Introduction
Nursing is a profession traditionally characterized by a predominance of female nurses [
1‐
4]. Data available from the World Health Organization (WHO) covering 104 countries, indicate that although the number of male nurses in the field has been increasing in recent years, men are still a minority group in nursing in most countries [
5]. In Europe and the Americas, the number of men in the nursing workforce remains relatively low (16% and 14% respectively), with values of 21%, 21%, and 19% in the Eastern Mediterranean, South-East Asia, and the Western Pacific respectively. In contrast, the proportion of male nurses in Africa is a relatively high 35% [
5].
Despite being in the minority, male nurses enjoy certain advantages [
1]. They are more likely to work full-time and have fewer career interruptions; they also appear to progress quickly to better-paid senior and nursing leadership positions [
4,
6,
7]. In addition, recent years have seen an increasing tendency of male nurses to pursue advanced nursing clinical training. According to the Canadian Nurses Association, the number of male nurse practitioners in Canada has steadily increased over the past decade, with a rise from 4.5% in 2010 to 8.3% in 2019 [
8]. Similarly, the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia reports that the proportion of male nurse practitioners in Australia has risen from 7.7% in 2015 to 10.3% in 2020 [
9]. In the United Kingdom, the percentage of male nurses with advanced training has remained relatively stable over the past decade, with 9.6% of nurse practitioners in 2011 being male and only a slight increase to 10.5% by 2020 [
10]. Based on data from the Israel Ministry of Health (IMoH), the 9% of licensed male nurses in the healthcare system in 2005 increased to 15% in 2021 [
11]. These figures indicate a modest but noteworthy increase in the representation of male nurses within the nursing workforce in Israel.
Given the growing gender representation within the nursing profession, where male nurses, despite being a minority, are increasingly pursuing advanced clinical training and assuming leadership roles, it becomes imperative to understand how these dynamics influence the scope of practice. This context sets the stage for the current study, which was designed to explore how gender may affect the utilization of nursing scope of practice in different healthcare settings, while focusing specifically on both genders in geriatric environments.
Methods
Study design
This was a cross-sectional, observational study, which complied with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (see Appendix A) that ensure transparent and complete reporting of observational studies.
Study population
A total of 286 registered nurses with advanced training (post-basic certification) in geriatric care, comprising 207 females (72.4%) and 79 males (27.6%), were included in the study.
Sampling and recruitment
This study was approved on August 30, 2021, by the Ethics Committee of the Jerusalem College of Technology, Lev Academic Center (N°21–013). Informed consent was obtained from all the nurses, who were instructed that participation in the survey was voluntary and could be terminated at any point during the study. The data were analyzed anonymously to maintain confidentiality.
Nurses were recruited to this study between September and December 2021 by convenience sampling. Using a random sample in a study minimizes bias and ensures an equal chance of selection, thereby enhancing the representativeness and generalizability of the results. This approach improves study validity and allows for more reliable, broadly applicable conclusions.
The recruitment process involved two discrete waves of email distribution. Messages describing the aim of the study and inviting nurses to participate were sent via email through the Nursing Division in the IMoH in two separate periods (September–October and November–December). Calls for participation were also broadcasted on pertinent professional social media platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp. Questionnaires were similarly disseminated by e-mail and social media. Reminders were sent periodically to ensure maximum participation and to address any queries potential respondents might have. Out of 350 nurses invited to participate in the study, 276 completed the questionnaire, resulting in a response rate of 81.7%.
The questionnaire was developed to measure the extent of nursing scope of practice in various elderly care settings and was based on items validated in a previous study [
18]. The questionnaire consisted of three parts: socio-demographic and occupational characteristics; assessment of the nursing scope of practice and performance; and the level of professional satisfaction. The questionnaire was self-administered using a structured format as described below.
Part I consists of eight items related to the nurse's socio-demographic and occupational characteristics, including age (years), sex (male/female), marital status (single/married/with significant other/divorced/widow(er)), experience in nursing and in geriatric care (continuous-years), seniority in the geriatric field (continuous-years), work setting (acute geriatric ward/geriatric long-term facility/community-care), academic degree (BA/MA/PhD), and religion (Jewish/Muslim/Christian).
Part II includes 25 items related to the nursing scope of practice and measures the performance of each procedure in different geriatric settings. The scope of nursing practice in Israel is in accordance with specific legislation, protocols, and health policies within The Public Health Regulations (Nursing Staff in Clinics) 1981 and the Public Health Regulations (Persons Practicing Nursing in Hospitals) 1988 [
33]. Following these guidelines, the nursing scope of practice was divided into two categories: activities authorized for all registered nurses and those recommended only for advanced post-basic certification graduates [
34].
Nurses were asked to indicate whether they had carried out each procedure by selecting “Yes = 1” or “No = 0”. If they responded “No” to any item, a structured checklist opened with options for the reasons for not carrying out the relevant activity, including “Not relevant to the workplace”, “Beyond my competence”, or “Lack of organizational support for fulfilling scope of practice”. The Cronbach's alpha on the Utilization of Scope of Practice scale score for the current study was 0.94, indicating high reliability. Scores ranged from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating a broader range of scope of practice performed by nurses in their respective work settings. This index procedure was established with the aim of providing a numerical value that can faithfully represent the relative change or magnitude of nursing qualifications. The integration of diverse data points or variables into a unified, standardized score facilitates the comparison of different sets of data and enables trends to be monitored over time. This approach consequently allows for a more meaningful and comprehensive assessment of nursing qualifications, thereby enhancing the accuracy and reliability of nursing-related analyses and evaluations. This variable was the dependent variable.
Part III comprises seven items that assess the level of professional satisfaction subsequent to the completion of post-basic certification education and within the scope of practice. Nurses were requested to rate their satisfaction levels on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The mean score represents the overall satisfaction level, with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction with both the completion of post-basic certification education and the scope of practice. The Cronbach's alpha of this section was 0.88, indicating good reliability.
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables are presented as frequencies with percentages. Univariate analyses performed to identify significant covariates included chi-square and two-sample t-test. Only the covariates found to be significant for utilization of scope of practice in the univariate analyses were included in the final multivariate analysis.
Six independent variables included in a multivariate linear regression model for the prediction of utilization of scope of practice were gender, age, holding a Master’s degree in nursing, working in long-care facilities, working in an acute geriatric ward, and experience in nursing. This approach allows for a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing nursing practices.
The significance of the model and the R2 were calculated. The level of significance was set at a p-value of 0.05, a standard threshold in the social sciences that equalizes the risk of type I and type II errors. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 28 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois) was used for all data analyses to ensure robust statistical processing.
Results
The study sample comprised 286 registered nurses with advanced post-basic certification.
This section presents the demographic and professional characteristics of the participants.
General characteristics of the study population (Table 1)
Table 1
General characteristics of the study population (Total n = 286), by gender
Age Categories (years) |
20–30 | 10 (12.7%) | 10 (4.8%) | χ2(3) = 19.254 |
31–40 | 39 (49.4%) | 61 (29.5%) | p < 0.001 |
41–50 | 17 (21.5%) | 70 (33.8%) | |
51 + | 13 (16.5%) | 66 (31.9%) | |
Marital status |
Single | 8 (10.1%) | 11 (5.3%) | χ2(5) = 4.319 |
Married | 66 (83.5%) | 174 (84.1%) | p = 0.505 |
With significant other | 2 (2.5%) | 4 (1.9%) | |
Divorced | 3 (3.8%) | 15 (7.2%) | |
Widowed | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (1.0%) | |
Geographic area of residence |
Central Area | 14 (17.7%) | 84 (40.6%) | χ2(3) = 31.455 |
Jerusalem Area | 5 (6.3%) | 15 (7.2%) | p < 0.001 |
North Area | 58 (73.4%) | 78 (37.7%) | |
South Area | 2 (2.5%) | 30 (14.5%) | |
Religion |
Jewish | 19 (24.1%) | 143 (69.1%) | χ2(2) = 59.067 |
Muslim | 47 (59.5%) | 41 (19.8%) | p < 0.001 |
Christian | 11 (13.9%) | 9 (4.3%) | |
Work setting | | | χ2(2) = 6.336 |
Acute geriatric wards | 33(41.8%) | 63(30.7%) | p = 0.042 |
Geriatric long-term facility | 38(48.1%) | 97(47.3%) | |
Community | 8 (10.1%) | 45 (22.0%) | |
Experience in nursing (years) |
≤ 10 | 32 (40.5%) | 45 (21.8%) | χ2(2) = 28.992 |
11–20 | 33 (41.7%) | 66 (31.9%) | p < 0.001 |
≥ 21 | 14 (17.8%) | 96 (46.4%) | |
Scope of employment |
Full- time position 90%−100% | 73 (92.4%) | 174 (84.1%) | χ2 (2) = 3.642, |
Part- time position 66%−90% | 3 (3.8%) | 21 (10.1%) | p = 0.162) |
Part -time position 25%−65% | 3 (3.8%) | 12 (5.8%) | |
The male nurses tended to be younger than their female counterparts. The majority of male nurses were Muslim (59.5%), with only 19.8% of female nurses sharing this religious affiliation. Female nurses dominated the Jewish healthcare population with 69.1% females, and 24.1% males. Christian populations were less represented, with 13.9% male nurses and 4.3% female nurses (p < 0.05).
The results indicate that both males and female nurses work in geriatric long-term facilities (48.1% and 47.3%, respectively). The chi-square test results revealed a significant association between gender and work setting [χ2(2) = 6.336, p = 0.042], which reflects possible gender-specific preferences or restrictions in the allocation of occupations in elderly care.
Regarding job satisfaction, the mean score of satisfaction (range 1–5) among male nurses was rated at 3.35 (SD = 1.00), while female nurses reported a slightly higher mean level of satisfaction of 3.42 (SD = 0.88). A two-sample t-test revealed no significant difference in the mean satisfaction scores between male and female nurses [t (284) = −0.525, p = 0.600].
Scope of nursing practice
The scope of nursing practice in healthcare settings has been reported to vary between male and female nurses. Table
2 presents our results of the implementation of the scope of nursing practice obtained by considering 16 activities authorized for all registered nurses (A) and 9 activities that are authorized only for nurses possessing an advanced post-basic certification (B). The final value was achieved by consolidating various data points or variables into a single, standardized score, ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 25, with a mean of 13.59. Our findings suggest that male nurses tend to implement a significantly wider scope of both basic and more advanced activities, than their female counterparts. The mean score of nursing index procedures was significantly higher (M = 15.54, SD = 5.56), t(284) = 3.814,
p < 0.001 for males compared to females (M = 12.84, SD = 5.30), t(284) = 3.814,
p < 0.001.
Table 2
Utilization of the scope of nursing practice, by gender
A. Activities authorized for all registered nurses |
List of Activities n (%) | Male Nurses n = 79 | Female Nurses n = 207 | Test |
1. Collect venous blood for routine tests (not including blood type and crossmatch testing) including in the patient’s home | 57 (72.2%) | 106 (51.2%) | χ2(1) = 10.233 p = 0.001 |
2. Bowel impaction | 57 (72.2%) | 136 (65.7%) | χ2(1) = 1.085 p = 0.298 |
3. Defibrillation using a semiautomatic device | 48 (60.8%) | 104 (50.2%) | χ2(1) = 2.540 p = 0.111 |
4. Discontinue central venous line | 34 (43.0%) | 84 (40.6%) | χ2(1) = 0.143 p = 0.706 |
5. Insert a feeding tube in an unconscious patient without a tube tracheostomy for drainage or feeding | 52 (65.8%) | 105 (50.7%) | χ2(1) = 5.264 p = 0.022 |
6. Start a peripheral venous infusion and administer fluids | 67 (84.8%) | 145 (70.0%) | χ2(1) = 6.496 p = 0.011 |
7. Blood transfusion by two registered nurses | 45 (57.0%) | 83 (40.1%) | χ2(1) = 6.578 p = 0.010 |
8. Decide about the provision of OTC drugs according to a list defined by the Medical Director | 65 (82.0%) | 183 (88.4%) | χ2(1) = 1.863 p = 0.172 |
9. Flush central vein catheter and alternative systems with heparin | 53 (67.1%) | 125 (70.2%) | χ2(1) = 1.093 p = 0.296 |
10. Blood draw from central vein catheter and intravenous replacement systems | 36 (45.6%) | 63 (30.4%) | χ2(1) = 5.787 p = 0.016 |
11. Decide to replace or return a damaged or removable gastrostomy tube and perform the operation | 50 (63.3%) | 101 (48.8%) | χ2(1) = 4.823 p = 0.028 |
12. Decide about initiating physical restriction or allow restriction for the purpose of providing medical treatment | 66 (83.5%) | 141 (68.1%) | χ2(1) = 6.808 p = 0.009 |
13. Decide whether to inject glucagon to a diabetic patient with severe and life-threatening hyperglycemia | 40 (50.6%) | 84 (40.6%) | χ2(1) = 2.353 p = 0.125 |
14. Return a tracheal cannula as a life-saving action, to a patient with a tracheostomy | 44 (55.7%) | 89 (43.0%) | χ2(1) = 3.708 p = 0.054 |
15. Provide guidance and written approval to allow a caregiver to perform actions sanctioned by the Director General of the Ministry of Health | 51 (64.9%) | 116 (56.0%) | χ2(1) = 1.708 p = 0.191 |
Decide to give or discontinue oxygen to a hospitalized adult patient using a low-flow system | 69 (87.3%) | 166 (80.2%) | χ2(1) = 1.994 p = 0.158 |
B. Activities authorized only for those with advanced post-basic certification |
List of Activities n (%) | Male Nurses n = 79 | Female Nurses n = 207 | Test |
1. Attach or disconnect a patient from a respirator to clear secretions | 45 (57.0%) | 90 (43.5%) | χ2(1) = 4.171 p = 0.041 |
2. Deep suction from the trachea | 56 (70.9%) | 114 (55.1%) | χ2(1) = 5.931 p = 0.015 |
3. Injection of drug in an emergency situation to a central vein catheter and intravenous intermittent systems | 35 (44.3%) | 38 (18.4%) | χ2(1) = 20.249 p = 0.000 |
4. Blood draw for typing and crossmatch testing, ordering blood and blood products, in accordance with the relevant health system rules | 24 (30.4%) | 36 (17.4%) | χ2(1) = 5.819 p = 0.016 |
5. Emergency intravenous (IV) administration of medication | 35 (44.3%) | 54 (26.1%) | χ2(1) = 8.852 p = 0.003 |
6. Wound care | 76 (96.2%) | 197 (95.2%) | χ2(1) = .141 p = 0.708 |
7. Decide to insert urinary catheter into bladder | 61 (77.2%) | 139 (67.1%) | χ2(1) = 2.755 p = 0.097 |
8. Decide to remove urinary catheter from bladder | 51 (64.6%) | 129 (62.3%) | χ2(1) = .123 p = 0.726 |
9. Adjust a respirator or withdrawal from a respirator, in accordance with the individual patient protocol | 11 (13.9%) | 29 (14.0%) | χ2(1) = .000 p = 0.985 |
Male nurses significantly outperformed female nurses in 8 of the 16 activities open to all authorized registered nurses (p < 0.005). These included collecting venous blood for routine tests (72.2% vs. 51.2% for males and females respectively), blood transfusion by two nurses (45.6.0% vs. 30.4%), inserting a feeding tube (65.8% vs. 50.7%), starting a peripheral venous infusion (84.8% vs. 70.0%), blood draw from a central vein catheter (45.6% vs. 30.4%), making the decision to replace/return a removable gastrostomy (63.3% vs. 48.8%), impose physical restrictions (83.5% vs. 68.1%), and replace a tracheal cannula (55.7% vs. 43.0%), among others. The superior performance of male nurses in technical procedures may be influenced by gender stereotypes that typically associate men with technical proficiency.
In contrast, female nurses were more likely than males to make decisions regarding the delivery of over-the-counter drugs according to a list defined by the Medical Director (88.4% vs. 82.0% respectively).
The results also revealed that male nurses executed 5 out of 9 activities authorized for advanced nurses with post-basic certification more often than their female counterparts. The relevant procedures were attaching and disconnecting a patient from a respirator to extract secretions (57.0% vs 43.5%), performing deep suction from the trachea (70.9% vs 55.1%), injecting drugs in emergency situations to a central vein catheter and intravenous intermittent systems (44.3% vs 18.4%), blood draw for typing and crossmatch testing (30.4% vs. 17.4%), and emergency intravenous (IV) administration of medication (44.3% vs 26.1%).
Interestingly, a significantly higher percentage of female than male nurses (79.4% vs 20.6%) reported that the main reason for not implementing certain activities, including emergency drug administration through central vein catheters and intravenous intermittent systems, heart defibrillation using semi-automatic devices, and prescribing OTC medication, was because the procedure was irrelevant to their specific healthcare setting. This difference was significant with [t(284) = −3.116, p = 0.002], indicating that females (M = 7.87) found this to be a more pertinent issue than males (M = 5.35).
Similarly, more female nurses perceived institutional policies as impeding their execution of nursing activities than did male nurses (67.8% and 32.2% respectively), although this difference was not significant [t(284) = 1.212, p = 0.226]. Lastly, a lack of support from medical directors was identified as a significant barrier to performance by both female nurses (66.6%) and male nurses (34.4%), with no significant gender differences detected [t(284) = 0.942, p = 0.347].
A multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted with the purpose of explaining the nursing scope of practice. In the first step, we conducted a three dummy variable (holding a Master’s degree in nursing, long-care facilities, acute geriatric ward) binary (yes/no) analysis in order to select relevant parameters for our model. Subsequently, six covariates found to be significant for utilization of scope of practice in the univariate analyses were then included in the final multivariate analysis.
The multivariate regression model was significant (
p < 0.001) and explained approximately 24% of the variance using index procedures (Table
3). Significant predictors included holding a Master’s degree in Nursing (β =
−0.185;
p = 0.004); working in long-care and acute geriatric facilities (β = 0.219;
p = 0.01; β =
0.385; p < 0.001; respectively
), extensive experience in nursing (β = −0.149;
p = 0.024), and satisfaction at work (β = 0.369;
p < 0.001). Interestingly, female gender was borderline significant and negatively associated with nursing scope of practice (β = −0.110;
p = 0.088).
Table 3
Regression coefficients from the multivariate linear regression model estimation of the utilization of index procedures (n = 286)
Gender-female | −1.328 | −0.110 | −0.235, 0.015 | 0.088 |
Holding a Master’s degree in Nursinga | −2.114 | −0.185 | 0.308, −0.061 | 0.004 |
Long-care facilitiesa | 2.453 | 0.219 | 0.044, 0.393 | 0.014 |
Acute geriatric warda | 4.317 | 0.385 | 0.208, 0.561 | < 0.001 |
Experience in Nursing (seniority)b | −0.500 | −0.149 | −0.278, −0.019 | 0.024 |
Satisfaction at workc | 2.221 | 0.369 | 0.241, 0.496 | < 0.001 |
Discussion
The aim of this study was to examine potential gender-related differences in the utilization of nursing scope of practice across various geriatric care settings (acute, long-term, and community care) for activities authorized for all registered nurses and those designated only for advanced post-basic certification graduates. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to investigate such associations among nurses working in various geriatric healthcare settings.
A significant finding in our study is that male nurses outperform their female colleagues in technical procedures such as taking venous blood for routine tests, inserting a feeding tube, and starting a peripheral venous infusion. In the absence of any other research that reports these findings, we hypothesize that this may be at least partly due to the observation that male nurses are more likely to be assigned tasks that require technical skills and expertise, which may be perceived as more traditionally masculine [
3,
26‐
29,
35,
36]. Moreover, a recent meta-synthesis study [
37] reported that male nurses in a predominantly female profession are aware of the challenges related to their visibility. The results underscore the impact of technical proficiency and the career aspirations of male nurses to establish their competence as professionals. The male nurses could be seen to exhibit goal-directed behaviors, such as adjusting their career trajectories, communication methods, and work ethics, while leveraging their technical skills. This adaptation is motivated, in part, by the necessity to address gender-based disparities in the workplace and enable efficient navigation in the nursing profession [
37].
Our study also reveals that female nurses are more frequently involved in making decisions about the administration of over-the-counter medications, according to protocols established by medical directors. This pattern indicates that female nurses may engage more extensively in patient education and counseling—roles that align with traditional perceptions of femininity such as nurturing and caretaking [
3,
27,
35]. These activities require strong communication skills and a patient-centered approach, qualities often stereotypically assigned to women. Our findings are therefore consistent with the broader literature, which highlights how gender stereotypes can influence professional roles within nursing. For instance, Smith et al. [
38] discuss the impact of social stigmas and gender stereotypes on male nurses, suggesting that these factors often channel men into more technical or physically demanding roles, while women are steered towards tasks involving greater patient interaction and care coordination. The tendency to align nurses with roles based on gendered expectations not only reinforces traditional gender roles but may also influence career development and opportunities within the nursing field. Thus, our observations contribute to the growing body of evidence that calls for a reevaluation of how nursing tasks are assigned and the potential for biases that may arise from entrenched gender norms.
In terms of activities authorized for advanced nurses with a post-basic certification, male nurses implemented five out of nine activities to a greater extent than their female counterparts. Despite the absence of comprehensive research in this area, we believe that the notable differences in the scope of practice between male and female nurses may be due to several factors. A compelling element could be the generational effect, where younger nurses, regardless of gender, have been exposed to more contemporary educational practices and regulatory changes in nursing. This modern training might equip them with different skills and approaches compared to their older counterparts, thereby influencing how they practice and what roles they assume within healthcare settings. Moreover, there may be effects of the initiatives and policies by the Israel Ministry of Health (IMoH) that focus on the development and utilization of nursing qualifications. In recent years, the IMoH has emphasized enhancing nursing competencies and has expanded the roles nurses can fulfill, which could contribute to the observed variations in practice scopes between male and female nurses. The targeted efforts to modernize and specialize nursing roles [
34,
39] might encourage a more diverse application of skills among newly trained nurses, and may affect how tasks are allocated and performed across gender lines. Furthermore, the higher proportion of male nurses working full time may have provided them with increased opportunities to gain experience and confidence in performing complex procedures.
There is a possibility that "men in nursing might find themselves being pushed towards specialties like emergency or trauma care, which are seen as more 'masculine' and require physical strength, as opposed to more 'feminine' areas like pediatric or geriatric nursing does exist [
37]. Specifically, a study in Taiwan by Yang et al. [
29] reported instances where "male nursing students were often expected by both peers and supervisors to perform and excel in technically demanding tasks, such as lifting heavy patients or managing emergency situations, which are often unjustly associated with male physicality. However, our results reveal that male nurses are frequently employed in acute and long-term geriatric care settings, which are areas requiring a diverse set of skills and competencies. This trend towards placing male nurses in environments that demand a broad skill set may help explain the observed gender differences in scope of practice. The specialization in areas that require a range of technical and critical thinking skills may afford male nurses more opportunities to develop and demonstrate their competencies, potentially leading to quicker career advancement. This observation aligns with findings from other studies across different cultural contexts. Research by Zhang & Tu [
40] in Asia and Smith et al. [
38] in Western countries similarly report that male nurses are often placed in roles that are perceived as more skill-intensive, contributing to the perception and reality of a broader scope of practice. Moreover, these studies suggest that male nurses often receive greater recognition from management, which not only fosters career advancement but may also influence the allocation of responsibilities that expand their scope of practice. This pattern of recognition and the subsequent opportunities it affords, appear consistent across various cultural backgrounds, indicating a potentially universal trend where gender influences professional roles and advancement in nursing.
The findings of our study reveal an interesting correlation: female nurses who hold a Master’s degree and have higher levels of seniority are less likely to perform certain index procedures. This pattern suggests that advanced education and a longer tenure in nursing may shift a nurse’s focus away from direct procedural tasks toward roles that emphasize leadership, research, or educational duties. Such roles often demand strategic thinking and managerial skills, potentially reducing the time and opportunity for these nurses to engage in hands-on clinical tasks [
41,
42]. This trend resonates with findings in broader nursing research, such as those reported by González-García et al. [
43], which indicate that nurses with higher academic qualifications often transition into roles that are less clinically intensive. These positions leverage their advanced knowledge and experience but may distance them from the front-line clinical activities typically associated with nursing. These may involve specific areas of nursing practice that do not involve the index procedures examined in our study. Such a transition can be viewed as a positive career progression; however, the trend also raises questions about the allocation of clinical responsibilities and the utilization of highly skilled staff in direct patient care.
These examples underscore how gender stereotypes not only shape professional roles but also influence expectations and task assignments within nursing. Such biases may hinder the professional growth and satisfaction of male and female nurses, and perpetuate gender disparities in the healthcare system.
It should be noted that we can perceive a shift toward more inclusive perceptions of the nursing profession in recent reports, suggesting a blurring of gender stereotypes in certain regions and institutions. A Q-methodological study by Kim, et al. [
44] in South Korea revealed an increasing acceptance of male nurses as competent healthcare providers. Similarly, an integrative review by Teresa-Morales et al. [
27], concluded that institutional policies promoting diversity and inclusion are crucial in diminishing gender biases and in fostering a culture that values all nurses irrespective of gender. Furthermore, a study in Saudi Arabia by Salvador & Alanazi, [
45] reported that newer healthcare institutions with international affiliations tend to be more progressive in combating traditional gender roles, creating environments where male nurses feel more accepted and valued.
Our findings validate previous research indicating a significant relationship between job satisfaction and the utilization of the full scope of nursing practice. As described by studies such as Han et al. [
46], Déry et al. [
47], and Wood et al. [
48], nurses who are content with their work environment and conditions, exhibit higher levels of motivation, engagement, and commitment to their roles. A satisfied nurse is more likely to show initiative, participate in decision-making, and perform complex procedures that require a high level of expertise, thereby effectively expanding their scope of practice. The positive association between working in long-term care and acute geriatric facilities and the utilization of index procedures may be attributed to the specific characteristics of the complex patients treated in these settings. The condition of patients in these facilities often involves a higher level of complexity and multiple comorbidities, requiring nurses to be more comprehensive in their approach and to perform a broader range of procedures within their scope of practice. This may include procedures related to specialized geriatric care, chronic disease management, rehabilitation, palliative care, and other aspects specific to the needs of elderly or long-term care residents. As a result, nurses working in long-term care and acute geriatric facilities may need to utilize their full scope of practice in order to satisfy the complex needs of the patient population they serve.
Overall, the results of our study emphasize that understanding gender-related differences in nursing practice is of utmost importance at the organizational, educational, and policymaker levels within healthcare institutions. At the organizational-clinical level, it is crucial to promote equal opportunities for male and female nurses so that they may engage in a diverse range of activities within their scope of practice. By recognizing and capitalizing on the strengths of both genders, healthcare institutions can foster more comprehensive and effective patient care while promoting gender equality in nursing practice. At the educational level, nursing programs need to ensure that curricula are designed to provide all students with comprehensive training and exposure to a broad range of activities regardless of gender. This includes providing them with diverse clinical experiences and opportunities that reflect the full scope of nursing practice. Educators should actively challenge gender stereotypes and biases within the classroom and clinical settings, with the aim of promoting an inclusive learning environment that encourages all students to explore and develop their skills across various specialties and practice areas. Furthermore, educational institutions can also support ongoing professional development programs that enable nurses to expand their scope of practice and acquire specialized skills in areas where disparities may exist.
Since policymakers play a vital role in shaping the nursing practice framework, they should collaborate with nursing associations and organizations to develop policies that explicitly address gender disparities in the scope of nursing practice. This could involve advocating for guidelines that promote equal distribution of tasks and responsibilities among nurses, regardless of their gender. Policymakers should also encourage research and data collection to monitor and track progress in addressing these disparities and use evidence-based findings to inform policy decisions. Acknowledging these initiatives, it is equally important to acknowledge the limitations of the current study, as they could influence how the findings are interpreted and their applicability to broader contexts.
Strengths and limitations
A strength of this study lies in its analysis of a sizable dataset involving male nurses (~ 30%), which enhances the robustness and representativeness of the findings. One limitation is that the data were collected by self-reporting, which introduces the possibility of recall or reporting biases among the participating nurses. This could potentially affect the accuracy and reliability of the reported information. Secondly, the study design was cross-sectional and utilized a convenience sample, which may introduce selection bias and limit the generalizability of the findings to a broader population of nurses. It is also important to note that there are additional dimensions related to the scope of nursing practice that were not explored in this study. Factors such as the type of healthcare organization, the time from completion of the post-basic certification, self-efficacy to perform specific activities, and the profile of patients requiring the treatment, can all influence the scope of nursing practice.
To address the limitations identified in this study and enhance the understanding of gender-related differences in nursing practice utilization, future research should consider longitudinal studies to track changes and establish causal relationships, as well as incorporate more diverse samples from various healthcare settings and locations. Including variables such as organizational culture, time since certification, and specific patient demographics could offer a deeper insight into the factors influencing nursing scope of practice. The implications of this research are substantial for health organizations, educators, and policymakers. Health organizations should develop interventions that promote task equity, while educators could integrate these findings into curricula to prepare nurses for a diverse and inclusive environment. Policymakers might use this evidence to advocate for standards that address gender disparities, enhancing healthcare quality. These steps will help translate research findings into practice. ensuring all nurses can fully utilize their skills, ultimately leading to a more equitable and effective healthcare system.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.