This study aimed to investigate the impact of the work environment, emotional intelligence, and empathy fatigue on nurse presenteeism and to examine the mediating roles of emotional intelligence and empathy fatigue.
Methods
This study employed a cross-sectional research design and conducted a questionnaire survey from April to July 2024 among 1,375 nurses (aged 18–24, 25–34, 35–44, and ≥ 45 years) from six tertiary hospitals in Henan Province. The questionnaire included demographic characteristics, the Nursing Practice Environment Scale, the Emotional Intelligence Scale, the Empathy Fatigue Scale, and the Stanford Presenteeism Scale. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 27.0 and AMOS 26.0. A structural equation model was constructed, and the Bootstrap method was employed to assess the mediating effects.
Results
The average presenteeism score among nurses was 19.49 ± 5.910. A partial mediation effect exists among the four variables: work environment, emotional intelligence, empathy fatigue, and nurse presenteeism. Specifically, the nursing work environment not only directly negatively influences nurse presenteeism but also indirectly affects it through the mediating roles of emotional intelligence and empathy fatigue. Furthermore, emotional intelligence and empathy fatigue serve as a chain mediator between the work environment and nurse presenteeism.
Conclusion
The results indicate that the nursing work environment not only directly affects nurse presenteeism but also indirectly influences their presenteeism through emotional intelligence and empathy fatigue. These findings provide theoretical support and guidance for reducing nurse presenteeism rates, emphasizing the importance of optimizing the nursing work environment, enhancing emotional intelligence, and alleviating empathy fatigue in nursing practice.
Hinweise
Yiqiu Zhang and Yongkang Fu share first authorship.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Background
The prevalence and complexity of presenteeism have drawn significant attention within the nursing field, establishing it as a critical focus in both academic research and healthcare management [16, 70]. Presenteeism refers to employees continuing to work despite physical or psychological health issues, rather than taking time off [37, 52]. This issue is particularly pronounced in the nursing profession, where studies indicate that nurses exhibit significantly higher presenteeism rates compared to other occupational groups, such as managerial professionals—with reported rates up to three to four times greater [56, 69]. Moreover, due to differences in culture, healthcare systems, nurse-to-patient ratios, and workplace policies across countries lead to significant variations in nurse presenteeism rates [42, 44, 50, 58]. For example, in Sweden, the highly unionized healthcare system provides nurses with greater autonomy, resulting in a presenteeism rate of 54% [38]. In contrast, in Saudi Arabia, factors such as job insecurity and punitive measures discourage nurses from taking leave, leading to a higher presenteeism rate of up to 70.6% [3].
Unlike traditional absenteeism, presenteeism is more difficult to detect and manage [40]. Although nurses remain physically present at work, their compromised health can mask serious underlying issues and systemic occupational risks, leading to wide-ranging negative consequences for individuals, patients, and healthcare organizations [60]. Firstly, presenteeism results in significant productivity losses, placing a considerable financial burden on healthcare institutions. A study in the United States estimated that nurses lose approximately $37.3 billion annually in productivity due to presenteeism [35]. Secondly, it is strongly linked to burnout and stress, which can further exacerbate presenteeism, creating a vicious cycle [61, 74]. Moreover, presenteeism poses a serious threat to patient safety, as it is associated with poor outcomes such as missed care, patient falls, disease transmission, epidemic spread, medication errors, and inefficiency [20, 35, 57, 71]. Alarmingly, research has shown that presenteeism correlates with an increased risk of patient mortality, presenting a critical challenge to the quality of care and patient safety [44].
Anzeige
Although numerous studies have explored the issue of presenteeism, most have focused on general occupational groups, such as corporate employees and teachers [31]. Existing research on nurse presenteeism has primarily focused on organizational factors, such as staffing levels and workload, while exploration of the mediating mechanisms underlying nurse presenteeism behavior remains insufficient. [1, 46]. Therefore, it is crucial to further explore the nurse presenteeism rate and its influencing factors.
The nursing work environment has been identified as a significant predictor of presenteeism, exhibiting a negative correlation [22]. The concept of the nursing work environment refers to the combination of physical, organizational, and social factors that affect nurses' ability to perform their duties effectively. These factors include staffing levels, leadership quality, workplace culture, and resource availability. A U.S. survey revealed that work-related stress, poor leadership, limited opportunities for professional development, and work-life imbalance are strongly associated with presenteeism[2]. The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) has long emphasized the importance of a healthy work environment in enabling nurses to provide optimal care, as it enhances job satisfaction and reduces burnout [64]. In a healthy work environment, nurses experience lower levels of burnout and turnover, greater job satisfaction, and reduced presenteeism [18, 33]. As the frontline providers of patient care, nurses are essential to maintaining patient safety and care quality [9, 41]. However, the unique nature of nursing, which involves human-centered tasks with low substitutability, high demands, limited autonomy, and significant pressure, coupled with the ethical responsibilities of the profession, makes nurses less likely to take sick leave, even when unwell [68]. Therefore, studying the relationship between the nursing work environment and presenteeism helps provide a multidimensional perspective to understand the predictors of nurse presenteeism.
Emotional intelligence refers to the ability to recognize, understand, regulate, and effectively utilize both one's own emotions and those of others [7]. According to the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, work environment factors can be classified into two categories: job demands (e.g., workload, stress) and job resources (e.g., emotional intelligence, peer support). When job demands exceed available resources, negative outcomes such as burnout and presenteeism may occur. A healthy nursing work environment, characterized by safety, empowerment, and job satisfaction, directly enhances nurses' ability to manage emotions by offering emotional support and fostering effective communication [48]. Moreover, reasonable workloads and stress management strategies provided in such environments help nurses cope with emotional pressure and improve their emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence, as a key job resource [21, 24], plays a vital role in nursing practice [54]. It is essential for enhancing nursing efficiency and acts as a protective factor against psychosocial risks [62]. Emotional intelligence improves both physical and mental health, boosts job satisfaction and engagement, reduces burnout, and lowers presenteeism rates. Research indicates that individuals with higher emotional intelligence are more adept at recognizing, understanding, and managing their emotions, thereby mitigating the negative impact of stress on health [80]. Additionally, these individuals exhibit stronger coping strategies and adaptability and tend to maintain work engagement rather than opting for presenteeism, thereby avoiding the consequences of presenteeism.
Empathy fatigue is an emotional depletion experienced by caregivers, social workers, and other helping professionals due to prolonged exposure to the pain and stress of others [11]. The increasing complexity of healthcare, the intense interpersonal interactions required in nurses' daily tasks [45], excessive psychological demands, and workplace stress can exacerbate emotional exhaustion, particularly in settings with insufficient resources or weak support systems, leading to a higher incidence of empathy fatigue [43]. Unhealthy work environments not only deprive nurses of necessary rest and recovery time but also increase their emotional burden in dealing with patient suffering. When combined with cumulative burnout, empathy fatigue intensifies [14]. However, due to a sense of responsibility and commitment to their patients, nurses often continue working instead of taking time off to rest. This behavior, characterized by working while ill or emotionally depleted, raises the incidence of presenteeism, ultimately affecting nurse performance and patient safety. Overall, an empowering work environment can alleviate compassion fatigue by providing decision-making autonomy and emotional support, helping nurses manage emotional stress more effectively [30]. This, in turn, reduces stress-related presenteeism caused by compassion fatigue, ultimately impacting the quality of care and patient safety. Therefore, addressing compassion fatigue is essential for reducing presenteeism and improving the overall quality of care."
Anzeige
Emotional intelligence plays a critical role in mitigating compassion fatigue. A study conducted in Uganda on psychotherapists revealed that the four key components of emotional intelligence—social awareness, self-awareness, self-management, and social skills—are negatively correlated with levels of compassion fatigue [28]. This suggests that healthcare professionals with higher emotional intelligence are better equipped to manage their emotions, maintain emotional stability, and exhibit psychological resilience when faced with patients' suffering, thereby preventing emotional overinvestment and reducing the occurrence of compassion fatigue [51]. Emotional intelligence enables nurses to more effectively identify and regulate their emotions in response to emotional stress, decreasing the incidence of emotional exhaustion and enhancing their adaptability in high-pressure environments. As a result, they are better able to employ positive coping strategies to manage work-related stress. In this way, emotional intelligence serves as a buffer, significantly reducing compassion fatigue caused by emotional depletion, thus protecting the mental health and work performance of nurses.
In conclusion, although an increasing number of people recognize that emotional intelligence and empathy fatigue are important factors influencing nurse presenteeism, research on their mediating role between the nursing work environment and presenteeism remains limited. Therefore, this study will explore the relationship between nursing work environment, emotional intelligence, empathy fatigue and nurses' presenteeism rates. We propose the conceptual framework (see Fig. 1) and hypotheses for this study: (1) the nursing work environment is negatively associated with nurses' presenteeism; (2) emotional intelligence mediates the relationship between the nursing work environment and nurses' presenteeism; (3) compassion fatigue mediates the relationship between the nursing work environment and nurses' presenteeism; and (4) emotional intelligence and compassion fatigue jointly mediate the link between the nursing work environment and nurses' presenteeism.
Fig. 1
Conceptual framework and hypothesis
×
Method
Sample
A cross-sectional survey study was conducted using c3le in six tertiary hospitals in Henan Province between April and July 2024. Inclusion criteria were: (1) registered nurses holding a valid nursing qualification certificate, and (2) those who provided informed consent and voluntarily participated in the study. Exclusion criteria included nurses who were absent due to personal or medical leave during the survey period. The researchers first coordinated with the management and department heads of each participating hospital to obtain the necessary permissions and support. Based on this, questionnaires were distributed directly to nurses in their workplaces, organized by department, to ensure a smooth data collection process. The research team collected all questionnaires within the designated time frame and conducted an initial check for completeness and quality, ensuring data accuracy and reliability. Questionnaires with duplicate entries or missing data were deemed invalid. A total of 1,611 questionnaires were distributed, with 1,375 valid responses, resulting in an effective response rate of 85.4%.
Measures
Nursing work environment
The Practice Environment Scale of Nursing prepared by Lake [32] revised by Wang [67] was used to assess the nurses' work environment. The scale consists of 31 entries and contains five dimensions, including nurses' participation in hospital affairs, high-quality nursing care, managers' competence and leadership styles, adequate human and material resources, and healthcare cooperation. The scale was scored on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4, with a higher total score representing a better nursing work environment. (Cronbach's α = 0.91).
Emotional intelligence
The Emotional Intelligence Scale developed by Wong et al. and revised into the Chinese version by Wang was used [72]. The scale consists of 16 items and contains four dimensions: self-monitoring of emotions, recognition of others' emotions, emotion regulation, and use of emotions. The scale is scored on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5, and is divided into 5 levels, ranging from “not at all consistent” to “completely consistent”. The higher the total score, the higher the level of emotional intelligence. (Cronbach's α = 0.83).
Empathic fatigue
The Chinese version of the Compassion Fatigue Scale, developed by Stamm [63] and revised by Zheng [79], was used to assess nurses' empathy fatigue. The scale has 30 entries and contains 3 dimensions empathic satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. The scale is scored on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores on the empathy satisfaction subscale indicate that the nurse is more satisfied with his/her empathy; higher scores on the burnout subscale mean that the nurse is at higher risk of burnout; and higher scores on the secondary traumatic stress subscale indicate that the nurse may need to examine how he/she feels about his/her job and work environment. (Cronbach's α = 0.71).
Presenteeism
The Chinese version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale, translated and revised by Zhao in 2010 (F. [77]), was used, which has 6 entries, of which entries 5 and 6 reverse scoring contain 2 dimensions including work constraints and work energy, using a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. The higher the total score, the higher the degree of presenteeism of nurses, and the higher. (Cronbach's α = 0.76).
Data analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 27.0 and AMOS 26.0. Descriptive statistics were presented as mean ± standard deviation (x̅ ± s), while categorical data were expressed as frequencies and percentages (%). Skewness and kurtosis were assessed to evaluate the normality of continuous variables, confirming that the data followed a normal distribution. The t-test, ANOVA, χ2 test, and Pearson’s correlation analysis were conducted for statistical comparisons. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed in AMOS 26.0 to evaluate the construct validity of the measurement model. The mediating effects were examined using structural equation modeling (SEM) in AMOS 26.0. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The demographic characteristics of the participants
Among the 1,375 nurses included in the study, 345 (25.1%) were male and 1,030 (74.9%) were female. The age distribution showed that 813 nurses (59.1%) were 25 years old or younger, 392 (28.5%) were between 26–35 years, 124 (9.0%) were between 36–45 years, and 46 (3.4%) were older than 45 years. Regarding marital status, 1,105 (80.4%) were unmarried, while 249 (18.1%) were married, and 21 (1.5%) were divorced or widowed. In terms of education, 243 (17.7%) held an associate degree, 899 (65.4%) had a bachelor's degree, and 233 (17.0%) held a master's degree or above. Employment relationships varied, with 198 (14.4%) being permanent staff, 640 (46.5%) contractual staff, and 537 (39.1%) classified under other employment categories. Participants worked in various departments, including internal medicine (287, 20.9%), surgery (204, 14.8%), gynecology (82, 6.0%), pediatrics (65, 4.7%), emergency (66, 4.8%), and other specialties (671, 48.8%). Regarding professional titles, 1,127 nurses (82.0%) were classified as nurses or assistant nurses, 144 (10.5%) as nurses-in-charge, and 104 (7.6%) as associate chief nurses or above. Further details are provided in Table 1.
Table 1
Demographic characteristics of the participants (N = 1375)
Variables
n
%
Gender
Men
345
25.1
Women
1030
74.9
Age
≤ 25
813
59.1
26 ~ 35
392
28.5
36 ~ 45
124
9.0
> 45
46
3.4
Marital status
Unmarried
1105
80.4
Married
249
18.1
Divorced/Widowed
21
1.5
Highest level of education
Associate Degree
243
17.7
Bachelor's Degree
899
65.4
Master's Degree or Above
233
16.9
Employment Relationship
Permanent Staff
198
14.4
Contractual Staff
640
46.5
Other
537
39.1
Department
Internal Medicine
287
20.9
Surgery
204
14.8
Gynecology
82
6.0
Pediatrics
65
4.7
Emergency
66
4.8
Other
671
48.8
Title
Nurse or Assistant Nurse
1127
82.0
Nurse-in-Charge
144
10.5
Associate Chief Nurse or Above
104
7.5
Years as a nurse (years)
≤ 2
918
66.8
3 ~ 5
233
16.9
6 ~ 10
119
8.7
11 ~ 15
43
3.1
> 15
62
4.5
Night shifts per month
0 ~ 3 times
629
45.7
4 ~ 6 times
470
34.2
≥ 7 times
276
20.1
Average monthly income (RMB)
< 4000
668
48.6
4000 ~ 6000
385
28.0
6001 ~ 8000
169
12.3
> 8000
153
11.1
Measurement model assessment
The measurement model was evaluated through multiple reliability and validity indicators, including factor loadings, Cronbach’s \(\alpha\), composite reliability (CR), average variance extracted (AVE), discriminant validity, and model fit indices. Reliability and internal consistency were considered acceptable when factor loadings exceeded 0.6, AVE was greater than 0.5 [23], and both Cronbach’s \(\alpha\) and CR surpassed 0.7 [25]. The results presented in Table 2 confirm that the constructs met these established benchmarks, ensuring robust reliability and convergent validity.
Table 2
Standardized loadings and reliabilities
Construct
Indicators
Standardized Loading
Cronbach’s α
CR
AVE
Nursing Work Environment
NWE1
0.86
0.99
0.78
0.95
NWE2
0.90
NWE3
0.88
NWE4
0.87
NWE5
0.90
Emotional Intelligence
SEA
0.91
0.97
0.80
0.94
ROE
0.89
UOE
0.87
OEA
0.91
Empathy Fatigue
Compassion satisfaction
0.84
0.96
0.56
0.79
Secondary traumatic stress
0.71
Burnout
0.68
Presenteeism
Work limitations
0.89
0.92
0.67
0.80
Work energy
0.74
NWE1 nurse participation in hospital affairs, NWE2 nursing foundations for quality of care, NWE3 nurse manager ability, leadership, and support of nurses, NWE4 Staffing and Resource Adequacy, NWE5 Collegial Nurse–Physician Relations, SEA self-emotional appraisal, ROE regulation of emotion, UOE use of emotion, OEA others’ emotional appraisal
Pearson’s correlation analysis
Table 3 presents the means and standard deviations of the variables examined. The presenteeism score of the nurses was 19.49 ± 5.91, the nursing work environment score was 86.39 ± 22.09, the emotional intelligence score was 52.51 ± 14.55, and the empathy fatigue score was 96.01 ± 20.82.
Table 3
Descriptive statistics of study variables (N = 1375)
Variables
Mean
Standard deviation
Nursing Work Environment
86.39
22.09
Emotional Intelligence
52.51
14.55
Empathy Fatigue
96.01
20.81
Presenteeism
19.49
5.91
Correlation analysis revealed that the nursing work environment was significantly positively correlated with nurses' emotional intelligence (r = 0.62, p < 0.01) and significantly negatively correlated with both empathy fatigue (r = −0.43, p < 0.01) and presenteeism (r = −0.30, p < 0.01). Additionally, emotional intelligence was negatively correlated with empathy fatigue (r = −0.37, p < 0.01) and presenteeism (r = −0.33, p < 0.01), while empathy fatigue was positively correlated with presenteeism (r = 0.32, p < 0.01). See Table 4 for details.
Table 4
Correlation analysis of study variables (N = 1375)
Variables
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
NWE1
1
NWE2
.94**
1
NWE3
.93**
.95**
1
NWE4
.93**
.93**
.93**
1
NWE5
.91**
.94**
.92**
.91**
1
Nursing Work Environment
.98**
.98**
.97**
.96**
.95**
1
SEA
.56**
.60**
.59**
.56**
.59**
.59**
1
ROE
.51**
.54**
.52**
.50**
.53**
.53**
.74**
1
UOE
.55**
.58**
.57**
.54**
.57**
.57**
.78**
.81**
1
OEA
.55**
.59**
.57**
.54**
.57**
.58**
.77**
.74**
.82**
1
Emotional Intelligence
.59**
.63**
.62**
.58**
.62**
.62**
.91**
.90**
.93**
.91**
1
Compassion satisfaction
-.28**
-.29**
-.30**
-.28**
-.30**
-.30**
-.21**
-.14**
-.13**
-.22**
-.19**
1
Secondary traumatic stress
-.37**
-.39**
-.40**
-.37**
-.39**
-.39**
-.36**
-.32**
-.33**
-.32**
-.37**
.44**
1
Burnout
-.42**
-.45**
-.46**
-.43**
-.45**
-.45**
-.40**
-.38**
-.38**
-.40**
-.43**
.75**
.72**
1
Empathy Fatigue
-.41**
-.43**
-.44**
-.41**
-.43**
-.43**
-.36**
-.31**
-.31**
-.36**
-.37**
.86**
.80**
.95**
1
Work limitations
-.28**
-.29**
-.27**
-.27**
-.28**
-.29**
-.29**
-.26**
-.30**
-.27**
-.30**
.24**
.26**
.30**
.30**
1
Work energy
-.25**
-.26**
-.25**
-.23**
-.24**
-.25**
-.28**
-.26**
-.31**
-.27**
-.31**
.20**
.25**
.29**
.28**
.62**
1
Presenteeism
-.30**
-.30**
-.29**
-.29**
-.30**
-.30**
-.32**
-.28**
-.33**
-.29**
-.33**
.25**
.28**
.32**
.32**
.96**
.81**
1
NWE1 nurse participation in hospital affairs, NWE2 nursing foundations for quality of care, NWE3 nurse manager ability, leadership, and support of nurses, NWE4 Staffing and Resource Adequacy, NWE5 Collegial Nurse–Physician Relations, SEA self-emotional appraisal, ROE regulation of emotion, UOE use of emotion, OEA others’ emotional appraisal
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (two-tailed)
Anzeige
Mediating effect analysis
The mediating role of nurses' emotional intelligence and empathy fatigue between the nursing work environment and presenteeism was assessed using structural equation modeling (SEM) in AMOS 26.0. The model used the nursing work environment score as the independent variable, emotional intelligence, and empathy fatigue as mediating variables, and presenteeism as the dependent variable. Nurses’ gender, years of experience, and number of night shifts were included as control variables. The model demonstrated good fit (χ2/df = 4.09, RMSEA = 0.047, CFI = 0.984, TLI = 0.81). As depicted in Fig. 2, the nursing work environment positively predicted emotional intelligence and negatively predicted empathy fatigue and presenteeism. Emotional intelligence negatively predicted empathy fatigue and presenteeism, while empathy fatigue positively predicted presenteeism.
Fig. 2
Mediating roles of emotional intelligence and empathy fatigue in the relationship between nursing work environment and presenteeism. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
×
The mediating effects were further tested using the bias-corrected percentile bootstrap method with 5,000 replications. Confidence intervals that did not include 0 indicated significant mediation effects. Table 5 shows that the nursing work environment affected presenteeism through the following pathways:
None of the confidence intervals included 0, supporting all four hypotheses.
Discussion
This study constructed a structural equation model to examine the relationship between the nursing work environment and nurse presenteeism, as well as the roles of emotional intelligence and compassion fatigue. The findings indicate that the nursing work environment, nurses' emotional intelligence, and compassion fatigue are all significantly related to nurse presenteeism. Mediation analysis revealed that both emotional intelligence and compassion fatigue serve as significant mediators in the relationship between the nursing work environment and presenteeism.
Anzeige
In this study, the presenteeism score of nurses in Henan Province was 19.49 ± 5.910, significantly lower than those of nurses in Croatia (21.3 ± 4.5) and Turkey (26.46 ± 52.39), but higher than the scores reported for nurses in Sichuan Province and Beijing, China. These differences may be attributed to variations in work stress, health support systems, and cultural factors across countries and regions. For instance, Turkey has a relatively low nurse-to-patient ratio, and the nursing profession endures long-term high-intensity work pressure with limited professional support mechanisms, making nurses more vulnerable to presenteeism in high-stress work environments [6]. In contrast, eastern regions of China, such as Beijing, benefit from more abundant medical resources, leading to reduced professional stress and improved work environments for nurses. However, in central regions like Henan Province, although the healthcare system has developed in recent years, challenges remain in enhancing nurse staffing and improving work environments, which may contribute to the relatively higher presenteeism scores observed [66].
This study identified a significant negative correlation between nursing work environment scores and nurse presenteeism scores, supporting Hypothesis 1. This finding aligns with previous research conducted in other populations. Studies have highlighted that participation in decision-making is a key factor influencing nurses' work motivation [4]. Additionally, psychosocial work factors—such as job stress, perceived workload, burnout, job satisfaction, and health status—have been shown to predict nursing quality [65]. Authentic nurse leadership has been found to reduce turnover, enhance psychological resilience, and improve nurses' overall well-being. Collectively, these healthy work environment factors can significantly lower nurse presenteeism rates. Research also indicates that common reasons for presenteeism among healthcare providers include the desire not to burden colleagues, a strong sense of responsibility toward patients, and the need to avoid future increased workloads due to presenteeism [26]. These findings underscore the importance of adequate healthcare resources, standardized nursing practices, and a manageable perceived workload in preventing presenteeism. To address this issue, hospitals should establish nursing committees that involve nurses in discussions regarding the formulation of nursing policies and process improvements. Furthermore, workloads should be appropriately distributed based on nurses' work intensity, skill levels, and scheduling preferences to avoid excessive concentration of tasks. Finally, offering more career development opportunities, such as promotion pathways and mentorship programs, can enhance the nursing work environment and reduce presenteeism.
This study demonstrates that the nursing work environment is positively associated with nurses' emotional intelligence and negatively associated with presenteeism. An improved nursing work environment enhances emotional intelligence in nurses, which, in turn, contributes to a reduction in presenteeism rates, hypothesis 2 was tested [22]. This finding aligns with previous research, which identifies emotional intelligence as a key factor in improving nursing quality and work efficiency, effectively reducing presenteeism [55]. A safe and efficient nursing work environment fosters supportive management, effective resource allocation, and greater professional autonomy and development opportunities, which, in turn, enhance nurses' self-management abilities [15]. In such optimized environments, nurses have easy access to the emotional support and resources essential for their roles, enabling them to manage complex tasks and improve emotional regulation skills, ultimately fostering the comprehensive development of emotional intelligence [34]. It is well established that nurses face numerous stressors at work, including personal challenges, long hours of standing, workplace violence, bullying, the demanding nature of their tasks, patient care responsibilities, and interactions with patients in need [13, 47]. These challenges require strong emotional management, stress-coping strategies, and interpersonal communication skills. Nurses with high emotional intelligence are better equipped to manage psychological stress, serving as a buffer against burnout and mental health issues caused by emotional strain, thereby reducing presenteeism [62]. As a result, the work environment indirectly influences nurses' mental health and job performance by enhancing emotional intelligence, a mechanism that helps reduce presenteeism [29]. The research findings suggest that hospitals should enhance the work environment for nurses by providing adequate resources, manageable workloads, and effective team communication mechanisms. Furthermore, emotional intelligence training should be integrated into nurses' continuing education programs through diverse formats, including online learning and workshops. This strategy ensures that nurses continuously develop their emotional intelligence at various stages of their careers. Nursing department leaders should promote regular assessments of nurses' emotional awareness, emotional management, and emotional communication skills. By quantifying this data, nurses can obtain a clear understanding of their current emotional intelligence levels and identify areas for improvement. Previous studies have also highlighted emotional intelligence as a critical psychological resource for long-term success, supporting its inclusion in nursing education programs to build a solid foundation for future nursing professionals [8, 19].
The results of the study confirmed that empathy fatigue was a mediating variable between the nursing work environment and nurses' presenteeism, indicating that a better work environment leads to lower levels of compassion fatigue, which in turn reduces presenteeism [12, 39], validating Hypothesis 3. This finding aligns with previous research. Nurses face significant challenges in modern healthcare, including increasing occupational stress [49]. Nursing requires sustained empathy in dealing with patients’ pain and anxiety, but prolonged emotional engagement can negatively impact nurses themselves [75]. Behnke’s study suggests that when nurses care for trauma survivors, their own traumatic memories may be reactivated, causing emotional discomfort [5]. Without adequate support or resources in the work environment, this emotional burden is more likely to develop into compassion fatigue, which can lead to secondary traumatic stress. In such instances, nurses may experience fatigue, weakened immunity, pain, anxiety, depression, difficulty concentrating, emotional exhaustion, and frustration, all of which can impair sleep quality (Y. [78]). When nurses' emotional investment, job satisfaction, psychological resilience, and work engagement are undermined by compassion fatigue [53], their presenteeism tends to increase [17]. A well-structured psychosocial work environment, characterized by thoughtful work organization and task content, can have a positive impact on nurses' health and well-being [76]. According to emotional regulation theory [27], hospitals and nursing institutions should offer psychological counseling and emotional management training, such as mindfulness meditation, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), and emotional regulation techniques like cognitive restructuring. These interventions help nurses recognize and manage their emotional responses, thereby mitigating the long-term impacts of emotional labor. Additionally, hospitals should allocate nursing resources based on patient volume and care complexity to ensure manageable workloads. Increasing the number of nursing staff or support personnel can further distribute the workload, reducing stress and minimizing the risk of compassion fatigue.
Anzeige
This study identified a chain mediation effect involving emotional intelligence and compassion fatigue in the relationship between the nursing work environment and nurse presenteeism, hypothesis 4 was tested. This finding highlights the significant impact of the nursing work environment on nurses' psychological well-being and professional behavior and deepens our understanding of how emotional intelligence mitigates the challenges associated with nursing work. Optimizing the work environment not only reduces work-related stress and presenteeism directly but also enhances nurses' emotional intelligence [10], enabling them to better manage and regulate emotional stress at work [73]. Emotional intelligence, as an important individual resource, helps nurses deal with complex emotional labor and also enhances their psychological resilience in the face of professional emotional challenges [13, 36]. This mechanism underscores the crucial role of emotional intelligence in professions with high emotional demands. Furthermore, there is a significant association between emotional intelligence and compassion fatigue. Increased emotional intelligence effectively reduces the incidence of compassion fatigue and serves as a buffer when compassion fatigue arises [59]. This dual mechanism—where an improved work environment boosts emotional intelligence, which in turn reduces compassion fatigue, and subsequently, compassion fatigue affects presenteeism—illuminates the dynamic interactions among the nursing work environment, emotional intelligence, compassion fatigue, and presenteeism. Consequently, the identification of this chain mediation effect provides valuable insights for nursing management. Future research should focus on developing comprehensive intervention strategies to address emotional labor and compassion fatigue, aiming to improve nurse presenteeism and ultimately enhance the quality of nursing services and patient satisfaction.
Limitations
The study possesses some limitations. First, as a cross-sectional study, it only examines the relationship between variables at one point in time, which limits our ability to determine causality or how these relationships might change over time. Future research should use longitudinal or experimental designs to explore these dynamics more thoroughly. Second, the study focused on nurses in a specific region, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. A broader study including different regions and healthcare settings is needed to confirm the results more widely. Finally, the study relied on self-reported data, which can introduce bias. Future research should consider using objective measures or third-party assessments to provide more accurate and reliable data.
Conclusion
This study examined the nursing work environment, nurses' emotional intelligence, empathy fatigue, and presenteeism. A chain mediation model was developed to investigate the mechanisms through which the nursing work environment influences presenteeism among nurses. The results revealed that emotional intelligence and empathy fatigue served as mediators in the relationship between the nursing work environment and presenteeism. These findings offer theoretical support and practical guidance for research and interventions focused on reducing presenteeism among nurses, which is crucial for enhancing their well-being and improving the quality of care.
Implications for practice
Addressing nurse presenteeism is essential to maintaining a resilient healthcare workforce. At the national policy level, governments should implement policies that ensure adequate staffing, financial support, and occupational protections for nurses, including competitive salaries, benefits, and mandated rest periods to mitigate presenteeism. Healthcare organizations must enhance work environments by promoting manageable workloads, ensuring access to mental health resources, and providing emotional support systems. Investments in training programs that develop nurses' emotional intelligence and resilience are crucial in reducing burnout and empathy fatigue. Hospital leadership should cultivate organizational fairness and offer well-defined career development opportunities. Ensuring open communication channels for emotional support is equally important. At the individual level, nurses should prioritize self-care and engage in continuous professional development, focusing on emotional well-being and resilience. Peer support and mentorship programs are valuable in helping nurses manage the emotional demands of their profession and prevent presenteeism. These multilevel interventions are essential for reducing nurse presenteeism and ensuring enhanced patient care outcomes.
Acknowledgements
We are deeply grateful to all the participants and organizations who made this study possible. Special thanks to our colleagues at Henan University for their valuable feedback and continuous support throughout the research process.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Henan University School of Nursing and Health Sciences (Approval ID: HUSOM 2022–375). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant institutional guidelines. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Clinical trial number
Not applicable.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.