Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Research

Criminal responsibilities of nurses in Turkish criminal law and determining the awareness levels of senior nursing students regarding this responsibility

verfasst von: Müjgan Solak, Nebahat Kayaer

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Background

It is noteworthy that there is an increase in medical lawsuits filed against nurses in Turkey and in the rest of the world. The purpose of this article is to examine nurses’ criminal liability and senior nursing students’ awareness of these responsibilities.

Methods

All senior students (n = 309) of the Faculty of Nursing who were studying in the 2020–2021 academic year of the university constituted the population of the research. The study was completed with 300 students who were studying between the dates of the research and who agreed to participate in the research. Data was collected online via Google Forms. The data obtained from the research was analyzed with the program SPSS 20. Numbers and percentages, averages, and chi-square tests were used to evaluate the data.

Results

This article provides an overview of nurses’ criminal liability and senior nursing students’ awareness of these responsibilities. The article offers striking implications regarding the awareness of trainee nurses who have not yet started their careers regarding the criminal liability of nurses.

Conclusion

The result of our research clearly revealed that the majority of senior nursing students have insufficient knowledge about professional criminal responsibilities, that they are not aware of their duties, powers, and criminal responsibilities as defined in legislation, and that they do not know the types of criminal responsibilities.
Hinweise

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

It is of vital importance for senior nursing students for their professional lives that they know their rights, authorities, and criminal responsibilities arising from professional faults as defined in the laws and regulations relating to their profession. Nurses must know the legal regulations governing the authorities and responsibilities required by their profession, and they must carry out their professional practices within this framework. However, the majority of nurses do not know the laws and regulations regarding them [1]. However, in practice, a lawsuit can be filed against nurses on the grounds that they have violated the relevant legislation and the principles and rules of medical science while performing their duties. This situation negatively affects the professional life of nurses.
In this article, we would like to draw attention to the current lack of knowledge of senior nursing students with the data we obtained. For this purpose, some brief information about the criminal liability of nurses will first be given in this article, and then our conclusions will be set out in line with the data we obtained as a result of the research.

Criminal liability of nurses in Turkish criminal law

A. in general

There is an increase in criminal and compensation cases filed against medical malpractice in Turkey [2, 3]. The number of malpractice cases submitted to the judiciary, especially due to the faulty professional practices of nurses, is undeniably high, and nurses rank second in terms of lawsuits filed against healthcare workers [46]. The subjects of lawsuits filed against nurses alleging medical malpractice are generally the crime of negligent injury and standard nursing care errors (medical error). In the studies conducted, the most common types of medical errors made by nurses were stated to be inadequate follow-up, incorrect treatment, negligence, imprudence, and lack of attention and care [7]. In one study conducted on this subject, it was stated that 21% of patient complaints were about nurses, although they did not all result in a lawsuit [8]. Likewise, in American and European countries, death and injury cases due to medical errors rank third among death and injury cases due to other causes [9]. Concerning medical malpractice lawsuits in Turkey, it was reported at a meeting of the Turkish Grand National Assembly Health, Family, Labor and Social Affairs Commission on March 22, 2022 that 5933 judicial lawsuits were filed between 2012 and 2022, and 517 of these cases were filed against nurses [10].
When situations that might lead to the criminal liability of healthcare professionals in some other countries were examined, the following results were reached. In Sweden, medical malpractice includes documentation and medication errors [11, 12]. In Finland, malpractice approaches are different from other countries: in the event that healthcare personnel realize their mistakes, no charges are brought against them and no lawsuits are filed. There is an insurance system based on no-fault liability for malpractice by health personnel [12]. In the United States of America (USA), deaths due to medical errors are reported to be the fifth leading cause of death [13, 14].
According to a report published in the US, 1.14 million (3.08%) patient safety violations were detected in 37 million hospitalizations between 2000 and 2002 in patients in the Medicare population. Rescue errors, bedsores and post-operative sepsis accounted for 60% of these events [15]. The American Nurses Association (ANA) states that errors caused by nurses are generally related to nurse incompetence, and errors will increase if nurses are in work environments where they are stressed, tired, and unable to think appropriately [14, 16]. Japan’s legal arrangements for dealing with deaths and injuries that occur in the provision of health services are mostly based on public law institutions and rules [14].

B. liability of nurses

Nurses are involved in all processes aimed at protecting and improving the health of the individual, family, and society, and healing in case of illness [1, 17]. Nurses play an important role at every moment of the treatment, from simple injections in the emergency room to severe surgical interventions [18]. According to the relevant legislation, nurses can both make their own decisions to provide medical intervention and play an active role in decisions to be taken regarding the care of the individual.
The legal basis of nurses’ duties, authority, and criminal liability is the Constitution of the Republic of Turkey (OG:09.11.1982/17863), the Turkish Penal Code (OG: 12.https://​doi.​org/​10.​2004/​25611), Nursing Law (OG: 02.03.1954/8647), Nursing Regulation (OG: 08.03.2010/27515), Patient Rights Regulation (PRR-OG:01.08.1998/23420), Inpatient Treatment Institutions Operation Regulation (OG: 13.01.1983/7927) and the Law on the Proper Performance of Medicine and Medical Arts (OG: 14.04.1928/863).
Nurses have certain duties, authorities, and responsibilities when performing their profession [19]. The duties and authorities of nurses are of three types: independent, semi-dependent, and dependent [1, 17]. In the Nursing Law, there are initiatives that nurses can perform independently, that is, they are authorized. They can act independently in such interventions. Nurses do not plan treatment, but they have the authority to apply the treatment ordered by the physician, which is within their dependent authority. Nurses have duties specified in laws and regulations, as well as various duties determined by the health centers where they work. In practice, the duty of the nurse is determined according to the relevant law and regulation and the nature of the concrete situation. However, sometimes there may be uncertainty in the legislation about the limits of nurses’ duties and authority [20]. Therefore, if there is no clear provision in the legislation regarding which medical intervention falls within the nurse’s field of duty, this is determined according to the core education he/she receives [21].
Incomplete or incorrect medical intervention by nurses, failure to perform their duties on time, failure to fulfill their duties towards the individual, or committing criminal acts while performing their duties may be infringements of their legal responsibilities [20, 22]. Nurses have three different responsibilities relating to unlawful actions while on duty. These concern criminal liability, administrative liability, and civil liability [18, 20, 21]. Administrative liability is there sponsibility imposed by the administration due to the actions it performs or the procedures it establishes. In other words, the responsibility of the administration is to compensate for the damage caused to people by the administration’s proceedings and actions. Legal (compensation)liability is the obligation to make a person who harms another person through a faulty and unlawful act pay for the damage.

C. criminal liability of nurses

Criminal liability of nurses is a type of liability that arises as a result of medical intervention or other positive or negative behavior related to their field of duty, in accordance with the type in the criminal law and against the law [20]. In other words, the criminal liability of nurses refers to the fact that if an unlawful act as defined by criminal law occurs, they will be tried for the crime corresponding to the action and sentenced to imprisonment or a fine [23, 24]. For example, if nurses cause death or injury to a patient through an intentional or negligent act (such as negligence, or imprudence), they will be criminally liable. It should also be emphasized that the liability of nurses arising from their unlawful actions is subject to the general liability principles of Turkish Law. Therefore, there are no specific liability rules or laws for the nursing profession. Thus, the same provisions will apply to organ loss resulting from a nurse’s faulty medical intervention as to organ loss resulting from a traffic accident (TPC Article 89).
Medical intervention is defined as a “ kind of activity that includes diagnosis, treatment, simple or severe surgical interventions in accordance with the requirements of medical science, in order to restore physically or psychologically impaired health, performed by a person authorized to practice medicine, to alleviate suffering, and if this is not possible, to protect healthy people from disease by carrying out population planning or medical research” [18, 25, 26]. The concept of medical intervention includes surgical interventions, anesthesia, radiotherapy, shock therapy, ultrasound, drug treatments, blood tests, organ function tests, vaccines, laparoscopy, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, genetic tests (gene analyses), birth control methods, and vaccine applications, and diet which may be recommended. However, not everything within the scope of health care is medical intervention. For example, the health service provided by the person in charge who admits the patient to the hospital and carries out the official paperwork is not a medical intervention. Again, the procedure performed by the personnel who transfer the patient from one place to another in the hospital on a stretcher is not a medical intervention. Therefore, every medical intervention is health care, but not every health service is a medical intervention [27].
In order for nurses to provide medical intervention, certain legal conditions must be met. The legality conditions of medical intervention also apply to nurses. The conditions for the legality of medical intervention are that the person performing the medical intervention must be a nurse, there must be an indication, there must be informed consent, and the nurse must perform an attentive medical intervention in accordance with the requirements of medical science. Medical intervention performed by complying with all these issues is a legal medical intervention. For example, if the person performing the intervention is not a nurse (such as a nursing student), the medical intervention is performed without a medical indication (such as giving unnecessary injections in order to get money), or the medical intervention is performed without informing the patient, that is, without obtaining his/her consent, it is considered unlawful and causes the nurse to be criminally liable [21, 25, 28].
First of all, medical intervention can only be legal if the person performing the intervention is authorized to do so. Therefore, medical intervention should be performed by authorized persons, that is, healthcare professionals. The term health worker is understood as a physician, dentist, pharmacist, midwife, nurse, or other person providing health services (TPC article 280/2). So, even though the ambulance driver serves in the healthcare field, he cannot be considered a healthcare worker. Interventions made by people who are not authorized to perform medical intervention under the relevant laws are against the law because they are exceeding their authority. In such a case, the person who made the unauthorized intervention will be held responsible for the crime he committed negligently, recklessly or intentionally according to the provisions of the criminal law. For example, Article 99 of the Turkish Penal Code regulates that a pregnant woman who is less than ten weeks pregnant will be punished if her child is aborted by an unauthorized person, even if she consents. Therefore, if a nurse who is not authorized to perform an abortion performs an abortion on such a pregnant woman, the nurse will be the perpetrator of this crime. Likewise, a nursing student will be liable for the crime of intentional injury if an injury occurs as a result of giving an injection to a neighbor. The second condition for medical intervention to be lawful is that it must be aimed at at least one of the legally prescribed purposes. According to Article 13/3 of the Medical Deontology Regulation, medical interventions can be performed for the purposes of diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and population planning. In addition, today, aesthetic interventions are also considered medical interventions. The third condition is that medical intervention must be performed with care and attention within the current and accepted principles and rules required by the nursing profession. The last condition is that the patient has given consent for medical intervention. The consent of the person concerned, which is a condition for legality in criminal law (TPC Article 26/2), is also a valid condition for legality in medical law. The validity of this consent is only possible by informing the patient. In this context, informed consent, which is the form of patient consent in medical law, means “A nurse, who is an officially qualified person, informs the patient of the type, form, urgency, content, side effects and risks of the medical intervention planned to be performed. This can be defined as “equipping the patient with information that will enable him or her to make a free decision about medical intervention by explaining negative consequences that may occur if such an intervention is not performed.” [21, 29, 30]. Therefore, the nurse’s medical intervention becomes lawful only if the patient or their legal representative consents to the medical intervention. This clarification (informed consent) should be made by personally discussing with the patient, including the reason for the intervention to be applied by the nurse, its scope, risks, and the consequences of refusing the intervention. Medical intervention performed without the patient’s consent is against the law and the patient has the right to refuse medical intervention. For example, if the patient does not accept serum for his or her treatment, the nurse cannot establish an intravenous line and administer serum to the patient without the patient’s consent, because the patient has the right to refuse treatment in accordance with Article 25 of the PRR This is also called passive euthanasia [31]. Nurses should respect the wishes of patients who temporarily or completely refuse treatment [29].
The patient may face some negative consequences as a result of the nurse’s reckless action. While negligent homicide is a crime in case of the death of a patient, if the patient is injured or loses a limb, the crime of negligent injury will be brought to the agenda. In this case, the nurse is punished like someone who unintentionally hits someone in a traffic accident and causes death, or who injures a colleague by pressing a wrong button while working in a factory. The point to be explained here is that since there is no separate legal regulation for nurses, they will be held responsible in line with general principles of criminal law.
Failure of nurses to perform their duties as required may lead to some types of crimes defined in the Turkish Penal Code, of which nurses may be the perpetrators. The types of crimes that are included in criminal law and cause criminal liability for nurses can be listed as follows: Intentional Homicide (TPC Article 81), Intentional murder committed through negligence (TPC Article 83), Aiding Suicide (TPC Article 84), Reckless homicide (TPC Art. 85), Intentional injury committed by negligent behavior (TCK Art. 88), Reckless Injury (TCK Article 89), Failure to Fulfill the Assistance and Notification Obligations (TPC Article 98), Abortion (TPC Article 99), Providing Data Illegally (violation of the obligation of confidentiality) (TPC Article 136), Forgery of Official Document (TPC Article 204), Abuse of Office (TPC Article 257), Failure of Healthcare Professionals to Report the Crime (TPC Article 280), Child’s Changing family ties (TPC Article 231), Embezzlement, Extortion, Bribery (TPC Article 247, Article 250, Article 252), Disclosure of secrets related to duty (TPC Article 258), and Abandonment or non-performance of public duty (TPC Article 260). For example, if a nurse working in the emergency room encounters an indication that a crime has been committed (for example, a gunshot wound) while on duty, and does not report the situation to the competent authorities or delays in this regard, TCK Art. he or she will be responsible for the crime specified in Article 280. Again, if a nurse responds to the patient’s wish to die and the lethal drug is administered to the patient by the nurse, the crime of intentional homicide will be committed by carrying out active euthanasia, which is prohibited under Turkish Law (TPC Article 81, PPRR Article 13).
The criminal liability of nurses mostly arises from their faulty medical interventions. In field studies conducted in recent years, it has been observed that one in five nurses in each shift makes a medical error [18]. In Turkish Criminal Law, actions in which the patient is harmed due to the nurse’s careless or unprecautionary actions are described as negligent actions. In such a situation, the nurse foresees the outcome when performing medical intervention, does not want the outcome, but does not take the necessary precautions. According to the Turkish Penal Code, faulty medical practices are considered within the scope of “negligent crimes” (TPC Article 85, Article 89) [21]. In the Turkish Penal Code, negligence is divided into two: conscious and unconscious negligence. In Article 22/2 of the Law, unconscious (simple) negligence is defined as follows: “Negligence is the performance of a behavior without foreseeing the consequences specified in the legal definition of the crime, due to violation of the duty of care and attention .” Article 22/3 of the law defines conscious negligence as follows: “There is conscious negligence if the result occurs even though the person does not want the result predicted; in this case, the penalty for the reckless crime is increased from one third to one half.”. As can be understood from the articles of the law, the most important element that distinguishes conscious negligence from unconscious negligence is the element of foreseeability. In this respect, unconscious negligence is the normal form of negligence. It is a situation where the perpetrator does not foresee a foreseeable outcome [32, 33], acts contrary to the duty of care and attention expected from him, and fails to think about it at all, causing the outcome and the crime to occur [34]. In such cases, the perpetrator violated his duty of care and did not foresee the foreseeable outcome. On the other hand, there is conscious negligence if the perpetrator foresees that the result is in the legal definition and therefore a crime may occur, but does not want this result and tries to prevent the result from occurring, and yet the crime occurs [35]. In this sense, it would not be wrong to say that the perpetrator of conscious negligence is more dangerous than the perpetrator of simple negligence.

Methods

Purpose and type of research

This study was conducted as a descriptive study. The purpose of this article is to examine nurses’ criminal liability and senior nursing students’ awareness of these responsibilities.

Research questions

In this research, senior nursing students who participated in the survey were asked personal information questions and information questions about health law legislation, medical intervention and conditions of medical intervention, types of culpability in criminal law, and types of crimes that nurses can commit in criminal law.

Place and time the research was conducted

The research was conducted at a university in the city of Izmir between October and December 2020.

Data collection method

A research questionnaire prepared by the researchers was used as a data collection tool in the study which was in line with the literature review and contained questions about the personal information of senior nursing students and the criminal responsibilities of nurses. In the first part of the questionnaire, students were asked 13 questions including their personal information (age, education, whether they had received training on criminal liability, and whether they had studied health legislation) and family information (whether they were a healthcare professional or a member of a lawyer’s family). In the second part, 16 questions were asked about the conditions of medical intervention, types of medical errors, types of culpability in criminal law, and types of crimes in the Turkish Penal Code. The students were asked a total of 29 questions.

Population and sample of the research

All senior students (n = 309) of the Faculty of Nursing, who were studying in the 2020–2021 academic year of the university, constituted the population of the research. Since the aim was to reach the entire population, no separate sample selection was made. The study was completed with 300 students who were studying between the dates of the research and who agreed to participate in the research.

Collection of data

Data was collected online via Google Forms. A questionnaire form developed by the researchers by reviewing the relevant literature was used for data collection (5,14,18,24,28). The questionnaire used in the study consisted of questions (1–13) about the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants and the presence of family members’ relationship with health and law, and questions (14–29) about the criminal responsibility of nurses. Participants were asked 29 questions in the questionnaire.

Data analysis

The data obtained from the research were analyzed in SPSS 20 (Statistics Package for the Social Sciences. It was coded and analyzed by researchers in the sciences program. Numbers and percentages, averages, and chi-square tests were used to evaluate the data. The results were evaluated at a 95% confidence interval and significance at the p < 0.05 level.

Ethical considerations

Ethical permission to conduct the research was obtained from Ege University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee with the decision dated 6 August 2020, approval number 06/02-632. In addition, informed consent was obtained from the senior nursing students who agreed to participate in the research.

Results

The socio-demographic characteristics of the students participating in the research are shown in Table 1. The average age of the students participating in the research was 22.27 ± 0.98 years (min = 20, max = 25); 81.7% of the students were women and 18.3% were men. The graduation status of the students was that 67.3% had graduated from Anatolian high school, 25% had graduated from regular high school, and 4.3% had graduated from health vocational high school. While 13.3% of the students were working as professional nurses, 86.7% had not yet embarked on working life. At this point, it should be noted that nursing education in Turkey is also provided at high school level. Nurses who are graduates of health vocational high schools provide health services professionally, and 13.3% of the nurses in this segment were health vocational high school graduates. This is legal under Turkish law. Only 28.7% of the students had a healthcare professional in their family, but 17% had a lawyer in their family. The majority of students declared that they had heard of the concept of malpractice, but 30.3% stated that they did not know the concept of malpractice.
Table 1
Socio-demographic characteristics of the students
Socio-demographic characteristics
Number
%
Age group
  
20–23 years old
24 and over
271
29
90.3
9.7
Gender
  
Male
Female
55
245
18.3
81.7
High School Graduated
  
Anatolia
Straight
Health Profession
Other (Science, teacher, commerce, etc.)
202
75
13
10
67.3
25.0
4.3
3.3
Working Status
  
Working
Not working
40
260
13.3
86.7
Health Worker in the Family
  
Yes
No
86
214
28.7
71.3
Lawyer in the family
  
Yes
No
51
249
17.0
83.0
Hearing Malpractice
  
Yes
No
Total
209
91
300
69.7
30.3
100.0
The status of the students participating in the study on receiving information regarding the criminal responsibilities of nurses and their distribution according to information sources are shown in Table 2. It was found that 63.7% of the students had received training on criminal responsibilities during their nursing education. The education received regarding criminal liability was largely provided by the relevant faculty member during the course; 81.7% of the students stated that they had received information about their rights and responsibilities and that the source of this education was the information provided by the relevant faculty member in the course.
Table 2
Information receiving the status of the students participating in their search and their distribution according to information sources
Information Receipt Status
Number
%
Information on criminal liability (n = 300)
  
Yes
No
191
109
63.7
36.3
Information on rights and responsibilities (n = 300)
  
Yes
No
245
55
81.7
18.3
Reading legislation (n = 300)
  
Yes
No
120
180
39.7
60.3
Sources of information regarding criminal liability (n = 191)
  
Seminar
Lesson
Panel/symposium
33
140
18
17.3
73.3
9.4
Sources regarding rights and responsibilities (n = 245)
  
Seminar
Lesson
Panel/symposium
35
191
21
14.4
77.9
5.9
Table 3 shows students’ knowledge of criminal liability. In this table, there is a distribution of findings regarding medical intervention and the conditions of medical intervention, the types of culpability in criminal law, and the nurses’ responses to the types of crimes that nurses can commit in criminal law. It was found that 20.7% of the students participating in the research correctly stated the legality conditions of medical intervention. Only 26% of the students stated that a medical intervention should be performed by an authorized person. Also, 48.7% of the students correctly answered the question regarding the purposes for which the medical intervention was performed, that is, whether the medical intervention was performed in line with the purpose specified in the law. The students correctly answered the questions regarding informed consent, which is a condition of the legality of medical intervention, at a rate of 72.7% and 55.7%. The majority of the students (75%) answered the question regarding the duties and authority of nurses incorrectly.
The information that the rules regarding criminal liability are not regulated in a special law was marked as correct information by only 37% of the students. The rate of students who knew the types of responsibilities arising from nursing procedures was 36%. The distribution of students’ answers to questions regarding the types of culpability defined in the Turkish Penal Code was as follows: 39.7% of the students were able to define simple negligence, but 73.3% were able to define conscious negligence. Apart from this general information, students were asked questions about the types of crimes defined in the Turkish Penal Code that nurses may be guilty of. The majority of the students (70.7%) gave an incorrect answer to the question regarding the crime of intentional injury defined in Article 86 of the Turkish Penal Code. Again, 66% of the students correctly answered the question regarding the crime of intentional homicide, 20% of the students could not define the elements of the crime of reckless homicide, and 71.7% of the students know that if there is an indication that a crime has been committed while on duty, the crime must be reported to the competent authorities.
Table 3
Participants’ level of knowledge of information on criminal responsibilities
 
Correct answer
N %
Wrong answer
N %
Don’t know
N %
The legality of the medical intervention in terms of the person
78
26.0
185
61.7
37
12.3
Determining the scope of duties of nurses in case there is no clear provision in the legislation regarding medical interventions within the scope of their duties.
75
25.0
204
68.0
21
7.0
Being able to characterize the concept of healthcare worker
164
54.7
134
44.6
2
0.7
Knowing the purpose of medical intervention
145
48.7
118
39.0
37
12.3
Knowing the conditions of legality of medical intervention
62
20.7
171
56.8
67
22.5
Knowing the criminal liability of the person who performs the intervention if a medical intervention that should be performed by a nurse is not performed by the nurse (Crime of intentional injury, TPC Article 86)
88
29.3
178
59.4
34
11.3
Knowing the types of responsibilities arising from nursing procedures
108
36.0
116
38.7
76
25.3
Being able to define negligence
119
39.7
137
45.6
44
14.7
Knowing the types of crimes in the Turkish Penal Code that can be committed by nurses
39
13.0
-
-
261
87.0
In our legal system, active euthanasia is not considered lawful in any way. The patient’s consent in this regard cannot be accepted as a reason for non-compliance with the law. The nurse is tried for intentional homicide whether the patient requests it or not. (Correct information)
198
66.0
53
17.7
49
16.3
Although the patient states that he is allergic to analgesics, the nurse’s administration of analgesic is conscious negligence (Ability to define conscious negligence - Correct information)
220
73.3
44
14.7
36
12.0
Premature miscarriage or birth of the child as a result of the nurse’s reckless actions constitutes the crime of reckless homicide. (Wrong information)
80
20.0
190
63.3
50
16.7
Nurses and midwives will be subject to the same rules as everyone else when they commit criminal acts. There are no special criminal liability rules. (Correct information)
111
37.0
44
14.7
38
12.7
The patient has the right to refuse treatment (passive euthanasia). In such a case, the nurse is not punished. (Obtaining informed consent, which is a condition of legality of medical intervention - Correct information)
218
72.7
73
16.5
39
8.8
It is legal to open an intravenous line and give serum to a patient who does not accept intravenous serum for treatment (obtaining informed consent, which is a legal condition for medical intervention-Wrong information).
167
55.7
82
27.3
51
17.0
As healthcare professionals, nurses will be criminally liable if they fail to report the situation to the competent authorities or if they delay in this regard when they encounter an indication that a crime has been committed. (Correct information)
215
71.7
37
12.3
48
16.0

Discussion

When the distribution of nursing students’ answers regarding criminal responsibilities regulated in the Turkish Penal Code was examined, it was determined that mostly wrong answers were given.
It was determined that there was no significant difference in the comparison between the dependent variables of the study (criminal responsibilities regulated in the Turkish Penal Code) and the independent variables (employment status, hearing about the concept of malpractice, receiving training on criminal responsibilities, participating in events such as panels and symposiums). For example, although 69.7% of senior nursing students knew the concept of malpractice, the fact that they had done almost no research on this subject outside of class and that they had participated in educational studies such as seminars, panels, symposiums, and certificates shows that they were not aware of their criminal responsibilities or did not care enough about this issue.
Although there are many legal regulations regarding health law, it was observed that 60.3% of senior nursing students had not read any of these regulations. This shows that when these students start their professional life, they will be left defenseless due to their insufficient knowledge in determining the legal nature of their duties and powers and the nursing procedures they perform until they receive any legal assistance when faced with any criminal liability.
As a result of the research, it was clearly seen that senior nursing students do not know the legality conditions of medical intervention. This shows that students have the potential to unknowingly perform many illegal medical procedures when they enter professional life. This increases the possibility that student nurses will be subject to criminal sanctions after they start working in their profession.
This study revealed that only 13% of the students knew the types of crimes regulated in the Turkish Penal Code of which nurses can be perpetrators and that a course on health law should be added to the curriculum during nursing education. When steps are taken in this direction, students will become more sensitive to the subject. At the same time, it will be ensured that the violation of fundamental rights and freedoms in the field of health where nurses serve will be reduced to a minimum. Especially considering the proportion of students (27.3%) who are aware of the existence of the right to refuse treatment, the protection of patient rights defined in the Constitution and other legal texts will be guaranteed.
In addition, the results of this study also show that faculty and school administrators who train nurses need to take important steps to prepare students for the profession. In this respect, it is thought that faculty and college administrations can inform their students about legal issues related to the nursing profession, support their development, and contribute to their awareness of their criminal responsibilities by organizing events such as symposiums, panels, and seminars regarding the criminal liability of nurses.

Conclusion

The result of our research clearly showed that the majority of senior nursing students have insufficient knowledge of their professional criminal responsibilities, that they are not aware of their duties, powers, and criminal responsibilities defined in the legislation, and that they do not know the types of crimes regulated in the Turkish Penal Code. The results of this research showed that a course on health (medical) law should be added to the course curriculum during the undergraduate nursing education of students before they start their professional careers. It is thought that this initiative will enable senior nursing students to cope with problems related to professional law when they step into the profession.

Limitation

The limitation of the research is that it was applied only to university students.

Acknowledgements

The participants are acknowledged for their contribution to the present research.

Declarations

Ethics approval

For the conduct of the research, ethical permission was obtained from Ege University “Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee” with the decision dated 06.08.2020, approval number 06/02-632. In addition, informed consent was obtained from senior nursing students who agreed to participate in the research. All procedures, including the informed consent process, were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuğuoğlu S, Çövener Ç, Tanır MT, Aktaş E. İlaç uygulamalarında hemşirenin mesleki ve yasal sorumluluğu. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Bilim Ve Sanatı Dergisi. 2009;2(2):86–93. Kuğuoğlu S, Çövener Ç, Tanır MT, Aktaş E. İlaç uygulamalarında hemşirenin mesleki ve yasal sorumluluğu. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Bilim Ve Sanatı Dergisi. 2009;2(2):86–93.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Güzel S, Yavuz MS, Aşırdizer M. Adli tıp kurumu ihtisas kurulları ile yüksek sağlık şurası raporları arasında çelişkili bulunan ve adli tıp kurumu’nda görüşülen olguların incelenmesi. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2002;7:14–20. Güzel S, Yavuz MS, Aşırdizer M. Adli tıp kurumu ihtisas kurulları ile yüksek sağlık şurası raporları arasında çelişkili bulunan ve adli tıp kurumu’nda görüşülen olguların incelenmesi. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2002;7:14–20.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Şahin D, Faikoğlu R, Şahin İ, et al. Malpractice in nursing: case reports. Bull Legal Med. 2014;19:100–4.CrossRef Şahin D, Faikoğlu R, Şahin İ, et al. Malpractice in nursing: case reports. Bull Legal Med. 2014;19:100–4.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kıvrak S. Kayseri ölçeğinde tıbbi uygulama hatası iddialarının değerlendirilmesi. Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi.Erciyes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Kayseri.2014. Kıvrak S. Kayseri ölçeğinde tıbbi uygulama hatası iddialarının değerlendirilmesi. Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi.Erciyes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Kayseri.2014.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Can İÖ, Özkara E, Can M. Yargıtay’da karara bağlanan tıbbi uygulama hatası dosyalarının değerlendirilmesi. DEU Tıp Dergisi. 2011;25:69–76. Can İÖ, Özkara E, Can M. Yargıtay’da karara bağlanan tıbbi uygulama hatası dosyalarının değerlendirilmesi. DEU Tıp Dergisi. 2011;25:69–76.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ertem G, Oksel E, Akbıyık A. Hatalı tıbbi Uygulamalar (malpraktis) ile ilgili retrospektif bir inceleme. Dirim Tıp Dergisi. 2009;84:1–10. Ertem G, Oksel E, Akbıyık A. Hatalı tıbbi Uygulamalar (malpraktis) ile ilgili retrospektif bir inceleme. Dirim Tıp Dergisi. 2009;84:1–10.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gündoğmuş ÜN, Özkara E, Mete S. Nursing and midwifery malpractice in Turkey based on the higher health council records. Nurs Ethics. 2004;11:489–99.CrossRefPubMed Gündoğmuş ÜN, Özkara E, Mete S. Nursing and midwifery malpractice in Turkey based on the higher health council records. Nurs Ethics. 2004;11:489–99.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Safran N. Hemşirelik ve ebelikte malpraktis. Sosyal Bilimler Anabilim Dalı Doktora Tezi.İ.Ü. Adli Tıp Enstitüsü, 2004.İstanbul. Safran N. Hemşirelik ve ebelikte malpraktis. Sosyal Bilimler Anabilim Dalı Doktora Tezi.İ.Ü. Adli Tıp Enstitüsü, 2004.İstanbul.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hızarcı Ş, Bakır S, Kavlak O. Kadın hastalıkları ve doğum kliniğinde çalışan hemşire ve ebelerin tıbbi hatalarda hukuki sorumluluklara yönelik bilgi ve tutumlarının incelenmesi. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi. 2021;8(2):221–31. Hızarcı Ş, Bakır S, Kavlak O. Kadın hastalıkları ve doğum kliniğinde çalışan hemşire ve ebelerin tıbbi hatalarda hukuki sorumluluklara yönelik bilgi ve tutumlarının incelenmesi. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi. 2021;8(2):221–31.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Polat O. Tıbbi uygulama hataları: klinik-sosyal-hukuksal-etik boyutları, I. Baskı, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2005, Ankara. Polat O. Tıbbi uygulama hataları: klinik-sosyal-hukuksal-etik boyutları, I. Baskı, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2005, Ankara.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Güngör P, Merih DY, Kocabey YM. Farklı ülkelerin malpraktis konusunda yasal düzenleme girişimleri, zorunlu Mali sorumluluk sigortası. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni. 2012;43(4):131. Güngör P, Merih DY, Kocabey YM. Farklı ülkelerin malpraktis konusunda yasal düzenleme girişimleri, zorunlu Mali sorumluluk sigortası. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni. 2012;43(4):131.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Savaş H. Tıbbi Müdahale Hataları. 62 Ankara; 2009. Savaş H. Tıbbi Müdahale Hataları. 62 Ankara; 2009.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Caymaz M. Sağlık personelinin tıbbi uygulama hatalarından doğan cezai sorumlulukları. İmeva Kitapları. 2024;4:57. İstanbul. Caymaz M. Sağlık personelinin tıbbi uygulama hatalarından doğan cezai sorumlulukları. İmeva Kitapları. 2024;4:57. İstanbul.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Akalın EH. Bakım ünitelerinde hasta güvenliği. Yoğun Bakım Dergisi. 2005;5(3):146. Akalın EH. Bakım ünitelerinde hasta güvenliği. Yoğun Bakım Dergisi. 2005;5(3):146.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tüzüner Ö, Duymuş ET. Yargıtay kararları ışığında hemşirenin hukuki sorumluluğu. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi. 2021;157:407–44. Tüzüner Ö, Duymuş ET. Yargıtay kararları ışığında hemşirenin hukuki sorumluluğu. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi. 2021;157:407–44.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Terzioğlu F, Şahan UF. Hemşirelerin tıbbi müdahalede karar verme yetkisi ve Konumu. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi. 2017;3:3–4. Terzioğlu F, Şahan UF. Hemşirelerin tıbbi müdahalede karar verme yetkisi ve Konumu. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi. 2017;3:3–4.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurşat Z. Hemşirenin hukuki sorumluluğu. İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası,2008;66(1): 293–322. Kurşat Z. Hemşirenin hukuki sorumluluğu. İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası,2008;66(1): 293–322.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakeri H. Tıp hukuku. Seçkin Yayıncılık, 18. Baskı. Ankara.2020. Hakeri H. Tıp hukuku. Seçkin Yayıncılık, 18. Baskı. Ankara.2020.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalabalık H. Ebe ve hemşirelerin idare hukuku açısından sorumluluğu. III. Sağlık Kurultayı, 7–8 Mayıs 2010. Ankara Barosu Yayınları. 432 – 405; 2010. Kalabalık H. Ebe ve hemşirelerin idare hukuku açısından sorumluluğu. III. Sağlık Kurultayı, 7–8 Mayıs 2010. Ankara Barosu Yayınları. 432 – 405; 2010.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ünver Y. Hekimin cezai sorumluluğu. Roche Sağlık Hukuku Günleri, Tebliğler, 2007; 118. Ünver Y. Hekimin cezai sorumluluğu. Roche Sağlık Hukuku Günleri, Tebliğler, 2007; 118.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Köroğlu E. Sağlık.Hukuk Sempozyumu Bildiri Özet Kitabı. Kayseri.2018. Köroğlu E. Sağlık.Hukuk Sempozyumu Bildiri Özet Kitabı. Kayseri.2018.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Çakmut YÖ. Tıbbi uygulamalarda ebelerin cezai sorumluluğu.III. Sağlık Hukuku Kurultayı, 2012: 490–511. Çakmut YÖ. Tıbbi uygulamalarda ebelerin cezai sorumluluğu.III. Sağlık Hukuku Kurultayı, 2012: 490–511.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gökcan HT. Tıbbi müdahaleden doğan hukuki ve cezai sorumluluk. 3. Baskı. Ankara.Seçkin Yayınevi; 2017. Gökcan HT. Tıbbi müdahaleden doğan hukuki ve cezai sorumluluk. 3. Baskı. Ankara.Seçkin Yayınevi; 2017.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ersöz K. Tıbbi Müdahale kavramı ve tıbbi müdahalenin hukuka uygunluğu. Terazi Aylık Hukuk Dergisi. 2010;5(45):105–22. Ersöz K. Tıbbi Müdahale kavramı ve tıbbi müdahalenin hukuka uygunluğu. Terazi Aylık Hukuk Dergisi. 2010;5(45):105–22.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Işık O, Akbolat M, Çetin M, Çimen M. Hemşirelerin bakış açısıyla tıbbi hataların değerlendirilmesi. Türk Silahlı Kuvvetler Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni. 2012;11(4):421–30. Işık O, Akbolat M, Çetin M, Çimen M. Hemşirelerin bakış açısıyla tıbbi hataların değerlendirilmesi. Türk Silahlı Kuvvetler Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni. 2012;11(4):421–30.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Altuntaş ÇG, Elmas S. Hemşirelik uygulamalarında aydınlatılmış Onam. Akdeniz Hemşirelik Dergisi. 2023;2(2):65–72.CrossRef Altuntaş ÇG, Elmas S. Hemşirelik uygulamalarında aydınlatılmış Onam. Akdeniz Hemşirelik Dergisi. 2023;2(2):65–72.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Boran B. Aydınlatılmış rıza. Sağlık Hukuku Kurultayı. Ankara Barosu- Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2008: 85–103. Boran B. Aydınlatılmış rıza. Sağlık Hukuku Kurultayı. Ankara Barosu- Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2008: 85–103.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Erdem KM, Erdem D. Türk Hukukunda ötenazi. Terazi Hukuk Dergisi. 2021;16(176):764–8. Erdem KM, Erdem D. Türk Hukukunda ötenazi. Terazi Hukuk Dergisi. 2021;16(176):764–8.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Demirbaş T. Ceza kanunu. Genel hükümler, Ankara. 2009. Demirbaş T. Ceza kanunu. Genel hükümler, Ankara. 2009.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahmut K, İlhan Ü. Türk Ceza Hukuku. Ankara: Genel hükümler; 2008. Mahmut K, İlhan Ü. Türk Ceza Hukuku. Ankara: Genel hükümler; 2008.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Centel N, Zafer H, Çakmut Ö. Türk ceza hukukuna giriş. İstanbul. 2008. Centel N, Zafer H, Çakmut Ö. Türk ceza hukukuna giriş. İstanbul. 2008.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Özbek VÖ, Kanbur N, Bacaksız P, Doğan K, Tepe İ. Türk ceza hukuku genel hükümler. Ankara 2010. Özbek VÖ, Kanbur N, Bacaksız P, Doğan K, Tepe İ. Türk ceza hukuku genel hükümler. Ankara 2010.
Metadaten
Titel
Criminal responsibilities of nurses in Turkish criminal law and determining the awareness levels of senior nursing students regarding this responsibility
verfasst von
Müjgan Solak
Nebahat Kayaer
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02418-6