nach oben

Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Übersicht über bestehende Literatur: (Literatur) Reviews

verfasst von : Valentin Ritschl, Lisa Sperl, Tanja Stamm, Peter Putz, Agnes Sturma

Erschienen in: Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten und Schreiben

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Wenn das Ziel eines Forschungsprojekts darin besteht, sich mit bereits bestehender Literatur kritisch auseinanderzusetzten, dann eignen sich dafür unterschiedliche Formen von Literaturstudien und Reviews. Dieses Kapitel gibt einen Einblick in die verschiedenen Arten von Reviews, wie z. B. systematische Reviews, Meta-Analysen und Scoping Reviews, sowie in deren Durchführung und ihre Bedeutung als eigenständige Forschungsmethode.

Vorheriges Kapitel Quantitative Forschung

Nächstes Kapitel Weitere Forschungsmethoden

Al-Nawas B, Baulig C, Krummenauer F (2010) Von der Übersichtsarbeit zur Meta-Analyse – Möglichkeiten und Risiken. Zeitschrift für zahnärztliche Implantologie 26(4):400–404

Angell BJ, Muhunthan J, Irving M, Eades S, Jan S (2014) Global systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of indigenous health interventions. PloS One 9(11):e111249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111249

Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):19–32

Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volmink J (2008) Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol 8(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21

Bagayoko ND, Brockmeier SF (2012) Current controversies in the management of lateral epicondylitis. Curr Orthop Pract 23(5):480–485. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0b013e31825aa6e3

Barroso J, Gollop CJ, Sandelowski M, Meynell J, Pearce PF, Collins LJ (2003) The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. West J Nurs Res 25(2):153–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945902250034

Bellini JL, Rumrill PD (2009) Research in rehabilitation counseling: a guide to design, methodology, and utilization, 2 Aufl. Charles C Thomas, Springfield

Blackwood D (2016) Taking it to the next level: Reviews of sytematic reviews. HLA News(Winter 2016):13

Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis, 1 Aufl. Wiley, Chichester

Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A (2012) Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage, London

Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, Chichester. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386

Breuer J, Piso B (2013) Ergotherapie bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Literaturübersicht zu Indikationen, Inanspruchnahme und Empfehlungen. HTA-Projektbericht, Nr. 70. Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Helth Technology Assessment, Wien

Case-Smith J, Arbesman M (2008) Evidence based review of intervention for autism used in or of relevance to occupational therapy. Autism Res Treat 62(4):416–429

Chandler J, Cumpston M, Thomas J, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Clarke MJ (2022) Chapter I: Introduction. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (Hrsg) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2022

Chang Y, Phillips MR, Guymer RH, Thabane L, Bhandari M, Chaudhary V (2022) The 5 min meta-analysis: understanding how to read and interpret a forest plot. Eye (London, England) 36:673–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01867-6

Cooper HM, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (Hrsg) (2019) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Scott SJ (2013) Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol 13(48):1–9

De Souza M, Da Silva M (2010) Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? Einstein 8(1 Pt 1):102–106. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082010rw1134

DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

Dixon L, Duncan D, Johnson P, Kirkby L, O’Connell H, Taylor H, Deane KHO (2007) Occupational therapy for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3):CD002813

Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ et al (2006) How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qual Res 6(1):27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867

Eden J (Hrsg) (2011) Finding what works in health care; Standards for systematic reviews. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

Egger M, Schneider M, Davey Smith G (1998) Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 316:140–144. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140

Egger M (Hrsg) (2009) Systematic reviews in health care; Meta-analysis in context. BMJ Books, London

Fitzgerald SM, Rumrill PD (2005) Quantitative alternatives to narrative reviews for understanding existing research literature. Work (Reading, Mass.) 24:317–323

Gough D (2007) Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Res Pap Educ 22(2):213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189

Greenhalgh T (2000) Einführung in die Evidence-based Medicine; Kritische Beurteilung klinischer Studien als Basis einer rationalen Medizin. Huber, Bern

Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R (2005) Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Mede 61(2):417–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001

Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P (2013) Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. J Fam Med Prim Care 2:9–14. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.109934

Hedges H, Cooper LV (2009) Research synthesis as a scientific process. In: Hedges H, Cooper LV, Valentine JC (Hrsg) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, S 4–16

Hewitt G, Sims S, Harris R (2014) Using realist synthesis to understand the mechanisms of interprofessional teamwork in health and social care. J Interprof Care 28(6):501–506. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.939744

Higgins JPT, Green S (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, Chichester https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712184

Higgins JPT, Green S (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 1 Aufl. Wiley, Chichester

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 327:557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (2019) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, Hoboken

Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (Hrsg) (2022) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2022

Jesson J, Matheson L, Lacey FM (2011) Doing your literature review: traditional and systematic techniques. Sage, London

Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G (2003) Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med 96:118–121. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.96.3.118

Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G (2013) Systematische Übersichten und Meta-Analysen: ein Handbuch für Ärzte in Klinik und Praxis sowie Experten im Gesundheitswesen. Springer, Heidelberg

Lang R, O’Reilly M, Healy O, Rispoli M, Lydon H, Streusand W et al (2012) Sensory integration therapy for autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Res Autism Spectrum Disord 6(3):1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.01.006

Laulan J, Fouquet B, Rodaix C, Jauffret P, Roquelaure Y, Descatha A (2011) Thoracic outlet syndrome: definition, aetiological factors, diagnosis, management and occupational impact. J Occup Rehabil 21(3):366–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9278-9

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Sci 5(69):1–9

Liao C-D, Wu Y-T, Tsauo J-Y, Chen P-R, Tu Y-K, Chen H-C, Liou T-H (2020) Effects of protein supplementation combined with exercise training on muscle mass and function in older adults with lower-extremity osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Nutrients 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12082422

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 6(4):W

Muka T, Glisic M, Milic J, Verhoog S, Bohlius J, Bramer W, Chowdhury R, Franco OH (2020) A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol 35:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5

Mühlhauser I, Lenz M, Meyer G (2011) Development, appraisal and synthesis of complex interventions – a methodological challenge. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 105(10):751–761 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2011.11.001

NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2001) Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews; CRD Report 4

Noblit GW, Hare RD (1988) Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985000

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K (2005) Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res & Policy 10 Suppl 1:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308530

Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA (2014) A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 5(4):371–385

Ritschl V (2015) Fall prevention through assistive devices among elderly persons – a systematic review. FH Campus Wien

Ritschl V, Stamm TA, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JWJ, Böhm P, Dragoi R, Dures E, Estévez-López F, Gossec L, Iagnocco A, Negrón JB, Nudel M, Marques A, Moholt E, Skrubbeltrang C, Van den Bemt B, Viktil K, Voshaar M, Carmona L, de Thurah A (2020) Prevention, screening, assessing and managing of non-adherent behaviour in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: systematic reviews informing the 2020 EULAR points to consider. RMD Open 6(3):e001432. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001432

Ritschl V, Ferreira RJO, Santos EJF, Fernandes R, Juutila E, Mosor E, Santos-Costa P, Fligelstone K, Schraven L, Stummvoll G, Salvador M, Poole JL, van den Ende C, Boström C, Stamm TA (2021) Suitability for e-health of non-pharmacological interventions in connective tissue diseases: scoping review with a descriptive analysis. RMD Open 7(2):e001710. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001710

Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM (2001a) Using narrative literature reviews to build a scientific knowledge base. Work 16(2):165–170

Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM (2001b) Using narrative literature reviews to build a scientific knowledge base. Work: A J Prevent, Assess Rehabil 16(2):165–170

Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR (2010) Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work 35(3):399–404. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/20364059

Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR (2010) Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work 35(3):399–404

Saini M, Shlonsky A (2012a) Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. Oxford University Press, New York

Saini M, Shlonsky A (2012b) Systematic synthesis of qualitative research, 1 Aufl. Oxford University Press

Sedgwick P (2013) Meta-analyses: how to read a funnel plot. BMJ 346:f1342–f1342. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1342

Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M (2011) Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol 11(1):15

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, Moher D, Tugwell P, Welch V, Kristjansson E, Henry DA (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 358:j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng H-Y, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

Tierney JF, Vale C, Riley R, Smith CT, Stewart L, Clarke M, Rovers M (2015) Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their Use. PLoS medicine 12:e1001855. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001855a

Tudur Smith C, Marcucci M, Nolan SJ, Iorio A, Sudell M, Riley R, Rovers MM, Williamson PR (2016) Individual participant data meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses based on aggregate data. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:MR000007. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000007.pub3

von Elm E, Schreiber G, Haupt CC (2019) Methodische Anleitung für Scoping Reviews (JBI-Methodologie). Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 143:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2019.05.004

Walsh D, Downe S (2005) Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research : a literature review. J Adv Nurs 50(2):204–211

Whittemore R, Knafl K (2005) The integrative review: Updated methodology. J Adv Nurs 52(5):546–553

Whittmore R (2005) Combining evidence in nursing research: methods and implications. Nurs Res 54(1):56–62

Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R (2013) RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine 11(1): 20

Yu C-H, Mathiowetz V (2014a) Systematic review of occupational therapy – related interventions for people with multiple sclerosis. Part 1: activity and participation. Am J Occup Ther 68(1):27–32

Yu C-H, Mathiowetz V (2014b) Systematic review of occupational therapy-related interventions for people with multiple sclerosis. Part 2: impairment. Am J Occup Ther 68(1):33–38

Zänger H, Ritschl V (2014) Analyse der Reliabilität und Anwendung von Goniometern zur Erstellung von Anwendungsempfehlungen für die ergotherapeutische Praxis – ein systematischer Review. Ergoscience 9(1):12–23

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S, Akl EA, Chang C, McGowan J, Stewart L, Hartling L, Aldcroft A, Wilson MG, Garritty C, . . . Straus SE (2018) PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7):467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Titel: Übersicht über bestehende Literatur: (Literatur) Reviews
verfasst von: Valentin Ritschl
Lisa Sperl
Tanja Stamm
Peter Putz
Agnes Sturma
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten und Schreiben
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-66500-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-66501-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66501-5_8

Springerpflege

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten