Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
Zeitschriften Fortbildung Hebammen Bücher Kongresse & Live-Webinare
Social Media - Folgen Sie uns!
Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Hebammen
Service
Jobbörse Kundenservice Info & Hilfe
Fokus-Themen
Chronisch-entzündliche Darmerkrankung COVID-19-Update Diabetes Hautpflege Klima & Gesundheit Hygiene Intensivpflege Kardiologische Pflege Mobilisation Nachhaltigkeit Nierenerkrankungen Obstipation Onkologische Pflege Palliativpflege Schmerz Sucht in der Pflege Vielfalt, Gleichberechtigung und Inklusion Wundversorgung
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin
Erschienen in:

01.02.2006 | Schwerpunkt: ERC-Leitlinien

Ethik der Reanimation und Entscheidungen am Lebensende

Abschnitt 8 der Leitlinien zur Reanimation 2005 des European Resuscitation Council

verfasst von: P. J. F. Baskett, P. A. Steen, L. Bossaert, Dr. J. Bahr

Erschienen in: Notfall + Rettungsmedizin | Ausgabe 1/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Auszug

Erfolgreiche Wiederbelebungsversuche bringen vielen Menschen eine nützliche und wertvolle Verlängerung des Lebens und damit ihren Angehörigen und Nahestehenden Glück und Erleichterung. Jedoch verlängern Reanimationsversuche gelegentlich nur das Leiden und den Sterbeprozess. Und in wenigen Fällen führt die Reanimation zur ultimativen Tragödie — der Patient im persistierenden vegetativen Zustand. Reanimationsversuche bleiben in 70–95% der Fälle erfolglos und der Tod erweist sich als unabwendbar. Alle wünschen für sich einen würdevollen Tod. …
Vorheriger Artikel Kreislaufstillstand unter besonderen Umständen
Nächster Artikel Prinzipien des Trainings in der Wiederbelebung
Literatur
1.
Baskett PJ, Lim A (2004) The varying ethical attitudes towards resuscitation in Europe. Resuscitation 62: 267–273PubMed
2.
Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P et al. (2003) End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA 290: 790–797PubMed
3.
Richter J, Eisemann MR, Bauer B, Kreibeck H, Astrom S (2002) Decision-making in the treatment of elderly people: a cross-cultural comparison between Swedish and German physicians and nurses. Scand J Caring Sci 16: 149–156PubMed
4.
da Costa DE, Ghazal H, Al Khusaiby S (2002) Do Not Resuscitate orders and ethical decisions in a neonatal intensive care unit in a Muslim community. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 86: 115–119
5.
Ho NK (2001) Decision-making: initiation and withdrawing life support in the asphyxiated infants in developing countries. Singapore Med J 42: 402–405PubMed
6.
Richter J, Eisemann M, Zgonnikova E (2001) Doctors‘ authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany. J Med Ethics 27: 186–191PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Cuttini M, Nadai M, Kaminski M et al. (2000) End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians‘ self-reported practices in seven European countries. EURONIC Study Group. Lancet 355: 2112–2118PubMed
8.
Konishi E (1998) Nurses‘ attitudes towards developing a do not resuscitate policy in Japan. Nurs Ethics 5: 218–227PubMed
9.
Muller JH, Desmond B (1992) Ethical dilemmas in a cross-cultural context. A Chinese example. West J Med 157: 323–327PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Edgren E (1992) The ethics of resuscitation; differences between Europe and the USA--Europe should not adopt American guidelines without debate. Resuscitation 23: 85–89PubMed
11.
Beauchamp TL, Childress J (eds) (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
12.
Declaration of Helsinki (1964) Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects adopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964 and amended at the 29th, 35th, 41st, 48th, and 52nd WMA Assemblies. Geneva, 1964
13.
Aasland OG, Forde R, Steen PA (2003) Medical end-of-life decisions in Norway. Resuscitation 57: 312–313
14.
Danciu SC, Klein L, Hosseini MM, Ibrahim L, Coyle BW, Kehoe RF (2004) A predictive model for survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation 62: 35–42PubMed
15.
Dautzenberg PL, Broekman TC, Hooyer C, Schonwetter RS, Duursma SA (1993) Review: patient-related predictors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation of hospitalized patients. Age Ageing 22: 464–475PubMed
16.
Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ, Niemann JT (2004) Prediction rules for estimating neurologic outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 63: 145–155PubMed
17.
Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Young M, Angquist KA, Holmberg S (2004) Can we define patients with no chance of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Heart 90: 1114–1118PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Angquist KA, Young M, Holmberg S (2005) Factors associated with an increased chance of survival among patients suffering from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a national perspective in Sweden. Am Heart J 149: 61–66PubMed
19.
Ebell MH (1992) Prearrest predictors of survival following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract 34: 551–558PubMed
20.
Hillman K, Parr M, Flabouris A, Bishop G, Stewart A (2001) Redefining in-hospital resuscitation: the concept of the medical emergency team. Resuscitation 48: 105–110PubMed
21.
The MERIT study investigators (2005) Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365: 2091–2097
22.
Sovik O, Naess AC (1997) Incidence and content of written guidelines for „do not resuscitate“ orders. Survey at six different somatic hospitals in Oslo. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 117: 4206–4209PubMed
23.
Bonnin MJ, Pepe PE, Kimball KT, Clark PS Jr (1993) Distinct criteria for termination of resuscitation in the out-of-hospital setting. JAMA 270: 1457–1462PubMed
24.
Kellermann AL, Hackman BB, Somes G (1993) Predicting the outcome of unsuccessful prehospital advanced cardiac life support. JAMA 270: 1433–1436PubMed
25.
Steen S, Liao Q, Pierre L, Paskevicius A, Sjoberg T (2002) Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation 55: 285–299PubMed
26.
Naess A, Steen E, Steen P (1997) Ethics in treatment decisions during out-of-hospital resuscitation. Resuscitation 35: 245–256
27.
Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (2001) Newsletter 1996 and 2001. Royal College of Physicians., London
28.
Doyle CJ, Post H, Burney RE, Maino J, Keefe M, Rhee KJ (1987) Family participation during resuscitation: an option. Ann Emerg Med 16: 673–675PubMed
29.
Adams S, Whitlock M, Higgs R, Bloomfield P, Baskett PJ (1994) Should relatives be allowed to watch resuscitation? BMJ 308: 1687–1692PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Hanson C, Strawser D (1992) Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Foote Hospital emergency department’s nine-year perspective. J Emerg Nurs 18: 104–106PubMed
31.
32.
Gregory CM (███) I should have been with Lisa as she died. Accid Emerg Nurs 3: 136–138
33.
Boie ET, Moore GP, Brummett C, Nelson DR (1999) Do parents want to be present during invasive procedures performed on their children in the emergency department? A survey of 400 parents. Ann Emerg Med 34: 70–74PubMed
34.
Boudreaux ED, Francis JL, Loyacano T (2002) Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitations in the emergency department: a critical review and suggestions for future research. Ann Emerg Med 40: 193–205PubMed
35.
Martin J (1991) Rethinking traditional thoughts. J Emerg Nurs 17: 67–68PubMed
36.
Robinson SM, Mackenzie-Ross S, Campbell Hewson GL, Egleston CV, Prevost AT (1998) Psychological effect of witnessed resuscitation on bereaved relatives. Lancet 352: 614–617PubMed
37.
Baskett PJF (2004) The ethics of resuscitation. In: Colquhoun MC, Handley AJ, Evans TR (eds) The ABC of Resuscitation, 5th edn. BMJ Publishing Group, London
38.
Azoulay E, Sprung CL (2004) Family-physician interactions in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 32: 2323–2328PubMed
39.
Bouchner H, Vinci R, Waring C (1989) Pediatric procedures: do parents want to watch? Pediatrics 84: 907–909
40.
Resuscitation Council (UK) Project Team (1996) Should relatives witness resuscitation? Resuscitation Council, London, UK
41.
Morag RM, DeSouza S, Steen PA et al. (2005) Performing procedures on the newly deceased for teaching purposes: what if we were to ask? Arch Intern Med 165: 92–96PubMed
42.
US Department of Health and Human Services (1996) Protection of Human Subjects: Informed Consent and Waiver of Informed Consent requirements in certain emergency circumstances. 61 Federal Register 51528 (1996) codified at CFR #50.24 and #46.408
43.
Fontaine N, Rosengren B (2001) Directive/20/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 4th April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of trials on medical products for human use. J Europ Comm 121: 34–44
44.
Lemaire F, Bion J, Blanco J et al. (2005) The European Union Directive on Clinical Research: present status of implementation in EU member states‘ legislations with regard to the incompetent patient. Intensive Care Med 31: 476–479PubMed
45.
Nichol G, Huszti E, Rokosh J, Dumbrell A, McGowan J, Becker L (2004) Impact of informed consent requirements on cardiac arrest research in the United States: exception from consent or from research? Resuscitation 62: 3–23PubMed
46.
Mosesso VN Jr, Brown LH, Greene HL et al. (2004) Conducting research using the emergency exception from informed consent: the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial experience. Resuscitation 61: 29–36PubMed
47.
Sterz F, Singer EA, Bottiger B et al. (2002) A serious threat to evidence based resuscitation within the European Union. Resuscitation 53: 237–238PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Ethik der Reanimation und Entscheidungen am Lebensende
Abschnitt 8 der Leitlinien zur Reanimation 2005 des European Resuscitation Council
verfasst von
P. J. F. Baskett
P. A. Steen
L. Bossaert
Dr. J. Bahr
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2006
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin / Ausgabe 1/2006
Print ISSN: 1434-6222
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-0578
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-006-0795-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2006

Kreislaufstillstand unter besonderen Umständen

  • Schwerpunkt: ERC-Leitlinien

Initiales Management von Patienten mit akutem Koronarsyndrom

  • Schwerpunkt: ERC-Leitlinien

Prinzipien des Trainings in der Wiederbelebung

  • Schwerpunkt: ERC-Leitlinien

Lebensrettende Basismaßnahmen für Erwachsene und Verwendung automatisierter externer Defibrillatoren

  • Schwerpunkt: ERC-Leitlinien

Erweiterte Reanimationsmaßnahmen für Erwachsene (ALS)

  • Schwerpunkt: ERC-Leitlinien

Lebensrettende Maßnahmen bei Kindern (Paediatric Life Support, PLS)

  • Schwerpunkt: ERC-Leitlinien