Effect of family environment on preschool children’ moral sensitivity:the mediating role of empathy. China J Health Psychol. 2023;31(01):103–10. Jun D. Effect of family environment on preschool children’ moral sensitivity:the mediating role of empathy. China J Health Psychol. 2023;31(01):103–10.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee W, Choi S, Kim S, Min A. A case-centered Approach to nursing Ethics Education: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020, 17(21). Lee W, Choi S, Kim S, Min A. A case-centered Approach to nursing Ethics Education: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020, 17(21).
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Akça NK. Nuray Şimşek.: Moral Sensitivity among Senior Nursing Students in Turkey. 2017. Akça NK. Nuray Şimşek.: Moral Sensitivity among Senior Nursing Students in Turkey. 2017.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishbach A. K Woolley 2022 The structure of intrinsic motivation. 9 2022 9 339–63. Fishbach A. K Woolley 2022 The structure of intrinsic motivation. 9 2022 9 339–63.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Yardimci F, Bektaş M, Özkütük N, Muslu GK, Gerçeker G, Başbakkal Z. A study of the relationship between the study process, motivation resources, and motivation problems of nursing students in different educational systems. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;48:13–8.PubMedCrossRef Yardimci F, Bektaş M, Özkütük N, Muslu GK, Gerçeker G, Başbakkal Z. A study of the relationship between the study process, motivation resources, and motivation problems of nursing students in different educational systems. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;48:13–8.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy B, Trace A, O’Donovan M, Brady-Nevin C, Murphy M, O’Shea M, O’Regan P. Nursing and midwifery students’ stress and coping during their undergraduate education programmes: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;61:197–209.PubMedCrossRef McCarthy B, Trace A, O’Donovan M, Brady-Nevin C, Murphy M, O’Shea M, O’Regan P. Nursing and midwifery students’ stress and coping during their undergraduate education programmes: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;61:197–209.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Vizeshfar F, Torabizadeh C. The effect of teaching based on dominant learning style on nursing students’ academic achievement. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018;28:103–8.PubMedCrossRef Vizeshfar F, Torabizadeh C. The effect of teaching based on dominant learning style on nursing students’ academic achievement. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018;28:103–8.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee H, Yi Y, Moon W, Yeo JY. Exploring the potential use of the metaverse in nurse education through a mock trial. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;131:105974.PubMedCrossRef Lee H, Yi Y, Moon W, Yeo JY. Exploring the potential use of the metaverse in nurse education through a mock trial. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;131:105974.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu C, Palmer MH, Sha K. Professional identity and its influencing factors of first-year post-associate degree baccalaureate nursing students: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;84:104227.PubMedCrossRef Wu C, Palmer MH, Sha K. Professional identity and its influencing factors of first-year post-associate degree baccalaureate nursing students: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;84:104227.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Eckardt M, Lindfelt M. An analysis of nursing students’ ethical conflicts in a hospital. Nurs Ethics. 2019;26(7–8):2413–26.PubMedCrossRef Eckardt M, Lindfelt M. An analysis of nursing students’ ethical conflicts in a hospital. Nurs Ethics. 2019;26(7–8):2413–26.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen Q, Su X, Liu S, Miao K, Fang H. The relationship between moral sensitivity and professional values and ethical decision-making in nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;105:105056.PubMedCrossRef Chen Q, Su X, Liu S, Miao K, Fang H. The relationship between moral sensitivity and professional values and ethical decision-making in nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;105:105056.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Ertuğrul B, Arslan GG, Ayik C, Özden D. The effects of an ethics laboratory program on moral sensitivity and professional values in nursing students: a randomized controlled study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;111:105290.PubMedCrossRef Ertuğrul B, Arslan GG, Ayik C, Özden D. The effects of an ethics laboratory program on moral sensitivity and professional values in nursing students: a randomized controlled study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;111:105290.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Baykara ZG, Demir SG, Yaman S. The effect of ethics training on students recognizing ethical violations and developing moral sensitivity. Nurs Ethics. 2015;22(6):661–75.PubMedCrossRef Baykara ZG, Demir SG, Yaman S. The effect of ethics training on students recognizing ethical violations and developing moral sensitivity. Nurs Ethics. 2015;22(6):661–75.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang F, Zhao L, Zeng Y, Xu K, Wen X. A comparison of inquiry-oriented teaching and lecture-based approach in nursing ethics education. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;79:86–91.PubMedCrossRef Zhang F, Zhao L, Zeng Y, Xu K, Wen X. A comparison of inquiry-oriented teaching and lecture-based approach in nursing ethics education. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;79:86–91.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Sedgwick M, Yanicki S, Pijl EM. Analysis of undergraduate nursing students’ sensitivity to Microethical Dilemmas during Simulation. J Nurs Educ. 2020;59(2):88–92.PubMedCrossRef Sedgwick M, Yanicki S, Pijl EM. Analysis of undergraduate nursing students’ sensitivity to Microethical Dilemmas during Simulation. J Nurs Educ. 2020;59(2):88–92.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Zia T, Sabeghi H, Mahmoudirad G. Problem-based learning versus reflective practice on nursing students’ moral sensitivity. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):215.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zia T, Sabeghi H, Mahmoudirad G. Problem-based learning versus reflective practice on nursing students’ moral sensitivity. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):215.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HL, Huang SH, Huang CM. Evaluating the effect of three teaching strategies on student nurses’ moral sensitivity. Nurs Ethics. 2017;24(6):732–43.PubMedCrossRef Lee HL, Huang SH, Huang CM. Evaluating the effect of three teaching strategies on student nurses’ moral sensitivity. Nurs Ethics. 2017;24(6):732–43.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Guidi C, Traversa C. Empathy in patient care: from ‘Clinical Empathy’ to ‘Empathic concern’. Med Healthc Philos. 2021;24(4):573–85.CrossRef Guidi C, Traversa C. Empathy in patient care: from ‘Clinical Empathy’ to ‘Empathic concern’. Med Healthc Philos. 2021;24(4):573–85.CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu F, Zhou H, Yuan L, Cai Y. Effect of empathy competence on moral sensitivity in Chinese student nurses: the mediating role of emotional intelligence. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):483.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Liu F, Zhou H, Yuan L, Cai Y. Effect of empathy competence on moral sensitivity in Chinese student nurses: the mediating role of emotional intelligence. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):483.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuguero O, Esquerda M, Viñas J, Soler-Gonzalez J, Pifarré J. Ethics and empathy: the relationship between moral reasoning, ethical sensitivity and empathy in medical students. Rev Clin Esp. 2019;219(2):73–8.PubMedCrossRef Yuguero O, Esquerda M, Viñas J, Soler-Gonzalez J, Pifarré J. Ethics and empathy: the relationship between moral reasoning, ethical sensitivity and empathy in medical students. Rev Clin Esp. 2019;219(2):73–8.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Nazari AM, Borhani F, Zare-Kaseb A, Yousofvand V, Abbaszadeh A. The relationship between moral reasoning and nurses’ professional values in undergraduate nursing students: a descriptive-correlational study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):889.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nazari AM, Borhani F, Zare-Kaseb A, Yousofvand V, Abbaszadeh A. The relationship between moral reasoning and nurses’ professional values in undergraduate nursing students: a descriptive-correlational study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):889.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Xue M, Sun H, Xue J, Zhou J, Qu J, Ji S, Bu Y, Liu Y. Narrative medicine as a teaching strategy for nursing students to developing professionalism, empathy and humanistic caring ability: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Xue M, Sun H, Xue J, Zhou J, Qu J, Ji S, Bu Y, Liu Y. Narrative medicine as a teaching strategy for nursing students to developing professionalism, empathy and humanistic caring ability: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Gong B, Zhang X, Lu C, Wu C, Yang J. The effectiveness of Balint groups at improving empathy in medical and nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1089.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gong B, Zhang X, Lu C, Wu C, Yang J. The effectiveness of Balint groups at improving empathy in medical and nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1089.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Correlation between ethical sensitivity and humanistic care ability among undergraduate nursing students: a cross-sectional study
verfasst von
Yun Zhang
Sijia Li
Yanfang Huang
Congjing Song
Jiale Li
Weiqiang Chen
Yiling Yang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02532-5