Background
Globally, an estimated 17.9 million people lost their lives to CVDs in 2019, with 85% of these deaths attributed to heart attack and stroke [
1]. Despite the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 3.4, which seeks to reduce mortalities occurring from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) among the population across the world by 2030 [
2], cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of death worldwide. In low-and middle-income countries, from which Ghana is not exempt, more than three fourth of CVD deaths are said to occur [
1]. Ghana is already saddled with a high burden of CVDs, ranking as the second cause of mortalities. Yet, despite being a significant public health problem for non-communicable diseases, there is a dearth of literature on cardiac arrest-specific death.
The American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology define sudden cardiac arrest as the sudden cessation of cardiac activity in which victims become unresponsive, have no normal breathing and have no signs of circulation [
3]. For any sudden cardiac arrest, patients have been classified as either suffering an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) or an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) based on the Utstein-style guidelines [
3]. Sudden cardiac arrest is mainly triggered by underlying structural cardiac conditions (ischemic coronary disease, congestive heart failure, cardiac tamponade, left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary artery abnormalities) or nonstructural cardiac conditions (congenital long QT syndrome and Brugada syndrome). Also, several studies suggest that noncardiac conditions such as pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, sepsis, toxic ingestions, and other risk factors such as trauma, intoxication, obesity, and smoking play a significant role in the occurrence of sudden cardiac arrest [
4‐
8] Regardless of the aetiology, immediate emergency services and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have proven successful life-saving interventions during sudden cardiac arrest.
The CPR, a critical component of Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Life Support (ALS) [
9], comprises a series of life-saving interventions (mostly chest compressions and rescue breathing) that improve oxygenation and circulation, thereby increasing the likelihood of survival following a cardiac arrest [
10]. The role of timely, effective and high-quality CPR in patients experiencing sudden cardiac arrest (in-hospital or out-of-hospital setting) cannot be understated. For every minute delay in initiating CPR for a cardiac arrest victim, there is a 7–10% decrease in the chances of survival [
11]. Additionally, effective CPR decreases the length of hospital stay [
12], with about 25.5% of patients discharged alive [
10]. Notwithstanding, both animal and clinical studies suggest that CPR naturally may not be efficient as only up to 30% and 40% of normal blood may be supplied to the heart and brain, respectively, even by adhering to internationally approved guidelines for performing CPR [
13‐
15]. This inefficiency warrants rescuers to provide the highest possible quality CPR care to cardiac arrest victims and other conditions requiring resuscitation.
The works of previous scholars have reported several factors that characterise CPR practice among care providers and how these factors significantly impact the quality of CPR care rendered to patients. In a South African study, symptoms of anxiety, the experience of anger, hatred and heart soreness characterised a failed resuscitation among nurses [
16]. Time of initiating CPR and duration of performing CPR [
17‐
19]; availability of CPR equipment and drugs [
20,
21]; confidence in initiating CPR [
22‐
24] were found among a host of factors to influence the quality of resuscitation practices of rescuers. Additionally, Campwala et al. [
25] reported that “non-medical” factors tied to individual beliefs, attitudes, and values influenced the practice of CPR.
Nurses in the Ghanaian healthcare system spend significant time with patients in the clinical setting. They are often the first to detect and respond to in-hospital cardiac arrests by initiating CPR. Although Ghanaian nurses’ contribution to effective and high-quality CPR, either singly or as a rapid response team member, is pivotal in reducing deaths resulting from cardiac arrest, there is a paucity of empirical literature on the factors influencing the quality of CPR practices among them. To our knowledge, no previous study has been conducted on this subject matter among Ghanaian nurses. With this drawback, we explored nurses’ perspectives concerning the factors influencing the quality of adult resuscitation practices in Ghana. Given the dearth of evidence and the rising need for specialist nurses in emergency nursing in Ghana, a qualitative study was needed to explore nurses’ perceptions regarding the quality of CPR in Ghana. This approach helped us address important questions of “how” and “why” and generate a deeper understanding of the CPR practices and policies in the Ghanaian nursing context.
Conceptual framework of quality of adult CPR practices
Lawton’s quality of life (QoL) model served as this study’s conceptual framework. Initially, the model sought to provide a multidimensional perspective of quality of life in frail elderly [
26] but was later applied in assessing the quality of life in Alzheimer’s [
26] and dementia disease-related studies [
27‐
29]. The model describes four domains: behavioural competence, environmental quality, perceived quality of life, and psychological well-being. According to Lawton [
26], behavioural competence is the evaluated quality of behaviour that by the normative social judgment, is thought to be necessary for adaptation to the external world; environmental quality is measured as quality by physical, social normative, or consensual standards which all lie outside the person; psychological well-being is the subjective evaluation of the total quality of self and the overall way the self relates to the world; and perceived quality of life is the person’s subjective evaluation of the adequacy of the separate domains of life and roles in life.
In the context of this study, all four constructs of Lawton’s model of quality of life have been operationally defined and applied in exploring factors influencing the quality of adult resuscitation practices of nurses working in Ghana. Our study modified the construct of behavioural competence to entail nurses’ attitudes, knowledge, confidence level, skills and their effect on successful resuscitation. Environmental quality in this study pertained to the environmental factors that affect successful resuscitation, including the ability of nurses to work under favourable or unfavourable workplace conditions. We further described nurses’ emotions and feelings during resuscitation and its consequences on them as psychological well-being. Nurses’ perception of the quality of resuscitation, including attitudes of apathy and skill deficiency and how it impacted the quality of resuscitation, aligned to the construct of perceived quality of life. By operationalising the constructs of Lawton’s model of QoL to this study, a better understanding of the concept of quality of life was derived, and most importantly, it served as a guide to the process of setting objectives, reviewing the literature, framing the interview questions, and served as a guide for data collection.
Discussion
Using a qualitative exploratory descriptive approach, we explored nurses’ perspectives and the factors influencing the quality of resuscitation practices in Ghana. Guided by Lawton’s model of quality of life [
26] and with the thematic analytic approach recommended by Braun & Clarke [
34], we found four main emergent themes: “psychological well-being of nurses”, “environmental factors affecting the quality of CPR care”, “nurses’ perception of care on resuscitation” and “self-reported behavioural competence during resuscitation” with several sub-themes.
In line with Lawton’s [
26] psychological well-being construct, our study reported that nurses’ psychological well-being was characterised by positive and negative emotions that impacted the quality of their CPR practice. Regarding the positive emotions, our study participants shared their experience of extreme delight, happiness, and a good sense of accomplishment whenever people on whom they had performed resuscitation came back to life, believing that they did not just perform the CPR, but it yielded a successful outcome. Even with some unsuccessful outcomes, the fact that they did their best gave them joy. Drotske and De-Villiers [
16] and Femandez-Aedo et al. [
39] also found positive emotional experiences among nurses following successful resuscitation. This finding is significant to nursing practice because positive emotions serve as a great motivator to nurses and tend to spur them on to do more when they come across patients whose clinical conditions warrant resuscitation. This also implies that nurse managers and clinical supervisors should capitalise on some of these positive experiences of nurses to help them develop positive attitudes toward resuscitation, even in the worst situations when they think the survival of the patient is almost impossible.
On the other hand, we found negative emotions characterised by a great sense of tragedy, regret, guilt, emotional exhaustion, and demotivation affected the quality of resuscitation. Similar findings were reported by Drotske and De-Villiers [
16], Femandez-Aedo et al. [
39], and Koželj, Strauss, and Strnad [
40], revealing altered psychological health following a failed resuscitation among nurses. The similarity in the findings can be explained from the perspective that poor resuscitation outcomes put nurses at risk of post-resuscitation stress, which when coupled with ineffective coping strategies, further compounds nurses’ negative experiences. This negative experience could greatly impact the quality of subsequent resuscitation practices. This study finding implies that nurses deserve effective coping strategies to build resilience against negative experiences following failed resuscitation.
Another factor that was found to influence the quality of resuscitation practice among nurses in Ghana is related to the clinical environment. We revealed that environmental factors such as the time of initiating CPR after a patient reports cardiac arrest, the availability and appropriateness of equipment and medications, workplace ergonomics, and institutional regulations meaningfully enhance the quality of resuscitation practices of nurses. Consistent with the findings of other researchers, our study found that time is a major determinant of the outcome of any emergency medical intervention, including resuscitation [
17‐
19]. Addressing the factors that impact the time of initiating CPR is important, given that the most favourable benefits of CPR are achieved in the first 15 min of initiating CPR. This finding signifies that nurses working in emergency departments will have to be on the alert through continuous assessment and monitoring of critically ill patients to detect those with high risks of cardiac arrest and those whose cardiac arrests may not be preceded by any warning sign. Even when understaffed, nurses would still have to play their role of being critical in detecting patients whose clinical conditions require resuscitation and intervening for them as soon as identified.
Still, on environmental factors, we found the availability of equipment such as beds, stretchers, various CPR devices, and medications to have impacted the CPR practices of nurses, resulting in poor patient outcomes. Similarly, a Botswanan study by Tsima et al. [
21] reported that equipment and medication inadequacy negatively impact CPR. Afaya et al. [
20] also identified inadequate equipment as one of the challenges in the emergency room. Notably, the availability of appropriate and functioning equipment for CPR is a major determinant of the outcome of any resuscitation. Although some nurses can utilise advanced skills during resuscitation, with or without using some special equipment, this does not apply universally in all situations. Some cardiac arrests may require interventions beyond resuscitation, and this is where the use of some equipment comes in. The unavailability of this equipment disrupts the resuscitation process and predisposes the patient to death. These situations are most evidenced in resource-deprived facilities, where access to such equipment and drugs is a major challenge. This implies that nurses at the forefront of resuscitation should not relent in pushing for hospital management to provide them with the required equipment and medications for resuscitation. Sometimes, these equipment and medications for resuscitation are available but disorganised, which makes access to them difficult. This implies that nurses should organise their resuscitation items to have easy and fast access to them when resuscitation arises.
Our study further found that workplace ergonomics was compromised as an environmental factor influencing the quality of CPR. This challenge occurred because nurses could not access the best available beds and safety conditions during CPR. Despite these limitations, the desire to get the patients back to life caused most nurses to neglect to adhere to safety protocols during resuscitation by resorting to inappropriate body mechanics and postures. This finding agrees with Goodarzi et al. [
41] and Citolino-Filho et al. [
42]. Arguably, Perkins et al. [
43] challenged that regardless of the bed/mattress used during resuscitation, outcomes for resuscitation are better when done on the floor than on beds/mattresses. This study finding presents some implications for the practice of nursing. Poor workplace ergonomics negatively affect the overall health and well-being of nurses working in the emergency department. The emergency unit is already known to be stressful, taking into account the number of events that go on there and the fact that cases come in without any predetermination, yet immediate quality care is expected. This state of uncertainty, coupled with poor workplace ergonomics, puts nurses at a great predisposition for burnout. Burnout may be characterised by emotional exhaustion and low job satisfaction, which affect commitment levels [
44,
45].
Furthermore, institutional regulations and policies were one of the environmental factors that influenced the quality of resuscitation practices of nurses in Ghana. Participants perceived that some national and institutional regulations restricted them from performing certain care activities, including resuscitation. Although empirical evidence backing this finding is inadequate, a study found that institutional cultures and policies influence physician trainees’ attitudes toward autonomy in implementing a do-not-resuscitate order [
46]. Our study findings can be explained from the perspective that participants were nurses among whom there were no specialists in emergency care. As such, the nurses are bound to experience institutional limitations regarding how much they can render CPR services to patients. Nonetheless, focusing on some institutional regulations might inadvertently undermine patients’ health, depriving those needing emergency resuscitation care. This implies that hospitals will have to invest in training more specialist nurses to render care that they otherwise would not have performed if they were not specialists.
Furthermore, our study participants perceived that nurses had attitudes of condemnation, prejudice, and apathy toward resuscitation. Study participants recounted how their colleague nurses condemned patients brought in with cardiac arrests. These negative perceptions cause most nurses to withhold care for such patients with the mindset that their efforts may not yield significant results. Although evidence on this finding is inadequate, a cursory review of the study by Mogadasian et al. [
47] revealed how Iranian nurses felt it was futile to initiate CPR to prolong the life of frail elderly and that all patients with brain impairment do not need to be resuscitated. Our study finding has some implications for nurses’ resuscitation practices. Nurses may need to develop a positive attitude toward resuscitation by avoiding the perception of condemnation and prejudice about patients. This will prevent patients who mostly require resuscitation from being misconceived by those who do not need such interventions.
As a component of nurses’ behavioural competence, our study participants acknowledged the role of adequate knowledge and skills acquisition in the quality of resuscitation. Interestingly so, varying levels of nurses’ knowledge of resuscitation have been reported by several scholars [
21,
48‐
50], implying that not all nurses have adequate knowledge and skills required for performing resuscitation. Sometimes, having adequate knowledge about resuscitation is not the single most important measure of the level of competence when it comes to resuscitation. Notably, competence may be built by the continuous practice of resuscitation. Although the beginning of practising resuscitation may be poorly done, continuous practice and observation of others will enable nurses to build competence on the job.
Also, lack of confidence in initiating CPR was found as another behavioural competence factor that influenced the quality of resuscitation practices of our study participants. This finding is in line with the study by Saevareid and Balandin [
23] Saevareid and Balandin [
23] observed that nurses were sceptical about attempting resuscitation, especially when resuscitation status was not decided for patients, they considered they should have a do-not-attempt resuscitation order. Similarly, Mäkinen et al. [
22] also found a lack of confidence in performing CPR among nurses, as evidenced by their hesitance to perform defibrillation because of fear of injuring patients. This finding implies that enough training is required to build nurses’ confidence regarding the practice of resuscitation. This recommendation is in line with some studies which found nurses’ confidence levels improved after focused in-house training [
22,
24]. Also, more research is required to test the effectiveness of training programs on the confidence and competence level of nurses in performing CPR.
Finally, our study participants acknowledged that minimal effort was put into resuscitation. Participants expressed the need for effort maximisation is not a requirement for nurses alone. Institutional efforts are also required to obtain significant outcomes as far as resuscitation care is concerned. In some cases, the efforts inputted may seem minimal, but with consistency, those minimal efforts will contribute synergistically to yield significant gains in CPR. In addition to effort maximisation from nurses and the facility level, other members of the multidisciplinary healthcare team are also expected to contribute their efforts toward ensuring that resuscitation is not left to only some cadre of healthcare providers resulting in a situation where such people’s absence will mean that resuscitation cannot be performed.
Limitations
This study utilised a purposive sampling technique in recruiting participants for the study. Although this design enabled us to recruit participants based on our discretion that they were appropriate to provide responses that met the purpose of the study, it is essential to have also noted that nurses were not the only individuals involved in resuscitation. As such, any views that nurses could have expressed regarding resuscitation could have been equally expressed by other members of the healthcare profession, such as physicians, physician assistants, anaesthetics, and midwives. Thus, this study was limited to using a purposive technique, which did not capture the view of other multidisciplinary healthcare team members. Also, using a qualitative approach limits the generalisation of findings. However, the intention of our study, like all qualitative study to provide insights into nurses’ perceptions regarding the quality of adult resuscitation practices.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.