Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2025 | Research

Social alienation and related factors in patients with head and neck tumors undergoing radiotherapy: a cross-sectional study

verfasst von: Zhuoran Gao, Siyu Li, Xinghua Bai

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2025

Abstract

Background

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients suffer from a series of complications due to changes in body image caused by radiotherapy, resulting in patients’ unwillingness to participate in society and a strong sense of social alienation. Social alienation not only affects the physical and mental health and quality of life of individuals but also increases the pressure on the families and society of HNC patients, which may lead to a series of social problems. Therefore, this study explores social alienation in patients with HNC treated at our center and analyses its influencing factors, to provide a basis for the development of relevant nursing interventions.

Methods

In this study, 236 patients with HNC who were treated in a tertiary hospital in northeast China from September 2023 to June 2024 were investigated by a convenient sampling method. The survey was conducted using general demographic information, the General Alienation Scale (GAS), the Fear of Progress Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF), the Self-Perceived Burden Scale (SPBS), and the Social Support Scale (SRSS). Data were collected by paper scale. The data were processed by SPSS26.0 software, and the influencing factors of patients’ social alienation were analyzed by single-factor analysis and multiple linear regression. The writing process of this article follows the STROBE principle.

Results

The total GAS score of patients with radiotherapy for HNC was 33.45 ± 5.77, which was in the upper-middle level. Fear of disease progression and self-perceived burden were significantly positively correlated with social alienation (r = 0.414, p < 0.01; r = 0.422, p < 0.01), and social support was significantly negatively correlated with social alienation (r=-0.342, p < 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that retirement (β = 0.156, p < 0.01), education level (β=-0.123, p = 0.029), number of radiotherapy treatments (β = 0.120, p = 0.033), fear of disease progression (β = 0.228, p < 0.01), self-perceived burden (β = 0.228, p < 0.01), and social support (β=- 0.222, p < 0.01) were the main influences on social alienation in radiotherapy patients with HNC (t value is -3.894 to 3.252, p < 0.05), explaining 31.9% of the total variance.

Conclusion

The social alienation in patients undergoing radiotherapy for HNC is at a moderately high level. Clinical medical staff should pay attention to the social alienation of HNC patients, pay more attention to patients who are in the retirement stage, with low education level and undergoing radiotherapy. By alleviating patients’ fear of disease progression, reducing self-perceived burden, and enhancing social support, healthcare providers can effectively reduce their level of social alienation.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.
Begleitmaterial
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12912-025-02932-1.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a general term for malignant tumors occurring above the clavicle region defined according to the anatomical location of the human body, with squamous cell carcinoma accounting for more than 90% of the cases, and long-term exposure to tobacco, tobacco products, and alcohol is an important factor in its pathogenesis [1]. HNC ranks seventh among the most common malignant tumors worldwide. There are about 650,000 new cancer cases and 350,000 cancer deaths worldwide every year, and the 5-year survival rate is less than 50% [2]. Among them, China is a big country with HNC, with an annual incidence rate of about 15.34/100,000, accounting for about 10% of systemic malignant tumors [3].
Currently, depending on the TNM stage and primary site, the treatment modalities for HNC include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and a combination of multiple therapeutic modalities (e.g., targeted therapy, immunotherapy), of which the integrated treatment is dominated by the combination of surgery and radiotherapy [1]. In recent years, with the progress at the medical level, especially the development of precision radiotherapy technology, the clinical outcomes of HNC have been significantly improved. But simultaneous radiotherapy and chemotherapy, while improving the survival rate of patients, also bring great economic burden as well as a series of toxic side effects such as nausea and vomiting, oral mucositis, pain, malnutrition, and changes in body image [46], seriously affecting patients’ quality of life and psychological health, leading to patients’ reluctance to participate in society and increased social alienation(SA). The state of SA not only affects the physical and mental health and survival quality of individuals but also increases the pressure on the family and society of patients with HNC, which can lead to a series of social problems.
SA (Social alienation) refers to a state in which an individual or groups are alienated from the original collective and its social network relationships, isolated from others, unwillingness to participate in society, and experiencing negative coping behaviors such as indifference, avoidance, and accompanied by negative emotions such as loneliness and meaninglessness [7]. Studies have shown that cancer patients belong to a high-risk group for SA, with approximately 27–33% of cancer patients self-reporting SA [8]. SA not only affects the physical and mental health of patients and increases the risk of death from cancer, but also triggers a series of family and social problems, such as family estrangement, lack of family communication, poor family adaptation, and social dysfunction, which aggravates the burden of care on families and society [9]. A previous study showed that nasopharyngeal cancer patients have psychological problems such as SA and social discrimination [10]. A study led by Cai showed that patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma experienced loneliness, embarrassment, and stigma due to the change in body image [11], and these heavy physical and psychological burdens inevitably affect the rehabilitation of patients. SA not only affects the cancer recurrence rate and long-term survival rate but also becomes one of the biggest barriers for cancer survivors to return to society [12]. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively analyze the difficulties faced by radiotherapy patients with HNC in returning to and participating in society and to find out the key factors affecting the patients’ SA, which is very important for formulating effective strategies to improve the management quality of SA.
Based on the fear-avoidance model developed by Newell [13], it is evident that patients’ social avoidance behaviors are predominantly driven by a psychological state of fear stemming from changes in appearance and function. Fear and avoidance constitute a form of conditioned reflex, sustained by learned cognitions that continually remind individuals of their perceived defects. In the case of HNC patients, complications arising from radiotherapy, such as body image disturbance [14], can induce this fear and avoidance. If patients are unable to effectively adjust their perception and acceptance of these bodily defects, they may persist in exhibiting social avoidance tendencies. Therefore, studying patients’ fear of disease progression can help nurse practitioners deeply analyze the potential and important influencing factors of SA of HNC patients and understand the avoidance behavior of patients, to guide the nursing practice of SA. McPherson referred to the excessive worry that cancer patients experience due to the impact of their illness and care needs on others, resulting in feelings of guilt, frustration, and burden, as self-perceived burden (SPB) [15]. SPB not only leads to a wide range of negative emotions and stress, but also adversely affects patients’ quality of life and mental health, and influences treatment decisions and prognosis [16]. Therefore, the study of patients’ sense of SA from the perspective of patients’ SPB can deeply reveal the internal psychological motivation of SA, provide an important starting point for formulating effective intervention measures, and have great significance for improving the quality of life and mental health of patients with HNC. Self-perceived burden also suggests the importance of social support [17]. By meeting patients’ social support needs, we can effectively reduce their SPB and promote their integration with society. One scholar has distilled the SA experience of cancer patients into three themes, one of which is patients’ desire for support (reliance on family support, gratitude to friends for support, and urgent need for professional support) [18]. Another study pointed out that the reason for patients’ SA was the lack of social support [19]. Therefore, emotional support, practical support, information support, and social support can help and support patients in different ways so that they can better cope with the disease, reduce SA, and reintegrate into society.
At present, relevant studies on SA for HNC are still in the initial stage in China. Most of the related research focuses on patients with lung cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and other types of cancer [1921], but there are few studies on patients with HNC treated by radiotherapy. Therefore, our research aims to investigate SA in patients with HNC undergoing radiotherapy, analyze the correlation between the fear of disease progression, self-perceived burden, social support, and SA in HNC patients, as well as to identify the influencing factors associated with SA. This study will improve the understanding of SA and its influencing factors in patients with HNC undergoing radiotherapy, and provide a scientific basis for formulating targeted intervention measures to meet the needs of patients returning to society and improve the nursing effect of HNC.

Methods

Design and sample

This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2023 to June 2024 among patients with HNC in a tertiary care hospital in Liaoning Province, China. Participants who met the following criteria were included: (1) patients who have been diagnosed as HNC by pathology or histology and are preparing or undergoing radiotherapy; (2) age ≥ 18 years old; (3) the patients know their condition; (4) conscious, with normal reading and comprehension skills and communication ability; (5) voluntarily participated in this study and gave informed consent. Exclusion criteria: (1) combined with other serious internal, surgical, infectious, and other major diseases (such as cardiac, pulmonary, renal insufficiency, serious infections); (2) serious cognitive, consciousness disorder, or mental disorder.
According to the statistical variable analysis Kendall’s [22] sample size estimation method, was calculated according to the sample size of at least 5–10 times the number of variables. Through the literature review, a total of 24 predictive influence variables were included in this study, including 14 general demographic variables, and 8 variables involved in three scales. Considering the 20% invalid questionnaire recovery rate, the total sample size for this study ranges from 144 to 288 cases. The final sample size of this questionnaire was determined to be 236. Detailed methodology for sample size calculation was provided in the Supplementary Material. This study was reported using STROBE.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University [2024]19. According to the Declaration of Helsinki, all patients signed an informed consent form, all data were kept confidential, participants had the right to withdraw from the study at any time, and non-participation would not affect their treatment.

Instruments and measures

Questionnaire for general information

The researcher designed the questionnaire by reading a large number of domestic and foreign related literature, synthesizing the influencing factors that may affect patients’ SA, and perfecting it under the guidance of relevant experts. The questionnaire includes demographic information (gender, age, education level, religious belief, marital status, occupational status, family residence, mode of residence, family per capita monthly income and knowledge of the disease, etc.) and clinical disease-related information (primary site of cancer, tumor stage, number of radiotherapy treatments, duration of the disease, recurrence, and combination of other diseases).

General alienation scale

The scale was compiled by Jessor et al. [23], and measured from the aspects of personal role, uncertainty of the meaning of participating in activities, and being isolated by others. Wu Shuang et al. [24] introduced it to China. The scale consists of 4 dimensions, and 15 entries, including alienation from others (entries 1, 4, 7, 8, 12), suspicion (entries 3, 6, 14, 15), self-alienation (entries 9, 10, 11), and meaninglessness (entries 2, 5, 13). Likert4-level scoring method was used, in which items 2, 5, and 13 were scored in reverse, with a total score of 15–60. The higher the score, the more serious the alienation. At present, scholars have used this scale to measure the SA of cancer patients [25]. In this study, the scale of Cronbach’s coefficient was 0.846.

Fear of progress questionnaire-short form

The level of fear of progression in cancer patients was measured using the Fear of Disease Progression Simplified Scale for Patients (FoP-Q-SF), which was simplified by Wu Qiyun [26], and was developed by Mehnert et al. [27] in 2006. The FoP-Q-SF has a total of 12 entries, which can be divided into 2 dimensions: physical health fear (6 entries) and social family fear (6 entries). The scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from ‘never’ 1 to ‘always’ 5. The total score is the sum of the scores of each entry, ranging from 12 to 60. Higher total scores indicate higher levels of fear of cancer recurrence in individuals. A total score of ≥ 34 indicates that the individual’s fear of progression is at a clinically significant level of psychological dysfunction. In this study, Cronbach’s coefficient for the scale was 0.840.

Self-perceived burden scale

It was compiled by Cousineau et al. [28], Wu and Jiang translated [29] to evaluate patients’ self-perceived burden. The scale consisted of 10 entries, including 3 dimensions of physical burden (5 items), emotional burden (4 items) and economic burden (1 item). A 5-point Likert scale was used, in which entry 8 was reverse scored and the rest were positively scored, with a total score of 10–50, with higher scores indicating a higher self-perceived burden on the patient. The Cronbach’s coefficient of the scale in this study was 0.934.

Social support rating scale

The social support rating scale compiled by Xiao [30] is divided into three dimensions: objective support, subjective support, and utilization of social support, with a total of 10 items, which is the sum of the scores of the 10 items. The higher the score, the higher the level of social support. Below 33, social support is low, 33–45 is average, and above 45 is high. The scale has been widely used by many people in China. The research shows that Cronbach’s coefficient of the scale is 0.864, and the reliability is good.

Data collection

Before the formal investigation, researchers received standardized training. During the investigation, after explaining the purpose, benefits, and importance of the study orally and obtaining the informed consent of the patients, the patients were investigated. The researchers distributed questionnaires, and the respondents filled them out by themselves or with the assistance of the researchers. The questionnaires were collected immediately after completion. The researcher checked the questionnaires and asked the patients to complete them if they were incomplete.

Statistical analysis

The data were statistically analyzed by SPSS26.0 software. Normality was tested using skewness and kurtosis scores, with absolute values ≤ 3 indicating a normal distribution [31].The measurement data were expressed by Mean ± SD, and the counting data were expressed by frequency and percentage. T-test or variance analysis was used to analyze the influence of patients’ general data on SA, and Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between SA and the variables. Multiple stepwise regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of SA. Differences were statistically significant when p < 0.05. Before regression analysis, it is necessary to confirm whether the data meets the basic assumptions of regression, including residual normal distribution, linearity, variance homogeneity, multicollinearity, and so on.

Results

Participant characteristics

A total of 236 questionnaires were distributed in this study and 227 questionnaires were validly recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 96.19%. 9 questionnaires with consistent options were deemed unqualified and excluded. Among the 227 patients with HNC, 74.0% (n = 168) were male, 56.8% (n = 129) were 46–64 years old, the largest number of patients with the primary site of cancer was located in the oral cavity and oropharynx, accounting for 34.4% (n = 78), stage IV patients accounted for 54.2% (n = 123), and 69.2% of the patients who had already started radiotherapy (n = 157). Other demographic characteristics are detailed in Table 1. There were significant differences in the total GAS in terms of age, education level, marital status, occupational status, family per capita monthly income, knowledge of the disease, tumor stage, and number of radiotherapy treatments (p < 0.05).
Table 1
General information and univariate analysis of factors influencing SA (n = 227)
Variables
n (%)
Scores of SA
(M ± SD)
t/F
p value
Gender
    
Male
168(74.0)
33.70 ± 5.77
1.070b
0.286
Female
59(26.0)
32.76 ± 5.76
Age
    
≤ 45 years old①
32(14.1)
32.00 ± 6.91
4.162a
①<③*
②<③*
0.017*
46–64years old②
129(56.8)
32.98 ± 5.57
≥ 65years old③
66(29.1)
35.08 ± 5.26
Education
    
Junior high school and below①
124(54.6)
34.22 ± 5.35
3.321a
④<①**
④<②*
0.021*
Senior high school②
45(19.8)
33.78 ± 5.77
Universities and colleges③
27(11.9)
32.44 ± 5.48
Bachelor’s degree or above④
31(13.7)
30.81 ± 6.94
Religious belief
    
Yes
18(7.9)
34.33 ± 5.58
0.673b
0.502
No
209(92.1)
33.38 ± 5.79
Marital status
    
Unmarried①
10(4.4)
29.20 ± 10.18
3.687a
①<②*
①<③**
②<③*
②<④*
0.013*
Married②
192(84.6)
33.38 ± 5.27
Divorced③
15(6.6)
36.80 ± 6.38
Widowed④
10(4.4)
34.20 ± 6.36
Work status
    
On duty①
43(18.9)
31.84 ± 5.90
3.645a
①<③**
0.028*
Unemployed②
93(41.0)
33.11 ± 5.53
Retired③
91(40.1)
34.57 ± 5.79
Family residence
    
City
106(46.7)
33.92 ± 5.56
0.723a
0.486
County and township
42(18.5)
32.79 ± 5.02
Village
79(34.8)
33.18 ± 6.40
Mode of residence
    
Live with family
200(88.1)
33.51 ± 6.01
0.526b
0.601
Live in solitude
27(11.9)
33.07 ± 3.64
Family per capita monthly income
    
<3000yuan①
113(49.8)
34.37 ± 5.14
4.486a
③<①**
0.012*
3000-5000yuan②
73(32.2)
33.25 ± 5.83
>5000yuan③
41(18.1)
31.29 ± 6.76
The primary site of cancer
    
Nasal part
52(22.9)
34.17 ± 5.73
1.722a
0.163
Oral cavity, oropharynx
78(34.4)
32.75 ± 5.68
Neck
36(15.9)
32.78 ± 5.92
Other
61(26.9)
36.43 ± 5.38
Tumor stage
    
I、II①
54(23.8)
31.76 ± 5.44
3.692a
①<③**
0.026*
III②
50(22.0)
33.26 ± 5.99
IV③
123(54.2)
34.28 ± 5.99
Number of radiotherapy treatments
    
Pretreatment①
70(30.8)
32.87 ± 5.81
3.380a
①<④*
②<④**
0.019*
1–10 times②
72(31.7)
32.32 ± 6.03
11–20 times③
38(16.7)
34.18 ± 4.81
21–33 times④
47(20.7)
35.47 ± 5.57
Duration of the disease
    
≤ 1 month
52(22.9)
32.73 ± 5.54
0.420a
0.739
2–3 months
78(34.4)
33.47 ± 5.48
4–6 months
36(15.9)
34.00 ± 6.03
≥ 7 months
61(26.9)
33.72 ± 6.23
Comorbiditiesc
    
No
131(57.7)
34.02 ± 5.87
1.744b
0.083
Yes
96(42.3)
32.68 ± 5.57
Note: Abbreviations: SA = Social Alienation; aANOVA. bt-test. * p < 0.05, **p < 0.01;c Comorbidities with other chronic diseases mainly include: hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus and other chronic diseases

SA status of HNC patients

Table 2 shows the score of SA. The total SA score of HNC patients was 33.45 ± 5.77, which was slightly higher than the middle level. Among the four subscales, the sense of suspicion scored the highest at 2.30 ± 0.50, followed by a sense of alienation from others at 2.20 ± 0.51, a sense of self-alienation at 2.23 ± 0.62, and a sense of meaninglessness dimension scored the lowest at 2.14 ± 0.47.
Table 2
SA scores of HNC patients (n = 227)
Variable
Number of items
Total scores (M ± SD)
Item scores
(M ± SD)
The total score of SA
15
33.45 ± 5.77
2.23 ± 0.38
Alienation from others
5
10.99 ± 2.54
2.20 ± 0.51
Suspicion
4
9.20 ± 1.99
2.30 ± 0.50
Self-alienation
3
6.68 ± 1.87
2.23 ± 0.62
Meaninglessness
3
6.42 ± 1.40
2.14 ± 0.47
Note: SD = standard deviation; SA = Social Alienation

Correlation analysis between SA, fear of disease progression, self-perceived burden, and social support in patients with HNC

Pearson’s correlation coefficients showed that SA was positively correlated with fear of disease progression (r = 0.414, p < 0.01), self-perceived burden (r = 0.422, p < 0.01), and significantly negatively correlated with social support (r = -0.342, p < 0.01) (Table 3).
Table 3
Correlation analysis between SA, fear of disease progression, self-perceived burden, and social support(n = 227)
Influencing factors
Mean ± SD
Alienation from others
Suspicion
Self-alienation
Meaninglessness
The total score of SA
FoP
33.74 ± 11.17
0.402**
0.437**
0.352**
-0.032
0.414**
SPB
30.26 ± 7.83
0.423**
0.498**
0.308**
-0.028
0.422**
SS
39.63 ± 7.30
− 0.294**
− 0.207**
− 0.272**
− 0.184**
− 0.342**
Note: SD = standard deviation; FoP = fear of disease progression; SPB = self-perceived burden; SS = social support; **p < 0.01

Multivariate analysis of SA in patients with HNC

SA among HNC patients was the dependent variable, and significant variables from univariate and correlation analyses were included as independent variables in the regression equation. As shown in Table 4, the covariance diagnostics showed that there was no multicollinearity between the independent variables considering the tolerance of the model < 1 and the variance inflation factor < 5. The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that retirement (p = 0.006), education level (p = 0.029), number of radiotherapy treatments (p = 0.033), fear of disease progress (p = 0.002), self-perceived burden (p = 0.001) and social support (p = 0.000) were the factors influencing SA scores, which explained 31.9% of the total variance in the equation (F = 18.668, p < 0.001).
Table 4
Multiple linear regression analysis of factors influencing SA(n = 227)
Independent variable
B
SE
β
t
p
Tolerance
VIF
(Constant)
30.398
2.600
 
11.692
0.000
  
Fear of disease progress
0.118
0.037
0.228
3.214
0.002**
0.598
1.674
Social support
-0.175
0.045
-0.222
-3.894
0.000**
0.927
1.079
Self-perceived burden
0.168
0.052
0.228
3.252
0.001**
0.611
1.637
Work status (Referred to as on duty)
     
Retired
1.831
0.656
0.156
2.793
0.006**
0.967
1.034
Education
-0.651
0.295
-0.123
-2.204
0.029*
0.964
1.037
Number of radiotherapy treatments
0.621
0.289
0.120
2.150
0.033*
0.975
1.026
Note: B = unstandardized coefficient; SE = standard error; β, standardized coefficient Beta; VIF = variance inflation factor; DW = Durbin − Watson
R = 0.581; R2 = 0.337; adjusted R2 = 0.319; DW = 1.959; F = 18.668, p < 0.001; *p<0.05,**p<0.01

Discussion

In this study, we found that the SA of HNC patients receiving radiotherapy was at the upper-middle level. The main factors that affect SA are occupational status, educational level, number of radiotherapy treatments, fear of disease progression, self-perceived burden, and social support. Some research results show that about 1/3 of nasopharyngeal cancer survivors suffer from radiation cognitive impairment due to normal brain tissue damage caused by radiotherapy, that is, attention, language, or executive ability are impaired [32], which will undoubtedly increase the difficulty of patients’ integration into society, so it is necessary to understand the SA of this group.
The results of this study showed that the total SA score of HNC radiotherapy patients was 33.45 ± 5.77, which was at a moderately high level compared with the total score of 60 on the scale, suggesting that most patients with HNC have a high level of SA, which was consistent with the results of the study by scholars Zhou Yi et al. [33]. The possible reason is that most patients are already in advanced stages at the time of diagnosis, which, coupled with a series of complications of radiotherapy damages the body image of patients, and the change in appearance will cause patients to develop an inferiority complex, thus actively reducing contact with others. At the same time, radiotherapy also affects patients’ speech and swallowing function, and the language barrier makes it difficult for patients to communicate effectively with others, which limits their social activities to a large extent. Moreover, most patients in this study are of working age and are the main source of income for their families. Under the double blow of poor prognosis and loss of their main source of income, they have bad psychology such as self-blame, suspicion, and a sense of meaningless feeling, which leads to SA.
Among the dimensions of SA in this study, the dimension of suspicion scored the highest, followed by self-alienation, other-alienation, and sense of meaninglessness. Suspicion can be used as a psychological defense mechanism to help patients temporarily escape the cruelty of reality. By doubting the diagnosis or treatment, patients can reduce psychological pressure to a certain extent and give themselves some psychological buffer time. In addition, influenced by the mainstream traditional culture of society, most people will show fear or prejudice towards cancer patients. When HNC patients perceive that they are discriminated against or alienated by others, they are prone to negative emotions such as doubt, helplessness, and lack of self-confidence, which alienate them from the surrounding people [34]. However, the sense of self-doubt is also a very painful experience, and individuals will face the process of self-examination and self-denial, patients with high doubt scores experience feelings of despair, depression and even more complex emotional responses. Therefore, medical personnel should attach importance to the sense of SA of patients with HNC, strengthen communication with patients, patiently answer patients’ questions and concerns, eliminate patients’ sense of doubt, establish and improve telemedicine follow-up and social support systems, reduce social prejudice and discrimination against cancer patients, and timely assess the level of SA of patients. At the same time, they can learn from foreign interventions on SA of cancer survivors, such as peer support, narrative therapy, mindfulness training, exercise therapy, and other ways to alleviate patients’ SA [35].
In this study, general demographic data of occupational status, education level, and number of radiotherapy treatments were significant factors affecting SA in HNC patients. The results show that retired patients have the highest sense of SA. This is possibly because patients’ social roles change after retirement, which reduces their self-worth, and coupled with the blow of illness, patients are more likely to doubt themselves, lack self-identity, and lose their original sense of purpose and meaning in life [36]. Work, on the other hand, gives patients a sense of purpose and mission and makes them feel that they are contributing to society. This positive self-perception helps to enhance their self-confidence and sense of value and reduce SA. The results of this study show that the SA of patients is significantly related to their educational level (p < 0.05), which is consistent with the findings results of Fang et al. [25]. This may be due to the fact that patients with higher educational level are more willing and able to utilize relevant resources to participate in social activities [37]. Fierloos et al. [38] also showed that patients with higher levels of education can seek psychological adjustment through more avenues and modalities, have higher levels of awareness of the illness, and are more likely to adopt positive coping styles to face the illness, and thus experience less SA. It is worth noting that the results of this study also show that patients’ SA had a significant difference in the number of radiotherapy treatments (p < 0.05), which is consistent with the report of Agatha [39]. An increase in the number of radiotherapy treatments means that patients are exposed to more radiation doses, which may lead to more physical side effects such as pain, radiation dermatitis, oral mucositis, and fatigue. These physical discomforts will make patients feel pain and weakness, and reduce their ability and willingness to participate in social activities. In addition, as the number of radiotherapy treatments increases, patients may become more concerned about their physical changes and health status [40], and long-term health problems and treatment processes may cause patients to feel their self-esteem is damaged, which in turn make patients more sensitive and isolated, thus increasing SA. Therefore, healthcare professionals should focus on patients who are in the retirement stage, with lower education level and in the late stage of radiotherapy. Retired patients can be encouraged to participate in community activities to reduce their SA, and patients receiving radiotherapy can be encouraged to make full use of online social platforms to keep in touch with other patients at home, share their life moments and obtain emotional support.
Fear of disease progression is closely related to patients’ SA, and the worse patients’ fear of disease progression, the worse their social function [41]. Our study showed that the stronger the fear of disease progression, the higher the sense of SA, which is consistent with that reported by Zhu et al. [42]. Fear of disease progression can lead to negative emotions such as anxiety and depression in patients. These emotional states lead to social withdrawal, further exacerbating patients’ sense of SA. In addition, fear of disease progression may make patients more concerned about their health and less willing to engage in social activities [43]. Even if patients still participate in some social activities, they may not be able to devote themselves wholeheartedly as before because of the physical and mental burden brought by the disease, resulting in a decrease in the quality of social interaction. This decline in quality will make patients feel that they have lost their sense of value in social interaction, which in turn increases SA. It is suggested that nursing staff can strengthen health education for patients and their families, help patients understand the disease in detail, guide them to face the disease correctly, reduce their fear of cancer recurrence, and help them actively cope with the challenges brought by the disease and maintain a good attitude.
Studies have shown that patients with heavy self-feelings burden self-perceived burdens are more likely to adopt negative coping styles, thus reducing daily activities and alienating themselves from social interactions [44]. In this study, there was a significant positive correlation between patients’ self-perceived burden and SA (p < 0.05), which was consistent with the findings of Wang et al. [45]. Patients with HNC may feel guilty and blame themselves because of the cost of treatment, interference with family life, and other factors. They think that they have become a burden on their families. This self-perceived burden will further aggravate their psychological pressure and make them more inclined to isolate themselves and reduce social activities. On the other hand, due to their high self-perceived burden, patients may tend to avoid social activities to reduce the sense of burden caused to others [44]. This social avoidance behavior gradually leads to a reduction in patients’ contact with society, family, and friends, which in turn enhances the sense of SA. Therefore, healthcare professionals must pay close attention to patients’ self-perceived burden, conduct regular assessments, and implement personalized psychological guidance and intervention strategies based on each patient’s specific level of burden.
Social support is the key factor to promote the physical and mental rehabilitation of cancer patients. Relevant research shows that social support is significantly related to the health-related quality of life of cancer patients [46], and good social support can improve the medical behavior of cancer patients and enhance their immune function. This study shows that social support is negatively correlated with patients’ SA, which is consistent with Katherine’s previous report [47]. This is because social support can enhance patients’ psychological resilience, reduce negative emotions, promote patients’ information acquisition and decision-making participation, and enhance their sense of belonging. These factors work together to make patients stronger, and more optimistic in the face of illness, thus reducing SA. A systematic evaluation study by Deckx et al. [48] showed that cancer survivors were prone to loneliness when they lacked psychosocial support. Loneliness is one of the main constitutive factors of SA [49]. Therefore, in clinical work, the social support system of patients should be actively mobilized to provide patients with comprehensive information, resources, and emotional support, to improve their coping ability in the face of stress, reduce the sense of loneliness, alleviate the psychological pressure when socializing, promote social interaction, thereby reducing SA.

Limitations

This study is a cross-sectional design, and it is impossible to infer the causal relationship between variables. In the future, qualitative interviews, and multi-center or longitudinal follow-up can be conducted to study the level of SA and its influencing factors in patients with HNC. This study is a single-center survey, and the sample size and representativeness are insufficient. It is necessary to further study the SA of patients with HNC in other areas of China. In this study, variables in the general information, fear of disease progression, self-perceived burden, and social support only explained for 31.9% of the total variance in patients’ SA. Therefore, it is necessary to further explore other factors influencing patients’ SA, such as psychological resilience and coping mechanisms, to provide a more comprehensive reference for clinical practice. What’s more, this study did not explore the effect of symptomatic distress on patients’ SA. In the future, it is necessary to statistically assess the effect of patients’ cancer-related symptoms such as pain, oral mucositis, malnutrition, anxiety, and depression on patients’ SA. Given the core objectives of this study, future research must delve deeper into the SA of HNC patients during the post-treatment follow-up phase, as this group is more closely associated with the main thrust of the study.

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that the SA of HNC patients in Northeast China was at a moderately high level. Retirement, educational level, number of radiotherapy treatments, fear of disease progression, self-perceived burden, and social support were significant influencing factors. This suggests that healthcare professionals should focus on patients who are retired, have low literacy levels, and are undergoing radiotherapy, pay attention to the dynamic assessment of patients’ SA, strengthen symptom management and psychological care, focus on psychological counseling, formulate intervention strategies to alleviate patients’ negative emotions and promote multidimensional social support so as to reduce patients’ sense of SA.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank all the patients with head and neck tumors who participated in our study as well as the clinical staff for their help and support.

Declarations

This study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of China Medical University (approval number: [2024] 19). All patients signed an informed consent form, all data were assured to remain private, and participants could leave the study at any time.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Anhänge

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mody MD, Rocco JW, Yom SS, Haddad RI, Saba NF. Head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2021;398:2289–99.PubMedCrossRef Mody MD, Rocco JW, Yom SS, Haddad RI, Saba NF. Head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2021;398:2289–99.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Ca-Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.PubMedCrossRef Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Ca-Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Xia C, Dong X, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, He S, et al. Cancer statistics in China and united States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J-Peking. 2022;135:584–90.CrossRef Xia C, Dong X, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, He S, et al. Cancer statistics in China and united States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J-Peking. 2022;135:584–90.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bossi P, Giusti R, Tarsitano A, Airoldi M, De Sanctis V, Caspiani O, et al. The point of pain in head and neck cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hemat. 2019;138:51–9.CrossRef Bossi P, Giusti R, Tarsitano A, Airoldi M, De Sanctis V, Caspiani O, et al. The point of pain in head and neck cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hemat. 2019;138:51–9.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Henry M, Albert JG, Frenkiel S, Hier M, Zeitouni A, Kost K, et al. Body image concerns in patients with head and neck cancer: A longitudinal study. Front Psychol. 2022;13:816587.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Henry M, Albert JG, Frenkiel S, Hier M, Zeitouni A, Kost K, et al. Body image concerns in patients with head and neck cancer: A longitudinal study. Front Psychol. 2022;13:816587.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosi-Schumacher M, Patel S, Phan C, Goyal N. Understanding financial toxicity in patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review. Clin Med Insights-On. 2023;17:1363268690. Rosi-Schumacher M, Patel S, Phan C, Goyal N. Understanding financial toxicity in patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review. Clin Med Insights-On. 2023;17:1363268690.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen MM, Friesen MJ, Ponto JA, Di Tommaso MJ. Social isolation among individuals with Cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2022;26:463–70.PubMed Christensen MM, Friesen MJ, Ponto JA, Di Tommaso MJ. Social isolation among individuals with Cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2022;26:463–70.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams KD, Nida SA. Ostracism and social exclusion: implications for separation, social isolation, and loss. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;47:101353.PubMedCrossRef Williams KD, Nida SA. Ostracism and social exclusion: implications for separation, social isolation, and loss. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;47:101353.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai Y, Zhang Y, Cao W, Hou F, Xin M, Guo VY, et al. Preliminary validation of the Chinese version of the shame and stigma scale among patients with facial disfigurement from nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0279290.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cai Y, Zhang Y, Cao W, Hou F, Xin M, Guo VY, et al. Preliminary validation of the Chinese version of the shame and stigma scale among patients with facial disfigurement from nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0279290.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang F, Gao Y, Han Z, Yu Y, Long Z, Jiang X, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 90 cohort studies of social isolation, loneliness and mortality. Nat Hum Behav. 2023;7:1307–19.PubMedCrossRef Wang F, Gao Y, Han Z, Yu Y, Long Z, Jiang X, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 90 cohort studies of social isolation, loneliness and mortality. Nat Hum Behav. 2023;7:1307–19.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Newell RJ. Altered body image: a fear-avoidance model of psycho-social difficulties following disfigurement. J Adv Nurs. 1999;30:1230–8.PubMedCrossRef Newell RJ. Altered body image: a fear-avoidance model of psycho-social difficulties following disfigurement. J Adv Nurs. 1999;30:1230–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fingeret MC, Teo I, Goettsch K. Body image: a critical psychosocial issue for patients with head and neck cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2015;17:422.PubMedCrossRef Fingeret MC, Teo I, Goettsch K. Body image: a critical psychosocial issue for patients with head and neck cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2015;17:422.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat McPherson CJ, Wilson KG, Murray MA. Feeling like a burden: exploring the perspectives of patients at the end of life. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:417–27.PubMedCrossRef McPherson CJ, Wilson KG, Murray MA. Feeling like a burden: exploring the perspectives of patients at the end of life. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:417–27.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiaodan L, Guiru X, Guojuan C, Huimin X. Self-perceived burden predicts lower quality of life in advanced cancer patients: the mediating role of existential distress and anxiety. Bmc Geriatr. 2022;22:803.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Xiaodan L, Guiru X, Guojuan C, Huimin X. Self-perceived burden predicts lower quality of life in advanced cancer patients: the mediating role of existential distress and anxiety. Bmc Geriatr. 2022;22:803.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen MZ, Chen XL, Xu Q, Cao XD, Wang MY, Cao R. Mediating the role of perceived social support between frailty and Self-Perceived burden in elderly patients with diabetes. Patient Prefer Adher. 2024;18:745–52.CrossRef Chen MZ, Chen XL, Xu Q, Cao XD, Wang MY, Cao R. Mediating the role of perceived social support between frailty and Self-Perceived burden in elderly patients with diabetes. Patient Prefer Adher. 2024;18:745–52.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhaohui D, Huijuan L, Zhenqi L, Xiaoju Z, Yuxia Z. Experiences of social isolation in cancer patients:a qualitative research. Chin J Nurs. 2023;58:670–5. Zhaohui D, Huijuan L, Zhenqi L, Xiaoju Z, Yuxia Z. Experiences of social isolation in cancer patients:a qualitative research. Chin J Nurs. 2023;58:670–5.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Song C, Yao L. The experience of social alienation in elderly lung cancer patients: A qualitative study. Asian Nurs Res. 2024;18:281–287. Song C, Yao L. The experience of social alienation in elderly lung cancer patients: A qualitative study. Asian Nurs Res. 2024;18:281–287.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Coughlin SS. Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 2019;177:537–48.CrossRef Coughlin SS. Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 2019;177:537–48.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Coughlin SS. Social determinants of colorectal cancer risk, stage, and survival: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35:985–95.PubMedCrossRef Coughlin SS. Social determinants of colorectal cancer risk, stage, and survival: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35:985–95.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bacchetti P, Leung JM. Sample size calculations in clinical research. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1028–9.PubMedCrossRef Bacchetti P, Leung JM. Sample size calculations in clinical research. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1028–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jessor R, Jessor S L, ^editors. Problem behavior and psychosocial development: a longitudinal study of youth[M]. New Yourk: Academic; 1977. Jessor R, Jessor S L, ^editors. Problem behavior and psychosocial development: a longitudinal study of youth[M]. New Yourk: Academic; 1977.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Shuang W, Yanzhang L, Xiaolin Z, Qi D, Ling D, Siyi G. Reliability and validity of the generalized social of alienation scale among the elderly. J Chengdu Med Coll. 2015;10:751–4. Shuang W, Yanzhang L, Xiaolin Z, Qi D, Ling D, Siyi G. Reliability and validity of the generalized social of alienation scale among the elderly. J Chengdu Med Coll. 2015;10:751–4.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang X, Ren K, Li Y, Meng Q, Li M, Miao M, et al. Prevalence and influencing factors of social alienation among elderly patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Curr Urol. 2024;18:98–103.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fang X, Ren K, Li Y, Meng Q, Li M, Miao M, et al. Prevalence and influencing factors of social alienation among elderly patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Curr Urol. 2024;18:98–103.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Qi-yun W, Zhi-xia Y, Li L, Pei-yu L. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of fear of progression Questionnaire-Short form for cancer patients. Chin J Nurs. 2015;50:1515–9. Qi-yun W, Zhi-xia Y, Li L, Pei-yu L. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of fear of progression Questionnaire-Short form for cancer patients. Chin J Nurs. 2015;50:1515–9.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehnert A, Herschbach P, Berg P, Henrich G, Koch U. [Fear of progression in breast cancer patients–validation of the short form of the fear of progression questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF)]. Z Psychosom Med Psyc. 2006;52:274–88. Mehnert A, Herschbach P, Berg P, Henrich G, Koch U. [Fear of progression in breast cancer patients–validation of the short form of the fear of progression questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF)]. Z Psychosom Med Psyc. 2006;52:274–88.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cousineau N, McDowell I, Hotz S, Hébert P. Measuring chronic patients’ feelings of being a burden to their caregivers: development and preliminary validation of a scale. Med Care. 2003;41:110–8.PubMedCrossRef Cousineau N, McDowell I, Hotz S, Hébert P. Measuring chronic patients’ feelings of being a burden to their caregivers: development and preliminary validation of a scale. Med Care. 2003;41:110–8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Yanyan J, Yanfang. Investigation and analysis of the self-perceived burden among cancer patients. Joumal Nurs Adm. 2010;10:405–7. Wu Yanyan J, Yanfang. Investigation and analysis of the self-perceived burden among cancer patients. Joumal Nurs Adm. 2010;10:405–7.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao Shuiyuan. Theoretical basis and research application of 《social support rating scale》. J Clin Psychiat. 1994;4:98–100. Xiao Shuiyuan. Theoretical basis and research application of 《social support rating scale》. J Clin Psychiat. 1994;4:98–100.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald RP, Ho MH. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:64–82.PubMedCrossRef McDonald RP, Ho MH. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:64–82.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat McDowell LJ, Ringash J, Xu W, Chan B, Lu L, Waldron J, et al. A cross sectional study in cognitive and neurobehavioral impairment in long-term nasopharyngeal cancer survivors treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2019;131:179–85.PubMedCrossRef McDowell LJ, Ringash J, Xu W, Chan B, Lu L, Waldron J, et al. A cross sectional study in cognitive and neurobehavioral impairment in long-term nasopharyngeal cancer survivors treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2019;131:179–85.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou Yi Y, Li L, Qiuting Y, Xialan Z, Yanxin, Li Jiayan. Social alienation of survivors of nasopharyngeal cancer and its influencing factors. Chin J Prac Nurs. 2023;39:59–64. Zhou Yi Y, Li L, Qiuting Y, Xialan Z, Yanxin, Li Jiayan. Social alienation of survivors of nasopharyngeal cancer and its influencing factors. Chin J Prac Nurs. 2023;39:59–64.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan MH, Fan YY, Zhang JE. Stigma, self-efficacy and late toxicities among Chinese nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors. Eur J Cancer Care. 2022;31:e13528.CrossRef Yan MH, Fan YY, Zhang JE. Stigma, self-efficacy and late toxicities among Chinese nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors. Eur J Cancer Care. 2022;31:e13528.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoang P, King JA, Moore S, Moore K, Reich K, Sidhu H, et al. Interventions associated with reduced loneliness and social isolation in older adults: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Jama Netw Open. 2022;5:e2236676.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hoang P, King JA, Moore S, Moore K, Reich K, Sidhu H, et al. Interventions associated with reduced loneliness and social isolation in older adults: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Jama Netw Open. 2022;5:e2236676.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim-Soh JW, Lee Y. Social participation through the retirement transition: differences by gender and employment status. Res Aging. 2023;45:47–59.PubMedCrossRef Lim-Soh JW, Lee Y. Social participation through the retirement transition: differences by gender and employment status. Res Aging. 2023;45:47–59.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Curvers N, Pavlova M, Hajema K, Groot W, Angeli F. Social participation among older adults (55+): results of a survey in the region of South Limburg in the Netherlands. Health Soc Care Comm. 2018;26:e85–93.CrossRef Curvers N, Pavlova M, Hajema K, Groot W, Angeli F. Social participation among older adults (55+): results of a survey in the region of South Limburg in the Netherlands. Health Soc Care Comm. 2018;26:e85–93.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Fierloos IN, Tan SS, Williams G, Alhambra-Borrás T, Koppelaar E, Bilajac L, et al. Socio-demographic characteristics associated with emotional and social loneliness among older adults. Bmc Geriatr. 2021;21:114.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fierloos IN, Tan SS, Williams G, Alhambra-Borrás T, Koppelaar E, Bilajac L, et al. Socio-demographic characteristics associated with emotional and social loneliness among older adults. Bmc Geriatr. 2021;21:114.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Klaauw AA, Biermasz NR, Hoftijzer HC, Pereira AM, Romijn JA. Previous radiotherapy negatively influences quality of life during 4 years of follow-up in patients cured from acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 2008;69:123–8.CrossRef van der Klaauw AA, Biermasz NR, Hoftijzer HC, Pereira AM, Romijn JA. Previous radiotherapy negatively influences quality of life during 4 years of follow-up in patients cured from acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 2008;69:123–8.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahill A, Al-Nakishbandi H, Cunningham KB, Humphris GM, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Loneliness and quality of life after head and neck cancer. Brit J Oral Max Surg. 2020;58:959–65.CrossRef Dahill A, Al-Nakishbandi H, Cunningham KB, Humphris GM, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Loneliness and quality of life after head and neck cancer. Brit J Oral Max Surg. 2020;58:959–65.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu P, Wu Q, Cheng Y, Zhuo Y, Li Z, Ye Q, et al. Associations of illness perception and social support with fear of progression in young and middle-aged adults with digestive system cancer: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024;70:102586.PubMedCrossRef Liu P, Wu Q, Cheng Y, Zhuo Y, Li Z, Ye Q, et al. Associations of illness perception and social support with fear of progression in young and middle-aged adults with digestive system cancer: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024;70:102586.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu B, Wu H, Lv S, Xu Y. Association between illness perception and social alienation among maintenance Hemodialysis patients: the mediating role of fear of progression. PLoS ONE. 2024;19:e0301666.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhu B, Wu H, Lv S, Xu Y. Association between illness perception and social alienation among maintenance Hemodialysis patients: the mediating role of fear of progression. PLoS ONE. 2024;19:e0301666.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng M, Wang S, Zhu Y, Wan H. A qualitative exploration of fear of progression in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with proton and heavy ion therapy. Support Care Cancer. 2023;31:622.PubMedCrossRef Zheng M, Wang S, Zhu Y, Wan H. A qualitative exploration of fear of progression in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with proton and heavy ion therapy. Support Care Cancer. 2023;31:622.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill EM, Frost A. Loneliness and psychological distress in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer: examining the role of Self-Perceived burden, social support seeking, and social network diversity. J Clin Psychol Med S. 2022;29:195–205.CrossRef Hill EM, Frost A. Loneliness and psychological distress in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer: examining the role of Self-Perceived burden, social support seeking, and social network diversity. J Clin Psychol Med S. 2022;29:195–205.CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang G, Dong J, Zhu N, Zhu Y. Development and validation of a social alienation predictive model for older maintenance Hemodialysis patients based on latent profile analysis-a cross-sectional study. Bmc Geriatr. 2024;24:495.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wang G, Dong J, Zhu N, Zhu Y. Development and validation of a social alienation predictive model for older maintenance Hemodialysis patients based on latent profile analysis-a cross-sectional study. Bmc Geriatr. 2024;24:495.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlton RA, McQuaid GA, Wallace GL. Social support and links to quality of life among middle-aged and older autistic adults. Autism. 2023;27:92–104.PubMedCrossRef Charlton RA, McQuaid GA, Wallace GL. Social support and links to quality of life among middle-aged and older autistic adults. Autism. 2023;27:92–104.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Clifton K, Gao F, Jabbari J, Van Aman M, Dulle P, Hanson J, et al. Loneliness, social isolation, and social support in older adults with active cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022;13:1122–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Clifton K, Gao F, Jabbari J, Van Aman M, Dulle P, Hanson J, et al. Loneliness, social isolation, and social support in older adults with active cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022;13:1122–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Deckx L, van den Akker M, Buntinx F. Risk factors for loneliness in patients with cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18:466–77.PubMedCrossRef Deckx L, van den Akker M, Buntinx F. Risk factors for loneliness in patients with cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18:466–77.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Christiansen J, Lund R, Qualter P, Andersen CM, Pedersen SS, Lasgaard M. Loneliness, social isolation, and chronic disease outcomes. Ann Behav Med. 2021;55:203–15.PubMedCrossRef Christiansen J, Lund R, Qualter P, Andersen CM, Pedersen SS, Lasgaard M. Loneliness, social isolation, and chronic disease outcomes. Ann Behav Med. 2021;55:203–15.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Social alienation and related factors in patients with head and neck tumors undergoing radiotherapy: a cross-sectional study
verfasst von
Zhuoran Gao
Siyu Li
Xinghua Bai
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2025
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2025
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02932-1