Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2023 | Research

Approaches and styles of mothers in sex education process of children and the related factors

verfasst von: Elnaz Faraji Nesfechi, Moluk Pouralizadeh, Zahra Bostani Khalesi, Saman Maroufizadeh

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2023

Abstract

Introduction

Sex education supports the development of suitable sexual behaviors in children. However, due to the limitations of sexual issues in Iran, parents may have different sex education styles. This study aimed to assess the styles of mothers in the sex education process of children and the related factors.

Methods

In a cross-sectional study, from March to May 2021, 306 mothers with a 4–12-year-old child who were referred to the comprehensive health service centers in Rasht city were entered into the study by a convenience sampling method. The tool was a questionnaire of parents' sex education styles. Data analysis was performed with independent t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and the multiple linear regression model using SPSS software version 16.

Results

The majority of the mothers had a mean age of 36.2 ± 6.4 years. The score of the authoritarian sex education style was significantly higher than the other styles (P < 0.001). According to the multivariate analysis, 40.6% of the changes in the strict style (R2 = 0.406), 32.7% of the changes in the permissive style (R2 = 0.327), and 36.1% of the changes in the authoritative style (R2 = 0.361) were explained by the personal characteristics of the participants.

Conclusion

The authoritative style was a dominant sex education style. Identifying the factors associated with types of child sex education styles has an important role in promoting the health of children and the community. It is recommended that nursing policymakers identify related factors of sex education styles in mothers of different cultures, and therefore, implement training programs for empowering mothers.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lay summary

A cross-sectional study aimed to determine the sex education styles and the related factors in Iranian mothers. According to the results the authoritative style was a dominant style among Iranian mothers. There was no statistically significant difference between strict and permissive style scores

Introduction

Sex education includes a variety of physical, psychological, mental, and social aspects. It is educating children based on sexual development and their psychological and physical aspects [1]. The purpose of sex education is to support the development of sexual behaviors, the survival of generations, and achieve peace. Today, the general public widely accepts the importance of sex education for children worldwide. Sex education for children is one of the most sensitive subjects of family development [2]. There are different ideas on whether or not children should receive sex education, which topics such an education would include, and at what age such education should be started. In particular, parental awareness of the role they play in the personal development of their children will have a positive effect on their children’s sexual development. A child who receives sex education in phases in a manner appropriate to his/her age would be expected to be more stable in his/her relationships with the opposite sex in later life [3].
Talking to children about sexuality early on establishes it as a normal topic, and avoids awkward and fraught interventions that inevitably occur too late. Secrecy surrounding sex breeds fear and shame, whereas appropriate openness encourages children to ask questions. It is infinitely preferable to have them ask you for answers than try to figure it out on their own only to stumble upon misinformation [2].
In this regard, what can impact the effectiveness of these training courses is to assess the approaches and the styles that parents use for the sex education of their children. Parental sex education styles properly inform the child and help the parents with different attitudes and behaviors in dealing with the child’s sexual development [3].
Various effective factors in the sex education of children included; cultural beliefs, barriers to communication between children and their parents, inadequate skills, negative attitudes, the stigma. These factors create various children's sex education styles [4].
Iran is an Asian country with a majority Muslim population and different cultures, which have a great impact on the lifestyle and beliefs of the people of this country. According to the studies, Iranian parents have, three types of parenting sex education styles, including; authoritative style (good communication between parents and children by providing sex information), strict style (punishment and restriction of the expression of sexual problems), and permissive style (sexually unruly behavior in the children) [3]. Olubunmi et al. defined parenting style as the psychological construct representing standard strategies that parents use in their child-rearing. They reported that parenting styles are categorized into three major forms; authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting styles [5]. Moussa stated the four parenting education styles that encompass many behaviors of parents including authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and neglectful [6].
Ashcraft and Murray, in their study, showed that, regardless of having the proper knowledge of the parents, their methods for children’s sex education were not appropriate [7]. Regarding Iranian parents’ experiences and the point views on child sex education, Merghati-Khoei et al. showed that due to parents' beliefs in the innocence of children and their inadequate skills in sex education, they were strict in dealing with their children and therefore did not want to have sex education with their children [8].
To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first research about styles used by Iranian mothers for their children’s sex education. Due to the religious laws in Iran, sexual issues are often considered taboo, so it can be effective in choosing the parent’s sex education styles. In this regard, examining the selected styles of the parents for the sex education of their children and paying attention to the attitude of Iranian parents is so important because it is related to the physical and mental health of children. Therefore, It has an influential role in promoting public and community health and is one of the critical duties of pediatric nurses in children's developmental topics [9]. This study aimed to investigate the approaches and styles of mothers in the sex education process of children and the related factors.

Materials and methods

Research design and setting

This study was a cross-sectional study on mothers with 4–12-year-old children who were referred to the comprehensive health service centers in Rasht city (one of the northern cities in Iran).

Participants and sampling

The participants were selected using the convenience sampling method and 306 mothers who were referred to these centers for vaccination and health care of their children were recruited to this study. All participants who were willing to participate and could understand and speak Persian were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were lack of complete answers to the research questionnaire and refusal to participate during the study period. The sample size was calculated based on the permissive sex education style mean score in the study of Abdollahzadeh and Khosravi [3] with α = 0.05, d = 1, σ = 7.97. Therefore, 244 samples were determined based on the following formula and by considering a 25% attrition rate, 306 mothers were entered into the study.
$$n=\frac{{Z}_{1-\alpha }^{2}/{2}^{{\sigma }^{2}}}{{d}^{2}}$$
$$\alpha =0.05, {z}_{1-\alpha }/{z}_{0.975}=1.95$$
$$\mathrm{n}=\frac{{\mathrm{z}}_{1-\mathrm{\alpha }/2}^{2}{\upsigma }^{2}}{{\mathrm{d}}^{2}}=\frac{{1.96}^{2}{\left(7.97\right)}^{2}}{{1}^{2}}=\frac{244.02}{1}\approx 244$$

Data collection

The data were collected from all 16 comprehensive health service centers from March to May 2021, in Rasht city. For data collection, the main researcher (that was a master's student in pediatric nursing) visited comprehensive health service centers daily and with the cooperation of the director of the center identified the eligible mothers in relation to the inclusion criteria. After the introduction of the study aims, informed consent was obtained from participants and they were assured of the confidentiality of their personal data.
The data collection tool was a two-part self-report questionnaire. The first part was 27 variables of personal and familial characteristics of the parents and the child including; the mother’s age, father’s age, child’s age, child's educational level, mother’s educational status, father’s educational status, mother’s job, father’s job, mother's ethnicity, father's ethnicity, marital status, duration of marriage (year), number of children, developmental age of the child, child gender, kindergarten attendance experience, mother's supervision on the child's use of technology and mobile phones, child’s birth rank, stepmother, stepfather, child's exposure to sexual, physical and psychological abuse, type of school, child's educational status, living place, financial status, mothers’ participation in sex education training, source of mother's information. We selected the variables based on the literature review.
The second part was a questionnaire containing 33 questions about parents’ sex education styles in children's sex education that was designed and psychometrically evaluated by Abdollahzadeh and Keykhosravi in Iran [10]. This questionnaire consisted of three dimensions strict sex education style (12 questions), permissive sex education style (11 questions), and authoritative sex education style (10 questions). The questions in this questionnaire were based on a five-part Likert scale, from fully disagree (score 0) to fully agree (score 4).
The survey criteria were based on the mean rating for each style. In this study, we measured the reliability of the instrument in a pilot study using 35 samples. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for authoritarian, authoritative, and permissive sex education styles were 0.79, 0.77, and 0.72, respectively, which indicated an acceptable internal consistency. Also, a test–retest with 30 participants was done for the stability of the questionnaire during two weeks which was confirmed with ICC = 0/89.

Data analysis

In this study, continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables as frequency (percentage). Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to evaluate the normality of the distribution of variables (P > 0.05). Independent t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used to assess the relationship between sexual parenting style values and personal characteristics of parents, children, and socio-families. Also, in multivariate analyzes, a multiple linear regression model was used to determine the factors related to the scores of sex education styles. In order to compare the mean scores of sexual education styles, the Greenhouse- Geisser test and for Two by two comparison Bonferroni tests were used. Data analysis was performed with SPSS software version 16. A level of 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Data from 306 questionnaires were analyzed. The average maternal age was 6.4 ± 36.2 years. A total of 44.4% of the participants had a university education and were housekeepers (68.6%) (Table 1).
Table 1
Personal, family and social characteristics of the participants
Frequency (%)
Variables
Frequency (%)
Variables
Mean ± SD/Frequency (%)
Variables
(2.3) 7
Yes
stepfather
(63.4) 194
Gilak
Father's ethnicity
6.4 ± 36.2
Mother’s age
(97.7) 299
No
(8.8) 27
Talesh
40.5 ± 6.7
Father’s age
(1.0) 3
Yes
stepmother
(17.6) 54
Turkish
7.9 ± 2.6
Child’s age
(99.0) 303
No
(10.1) 31
Other
3.5 ± 1.8
Child's educational level
(3.6) 11
Yes
Child's exposure to sexual, physical and psychological abuse
(95.8) 293
Married
Marital status
(6.9) 21
Primary School
Mother’s educational status
(86.6) 265
No
(4.2) 13
Divorce /death of father
(13.7) 42
Secondary School
(9.8) 30
I don't know
(26.8) 82
10 > 
Duration of marriage (year)
(35.0) 107
High School
(72.8) 142
Public School
Type of school (195 = n)
(35.3) 108
10_15
(44.4) 136
University
(27.2) 53
Private School
(23.2) 71
15_20
(9.2) 28
Primary School
Father’s educational status
(10.3) 20
Weak / Medium
Child's educational (195 = n) status
(14.7) 45
20 < 
(17.3) 53
Secondary School
(34.9) 68
Good
(37.3) 114
1
Number of children
(28.4) 87
High School
(54.9) 107
Excellent
(53.3) 163
2
(45.1) 138
University
(98.4) 301
City
Living place
(9.5) 29
3 ≤ 
(68.6) 210
Housekeeper
Mother’s job
(1.6) 5
Village
75(24.5)
4–6 Years
Developmental age of the child
(5.9) 18
Self-employment
(7.5) 23
Bad
Financial status
231(75.5)
6–12 Years
(9.8) 30
Office Employed
(52.3) 160
Medium
(50.0) 153
Girl
Child gender
(12.4) 38
Medical field
(40.2) 123
Good
(50.0) 153
Boy
(3.3) 10
Other
(13.7) 42
Yes
Mothers’ participation in sex education training
(52.3) 160
Yes
Kindergarten attendance experience
(50.3) 154
Self-employment
Father’s Job
(47.7) 146
No
(28.4) 87
Office Employed
(86.3) 264
No
(16.3) 50
Labor
(58.2) 178
Internet, books, television
Source of mother's information
(95.4) 292
Yes
Mother's Supervision on the child's use of technology and mobile phones
(4.9) 15
Medical field
(4.6) 14
No
(66.3) 203
Gilak
Mother's ethnicity
(9.8) 30
Friends
(64.4) 197
First
Child 's birth rank
(8.8) 27
Talesh
(11.1) 34
Field of Study
(29.7) 91
Second
(17.0) 52
Turkish
(20.9) 64
None
(5.9) 18
Third or fourth
(7.8) 24
Other
The mean values forstrict, permissive, and authoritative sex education styles were 14.5 ± 8.7, 13.1 ± 6.3, and 30 ± 5.8, respectively. Scores for the authoritative sex education style were significantly higher than authoritarian style (P < 0.001) and permissive style (P < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference between authoritarian and permissive style scores (Table 2).
Table 2
Comparison of the mean scores of converted child sex education styles in the participants
Two-by-two comparisons
Mauchly’s Test of Sphericity
Greenhouse-Geiser test
Mean (SD)
Sex education styles
(2)χ2
P value
(1.43 and 434.6)F
P value
Permissive < Authoritative
strict < Authoritative
157.0
0.001 > 
708.6
0.001 > 
(18.2) 30.2
Strict style
(14.3) 29.8
Permissive style
(14.4) 74.9
Authoritative style
There was a significant relationship between the sex education styles with the type of school (P < 0.05) parent's educational status(P < 0.01), marital status (P < 0.01), number of children (P < 0.01), child's birth rank (P < 0.01), financial status (P < 0.001), ethnicity (P < 0.01), mothers' supervision on the child's technology use (P < 0.01), mothers' participation in sex education training (P < 0.001), and source of mothers' information (P < 0.001) (Table 3).
Table 3
Relationship between children's sex education styles and personal, family and social characteristics of the participants
Strict sex education style
Permissive sex education style
Authoritative sex education style
Variables
Mean (SD)
P value
Mean (SD)
P value
Mean (SD)
P value
(9.9) 27.5
0.001 > 
(4.9) 17.7
0.001 > 
(8.7) 24.0
0.001 > 
Primary School
Mother's educational status
(10.7) 17.4
(6.6) 14.4
(6.0) 29.0
Secondary School
(7.6) 14.1
(6.9) 12.8
(5.6) 30.3
High School
(6.6) 12.0
(5.6) 12.2
(4.6) 30.9
University
(10.8) 23.3
0.001 > 
(6.6) 16.7
0.001 > 
(6.8) 26.2
0.001 > 
Primary School
Father's educational status
(9.0) 16.2
(6.5) 13.9
(7.4) 29.4
Secondary School
(8.8) 14.6
(6.3) 13.6
(5.3) 29.8
High School
(6.7) 12.0
(5.8) 11.8
(4.7) 31.0
University
(8.5) 14.3
0.234
(6.2) 13.0
0.142
(5.6) 30.1
0.015
Married
Marital status
(12.2) 18.6
(7.7) 15.6
(7.1) 26.2
Divorce / death of father
(7.7) 13.3
0.013
(6.3) 12.6
0.135
(5.0) 30.8
0.012
Girl
Child 's gender
(9.6) 15.8
(6.3) 13.6
(6.3) 29.1
Boy
(7.1) 12.7
0.004
(6.2) 13.2
0.148
(5.2) 30.2
0.019
1
Number of children
(9.1) 15.2
(6.3) 12.7
(5.8) 30.3
2
(11.1) 18.2
(6.4) 15.1
(7.2) 27.1
3 ≤ 
(8.30) 14.2
0.014
(6.3) 13.4
0.056
(5.4) 30.0
0.009
First
Child 's birth rank
(8.7) 14.2
(6.2) 12.0
(6.1) 30.6
Second
(11.5) 20.3
(6.2) 15.6
(6.8) 26.1
Third or fourth
(8.9) 15.7
0.001 > 
(6.6) 13.7
0.196
(6.4) 29.2
0.042
Public School
Type of school (n = 195)
(7.4) 11.0
(5.8) 12.3
(4.9) 31.0
Private School
(8.2) 16.4
0.006
(6.4) 14.4
0.575
(7.5) 28.6
0.009
Weak / Medium
Child's educational status (n = 195)
(10.3) 16.7
(6.7) 13.6
(6.4) 28.1
Good
(7.3) 12.6
(6.3) 12.9
(5.2) 30.9
Excellent
(8.8) 14.5
0.975
(6.3) 13.1
0.972
(5.7) 30.2
0.142
City
Living place
(7.1) 14.4
(6.8) 13.2
(6.4) 26.2
Village
(12.1) 23.7
0.001 > 
(5.2) 17.4
0.002
(8.1) 24.6
0.001 > 
Bad
Financial status
(8.3) 14.6
(6.6) 12.4
(5.8) 30.3
medium
(7.5) 12.7
(5.8) 13.2
(4.7) 30.5
Good
(8.1) 13.5
0.011
(6.3) 12.9
0.867
(5.4) 30.4
0.019
Gilak
Mother's ethnicity
(6.8) 15.2
(7.0) 13.1
(6.8) 29.1
Talesh
(10.9) 18.0
(6.0) 13.8
(6.2) 27.9
Turkish
(9.3) 14.5
(6.6) 13.0
(5.9) 31.5
Other
(7.9) 13.6
0.003
(6.4) 13.2
0.602
(5.3) 30.4
0.036
Gilak
Father's ethnicity
(6.8) 13.1
(5.8) 11.8
(5.4) 30.8
Talesh
(10.8) 18.4
(6.0) 13.7
(6.7) 27.9
Turkish
(9.7) 15.0
(6.6) 12.6
(6.6) 30.1
Other
(8.6) 14.2
0.006
(6.2) 12.9
0.011
(5.6) 30.2
0.002
Yes
Mother’s Supervision on the child’s use of technology and mobile phones
(10.5) 20.7
(7.7) 17.3
(7.1) 25.2
No
(4.8) 10.3
0.001 > 
(5.6) 12.3
0.379
(4.0) 32.6
0.001 > 
Yes
Mothers’ participation in sex education training
(9.1) 15.2
(6.4) 13.2
(5.9) 29.5
No
(9.4) 19.7
0.001 > 
(6.1) 16.3
0.001 > 
(6.2) 26.4
0.001 > 
None
Source of mother’s information
(7.5) 12.9
(6.1) 11.8
(5.4) 30.9
Internet, books, television
(11.1) 18.6
(6.6) 14.9
(5.4) 29.1
Friends
(4.2) 9.7
(4.9) 12.1
(4.0) 32.5
Field of Study
one-way ANOVA, Independent T-test, Pearson Correlation Coefficient
There were significant correlations between strict and permissive sex education styles and low parenting educational levels, third and fourth children, low-income family finances, lack of sex education information resources, and absence of mothers' supervision on how children use technology and cell phones (p < 0.05). There was a significant relationship between strict sex education style with having a son, attending public school, not attending sex education courses, and the parents' Turkish ethnicity (Turkish-speaking parents) (p < 0.05) (Table 3).
In multiple linear regression, according to the multivariate analysis, the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.406, which indicates that 40.6% of the changes in strict style scores were explained by the personal characteristics of the parents, the child, and the socio-familial characteristics (Table 4).
Table 4
The results of multiple linear regression analysis for factors related to Strict Sex Education Style (n = 306)
b
SE
β
T
P*
Variables
b
SE
β
T
P*
Variables
b
SE
β
T
P*
Variables
-2.40
3.52
-0.04
-0.68
0.496
Yes
Stepfather
    
Ref
Gilak
Father's ethnicity
0.02
0.24
0.01
0.10
0.923
Child’s age
0.32
0.32
0.24
1.00
0.318
Mother’s age
    
Ref
No
-2.34
2.26
-0.08
1.03
0.302
Talesh
-0.54
0.31
-0.42
-1.76
0.080
Father’s age
-10.99
5.17
-0.12
-2.13
0.034
Yes
Stepmother
0.11
1.96
0.01
0.05
0.957
Turkish
0.64
0.32
-0.23
-1.41
0.159
Mother’s marriage age
    
Ref
No
-1
1.85
-0.03
-0.54
0.590
Other
0.49
0.31
0.25
1.60
0.110
Father’s marriage age
-1.68
2.45
-0.04
-0.69
0.493
Yes
Child's exposure to sexual, physical and psychological abuse
    
Ref
Married
Marital status
    
Ref
Primary School
Mother’s educational status
    
Ref
No
4.00
2.49
0.09
1.60
0.110
Divorce /death of father
-8.18
2.34
-0.32
-3.50
0.001
Secondary School
3.69
1.55
0.13
2.38
0.018
I don't know
    
Ref
10 > 
Duration of marriage (year)
-10.36
2.28
-0.57
-4.55
 < 0.001
High School
-4.19
1.25
-0.24
-3.35
0.001
Internet, books, television
Source of mother's information
-0.49
1.38
-0.03
-0.36
0.720
10_15
-9.82
2.55
-0.56
-3.85
 < 0.001
University
2.09
1.97
0.10
1.06
0.289
15_20
    
Ref
Primary School
Father’s educational status
0.72
2.76
0.03
0.26
0.793
20 < 
-3.03
1.85
-0.13
-1.64
0.103
Secondary School
0.63
1.79
0.02
0.35
0.728
Friends
-5.18
2.10
-0.18
-2.44
0.016
Field of Study
    
Ref
1
Number of children
-2.11
1.96
-0.11
-1.08
0.282
High School
    
Ref
None
2.67
1.19
0.15
2.25
0.26
2
-3.02
2.20
-0.17
-1.37
0.171
University
    
Ref
City
Living place
1.90
2.65
0.06
0.72
0.474
3 ≤ 
    
Ref
Housekeeper
Mother’s job
0.96
3.56
0.01
0.27
0.787
Village
-2.74
1.39
-0.11
-1.97
0.050
Yes
Mothers’ participation in sex education training
-2.59
1.98
-0.07
-1.31
0.191
Self-employment
    
Ref
Bad
Financial status
    
Ref
No
1.67
1.82
0.06
0.92
0.359
Office Employed
-3.05
1.95
-0.17
-1.56
0.120
Medium
    
Ref
Girl
Child gender
-1.35
1.94
-0.05
-0.70
0.486
Medical field
-2.93
2.11
-0.16
-1.39
0.166
Good
1.95
0.89
0.11
2.19
0.03
Boy
2.422
2.60
0.05
0.93
0.353
Other
       
-0.12
0.97
-0.01
-0.13
0.901
Yes
Kindergarten attendance experience
    
Ref
Self-employment
Father’s Job
    
Ref
No
-0.17
1.23
-0.01
-0.14
0.893
Office Employed
-0.53
1.37
-0.02
-0.39
0.698
Worker
-3.18
2.24
-0.08
-1.42
0.156
Yes
Mother's Supervision on the child's use of technology and mobile phones
-0.39
2.32
-0.01
-0.17
0.866
Medical field
    
Ref
No
    
Ref
Gilak
Mother's ethnicity
    
Ref
First
Child’s birth rank
3.16
2.19
0.10
1.44
0.150
Talesh
-1.59
1.40
-0.08
-1.13
0.258
Second
-1.02
1.96
-0.04
-0.52
0.602
Turkish
-0.35
3.47
-0.01
-0.10
0.920
Third or fourth
2.85
2.05
0.09
1.39
0.167
Other
B Regression coefficient, SE Standard Error; R2: 0.406; * Linear regression analysis
In relation to the permissive sex education style, the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.327, which indicates 32.7% of the changes in this style were explained by the personal characteristics of the participants (Table 5). In the authoritative sex education style, R2 = 0.361 showed that 36.1 of the changes were explained by the personal characteristics of the study participants (Table 6).
Table 5
The results of multiple linear regression analysis for factors related to permissive Sex Education Style
b
SE
β
T
P*
Variables
0.14
0.18
0.06
0.76
0.451
Child’s age
0.12
0.25
0.12
0.47
0.639
Mother’s age
-0.20
0.24
-0.21
-0.82
0.410
Father’s age
0.01
0.25
0.01
0.02
0.986
Mother’s marriage age
0.17
0.24
0.12
0.71
0.481
Father’s marriage age
    
Ref
Primary School
Mother’s educational status
-3.01
1.79
-0.16
-1.68
0.094
Secondary School
-2.95
1.75
-0.22
-1.69
0.92
High School
-2.42
1.96
-0.19
-1.24
0.217
University
    
Ref
Primary School
Father’s educational status
1.03
1.42
-0.06
-0.73
0.468
Secondary School
-0.82
1.51
-0.06
-0.54
0.586
High School
-2.76
1.69
-0.22
1.63
0.103
University
    
Ref
Housekeeper
Mother’s job
-2.77
1.52
-0.10
-1.82
0.069
Self-employment
-2.30
1.40
-0.11
-1.64
0.102
Office Employed
-2.06
1.49
-0.11
-1.38
0.168
Medical field
1.26
2.00
0.04
0.63
0.528
Other
    
Ref
Self-employment
Father’s Job
-0.22
0.94
-0.02
-0.24
0.813
Office Employed
-2.17
1.05
-0.13
-2.06
0.040
Worker
0.24
1.78
0.01
0.14
0.892
Medical field
    
Ref
1
Number of children
-0.43
0.91
-0.03
-0.47
0.640
2
0.48
2.04
0.02
0.23
0.815
3 ≤ 
    
Ref
Married
Marital status
1.46
1.91
0.05
1.76
0.447
Divorce /death of father
    
Ref
10 > 
Duration of marriage (year)
-0.60
1.06
-0.05
-0.57
0.571
10_15
-0.74
1.51
-0.05
-0.49
0.625
15_20
1.31
2.12
0.07
0.62
0.537
20 < 
    
Ref
Girl
Child gender
1.45
0.68
0.12
2.13
0.035
Boy
B Regression coefficient, SE Standard Error; R2.: 0.327; * Linear regression analysis
Table 6
The results of multiple linear regression analysis for factors related to authoritative Sex Education Style (n = 306)
b
SE
β
T
P*
Variables
b
SE
β
T
P*
Variables
b
SE
β
T
P*
Variables
1.65
2.41
0.04
0.69
0.493
Yes
Stepfather
    
Ref
Gilak
Father's ethnicity
-0.12
0.16
-0.05
-0.72
0.471
Child’s age
0.25
0.22
0.28
1.15
0.253
Mother’s age
    
Ref
No
1.94
1.55
0.10
1.26
0.211
Talesh
-0.07
0.21
-0.09
-0.35
0.725
Father’s age
3.64
3.53
0.06
1.03
0.304
Yes
Stepmother
-0.88
1.34
-0.06
-0.66
0.512
Turkish
-0.30
0.22
-0.23
-1.34
1.82
Mother’s marriage age
    
Ref
No
0.84
1.26
0.04
0.66
0.508
Other
0.08
0.21
0.06
0.38
0.705
Father’s marriage age
-2.51
1.68
-0.08
-1.50
0.135
Yes
Child's exposure to sexual, physical and psychological abuse
    
Ref
Married
Marital status
    
Ref
Primary School
Mother’s educational status
    
Ref
No
-2.96
1.71
-0.10
-1.73
0.084
Divorce /death of father
3.74
1.60
0.22
2.34
0.020
Secondary School
-3.24
1.06
-0.17
-3.06
0.002
I don't know
    
Ref
10 > 
Duration of marriage (year)
3.79
1.56
0.31
2.44
0.016
High School
3.67
0.85
0.31
4.29
 < 0.001
Internet, books, television
Source of mother's information
-0.62
0.94
-0.05
-0.66
0.508
10_15
2.70
1.74
0.23
1.55
0.123
University
-2.66
1.34
-0.19
-1.98
0.049
15_20
    
Ref
Primary School
Father’s educational status
-4.13
1.89
-0.25
-2.19
0.030
20 < 
0.60
1.27
0.04
0.48
0.634
Secondary School
2.91
1.23
0.15
2.38
0.018
Friends
5.30
1.44
0.29
3.69
 < 0.001
Field of Study
    
Ref
1
Number of children
-0.14
1.34
-0.01
-0.10
0.918
High School
    
Ref
None
0.84
0.81
0.07
1.03
0.304
2
0.29
1.50
0.030
0.19
0.846
University
    
Ref
Bad
Financial status
-0.12
1.81
-0.01
-0.06
0.949
3 ≤ 
    
Ref
Housekeeper
Mother’s job
3.28
1.34
0.28
2.46
0.015
Medium
2.13
0.95
0.13
2.24
0.026
Yes
Mothers’ participation in sex education training
2.59
1.35
0.11
1.92
0.056
Self-employment
2.88
1.44
0.25
1.99
0.047
Good
     
Ref
No
1.46
1.25
0.08
1.17
0.241
Office Employed
           
Ref
Girl
Child gender
0.95
1.32
0.05
0.72
0.473
Medical field
-1.26
0.61
-0.11
-2.07
0.04
Boy
-0.41
1.78
-0.01
-0.23
0.816
Other
    
Ref
City
Living place
    
Ref
Self-employment
Father’s Job
-4.32
2.44
-0.10
-1.77
0.078
Village
-0.32
0.84
-0.03
-0.38
0.702
Office Employed
1.15
0.94
0.07
1.23
0.219
Worker
2.38
1.53
0.09
1.56
0.121
Yes
Mother's Supervision on the child's use of technology and mobile phones
0.22
1.59
0.01
0.14
0.890
Medical field
    
Ref
No
    
Ref
Gilak
Mother's ethnicity
    
Ref
First
Child 's birth rank
-2.91
1.50
-0.14
-1.94
0.053
Talesh
0.80
0.96
0.06
0.84
0.404
Second
-0.02
1.34
-0.01
-0.02
0.988
Turkish
-0.60
2.37
-0.02
-0.25
0.802
Third or fourth
0.53
1.40
0.02
0.37
0.709
Other
B: Regression coefficient; SE: Standard Error; R2:0.361; * Linear regression

Discussion

In the current study, the majority of Iranian mothers followed the authoritative sex education style. This result is consistent with the study of Shin et al. [2] and Binti Abdullah et al. [10]. While it is inconsistent with the study of Nasution et al., that reported mothers with strict views considered sex education taboo and believed that society considered issues related to sex education as abnormal and, therefore, their embarrassment senses prevented them from adequately teaching their children [11]. In the other study by Merghati-Khoei et al. In Iran, parents believed that children could be protected by strict sex education, which is inconsistent with the results of the current study [12]. Therefore, in a strict sex education style, parents have a closed view of the sex education of their children. Such cases may be associated with negative consequences such as future behavioral and moral deviations of the children [3]. These differences may be due to culture and beliefs that are different even between people of one nation.
The results showed in the parents with higher education levels, the score of authoritative sex education style increased significantly, but the scores of strict and permissive styles decreased significantly. The higher educated mothers that had an authoritative style also reported that their source of information about sex education was their field of study, but the participants in both strict and permissive sex education styles did not use any information source. Along with the present study, we can mention the studies of Vaghari et al. [13] and Faizah et al. [14]. Advanced personal knowledge and general information can affect personal thinking, attitudes, and perceptions [13].
In a study by Martin et al., Higher educated mothers showed a better attitude toward their children's sex education, while less-educated mothers showed a more closed or even more permissive attitude towards their children's sex education [15].
According to the results, mothers who followed the authoritative style of sex education had a higher socioeconomic level than the two strict and permissive styles, which means that they were in a better financial condition and their child was in a lower birth rank. The majority of these mothers lived with their spouses and had better control over their children's technology and mobile phone use. The study findings of Asuquo et al. [16] in Nigeria is consistent with the findings of the present study.
In contrast to the current study, Devi and Yadav showed no significant correlation between the sex education style of rural parents and the family's financial status [17].
This difference seems to be related to cultural differences between urban and rural communities. Work diversity may be less in rural areas than in urban areas. In general, rural parents have a stronger taboo on sex education and related topics and may have much less access to public resources on sex education [18].
This study indicated that mothers who followed an authoritative sex education style had more control over their children's technology and mobile phone use. A study by Keikha et al. [19] is consistent with this finding. In the study of Ihmeideh and Shawareb, parents who had a strict style set hard rules for their children to use the Internet. They punished their children for connecting to social media [20].
In this study, mothers with an authoritative style had fewer children than mothers with a strict style. In the majority of these mothers, the children under study were daughters who were under education in private (non-public) schools. They were the first child of their family. Also, most of these mothers had participated in sex education training.
A study by Zedan et al. showed that the more children a family has, the less care, support, and encouragement they have [21] which is in line with the present study. One of the inconsistent results is the study of Sourinejad et al. that indicated mothers with two or more children have higher authoritative style scores than single mothers [22]. Attitudes and expectations of parents change through the experience of the first child.
Parental behavior with the first child seems different from the next child. Of course, if the family's financial status is complicated, parents may have limited time to meet the educational needs of all their children, and many school-aged children may start working to support the family's financial situation. This issue reduces family oversight and support for children [23].
According to the results of this study, most mothers that had one son followed a strict style of sex education, while mothers with one daughter followed an authoritative style.
Regarding the authoritative style of sex education in the participants and the gender of their children, Purwanti et al. showed that parents have a deeper relationship with their daughters than their sons when they educate their children, which is consistent with current studies [24]. However, Sharifi et al. reported that a strict sex education style is more common among parents with daughters than mothers with sons [25] which is inconsistent with the current study. This indicates that Iranian families with girl children have more concern about the sex education of their children.
Comparing two strict and authoritative styles showed that the majority of children that had mothers with authoritative and strict styles were educated in private schools (non-public) and public schools respectively. In this regard, a study by Qarebaghi et al. found that most mothers with children in public schools adhered to a strict sex educational style [26]. In contrast to the current study, McKay et al. showed that there was not much difference in the type of answers given about sex education between students' parents in public and private (non-public) schools. They showed that parents whose children attending in Catholic schools have shown a stricter attitude towards sex education, but actually, there was no difference between the parents of public and Catholic schools [27].
Comparing the two strict and the authoritative styles, we found that mothers with the authoritative styles had more participation in the sex education classes and had more information than the others. Mothers who followed a strict or permissive sex education style had less information on issues related to their child's exposure to sexual abuse and harassment. Consistent with the current study in the study by Lo et al. the parents who had authoritative educational views were more aware of the sex education of children and various types of child abuse than other views [28]. In their study, Khanjari et al. found that 20% of mothers had a permissive sex education style [29].
According to the results, a significant association was observed between authoritative style and marital status and most authoritative mothers lived with their husbands. Regarding the study of Jamaluddin which was along with the present study, the divorced parents had a lower level of knowledge about sex education of their children than the married parents [24].
Rosenkrantz and Houston concluded that mothers living alone for some reason are more violent and somewhat stricter than their children [30].
This study has some limitations including the cross-sectional design and self-report responses.
Since this study was conducted during the pandemic of COVID-19, various factors, including social distance, may have reduced the tendency of mothers to stay longer in comprehensive health service centers, affecting the accuracy of answering questions. The results of this study and the participants’ attitudes may also be influenced by Iran's Islamic culture and the related teachings about the limitations of relationships between the opposite genders.

Conclusion

According to the results, the authoritative style was reported as a dominant sex education style in parents who participated in this study. Also, the child's gender, type of school, parent's educational status, marital status, number of children, child's birth rank, parent's educational status, financial status, ethnicity, parent’s supervision on the child's technology use, parent’s participation in sex education training, and Source of parent's information were the related factors with the type of the sex education style. Since parents' sex education styles are the most important factors in shaping children's personalities, ensuring family health, and promoting community health, therefore, we recommend nursing managers and policymakers to identify other types of child sex education styles and the factors associated with different communities because it can change greatly under the influence of the different cultures. Since the role of pediatrics’ nurses is to promote health in all three levels of prevention, they are the most suitable people to evaluate and identify this important issue at the community level. This will be made possible by promoting evidence-based practices in sex education and repeating the research in different communities. Identifying the inappropriate and harmful styles of sexual education of children by their mothers, which often occurs due to their lack of awareness, health policymakers can prevent the consequences of this by supporting the implementation of specialized educational and counseling interventions for parents. Ensuring healthy sexual development in children can have an impact on the health of society.

Acknowledgements

The authors express their thanks to the Deputy of Research and Technology of Guilan University of Medical Sciences for the financial support. Also, we thank wish to thank all the participating Mothers.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
The research was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, under opinion No. IR.GUMS. REC.1399.544. All participants provided informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Also, all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines of the journal. They were guaranteed the right to withdraw from the research at any time and the confidentiality of their personal information.
Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdollahzadeh H, Keykhosravi S. Construction and Psychometric Characteristics of the Parental Sexual Education Styles Questionnaire. J Res Behav Sci. 2020;17(4):580–93. [Persian]. Abdollahzadeh H, Keykhosravi S. Construction and Psychometric Characteristics of the Parental Sexual Education Styles Questionnaire. J Res Behav Sci. 2020;17(4):580–93. [Persian].
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Moussa MB. Parenting influences on adolescent risky behaviors: How much do parents matter? : Western Carolina University; 2016. Moussa MB. Parenting influences on adolescent risky behaviors: How much do parents matter? : Western Carolina University; 2016.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Merghati-Khoei E, Atoof F, Sheikhan F, Omati S, Aghajani N, Hosseinzadeh M. Assessing Iranians’ parental competence: Development and psychometric properties of the Children’s Sexual Behavior Questionnaire (CSBQ-IR), Iranian Version. Health Promot Perspect. 2019;9(2):131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-02018-6. Merghati-Khoei E, Atoof F, Sheikhan F, Omati S, Aghajani N, Hosseinzadeh M. Assessing Iranians’ parental competence: Development and psychometric properties of the Children’s Sexual Behavior Questionnaire (CSBQ-IR), Iranian Version. Health Promot Perspect. 2019;9(2):131. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10508-013-02018-6.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hockenberry M, Wilson D. Wong’s nursing care of infants and children. USA: Elsevier Health Sci; 2015. Hockenberry M, Wilson D. Wong’s nursing care of infants and children. USA: Elsevier Health Sci; 2015.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Veghari Z, Hejazi Z. A study of parents' attitudes and actions towards their children's sexual education. . Ninth National Conference on Enlightenment, Pure Thought, Family and Sex Education; Mashhad2015. p. p.343–60. [persian]. Veghari Z, Hejazi Z. A study of parents' attitudes and actions towards their children's sexual education. . Ninth National Conference on Enlightenment, Pure Thought, Family and Sex Education; Mashhad2015. p. p.343–60. [persian].
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Asuquo E, Imaledo J, Ayalogu P, Ibe C, Okojie E, Efere K. Attitude, practice and perception of sexuality education among parents in Obio-Akpor local government area of Rivers State. Nigeria Afr J Biomed Res. 2019;22(1):51–8. Asuquo E, Imaledo J, Ayalogu P, Ibe C, Okojie E, Efere K. Attitude, practice and perception of sexuality education among parents in Obio-Akpor local government area of Rivers State. Nigeria Afr J Biomed Res. 2019;22(1):51–8.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Keikha M, Mortazavi J, Kian M. Perceptions and Lived Experiences of Primary School Students about Social Networks and Cyber Space Contex. International Conference on Psychopathological Culture and Education; Tehran2017. [Persian]. Keikha M, Mortazavi J, Kian M. Perceptions and Lived Experiences of Primary School Students about Social Networks and Cyber Space Contex. International Conference on Psychopathological Culture and Education; Tehran2017. [Persian].
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Zedan RF. Parent involvement according to education level, socio-economic situation, and number of family members. J Educ Enq. 2011;11(1):13–28. Zedan RF. Parent involvement according to education level, socio-economic situation, and number of family members. J Educ Enq. 2011;11(1):13–28.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sourinejad H, Reisi Dehkordi Z, Kohan S, Shams M, Adibmoghaddam E. Comparison of Parenting Style and Mental Health in Single-child and Multiple-children Mothers in Isfahan, Iran. Sci J Nurs, Midwifery and Paramed Fac. 2020;5(4):62–71. [Persian]. Sourinejad H, Reisi Dehkordi Z, Kohan S, Shams M, Adibmoghaddam E. Comparison of Parenting Style and Mental Health in Single-child and Multiple-children Mothers in Isfahan, Iran. Sci J Nurs, Midwifery and Paramed Fac. 2020;5(4):62–71. [Persian].
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharifi M, Arman S, Abdoli S, Fard AHBP, Kohan S. Iranian parents’ experiences about children sexual training: Control, restriction and education. Int J Med Res & Health Sci. 2016;5(11):376–85.[persian]. Sharifi M, Arman S, Abdoli S, Fard AHBP, Kohan S. Iranian parents’ experiences about children sexual training: Control, restriction and education. Int J Med Res & Health Sci. 2016;5(11):376–85.[persian].
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gharebaghi R, Taghi loo S, Abbaspoor A. Comparison of parenting styles and social development of public and non-public school students. J Fam Res. 2019;15(4):67–84. [Persian]. Gharebaghi R, Taghi loo S, Abbaspoor A. Comparison of parenting styles and social development of public and non-public school students. J Fam Res. 2019;15(4):67–84. [Persian].
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Khanjari S, Modabber M, Rahmati M, Haghani H. Knowledge, attitudes and practices among parents of school-age children after child sexual abuse prevention education. Iran J Nurs. 2017;29(104):17–27. [Persian]. Khanjari S, Modabber M, Rahmati M, Haghani H. Knowledge, attitudes and practices among parents of school-age children after child sexual abuse prevention education. Iran J Nurs. 2017;29(104):17–27. [Persian].
Metadaten
Titel
Approaches and styles of mothers in sex education process of children and the related factors
verfasst von
Elnaz Faraji Nesfechi
Moluk Pouralizadeh
Zahra Bostani Khalesi
Saman Maroufizadeh
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2023
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01410-w