Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Research

Generational diversity in nursing practice environments – scoping review

verfasst von: Diana Sanches, Soraia Pereira, Susana Castro, Mariana Mendes, Eduardo Santos, Olga Ribeiro

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Introduction

Generational diversity in nursing has introduced new challenges, for nurse managers and practice environments, in addressing both the nurses’ and clients’ needs and organizations’ social and health policies. The organizational climate encourages professionals to preserve positive practice environments, which promotes a healthy coexistence between generations, respecting their distinctive characteristics and values, with the essential purpose of ensuring the team’s effectiveness and the organization’s success.

Objective

To map the available scientific evidence on the generational diversity of nurses in professional practice environments.

Methods

Scoping review, according to the Joanna Briggs Institute proposed methodology. The search used the PCC (Population, Concept and Context) framework to locate both published and unpublished studies, with no time or language limitations.

Results

Thirty-two studies analysed different aspects from a generational diversity perspective, such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, engagement, stress and burnout, work-related values and attitudes, turnover and retention. Although the findings differ, it’s undeniable that each generation has a unique and valuable role, and it’s essential to promote an effective balance between generations to build a diverse workforce capable of adapting to different challenges in professional contexts.

Conclusion

Organizations should acknowledge the importance of creating inclusive professional practice environments, where both current and future generations can contribute to providing quality care. This requires integrating strategies adapted to generational diversity and adopting a more flexible leadership style. Organizations should foster the challenges of an increasingly diverse society and reflect the generational diversity of nurses, providing truly inclusive and equitable care.
Hinweise

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Recent economic, social, and demographic changes have introduced factors such as increased life expectancy, impacting the retirement age of older generations [1], leading to the coexistence of four and, in some cases, five generations in the workplace [2]. Nurses’ practice environments have faced the challenge, of accommodating several generations of nurses, creating complex and diverse workplaces. The growing number of studies in this area highlighted an opportunity to better understand the professional needs and expectations of a multigenerational nursing workforce [1, 2]. Although no consensual definition of a generation is found in the literature, it is widely accepted that individuals within the same generational cohort have experienced similar life events (economic, technological, or political changes) that influence their attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, and values throughout their lives [3, 4]. However, the generational age cohort remains unclear, and the differences regarding the exact periods of each generation are a major criticism of generational studies [5, 6]. Nonetheless, Christensen et al. (2018), suggest dividing generations into: Traditionalists or Veterans (born between 1922 and 1945), Baby Boomers (born between 1946 and 1964), Generation X (born between 1965 and 1979), Generation Y or Millennials (born between 1980 and 1995), and Generation Z (born after 1995) [7].
Concerning the work and the health workforce, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that by 2030, there will be a shortage of 18 million health professionals, which will place even greater pressure on health systems [8]. While generational diversity can be seen as a significant benefit, in complex environments such as health organizations, it can also lead to conflicts, miscommunications, differences in organizational commitment, job dissatisfaction, and even higher levels of turnover [9, 10]. Therefore, it is urgent to acknowledge the work expectations of an increasingly generational diverse workforce, to improve health and professional outcomes for clients, nurses, and health organizations. Tackling these challenges will enable the development of strategies sensitive to nurses’ generational diversity, aimed at promoting the integration of different generations in professional practice environments [1].
A preliminary search on MEDLINE® (via PubMed), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Evidence Synthesis, PROSPERO, and Open Science Framework (OSF) databases identified only one systematic review that focused on describing and summarizing nurses’ workplace characteristics of three generations: Baby Boomers, Generation X (Gen X) and Generation Y (Gen Y) [11]. Some conflicting findings were revealed, highlighting the need for more rigorous investigations. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic further transformed the nursing workforce with a significant influx of Generation Z (Gen Z) nurses [12]. Given the importance of understanding all generations’ professional needs and expectations, a scoping review was conducted to map the available scientific literature on the generational diversity of nurses in professional practice environments. This scoping review aims to answer the following question: “What is the scientific evidence on nurses’ generational diversity in professional practice environments?”

Methodology

Design

This review followed the methodological guidelines proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for scoping reviews [13] and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) [14] were followed when writing this paper. The review protocol was developed and registered on Open Science Framework (DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​17605/​OSF.​IO/​6M8P7).

Eligibility criteria

According to the JBI methodology, the eligibility criteria were defined using the Participants (P), Concept (C), and Context (C) reference framework [13, 14]. Studies including nurses (P), which addressed generational diversity in professional practice environments, and explored the relationships between nurses of different generations; the implications of generational diversity for practice environments or professional practice (engagement, organizational commitment, stress, burnout, communication, job satisfaction, retention, intent to leave or intent to stay) or the changes in work-related attitudes and values between different generations of nurses, in all nurses’ settings (C). Published studies, literature reviews, theses, dissertations, and gray literature were considered, with no time or language limits.

Search strategy

An initial limited search was conducted in MEDLINE® (via PubMed) and CINAHL® Complete (via EBSCOhost) databases, to identify index terms in titles and abstracts. Through the analysis of titles, abstracts, and keywords/index terms, a comprehensive search strategy was formulated, using a process of gradual refinement, combining keywords and MeSH descriptors, adapted to the specific requirements of each database, and using Boolean phrases. In October 2023, using all keywords and index terms identified, a full search was conducted in Medline® (via PubMed), CINAHL® Complete (via EBSCOhost), Business Source Ultimate® (via EBSCOhost) and SCOPUS® databases. To identify gray literature, a search was performed on ProQuest - Dissertations and Theses® and Worldcat®. Table 1 presents the search strategy adopted in the included databases, and the keywords or index terms used in this research. In the third phase, the reference lists of the included studies were reviewed to identify any additional relevant studies according to the eligibility criteria.
Table 1
Database search strategy and results
Database: PubMed (Medline). Search conducted on October 13, 2023. Results: 128 ((“nurses“[MeSH Terms] OR “nurs*” [Title/Abstract] OR “nursing staff” [Title/Abstract] OR “nurse practitioner” [Title/Abstract] “intergenerational relations” [MeSH Terms] OR “Generation Y” [Title/Abstract] OR “millennial generation” [Title/Abstract] OR “Generation z” [Title/Abstract] OR “baby boomer*” [Title/Abstract] OR “millennial” [Title/Abstract] OR “generational diversity” [Title/Abstract] OR “Generation X” [Title/Abstract] OR “generational differences” [Title/Abstract] “workplace” [MeSH Terms] OR “work environment” [Title/Abstract] OR “working conditions” [MeSH Terms] OR “work setting” [Title/Abstract] OR “professional practice” [MeSH Terms] OR “practice environment” [Title/Abstract] OR “positive work environment” [Title/Abstract]))))
Database: CINAHL (EBSCO). Search conducted on October 16, 2023. Results: 95 (AB ((MH “staff nurses”) OR (MM “nurses”) OR “nurs*” OR “nurse practitioners” OR “nursing staff”) AB ((MH “Intergenerational Relations”) OR (MH “Generation Y”) OR (MH “Generation X”) OR (MH “Baby Boomers”) OR “Generation Y” OR “millennial generation” OR “Generation z” OR “baby boomer*” OR “millennial” OR “generational diversity” OR “generational differences”) AB ((MM “work environment”) OR (MH “professional practice”) OR work environment OR working conditions OR work setting OR practice environment OR positive work environment))
Database: Business Source Ultimate (EBSCO). Search conducted on October 16, 2023. Results: 7 (AB ((MH “staff nurses”) OR (MM “nurses”) OR “nurs*” OR “nurse practitioners” OR “nursing staff”) AB ((MH “Intergenerational Relations”) OR (MH “Generation Y”) OR (MH “Generation X”) OR (MH “Baby Boomers”) OR “Generation Y” OR “millennial generation” OR “Generation z” OR “baby boomer*” OR “millennial” OR “generational diversity” OR “generational differences”) AB ((MM “work environment”) OR (MH “professional practice”) OR work environment OR working conditions OR work setting OR practice environment OR positive work environment))
Database: Scopus. Search conducted on October 16, 2023. Results:78 ABS (“nurses” OR “nurs*” OR “nursing staff” OR “nurse practitioner”) ABS (“intergenerational relations” OR “Generation Y” OR “millennial generation” OR “Generation z” OR “baby boomer*” OR “millennial” OR “generational diversity” OR “Generation X” OR “generational differences”) ABS (“workplace” OR “work environment” OR “working conditions” OR “work setting” OR “professional practice” OR “practice environment” OR “positive work environment”) ABS ( “nurses” OR “nurs*” OR “nursing staff” OR “nurse practitioner” ) AND ABS (“intergenerational relations” OR “Generation Y” OR “millennial generation” OR “Generation z” OR “baby boomer*” OR “millennial” OR “generational diversity” OR “Generation X” OR “generational differences” ) AND ABS ( “workplace” OR “work environment” OR “working conditions” OR “work setting” OR “professional practice” OR “practice environment” OR “positive work environment” ))
Database: Worldcat. Search conducted on October 16, 2023. Results: 5. Source type: Dissertations and Theses. Search strategy: Kw: nurse AND kw: intergenerational relations Filter: Theses and Dissertations
Database: ProQuest. Search conducted on October 16, 2023. Results: 80. Source type: Dissertations and Theses Search strategy: Abstract (nurse) AND (intergenerational relations) Filter: Theses and Dissertations

Study selection

All studies were cataloged and imported into the Rayyan® platform (Qatar Computing Research Institute, Doha, Qatar). Duplicate studies were identified and excluded. All titles and abstracts were read and analyzed to assess relevance, and studies meeting the eligibility criteria were retrieved for full-text review. Two independent reviewers analyzed and selected the studies. Any reviewer’s disagreement was resolved through constructive discussion or by consulting a third reviewer. Research results were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) [14] and presented using a PRISMA flowchart [15] (Fig. 1).

Data extraction

Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers, using an extraction tool developed by the authors. The extracted data included specific details such as authors, year of publication, country, study design, participants, and relevant findings. No contact with the authors of the included studies was necessary for additional information or clarification.

Data analysis and presentation

The extracted data was presented in a tabular form, accompanied by a narrative synthesis that describes how the results relate to the aim of this review. Additionally, thematic analysis according to the principles proposed by Bardin was used to better understand and categorize the data [16]. Atlas.ti 24 software was used as a data visualization tool, to create, organize and assemble categories and subcategories.

Results

After careful analysis, 32 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included. Table 2 provides a descriptive summary of the relevant aspects of each included study.
Table 2
Summary of included studies
Authors/year/country
Study design and Participants
Results/Conclusions
Tan & Chin, 2023 [17]
Singapore
Cross-sectional study
778 nurses
The emphasis on work-life balance is greater as the generation gets younger. Gen Y and Z are more easily adaptable to change.
Lee & Lee, 2023 [9]
South Korea
Cross-sectional study
159 nurses
Job satisfaction and organizational commitment are higher in Gen X than in the following generations. There were no differences between the generations in terms of types of communication.
Pawlak et al., 2022 [18]
Poland
Literature review
Baby Boomers and Gen X reveal greater organizational commitment. Gen Y and Gen Z show a greater need for work-life balance. Gen Z shows higher expectations towards leadership.
White et al., 2021 [19]
Australia
Cross-sectional study
18,963 nurses
Job satisfaction was highest among Gen Z, followed by Gen Y, Baby Boomers and Gen X. All generations expressed satisfaction with their work-life balance.
Oliveira & González, 2021 [10]
Spain
Integrative review
Older generations showed greater organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Gen X and Gen Y nurses consider the right balance between professional and personal life significant.
Peter et al., 2021 [20]
Switzerland
Cross-sectional study
98 midwives
The intention to leave the organization was higher for the younger generations (X and Y) than for Baby Boomers.
The intention to leave the profession prematurely increases when the balance between professional and personal life is compromised.
Cantada & Lee, 2020 [21]
South Korea
Descriptive and correlational study
256 nurses
Job satisfaction is lower for Gen Z nurses than Gen Y nurses, and lower for Gen Y nurses than Gen X nurses. Time availability for private life is more valued in Gen Y and Z.
Campbell et al., 2020 [22]
United States of America (USA)
Concept analysis
Gen Y attaches greater importance to areas such as salary, free time, personal interactions at work, benefits of the job, and support from their managers/leaders. Gen X attaches importance to factors related to nursing practice, such as autonomy.
Stevanin et al., 2020 [23]
Finland
Cross-sectional study
3,093 nurses
All generations report positive feelings about teamwork with colleagues from different generations. All generations consider themselves to be oriented toward change and use of technology, with Baby Boomers reporting a slightly lower propensity. Gen Y nurses generally need more feedback than those from other generations.
Hisel 2019 [24]
USA
Quantitative, non-experimental study
1885 nurses
Veterans were the most engaged, followed by Baby Boomers, Gen X and Gen Y.
O’Hara et al., 2019 [25]
USA
Descriptive and correlational study
825 nurses
Autonomy, teamwork, leadership, and motivation contribute to the job satisfaction of Gen Y nurses.
Stevanin et al., 2019 [26]
Finland
Descriptive and correlational study
3,218 nurses
Peer relationships are more important for Baby Boomers than for other generations. Baby Boomers and Gen X revealed themselves to be less change-oriented than Gen Y nurses.
Huber & Schubert, 2019 [27]
Germany
Cross-sectional study
992 nurses
Gen Y has a lower engagement level than Gen X and Baby Boomers. “Professional ambition” is more valued by Gen Y than by previous generations.
Christensen et al., 2018 [7]
USA
Literature review
Intergenerational differences, although challenging, can be used advantageously to boost efficiency and create more cohesive teams through comprehensive communication strategies, personalized reward systems, and flexibility in the workplace.
Stevanin et al., 2018 [11]
Finland
Systematic review of mixed methods
Baby Boomers report lower stress levels and burnout than Gen X and Y. Gen Y seem more sensitive to stress. Baby Boomers report higher job satisfaction and engagement and Gen Y lower job satisfaction and engagement.
Stevanin et al., 2017 [28]
Finland
Cross-sectional study
1302 nurses
The Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire proved to be an instrument capable of detecting the perceptions of different generations of nurses in various dimensions: “Conflicts between generations”, “View of patient safety”, “Relationship issues between generations”, “Working in a multigenerational team”, “Orientation to change”, Presenteeism and job propensity”, “Intention to leave” and “Flexibility and availability”.
Lavoie-Tremblay et al., 2014 [29]
Canada
Descriptive and correlational study
1254 nurses
Faced with high cognitive demands, Gen X nurses reported less psychological distress than Gen Y nurses. In professional contexts with high physical demands, Gen Y nurses reported less psychological distress than Gen X nurses.
Wakim, 2014 [30]
USA
Descriptive and correlational study
262 nurses
Gen Y nurses scored the highest on the Stress Perception Scale compared to Gen X and Baby Boomers.
Sullivan Havens et al., 2013 [31]
USA
Descriptive, correlational study
747 nurses
Veterans showed higher engagement and Gen X showed lower engagement. The nursing practice environment emerged as a predictor of engagement, common to all generations.
Hendricks & Cope, 2013 [32]
Australia
Literature review
Respect for generational differences in communication, commitment, and compensation should be a factor for nurse managers. Different characteristics were presented for nurses from the four generations. Veterans: loyal and hardworking; Baby Boomers: idealistic and passionate; Gen X: adapted to technology; Gen Y: optimistic.
Shacklock & Brunetto, 2012 [33]
Australia
Descriptive and correlational study
900 nurses
When analyzing nurse retention, there are differences in the variables that affect Baby Boomers, Gen X and Y. Attachment to work was the only variable that proved to be common to all generations and that influences the intention to remain in the organization.
Leiter et al., 2010 [34]
Canada
Descriptive and correlational study 522 nurses
Greater distress among Gen X nurses. There is a greater tendency among younger nurses to leave the organization. Gen X also reported more difficulties in relationships with peers and the supervisor.
Stanley, 2010 [35]
Australia
Literature review
Distinctive characteristics of Baby Boomers, Gen X and Gen Y in work-related aspects. Baby Boomers: strong work ethic. Gen X: greater need for work-life balance, and technological literacy. Gen Y: technological literacy.
Keepnews et al., 2010 [36]
USA
Longitudinal study
3380 nurses
Gen X obtained a higher score when analyzing the work-family conflict. Gen Y showed greater organizational commitment than Gen X and Baby Boomers.
Wieck et al., 2010 [37]
USA
Mixed methods study
1773 nurses
Baby Boomers were more satisfied than Gen X and Gen Y. Gen Y showed a greater propensity to turnover than previous generations. 61% of all nurses from the four generations analyzed said they intended to leave the organization in the next 10 years.
Lipscomb, 2010 [38]
USA
Cross-sectional study
77 nurses
Baby Boomers and Gen X ranked autonomy as their top priority. Gen Y’s priority was remuneration.
Dols et al., 2010 [39]
USA
Qualitative study
25 nurses
Younger generations value more feedback. Gen X and Y value a better work-life balance.
Leiter et al., 2009 [40]
Canada
Descriptive and correlational study
448 nurses
Gen X find working life less coherent with their values, more stressful, have more burnout symptoms, and are more inclined to change organizations than Baby Boomer nurses.
Carver & Candela, 2008 [41]
USA
Literature review
Veterans: value loyalty and recognition for their work; strong work ethic. Baby Boomers: value recognition for their work. Gen X: lower work ethic; value autonomy and work-family balance. Gen Y: values teamwork, greater need for feedback, and extended orientation/integration period.
Wilson-Keates et al., 2008 [42]
Canada
Descriptive and correlational study
6541 nurses
There are no differences between the three generations in satisfaction with relationships between coworkers. No differences were found between Gen X and Gen Y nurses regarding overall job satisfaction, however, Baby Boomers showed greater job satisfaction than subsequent generations.
Apostolidis & Polifroni, 2006 [43]
USA
Descriptive and correlational study
98 nurses
Baby Boomers prefer autonomy to professional status. Gen X is more satisfied with professional status and less satisfied with pay.
Sherman, 2006, [44]
USA
Literature review
Veterans: value loyalty and hierarchy. Baby Boomers: strong work ethic. Gen X: value work-life balance. Gen Y: global and multicultural generation; fans of technology and instant communication.
The methodological analysis of the included studies revealed a predominance of quantitative studies (n = 21), twenty of which were descriptive, correlational and cross-sectional and only one longitudinal study. All studies were published between 2006 and 2023 and originate from the Unites States of America (USA) (n = 13), Finland (n = 4), Australia (n = 4), Canada (n = 4) and South Korea (n = 2). Additionally, Singapore, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, and Poland each contributed one study. Thirty-one studies were written in English, and one was written in Korean.
The instruments used in the quantitative studies were highly diverse, with 43 different instruments identified. However, only one instrument (The Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire - MNGQ) measures the characteristics of various generations of nurses in professional practice environments. It analyzes eight dimensions: “Conflicts between generations”, “Patient safety view”, “Relationship between generations”, “Working as a multigenerational team”, “Orientation to change”, “Presenteeism and job propensity”, “Intention to leave” and “Flexibility and availability”. This instrument is based on each generational cohort’s characteristics and enables monitoring different aspects that could impact the efficiency, effectiveness, productivity, and quality of nursing care [17, 18].
In the qualitative [19] and mixed methods [20] studies, focus groups were used as the data collection technique.
The analysis of the included studies was organized into five categories: (1) Generations in nursing; (2) Relevance attributed to work; (3) Relevance attributed to leadership; (4) Relevance attributed to the relationship between nurses and health organizations; (5) Strategies to improve professional practice environments.
Figure 2 illustrates the categories and subcategories that emerged from the analysis.

Generations in nursing

Few studies in nursing examined all generational groups. Findings identified only two studies focused on the simultaneous analysis of five generations and their impact on professional practice environments [7, 21]. The remaining studies focused on different combinations of four generations cohorts (Veterans, Baby Boomers, Gen X, and Y or Baby Boomers, Gen X, Y, and Z) [10, 2229], three generations cohorts (Baby Boomers, Gen X and Y or Gen X, Y, and Z) [9, 11, 1720, 3039], two generations cohorts (Gen X and Baby Boomers or Gen X and Y) [4043], and one study dealing only with Ger Y [44]. Gen X was the most studied generation [7, 911, 1743], followed by Gen Y [7, 911, 1740, 44].

Relevance attributed to work

The studies included in this review revealed changes in how nurses perceive work and professional relationships, with five subcategories emerging: (i) attitudes towards work (ii) work-life balance; (iii) professional communication (iv) professional relationships and teamwork; and (v) use of technology.

Attitudes towards work

Findings reveal quite different data regarding attitudes towards work for each generation. Veterans were described as disciplined in their work habits [7, 28, 29], with strong work ethic [28], dedicated [10, 21, 25, 29], averse to risk and change [7, 21], hardworking [7, 21, 27] and loyal to the organization [7, 10, 25, 2729]. On the other hand, although Baby Boomers share a strong ethic with the previous generation [10, 21, 23, 29], they also reveal distinct characteristics such as professionalism [23], autonomy [21, 23], competitiveness [7, 27, 28], idealism [37] and optimism [7, 21, 23, 25, 34]. The importance of work in their lives is highlighted [21, 25], as they were often viewed as workaholics [23, 2729], and focused on results [23, 28]. They are usually committed to their organizations, enjoy meaningful work [35], and appreciate being valued [24, 29] and recognized [23, 27, 28].
Gen X shares the previous generation´s orientation towards results [21, 27, 28], but they are referred to as being less focused on financial aspects and less loyal to the organizational culture [29]. They prefer professional practice environments where their talent, creativity, and experience are appreciated [23, 41]. Unlike previous generations, they value autonomy [7, 24, 27, 28], flexibility [7, 28], diversity, and informality [21, 25].
Valuing flexibility is a common characteristic of generations X, Y, and Z [7, 27]. In addition, Gen Y is characterized as highly qualified, dynamic, easily adaptable to changing situations [10, 21, 25, 27, 28], confident, multicultural, and able to carry out several tasks simultaneously [21, 24]. They are often compared to Veterans regarding work-related values [29]. Like Gen Y, Gen Z is highly qualified in theoretical knowledge but has difficulties applying it to practice [23]. Gen Z is described as optimistic, confident, entrepreneurial, pragmatic, and realistic. They value continuous professional development [23] and, like Gen X and Baby Boomers, they are results-oriented [7].

Work-life balance

Analysis of the relationship between personal and professional life revealed that younger generations, particularly Gen Y and Gen Z, have a greater need for a better work-life balance compared to previous generations, particularly Baby Boomers [7, 10, 11, 19, 2125, 2731, 35].
Campbell et al. (2020) found that Gen Y nurses emphasize the importance of this balance to build favorable practice environments [32]. They also consider that interference in work-life balance, due to inadequate staffing and high workload, significantly impacts the quality of nursing care [19].

Professional communication

Differences emerged between generations regarding the growing digitalization and increased use of virtual communication channels. Gen Y and Z nurses prefer digital communication, while older generations favor direct interaction [7, 10, 23, 24, 2729].
Gen Z appreciates social media as a common form of communication and, although they are described as interactive and very creative, they are referred to as having more difficulty communicating effectively in teams [23, 24].
One study examining generations X, Y, and Z reported no differences in communication style preferences among these generations [9].

Professional relationship and teamwork

Baby Boomers exhibited well-developed social skills and loyalty to their coworkers [23, 43], while Gen X was more individualistic [20] and less inclined toward teamwork [27]. Gen Y nurses established strong social relationships [7], and valued teamwork and diversity [10, 21, 25, 27, 28]. Similarly, Gen Z appreciated teamwork [7, 23] and seemed more oriented toward social change and social causes, comparatively to previous generations [7, 23].
Findings indicated that all generations considered teamwork fundamental in promoting favorable practice environments, although they prioritize it differently [32]. Furthermore, belonging to a particular generation did not seem to influence professional relationships with nurses from other generations [33, 37].

Use of technology

Studies showed that all generations perceived themselves as oriented toward change and acknowledged the use of technology as essential. However, Baby Boomer nurses reported slightly lower levels of adaptability [33]. This finding aligns with the characteristics of Baby Boomers [7], who were not raised in a technology-dominated society. It is important to note that this should not be seen as discriminatory when implementing technological innovations in professional practice environments [33]. On the other hand, some authors have shown that Baby Boomers and Gen X experienced a higher level of difficulty with technology use in professional practice environments, compared to Gen Y and Z [17, 22].

Relevance attributed to leadership

The included studies also found differences in how each generation values leadership and their expectations of the leader’s performance within teams and organizations.

Perception of the leader

Veterans appreciated authority figures [7, 10, 21, 27, 29] and preferred organizational bureaucracy [7, 21, 27, 29], thriving to work in traditional and highly hierarchical organizational structures [7, 10, 21, 27, 29]. In contrast, younger generations were less inclined toward overly hierarchical structures [23] and perceived the leader as a mentor [7]. Nonetheless, all generations appreciated leaders’ reliability, transparency, honesty, and support [19, 20].

Expectations of the leader’s performance

Gen Y demonstrated satisfaction with rotating leadership positions within their teams [28] and appreciated participation and collaboration in organizational decisions [21]. O’Hara et al. (2019), attributed to the support of their leaders 63% of Gen Y nurses’ job satisfaction [44]. Gen Z nurses also mentioned leadership support as an important factor in work recognition [23]. Also, nurses from younger generations showed a greater need for extended orientation periods and immediate positive feedback [7, 34]. In contrast, older generations emphasized the importance of being valued and respected [19, 20].

Relevance attributed to the relationship between nurses and health organizations

The included studies reflected the growing concern of health organizations in assessing the relationship between different generations of nurses and professional practice environments. In this context, four subcategories emerged: (i) engagement and organizational commitment; (ii) turnover/retention; (iii) stress/burnout; and (iv) job satisfaction.

Engagement and organizational commitment

Engagement and organizational commitment showed similar results, which were higher in older generations, with Veterans and Baby Boomers generations standing out [10, 11, 23, 25, 26, 31, 34]. On the other hand, Gen X, Gen Y, and Gen Z [10, 17, 23, 25, 31] showed lower engagement and organizational commitment levels, with Gen Z showing the lowest levels. There were conflicting findings regarding the position of Gen Y compared to other generations [26, 37], with one study reporting that Gen Y showed greater organizational commitment than Gen X and Baby Boomer nurses [37]. Other research revealed that Gen Y showed a higher engagement level than Gen X [26].

Turnover/retention

Turnover/retention and its predictors also reported generational differences. According to the findings, the intention to leave among Gen X and Y nurses was higher than for Baby Boomers [11, 23, 30, 33]. There were also similar results regarding turnover intentions, which reflected a greater propensity for turnover in younger generations [20, 42], with Gen Y being more prone to frequent job changes [20]. At the same time, there was no conclusive data on turnover intentions in Gen Z in the studies included in this scoping. In addition, Gen Y is commonly described as easy to recruit and difficult to retain [7] and will not hesitate to leave unchallenging and unsupportive organizations [28]. However, one of the studies that focused on the intention to leave found no significant differences between generations in the intention to leave [37].
In addition, an analysis of intention to leave predictors [36] also revealed several generational challenges. Baby Boomers mentioned a set of variables such as conflict between work and family; autonomy; attachment to work; interpersonal relationships and the importance attributed to work [36], Gen X mentioned attachment to work and the relationship with the supervisor [36] and, Gen Y revealing only attachment to work as the only variable influencing retention [36].

Stress/burnout

Gen X nurses experienced working lives less consistent with their professional values and reported more burnout symptoms [42] and higher stress levels than Baby Boomers [35, 41]. Compared to Gen Y nurses, Gen X nurses reported less psychological distress in more complex professional contexts [40]. On the other hand, in situations where human and material resources were less available, Gen Y nurses reported less psychological distress than Gen X nurses [40].

Job satisfaction

Some studies analyzed the influence of generational cohort on nurses’ job satisfaction, with Gen X and Y nurses reporting lower satisfaction levels than Baby Boomer nurses [38, 39]. Gen X nurses showed greater job satisfaction than younger generations, while Gen Z nurses showed the lowest job satisfaction levels [9, 31]. In addition, Baby Boomers were most satisfied with extrinsic rewards, professional opportunities, professional appreciation, and recognition [39]. In this generation payment and autonomy were the most significant dimensions for job satisfaction [38, 43], while for Gen Y was payment [38].

Strategies to improve professional practice environments

Several studies have reinforced the importance of adopting strategies to improve practice environments [9, 2024, 2629, 3133, 35, 36, 43]. Four types of strategies have been identified: (i) training on generational diversity for nurses and leaders; (ii) collaborative management and flexibility; (iii) mentoring and professional development; and (iv) feedback and professional recognition.

Training on generational diversity for nurses and leaders

The implementation of training programs on generational diversity in nursing teams, both for nurses and leaders, that identify what each generation values and prioritizes, emerged as an essential aspect of the harmonization of relations between nurses from different generations [9, 2024, 2629, 3133, 35, 36, 43].
Working conditions should consider each generation’s distinctive characteristics, such as tangible rewards for Baby Boomers, greater flexibility and use of creativity for Gen X, or longer integration periods for Gen Y [7, 17, 20, 28, 29]. Encouraging effective communication between nurses from different generations and promoting opportunities to share skills, successes, concerns and frustrations [7, 27, 29, 37, 43] have also emerged as a strategy for creating generational conciliation [29].

Collaborative management and flexibility

Nursing leaders should promote more flexible working conditions that allow innovative approaches to managing working hours, workloads, shift distribution, and physical demands inherent to nursing care [11, 19, 2124, 26, 31, 33, 34, 37]. This premise is even more important when focusing on younger generations, who value work-life balance more and appreciate greater leisure activity availability [9, 21, 30, 31]. Findings also highlighted the importance of using a more integrative leadership style allowing each generation to appropriately participate in decision-making and clinical governance, representing the generational diversity of professional practice environments [11, 1921, 34, 37, 39].

Mentoring and professional development

To generations X, Y, and Z, professional development has proved to be central to their expectations [23]. Encouraging nurses to value themselves through professional development seems to empower them and contribute to professional autonomy [9, 19, 29, 33, 39].
Mentoring programs could also play a key role in integrating generational diversity into professional practice environments [7, 19, 27, 38], such as using a higher technological competence from Gen Y and Z to support older generations, while valuing the professional experience of Baby Boomers and Gen X in transferring knowledge to younger generations [7, 22, 25, 33, 37]. Mentoring programs are also mentioned to address increased stress levels for younger and older generations [40, 41].

Feedback and professional recognition

Recognition, support, and regular feedback on professional performance from leaders emerged as factors valued across all generations of nurses, with greater emphasis on younger generations [19, 32, 34]. Therefore, creating an inclusive practice environment, where daily challenges are perceived as professional development opportunities, encourages adequate communication and regular feedback, allowing nurses from different generations to reflect more on their professional practice and identifying opportunities for continuous improvement and professional growth [7].

Discussion

The studies analyzed identified a lack of consistency in the chronology of the generations, which relates to the diversity of time limits for each generational cohort. Gen Z, the youngest generation, reveals the greatest discrepancies in its time limits. Also, individuals born at the time limits of each generation, referred to in the literature as cuspers, combine characteristics of two generational groups [41]. Both these aspects are seen as limitations, making comparisons of the findings more difficult. Leiter et al. (2010) even eliminated nurses identified as cuspers from their study, to accentuate the distinctive characteristics of each generational cohort.
Studies show that the generational factor may represent a dividing point in behaviors and attitudes toward work. Social changes to the 20th-century model of society, built around the value and meaning attributed to work, have become increasingly clear. Today, there are new ways of understanding the social representations of work, which are becoming less central to people’s lives, in contrast to the attitudes towards work that older generations usually reveal. In this matter, while flexible and insecure work relations are becoming more frequent [45], several authors [7, 10, 11, 19, 2125, 2730, 35] stated that work-life balance is a fundamental aspect, especially for younger generations. As younger generations tend to dedicate more time to family or friends and pursue personal aspirations, obtaining flexibility from their leaders to better achieve work-life balance, could be an important strategy to make them feel respected and satisfied [46]. Likewise, the Delloite Global report (2024) also highlights the importance of reconciling work and family life for younger generations, particularly Gen Y and Gen Z, which stand as their main priority when choosing a workplace [47].
One of the difficulties pointed out by the coexistence of different generations in professional practice environments relates to communication and conflicts [9, 10] and, although these are important aspects, it was not clear from the findings that there’s an explicit contribution to conflicts or miscommunications in multigenerational workplaces. Instead, the results in this review indicated that, according to nurses’ perceptions, the generational diversity of teams does not seem to be a factor that increases conflicts in the workplace [33]. Some authors have mentioned the huge benefits of teamwork in generational diverse practice environments [33, 37]. So, although appropriate importance should be placed on avoiding generational conflicts in the workplace, the relevance given to this aspect should rather be placed on managing an age-diverse workforce of nurses using strategies adapted to different professional characteristics and expectations [33].
Leadership plays a central role in health organizations, as an essential factor guaranteeing the success of strategic management [48, 49]. In this category, generational differences in nurses’ perceptions and expectations of leaders’ performance became clearer. Findings show a transition from more hierarchical structures, preferred by Veterans, to increasingly horizontal organizational structures with a higher emphasis on collaborative management, preferred by younger generations. Also, nurses from younger generations stated their preference for a mentor as a leader, who promotes feedback and guidance [7, 23, 34]. Considering that younger generations appreciate participating in decision-making regarding organizational issues, nurse managers should be aware of these characteristics and promote their involvement in decisions as a useful strategy to enhance job satisfaction [46]. In addition, it is important to consider their preference for greater support and feedback and the expectation of more frequent communication with their leaders compared to previous generations to promote greater job satisfaction and commitment [46].
The global shortage of nurses, largely due to financial constraints, has contributed to unfavorable working environments, creating additional difficulties for health organizations which struggled even more with nurse retention issues and increased intent to leave [49]. In recent years, engagement, organizational commitment, turnover, intent to leave, and retention have become central areas for health organizations, finding increased difficulty in attracting and retaining nurses, especially from younger generations. This review also showed the growing concern for more research and strategies to retain nurses in healthcare organizations. Older generations demonstrated higher levels of engagement and organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and a lower tendency to turnover than younger generations. This seems to be anchored in higher relevance attributed to work given by older generations, such as Veterans and Baby Boomers [21, 28, 29]. In contrast, in younger generations, job insecurity perception, largely caused by precarity and increased devaluation of salaries, plays a major role in the relevance attributed to the relationship between nurses and health organizations [9]. Despite the obvious importance of these aspects, there is still a lack of acknowledgment by health organizations in their valorization, contributing to less favorable working conditions, and influencing the quality and safety of nursing care [5052]. Given the preferences of different generational groups, administrators and nurse managers must adopt strategies that promote not only the retention of younger generations but also the job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and engagement of older and younger generations. Intergenerational collaboration is therefore fundamental, so that younger generational groups are willing to take on the shared responsibility of shaping the future of the profession through leadership, autonomy, a sense of independence, and better professional opportunities, but also to bridge the gap in knowledge and experience between older and younger generations while consolidating organizational values [22].
Health and organizational policies that effectively aim to promote more favorable practice environments should be based on building better working conditions (nurse staffing, adequate resources, and leadership) [27], across all generations and enabling nurses to provide safe and quality care, recognizing their economic value amongst health professionals [7].
Nonetheless, there is a growing disruption in how organizations adjust to changes in health policies. The challenge lies in promoting an inclusive environment [53, 54], integrating the strengths of each professional and each generational cohort, and using these characteristics to develop cohesive multigenerational teams focused on teamwork and delivering quality care [29]. Therefore, health organizations and leaders can be decisive in promoting inclusive practice environments, by possessing a solid knowledge of each nurse generation’s characteristics, supporting younger generations to improve healthcare organizations, and keeping older generations’ experienced nurses committed to quality nursing care [27, 33, 40].
Nurse managers must understand that individuals from different generational groups have different sets of values and, therefore, it is essential to create synergies to harmoniously involve intergenerational groups in the workplace [22]. As more nurses from Gen Z are included in the nursing workforce and work alongside the most senior nurses, many nurse managers are learning that a one-size-fits-all management style simply does not exist. Each generation now working side-by-side brings unique viewpoints to the table and lets generation-specific values guide professional practice. Incorporating different motivational techniques into nurse management, adapted to generational characteristics should be a good incentive for nurses from different generations (For example, younger generations may appreciate more time off, while Veterans or Baby Boomers may appreciate a financial reward and public recognition) [46].
It is essential to create a positive and inviting culture that combines the best qualities of each generation. Baby Boomers are clinical experts and magnificent mentors. Gen X nurses are creative, willing to modernize care delivery models, and should be encouraged to adjust their working environments to new challenges. Gen Y members are technologically savvy and should be involved in teamwork, recognizing their skills. Finally, Gen Z is very dynamic, learning, working, communicating, and creating opportunities in a very different way from previous generations, leading organizations to redesign workplaces to meet their needs [7, 29].

Study limitations

The search strategy may not have detected relevant studies in this area once the research was conducted only in the mentioned databases. Also, the results identified only one longitudinal study, making it difficult to precise the generational cohort’s significant role in nurses’ professional practice environments. Therefore, it´s essential to develop new longitudinal studies to determine whether generational characteristics are perpetuated over time and the influence of new generations on work-related attitudes, behaviors, and nurse outcomes.
Historical and social events play a key role in the conceptual definition of generations, which may differ considerably between countries, making it difficult to generalize results or define global strategies sensitive to generational diversity. Despite that, identifying some characteristics present in individuals from each generation may be useful to establish an important basis for generational conciliation [46].

Conclusion

The recent economic, social, and demographic changes have led to the postponing of the retirement age which combined with the natural renewal of nurses in workplaces, culminated in the coexistence of multiple generations in professional practice environments. The findings in this scoping review allowed the identification of five categories that characterized the generational diversity of professional practice environments. In particular, the generations in nursing, the relevance attributed to work, the relevance attributed to leadership, the relevance attributed to the relationship between nurses and health organizations, and strategies that improve professional practice environments. These categories clarified differences and similarities between each nurse’s generational cohort. Findings revealed that generational diversity poses challenges for leaders and organizations, but also stands as an opportunity. Therefore, special emphasis should be placed on developing inclusive nursing practice environments, where younger and older generations can work harmoniously, providing quality care and improving professional outcomes.
Organizations must face the challenges of an increasingly diverse society, which is also reflected in the growing generational diversity of nurses, by promoting the implementation of improvement strategies for nurse managers, such as leadership training; mentoring programs; communication skills training; feedback mechanisms adapted to generational diversity, continuous professional development, and more flexible work policies.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Burton C, Mayhall C, Cross J, Patterson P. Critical elements for multigenerational teams: a systematic review. Team Performance Management: An International Journal. 2019:25(7/8);369–401. Emerald Publishing Limited 1352–7592. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-12-2018-0075 Accessed 6 May 2024. Burton C, Mayhall C, Cross J, Patterson P. Critical elements for multigenerational teams: a systematic review. Team Performance Management: An International Journal. 2019:25(7/8);369–401. Emerald Publishing Limited 1352–7592. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1108/​TPM-12-2018-0075 Accessed 6 May 2024.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Reeves TC, Oh EJ. Generational differences. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. Van Merrienboer, & M. Driscoll, editors, Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: 2007, 295–303. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 9780203880869. Reeves TC, Oh EJ. Generational differences. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. Van Merrienboer, & M. Driscoll, editors, Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: 2007, 295–303. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 9780203880869.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bardin L. 2016. Content Analysis. São Paulo: Almedina Edições 70. ISBN 9788562938047. Bardin L. 2016. Content Analysis. São Paulo: Almedina Edições 70. ISBN 9788562938047.
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Apostolidis BM, Polifroni EC, Nov. 36(11):506–9. Apostolidis BM, Polifroni EC, Nov. 36(11):506–9.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen M, Asvang M. Generations in the Workplace: An Exploration of Work Values, and Leadership Needs and Desires of Younger Employees. Master’s thesis in Management of Technology. 2024. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3152392. Accessed 25 November 2024. Christensen M, Asvang M. Generations in the Workplace: An Exploration of Work Values, and Leadership Needs and Desires of Younger Employees. Master’s thesis in Management of Technology. 2024. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. https://​hdl.​handle.​net/​11250/​3152392. Accessed 25 November 2024.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke A, Walker L, Clendon J. September. Managing intergenerational nursing teams: evidence from the literature. The Free Library (September,1) https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Managing intergenerational nursing teams: evidence from the literature. The Free Library 01 2015. Accessed 10 May 2024. Burke A, Walker L, Clendon J. September. Managing intergenerational nursing teams: evidence from the literature. The Free Library (September,1) https://​www.​thefreelibrary.​com/​Managing intergenerational nursing teams: evidence from the literature. The Free Library 01 2015. Accessed 10 May 2024.
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Melo R, Mónico L, Carvalho C, Parreira P. Leadership and its effects: Nursing leadership in healthcare organizations. 2017. Nursing School of Coimbra. Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing. ISBN 978-989-99426-6-0. Melo R, Mónico L, Carvalho C, Parreira P. Leadership and its effects: Nursing leadership in healthcare organizations. 2017. Nursing School of Coimbra. Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing. ISBN 978-989-99426-6-0.
Metadaten
Titel
Generational diversity in nursing practice environments – scoping review
verfasst von
Diana Sanches
Soraia Pereira
Susana Castro
Mariana Mendes
Eduardo Santos
Olga Ribeiro
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02607-3