Background
Hospital-at-home (HaH) is an alternative model of care that delivers acute and intensive medical care requirements in a community setting, namely an individual’s home [
1‐
3]. Bolstered by the exploration and refinement of remote care models during the Covid-19 pandemic, admission, monitoring, intervention, and discharge procedures within HaH services have evolved and gained validation [
1,
4‐
7]. Extensive examination of the safety and effectiveness of the HaH care model has been conducted, drawing upon empirical quantitative data [
3,
8‐
11]. Beyond the changing landscape of institutions and hospitals and technology advancements [
12‐
16], it remains imperative to address the challenges and evaluate patient experiences in order to enhance the quality of HaH care delivery [
17,
18].
The HaH literature consistently underscores the necessity of cultivating active patient engagement in decision-making, optimizing resource utilization, and prioritizing person-centred care in delivering hospital-level services within a home environment [
19‐
26]. Within the United Kingdom, these foundational elements have been integrated into HaH services, aligning with the framework of the Integrated Care System within the National Health System (NHS) [
27]. Additionally, well-considered set of 10 principles, designed to foster collaboration with individuals and communities, has adeptly guided the path of clinical practice within HaH services [
28]. Within this comprehensive framework, HaH services integrate with other critical components such as intermediate care and community care [
29,
30], thereby amplifying patients’ experiences and understanding. The weight accorded to these experiences is of importance, as they are shaped through active participation and influenced by the family involvement and interactions with healthcare professionals [
31].
Despite this, there is a gap in the literature on how patients and caregivers perceive and engage with HaH services in the wake of the pandemic’s aftermath [
18], even though there was wide adoption of the HaH care model for healthcare delivery during the Covid-19 pandemic [
16]. This study aims to build upon insights extracted from a previous scoping review [
32] by specifically examining the integrated HaH service within the NHS system through the users’ perspective. The primary objective is to explore the experiences and perceptions of older adults who have received HaH services, with the goal of informing future quality improvement initiatives.
Methods
Study design
This study employed a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews. This design supported participant-centered interaction, enabling the researcher to explore the nuanced ways in which older adults perceive and interpret their experiences with HaH services. It also provided the flexibility to probe deeper into participants’ responses, ensuring a thorough understanding of the study’s objectives [
33]. Findings were reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines.
Study setting
The investigation focused on individuals served by Guys and St Thomas’ @home service, an acute community service to serve the residents of Lambeth and Southwark in London, UK. The primary goal is to prevent hospital admissions and facilitate early discharges from acute hospital settings [
29,
30]. This is achieved through a multidisciplinary approach and supported by integrated teamwork. Typically, patients receive visits for a period of seven days or less and may require up to three visits in a single day, which operates year-round, from 8 am to 11 pm, managing up to 3000 patient contacts per month.
Participants and recruitment
One trained investigator facilitated the recruitment of participants. Using purposive sampling, participants were identified by the HaH team in May 2023 who had recently received care through the service, had completed care, and expressed a willingness to share their experiences.
Data collection
Participant interviews were conducted by experienced qualitative researchers over an online platform (Microsoft Teams) while HaH nurses visited the patients’ homes and provided the iPad for interviews to take place. This approach was chosen to provide a familiar environment for the participants, encouraging them to openly share their experiences, and also facilitating the participation of close family caregivers as appropriate. A predetermined set of questions guided the interviews, focusing on: [1] lived experiences within the HaH service; [2] satisfaction of HaH service; [3] perceived education and training; [4] family involvement.
The interviews were conducted by two researchers (GL and XW), both of whom have expertise in HaH-related research and were deeply familiar with the healthcare system being observed. With participants’ consent for video recording, one researcher (GL) led the interviews, while the other (XW) made complementary observations and took textual notes. Special attention was given to observing patients interacting with their family caregivers and their movements within the home, which provided valuable context for better understanding their verbal expressions. This combined approach of direct observation and interaction aligns with the empiricist focus on gathering knowledge through sensory experience. Moreover, it enhances objectivity by minimizing researcher bias during data collection, ensuring the acquisition of in-depth qualitative data [
34]. The structured yet flexible design of the interviews allowed for probing questions and adaptive responses, facilitating the collection of rich, comprehensive data necessary to capture the complex and multifaceted experiences of patients within the HaH service [
35]. After each interview, the two researchers conducted thorough discussions to review the interview and observational data, ensuring completeness and addressing any ambiguities.
Data analysis
The IPA method was employed as a structured approach to delve into how individuals construct meaning within their personal and social spheres, facilitating a profound comprehension of their perceptions and interpretations [
35,
36]. In accordance with recommendations from earlier studies [
35,
37], the research included a smaller sample size, aligning with the suggested range of 4 to 10 participants. A total of 35 patients were approached for invitations, with data saturation achieved after interviewing 7 participants. All participants were designated with pseudonyms to ensure confidentiality.
Guided by the IPA framework, researcher XW transcribed the interviews verbatim and conducted an initial review of the collected data within 24 h post-interview. Each transcript was read multiple times to promote deep immersion in the material. Using Excel software, data related to patients’ previous history of acceptance or decline of HaH care, lived experiences of patients and caregivers, satisfaction with HaH services, family involvement, and perceived burdens were segmented into coherent units. Significant statements reflecting participants’ perceptions and interpretations were annotated with relevant comments. Each interview transcript, reflecting potential divergences in HaH service practices and unique participant perceptions, was analyzed individually. The transcripts were tabulated and coded to capture descriptive, linguistic, and conceptual elements of the data. An inclusive and iterative process was employed, utilizing thematic analysis to identify overarching themes. Segments and notes from each transcript were synthesized into cohesive themes, which were then compared across all participants to identify recurring patterns and variations. This comparative analysis facilitated a nuanced understanding of the participants’ experiences and highlighted the complexities inherent in their narratives. Findings for each subtheme and theme were contextualized within the broader philosophical framework of participants’ experiences and feedback on HaH services, ensuring the analysis reflected both individual and collective interpretations.
Both researchers engaged in comprehensive discussions to illuminate the contextual and cultural factors reflected in the interview transcripts. For instance, they interpreted participants’ experiences with HaH services in relation to cultural elements sensitive to participants’ backgrounds, including educational attainment, the role of family caregivers in healthcare, expectations regarding health outcomes, notions of familial duty, and beliefs about home-based versus institutional care. These factors were recognized as influential in shaping perceptions of autonomy, caregiving roles, and the quality of healthcare services experienced by participants. Notably, the two researchers possessed different cultural backgrounds and research experiences, which enriched the analysis. They maintained a reflexive stance, documenting their assumptions and personal experiences related to HaH services to enhance objectivity. Any ambiguities arising from differing practices within the HaH service prompted them to consult with another researcher who managed the service for clarification. This self-awareness and collaborative approach enabled them to analyze the data more objectively, minimizing the risk of imposing their cultural biases on participants’ narratives.
Underpinning a HaH-specific care experience conceptual framework developed in a previous study [
32], an initial inventory of themes emerged during the preliminary phase of this analysis through inductive examination of interconnected themes. These themes were systematically organized into categories, incorporating both higher-level overarching concepts and more nuanced subordinate subcategories. This structured approach ensured a comprehensive analysis that accurately captured the complex experiences of participants within the HaH service.
Rigours
The study adopted a rigorous approach, drawing from IPA’s conception of the double hermeneutic. To enhance the credibility and robustness of the findings, the study employed five expressions of rigor proposed by Witt: balanced integration, openness, concreteness, resonance, and actualization [
38]. This methodological choice emphasized an engaged collaboration between participants and researchers to jointly interpret the HaH service significance.
The interviewer team consisted of two researchers, both experienced in qualitative research. They engaged in methodological learning and real-world practice to prepare for the study. Throughout the interview process, the team maintained a balanced integration of both participants’ lived experiences and the researchers’ knowledge of the HaH care model. The philosophical framework was alternated and balanced with the voices of the study participants during the analytical process. For example, participants’ beliefs about gratitude and the meanings of family were interpreted in relation to their perceptions of family-centered care within the HaH service. In terms of openness, the semi-structured interview design facilitated the use of open-ended questions, allowing participants to share their perspectives freely. Researchers refrained from imposing judgments on participants’ expressions, focusing instead on active listening and clarification. This approach ensured that multiple viewpoints and feelings were documented as informative details. Conducting interviews in participants’ homes provided an intimate and contextual understanding of their experiences.
To achieve concreteness, the researchers immersed themselves in the observed health system and area to gain a deeper understanding of the physical environment of the HaH care service. This hands-on involvement fostered profound engagement with the real-world dynamics of the HaH service, aiding in the interpretation of participants’ expressions and aligning findings with actual HaH practices. Furthermore, the resonance of the research was enhanced by encouraging participants to articulate their perceptions and experiences in their own words. The analysis was inclusive, aiming to produce cohesive findings that accurately reflected participants’ lived experiences. Actualization was achieved by consulting with the HaH care team and the interviewed participants, connecting the themes derived from the analysis back to the broader context of healthcare practice. This aimed to inform improvements in HaH services based on insights gathered from patients’ experiences.
Discussion
Prior to discussing the main findings, it is worth noting that patients preferred HaH to being admitted to hospital. This supports a growing acceptance of the HaH concept, particularly when contrasted with results from studies predominantly conducted before Covid-19 [
39‐
41]. Nevertheless, it’s imperative to acknowledge the prevailing constraints that call for continuous refinement and enhancement of the HaH service.
In general, there exists a clear necessity to enhance the introduction of the HaH service to ensure comprehensive awareness among both patients and caregivers. This includes not only outlining the function and role of the HaH service but also involves providing guidance on effectively managing illnesses and defining individual roles, work, and responsibilities within the service framework [
42]. Within this study, it was the first-time HaH users who had a limited understanding of its functionalities. Conversely, patients who have previously used HaH were more likely to understand the service and this allowed them opportunities to develop personalized strategies to integrate and optimize the benefits [
19,
43,
44]. Similar to findings from other studies [
19,
20,
45‐
47], aspects such as the comfort and convenience of home environments, the competency of healthcare professionals, the frequency of home visits, and the appropriateness of service content are integral in ensuring safety and effectiveness. Additionally, the enhanced sleep quality and improved appetite observed among HaH patients underscore the service’s inherent benefits, in line with earlier findings [
48]. These elements hold considerable significance in shaping users’ perceptions and contribute to creating positive experiences and meaningful interactions with the HaH service.
Furthermore, a strong emphasis on advancing family-centred care was noted extending the patient-centred approach inherently ingrained in community-based home care [
49], and also to the HaH care model. The presence of family caregivers and the provision of both physical and emotional support all contribute as facilitators to patients’ recovery [
50,
51]. This study showcased that the family’s stance significantly influences patients’ choices concerning the adoption of HaH care, profoundly shaping their perceptions of the home care’s quality. Riffina advocated the collaborating, dividing, focusing approaches to effectively involve family caregivers in primary care [
52]. This demonstrates a recognition of patients’ preferences and their requirements in selecting care settings, and is one endorsed by caregivers, and plays a vital role in shared decision-making [
49], especially for older patients who often have lower health literacy and cognitive capacity [
42]. The study also affirmed that the augmentation of family-centred care is closely linked to reduced levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, whilst concurrently fostering satisfaction and good rapport with healthcare providers [
53]. These positive outcomes stemming from family involvement are not only feasible but also beneficial for the sustained success of HaH care [
54]. Moreover, family-centred approaches establish mutually beneficial partnerships among healthcare providers, patients, and families in healthcare planning, delivery, and evaluation.
The study’s findings shed light on the challenges faced by patients and their caregivers, illuminating their expectations and recommendations concerning the service. The HaH care model is anticipated to equip users with a range of resources, including equipment, written instructions, a streamlined care plan, integrated community care resources, sustained continuity of care spanning both hospital and home environments, and training regimens tailored for both patients and caregivers [
55,
56]. However, certain gaps persist, as outlined by patients’ perceptions and assessments. Mirroring the sentiments expressed by patients, the healthcare team demonstrated a prevailing sense of business, operating under a rotating schedule, underscoring the recurring themes of suboptimal communication, the heavy workloads, and the intricate challenges intrinsic to HaH practice [
15,
57]. Consequently, this interplay prompted an interactive process revolving around the reception of care at home, motivating them to propose enhancements like a personalized health record, familiarity with the healthcare team (i.e. the same healthcare professional for each visit giving continuity of care), designated visiting hours, and targeted education regarding their specific illnesses. Some of these issues were categorized as systemic or institutional constraints, as echoed in other studies [
19,
20,
23]. Over time, with the ongoing advancement of remote monitoring technology, telemedicine support, and adaptive case management, there is a hopeful prospect for enhancing the overall patient experience and outcomes [
14,
58].
The study findings could potentially be limited by the sample size and the distinct contexts within which the HaH practice takes place. There’s an anticipation for the expansion of coverage concerning various acute care needs and a broader diversity of patient characteristics. Additionally, the experiences drawn from a specific health system and pre-established healthcare services, tied to the study, might limit the generalizability of the results, even though the study’s design remains aligned with the universally recognized essence of the HaH care model. However, by blending a robust theoretical foundation with immersive hands-on engagement, the study ensured a comprehensive and thorough exploration of the inherent experiential significance within the HaH service in the post-Covid era.
Implication for future research and practice
This study captured valuable lived experiences and perspectives of patients and caregivers within the HaH service, offering crucial insights for its future development, improvement, implementation, and potential scaling across the globe. Aligned with the proposed research agenda from the World Hospital at Home Congress [
18], the themes identified advocate for the creation of a HaH-specific conceptual framework and the development of an assessment tool to evaluate care experiences. These findings also contribute to broader contextual studies, extending across diverse cultural, socioeconomic, and geographic contexts, beyond the well-established HaH models in countries such as the United Kingdom, the United States, and Australia. The positive patient evaluations, which highlight the effectiveness of the HaH care model, suggest that its structure, components, and capabilities could be adapted and enhanced in regions seeking to implement similar programs. These insights could inform operational strategies for HaH services in countries launching new initiatives.
From a practical perspective, future research should focus on designing and implementing tailored interventions to improve the quality of HaH services based on participants’ specific needs and preferences. These interventions might include additional support mechanisms for family caregivers and relevant training programs to enhance overall care quality. Moreover, such findings can inform policymakers about the significance of integrating family-centered approaches within HaH service models, ensuring that care delivery better aligns with the lived experiences and expectations of patients and caregivers.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.