Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2025 | Research

Medication administration errors and predictive role of resilience and emotional exhaustion in a sample of Iranian nurses

verfasst von: Mehrshad Mohebifar, Mehrnaz Ahmadi, Saba Moradi

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2025

Abstract

Background

Medication errors, mainly in the administration phase are, one of the most prevalent and critical problems in healthcare, so it is crucial to examine the factors that influence the incidence of medication administration errors among nurses. Nurses’ burnout caused by emotional exhaustion often results in frequent errors, compromising patient safety. Conversely, nurses’ resilience level has been linked to promoting professional development and enhancing the level of patient safety and care. This study aimed to ascertain whether nurse emotional exhaustion and resilience can predict medication administration errors.

Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive correlational study was conducted on 272 nurses from February 2024 to April 2024 in the teaching hospitals affiliated to Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. The data of the study was collected through the demographic information questionnaire, the medication administration errors questionnaire, the short version of the Resilience Scale (RS-14), and the emotional exhaustion scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics such as independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and multiple linear regression in SPSS-22.

Results

nurses’ mean scores for medication administration errors, emotional exhaustion, and resilience were 10.29 ± 10.02, 29.97 ± 7.92, and 56.65 ± 8.28, respectively. The regression model indicated that the rise in resilience, age, and work experiences are associated with decreased levels of medication administration errors as much as 0.42, 0.51, and 0.80 times respectively. This model explained 23% of the variance in medication administration errors in nurses (F = 18.054, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The level of resilience among nurses was found to play a very important role not only in preventing medication administration errors but also in preventing nurse emotional exhaustion. Accordingly, teaching positive coping methods when dealing with stressful situations must be given top priority in all healthcare settings to promote nurses’ standard of care, reduce the likelihood of medical errors, and prevent emotional exhaustion. Additionally, nurses must receive continuous, dedicated training on drug knowledge, including side effects, as well as the correct techniques of drug administration.
Hinweise

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Medication errors are one type of medical error, and maintaining patient safety and preventing the harm caused by this type of error is one of the important aspects of nursing care [1]. This is because the implementation of medication orders is an important part of the treatment and care process of the patient, which is the main part of nurses’ practice [2]. As one of the most common and significant problems in health systems, medication errors can be considered a threat to patients’ health [3]. Medication errors have a detrimental effect on healthcare systems around the globe. For example, worldwide, errors related to medication are responsible for 5–41.3% of all hospital admissions and contribute to 22% of readmissions following discharge [4]. In England, 237 million medication errors happen each year at various stages of the medication process [5]. One in every five Americans has encountered a medication error during their healthcare treatment [6]. Moreover, studies have shown that 10% of the causes of patients’ death are related to medication errors [7, 8]. In the U.S., approximately 7,000 to 9,000 individuals lose their lives annually as a result of medication errors [9]. In Iranian hospitals, medication error rate was estimated at 10.9% and the average occurrence of medication administration errors within three months for each nurse is 19.5 cases [10]. Among Iranian nurses, the 6 most commonly reported errors include: wrong time of drug administration, wrong injection method, giving the wrong drug, error in drug calculations, and neglecting drug interactions [8, 11]. A recent systematic review reveals that 54% of nurses in Iran have encountered medication administration errors. The most frequently reported types of errors among nurses were incorrect timing (27.3%) and incorrect dosage (26.4%) [12]. Medication errors lead to adverse consequences such as increased length of hospital stay and treatment costs, loss of patient trust, patient dissatisfaction with health service provider systems, and nurses’ stress and moral conflicts [13, 14]. Studies have shown that several factors can increase the incidence of medication errors in nurses. Some of these factors such interruptions/distractions [12], shortage of time, lack of equipment, lack of personnel on the one hand [3, 7, 8, 11] and increased workload and the consequent physical fatigue, as well as frequent job stress and tension on the other hand, are regarded as hidden factors affecting medication errors in previous studies [1517]. These factors have led to emotional exhaustion and job burnout in nurses, which is associated with a decline in the quality of nursing services and increased likelihood of patient harm [16].
Job burnout is one of the predicaments that have plagued healthcare organizations today [16]. In clinical settings, job burnout means loss of feeling towards and interest in the client, leading to provision of inappropriate and inhumane care for them [18]. Maslach described burnout syndrome as a state of emotional exhaustion stemming from stress related to interactions with others [19]. Emotional exhaustion is a long-lasting physical and emotional fatigue caused by overwhelming work and/or personal pressures and ongoing stress. Responses to burnout can involve emotional reactions, including feelings of emotional exhaustion [20]. Nurses can easily experience burnout and, as a result, emotional exhaustion due to the highly stressful nature of their job [21]. The global prevalence of job burnout among nurses is 11.23% [16]. In Iran, the prevalence of burnout among Iranian nurses has been reported between 25 and 89%, which indicates moderate to high burnout rate in nurses [22]. Job burnout and emotional exhaustion in nurses are associated with symptoms such as failure to show up on time for work shifts, lack of commitment to work, anxiety or depression, and changing or replacing jobs [18, 21, 22]. These factors have diminished the quality of providing care to patients [15, 16, 22, 23], which is a threat to patient safety and increases the incidence of medication errors [17, 23].
Recent research has indicated a connection between resilience and emotional exhaustion, suggesting that resilience may help protect individuals from experiencing emotional exhaustion [21]. Resilience is one of the most important abilities of human beings that can help them effectively adapt to stressors in difficult conditions and mental pressures. Resilience is a factor that helps people to face and adapt to difficult and stressful life conditions and protects them from mental disorders and life problems [24]. In fact, resilience allows a person to overcome environmental stress in difficult situations by adapting to the situation and having a positive outlook. This feature helps the individual to avoid early burnout and emotional exhaustion caused by the difficulty of work [25, 26]. Studies have shown that increased resilience reduces work stress, improves nurses’ quality of work life, and enhances their job satisfaction [27, 28]. Also, improving the level of resilience in nurses has been associated with fostering professional growth, better patient management at the bedside [29], and reduced burnout and emotional exhaustion [21, 25]. This will not only improve the quality of nursing care, and thus the services provided, but also enhance the level of patient safety and care [26, 29]. Therefore, resilience can be regarded as one of the effective factors in reducing the amount of medication errors.
Identification of the factors contributing to medication errors can potentially provide useful and valuable information for healthcare policymakers in designing and implementing effective interventions aimed at reducing medication errors and improving patient safety. However, limited studies have been conducted on the association of factors such as emotional exhaustion and resilience with medication errors. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the rate of medication errors, emotional exhaustion, and resilience in a sample of Iranian nurses. This study also assessed whether resilience and emotional exhaustion could predict medication administration errors among nurses.

Methods

Hypotheses

There are two hypotheses in the study:
(1)
The level of resilience of nurses is the predictor of their medication administration errors.
 
(2)
The level of emotional exhaustion of nurses is a predictor of their medication administration errors.
 

Design and sample

This cross-sectional, descriptive correlational study was conducted from February 2024 to April 2024 at three teaching hospitals affiliated with Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz, Iran. The hospitals of Golestan and Emam Khomeini, provide services in internal medicine, surgery, pediatrics, intensive care unit (ICU), coronary care unit (CCU), neurosurgery, urology, psychiatry, neurology, cardiology, nephrology, infectious diseases, orthopedics, gynecology, and emergency departments. Shahid Baghai Hospital specializes in adult and pediatric oncology, hematology, thalassemia, emergency, and ICU departments.
The inclusion criteria consisted of having at least one year of work experience as a member of the nursing staff at a teaching hospital. Nurses who were hesitant to participate in the study, those who did not complete the questionnaires, internships, and nurses who had not undergone the orientation program were excluded. In order to adhere to ethical standards in the study, all participants first filled out a written consent form to take part in the research.
The sample size was established concerning the population size (908 people). Using Cochran’s statistical formula, the number of samples was estimated at 270 nurses (95% confidence interval and 80% power). Three hundred and forty nurses were invited to participate in the study. Forty-eight people declined to participate in the study, and twenty incomplete questionnaires were returned. Therefore, the study included 272 nurses who willingly participated by providing their consent. The response rate was 80%.

Measurements

Data were collected through a demographic information questionnaire and three self-reported scales.

Demographic information questionnaire

The questionnaire includes questions about the participants’ gender, age, marital status, parental status, education level, and specific details about their department (medical/surgical wards, intensive care unit/emergency room, or other), as well as their employment status, work experience, shift schedule, weekly work hours, and level of interest in the nursing field.

Medication administration error questionnaire

The medication administration error questionnaire was developed by Jolaee et al. (2009) in Iran [30] and has been used in various Iranian studies [3133]. It is made up of 16 items about the incidence of medication administration errors over the past six months. Each item answered on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very much). The range of possible scores was 0–64, which a higher score indicates more medication administration errors in nurses. The score of the scale is categorized into three levels: low-medication administration errors (0–20.99), moderate-medication administration errors (21–41.99), and high-medication administration errors (42–64). The questionnaire’s reliability and validity were evaluated by Jolaee et al. [30]. Their study found a reliability of 0.80 using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. In the current study, the internal consistency of the medication administration errors questionnaire was assessed and verified with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.92.

Short version of Resilience Scale (RS-14)

The RS-14 was used to assess nurses’ resilience. The RS-14 developed by Wagnild (2009) consists of 14 items and three subscales: self-management (5 items), The meaning of life (5 items), and self-confidence (4 items). The responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 5 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree). The values ​​in the scale range from 14 to 70, with higher values, ​​indicating greater resilience [34]. The score of the scale is categorized into three levels: low resilience (14–32.99), moderate resilience (33–51.99), and high resilience (52–70). A Persian version of the RS-14 has been validated in Iran [35]. The reliability of the scale was calculated at 0.90 using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient in the present study.

Emotional exhaustion scale

The emotional exhaustion scale consists of 9 items that assess feelings of being emotionally drained and exhausted by work. Participants rate their responses on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (every day). The scoring range is 0–54; a higher score indicates more severe emotional exhaustion. Scores falling within 0–16, 17–26, and 27 and above are categorized as low, moderate, and high levels of emotional exhaustion, respectively [36]. A Persian version of this scale has been validated in Iran [37]. The reliability of this scale was calculated at 0.87 using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient in the present study.

Statistical analysis

The data was analyzed using SPSS version 22 software. Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation and frequency and percentage) were used to analyze the data. The study employed independent t-tests and one-way ANOVA to compare the mean scores of medication administration errors, resilience, and emotional exhaustion based on different demographic variables. Significant demographic variables, along with resilience and emotional exhaustion, were considered as independent variables in the regression model. The relationships between the outcome variables (medication administration errors, resilience, and emotional exhaustion) were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficients in correlation matrices before conducting the regression analysis. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of nurse medication administration errors. The level of statistical significance was declared at p-value < 0.05.

Results

A total of 272 nurses were included in the study. The mean age of the nurses was 33.72 ± 7.62 years. Most of them (78.3%) were female, 56.3% were married, 90.1% had a bachelor’s degree, 81.6% worked rotating shifts, and 62.8% worked more than 40 h a week. Other characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Demographic variables of nursing staff based on three outcome variables; medication administration errors, resilience, and emotional exhaustion (n = 272)
Variables
Number (%)
Resilience
(M ± SD)
Medication administration Error
(M ± SD)
Emotional Exhaustion (M ± SD)
Age
≤ 32
138 (50.7)
55.91 ± 8.83
11.72 ± 10.32
30.80 ± 7.93
> 33
134(49.2)
57.41 ± 7.64
8.87 ± 9.55
29.11 ± 7.85
p-value
0.13
0.01
0.07
Sex
Female
213 (78.3)
56.15 ± 8.33
9.91 ± 9.28
30.32 ± 7.62
Male
59 (21.6)
58.45 ± 7.92
11.76 ± 12.35
28.71 ± 8.86
p-value
0.05
0.28
0.16
Education level
Bachelor Degree
245 (90.1)
56.65 ± 8.29
10.19 ± 9.84
29.93 ± 7.80
Master Degree
27 (9.9)
56.62 ± 8.33
11.44 ± 11.74
30.33 ± 9.07
p-value
0.98
0.54
0.80
Marital status
Single
114(41.9)
56.64 ± 8.56
10.53 ± 10.31
30.35 ± 7.89
Married
153(56.3)
56.62 ± 8.19
10.17 ± 9.98
29.70 ± 8.04
Divorced
5(1.8)
57.60 ± 5.59
9.80 ± 4.86
29.60 ± 5.02
p-value
0.96
0.95
0.80
Parental status
No
147(54.0)
56.65 ± 8.50
10.53 ± 9.85
30.44 ± 7.98
Yes
125(45.9)
56.64 ± 8.06
10.06 ± 10.28
29.41 ± 7.83
p-value
 
0.98
0.70
0.28
Interest in the nursing field
No
89 (32.7)
53.84 ± 8.82
12.12 ± 10.99
32.41 ± 7.78
Yes
183 (67.3)
58.01 ± 7.67
9.40 ± 9.42
28.78 ± 7.73
p-value
 
< 0.001
0.03
< 0.001
Work experience in years
< 10
122 (44.8)
55.75 ± 8.61
11.69 ± 10.53
30.99 ± 7.97
10–20
133 (48.8)
57.15 ± 8.19
9.64 ± 9.75
29.32 ± 7.69
> 20
17 (6.2)
59.17 ± 5.67
5.76 ± 6.36
27.76 ± 8.75
p-value
0.17
0.04
0.12
Employment status
Permanent
182 (66.9)
56.65 ± 8.21
10.29 ± 10.37
29.46 ± 7.81
Temporary
38 (13.9)
58.92 ± 7.82
9.18 ± 7.78
28.63 ± 8.71
Obligatory service contact
52 (19.1)
54.98 ± 8.61
11.23 ± 10.37
32.75 ± 7.18
p-value
0.08
0.63
0.01
Shift schedule
Fixed day shift
48 (17.6)
57.31 ± 5.86
8.45 ± 8.30
28.35 ± 7.20
Rotating shift
224 (81.6)
56.50 ± 8.72
10.71 ± 10.34
30.32 ± 8.04
 
p-value
0.43
0.15
0.11
Weekly work hours
> 40 h
171(62.8)
57.00 ± 8.04
9.83 ± 9.24
30.02 ± 7.71
≤ 40 h
101(37.1)
56.04 ± 8.69
11.14 ± 11.26
29.88 ± 8.29
p-value
 
0.35
0.32
0.88
Department/Unit
Medical/surgical wards
97 (35.6)
55.63 ± 7.40
10.57 ± 9.44
31.58 ± 7.26
Intensive care unit/ Emergency room
80 (29.4)
57.33 ± 8.58
9.16 ± 8.47
29.73 ± 8.26
Oncology
29 (10.6)
56.13 ± 10.79
12.53 ± 15.49
27.34 ± 7.82
Others
66 (24.2)
57.53 ± 7.91
10.39 ± 9.77
29.04 ± 8.15
p-value
0.41
0.47
0.04
Demographic characteristics of the nurses according to the mean levels of their medication administration errors, resilience, and emotional exhaustion are presented in Table 1. The table indicates that there were no significant differences between the mean scores of medication administration errors, resilience, and emotional exhaustion based on gender, marital status, parental status, education level, shift schedule, and weekly work hours of the nurses. However, a significant difference was observed in medication administration errors, resilience, and emotional exhaustion based on the level of interest in the nursing field. Nurses with a greater interest in the nursing field reported higher levels of resilience, lower emotional exhaustion, and fewer medication administration errors. Additionally, there was a significant difference in the mean medication administration error scores based on the nurses’ age and work experience. Nurses with greater age and work experience reported fewer medication administration errors. Furthermore, a significant difference was found in the mean emotional exhaustion scores based on employment status and the departments where nurses worked. Nurses in mandatory service and those who worked in oncology departments reported significantly higher levels of emotional exhaustion (Table 1).
The mean of the nurses’ medication administration errors was 10.29 ± 10.02. In total, 85.3%, 13.2%, and 1.5% of nurses had low, moderate, and high medication administration errors, respectively. The mean score of nurses’ resilience was 56.65 ± 8.28. Additionally, 7%, 23.8%, and 76.1% of nurses had weak, moderate, and high resilience, respectively. The mean score of nurses’ emotional exhaustion was 29.97 ± 7.92. Furthermore, 2.2%, 23.2%, and 74.6% of nurses had low, moderate, and high emotional exhaustion, respectively. The results showed that nurses who reported higher resilience and less emotional exhaustion reported significantly fewer medication administration errors (Table 2).
Table 2
Differences in emotional exhaustion, and resilience based on the severity of medication administration errors
 
Number (%)
Resilience
(M ± SD)
Emotional Exhaustion (M ± SD)
Medication administration errors
Low
232 (85.3)
57.53 ± 7.64
29.35 ± 7.70
Moderate
36 (13.2)
53.11 ± 8
32.75 ± 7.87
High
4 (1.4)
37.50 ± 16.01
40.75 ± 9.74
Total
272
56.65 ± 8.28
29.97 ± 7.92
p-value
< 0.001
0.001
Table 3 shows the frequency distribution of different types of medication administration errors based on questionnaire questions. The administration of several oral medicines together, the administration of painkillers after surgery without a doctor’s prescription, and the administration of medicine later or earlier than the prescribed time were the most common medication administration errors among nurses (Table 3).
Table 3
Descriptive data of different types of medication administration errors in nurses (n = 272)
 
M ± SD
Never
N (%)
Rarely
N (%)
Sometimes
N (%)
Often
N (%)
Always
N (%)
1. Rapid injection of medicine that should be injected slowly
0.88 ± 1.05
130 (47.8)
71 (26.1)
51 (18.8)
11 (4.0)
9 (3.3)
2. Injecting medicine in the wrong place
0.31 ± 0.68
210 (77.2)
44 (16.2)
13 (4.8)
3 (1.1)
2 (0.7)
3. Administration of chewable or sublingual medicine by swallowing
0.50 ± 0.80
179 (65.8)
57 (21.0)
30 (11.0)
4 (1.5)
2 (7)
4. Administration of several oral medicines together
1.43 ± 1.29
93 (34.2)
51 (18.8)
66 (24.3)
42 (15.4)
20 (7.4)
5. Administration of painkillers after surgery without a doctor’s prescription
1.00 ± 1.16
130 (47.8)
56 (20.6)
50 (18.4)
27 (9.9)
9 (3.3)
6. Administration of medicine to the patient by mistake
0.35 ± 0.73
204 (75.0)
49 (18.0)
12 (4.4)
4 (1.5)
3 (1.1)
7. Administration of medicine less or more than the prescribed dose
0.56 ± 0 0.86
172 (63.2)
59 (21.7)
32 (11.8)
6 (2.2)
3 (1.1)
8. Administration of medicine without specifying the administration route
0.34 ± 0.74
208 (76.5)
44 (16.2)
14 (5.1)
2 (0.7)
4 (1.5)
9. Failure to observe the proper condition of the patient according to the type of medicine
0.45 ± 0 0.77
185 (68.0)
56 (20.6)
26 (9.6)
3 (1.1)
2 (0.7)
10. Failure to administer the prescribed medicine to the patient
0.40 ± 0.73
195 (71.7)
50 (18.4)
23 (8.5)
2 (0.7)
2 (0.7)
11. Administration of medicine to a patient without a doctor’s prescription
0.61 ± 0.94
171 (62.9)
53 (19.5)
35 (12.9)
8 (2.9)
5 (1.8)
12. Administration of medicine later or earlier than the prescribed time
1.05 ± 1.15
115 (42.3)
73 (26.8)
51 (18.8)
20 (7.4)
13 (4.8)
13. Not diluting the medicine that needs to be diluted
0.38 ± 0.78
205 (75.4)
41 (15.1)
18 (6.6)
5 (1.8)
3 (1.1)
14. Failure to observe the appropriate time of medication (before or after meals)
0.71 ± 0.95
148 (54.4)
72 (26.5)
38 (14.0)
9 (3.3)
5 (1.8)
15. Failure to take necessary measures (such as taking blood pressure and pulse, etc.) regarding drugs that require special attention
0.59 ± 0.89
164 (60.3)
69 (25.4)
30 (11.0)
3 (1.1)
6 (2.2)
16. Mixing two or more drugs in a microset regardless of drug interactions
0.65 ± 1.00
167 (61.4)
58 (21.3)
29 (10.7)
10 (3.7)
8 (2.9)

Regression analyses results

A correlation matrix was created as a prerequisite for regression analysis. A significant positive correlation was found between medication administration errors and emotional exhaustion (r = 0.25, p < 0.001). Additionally, a significant negative correlation was established between medication administration errors and resilience (r = -0.44, p < 0.001) (Table 4).
Table 4
Correlation matrix between variables of resilience, medication administration errors, and emotional exhaustion in nurses
Variables
Resilience
Medication administration errors
Emotional exhaustion
Resilience
1
-0.444**
-0.378**
Medication administration errors
-0.444**
1
0.251**
Emotional exhaustion
-0.378**
0.251**
1
According to Pearson correlation coefficients: ∗∗p < 0.001
Multiple linear regression analyses were performed using the Enter method to determine the predictors of medication administration errors in nurses (Table 5). The results revealed that resilience (β = -0.354, p < 0.001), age (β = -0.390, p = 0.013), and work experiences (β = -0.546, p = 0.001) were predictors for medication administration errors in nurses. This model explained 23% of the variance in medication administration errors in nurses, a small but meaningful explanatory value (F = 18.054, p < 0.001). Also, this model indicated that the rise in resilience, age, and work experiences are associated with decreased levels of medication administration errors as much as 0.42, 0.51, and 0.80 times respectively.
Table 5
Multiple linear regression models (enter method) with the scores of medication administration errors in nurses as dependent variable
Model
R
R2
AdjR2
F
Independent variables
B
SE
β
t
p
Medication administration errors
0.503
0.253
0.239
18.054
Constant
24.067
7.321
-
3.288
0.001
Resilience
-0.428
0.072
-0.354
-5.925
< 0.001
Emotional exhaustion
0.099
0.073
0.078
1.352
0.177
Age
-0.513
0.204
-0.390
-2.511
0.013
Interest in the nursing field
-0.358
1.207
-0.017
-0.297
0.767
Work experience
-0.801
0.228
-0.546
-3.515
0.001

Discussion

The aim of this study was to determine the rate of medication administration errors in nurses and to examine the predictors of these errors. According to the results of the present study, 85.7% of the nurses participating in the study had experienced a medication error at least once during the last 6 months. In line with the results of the present study, the results of a similar study in Iran also reported that the rate of medication administration errors among nurses during the last 6 months was over 85%, which was an average of 3.6 cases per nurse [2]. According to the results of a systematic review, the prevalence of medication administration errors in Iranian nurses over a 3–6-month period has been reported in various studies to be between 10 and 80% [8]. The results of studies in other countries also show that a large number of nurses experience medication errors during their working period, which is in line with the results of the present study [5, 9, 38, 39]. However, one of the important results in the present study was that only 14.7% of the nurses reported the incidence of errors during drug administration as moderate to high, with more than 85% reporting that their error rate was small. This result did not run counter to our expectation since the results of previous studies have also shown that many medication errors occur for various reasons, including fear and concern about the consequences of reporting them. These consequences include reduced trust of colleagues, legal issues, negative reactions from patients or their families, and the reactions of the management [7, 4042]. The results of a recent study in Saudi Arabia on 408 nurses showed that more than half of the nurses had committed medication errors while less than half had reported the errors [43]. Although in the present study we tried to reassure the nurses that their information is only used for research purposes, the bias of the nurses in reporting their error rate was evident to some extent.
In the present study, the majority of nurses reported their level of emotional exhaustion as one of the important dimensions of burnout as moderate to high and their resilience as high, which is consistent with many previous studies [2325]. In addition, the present study showed a positive and significant correlation between emotional exhaustion and medication error rate. The results of previous studies on the relationship between burnout and the incidence of medication errors have also shown that with the increase in burnout, the rate of medication errors rises significantly [17, 44, 45]. Nurses’ fatigue and emotional exhaustion, which are caused by their multiple tasks, high workload, night work, etc., are among the factors that greatly reduce the quality of care and the degree of patient safety, which naturally affects the occurrence of medication errors [23, 46, 47]. However, the linear regression results of our study showed that emotional exhaustion cannot act as a predictor of medication errors. Contrary to this result, Montgomery et al. (2021), who examined the predictive role of burnout in the occurrence of medication errors, found that all dimensions of burnout were significant predictors of medication errors [17]. Perhaps this discrepancy in results can be attributed to the difference in the variables examined in the two studies. In the present study, in addition to emotional exhaustion, resilience was also included in the regression model, and this variable was found to be the main predictor of medication administration errors in nurses. More particularly, our results showed that the amount of medication administration errors decreased 0.42 times with one unit increase in resilience. In line with the results of the present study, Pappa et al. (2023) showed that the level of resilience in nurses plays a pivotal role not only in the occurrence of clinical errors but also in dealing with errors during the daily work schedule [48]. However, it cannot be definitively stated that emotional exhaustion does not predict medication administration errors. It is possible that emotional exhaustion indirectly influences the occurrence of medication administration errors. On the other hand, in the present study, we examined only one dimension of burnout. Consequently, further research is necessary in this area.
In addition, our study demonstrated that resilience not only plays a crucial role in preventing medication administration errors but also significantly reduces emotional exhaustion. This result has been confirmed by many previous studies that have shown that nurses who use resilient behaviors and capacities in facing professional problems to maintain their health, suffer less emotional exhaustion [2527]. Resilience is one of the most important psychological aspects contributing to the professional performance of nurses, which is associated with their increased job satisfaction and improved quality of life [27]. In addition, studies have shown that the development of resilience in nurses is related to their efficient use of coping mechanisms [49]. This highlights the need to promote individual adaptation factors and to cultivate coping methods including resilience in nurses so that they can deal with the daily stress caused by the difficulties of work and show better adaptation. This naturally plays a role in reducing the emotional exhaustion of nurses, which in turn will not only lead to providing safe services to patients but also be effective in reducing medication errors [23].
In the present study, no significant difference was observed in the amount of medication administration error in terms of gender, educational attainment, marital status, work shift, having children, or working overtime. However, our results showed that nurses who were younger and had a lower work experience reported a higher error rate. The results of linear regression also showed that with increasing age and work experience, the medication administration error rate decreases 0.51 and 0.80 times respectively. In line with the results of the present study, previous studies have also shown that with increasing years of service, there will be a significant decrease in the occurrence of medication errors in nurses [2, 39, 41, 43, 50]. Obviously, as nurses become more experienced at work, their abilities are improved and they have the opportunity to become familiar with drugs and their side effects and learn more about safe drug administration techniques [35, 51].
The results of the present study showed that nurses who were more interested in their job reported lower error rate, less emotional exhaustion, and higher resilience. Having a positive attitude towards their profession and job satisfaction enhances the self-confidence and efficiency of nurses. As a result, they work with more mental comfort and less stress, which will lead to reduced emotional exhaustion and elevated resilience, resulting naturally in fewer clinical errors [52, 53].

Strengths and limitations

To the best of our knowledge, limited studies have examined the relationship between resilience and the rate of medication administration errors in nurses, and this was one of the strengths of our study. In addition, using an indigenous instrument for assessing the nurses’ medication administration errors and the diversity of the sample from multiple hospitals may be viewed as other strengths of this study. However, this study had a number of limitations. First, it had a cross-sectional design, so we were not able to investigate the causal relationships between the variables. Thus, longitudinal studies are needed to measure the variables over time. Second, the distributed questionnaires were self-reporting tools, and the participants provided their answers based on their personal thoughts, experiences, and feelings, which can create response bias. Since individuals do not usually want to report their mistakes, this leads to the participants’ failure to report the actual amount of errors. The implication for future research would therefore be to find a way of generating more reliable data on medication errors. Finally, this study could predict only 23% of medication error changes among nurses, and the investigated variables did not have the necessary adequacy. Medication errors can be attributed to various factors, with emotional exhaustion and a lack of resilience being just two of them. Therefore, future research should take into other personal, psychological, social, occupational, and clinical variables including interruptions/distractions that may influence the occurrence of medication administration errors in nurses.

Conclusion

The results of the present study showed that the majority of nurses participating in this study had experienced some degree of medication administration errors. High medication error rates were associated with low resilience, low work experience, and low interest in the nursing profession. Therefore, it is essential to conduct courses focused on resilience to enhance cognitive-emotional regulation, behavioral skills, and mindfulness practices, while also teaching positive coping strategies to help nurses manage stressful situations. Also, healthcare systems should consider reducing the nurses’ workload and improving their job security in order to foster motivation and increase interest in their profession. In addition, it is imperative that nurses receive continuous training dedicated to knowledge of drugs and their side effects, as well as the correct techniques of drug administration.

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted based on an approved research proposal by the Student Research Committee at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran (NO: 02s83). The researchers express gratitude to the staff of the “Student Research Committee” and “Research & Technology Chancellar” at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences for their financial assistance. Additionally, the researchers thank all the nurses who took part in the study.

Declarations

This study received approval from the ethics committee at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (Ethical Code: IR.AJUMS.REC.1402.585). Required authorizations were acquired from the appropriate authorities. Participants were briefed on the study’s objectives and assured of the confidentiality of their data. Before commencing the study, all participants provided informed consent.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dashti Z, Mozaffari N, Shamshiri M, Mohammadi M. Medication errors and its reporting by nurses of Intensive Care units of Ardabil in 2017. J Health Care. 2019;21(3):91–184. Dashti Z, Mozaffari N, Shamshiri M, Mohammadi M. Medication errors and its reporting by nurses of Intensive Care units of Ardabil in 2017. J Health Care. 2019;21(3):91–184.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Alrabadi N, Shawagfeh S, Haddad R, Mukattash T, Abuhammad S, Al-rabadi D, et al. Medication errors: a focus on nursing practice. J Pharm Health Serv Res. 2021;12(1):78–86.CrossRef Alrabadi N, Shawagfeh S, Haddad R, Mukattash T, Abuhammad S, Al-rabadi D, et al. Medication errors: a focus on nursing practice. J Pharm Health Serv Res. 2021;12(1):78–86.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tariq RA, Vashisht R, Sinha A, Scherbak Y. Medication Dispensing Errors and Prevention. 2024. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Tariq RA, Vashisht R, Sinha A, Scherbak Y. Medication Dispensing Errors and Prevention. 2024. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott RA, Camacho E, Jankovic D, Sculpher MJ, Faria R. Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021;30(2):96–105.PubMedCrossRef Elliott RA, Camacho E, Jankovic D, Sculpher MJ, Faria R. Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021;30(2):96–105.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilavand A, Jafarian N, Zarea K. Evaluation of medication errors in nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic and their relationship with shift work at teaching hospitals: a cross-sectional study in Iran. Front Med. 2023;10:1200686.CrossRef Gilavand A, Jafarian N, Zarea K. Evaluation of medication errors in nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic and their relationship with shift work at teaching hospitals: a cross-sectional study in Iran. Front Med. 2023;10:1200686.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaziri S, Fakouri F, Mirzaei M, Afsharian M, Azizi M, Arab-Zozani M. Prevalence of medical errors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1–1.CrossRef Vaziri S, Fakouri F, Mirzaei M, Afsharian M, Azizi M, Arab-Zozani M. Prevalence of medical errors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1–1.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zirpe KG, Seta B, Gholap S, Aurangabadi K, Gurav SK, Deshmukh AM, et al. Incidence of medication error in critical care unit of a tertiary care hospital: where do we stand? Indian J Crit care Med. 2020;24(9):799.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zirpe KG, Seta B, Gholap S, Aurangabadi K, Gurav SK, Deshmukh AM, et al. Incidence of medication error in critical care unit of a tertiary care hospital: where do we stand? Indian J Crit care Med. 2020;24(9):799.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Isfahani P, Bazi A, Alirezaei S, Samani S, Sarani M, Boulagh F, Poodineh Moghadam M, Afshari M. Medication error rates in Iranian hospitals: a meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):743.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Isfahani P, Bazi A, Alirezaei S, Samani S, Sarani M, Boulagh F, Poodineh Moghadam M, Afshari M. Medication error rates in Iranian hospitals: a meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):743.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Soori S, Rostami Z, Aghilidehkordi G. Occurrence and reporting of nurses’ medication errors in a teaching hospital in Isfahan. J Health Adm. 2019;21(74):75–86. Soori S, Rostami Z, Aghilidehkordi G. Occurrence and reporting of nurses’ medication errors in a teaching hospital in Isfahan. J Health Adm. 2019;21(74):75–86.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fathizadeh H, Mousavi SS, Gharibi Z, Rezaeipour H, Biojmajd AR. Prevalence of medication errors and its related factors in Iranian nurses: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):175.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fathizadeh H, Mousavi SS, Gharibi Z, Rezaeipour H, Biojmajd AR. Prevalence of medication errors and its related factors in Iranian nurses: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):175.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammadi F, Rustaee S, Bijani M. The factors influencing patient safety management as perceived by emergency department nurses: a qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2024;11(3):e2135.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mohammadi F, Rustaee S, Bijani M. The factors influencing patient safety management as perceived by emergency department nurses: a qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2024;11(3):e2135.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Heydarikhayat N, Ghanbarzehi N, Sabagh K. Strategies to prevent medical errors by nursing interns: a qualitative content analysis. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Heydarikhayat N, Ghanbarzehi N, Sabagh K. Strategies to prevent medical errors by nursing interns: a qualitative content analysis. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghasemi MS, Valizadeh N, Dehghan N, Shalbafan M. Workload and burnout among nurses of a Public Referral Psychiatric Hospital in Tehran, Iran: a cross-sectional study. J Iran Med Council. 2022;5(3):363–70. Ghasemi MS, Valizadeh N, Dehghan N, Shalbafan M. Workload and burnout among nurses of a Public Referral Psychiatric Hospital in Tehran, Iran: a cross-sectional study. J Iran Med Council. 2022;5(3):363–70.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Woo T, Ho R, Tang A, Tam W. Global prevalence of burnout symptoms among nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;123:9–20.PubMedCrossRef Woo T, Ho R, Tang A, Tam W. Global prevalence of burnout symptoms among nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;123:9–20.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Montgomery AP, Azuero A, Baernholdt M, Loan LA, Miltner RS, Qu H, Raju D, Patrician PA. Nurse burnout predicts self-reported medication administration errors in acute care hospitals. J Healthc Qual (JHQ). 2021;43(1):13–23.PubMedCrossRef Montgomery AP, Azuero A, Baernholdt M, Loan LA, Miltner RS, Qu H, Raju D, Patrician PA. Nurse burnout predicts self-reported medication administration errors in acute care hospitals. J Healthc Qual (JHQ). 2021;43(1):13–23.PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Maslach C, Jackson SE. Maslach Burnout Inventory. Manual. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Consulting Psychologists; 1981. Maslach C, Jackson SE. Maslach Burnout Inventory. Manual. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Consulting Psychologists; 1981.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright TA, Cropanzano R. Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83:486–93.PubMedCrossRef Wright TA, Cropanzano R. Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83:486–93.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin MJ, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kwon YJ, Shim SH, Choi BS, et al. The impact of emotional exhaustion on psychological factors in workers with secondary traumatic experiences: a multi-group path analysis. Psychiatry Invest. 2020;17(11):1064.CrossRef Jin MJ, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kwon YJ, Shim SH, Choi BS, et al. The impact of emotional exhaustion on psychological factors in workers with secondary traumatic experiences: a multi-group path analysis. Psychiatry Invest. 2020;17(11):1064.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohrabi Y, Yarmohammadi H, Pouya AB, Arefi MF, Hassanipour S, Poursadeqiyan M. Prevalence of job burnout in Iranian nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Work. 2022;73(3):937–43.PubMed Sohrabi Y, Yarmohammadi H, Pouya AB, Arefi MF, Hassanipour S, Poursadeqiyan M. Prevalence of job burnout in Iranian nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Work. 2022;73(3):937–43.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Soósová MS. Association between nurses’ burnout, hospital patient safety climate and quality of nursing care. Cent Eur J Nurs Midwifery. 2021;12(1):245.CrossRef Soósová MS. Association between nurses’ burnout, hospital patient safety climate and quality of nursing care. Cent Eur J Nurs Midwifery. 2021;12(1):245.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghasempour S, Hosseinzadeh A, Dadgari A, Ebrahimi H. Resilience and its Associated factors in clinical nurses: a cross-sectional study. Int J Health Stud. 2023;9(3):11–6. Ghasempour S, Hosseinzadeh A, Dadgari A, Ebrahimi H. Resilience and its Associated factors in clinical nurses: a cross-sectional study. Int J Health Stud. 2023;9(3):11–6.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamebozorgi MH, Karamoozian A, Bardsiri TI, Sheikhbardsiri H. Nurses burnout, resilience, and its association with socio-demographic factors during COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychiatry. 2022;12:803506.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jamebozorgi MH, Karamoozian A, Bardsiri TI, Sheikhbardsiri H. Nurses burnout, resilience, and its association with socio-demographic factors during COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychiatry. 2022;12:803506.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdulmohdi N. The relationships between nurses’ resilience, burnout, perceived organisational support and social support during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a quantitative cross‐sectional survey. Nurs Open. 2024;11(1):e2036.PubMedCrossRef Abdulmohdi N. The relationships between nurses’ resilience, burnout, perceived organisational support and social support during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a quantitative cross‐sectional survey. Nurs Open. 2024;11(1):e2036.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Anasori E, Kucukergin KG, Soliman M, Tulucu F, Altinay L. How can the subjective well-being of nurses be predicted? Understanding the mediating effect of psychological distress, psychological resilience and emotional exhaustion. J Service Theory Pract. 2022;32(6):762–80.CrossRef Anasori E, Kucukergin KG, Soliman M, Tulucu F, Altinay L. How can the subjective well-being of nurses be predicted? Understanding the mediating effect of psychological distress, psychological resilience and emotional exhaustion. J Service Theory Pract. 2022;32(6):762–80.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Shahrbabaki PM, Abolghaseminejad P, Lari LA, Zeidabadinejad S, Dehghan M. The relationship between nurses’ psychological resilience and job satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study in Iran. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):137.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shahrbabaki PM, Abolghaseminejad P, Lari LA, Zeidabadinejad S, Dehghan M. The relationship between nurses’ psychological resilience and job satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study in Iran. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):137.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Han P, Duan X, Jiang J, Zeng L, Zhang P, Zhao S. Experience in the development of nurses’ personal resilience: a meta-synthesis. Nurs Open. 2023;10(5):2780–92.PubMedCrossRef Han P, Duan X, Jiang J, Zeng L, Zhang P, Zhao S. Experience in the development of nurses’ personal resilience: a meta-synthesis. Nurs Open. 2023;10(5):2780–92.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Jolaee S, Hajibabaee F, Peyravi H, Haghani H. Nursing medication errors and its relationship with work condition in Iran University of Medical Sciences. IJMEHM. 2009;3(1):65–76. Jolaee S, Hajibabaee F, Peyravi H, Haghani H. Nursing medication errors and its relationship with work condition in Iran University of Medical Sciences. IJMEHM. 2009;3(1):65–76.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Musarezaie A, Momeni Ghale Ghasemi T, Zargham-Boroujeni A, Haj-Salhehi E. Survey of the medication errors and refusal to report medication errors from the viewpoints of nurses in hospitals affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. J Health Syst Res. 2013;9(1):76–85. Musarezaie A, Momeni Ghale Ghasemi T, Zargham-Boroujeni A, Haj-Salhehi E. Survey of the medication errors and refusal to report medication errors from the viewpoints of nurses in hospitals affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. J Health Syst Res. 2013;9(1):76–85.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rezaei FM, Farokhpour M. The rate, type and factors affecting drug errors from the perspective of nurses working in Intensive Care and Emergency Unite of Educational Hospitals of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. J Dev Strategies Med Educ. 2017;4(2):61–71. Rezaei FM, Farokhpour M. The rate, type and factors affecting drug errors from the perspective of nurses working in Intensive Care and Emergency Unite of Educational Hospitals of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. J Dev Strategies Med Educ. 2017;4(2):61–71.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Karimi FZ, Ebrahimipour H, Hooshmand E, Bayrami R, Pourshirazi M, Afiat M, Esmaily H, Vafaee Najar A. Medication errors and its contributing factors among midwives. J Midwifery Reproductive Health. 2016;4(4):748–56. Karimi FZ, Ebrahimipour H, Hooshmand E, Bayrami R, Pourshirazi M, Afiat M, Esmaily H, Vafaee Najar A. Medication errors and its contributing factors among midwives. J Midwifery Reproductive Health. 2016;4(4):748–56.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagnild G. The resilience scale user’s guide for the US English version of the resilience scale and the 14-item resilience scale (RS‐14). The Resilience Center. 2009. Wagnild G. The resilience scale user’s guide for the US English version of the resilience scale and the 14-item resilience scale (RS‐14). The Resilience Center. 2009.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashemi S, Akbari A, Abbasi-Asl R, Ardashiri Alashti R. Study of factor structure and psychometric adequacy of short version of resilience scale (RS-14). J Mod Psychol Researches. 2018;13(51):251–72. Hashemi S, Akbari A, Abbasi-Asl R, Ardashiri Alashti R. Study of factor structure and psychometric adequacy of short version of resilience scale (RS-14). J Mod Psychol Researches. 2018;13(51):251–72.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav. 1981;2(2):99–113.CrossRef Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav. 1981;2(2):99–113.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Moalemi S, Kavosi Z, Beygi N, Deghan A, Karimi A, Parvizi MM. Evaluation of the Persian version of maslach burnout inventory-human services survey among Iranian nurses: validity and reliability. Galen Med J. 2018;20(7):e995.CrossRef Moalemi S, Kavosi Z, Beygi N, Deghan A, Karimi A, Parvizi MM. Evaluation of the Persian version of maslach burnout inventory-human services survey among Iranian nurses: validity and reliability. Galen Med J. 2018;20(7):e995.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Rababa’h AM, Mardini AN, Ababneh MA, Rababa M, Hayajneh M. Medication errors in Jordan: a systematic review. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2022;12(2):106–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rababa’h AM, Mardini AN, Ababneh MA, Rababa M, Hayajneh M. Medication errors in Jordan: a systematic review. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2022;12(2):106–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Wondmieneh A, Alemu W, Tadele N, Demis A. Medication administration errors and contributing factors among nurses: a cross sectional study in tertiary hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2020;19(4):1–9. Wondmieneh A, Alemu W, Tadele N, Demis A. Medication administration errors and contributing factors among nurses: a cross sectional study in tertiary hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2020;19(4):1–9.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Mousavi F, Razavi SM, Shojaei P. Evaluation of medication errors in teaching hospitals. J Patient Saf Qual Improv. 2020;8(3):127–37. Mousavi F, Razavi SM, Shojaei P. Evaluation of medication errors in teaching hospitals. J Patient Saf Qual Improv. 2020;8(3):127–37.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Brabcová I, Hajduchová H, Tóthová V, Chloubová I, Červený M, Prokešová R, Malý J, Vlček J, Doseděl M, Malá-Ládová K, Tesař O. Reasons for medication administration errors, barriers to reporting them and the number of reported medication administration errors from the perspective of nurses: a cross-sectional survey. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;70:103642.PubMedCrossRef Brabcová I, Hajduchová H, Tóthová V, Chloubová I, Červený M, Prokešová R, Malý J, Vlček J, Doseděl M, Malá-Ládová K, Tesař O. Reasons for medication administration errors, barriers to reporting them and the number of reported medication administration errors from the perspective of nurses: a cross-sectional survey. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;70:103642.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Samadi S, Alipour F, Shahvari Z. Barriers to reporting medical errors: a qualitative study in Iran. J Patient Saf Qual Improv. 2021;9(2):65–71. Samadi S, Alipour F, Shahvari Z. Barriers to reporting medical errors: a qualitative study in Iran. J Patient Saf Qual Improv. 2021;9(2):65–71.
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Alandajani A, Khalid B, Ng YG, Banakhar M. Knowledge and attitudes regarding medication errors among nurses: a cross-sectional study in major Jeddah hospitals. Nurs Rep. 2022;12(4):1023–39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Alandajani A, Khalid B, Ng YG, Banakhar M. Knowledge and attitudes regarding medication errors among nurses: a cross-sectional study in major Jeddah hospitals. Nurs Rep. 2022;12(4):1023–39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Boutou A, Betsiou S, Pitsiou G, Bitzani M, Kioumis I. Nursing errors in ICU and their association with burnout, anxiety, insomnia and working environment: a cross-sectional study. 2021. Boutou A, Betsiou S, Pitsiou G, Bitzani M, Kioumis I. Nursing errors in ICU and their association with burnout, anxiety, insomnia and working environment: a cross-sectional study. 2021.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Im C, Song S, Kim K. The associations of psychological burnout and time factors on medication errors in rotating shift nurses in Korea: a cross sectional descriptive study. Nurs Open. 2023;10(8):5550–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Im C, Song S, Kim K. The associations of psychological burnout and time factors on medication errors in rotating shift nurses in Korea: a cross sectional descriptive study. Nurs Open. 2023;10(8):5550–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakemam E, Chegini Z, Rouhi A, Ahmadi F, Majidi S. Burnout and its relationship to self-reported quality of patient care and adverse events during COVID‐19: a cross‐sectional online survey among nurses. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2021;29(7):1974–82.CrossRef Kakemam E, Chegini Z, Rouhi A, Ahmadi F, Majidi S. Burnout and its relationship to self-reported quality of patient care and adverse events during COVID‐19: a cross‐sectional online survey among nurses. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2021;29(7):1974–82.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell T, Sprajcer M, Flenady T, Sahay A. Fatigue in nurses and medication administration errors: a scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2023;32(17–18):5445–60.PubMedCrossRef Bell T, Sprajcer M, Flenady T, Sahay A. Fatigue in nurses and medication administration errors: a scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2023;32(17–18):5445–60.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Pappa D, Koutelekos I, Evangelou E, Dousis E, Mangoulia P, Gerogianni G, Zartaloudi A, Toulia G, Kelesi M, Margari N, Ferentinou E. Investigation of nurses’ wellbeing towards errors in clinical practice—the role of Resilience. Medicina. 2023;59(10):1850.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pappa D, Koutelekos I, Evangelou E, Dousis E, Mangoulia P, Gerogianni G, Zartaloudi A, Toulia G, Kelesi M, Margari N, Ferentinou E. Investigation of nurses’ wellbeing towards errors in clinical practice—the role of Resilience. Medicina. 2023;59(10):1850.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Hezaveh Z, Mardani Hamooleh M, Seyed Fatemi N, Haghani S. The effect of resilience training on the psychological empowerment of ICU nurses. Iran J Nurs. 2020;33(123):22–34. Hezaveh Z, Mardani Hamooleh M, Seyed Fatemi N, Haghani S. The effect of resilience training on the psychological empowerment of ICU nurses. Iran J Nurs. 2020;33(123):22–34.
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Yusefi AR, Nikmanesh P, Kavosi Z, Sadeghi A. Identifying the factors affecting the incidence of medication errors of nurses in Teaching hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Manage Strategies Health Syst. 2021;6(3):213–23. Yusefi AR, Nikmanesh P, Kavosi Z, Sadeghi A. Identifying the factors affecting the incidence of medication errors of nurses in Teaching hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Manage Strategies Health Syst. 2021;6(3):213–23.
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammed T, Mahmud S, Gintamo B, Mekuria ZN, Gizaw Z. Medication administration errors and associated factors among nurses in Addis Ababa federal hospitals, Ethiopia: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2022;12(12):e066531.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mohammed T, Mahmud S, Gintamo B, Mekuria ZN, Gizaw Z. Medication administration errors and associated factors among nurses in Addis Ababa federal hospitals, Ethiopia: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2022;12(12):e066531.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang HY, Friesner D, Chu TL, Huang TL, Liao YN, Teng CI. The impact of burnout on self-efficacy, outcome expectations, career interest and nurse turnover. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(11):2555–65.PubMedCrossRef Chang HY, Friesner D, Chu TL, Huang TL, Liao YN, Teng CI. The impact of burnout on self-efficacy, outcome expectations, career interest and nurse turnover. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(11):2555–65.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Zhao C, Li F, Wang X, Xu H, Zhou M, Huang Y, Yang Y, Yu G, Zhang G. Longitudinal relationships among career adaptability, resilience, and career commitment in Chinese nursing undergraduates: testing differences in career interest between cross-lagged models. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhang J, Zhao C, Li F, Wang X, Xu H, Zhou M, Huang Y, Yang Y, Yu G, Zhang G. Longitudinal relationships among career adaptability, resilience, and career commitment in Chinese nursing undergraduates: testing differences in career interest between cross-lagged models. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Medication administration errors and predictive role of resilience and emotional exhaustion in a sample of Iranian nurses
verfasst von
Mehrshad Mohebifar
Mehrnaz Ahmadi
Saba Moradi
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2025
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2025
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02826-2