Background
The term “Disease X” was first coined by the World Health Organization in 2018, and “Disease X” is not a disease, but a label that refers to the potential for a hypothetical, as yet unknown pathogen to cause a severe international pandemic. “X disease” has the characteristics of “high lethal, fast infection, easy mutation”, and there is great uncertainty in its occurrence and development. that millions of people had died after the outbreak of COVID-19. The social, economic and political shock is still reverberating. The COVID-19 is the first “X disease”,outbreaks of new pathogens and epidemics are only a matter of time, not whether they will occur.At the end of 2019, the WHO declared COVID-19, first discovered in Wuhan, China, as an international public health emergency.The rapid spread of COVID-19 has led to great challenges for both medical institutions and health care workers. In order to deal with the epidemic, the nursing work environment is rapidly adjusted: nurses are providing nursing services for patients with the strange disease, the proportion of personnel is unbalanced, the supply of personal protective equipment is limited, the difficulty of nursing is greatly increased, and weaken the emotional regulation ability of nursing staff [
1,
2].
As a clinical nurse, the researcher has participated in the front-line care of the epidemic.In the special working environment of the fight against the epidemic, researchers and other front-line nursing staff fighting against the epidemic have repeatedly experienced difficult decision-making or taking conservative decisions, insufficient physical endurance, weakened attention control and emotional regulation ability, anxiety and other conditions.According to the literature, this phenomenon belongs to the category of decision-making fatigue, and We learned that the complex working environment and psychological burden can easily lead to decision-making fatigue. Decision-making fatigue may have adverse effects on the psychological state of nurses, clinical decision-making and even the prognosis of patients [
3‐
8]. In order to improve the mental health status of nursing staff and provide safer care for patients, decision-making fatigue deserves in-depth research and exploration.
Decision fatigue is an emerging concept in the field of psychology, which refers to the impaired ability of decision-making and control behavior caused by repeated decision-making behavior. It is a fatigue state [
3] with impaired cognitive processing and emotional regulation ability. It is found that bad mood and cognitive burden are all important factors that cause or aggravate decision-making fatigue [
9]. Individuals who experience decision fatigue usually show a tendency to make impulsive or conservative decisions after weakening the ability to weigh the pros and cons, making the decision quality decline [
10,
11]. Several studies have shown that decision fatigue is common among caregivers at work [
12,
13].
This study focuses on the decision-making fatigue experience of front-line nurses in the context of public health emergencies (COVID-19), aiming to explore the cognition and attitude of decision-making fatigue and the feelings and influence of decision-making fatigue. It provides a basis for formulating coping strategies in the face of public health emergencies improve the quality of clinical nursing and empower clinical nursing management.
Method
Design
Interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) [
14] guided the design and development of this study.Interpretive phenomenology was founded by J. A. Smith on the basis of phenomenology and other theories. Phenomenology, hermeneutics and specific orientation are the three important ideological sources of interpretive phenomenology [
15,
16].To explore the cognition, attitude, influence, feeling and factors of decision fatigue from the perspective of front-line nurses.This study was carried out under the guidance of the Qualitative Research Reporting Standard (SRQR) [
17] and the IPA quality evaluation standard proposed by Smith to ensure the quality and rigor of the research [
16].
Setting and sample
The particular approach of interpretative phenomenology requires that studies focus on smaller, more homogeneous samples [
14]. This study adopts homogenous samples to select a group of cases with relatively similar internal components for research, aiming to conduct in-depth discussion and analysis of cases with similar experience in the research phenomenon, so as to obtain the experience of homogenous samples. The main recruitment channels for respondents were multiple wechat groups of “treatment and nursing medical teams”, and a small number of subjects were recruited by phone, mail and face to face. The interviewees were recruited and studied from November 2022 to February 2023. We selected research subjects in the same region and during the same period of the epidemic of the new coronavirus. The subjects were trained according to the same version of the “Epidemic Prevention and Control Guidelines” of Jilin Province and carried out anti-epidemic work. The research team believed that the internal components of the research subjects were similar.Interpretive phenomenology holds that data collection and analysis can stop when the findings can be presented as a persuasive and coherent narrative [
18]. In this study, after interviewing and analyzing the data of the 14th front-line nurse, the research team agreed that the extracted content had reached the purpose of this study and could be presented as a persuasive and coherent narrative, and the data collection and analysis was stopped.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: ① Registered nurses working in clinical practice;②Nurses who were participating in the front-line clinical work of COVID-19 in the designated treatment unit at the time of their participation in this study;③ Nurses with decision fatigue were identified after scoring with Decision Fatigue Scale (Chinese version) ; ④Voluntarily signing of an informed consent and voluntary participation in this study; ⑤Nurses who could afford to spend 1–2 h of continuous time to be interviewed.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: ① Nurses who were not in direct contact with the COVID-19, such as nursing managers and other support (logistics) positions.
Data collection
According to the Chinese version of Decision Fatigue Scale [
19] and relevant literature, the preliminary interview guidelines outline was formulated in combination with the research purpose and the opinions of experts in this field. Before the formal interview, two interviewees were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and pre-interviews were conducted for these two front-line nurses. Two pre-interviews ensured clarity of questions and robustness of interview design. The data from the pre-interview are not included in the thematic analysis, but are helpful to ① revise the content of the interview outline; ② Ensure the interviewees’ comfort level with sensitive topics; ③ Confirm that the interview time of 45–90 min is reasonable [
20].According to the pre-interviews results, the research team met face-to-face to discuss and revise the interview guidelines outline to determine the final interview guidelines outline. Before the formal interview, first explain the purpose, content and format of the interview to the interviewee. Ask the front-line nurses whether they know the concept of decision fatigue, explain the definition of decision fatigue to the interviewees according to their understanding, and list the actual cases of decision fatigue. To achieve a clear definition of decision fatigue. The interviewees were asked about their wishes, signed the informed consent after obtaining the informed consent, and filled in the general information questionnaire for the interviewees. Number the interviewees according to the order of interview, conceal their real names, and privacy of the interviewees.The interviewee has the right to withdraw or refuse to answer questions at any time during the interview. Relevant information about the environment or interviewees’ tone, pauses, etc. observed in the field records are recorded in the form of field notes. An interview ends when both the researcher and the interviewee confirm that nothing new needs to be mentioned. Each interviewee was interviewed only once. Each interview lasted 45–90 min, and all interviews were conducted by the same investigator with no third person present during the interview.
Because the COVID-19 can spread through the respiratory tract. Therefore, out of a total of 14 interviewees, only two interviewees were interviewed face-to-face, respectively in the office area of the designated treatment unit (enclosed space without a third person present) and the apartment of the front-line nurses (enclosed space without a third person present). Face-to-face interviews can more directly observe the body language of the interviewees. By using the video call function of wechat to complete the interview with five interviewees, we can also observe the body language of the interviewees. Meanwhile, our research finds that it is easier to capture the inner world of the interviewees when using the video call function of wechat to complete the interview than face-to-face interview. Seven interviewees were interviewed by telephone. Although they could not observe their body language, they could also record their voice, intonation, mood fluctuations and other expressions.
In the process of inviting research subjects, Two front-line nurses declined to participate in the study. One front-line nurse did not specify the reason for the refusal, and the other refused because of concerns about the leakage of personal information.A total of 14 front-line nurses were interviewed, each of whom was interviewed once, and no repeated interviews were conducted.
Data analysis
The data were analysed using IPA. IPA is an ideographic approach that seeks to obtain an understanding of the lived experiences of individuals by exploring their unique meaning-making and the meanings they ascribe to particular phenomena. Smith argues that, as humans, we have always been engaged in interpretative meaning-making. Interpretation is the basic structure of our intentional lives, and is therefore not only acceptable, but inevitable. Since the IPA sees the primary role of the researcher as an invitation to the participant to share his construction of meaning, to witness its expression, and thus to understand it, this aligns the IPA with Heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology [
15,
16,
21].
In this study, IPA was used to obtain an in-depth understanding of the experiences with decision fatigue reported by front-line nurses working in clinical response efforts in the context of COVID-19. The six-step IPA method introduced by Smith was used for data analysis. The specific steps of this analytical method are as follows:
Step 1: The interview transcripts are read repeatedly. The recordings of the interview are listened to repeatedly. Then, the interviews are transcribed and sent to the interviewed nurses to verify their accuracy. Throughout research process, the researchers record their observations and ideas at any time in the form of field notes and memos.
Step 2: Preliminary annotation and analysis. Initial coding was conducted independently by the investigator himself and under the guidance of the supervisor (research team leader). The discussion process is not designed to convince each other, but to make a comprehensive and thorough analysis of the nature of the phenomenon, to ensure that the final decision made can explore the nature of the phenomenon at a deeper level.
Step 3: Generate themes, pooling similar codes into subthemes, and the research team meets to discuss the subthemes.
Step 4: Determine the correlation between the subthemes, form the theme, and the research team meets to discuss and determine the theme.
Step 5: Proceed to the next case analysis. After a new interview, repeat the first four analysis steps to develop the previous hypercoordinated theme by extracting new data or a new theme.
Step 6: Search for searched in crossover cases, and the research team met to discuss the analysis results until all topics were endorsed to ensure accurate and comprehensive analysis results. However, this step is not the last step in the data analysis process, and the analysis continues even when the results are recorded.
Rigor
The data was supplemented and repeatedly confirmed by the interview recording, field notes and memos to maximize the data. In the process of interpretation and analysis of data, the circular principle of interpretative phenomenology is applied, and self-reflection and criticism are constantly carried out in order to achieve the deepest level of interpretation.
Research team members have deep learning qualitative research, and the research team leader has rich experience in qualitative research. The study process and results were carefully reviewed by an expert in the field of qualitative research who was not a member of the study team and followed that expert’s recommendations. The coding was done independently by the investigator himself, and the research team met in regular meetings to ensure that the analysis achieved the study objectives.
This study was reported in accordance with the Qualitative Research Reporting Standard (SRQR) checklist. Meanwhile, Smith developed quality evaluation guidelines for IPA research in 2011 [
16]. It is pointed out that qualified IPA research should meet the following four criteria:①Clearly indicate that the research follows the three theoretical principles of IPA (phenomenology, hermeneutics and specific orientation); ② The research process is clear and transparent, including how to select research objects, how to conduct interviews and analysis processes; ③ Clear and reasonable; ④ There is sufficient evidence to support each topic. This study follows the above four criteria to ensure the rigor of this study.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee (2,022,110,308). In this study, all methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants signed informed consent forms and volunteered to participate in the study, and they could withdraw from the study at any time. All participants were promised that their information would be kept confidential, and no participants dropped out of the study. To ensure the confidentiality of the participants’ information, the participants were coded according to the order of the interviews, with a numerical code identifying participant categories and the order in which they were interviewed. Access to the recordings and other related materials was restricted to members of the research team stored only on the first author’s computer in the form of encrypted files.
Discussion
The rapid spread of COVID-19 has led to an unprecedented global public health crisis, and medical institutions and medical workers are facing great challenges. This study deeply explored the cognition, attitude, feeling and influence of decision fatigue among frontline nurses in the context of public health emergencies, and confirmed once again that decision fatigue is widespread among front-line nurses in the response to the epidemic, effectively affecting the physiological and psychological status of nurses, the quality of nursing work, and even the outcome of patients. Therefore, decision fatigue deserves the attention of medical institutions, nursing managers and front-line nurses. Appropriate strategies can be formulated according to the practical experience of decision fatigue of front-line nurses, and intervention can be carried out from the aspects of personnel, tasks, tools and technology, organization and environment.
During the period of COVID-19, a large number of studies have shown that the psychological pressure of front-line nurses against the epidemic is greater, and the anxiety score is significantly increased. However, our study found that interviews, on the one hand, improved participants’ cognition of the concept of decision fatigue, and on the other hand, alleviated the anxiety of front-line nurses.
During COVID-19, our research found that preferential promotion, financial subsidies and family support from medical institutions or superior leaders can effectively improve the work enthusiasm of front-line nursing staff and alleviate decision fatigue.
Cognition, influence and attitude of decision fatigue
Decision fatigue is still in the initial stage of development in China. In the course of this study, it was found that although front-line nurses did not understand the concept of decision fatigue, after the explanation of the researchers, nurses all said that decision fatigue was widespread in front-line nursing work against the epidemic, This is consistent with the findings of Ann et al. [
22].The occurrence of decision fatigue is closely related to the special background of public health emergencies. In the future, we should strengthen the popularization of the concept of decision fatigue, enhance the cognition degree of nursing staff to decision fatigue, identify the signs of decision fatigue as soon as possible, deeply understand the impact of decision fatigue, and correct improper behavior in time. At the same time, we should strengthen the research on decision fatigue, broaden the research field, and explore the effective measures to avoid decision fatigue in many aspects and levels, so as to reduce the influence of decision fatigue to the greatest extent.
Interviewees showed different attitudes towards decision fatigue. Decision fatigue did not have a negative effect on some nurses, and the nurses maintained a neutral attitude towards it. Front-line nurses are more likely to suffer from decision fatigue in tasks that they think are relatively unimportant or do not directly affect the clinical outcome of patients. It is necessary to strengthen the training and interpretation of the basis or significance of the relevant work, which can avoid the occurrence of decision fatigue to a certain extent.
A number of interviewees also said that decision fatigue would have a certain negative impact on them after the occurrence of decision fatigue, leading to psychological distress of the respondents, weakening the sense of self-worth, increasing the psychological burden, affecting the quality of care, and even affecting the clinical outcome of patients. Therefore, they believe that decision fatigue deserves early intervention and intervention. Nursing staff should make timely self-adjustment to relieve multiple pressures, and nursing managers should also pay timely attention to the psychological status of front-line nurses, increase in-depth communication, detect problems in time, and intervene as soon as possible.
Approaching factors of decision fatigue
This study found that self depletion and others negative energy; High-load, high-difficulty tasks; A caged bird lacking experience or tools; An imperfect system; The internal environment constraint are the approaching factor of decision fatigue.
Personnel: emotional regulation, physical endurance, mental resilience, interpersonal interaction, and negative energy transmission can accelerate the occurrence of decision fatigue among front-line nurses, This is consistent with the findings of Hatami et al. [
23,
24].The support time is too long, the risk of self-infection is increased, and the nursing needs of patients are multiple aggravating emotional exhaustion; Self-reinforcing trapped in a captive image; The tightness of protective equipment, the alternation of cold and hot ambient temperature, and the inability to supply energy at any time lead to physical exhaustion; Continuous self-regulation to build mental resilience; Temporary establishment of support team, different departments and different experience personnel combination; Older people, mood swings and other difficult to communicate; The propagation of negative emotions and energy both accelerate the nurses’ self-depletion and eventually lead to the occurrence of decision fatigue. Decision fatigue generally exists in the work of clinical nurses, which can lead to the tendency of passive, avoidant and impulsive decision making. Ego depletion is associated with the depletion of self-control resources triggered by emotional regulation and cognitive function. The occurrence of decision fatigue will affect nurses’ reasoning and decision-making ability, leading to the reduction of decision-making quality. Nursing staff need to maintain a certain concentration to complete the observation work, and the cognitive impact caused by decision fatigue should be paid attention to. Therefore, attention should be paid to the psychological state of front-line nurses in clinical response to the epidemic, and phased training and psychological counseling should be done to ensure timely and effective communication between nursing managers and front-line nurses. Nurses should also timely adjust their psychological and physiological states and pay attention to the positive effects of adequate sleep, abundant physical strength, interval rest and glucose supplement. In the future, appropriate measures should be taken to reduce the self-depletion of front-line nurses against the epidemic, and team training should be emphasized to prevent the spread of negative emotions caused by the negative energy of others and thus the occurrence of decision fatigue.
Tasks: Large patient flow, limited staffing, lack of supervision, supporting staff or inadequate infrastructure will increase the tasks of front-line healthcare workers. The amount of multiple tasks will lead to multiple decisions, which will damage the quality of decisions, increase the work pressure, and further aggravate the occurrence of decision fatigue. Overload workload and difficult work are important factors that cause decision fatigue. The ratio of nurse to patient should be appropriate, and the position setting of nursing staff should consider multiple factors such as post competence, work load and work difficulty. At the same time, the front-line work of anti-epidemic needs to maintain sufficient physical strength. Many nurses mentioned that four hours is the limit of continuous working time wearing protective equipment, and the psychological and physiological state will be seriously decreased after four hours. The longer a nurse works continuously, the more decisions they make and the more conservative their decisions tend to be, and strategically scheduling (frequent, short) breaks is the best way to ensure that decisions remain efficient throughout the shift.
Tools and technology: nurses lack experience in front-line nursing work against the epidemic, and young nurses are not skilled in nursing operation skills and lack emotional regulation ability, which makes them more prone to decision-making fatigue. On the other hand, the lack of materials such as turning pads and information equipment has increased the amount of tasks and the difficulty of work. In addition, the protective clothing is airtight, which brings great discomfort to the front-line nursing staff, increases physical exertion, and accelerates the occurrence of decision fatigue. Therefore, it is necessary to regularly organize experience sharing meetings for front-line nursing staff to enrich front-line work experience, and pay attention to personnel matching based on work experience and post competence. Ensure the supply of tools for front-line work against the epidemic, and strengthen the applicability of nursing tools. Attention should be paid to the wearing standards of protective equipment to ensure the comfort of front-line personnel to the greatest extent.
Organizational aspects: overload workload, tasks that do not match nurses’ nursing experience and post competence, and work processes that are not adjusted in time aggravate the occurrence of decision fatigue. Medical institutions and nursing managers should timely adjust the work flow with the deepening of the understanding of the disease, and at the same time should do a good job of interpretation when issuing the relevant work flow and system, to ensure that front-line nurses are clear about the basis and significance of the formulation of a certain job, and avoid unnecessary work to increase the burden of nurses. According to the nurses’ work experience and post competence, the management should be strengthened, the tasks should be allocated reasonably, and the staff should be matched reasonably. At the same time, in principle, dual-income medical and health workers with elderly people and children will not be arranged to work on the front-line of the epidemic.
Environmental aspects: A poor work environment can make decision makers vulnerable to additional stress, which weakens their decision-making ability and leads to decision fatigue. Public health emergencies are often accompanied by rapid changes in the environment, so we should pay attention to the appropriate temperature and humidity, and try to avoid the loss of front-line nurses brought by the environment to fight the epidemic. In addition, pay attention to the nutrition supply and physical supplement of front-line nursing staff, adequate sleep and appropriate glucose supplement can effectively alleviate the occurrence of decision fatigue.
Avoidant factors of decision fatigue
This study found that external environment regulation (macro-policy regulation and care from medical institutions) is the circumvention factor of decision fatigue. Many interviewees said that the government and medical institutions’ policy support and care for front-line nursing staff and families have solved the worries of front-line nurses, reduced the psychological burden, improved the enthusiasm of work, and also avoided the occurrence of decision fatigue to a certain extent. Pay attention to the humanistic care of front-line nurses to reduce the psychological burden. We can appropriately increase the performance tilt support, priority employment, exception application, and title tilt policies. After the end of the front-line work, people can take concentrated rest, rest at home and paid leave in accordance with the requirements of epidemic prevention and control.
Suggestion and enlightenment
The outbreak and global epidemic of COVID-19, the first “X disease”, have made all regions of the world face a situation of strained medical resources, shortage of medical personnel and difficult nursing environment. Nurses are generally faced with heavy physical and psychological burdens, and the incidence of decision-making fatigue has increased significantly. This study identified the approaching and avoiding factors of decision fatigue, and provided a basis for formulating corresponding strategies for other public health events such as “X disease” that may occur in the future.
Nursing managers and front-line nursing staff should pay attention to the problem of decision fatigue and understand the potential harm of decision fatigue. On the premise of not affecting the safety of patients, psychological intervention measures such as interrupting continuous working hours, taking a short rest, carrying out relaxation training and mindfulness therapy can alleviate the occurrence of decision fatigue.
Setting up the energy supply area and appropriately placing the food or drink supplied with sugar can alleviate the occurrence of decision fatigue by inhibiting physical exertion.
The purpose of reducing decision fatigue is to improve work efficiency by means of information technology. Decision support system and electronic nursing records can effectively improve decision fatigue by avoiding decision errors caused by repeated decisions.Actively shape and enhance the nurse’s personal sense of accomplishment, while ensuring a certain benefit package to cope with a variety of emergency medical decisions and changing work environment.
Limitations
This study is a qualitative study, the participants are a single country, a single region, a single culture sample, the research results may have some regional differences. The COVID-19 lasted for three years, and front-line nurses had certain changes in their knowledge of the virus and their work mentality. The interview time of this study was in the middle and late period of the COVID-19, which ensured the homogeneity of samples to a certain extent, but the research results could not cover the overall period of COVID-19. In addition, the nuances within the group of participants suggest that each participant is following his or her own spiritual path, which makes thematic analysis somewhat challenging.
Conclusions
This study conducted a qualitative study on the decision fatigue experience of front-line nurses in the context of public health emergency (COVID-19). This paper analyzes and summarizes the cognition, influence, attitude approaching factors and avoidance factors of decision fatigue. It fills a gap in relevant research fields and provides a basis for developing response strategies to public health emergencies such as “Disease X”.
This study confirmed that decision fatigue is widespread in front-line nurses’ work against the epidemic, and affects the physical and psychological health of nurses, the quality of nursing work, the degree of benefit of patients and the clinical outcome. However, nursing staff do not know enough about decision fatigue, so the popularization and research of decision fatigue should be strengthened, and medical institutions, nursing managers and nursing staff should pay more attention to it.
By exploring the cognition, attitude, feeling and influence of front-line nurses on decision fatigue, this study analyzed the approaching and avoiding factors of decision fatigue. Some suggestions are put forward for the intervention of decision fatigue through personnel, task, tool and technology, organization and environment.At the same time, we suggest that: ① Nursing managers and front-line nursing staff should face up to and pay attention to the problem of decision fatigue and understand the potential harm of decision fatigue. On the premise of not affecting the safety of patients, psychological intervention measures such as interrupting continuous working hours, taking a short rest, carrying out relaxation training and mindfulness therapy can alleviate the occurrence of decision fatigue. ②Setting the energy supply area and appropriately placing the food or drink supplied by sugar can alleviate the occurrence of decision fatigue by inhibiting physical exertion. ③ Improve work efficiency by means of information technology to achieve the purpose of reducing decision fatigue. Decision support system and electronic nursing records can effectively improve decision fatigue by avoiding decision errors caused by repeated decisions.④ Actively shape and enhance the personal sense of accomplishment of nurses, while ensuring certain welfare benefits to cope with a variety of emergency medical decisions and the changing work environment.
It is hoped that the results of this study can be combined with quantitative research in the future to verify the effectiveness of intervention measures and effectively alleviate the degree of decision fatigue of front-line nurses.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.