What is behind the high turnover intention among hospital nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19 and the postpandemic era in China: a 2-wave multicentre cross-sectional comparison study
verfasst von:
Julan Xiao, Lili Liu, Yueming Peng, Xia Lyu, Chunfeng Xing, Yanling Tao, Shening Zhu, Aihuan Mai, Lijun Liang, Hongying Hu, Yi Fan, Weisi Peng, Haishan Xie, Jun Ren, Weixiang Luo
The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to the nursing profession, exacerbating occupational stress, attrition rates, and staffing shortages. Although prior studies have examined factors influencing nursing turnover intention, no research has compared turnover intention among Chinese hospital nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19 and the postpandemic era. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of turnover intention during these two critical periods.
Method
A 2-wave multicentre cross-sectional online survey was conducted in 25 hospitals in Guangdong, China. Data were collected during the full liberalization of COVID-19 (T1: 27 December 2022 to 7 January 2023, N = 1,766) and the postpandemic era (T2: 11 May to 23 May 2023, N = 2,643). A structured questionnaire was used to assess sociodemographic and work-related factors, such as perceived stress (10-item Perceived Stress Scale), depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire), anxiety (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder), insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index), intolerance of uncertainty (Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale), life satisfaction (Satisfaction with Life Scale), and turnover intention (Turnover Intention Scale). Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Pearson correlation, binary and multiple logistic regression, and hierarchical regression, were performed using SPSS 26.0.
Results
The prevalence rates of turnover intention were 73.33% and 72.34% at T1 and T2, respectively. Dissatisfaction with nursing work (aOR: 2.393–8.659, Ps < 0.001), lack of interest in nursing (aOR: 2.713–3.077, Ps < 0.001) and depression (aOR: 1.437–2.113, Ps < 0.05) were associated with an increased risk of turnover intention. In addition, life satisfaction (aOR: 0.282–0.687, Ps < 0.05) was associated with a reduced risk of turnover intention.
Conclusions
Turnover intention among hospital nurses remained alarmingly high during both the full liberalization of COVID-19 and the postpandemic era. Dissatisfaction with work, lack of interest in nursing, and depression were significant risk factors, whereas life satisfaction served as a protective factor. Early identification of turnover intention and targeted interventions are essential to address these challenges and improve nurse retention during and after public health crises.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact and poses a substantial threat to hospital nurses worldwide because of the exigency and uncertainty of the situation [1]. As the fight against the epidemic progresses, on December 27, 2022, the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (NHCPR) released a circular regarding further optimization of COVID-19 prevention and control measures and abruptly implemented a full-liberalization policy, eliminating daily nucleic acid testing or temperature screening for patients with COVID-19 infection [2]. In an extremely short and rapid period, the vast majority of people, including medical workers and the general public, became infected. Nevertheless, hospital nurses were compelled to confront challenges and hardships, such as the massive surge in the number of critically ill COVID-19 patients, and had to continue working even when they themselves were infected.
On May 5, 2023, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that COVID-19 is no longer a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC). Concurrently, the COVID-19 situation in China has transitioned to a state of sporadic, localized transmission, with the normal functioning of medical services nationwide and no large-scale outbreaks reported; this is referred to as the postpandemic era [3]. The transition of COVID-19 control measures marked a critical turning point in health care delivery and workforce management. Research has indicated that nurses are especially susceptible to physical and psychological problems resulting from excessive, high-intensity workloads and prolonged use of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic [4]. This, in turn, is associated with increased turnover intention [5].
Anzeige
Nurses constitute the largest proportion of hospital health care workers and play a vital role in the treatment, care, and management of patient disease progression during disease outbreaks, disasters, and emergency situations [4, 6]. Additionally, nurses have the closest contact with COVID-19 patients globally and spend more time attending to patients than other health care professionals do; thus, they are at risk of developing high-level stress and physical and psychological exhaustion [2]. Furthermore, evidence has indicated that nurses have experienced many deaths among critically ill COVID-19 patients, their relatives, and their colleagues, resulting in enormous psychological burdens [7]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a meta-analysis revealed that the overall prevalence rates of burnout, depression, anxiety, insomnia and psychological distress among health care workers were 37.4%, 31.8%, 34.4%, 27.8% and 46.1%, respectively [8]. After the sudden full spread of COVID-19, nurses experienced acute and aggravated psychological problems. A multicentre cross-sectional analysis during the full liberalization period of COVID-19 revealed that frontline nurses experienced turnover intentions (37.66%), depressive symptoms (69.20%), anxiety (62.51%) and insomnia (76.78%) [2]. More importantly, poor psychological health among nurses is a crucial predictor of turnover intention [9]. Given the shortage of nurses, exploring the factors associated with nurses’ turnover intentions and reducing turnover are essential issues that nursing managers and scholars need to pay attention to.
Turnover intention, which pertains to employees’ propensity to withdraw from their current positions and explore new prospects, is a critical predictor of turnover; however, it does not invariably translate into actual turnover [10]. Nurses are more prone to having higher turnover intentions than those in other professions. Research has shown that the proportion of hospital nurses with turnover intentions ranges from 20.2–56.1% [11], indicating that the nursing group is unstable and is in constant flux. Previous public health emergencies, such as SARS in 2003 and the recent COVID-19 pandemic, have significantly impacted healthcare workers’ turnover intentions. During the SARS outbreak, studies reported increased turnover rates among nurses [12]. Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for healthcare systems worldwide, potentially affecting nurses’ career decisions [13]. A cross-sectional study conducted during the normalization of the COVID-19 epidemic (between September 2020 and May 2021) in Guangdong Province, China, revealed that 64.5% of nurses had high and very high turnover intentions [13]. Furthermore, the State of the World Nursing 2020 announced that the global shortage of hospital nurses will reach 5.7 million by 2030, indicating that the high turnover rate of nurses will undoubtedly pose a formidable challenge to the Chinese health care system [14]. Given these concerning trends and their potential implications for healthcare delivery, continuous monitoring of nurses’ turnover intentions in the post-pandemic era becomes increasingly critical for developing effective retention strategies and maintaining healthcare workforce stability.
Currently, abundant evidence has demonstrated that turnover intention is the direct antecedent of turnover behaviour, which strongly predicts actual turnover [15]. Turnover intention can significantly impede progress in one’s nursing career. Frequent nurse turnover has numerous negative effects on nursing work quality, patient outcomes, and medical organization stability, among other factors; this may give rise to emotional instability and slack conduct among other nurses within the organization and exacerbate the potentially high costs for hospitals in terms of new staff recruitment, hiring, and training [16], especially in the remote and poverty-stricken rural areas of China, where there is a shortage of hospital nursing staff [17]. The loss of experienced nurses, especially those with specialized skills, can detrimentally affect the provision and continuity of nursing services, potentially leading to higher incidences of nursing-related adverse events and patient mortality [18]. Consequently, a deeper understanding of turnover intention facilitates decision-makers in taking preventive measures to curtail or even eliminate nurses’ turnover intention prior to actual turnover, thereby saving costs for the organization [15].
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevalence of turnover intentions among hospital nurses and nursing assistants was already substantial [19]. Nevertheless, as far as we are aware, there is minimal knowledge regarding turnover intention and its changing trends among hospital nurses from the full liberalization of the pandemic to the postpandemic era. Moreover, a comparative study on the turnover intentions of Chinese hospital nurses in these two critical time periods has not been reported to date. This dearth of information may prevent nursing managers and policy-makers from devising preventive and promotive interventions to mitigate the adverse consequences of turnover intention.
Anzeige
Additionally, it remains unclear which potential factors might be associated with the turnover intention of nurses in different periods, and this lack of research may impede timely and effective interventions for turnover intention. To fill this gap, the current study conducted a 2-wave multicentre cross-sectional comparison study of Chinese hospital nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19 (T1: 27 December 2022 to 7 January 2023) and the postpandemic era (T2: 11 May to 23 May 2023). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of turnover intention and identify its significantly associated factors among nurses in different periods of COVID-19 and in the postpandemic era. Consequently, our study will make a positive contribution to the literature, enabling nursing managers and policy-makers to closely monitor turnover intention, investigate its antecedents, and implement targeted strategies to reduce nurses’ turnover intention.
Methods
Study setting and sample
This large-scale repeated cross-sectional survey was performed in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, one of the highest-income cities in China. Convenience sampling was adopted as the recruitment strategy. In total, nurses from 25 hospitals were selected to participate in the current survey, which was performed from 27 December 2022 to 7 January 2023 (T1) and 11 May to 23 May 2023 (T2). The online questionnaire was distributed via “Wenjuan Xing” (https://www.wjx.cn/newwjx/manage/myquestionnaires.aspx), a professional questionnaire survey platform that is widely used in China [20]. A standardized notice applicable to these 25 hospitals was provided, elaborating on the purpose, significance, participation mode, completion method of this research, and the deadline. The online survey was initially disseminated using an instant messaging system, namely, the WeChat group, to nursing managers in Shenzhen hospitals, and they were encouraged to forward it to other nurses in Shenzhen hospitals. The inclusion criteria for participants were as follows: (1) had valid professional qualification certificates and were aged ≥ 18 years; (2) were employed at participating hospitals; (3) had sufficient cognitive capacity to comprehend and complete study instruments; and (4) provided written informed consent. The exclusion criteria were (1) current diagnosis of mental illness and (2) severe physical conditions that substantially affect work performance. The screening criterion included a response time of less than 200 s [21] to complete the survey, along with the deletion of incomplete or repeated responses. The effective sample sizes for T1 and T2 were 1,766 and 2,643, respectively, with effective rates of 96.34% and 94.87%, respectively.
Data collection
All the investigators underwent unified training regarding the online survey. Each question was mandatory, and only one response was permitted per the same IP address. Additionally, all participants were allowed to stop the survey at any time, and anonymity was guaranteed. The online questionnaire commenced with informed consent. Hospital nurses were required to read the informed consent form and select the “agree” option to start completing the questionnaire; otherwise, they could not complete it. To ensure the feasibility and suitability of the questionnaire, an online pilot survey involving 45 nurses from Shenzhen was conducted. The participating nurses were subsequently also solicited for suggestions regarding questionnaire modification. The data from the pilot test were not incorporated into the final statistics. The trained authors of this study distributed the final version of the questionnaires to hospital nurses for data collection.
Measures
Sociodemographic and work-related characteristics
The general information questionnaire, which was developed by the authors through literature reviews and group discussions, consists of two parts. The first part collects data related to nurses’ characteristics, such as gender, age, educational level, working years, marital status, annual monthly income, employment type, professional technical title, nurse hierarchy, job duty, number of night shifts per month, hospital type, and working unit. The second part encompasses job satisfaction, interest in nursing, and attitudes towards the current epidemic compared with those during the outbreak period.
Perceived stress
The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is founded on the theory of psychological stress and was developed by Cohen et al. in 1983 [22]. The PSS-10 is employed to gauge how stressful an individual perceives daily life events. The PSS-10 is a self-reported scale consisting of 10 items, with total scores ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores suggest a higher level of perceived stress in an individual. In the current study, the Cronbach’s alpha for the PSS-10 was 0.72 at T1 and 0.82 at T2.
Depression
The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a self-report scale crafted for the evaluation of depression experienced among patients and the general population within the past two weeks [23]. This questionnaire is predicated on the nine symptoms of depression outlined in the US Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) [24]. The PHQ-9 is scored on a 4-point Likert scale, and its total score varies from 0 to 27, with higher scores denoting a more conspicuous state of depression. In our study, the Cronbach’s alpha for the PHQ-9 was 0.93 at both T1 and T2.
Anxiety
The 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) is used to evaluate the severity of anxiety. This self-reported scale has outstanding reliability and validity [25]. The participants were obliged to report their anxiety symptoms during the two-week period prior to the assessment using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (almost every day). The total score ranged from 0 to 21, and higher scores indicated a more severe degree of anxiety symptoms. In the present study, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.97 at T1 and 0.96 at T2.
Insomnia
The 7-item Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was employed to assess the severity of insomnia within the past week [26]. The ISI comprises 7 items, with each item rated on a 5-point scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores on the ISI signify greater severity of insomnia during the previous month. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0.93 at both T1 and T2.
Intolerance of uncertainty
The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS) is a self-assessment instrument designed to measure intolerance of uncertainty using 12 items with a 5-point Likert scale [27]. The IUS generates a total score, and a higher score indicates greater intolerance of uncertainty, which leads to difficulty in tolerating negative emotions triggered by a lack of information concerning a specific situation [28]. In the present study, the Cronbach’s alpha of the IUS was 0.91 at T1 and 0.92 at T2.
Life satisfaction
The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) was employed to measure an individual’s overall assessment of their life satisfaction. The SWLS encompasses 5 items, among which 3 items mirror present-life satisfaction and the remaining 2 items represent past-life satisfaction. The scale is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (extreme dissatisfaction) to 7 (high satisfaction) [29]. Higher scores suggest a higher level of life satisfaction. The Cronbach’s alpha for the SWLS in the current study was 0.93 at T1 and 0.94 at T2.
Turnover intention
The turnover intention of hospital nurses was assessed using the turnover intention scale, which encompasses the likelihood of leaving the current position, the motivation for seeking a new job, and the probability of obtaining another job [30]. It comprises six items with a 4-point response scale, and each item has a total score of four points. Higher scores indicate more intense turnover intentions among nurses. A total average score of ≤ 2 for each item indicates that turnover intention is lower, and a score > 2 indicates that turnover intention is higher [30]. The Cronbach’s alphas of both scales were 0.81 at T1 and 0.80 at T2 in this study.
Data analysis
The data were analysed using SPSS version 26.0. Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies and central tendencies, were computed to describe the demographic profile of the sample. The chi-square test was performed to examine the difference in the prevalence of turnover intention between T1 and T2. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to investigate the associations between seven variables: anxiety, depression, perceived stress, insomnia, intolerance of uncertainty, life satisfaction and turnover intention. Binary and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the potential factors contributing to turnover intentions among hospital nurses during the sudden full liberalization period of COVID-19 and the postpandemic era. The four mental health symptoms (perceived stress, depression, anxiety, and insomnia) and other independent variables (intolerance of uncertainty, life satisfaction) were categorized into four groups based on quartiles, which represent the score’s position within the sample [31]. The first quartile ranged from 0% to 25%, the second from 25% to 50%, the third from 50% to 75%, and the fourth from 75% to 100%. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were derived from logistic regression models [31]. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Results
Demographic characteristics
In the two-wave survey, the vast majority of the participants (95.92% at T1 and 95.27% at T2) were female. Contemporary contract employees constituted a substantial proportion (over 80%). The number of clinical nurses was nearly four times greater than that of administrative nurses and others, with clinical nurses accounting for 80.92% of all T1 nurses and 77.75% of all T2 nurses. The detailed demographic information of the participants and their mental health status at the two time points are presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Descriptive characteristics of the sampled hospital nurses
Variables
T1 N (%)/(mean ± SD)
T2 N (%)/(mean ± SD)
Gender
Male
72 (4.08%)
125 (4.73%)
Female
1694 (95.92%)
2518 (95.27%)
Age, years
18–29
763 (43.20%)
1072 (40.56%)
30–39
579 (32.79%)
1022 (38.67%)
≥ 40
424 (24.01%)
549 (20.77%)
Educational level
Technical secondary school
25 (1.42%)
68 (2.57%)
Junior college
451 (25.54%)
666 (25.20%)
Bachelor
1270 (71.91%)
1895 (71.70%)
Master or higher
20 (1.13%)
14 (0.53%)
Years of nursing experience
Less than 1 year
75 (4.25%)
113 (4.28%)
1–5
469 (26.56%)
602 (22.78%)
6–10
421 (23.84%)
649 (2.56%)
11–20
453 (25.65%)
850 (32.16%)
21 or above
348 (19.71%)
429 (16.23%)
Monthly income level (CHY)*
≤ 4999
105 (5.95%)
234 (8.85%)
5000–9999
686 (38.84%)
1205 (45.59%)
10,000–14,999
686 (38.84%)
827 (31.29%)
15,000 or higher
289 (16.36%)
377 (14.26%)
Employment type
No fixed time contract staff
318 (18.01%)
392 (14.83%)
Contemporary contract staff
1448 (81.99%)
2251 (85.19%)
Professional titles
Primary technical title
1092 (61.83%)
1618 (61.22%)
Intermediate technical title
564 (31.94%)
873 (33.03%)
Senior technical title
110 (6.23%)
152 (5.75%)
Hierarchy of nurse
N0*
183 (10.36%)
270 (10.22%)
N1-N2*
988 (55.95%)
1365 (51.65%)
N3-N4*
542 (30.69%)
911 (34.47%)
N5-N6*
53 (3.00%)
97 (3.67%)
Job duty
Clinical nurse
1429 (80.92%)
2055 (77.75%)
Administrative nurse and others
337 (19.08%)
588 (22.25%)
Marital status
Married
1000 (56.63%)
1604 (60.69%)
Single
726 (41.11%)
965 (36.51%)
Divorced or widowed
40 (2.27%)
74 (2.80%)
Night shift per month
None
542 (30.69%)
789 (29.85%)
1–5
514 (29.11%)
942 (35.64%)
6–10
470 (26.61%)
670 (25.35%)
11 or more
240 (13.59%)
242 (9.16%)
Hospital type
General hospital
1476 (83.58%)
2204 (83.39%)
Specialist hospital
290 (16.42%)
439 (16.61%)
Working units
Surgery (including gynecology)
578 (32.73%)
761 (28.79%)
Medicine (including pediatrics)
420 (23.78%)
573 (21.68%)
Emergency
76 (4.30%)
154 (5.83%)
Intensive care unit
59 (3.34%)
100 (3.78%)
Out-patient
241 (13.65%)
315 (11.92%)
Others
392 (22.20%)
740 (28.00%)
Job satisfaction
Satisfied
856 (48.47%)
1640 (62.05%)
Neutral satisfied
618 (34.99%)
821 (31.06%)
Not satisfied
292 (16.53%)
182 (6.89%)
Lack of interest in nursing
Yes
665 (37.66%)
1141 (43.17%)
No
1101 (62.34%)
1502 (56.83%)
Attitude towards pandemic management
Very panic, anxiety
357 (20.22%)
77 (2.91%)
Mildly nervous, worried
500 (28.31%)
340 (12.86%)
Normal mindset
854 (48.36%)
1968 (74.46%)
Feel nothing
55 (3.11%)
258 (9.76%)
GAD-7
7.22 ± 5.63
5.54 ± 5.01
Q1
662 (37.49%)
1300 (49.19%)
Q2
637 (36.07%)
904 (34.20%)
Q3
143 (8.10%)
318 (12.03%)
Q4
324 (18.35%)
121 (4.58%)
PHQ-9
9.04 ± 6.06
6.88 ± 5.73
Q1
544 (30.80%)
546 (20.66%)
Q2
538 (30.46%)
833 (31.52%)
Q3
352 (19.93%)
706 (26.71%)
Q4
332 (18.80%)
558 (21.11%)
ISI
12.42 ± 6.45
10.18 ± 6.44
Q1
410 (23.22%)
658 (24.90%)
Q2
745 (42.19%)
704 (26.64%)
Q3
443 (25.08%)
657 (24.86%)
Q4
168 (9.51%)
624 (23.61%)
PSS-10
19.53 ± 5.22
17.71 ± 6.21
Q1
439 (24.85%)
645 (24.40%)
Q2
644 (36.47%)
754 (28.53%)
Q3
348 (19.71%)
598 (22.63%)
Q4
335 (18.97%)
646 (24.44%)
IUS-12
37.36 ± 9.60
35.65 ± 9.79
Q1
435 (24.63%)
610 (23.08%)
Q2
489 (27.69%)
767 (29.02%)
Q3
423 (23.95%)
639 (24.18%)
Q4
419 (23.73%)
627 (23.72%)
SWLS
20.26 ± 6.11
20.82 ± 6.39
Q1
419 (23.73%)
577 (21.83%)
Q2
655 (37.09%)
894 (33.83%)
Q3
269 (15.23%)
661 (25.01%)
Q4
423 (23.95%)
511 (19.33%)
Note: CHY1 = USD 0.14, based on the exchange rate on 24 September 2023
N0, registered nurse who were unable to care for patients independently; N1, registered nurse and who were able to care for patients independently; N2, nurses who have been qualified for 3 years as N1 nurses; N3, nurses who have obtained intermediate titles and are able to undertake various clinical/teaching tasks and a certain managerial duty; N4, nurses who have acquired deputy senior title or above and are able to undertake the work of quality management, teaching management; N5, nurses who have acquired senior title and are able to complete the work of guidance and review; N6, on the basis of N5 nurses, working hours were longer than N5 head nurses
GAD-7 represents the total score of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, PHQ-9 represents the total score of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, ISI represents the total score of the Insomnia Severity Index, PSS represents the total score of the 10-item Perceived Stress Scales, IUS represents the total score of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale, and SWLS represents the total score of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Q1 represents the first quartile, Q2 represents the second quartile, Q3 represents the third quartile, and Q4 represents the fourth quartile
Prevalence of turnover intentions at T1-T2
As depicted in Fig. 1, the prevalence of turnover intention at T1 and T2 was 73.33% (95% CI: [71.18, 75.37]) and 72.34% (95% CI: [70.64, 74.08]), respectively. The χ² test did not reveal a significant difference between the two groups, with χ²=7.522 and P = 0.057.
Fig. 1
Bar graph of the prevalence of turnover intention
×
Anzeige
Correlations between anxiety, depression, perceived stress, insomnia, intolerance of uncertainty, life satisfaction and turnover intention
The average scores of turnover intention among all the nurses at T1 and T2 were 2.49 (0.63) and 2.47 (0.62) points (Table 2), respectively. Higher turnover intention scores were positively correlated with anxiety, depression, perceived stress, insomnia, and intolerance of uncertainty (all P < 0.01) at both T1 and T2. Moreover, significant negative associations were also identified between turnover intention and life satisfaction (all P < 0.01) at both T1 and T2.
Table 2
Correlation matrix between anxiety, depression, perceived stress, insomnia, intolerance of uncertainty, satisfaction with life and turnover intention (T1 and T2)
T1
M
SD
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1. Anxiety
7.22
5.63
1.00
2. Depression
9.04
6.06
0.78**
1.00
3. Perceived Stress
19.53
5.22
0.51**
0.51**
1.00
4.Insomnia
12.42
6.45
0.62**
0.69**
0.41**
1.00
5.Intolerance of Uncertainty
37.36
9.60
0.60**
0.59**
0.47**
0.47**
1.00
6.Life Satisfaction
20.26
6.11
-0.36**
-0.38**
-0.20**
-0.32**
-0.29**
1.00
7.Turnover Intention
2.49
0.63
0.30**
0.30**
0.20**
0.28**
0.25**
-0.46**
1.00
T2
M
SD
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1. Anxiety
5.54
5.01
1.00
2. Depression
6.88
5.73
0.80**
1.00
3. Perceived Stress
17.71
6.21
0.66**
0.66**
1.00
4.Insomnia
10.18
6.44
0.60**
0.72**
0.55**
1.00
5.Intolerance of Uncertainty
35.65
9.79
0.58**
0.56**
0.52**
0.44**
1.00
6.Life Satisfaction
20.82
6.39
-0.38**
-0.42**
-0.48**
-0.37**
-0.31**
1.00
7.Turnover Intention
2.47
0.62
0.29**
0.32**
0.32**
0.30**
0.19**
-0.37**
1.00
Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with turnover intention
The results of binary and multiple logistic regression analyses regarding the factors for turnover intention are presented in Table 3. Binary and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the independent odds ratios (crude ORs [cORs]) and adjusted odds ratios (Adj ORs [aORs]) of the risk factors for turnover intention. These ratios were utilized to reflect the OR of each factor, both individually and jointly, during the prediction of turnover intention [29].
Table 3
Binary and multiple logistic regression analysis of the factors associated with turnover intention at T1 and T2
Variables
Category
T1
T2
Crude OR
95%CI
Adj OR
95%CI
Crude OR
95%CI
Adj OR
95%CI
Gender
Male
Female
0.285
**
(0.130, 0.627)
0.498
(0.203, 1.221)
0.642
(0.410, 1.003)
0.752
(0.442, 1.280)
Age, years
18–29
30–39
0.607
***
(0.461, 0.801)
1.345
(0.720, 2.512)
0.768
*
(0.624, 0.946)
1.207
(0.797, 1.827)
> 40
0.166
***
(0.126, 0.219)
0.908
(0.386, 2.136)
0.238
***
(0.190, 0.298)
0.867
(0.478, 1.572)
Educational level
Technical secondary school
Junior college
1.971
(0.861, 4.510)
0.853
(0.286, 2.544)
2.007
*
(1.192, 3.378)
1.328
(0.715, 2.467)
Bachelor
1.816
(0.808, 4.082)
0.985
(0.338, 2.870)
1.549
(0.941, 2.552)
1.213
(0.660, 2.229)
Master or higher
1.556
(0.447, 5.413)
1.186
(0.223, 6.300)
0.619
(0.195, 1.967)
0.677
(0.157, 2.917)
Years of nursing experience
Less than 1 year
1–5
1.401
(0.754, 2.604)
1.098
(0.480, 2.508)
1.601
*
(1.010, 2.537)
1.312
(0.749, 2.299)
6–10
1.664
(0.884, 3.132)
0.960
(0.369, 2.498)
1.737
*
(1.097, 2.750)
1.503
(0.798, 2.828)
11–20
0.577
(0.316, 1.051)
0.467
(0.154, 1.419)
0.966
(0.623, 1.500)
0.897
(0.431, 1.865)
21 or above
0.201
***
(0.110, 0.367)
0.347
(0.097, 1.240)
0.327
***
(0.208, 0.515)
0.672
(0.286, 1.579)
Monthly income level, CNY
≤ 4999
5000–9999
0.786
(0.458, 1.348)
0.896
(0.439, 1.831)
1.291
(0.881, 1.688)
1.399
(0.934, 2.096)
10,000–14,999
0.653
(0.382, 1.118)
0.886
(0.418, 1.879)
0.783
(0.562, 1.089)
1.066
(0.688, 1.652)
15,000 or higher
0.205
***
(0.118, 0.359)
0.567
(0.248, 1.300)
0.447
***
(0.313, 0.640)
1.298
(0.76, 2.199)
Employment type
No fixed time contract staff
Contemporary contract staff
4.377
***
(3.394, 5.644)
1.386
(0.862, 2.226)
4.245
***
(3.399, 5.301)
2.593
***
(1.797, 3.741)
Professional titles
Primary title
Intermediate title
0.335
***
(0.266, 0.423)
0.794
(0.479, 1.315)
0.522
***
(0.434, 0.627)
0.962
(0.669, 1.383)
Senior title
0.123
***
(0.081, 0.186)
0.745
(0.340, 1.635)
0.180
***
(0.128, 0.255)
1.047
(0.553, 1.984)
Hierarchy of nurse
N0
N1-N2
1.457
*
(1.006, 2.111)
1.507
(0.878, 2.588)
1.297
(0.960, 1.754)
1.168
(0.784, 1.740)
N3-N4
0.535
**
(0.367, 0.779)
2.179
*
(1.086, 4.371)
0.659
**
(0.486, 0.894)
1.254
(0.755, 2.084)
N5-N6
0.238
***
(0.126, 0.452)
2.679
(0.957, 7.504)
0.267
***
(0.165, 0.434)
1.166
(0.533, 2.552)
Job duty
Clinical nurse
Administrative nurse and others
0.460
***
(0.358, 0.591)
1.197
(0.812, 1.765)
0.582
***
(0.497, 0.707)
1.743
***
(1.279, 2.376)
Marital status
Married
Single
2.903
***
(2.279, 3.698)
1.268
(0.820, 1.961)
2.209
***
(1.818, 2.684)
1.364
(0.989, 1.879)
Divorced or widowed
0.379
**
(0.200, 0.719)
0.525
(0.231, 1.195)
0.509
**
(0.319, 0.813)
0.661
(0.375, 1.167)
Night shift per month
None
1–5
2.096
***
(1.615, 2.720)
1.120
(0.774, 1.619)
1.689
***
(1.379, 2.068)
1.112
(0.848, 1.458)
6–10
3.621
***
(2.694, 4.867)
1.175
(0.756, 1.826)
2.750
***
(2.161, 3.499)
1.141
(0.825, 1.577)
11 or more
5.121
***
(3.369, 7.785)
0.913
(0.527, 1.172)
3.216
***
(2.226, 4.648)
1.215
(0.763, 1.935)
Hospital type
General hospital
Specialist hospital
0.675
**
(0.515, 0.885)
0.823
(0.578, 1.172)
1.006
(0.800, 1.265)
1.005
(0.754, 1.338)
Working units
Surgery
Medicine
1.345
(0.992, 1.847)
0.917
(0.624, 1.349)
1.433
**
(1.098, 1.869)
1.138
(0.834, 1.553)
Emergency
0.680
(0.404, 1.143)
0.514
(0.263, 1.005)
0.948
(0.638, 1.409)
0.780
(0.487, 1.250)
Intensive care unit
2.770
*
(1.166, 6.584)
0.587
(0.197, 1.748)
1.331
(0.794, 2.232)
0.923
(0.495, 1.720)
Out-patient
0.490
***
(0.356, 0.677)
0.878
(0.558, 1.384)
0.579
***
(0.436, 0.767)
0.813
(0.559, 1.184)
Other
0.632
**
(0.476, 0.840)
1.022
(0.705, 1.481)
0.622
***
(0.497, 0.777)
0.744
*
(0.568, 0.975)
Job satisfaction
Satisfied
Average
6.160
***
(4.661, 8.142)
3.031
***
(2.167, 4.240)
4.638
***
(3.667, 5.867)
2.393
***
(1.824, 3.140)
Not satisfied
21.079
***
(11.370, 39.077)
8.659
***
(4.242, 17.674)
9.548
***
(5.148, 17.709)
4.088
***
(2.058, 8.122)
Lack of interest in nursing
No
Yes
5.835
***
(4.639, 7.340)
3.077
***
(2.319, 4.084)
4.329
***
(3.606, 5.197)
2.713
***
(2.183, 3.371)
Attitude towards pandemic management
Feel nothing
Normal mindset
0.491
***
(0.244, 0.990)
1.184
(0.500,2.802)
0.527
***
(0.380, 0.732)
1.158
(0.779, 1.721)
Mildly nervous, worried
0.660
***
(0.323, 1.347)
1.276
(0.530, 3.074)
0.836
(0.557, 1.255)
1.267
(0.782, 2.051)
Very panic, anxiety
0.928
(0.445, 1.932)
0.879
(0.352, 2.194)
0.945
(0.496, 1.801)
0.702
(0.333, 1.483)
PSS-10
Q1
Q2
1.508
**
(1.163, 1.954)
1.192
(0.851, 1.668)
2.020
***
(1.620, 2.518)
1.107
(0.843, 1.453)
Q3
2.408
***
(1.734, 3.344)
1.536
(0.983, 2.400)
3.540
***
(2.741, 4.571)
1.185
(0.841, 1.670)
Q4
2.627
***
(1.873, 3.685)
1.068
(0.643, 1.776)
4.657
***
(3.576, 6.065)
1.026
(0.674, 1.561)
GAD-7
Q1
Q2
2.435
***
(1.903, 3.117)
1.273
(0.877, 1.849)
2.718
***
(2.220, 3.329)
1.356
*
(1.005, 1.829)
Q3
2.761
***
(1.766, 4.317)
1.302
(0.679, 2.497)
2.967
***
(2.169, 4.060)
0.860
(0.520, 1.423)
Q4
3.362
***
(2.404, 4.700)
1.381
(0.731, 2.608)
2.890
***
(1.782, 4.688)
0.774
(0.381, 1.572)
PHQ-9
Q1
Q2
2.588
***
(1.984, 3.376)
1.570
*
(1.066, 2.310)
2.146
***
(1.716, 2.684)
1.437
*
(1.067, 1.936)
Q3
3.036
***
(2.217, 4.159)
1.012
(0.610, 1.680)
4.187
***
(3.248, 5.399)
2.113
***
(1.405, 3.178)
Q4
3.583
***
(2.566, 5.003)
0.867
(0.454, 1.654)
5.210
***
(3.916, 6.931)
1.895
*
(1.105, 3.252)
ISI
Q1
Q2
2.175
***
(1.684, 2.809)
1.238
(0.872, 1.756)
1.912
***
(1.527, 2.394)
1.053
(0.789, 1.406)
Q3
3.328
***
(2.440, 4.539)
1.515
(0.951, 2.414)
2.874
***
(2.254, 3.664)
1.072
(0.767, 1.496)
Q4
4.260
***
(2.668, 6.800)
1.053
(0.526, 2.108)
3.692
***
(2.849, 4.784)
0.887
(0.593, 1.327)
IUS-12
Q1
Q2
1.829
***
(1.383, 2.417)
0.961
(0.664, 1.391)
1.624
***
(1.296, 2.035)
0.954
(0.720, 1.264)
Q3
2.099
***
(1.561, 2.823)
0.834
(0.556, 1.253)
2.245
***
(1.755, 2.873)
0.999
(0.725, 1.376)
Q4
2.942
***
(2.146, 4.033)
0.749
(0.460, 1.219)
2.597
***
(2.014, 3.348)
0.886
(0.619, 1.268)
SWLS
Q1
Q2
0.377
***
(0.256, 0.555)
0.535
**
(0.342, 0.837)
0.592
***
(0.441, 0.794)
0.687
*
(0.491, 0.961)
Q3
0.225
***
(0.147, 0.344)
0.469
**
(0.282, 0.780)
0.327
***
(0.244, 0.439)
0.584
**
(0.414, 0.822)
Q4
0.090
***
(0.061, 0.133)
0.282
***
(0.177, 0.450)
0.127
***
(0.094, 0.172)
0.330
***
(0.228, 0.477)
Note: ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05. PSS-10 represents the total score of the Perceived Stress Scale. Q1 represents the first quartile; Q2 represents the second quartile; Q3 represents the third quartile; and Q4 represents the fourth quartile
Anzeige
Most of the influencing factors were capable of independently predicting turnover intention; however, differences emerged during joint prediction. Multiple variables, including age, years of nursing experience, monthly income level (≥ 15,000), professional title, hierarchy of nurse, marital status, night shift per month, working units, attitudes towards pandemic management, perceived stress, anxiety, insomnia, and intolerance of uncertainty, were identified as independent predictors of turnover intention. However, when the joint prediction of turnover intention across time periods T1 to T2 was analysed, the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) did not reach statistical significance (all Ps > 0.05). Nurses who were moderately satisfied or not satisfied with their jobs and lacked interest in nursing during T1 and T2 were risk factors for turnover intention when they jointly predicted it (Ps < 0.05). Furthermore, higher life satisfaction during T1 and T2 served as a protective factor for turnover intention during jointly prediction (Ps < 0.05). The employment type of contemporary contract staff was a risk factor for turnover intention during separate prediction [T1: cOR = 4.377, 95% CI: (3.394, 5.644), P < 0.001; T2: cOR = 4.245, 95% CI: (3.399, 5.301), P < 0.001]. Nevertheless, when combined, this variable remained a risk factor at T2 [aOR = 2.593, 95% CI: (1.797, 3.741), P < 0.001)], but the aOR was not significant at T1 during joint prediction (P > 0.05). Having a job duty as an administrative nurse or in other related positions was a protective factor for turnover intention during separate prediction [T1: cOR = 0.460, 95% CI: (0.358, 0.591), P < 0.001; T2: cOR = 0.582, 95% CI: (0.358, 0.591), P < 0.001]. Intriguingly, during joint prediction, this variable became a risk factor at T2 [aOR = 1.743, 95% CI: (1.279, 2.376), P < 0.001)]; however, the aOR was not significant at T1 during joint prediction of turnover intention (P > 0.05). Depression was negatively correlated with turnover intention during individual prediction (Ps < 0.001). Moreover, depression remained a risk factor at T2 [aOR: 1.437 ~ 2.113, 95% CI: (1.067, 3.252), P < 0.001)]. However, during the TI period and comparing Q2 of depression was compared with Q1 of depression, the difference was statistically significant [aOR = 1.570, 95% CI: (1.066, 2.310), P < 0.05)].
Discussion
In this pioneering 2-wave, multicentre cross-sectional study examining nurse turnover intentions during the full liberalization of COVID-19 and postpandemic periods, we found consistently high prevalence rates, with no significant decline between the two time points. The prevalence rates were also higher than those reported in other studies conducted among hospital nurses at the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak [13, 32, 33]. Despite the return to normal operations in the postpandemic era, the persistently high turnover intention rates suggest enduring impacts of the pandemic on the nursing workforce, warranting continued vigilance and intervention. Continuous monitoring and tracking of turnover intention are necessary, along with the identification of appropriate response and intervention strategies, which are consistent with previous research.
The results indicated that mental health issues, including anxiety, depression, and insomnia, were positively correlated with turnover intention among nursing staff. Several studies have verified the significant positive associations between anxiety, depression, insomnia and turnover intention [34‐36]. Moreover, anxiety and depression have been consistently identified as predictors of turnover intention in previous studies [37]. Notably, after adjustments were made for other variables, anxiety and insomnia ceased to be predictors of turnover intention among nurses. Additionally, depression was not significantly associated with turnover intention during the initial stage of the full liberalization of COVID-19 (T1) but became significant during the postpandemic era (T2). However, Tabur et al. demonstrated that anxiety and depression were not predictors of turnover intention among health care professionals [38]. The result appears to be consistent with our study, and this finding can be largely attributed to the differences in the statistical analysis methods used [34]. Given the significant correlation between anxiety and depression scores, statistically significant results may vary when anxiety and depression are simultaneously incorporated into the same model [39]. On the other hand, the aforementioned results might be related to the numerous variables included in the prediction model [33]. Given that many variables are incorporated into the equation for joint prediction, the effect of depression could be weakened or interact with other factors [31].
Analogous to the outcomes of prior studies, psychological factors such as life satisfaction are crucial elements in relation to turnover intention. Life satisfaction can be gauged by general well-being. In the present study, life satisfaction was negatively correlated with turnover intention among nursing staff, and these results paralleled those of previous studies [40,41], indicating that enhancing nurses’ well-being can mitigate their turnover intentions and turnover rates. According to the literature, a favourable sense of well-being can significantly augment nurses’ psychological resilience and mental health and is associated with lower absenteeism and turnover intention [42]. Consequently, preventive and promotive interventions as well as positive psychology interventions should be implemented to the fullest extent possible to curtail the occurrence of turnover intention among nurses.
Anzeige
In this study, nurses’ turnover intentions were significantly affected by their job satisfaction. Nurses who are dissatisfied with their nursing work are more prone to leave their workplace, which is consistent with the results of previous studies [43]. A cross-sectional study in Ethiopia indicated that hospital nurses who were unsatisfied with their job autonomy were 2.55 times more likely to intend to quit their jobs than those who reported satisfaction [43]. Turnover theory emphasizes that turnover intention stems from workers’ dissatisfaction, and our study supports this theory [44]. To alleviate nurses’ turnover intentions, effective intervention measures should be implemented in a timely manner to increase their job satisfaction. Another significant predictor of turnover intention in hospitals was nurses’ interest in their nursing work. Specifically, nurses who lack interest in their job usually lack clear career goals and planning; more seriously, they may even question their competence in the job. Ultimately, such nursing staff may have greater turnover intentions. Some prior studies have suggested that professional nurses in emergency or critical care medicine are more likely to experience greater overwork and stress than those in other departments are, which could lead to greater turnover intentions [45]. However, no such associations were found in the current study. Because the nurses in the 2-wave multicentre survey were mostly medical, surgical, and outpatient nurses, with a low number of nurses from the emergency department and ICU, the results of our study differed from those of previous studies. Therefore, the working department may not be a factor influencing turnover intention among chinese nursing staff, and further studies are needed to clarify this issue.
Furthermore, our findings demonstrated that contemporary contract nursing staff, compared with no fixed-time contract staff and administrative nurses versus clinical nurses, presented a higher turnover intention rate at T2. The primary reason might be that the proportion of contemporary contract nurses (81.99% at TI and 85.19% at T2 in the present study) was greater than that reported by Cao [46] (65.72%) and Chen [47] (69.46%), potentially contributing to greater turnover intention. Because the 2-wave multicentre survey was conducted during different special times, the above results were not significant at T1, which also verified that the factors associated with high turnover intention during different periods were not uniform. Specifically, the Chinese nursing employment system has two parallel types of employment for nursing staff: no fixed-time contract nurses and contemporary contract nurses. Although both types of nurses perform the same work, contemporary contract nurses receive lower salaries and fewer benefits than no fixed-time contract nurses do [48]. Consequently, contemporary contract nurses are more inclined to leave their positions. To reduce nurse turnover, the Chinese government should prioritize the formulation of rational policies to eliminate the disparities between no fixed-time contract nurses and contemporary contract nurses and increase development opportunities for hospital nursing staff [49]. Our study revealed that administrative nurses had an elevated risk of turnover intention compared with clinical nurses. Although these administrative nurses had relatively successful professional careers, more work experience, better positions, and higher salaries, turnover intentions did not tend to decrease. It is possible that these nurses were engaged in more nursing management, quality and safety work. Moreover, the appointment of administrative nurses is relatively conservative in chinese hospitals, as most administrative nurses are selected from those with excellent clinical skills and rich nursing knowledge [50], regardless of their management abilities and without further administrative training. Thus, administrative nurses have few standards to guide their work [51] and may feel inadequately qualified for their position, especially during special periods of public emergency.
The findings of this study are potentially beneficial in guiding hospital administrators to comprehensively understand nurses’ responses regarding turnover intentions during the pre- and postpandemic eras and further facilitating the provision of preventive and promotive interventions to mitigate turnover intentions and enhance the mental health of this particular group. This study has clarified the factors associated with the turnover intentions the nursing profession during the full liberalization of the COVID-19 period and during the postpandemic era.
There are several limitations to this current study concerning the sample size and sampling approach. First, the convenience sampling method might not be representative or applicable in a generalizable manner to hospital nurses in China. The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on nursing staff turnover intentions could have been either overestimated or underestimated. We were unable to determine the prevalence of turnover intention among hospital nurses who did not participate in our research. Second, given the constraints associated with using correlation scales for turnover intention, intolerance of uncertainty, life satisfaction and mental health, this 2-wave cross-sectional design restricts the explanation of causal relationships. Future longitudinal research is needed to accurately track alterations in turnover intention and mental health among nursing staff.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the current study initially depicted the prevalence of turnover intentions among chinese hospital nurses during the two crucial periods, namely, the full liberalization of COVID-19 and the postpandemic era. Despite the return to normal in the postpandemic era, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a long-term and profound negative impact on nursing work, leading to increased turnover intention and workforce shortages. Moreover, we discovered that turnover intention among hospital nurses was associated with multiple factors, such as dissatisfaction with nursing work, lack of interest in nursing, life satisfaction, depression, employment type and job duties. These findings facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of hospital management regarding the prevalence of turnover intentions among nursing staff since the full liberalization of COVID-19 and offer guidance and targeted, practical policy-making recommendations within nursing human resources departments. There is an urgent need for longitudinal studies, qualitative studies, or even mixed methods to provide further evidence concerning the development of nursing careers and the mental health of nurses. The chinese adaptations of the standardized questionnaires utilized in the current study are reliable and valid, and they can assist health care managers in identifying areas of concern within their institution and implementing effective interventions to prevent nurses from resigning and promoting their career success.
Implications for nursing management
Our study recommends continuous monitoring of turnover intention among hospital nurses, implementing measures to increase nursing job satisfaction and nurse care, cultivating nurses’ interest in nursing work and providing targeted psychological intervention services. Hospital managers should fully utilize the advantages of job duties when distributing work based on the capabilities of administrative nurses to improve their management skills and guide clinical nurses to engage in nursing work with enthusiasm and initiative. According to the requirements of nurses at different levels, it is crucial to offer diverse opportunities and support to assist nurses in pursuing further education and career development, allocate human resources rationally to keep them active in fulfilling their tasks, and reduce turnover rates. Moreover, the selection and training of specialized nurses constitute a highly significant career development direction. The development of specialized nursing enables specialized nurses to intensify their work in the field they are proficient in or fond of, thereby attaining a sense of professional value and accomplishment.
Simultaneously, we propose various forms of stress-reduction activities for nurses, including psychological counselling, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and sandplay, with the aim of improving their general well-being and emotional intelligence. We advocate for an increase in night-shift allowances and salaries for nurses, as well as the expansion of rewards and rest time for night-shift nurses. This ensures that nurses obtain sufficient rest after night shifts and enhances their professional satisfaction. In most developed countries, the income level of nurses typically exceeds the average social income. Under the precondition of guaranteeing the quality of nursing care and patient safety, we encourage the rational appointment and scheduling of nurses. Moreover, head nurses should endeavour to meet the individual needs of nurses while ensuring normal work operations. Only through these measures can we reduce turnover intention among nurses, enhance career satisfaction, and optimize the structure of nursing teams not only in China but also potentially in other countries.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all the frontline nurses who took their time to participate in the study, especially those subjects who provided our study with essential information about their feelings, supporting us to complete the survey.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was in line with ethical principles, and the contents of the questionnaire didn’t involve private and sensitive topics such as names. More importantly, the study was conducted in strict accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. And the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Board of Shenzhen People’s Hospital (Approval No. LL-KY−2023107−01). All individuals were given information about introducing the study and notified about their own right to withdraw at any time, and informed consent was sought from all eligible participants, which illustrated that they had understood the study in its entirety.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
What is behind the high turnover intention among hospital nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19 and the postpandemic era in China: a 2-wave multicentre cross-sectional comparison study
verfasst von
Julan Xiao Lili Liu Yueming Peng Xia Lyu Chunfeng Xing Yanling Tao Shening Zhu Aihuan Mai Lijun Liang Hongying Hu Yi Fan Weisi Peng Haishan Xie Jun Ren Weixiang Luo