Academic emotion, a concept introduced by the German educational psychologist Pekrun [
4], is a central focus of this study. The Chinese version of the General Academic Emotions Questionnaire for college students was compiled by Professor Ma in 2008 [
5]. This scale has a Cronaabachs α of 0.641 ~ 0.887 and test–retest reliability of 0.563 ~ 0.886, which serves as our foundation. Building upon the theory of academic emotions, our research explores the diverse emotional experiences associated with students' academic activities during their college years. As research advances, the definition of academic emotions has expanded to encompass reactions to both academic success or failure and emotions experienced during routine homework assignments [
6]. The questionnaire comprises 88 self-assessment items, encompassing emotions such as interest, happiness, pride, hope, relief, anger, anxiety, shame, disappointment, and boredom. We employed a five-point scoring system: 5 points for "completely consistent," 4 points for "relatively consistent," 3 points for "uncertain," 2 points for "not quite consistent," and 1 point for "completely inconsistent." The questionnaire exhibited strong internal consistency, with coefficients ranging from 0.641 to 0.887, and satisfactory test–retest reliability, ranging from 0.563 to 0.866. These ten factors within the scale can be classified into four dimensions: the negative hyperarousal dimension encompasses shame, anxiety, and anger. It refers to an elevated state of physiological and psychological arousal, where an individual experiences heightened stress or anxiety levels, often as a response to distressing or traumatic experiences. The positive hyperarousal dimension includes interest, pleasure, and hope. It refers to an elevated state of physiological and psychological arousal, which is often characterized by increased alertness, anxiety, and a heightened stress response. Negative hypoarousal dimensions consist of disappointment and boredom. It is often characterized by feelings of lethargy, lack of motivation, and emotional numbness. The positive hypoarousal dimension comprises pride and relief. Hypoarousal typically refers to a state of reduced physiological and psychological arousal, which is often associated with feelings of lethargy, low energy, and emotional numbness. It is noteworthy that the shaping of college students' personalities may exert a significant influence on their ability to regulate emotions [
7,
8].
College student hardiness personality rating scale
A hardiness personality is a constructive personality trait that integrates cognitive abilities, behavior, and emotions. It equips individuals with the capacity to maintain a positive outlook, remain optimistic and enterprising, exhibit persistence in both cognitive and emotional aspects, and demonstrate strong self-control when confronted with challenges [
9]. A substantial body of research has consistently demonstrated that a hardy personality serves as a valuable resource for effectively managing stress [
10,
11]. Professor Lu and colleagues developed the College Students' Hardiness Scale [
12], based on the resilience personality theory. This scale established the Chinese resilience personality structure, comprising four dimensions: hardiness, input, control, and challenge. The scale includes 27 items, with a four-point scoring method: "completely in line with" for four points, "in line with" for three points, "somewhat in line with" for two points, and "completely not in conformity with" for one point. The coefficients of the four subscales were 0.785, 0.747, 0.784, and 0.802, respectively, while the total scale exhibited high reliability with a coefficient of 0.910. The hardiness dimension reflects the characteristics of individuals who are resolute and unwavering in their pursuit of goals, maintain an optimistic and enterprising attitude when faced with adversity, and exhibit persistence. The control dimension mirrors the traits of individuals actively managing and influencing the events they encounter, while the engagement dimension signifies individuals' commitment and focus on their activities. Lastly, the challenge dimension represents the qualities of individuals who draw strength from practical experiences, with the total score providing an overall assessment of an individual's degree of personality resilience.