Introduction
Nurses play a critical role in healthcare, providing direct patient care, advocating for patients’ well-being, and contributing to a positive healing environment. However, their ability to fulfill these core responsibilities can be hampered by a phenomenon often referred to as “non-nursing tasks” (NNTs) [
1‐
3]. These tasks, as the title “We Do Others’ Jobs” suggests, can encompass a wide range of duties that fall outside the traditional scope of nursing practice. Examples might include administrative work, answering phones, or even cleaning duties.
In Jordan, the typical nursing job description encompasses a wide range of responsibilities, including providing direct patient care, administering medications, monitoring patient progress, coordinating with other healthcare professionals, and educating patients and their families about health maintenance and disease prevention. Nurses are expected to uphold high standards of clinical practice and adhere to strict ethical guidelines while managing their patients’ overall health and well-being. However, despite these defined roles, Jordanian nurses frequently encounter non-nursing tasks (NNTs) that detract from their primary responsibilities. These tasks often include administrative duties, clerical work, and activities typically performed by other healthcare staff. There is a significant gap in knowledge regarding the prevalence and impact of NNTs on nurses, both within Jordan and in the international context. This study aims to address this gap by exploring the challenges posed by NNTs and their consequences on nurses’ professional lives, thereby contributing to a better understanding of how to enhance nursing practice and patient care.
Nurses often find themselves diverted from their core caregiving duties, assuming various non-nursing roles due to moral obligation and organizational pressures [
2,
4,
5]. Increased awareness of nursing identity, spurred by academic education, has led nurses to vocalize concerns about this issue [
5]. Redesigning organizational processes and fostering inter-professional cooperation through policy changes are suggested to address this challenge [
2,
4]. Practical solutions include structuring work environments to minimize nurses’ NNTs by allocating efficient support services, thus reducing undone nursing tasks [
6]. Nursing students’ perception of the profession can be improved by enhancing their preparedness through orientation programs [
1]. Nurse managers should monitor activities and reallocate efforts to prioritize nursing care, thereby reducing missed care and enhancing client outcomes [
7]. Systemically, continuous support for nursing identity and redesigning care models to encourage cooperation among healthcare professionals are essential [
8]. Healthcare education frameworks should instill moral obligations universally to foster future inter-professional partnerships [
2,
4]. Additionally, rethinking staff compositions and skill mixes is necessary to adapt to evolving healthcare demands [
5].
Technology offers potential in reducing NNTs by automating administrative tasks through healthcare information systems, though successful adoption in Jordan requires infrastructure and resource considerations [
9]. Inter-professional collaboration, promoting task distribution based on expertise, aligns with global trends toward team-based care models, potentially easing NNT burdens [
10]. Re-evaluating staffing and considering additional support roles can alleviate pressure on nurses, optimizing workforce efficiency [
11,
12].
In the US, nursing services encompass various roles, with registered nurses assuming responsibilities from physical examinations to research, while nurses in low-middle-income countries face challenges like job ambiguity and work overload [
12‐
14]. Jordanian nurses experience exacerbated role ambiguity due to NNT performance, highlighting the need for contextual solutions [
1]. Understanding these differences is crucial for tailoring strategies to local contexts and effectively addressing NNT challenges.
The prevalence of NNTs in nursing practice has gained global attention, including in Jordan, where concerns about patient care quality and nurse well-being have escalated [
1]. Clarifying nursing roles is crucial to prevent NNT encroachment and ensure efficient task allocation [
15]. However, existing research on NNTs in Arab nations, particularly Jordan, remains limited, with a focus on quantitative studies and a lack of exploration into interventions and solutions [
1,
16,
17]. Qualitative research is essential for understanding the complex contextual factors contributing to NNTs and devising targeted interventions [
5,
18].
While NNTs are not a new issue in healthcare, their prevalence and impact on nurses, particularly in developing countries, warrant further exploration. In Jordan, nurses are primarily responsible for direct patient care, including administering medications, monitoring vital signs, providing wound care, and educating patients and their families. Additionally, they coordinate care, manage patient records, and ensure overall patient well-being. However, Jordanian nurses often find themselves burdened with NNTs such as administrative duties, clerical work, and tasks that should be performed by other healthcare professionals, which detract from their primary responsibilities [
19,
20]. This qualitative study delves into the experiences of Jordanian nurses with NNTs to fill the knowledge gap about this topic both nationally and internationally. Through in-depth focus group interviews, we aim to understand the specific challenges Jordanian nurses face due to NNTs, the impact on their workload and well-being, and their perspectives on potential solutions. Our research highlights the significant strain that NNTs place on nurses, leading to role confusion, increased workload, and decreased job satisfaction [
21]. By exploring these themes, this study seeks to contribute to the growing body of research on NNTs and advocate for targeted solutions that allow nurses to concentrate on their core competencies. Ultimately, addressing the issue of NNTs can lead to improved patient care, better job satisfaction for nurses, and a more efficient healthcare system.
Methodology
Design
The objective of this research was to delve into nurses’ perspectives on NNTs in Jordan, aiming to comprehend and classify these tasks based on nurses’ viewpoints [
23,
24]. The decision to employ a qualitative exploratory design stemmed from the lack of clear definitions of NNTs in the Jordanian context and the novelty of investigating NNTs in Jordan [
25,
26]. A qualitative approach was chosen for its capacity to gather detailed, nuanced information and provide a thorough understanding of the social phenomena under scrutiny [
23,
27]. This methodology excels in addressing questions of “why” and “how,” aligning well with the objective of exploring varied perceptions and interpretations of NNTs across different healthcare settings in Jordan.
Settings
Jordan’s healthcare system is organized into four principal sectors: public, private, university, and military, a delineation established by Al-Hamdan et al. (2017) [
28]. This study targeted three expansive hospitals to investigate the phenomenon of NNTs, each representing a different sector: governmental, educational, and private institutions. The selection process for these hospitals was meticulous, focusing on their strategic placement in Amman, which is the urban hub where approximately 40% of Jordan’s population resides. This strategic location facilitated access to a broad spectrum of nursing professionals and provided insights into the challenges faced by healthcare workers in the capital.
Furthermore, these hospitals were chosen to ensure a diverse sample of nurses from various regions across Jordan. The chosen governmental hospital represents the public sector and offers a wide range of services to a large patient population. The educational hospital, associated with a major university, not only provides healthcare services but also serves as a training ground for future healthcare professionals, representing the university sector. The private hospital, representing the private sector, caters to patients who seek specialized and often more immediate care.
These hospitals boast multidisciplinary departments and a substantial nursing workforce, factors that eased the process of data collection and enriched the study’s findings. By encompassing these diverse contexts, the study aimed to glean a nuanced understanding of NNTs among nurses in Jordan. This comprehensive approach ensured that the findings reflected the varied experiences and challenges of nurses across different healthcare sectors and geographic regions, providing a holistic view of the impact of NNTs on nursing practice in Jordan.
Population and sample
This study aimed to understand how registered nurses (RNs) experience and perceive NNTs in their daily work. To gain valuable insights, the research specifically recruited nurses with recent and direct patient care experience. Purposive sampling, a method focusing on specific qualities, ensured participants had the relevant knowledge. Nurses included were actively involved in providing care across various hospital departments within the past six months. Those solely in managerial positions or not directly involved in patient care, like research or education, were excluded.
The qualitative nature of the research, seeking in-depth understanding, meant a smaller sample size was ideal. This allowed for focused discussions where each nurse could share their unique perspective on NNTs. Focus group interviews were chosen as the best way to collect data. These groups, with 4 to 10 participants each, fostered an environment where diverse viewpoints could be exchanged. Rich discussions within the groups would generate a deeper understanding of NNTs’ impact on nurses.
To ensure a well-rounded picture, the study recruited a total of 38 experienced nurses from three different hospitals. This strategic selection encompassed nurses from various departments within each hospital, reflecting the diverse realities of nursing practice. By including participants from different settings and departments, the research aimed to capture a broad spectrum of experiences with NNTs. This ultimately enriched the data by providing a more nuanced understanding of how nurses perceive and deal with NNTs in their daily work. Overall, this sampling strategy targeted a specific group of experienced nurses with diverse backgrounds, allowing the research to explore the complexities of NNTs from a variety of perspectives within the nursing profession.
Data collection method
For data collection, this research employed focus group interviews, a method specifically chosen to leverage the power of group interaction. These sessions aimed to not only gather individual perspectives on NNTs but also to spark collaboration and discussion among participants. This collaborative environment fostered a richer exchange of ideas, potentially leading to the emergence of unique viewpoints or shared challenges that might not have surfaced in individual interviews.
The focus groups were conducted in carefully chosen spaces. Privacy was paramount, ensuring participants felt comfortable expressing their honest opinions and experiences with NNTs. The chosen locations were also conducive to open and engaging discussions, free from distractions. To ensure a comprehensive record of the sessions, all focus groups were audio-recorded with the participants’ consent. These recordings were then supplemented with detailed notes taken by the facilitator throughout the discussions. These notes captured not only the verbal content but also any non-verbal cues or body language that could provide additional insights.
The interview format chosen for the focus groups was semi-structured. This approach utilized a pre-defined interview protocol, outlined in Table
1, to guide the discussion and ensure all key areas of interest related to NNTs within the Jordanian healthcare context were covered. The protocol included a series of open-ended questions designed to prompt participants to reflect on their understanding of NNTs and their impact on their work. These questions also encouraged participants to share their personal experiences, both positive and negative, related to NNTs. Additionally, the protocol incorporated questions that solicited suggestions for mitigating the prevalence of NNTs and potentially streamlining workflows within Jordanian healthcare settings. The semi-structured nature of the interview format allowed for flexibility. The facilitator could probe deeper into interesting points raised by participants or explore related topics that emerged organically during the discussion. This flexibility ensured that the focus groups captured not just the pre-determined areas of interest but also the full range of nurses’ experiences and perspectives on NNTs.
Table 1
Interview Guide (Schedule)
1. How do you define the concept of NNTs? 2. What do NNTs mean from your point of view? 3. How can we decrease the spread of NNTs within Jordanian health settings? |
Ethical considerations
Ethical clearance was secured from the nursing ethical approval for human research committee of Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Applied Science Private University the Applied Science Private University (#2022-NC-119) and the respective hospitals involved in this study, safeguarding the rights and well-being of participants. All methods were conducted in strict adherence to the relevant guidelines and regulations, including the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki [
32].
Participation in the research was entirely voluntary, with no coercion or repercussions for declining involvement. Prior to their participation, each potential participant received a detailed invitation letter delineating the study’s objectives and procedures. Informed consent, indicating an understanding of the study’s purpose and procedures, was obtained from all participants, who retained the right to withdraw from the study at any point without consequence. To ensure the safety and comfort of participants, interviews were conducted in secure, public settings, guaranteeing confidentiality and minimizing any potential discomfort or coercion. Furthermore, to protect participants’ identities and uphold confidentiality, pseudonyms were employed throughout the study, thereby anonymizing their contributions and ensuring privacy. These ethical measures were rigorously implemented to uphold the principles of respect, autonomy, confidentiality, and beneficence throughout the research process.
Data Analysis
Thematic analysis, following the framework outlined by Braun and Clarke (2019), was employed to scrutinize the interview data [
29]. This method entails several phases, including coding techniques to identify and annotate underlying concepts, organizing related material into groups, and linking disparate concepts and themes. The process comprises six steps for data extraction [
29].
To commence the analysis, the writers familiarized themselves with the data by listening to the taped interviews multiple times. This step aimed to distill the essence of the experiences shared by participants. The interviews were then meticulously transcribed verbatim in Arabic, the language spoken by the participants, to ensure the authenticity and accuracy of the narratives. Subsequently, the transcribed data were transferred to a computer for further examination.
During the analysis, data were coded and labeled based on the similarity of concepts, facilitating the grouping of information. This process generated around 100 free nodes, formed through the aggregation of codes into categories, subthemes, and overarching themes, each reflecting shared or unique meanings.
To ensure rigor and consistency in the analysis, consensus on the interpretation of units, codes, categories, and themes was sought among the researchers. This collaborative approach facilitated inter-coder agreement, enhancing the credibility and reliability of the findings. Additionally, the NVivo program was utilized to manage and organize the data, aiding in the systematic and comprehensive analysis of the thematic patterns emerging from the interviews.
Discussion
The investigation into Jordanian nurses and NNTs: challenges and solutions provides a comprehensive examination of how NNTs impact the roles, workload, and satisfaction of nurses in Jordan. Employing a qualitative research approach, this study delved deeply into the nuanced experiences and perspectives of Jordanian nurses regarding NNTs. Through semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, the intricate layers of the NNT phenomenon within the Jordanian healthcare context were explored. The journey into this realm revealed a complex landscape of challenges and opportunities, drawing from the narratives and insights shared by Jordanian nurses, unearthing a wealth of information on the identification, classification, and impact of NNTs. The findings of this study align with global trends, as Jordanian nurses, similar to their international counterparts, are engaged in various NNTs, including administrative work and patient transport. These findings corroborate prevalent NNTs reported in diverse healthcare settings globally [
2,
6,
30].
This study holds several unique distinctions, notably being the inaugural qualitative investigation into nurses’ perceptions of NNTs, a term with varied definitions globally [
5]. Moreover, it is imperative to acknowledge the broad spectrum of tasks considered as NNTs, including activities such as phone answering and administrative duties, which may not be universally classified as such [
31,
32]. Furthermore, most related studies have been conducted in developed nations, underscoring the significance of this research in the context of a developing country like Jordan [
5,
30,
33].
Nurses articulated their frustration with tasks that extended beyond their official roles, aligning with previous research findings [
1,
5]. These tasks, ranging from administrative duties to patient transport responsibilities, not only impeded their effectiveness but also hindered their career advancement prospects. These findings resonate with earlier studies highlighting the detrimental effects of NNTs on job satisfaction, morale, and ultimately, patient care, as observed in the previous researches [
6,
17,
28]. Additionally, nurses expressed concerns about unclear role definitions, which contributed to further confusion in task allocation.
In response to these challenges, participants proposed various solutions, including clearer job descriptions, stricter task assignment protocols, and increased involvement of higher authorities. Moreover, building nurses’ assertiveness and self-advocacy, along with activating nursing unions, emerged as potential strategies to address these issues. These proposed solutions align with prior research emphasizing the crucial role of organizational support, managerial interventions, and advocacy efforts, as noted in the previous study [
6].
The investigation among nurses in Jordan illuminated the state of NNTs in this particular setting, consistent with global patterns seen in other studies. Like their international counterparts, Jordanian nurses often engage in a variety of NNTs, including administrative work, answering phones, obtaining supplies, cleaning medical equipment and patient rooms, and patient transportation [
5,
30,
31]. These findings align with prevalent NNTs reported in various healthcare contexts globally [
30,
34].
Addressing the issue of NNTs is crucial for improving nursing care quality and nurse well-being. The current study aligns with existing literature while offering unique insights into proposed solutions, emphasizing the importance of clear task assignments, accountability mechanisms, and well-defined job descriptions [
6]. Adequate staffing and resource allocation are critical strategies for mitigating the burden of NNTs, resonating with suggestions from previous research [
6].
Confusion and uncertainty around nursing duties present challenges that need to be addressed through early education on task delineation, especially during clinical training, as recommended in the previous study [
1]. Additionally, the development of nurses’ assertiveness and the activation of nursing unions play crucial roles in advocating for nurses’ rights and influencing healthcare policies, aligning with prior research findings [
8].
Advocacy, fair compensation, and recognition of nurses’ contributions are essential components of the solution, motivating nurses and acknowledging their critical role in patient care [
35]. Further qualitative research is warranted to better understand the contextual factors and consequences of NNTs experienced by nursing staff and students [
36]. Additionally, the development of instruments measuring the complexity of NNTs is crucial for comprehensive assessment, as highlighted by Grosso et al. (2019) [
5]. This study contributes valuable insights from a Jordanian context, emphasizing the importance of tailoring solutions to specific cultural and contextual factors.
Addressing NNTs is crucial for improving nursing care quality and nurse well-being. The study underscores the importance of clear task assignments, accountability mechanisms, and well-defined job descriptions to prevent NNTs from encroaching on nurses’ workloads. Strategies such as adequate staffing and resource allocation are deemed critical for mitigating the burden of NNTs, necessitating system-level changes to address underlying resource constraints. Moreover, efforts to clarify nursing duties and distinguish them from tasks assigned to other healthcare providers are essential. Nursing students’ expressions of concern regarding these distinctions underscore the need for early education on task delineation to prevent confusion in the future workforce. Furthermore, developing nurses’ assertiveness and activating nursing unions emerged as pivotal strategies in advocating for nurses’ rights and influencing healthcare policies. Encouraging nurses to assert their identity and rights aligns with recommendations for continuous support to strengthen nursing identity, as highlighted in previous studies.
The findings of this study resonate with previous research on NNTs and their impact on nurses, particularly in terms of the challenges and negative consequences associated with these tasks. Similar to studies conducted in Western countries [
5,
37,
38], our research identified task ambiguity, role confusion, and increased workload as significant challenges faced by nurses when performing NNTs. These issues were consistently highlighted by our participants, who reported that the ambiguity surrounding their roles often led to inefficiencies and reduced job satisfaction. Furthermore, like the findings of previous studies [
1,
5], our study noted that engaging in NNTs significantly detracted from the time and energy nurses could devote to direct patient care, thus impairing the quality of care provided. Moreover, our study expands on the existing literature by providing insights into the specific types of NNTs encountered by nurses in Jordan and their unique impacts within this regional context. While the types of NNTs identified, such as administrative duties and clerical work, align with those found in studies from other regions
6,16,21,30, our research highlights the compounded effects of NNTs in a resource-limited healthcare system. The diverse sample from various hospital settings in Jordan revealed that nurses often bear additional burdens due to systemic inefficiencies and staff shortages, which are more pronounced compared to some Western healthcare systems [
30,
31,
38]. This study thus contributes to the global understanding of NNTs by demonstrating that, while the nature of these tasks and their impacts are universally challenging, the specific context of a country’s healthcare infrastructure can exacerbate these issues, calling for tailored interventions that address both local and universal aspects of nursing practice.
Overall, while this study offers valuable insights into the challenges and potential solutions regarding NNTs among Jordanian nurses, further research, particularly qualitative investigations, is warranted to fully understand the contextual factors and consequences of NNTs for nurses globally. Advocacy, fair compensation, and recognition are essential for motivating nurses and acknowledging their critical role in patient care, underscoring the need for continued efforts in this area.
Research implications and recommendations
The examination of NNTs within the nursing profession reveals a multifaceted challenge requiring a comprehensive approach for resolution. Research findings, including those from Uneken (2018), underscore the critical link between NNTs and patient care quality [
39]. Increased NNTs correlate with decreased perceived care quality and a rise in missed care, highlighting the direct impact on patient outcomes when nurses are burdened with tasks beyond their core responsibilities. Solutions proposed in the literature, such as advocacy for fair compensation and recognition of nurses’ contributions, emphasize the need for organizational change prioritizing patient-centered care over NNTs. Purohit and Vasava (2017) suggest restructuring care models to enable inter-professional collaboration, ultimately alleviating NNT burdens by assigning tasks more efficiently [
8].
For nurse managers, understanding the root causes of NNTs within the Jordanian healthcare system provides insights to develop evidence-based strategies for alleviation. Insights from studies by Grosso et al. (2019) and Ayasreh et al. (2022) inform nurse managers in creating more efficient work environments and optimizing nursing resources to improve care quality [
1,
5]. By addressing NNT challenges proactively, nurse managers can enhance operational efficiency and care quality, ultimately benefiting both nurses and patients [
16,
38].
Policy makers and decision-makers in the healthcare sector can leverage the findings of this research to guide the development of policies and the allocation of resources, effectively addressing the prevalence and impact of NNTs in Jordan. By aligning new policies with empirical evidence, they can optimize the use of nursing resources, thereby enhancing patient outcomes [
7,
22]. This evidence-based approach allows healthcare institutions to implement targeted reforms that reduce the burden of NNTs on nurses. Such reforms could lead to more patient-centered care, stronger safety protocols, and increased operational efficiency [
40,
41]. As healthcare systems evolve in response to these findings, patients can expect a higher standard of care, with nurses able to focus more on direct patient care, resulting in better overall experiences and outcomes. The reduction of NNTs not only improves job satisfaction and productivity among nurses but also ensures that healthcare delivery is more efficient and effective, ultimately benefiting the entire healthcare system [
3].
Research limitations
One potential limitation of this study is the reliance on self-reporting through interviews, which may introduce bias or inaccuracies in participants’ responses. Additionally, the study’s focus on Jordanian nurses may limit the generalizability of findings to nurses in other cultural or healthcare contexts. Furthermore, the qualitative nature of the study may restrict the ability to quantify the prevalence or severity of NNTs experienced by nurses. Moreover, the study’s cross-sectional design may capture only a snapshot of participants’ experiences and may not fully capture changes over time. Lastly, the sample size and recruitment method could affect the representativeness of the findings, as it may not encompass the full spectrum of experiences among Jordanian nurses.
Conclusion
The study comprehensively examined NNTs experienced by Jordanian nurses, revealing significant challenges and proposing solutions. It found that NNTs, ranging from administrative duties to tasks outside their official roles, strain nurses’ workload and compromise patient care. Organizational interventions such as clearer job descriptions and adequate staffing are crucial to address NNT challenges effectively.
The study highlights the importance of organizational interventions to mitigate the burden of NNTs. Clearer job descriptions and enhanced communication channels are proposed solutions to alleviate challenges associated with NNTs. Additionally, adequate staffing and resource allocation are essential for reducing the frequency of NNTs and optimizing nursing roles, ensuring better patient care delivery. Moreover, the study emphasizes the role of nurse advocacy and recognition in influencing healthcare policies. By advocating for their rights and asserting their identity, nurses can contribute to improving patient care quality and enhancing their professional satisfaction. Overall, the study provides valuable insights for policymakers, nurse managers, and healthcare organizations to optimize nursing roles and foster a supportive work environment for Jordanian nurses.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.