Methods
A quasi-experimental “the non-equivalent control group pre-post test design” was used in this study. Quasi-experimental studies encompass a broad range of nonrandomized intervention studies. These designs are frequently used when it is not logistically feasible or ethical to conduct a randomized controlled trial. However, in many quasi-experimental studies there may be nonrandom selection of units to both controls and experimentals, and it is not necessarily the same selection variable that governs the selection process for controls and experimentals [
25]. The clinical learning model was divided into two locations that involved all students at each institution; therefore, a full experimental design was not possible. Continuity of care was applied to students in the experiment group. Each student followed 2–3 women during pregnancy until postpartum. Students were supported by a midwife tutor linked to their clinical area throughout their clinical experience, and were supervised by a school midwife sign-off mentor. The control group only used the conventional model of fragmented care learning.
In 2014, there were a total of 800 Midwifery schools across Indonesia with total student numbers of approximately 240.000. We selected two Midwifery schools for this study based on similarity of accreditation level, characteristics of curriculum, and number of students. To avoid testing effect, the selected schools were approximately 1500 km (3 hours by plane) apart, thereby decreasing the likelihood that students at both schools would communicate with each other [
25]. There was no significant difference in socio-demographic characteristics between the location of the two schools in terms of similarity of languages, tribes, and income. The subjects of this study were all final year midwifery students: 54 students from one school who attended the 6 month clinical placement using a CoC learning model and 52 students from the other school as the control group who underwent a fragmented care learning model. A nonrandomized selection (based on socio-demographic characteristics) was used to determine the sample size at two location that it represented general populations of midwifery students accross Indonesia.
This CoC learning model was delivered to the participants in the experiment group using the CoC learning module (see Additional file
1). This module was produced by the author and involved all parties (students, clinical midwives, midwife teachers and delegations from local midwifery association) [
26].
The pre and post-survey questionnaires were comprised of five sections (see Table
1), administered to the students in both groups before and after the study. The first five sections contained questions related to the students’ understanding of the midwifery care philosopy during the clinical experience: (1) personalized care, (2) holistic care, (3) partnership care, (4) collaborative care, and (5) evidence based care. The data reported in this article related to the students’ understanding of midwifery care philosopy “Women-Centred Care” experienced during the clinical placement.
Table 1
Materials of questions and topics asked for students’ understanding of midwifery care philosophy “women-centred care”
Personalized care | - Students’ experience gained during clinical practice concerning their understanding of women’s needs. | 5 |
- Students’ comprehension about the difference of each woman’s needs that students give a midwifery care. |
- Students’ experience about offering a helping hand to the woman who has a special need. |
- Students’ experience how to recognise every woman’s right to self‑determination in attaining choice of care for woman herself. |
Holistic care | Students’ understanding concerning a holistic approach and recognition to each woman’s social, emotional, physical, spiritual and cultural needs, expectations and context as defined by the woman herself | 3 |
Partnership care | - Students’ mean of partnership with women to give the necessary support, care and advice during pregnancy, labour and the postpartum period. | 4 |
- Students’ understanding how the midwives provide women with appropriate information and advice in a way that promotes participation and facilitates informed decision making. |
Collaborative care | - Students’ understanding how the midwives take a dicision to referral in a timely manner when problems arise on their client during pregnancy, birth, and the postpartum period. | 3 |
- Students’ understanding on how the midwife is expected to continue providing supportive care after transfer and be going to resume primary care if appropriate. |
Evident-based care | Students’ ability to inform and give midwifery care based on scientific evidence that they know. | 3 |
Total | 18 |
The development of the questionnaire was done using references from the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) [
1,
6]. The five aspects of women-centred care philosopy was than adapted into 18 questionnaire items by the research team, followed by consultation on the appropriateness, relevance and readability of the questionnaire to the professional groups relevant to midwifery education (18 Institutional Lecturers, 13 Clinical Midwives, and 2 experts from Indonesia Midwifery Association) by two times focus group discussion.
The questionnaire was administered to both groups in their first week of the programme and six months after completing the study. The Cronbach’ alpha for the questionnaires was 0.754, meaning that all items are reliable [
25]. Pre-test questionnaire and consent forms were distributed to students one week prior to the commencement of the study. Students were informed about the voluntary nature of the study and assured of confidentiality and anonymity. To enable matching of pre- and post-test data, students were asked to generate their own identification code using a combination of their birthday initials. Students completed and returned the questionnaire during the session. A second questionnaire was given to students when they returned to the school following their clinical experience. Again, the questionnaire was distributed and collected during a lecture held at the school. All students completed both the pre-test and post-test surveys. This was a 100% response rate. The quantitative data were analysed using SPSS, and the independent sample t-test was conducted.
Ethical considerations
The study was conducted after approval had been obtained from Gadjah Mada University Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref: KE/FK/812/EC). In addition, permission to conduct the study was obtained from Director of the School of Midwifery. All participants were informed of the objective and design of the study and a written consent received from the participants to participate on the study. Staff members who did not have a direct power relationship with the student on their course took consent. Prior to clinical placement, consent was obtained from patients willing to participate in the study.
Discussion
We found that the CoC clinical learning model increased students’ understanding of midwifery care philosopy to a higher level compared to the fragmented care model. This finding suggests that students who use a CoC clinical learning model understand how to give better midwifery care based on the midwifery care philosophy during their clinical practices. Learning through relational continuity of care is important for promoting personal growth for the midwifery students and therefore they are in a better position to offer holistic care. Students in the CoC learning groups showed more understanding about midwifery care philosophy than those in the fragmented care learning model. Continuity of care in the relationship with women and the practices of holistic midwifery care seems to be more satisfying for students, and enhances their self-confidence as midwives [
14].
In this study we also found that students in both groups were significantly better in understanding the five aspects of midwifery care philosophy (Table
2). However, students in the CoC learning groups had a significantly better understanding than the control group. Therefore, the CoC learning model provides a more meaningful educational impact than the fragmented learning model. Possibilities for this include the more intensive and longer relationships between the students and the women during all phases of pregnancy, labor and post delivery, and/or the improvement in comprehension of the midwifery care philosophy into practice.
Previous studies have shown that students identified the importance of providing care and support in a meaningful and woman-focused manner from early pregnancy throughout the childbearing period, and explained that this was a valuable learning experience [
16,
20,
27,
28]. A study by Seibold [
22] reported that students experienced a personal transformation and rated their follow up experience as highly valuable. This study found that providing this experience to all midwifery students enabled them to better understand all aspects of midwifery care philosophy,
Our study showed that a CoC clinical learning model provided opportunities for the students to practise women-centred care. It was the students’ presence and focus upon women which empowered the women in this study.
In relation to changes following the clinical experience, all students who implemented the CoC learning model felt more competent and satisfied. This indicated that the students developed their skills and care practices during the experience and consequently were satisfied with the practicum. The importance of clinical experience for competence and skill development has been reported in the literature [
22]; our study confirms the importance of clinical experience for ongoing student development. It is interesting to note that the competence and satisfaction of students using the CoC learning model improved in this study. The results suggest that clinically following women during pregnancy, childbirth and post partum enabled students to gain appropriate and satisfiying learning experiences. This study indicates that there should be no hesitation in adopting a CoC clinical learning model to enable midwifery students to develop relevant skills and competence.
This study also confirmed the elements of midwifery care philosophy that contributed most to a positive learning experiences for students. Consistent with other research [
14,
16,
22,
28,
29], these elements were related to supporting students obtain their learning, by being a part of a midwifery care team, and thus feeling valued. The findings strongly suggested which aspects of health care agencies fostered not only the development of students’ confidence and competencies, but also students’ understanding of midwifery care philosophy. It is vital that stakeholders in clinical education ensure that the clinical learning model not only recognise these issues but also have the relevant structures in place to support learning. This should include providing diverse experiences and recognizing students as valued members of the health care team.
There are many benefits associated with the CoC learning model in midwifery care [
30]. The CoC learning model in midwifery care is based on the premise that pregnancy and birth are normal, women-centered life events. It is assumed that the underpinning philosophy of midwifery care is based upon the natural ability of women to experience birth with minimum or no routine intervention. The CoC model of care offers greater relationship continuity by ensuring that childbearing women receive their ante-, intra- and postnatal care from one midwife or her/his practice partner. In our study, the CoC learning model that was offered to the students gave additional benefits, such as early detection and prompt treatment for high risk pregnancies. Of the 108 women who participated in this study, there was zero maternal mortality at the end of the CoC learning model implementation. Therefore, through the CoC model of care that is implemented in midwifery care system, it is in line with targets 4 & 5 of MDGs to reduce maternal and infant mortality.
This study has also been producing a 6 month CoC learning module for a three year midwifery education programe. The CoC experience is designed for midwifery students to be aligned with women, so that they are embedded in the practices in the community and daily service provision. Furthermore, the CoC experience is intended to provide midwives who adopt continuity of care and a women-centred care philosophy as their ideal for future professional practice. However, as previously studies in our study identified, continued exposure to midwifery practices offers great benefits to students in developing their own personal midwifery identity and philosophy.
Study limitations and recommendations
While this study reported that the CoC learning model resulted in many educational benefits, student accessibility issues such as cost, transportation and accommodation are important aspects that should be taken into account. This suggests that certain background factors must be addressed in order for students to consider a CoC clinical placement.
Further study should address concurrent improvement in care practices or other relevant skills in the CoC clinical experience. We suggest that longer periods of clinical practice may be required with the CoC learning model to optimize student opportunities for developing relevant skills and competence.
Although only the students’ understanding of midwifery care philosophy was analyzed in this study, the findings demonstrated that further research should be continued to understand student competence and skills. This will further strengthen the midwifery curriculum and contribute positively to the women-centred care that underlies midwifery practices.
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Y contributed to the conceptual and practical design of the study, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and the composition of the first draft of the manuscript. MC and OE contributed to the conceptual design of the study, manuscript review and editing. MH conceived of and participated in the design of this study and contributed to revisions to this manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Y is a midwifery lecturer at Estu Utomo Boyolali School of Health Sciences, Undergraduate Program of Midwifery Education in Indonesia. She is a PhD student in Gadjah Mada University, Jogjakarta. MC is a staff member in the Medical Education Department and Graduate Program of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Jogjakarta. OE is a staf member of Medical Education Department and the Ob-gyn Department Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Jogjakarta. MH is a a staf member of the Ob-gyn Department Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University.