Introduction
As a science that focuses on human healthcare, nursing is committed to promoting health standards and making efforts to address the care needs of patients and the community [
1]. The nursing system in every country is the frontline of providing healthcare services [
2] and the commitment to the health of people and the community is one of its main duties [
3]. Educational systems are complex and consist of individuals, facilities, educational cultures, networks, institutions, identities, and relationships [
4]. Educational systems, nowadays, must be accountable to the needs of society [
5].
Social accountability is defined as the accountability of individuals, groups, or institutions to the members of a society or an organization by accepting the consequences and results of their responsibilities [
6]. Social accountability in the health system and the related disciplines, including nursing, is formed by rational policy-making and effective interventions in the fields of education, care, and research and continuous evaluation and promotion of community health [
7]. The system prepares graduates who want and are able to serve their community [
8].
According to the social accountability approach, the nursing discipline should be responsible for the quality of care it provides to the community and be able to address people’s care needs by adopting proper policies and strategies [
9]. In contrast, poor social accountability can reduce nurses’ scientific and practical ability with regard to the community’s care needs and negatively impact the quality of nursing services, the community’s attitude towards the nursing profession, and public satisfaction with its services [
7,
9]. This makes the health care system inaccessible for a large group of people [
10].
However, the Iranian nursing system is faced with challenges in terms of social accountability and accountable nursing such as the nursing shortage [
11], the gap between theory and practice, limited political influence of nurses, poor engagement in important organizational and national health policies, ignoring nurses’ capabilities in maintaining community health, and nurses limited presence in the community [
11‐
13]. Launching specialty disciplines in nursing master's programs, paying more attention to clinical services, and community-based nursing are among the important measures in the field of social accountability in the nursing profession [
13].
Social accountability, in the Iranian nursing system, is considered as a new paradigm in health and cultural change and it is necessary to be studied and understood further in various disciplines including nursing [
14]. However, despite the importance of the issue, social accountability in the field of nursing is ignored and there are ambiguities in this regard [
15]. The approaches to the nursing system’s social accountability and its different dimensions should be further studied by conducting more quantitative or qualitative research [
16,
17].
Among various research approaches, qualitative research can play an effective role in explaining complicated, ambiguous, and unknown areas of phenomena, and lead to the clarification of the why and how of the phenomena of which we have little knowledge [
18]. Therefore, this qualitative study was conducted using on an exploratory descriptive qualitative design using content analysis method in order to explore the challenges of the Iranian nursing education system to address community needs.
Method
Design
The study was based on an exploratory descriptive qualitative design using content analysis method [
19] between May 2020 and December 2021. Qualitative approaches have an explorative nature and enable researchers to explore the complexity of phenomena happening to the healthcare providers, policy-makers, and clients [
20].
Setting
The research environment included hospitals, nursing schools, centers, universities and faculties. Nursing programs in Iran include BSc, MSc, and PhD programs. In the master’s programs, students receive training on various disciplines including pediatrics, internal medicine and surgery, psychiatric nursing, community health, nursing management, rehabilitation nursing, military nursing, and ICU and NICU nursing. In the PhD program, the specialty is determined based on the dissertation topic. Currently, there are 80 state-run nursing schools and 84 nursing schools run by the Islamic Azad University (a Non-governmental university) nationwide training students in nursing bachelor's degree program. Among these schools, 45 (38 governmental and seven Azad University schools) offer Master's programs in addition to Bachelor's degree programs, and 21 (20 governmental and 1 Azad University schools) offer Bachelor's degree, Master's degree, and PhD degree programs. This study was conducted in 12 government colleges and institutions and one non-government institution in the north, center, west, north, southwest and south-central regions of Iran. The inclusion criteria were the age of nursing schools and presence of outstanding nursing professors. The selection was based on a snowball method.
Participants
The research population consisted of nurses, policymakers, board certified nurses, nursing education and clinical managers, and the faculty members of nursing schools (All participants held at least a Bachelor's degree in nursing). The final research participants consisted of 21 individuals, 11 of them were male and 10 were female (Table
1). All interviewees were members of the nursing community and had a nursing-related education, including 10 nursing professors, four senior and middle nursing managers of hospitals, and four graduates of different programs with clinical jobs. All of participants selected through purposive sampling. Moreover, three more participants were selected through snowball sampling, consisting of a nurse working in community-based centers, a nursing professor, and a nursing PhD student with experience in clinical practice. Finally, data saturation was achieved after the 21
th interview. At the end of each interview, the participants were asked to introduce other potential participants for further interviews. Maximum variation in the participants’ selection was taken into account so that the participants were selected from different institutions with diverse work history, experiences, and gender.
Table 1
Characteristics of participants in the research
P1 | Clinical Nurse | BSc in nursing | Female | 24 |
P2 | Clinical Nurse | BSc in nursing | Female | 17 |
P3 | Home care nurse | MSc in Medical surgical nursing | Male | 4 |
P4 | Nursing faculty member | MSc in community health nursing | Female | 11 |
P5 | Nursing faculty member | PhD in Nursing | Male | 23 |
P6 | Quality improvement office expert | MSc in Medical surgical nursing | Female | 19 |
P7 | Community oriented center | MSc in Medical surgical nursing | Female | 17 |
P8 | Nursing Manager | MSc in critical care nursing | Male | 16 |
P9 | Nursing Manager | MSc in Medical surgical nursing | Female | 24 |
P10 | Nursing Manager | MSc in Medical surgical nursing | Male | 20 |
P11 | Nursing faculty member | PhD in Nursing | Male | 28 |
P12 | Nursing faculty member | MSc in psychiatric Nursing | Male | 22 |
P13 | Nursing faculty member | MSc in nursing management | Male | 11 |
P14 | Nursing faculty member | PhD in Nursing | Male | 27 |
P15 | Nursing faculty member | PhD in Nursing | Female | 25 |
P16 | Nursing faculty member | PhD in Nursing | Female | 26 |
p17 | Nursing faculty member | MSc in community health nursing | Male | 18 |
P18 | Nursing faculty member | PhD in Nursing | Female | 19 |
P19 | Clinical Nurse | MSc in Medical surgical nursing | Male | 18 |
P20 | Nursing faculty member | PhD in Nursing | Male | 21 |
P21 | Nursing students ( PhD candidate) | MSc in Nursing | Female | 1.5 |
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria consisted of willingness to participate in the study, having knowledge of and experience in the topic under study, the ability to speak, and consent to participate in the interviews. In addition, the exclusion criteria consisted of withdrawal from the study or not allowing the researchers to record the conversations. neither of which happened during the case study.
Data collection
The data was mainly collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews using open-ended questions. At first, two sample interviews were conducted by the interviewer and reviewed by the research team who had sufficient skills in conducting qualitative research. The guide questions were modified based on the findings. These two interviews were not used in data analysis. The main interviews with the participants were conducted face to face to the convenience of the participants at their workplace. The interviews were conducted by a researcher (the first author) who had completed a full course of qualitative research and voice recorded with the consent of the participants. In addition, memoirs were written and notes were taken to record body language, including the tone of voice, pronunciation of words, laughter, and pauses of the participants. The mean duration of the interviews in each session was 50 to 70 min depending on the subjects’ tolerance. Two of the participants, one nursing professor and one senior nursing manager, participated in two interviews and other participants took part in only one interview. During the interview, guide questions were also used to facilitate data collection. At first, the interviewer would ask general questions and greet the interviewees as a warm-up, then start the interview with the main question “What is your opinion regarding social accountability and nursing education?” Then the interviews would be conducted based on the guide questions.
The guide questions:
-
1. How do you see the current nursing education system in Iranian universities? Can you share your experience?
-
2. How are community needs addressed in the nursing education system structure?
-
3. What are the problems of the current nursing education system to address community needs?
-
4. What is your opinion about the needs or the deficiencies of the nursing education system in addressing community needs?
During the interview, based on the participants’ answers, more open-ended questions were asked to clarify the details of their answers. If the participants started to speak freely, the researcher would direct the interview to further clarify the phenomenon under study by asking the probing question at the appropriate time. Furthermore, the guide questions were reviewed and approved by six researchers, four with PhDs in Nursing and two with PhDs in Medical Education.
Data analysis
In order to analyze the data, a qualitative approach was used based on Graneheim & Lundman qualitative content analysis method [
20]. The qualitative analysis was done with completion of each interview, i.e. after each interview, the collected data would be analyzed and then the second interview would be conducted. To analyze the interviews, the first author did the initial coding of the interview, then a three-member team, consisting of the first, second, and third authors summarized the analysis of each interview, and pointed out the shortcomings of the interview to the first author (the interviewer). All the interviews were analyzed in this way, and after the completion of the interviews, the preliminary classes and sub-classes were formed from the second interview onwards.
To analyze each interview, after jotting down the interviews, the texts were reviewed several times (immersion in data) to achieve a general perception of the different aspects of the experiences and the perspectives. The sentences were then converted into units of meaning as parts of sentences or paragraphs, and the initial codes were obtained using the words close to the participants’ statements. Finally, the codes were categorized based on the differences and the similarities. Then they were classified based on similar meanings and the connections and the consistency among them. Thus, the categories were placed together based on meaningful conceptual patterns. By realizing the connections in the data, the themes emerged. At this stage, MAXQDA software version 18 was used for data management.
Rigor
Credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transformability were assessed to approve the trustworthiness of the findings [
21].
To confirm the acceptability of the data, methods such as long-term involvement with the study and data and integration in the study such as maximum variation in the participant’s selection in terms of workplace, work experience, and gender were used. In addition, the research colleagues (peer check) and study participants (member check) checked the codes and classes.
To determine the reliability of the data, auditing method was used in this study. So that all research steps and details of the process, concepts, and results were clearly written. In addition, MAXQDA software V.18 was used to make sure that other researchers could follow and audit the data.
To determine the verifiability, the researcher tried to abandon her presuppositions about the desired phenomenon and the results (bracketing). In addition, the researcher tried to explain the different stages of the research and all the activities in detail so that other people can do an external audit of the subject by reading these writings.
To confirm the transferability in this study, the desired phenomenon was briefly examined and all the characteristics related to the cultural and contextual situations of the participants in the study were explained.
Discussion
An exploratory descriptive qualitative design using content analysis method was carried out to explore the challenges of the Iranian nursing education system in order to address the community needs.
In order to respond to the needs of the society, the Iranian nursing education system deals with two themes including system structure and educational process. In a similar study, an appropriate educational system structure including competent instructors and proper educational processes and design was considered as the foundation and the necessity of nursing education [
22]. Another study also referred to developing system structure and making changes tailored to community needs in educational processes as an important factor to reform nursing education in the future [
23]. Therefore, it can be said that educational system structure and processes are the main components of educational systems.
The results showed that the nursing curriculum should be regularly revised based on the community needs. One of the important categories was ignoring community needs in the nursing curriculum. The main requirements and needs in the nursing discipline are paying attention to community needs and providing services accordingly. Addressing community needs is one of the main priorities of nursing systems [
24,
25]. There is a need for a very systematic and continuous revision of the curriculum based on the present educational needs of the community [
26]. It can be inferred that as a result of the rapid growth of publishing papers in the field of nursing and medical sciences and the expansion of knowledge in this area [
8,
27] as well as the changing needs in community and expectations of nursing and medical services [
28,
29], it is necessary for the nursing discipline to continuously update the curriculum to keep it purposive.
Another important finding was the topic of qualified students. Being interested in nursing and having the potential abilities and talent is essential to enter this discipline. Some studies have stated that in order to succeed in this discipline, in addition to being interested and having potential abilities and talent, nurses should try to introduce their profession and its position to the public through enhancing their attitudes [
27,
30,
31]. In one of these studies, the researchers discovered that it was necessary to improve both students and nurses’ attitudes toward the values of nursing discipline [
31]. One of the important measures is to select interested and talented students with the potential ability to enter this field, and to make plans and take measures to improve their professional values and attitudes through in-service training, during the program and service.
A proportionate educational environment was another finding. The educational environment is one of the major requirements of the educational system, in terms of the presence of competent and committed faculty members, educational clinical wards proportionate to the number of the students, as well as community care centers. Moreover, it can be effective in making the education process accountable to the needs of the society. Universities should make plans to optimize the educational environment. Many studies have emphasized the importance of the educational environment, the evaluation of the situation, and the optimization of the learning environment in nursing education [
32‐
34]. The accreditation of educational environments and especially the qualitative and quantitative status of professors, the clinical and theoretical education environment and equipment, and educational processes is one of the appropriate ways to empower disciplines to address the community needs [
35]. It can be concluded that the educational environment consisting of human resources, clinical learning environments, and community-based care clinics is one of the requirements of education in the nursing system. The optimization of which is one of the most efficient measures to improve the Iranian nursing education system.
Given the continuous changes in the society’s needs in the health sector the Iranian nursing education system needs to be revised or even educationally redesigned to highlight the provision of theoretical and clinical education with an emphasis on the community needs and community-based care programs. Studies have shown that a community-based curriculum improves professional skills, communication skills, self-confidence, knowledge and awareness, critical thinking skills, and teamwork skills among nursing graduates [
25]. In another study, the authors showed that the community-based participatory educational programs had impacts on addressing the communication and participatory issues of nursing and midwifery students, and significantly improved their self-confidence and promoted their learning [
36]. To explain the results, it can be concluded that hospital and community-based clinical care centers play an important role in the education of nursing students. Therefore, it is necessary to include students’ presence in hospital and community clinical environments in the curriculum.
The results of the study also showed that monitoring and providing feedback in educational activities and the use of appropriate and standard educational evaluation methods in theoretical and clinical education were essential for nursing education and needed further improvement. Providing appropriate feedback to and purposive monitoring of students based on community-based curriculum can empower the students and make them feel responsible for the needs of the community [
37]. Currently, monitoring and evaluation in Iranian nursing schools is based on teacher-made exams and it is necessary to enhance evaluation in schools based on standard and advanced evaluation approaches [
38]. Thus, the use of mixed-method clinical-based evaluation approaches could be really useful in evaluating the clinical competence of nursing students [
39]. In explaining the results, it can be said that the current nursing education system needs to promote and improve evaluation approaches, especially in clinical practice. To this end, feedback should be provided in clinical and theoretical evaluations along with using novel and efficient evaluation approaches.
The nursing education system needs to improve the interaction with the community. More focus is needed on clinical services and community-based care, and early interaction with the community should be a priority in the education system. Various studies have also emphasized community-based clinical education [
8,
36] and having appropriate community interaction [
25]. It can be concluded that in order to address the community needs, it is necessary to make changes in the nursing curriculum in order to enhance students’ interaction with the community, especially in community-based care centers. In addition to hospital-based clinical training sessions, community-based health care nursing training are essential.
Strengths and limitations
One of the advantages of this study is adopting a qualitative approach in a real environment that provides a true representation of the process under study. Furthermore, conducting interviews with a wide variety of nursing professions, nursing professors, and students is noteworthy. Unfortunately, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the participants were not willing to be interviewed for nearly a year. Therefore, the interviews were conducted after a decline in coronavirus cases and, at times, when the city of Kermanshah was in better conditions. Sampling and conducting the interviews took more than one year due to the community conditions. The study was prolonged inevitably, due to the closure of facilities and universities, as well as the participants’ reluctance to conduct interviews. In addition, considering the limitations of quantitative studies and the need to describe the challenges in the Iranian nursing education system in a real environment, a qualitative method was used in this study. Therefore, given the ongoing changes in the educational system and the needs of the health sector in the society, similar studies are needed in the future.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.