Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Research

Applying team-based learning combined with empathy map to improve self-directed learning skills

verfasst von: Miao-Chuan Chen, Mei-Chu Tsai

Erschienen in: BMC Nursing | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Background

Lifelong learning is essential for cultivating conscientious nurses. Because self-directed learning is significantly correlated with lifelong learning, it is necessary to enhance nursing students’ self-directed learning skills after graduation. This study examined the effectiveness of an integrated team-based learning and empathy mapping teaching strategy in a Psychiatric Nursing course for enhancing students’ self-directed learning skills and academic performance.

Methods

A quasi-experimental design was used. The subjects of the study were 89 third-year nursing students who enrolled in a course on Psychiatric Nursing. Data were collected from September 22, 2021 to January 31, 2022. The participants were recruited using purposive sampling and divided into experimental group and control group. The pre- and post-test learning outcomes of nursing students were evaluated with the Self-Directed Learning Instrument (SDLI).

Results

The experimental group performed significantly better than the control group on the dimensions of “identifying learning resources,” “monitoring learning progress,” and “interpersonal communication,” (p < .05) as revealed by the results. Additionally, the students enhanced their self-directed learning skills (p = .038) and academic performance (p < .001).

Conclusions

The integrated team-based learning and empathy mapping teaching strategy significantly enhanced the self-directed learning skills and academic performance of nursing students.
Hinweise

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background

Self-directed learning (SDL) is a crucial skill for upcoming graduates and is essential to nursing students’ professional development requirements [1, 2]. Academic achievement, learning satisfaction, self-evaluations, and professional nursing values are more likely to improve for first-year nursing students with stronger SDL skills [3, 4]. Therefore, appropriate teaching strategies should be implemented in educational settings to foster students’ learning responsibility and improve their SDL abilities. Team-based learning (TBL) has been prevalent in domestic and international professional healthcare education research for several years. Over 80% of these studies focused on the learning outcomes of students [5]. TBL is used to teach students to be accountable for their own learning and to instill them with SDL skills. Research demonstrates that TBL effectively improves the problem-solving and SDL skills of nursing students [6, 7], and its combination with flipped learning increases students’ engagement with lessons [8]. Students who received TBL performed better academically and were able to retain their knowledge longer than those who received traditional learning [9].
Knowles defined SDL as a process in which learners take the initiative and responsibility to identify their learning needs, goals, strategies, resources, and assessment methods, as well as having larger and more resolute motivations to apply what they’ve learned in their daily lives [10]. Loeng characterized SDL as a multidimensional concept in which the learner controls the status of their own learning activities with minimal assistance from others. In other words, SDL requires learners to be proactive and accountable for their own learning [11]. SDL should be viewed as a collaboration between teachers and students [12], and teachers should be learning promoters rather than communicators [11]. Lifelong learning is essential for developing responsible and autonomous nurses. Nurse preceptors should implement instructional strategies that foster SDL and lifelong learning skills in their students [13]. However, under the traditional framework for instruction, nursing students continue to rely on instructors and are unable to engage in SDL. Dialogic learning should be utilized to help students reflect on and deepen their comprehension of their own values [14].
Larry Michaelsen created team-based learning (TBL) in the late 1970s to facilitate small-group discussions in large classes. TBL improves students’ critical thinking, teamwork, and disciplinary knowledge comprehension and application [15]. In TBL, students first complete a learning assignment and then take a test to evaluate their basic learning outcome. The purpose of this study is to improve their foundational knowledge and readiness for advanced group projects. During team assessments, students deliberate and reach a consensus. They can also ask questions to interact with their peers and teacher, enhancing their sense of responsibility toward their team and their ability to participate in group discussions and communication [15]. TBL courses enhance the problem-solving abilities, SDL, and knowledge of nursing students [7]. Following the implementation of TBL in a fundamentals of nursing course, Kim found that students’ learning attitudes, motivations, and problem-solving skills improved [16]. A TBL course design also effectively improved the SDL skills of medical students [6]. In a psychiatric nursing curriculum, Park and Park combined TBL and flipped learning [8]. The results demonstrated that the students readily integrated diverse viewpoints through teamwork and were engaged in the lessons. The teacher acted as a facilitator who guided students to engage in SDL and enjoyable lesson immersion. Switching from teacher-centered to group-based learning activities increased the nursing students’ self-management, teamwork, and SDL skills [17].
Dave Gray developed the empathy map to help designers overcome their egocentric tendencies by analyzing and considering the user’s perspective [18]. By observing a user’s actual service experiences and opinions, this instrument enables designers to illustrate the needs of different customer groups [19]. An empathy map helps a designer consider the viewpoint of another individual. It is utilized frequently in group-based design thinking but infrequently in medical education. The only instance was when Cairns et al. incorporated empathy maps into a medical student communication skills training program [20]. The results revealed that the students’ perspectives on empathy and patient-centered care were influenced by empathy maps. Empathy maps are a cost-effective way to promote empathy and patient-centered care in medical education and other care-related professions.
Nurses must establish trustworthy nursing relationships with patients with mental disorders in order to gain an in-depth understanding of the patient’s inner world. Due to the lack of breadth and depth in their life experiences, it is difficult for nursing students to develop empathy, and traditional teaching approaches offer no assistance in meeting their needs in the affective component of learning [21]. An empathy map is a tool that assists a person to understand the perspective of others, and is therefore feasible for preliminary case analysis or empathy training [18]. And incorporating empathy into classroom instruction promotes teamwork and proactive collaboration among students [19]. Attempting to switch from teacher-centered to group-based learning activities should not only increase the teamwork spirit of nursing students, but should also be quite effective in improving SDL skills. Therefore, this study applied a method combining team-based learning and empathy mapping in a psychiatric nursing course to examine its effectiveness in improving nursing students’ SDL skills and academic performance.

Methods

Study design

This study utilized a quasi-experimental design to examine differences in the SDL skills and academic performance of nursing students following the implementation of TBL and empathy mapping.

Participants

The participants were 89 conveniently sampled third-year nursing students who were clustered and randomly assigned into an experimental group (44) and a control group (45). All the participants were given a consent form and none of them had any psychiatric nursing experience.

Curriculum design

The TBL method was incorporated into the compulsory Psychiatric Nursing course. Before engaging in TBL, the experimental group analyzed and interpreted the perceptions of a case through empathy mapping. According to Hawkins [22], there are three stages of TBL: (1) Preparation: Four students were assigned to a learning group and given pre-lesson learning materials; (2) Readiness Assurance: At the beginning of the lesson, an evaluation consisting of 15 to 20 multiple-choice questions was administered to determine whether the students had sufficiently prepared their pre-learning contents. Students completed the same evaluation individually and then as a group, deliberating and discussing until they reached a consensus. This allowed them to evaluate their pre-lesson preparations and provide clear feedback to the instructor via appeals and justifications; (3) Application Exercise: The instructor devised one or two scenarios for the group to discuss in small groups. In the third stage of TBL, the experimental group was introduced to empathy mapping, where they were required to re-answer and re-discuss questions after understanding the context of a clinical case. By observing what the case sees, says, does, and hears, the students were able to comprehend what the case thinks and feels and devise appropriate caregiving solutions and professional decisions.

Research instruments

The pre- and post-test learning outcomes of nursing students were evaluated with the Self-Directed Learning Instrument (SDLI) developed by Cheng et al., which is a valid measure of nursing students’ SDL skills [23]. The SDLI consists of twenty items distributed across four dimensions: learning motivations, planning and implementation, self-monitoring, and interpersonal communication. The items are scored on a five-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree), with a total score range between 20 and 100 points. A higher score indicates that a student’s SDL skills are more developed. original scale had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.92 and the constructs’ reliabilities ranged from 0.77 to 0.86. The good model fit derived from confirmatory factor analysis reflects the excellent reliability and validity of the scale, thereby strengthening its efficacy as a measure of SDL skills among learners.

Data collection and ethics

The data collection period spanned October 2021 to January 2022 and included both groups’ beginning-of-term and end-of-term information. This study was approved by the institutional review board of a hospital in northern Taiwan (No. 202101323A3). The participants were informed about the details of the study, the data confidentiality, as well as their rights to voluntarily participate or withdraw from the study at any time. All participants were identified using a research code that did not reveal their names, ID numbers, and residential addresses during data analysis.

Results

Analysis of SDL items for both groups

The pre-test results of both groups’ SDL items met the homogeneity requirements. The post-test ANCOVA analysis revealed that the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on six items (Table 1): “I know how to locate learning resources” (p = .018)in the planning and implementation dimension; “I am able to monitor my learning progress” (p = .013)in the self-monitoring dimension; and “My interactions with others assist me to plan my further learning,” (p = .023) “I want to learn the language and culture of those whom I frequently interact with,” (p = .020) “I am able to convey information effectively in spoken form,” (p = .046) and “I am able to convey information effectively in writing” (p = .043)in the interpersonal communication dimension. Thus, the combined application of empathy mapping and TBL had improved the students’ interpersonal communication skills.
Table 1
ANCOVA results for the variables of the experimental and control groups
Group
Experimental group (n = 44)
 
Control group (n = 45)
 
Variable
Pre-test
Post-test
 
Pre-test
Post-test
ANCOVA
M ± SD
M ± SD
 
M ± SD
M ± SD
p
Learning motivations
       
 1. I know what I need to learn.
4.70 ± 0.70
4.91 ± 0.47
 
4.81 ± 0.40
4.70 ± 0.59
0.078
 2. I enjoy learning regardless of the learning outcomes
4.09 ± 0.71
3.98 ± 0.70
 
3.72 ± 1.04
3.74 ± 0.98
0.411
 3. I hope to improve my learning constantly
4.20 ± 0.79
4.07 ± 0.73
 
3.89 ± 0.84
3.87 ± 0.88
0.387
 4. My successes and failures empower me to continue learning.
4.27 ± 0.69
4.18 ± 0.69
 
3.89 ± 1.01
3.98 ± 0.91
0.287
 5. I enjoy solving questions.
4.16 ± 0.75
4.25 ± 0.78
 
4.06 ± 0.82
4.20 ± 0.86
0.958
 6. I do not give up learning when I encounter difficulties
4.05 ± 0.71
3.98 ± 0.79
 
3.91 ± 0.90
3.83 ± 0.85
0.429
Planning and implementation
       
 7. I proactively establish my own learning objectives
4.09 ± 0.80
4.02 ± 0.79
 
3.83 ± 0.92
3.59 ± 1.05
0.051
 8. I know suitable learning strategies for achieving my learning objectives
3.91 ± 0.77
3.95 ± 0.89
 
3.74 ± 0.92
3.83 ± 1.02
0.678
 9. I establish learning priorities
3.98 ± 0.79
4.09 ± 0.86
 
3.72 ± 0.88
3.72 ± 1.03
0.100
 10. I am able to learn according to my own learning plans
3.93 ± 0.80
3.86 ± 0.80
 
3.53 ± 0.97
3.59 ± 0.91
0.186
 11. I am adept in arranging and managing my time for learning
3.64 ± 0.89
3.64 ± 0.94
 
3.36 ± 1.01
3.41 ± 0.93
0.428
 12. I know how to locate learning resources
4.18 ± 0.87
4.05 ± 0.81
 
3.64 ± 0.87
3.63 ± 0.85
0.018*
Self-monitoring
       
 13. I am able to link new knowledge with my experiences
4.18 ± 0.76
4.30 ± 0.73
 
3.87 ± 0.95
3.91 ± 0.89
0.056
 14. I understand my strengths and flaws in learning
4.00 ± 0.89
4.25 ± 0.75
 
4.09 ± 0.83
3.96 ± 0.87
0.150
 15. I am able to monitor my learning progress
3.75 ± 0.78
4.02 ± 0.82
 
3.64 ± 0.92
3.54 ± 0.86
0.013*
 16. I am able to evaluate my learning outcomes
4.05 ± 0.78
4.07 ± 0.82
 
3.77 ± 0.84
3.83 ± 0.82
0.188
Interpersonal communication
       
 17. My interactions with others assist me to plan my further learning
4.09 ± 0.83
4.25 ± 0.75
 
3.96 ± 0.81
3.80 ± 1.02
0.023*
 18. I want to learn the language and culture of those whom I frequently interact with
4.20 ± 0.76
4.34 ± 0.68
 
4.06 ± 0.92
3.91 ± 0.96
0.020*
 19. I am able to convey information effectively in spoken form
3.95 ± 0.78
4.14 ± 0.80
 
3.85 ± 0.88
3.74 ± 0.95
0.046*
 20. I am able to convey information effectively in writing
4.23 ± 0.71
4.14 ± 0.80
 
4.00 ± 0.75
3.76 ± 0.90
0.043*
*p < .05

Analysis of the total SDL scores and academic performances of both groups

The total SDL pre-test scores and midterm academic performances of both groups satisfied the homogeneity requirements (p = .078; p = .155) (Table 2). Regarding post-intervention outcomes, the ANCOVA results of the total SDL scores and end-of-term academic performances of both groups were statistically significant after controlling for the effects of the pre-test score and midterm academic performance (p = .038; p < .001) (Table 3). Following the implementation of the TBL-empathy mapping approach, the SDL skills and academic performance of the experimental group students improved significantly.
Table 2
Analysis of total SDL scores and academic performance of both groups
 
Experimental group
Control group
  
mean
SD
 
mean
SD
t
p
Pre-test
81.63
10.49
 
77.36
12.06
1.783
0.078
Post-test
81.77
9.14
 
76.52
13.75
  
Midterm exam
80.52
9.82
 
83.22
7.96
1.433
0.155
Final exam
83.32
8.25
 
77.00
9.63
  
Table 3
Analysis of the intervention’s effectiveness on the SDL skills and academic performance
     
95% Confidence Interval
B
S.E.
t
p
Lower
Upper
Posttest SDL
      
 Intercept
79.87
8.82
9.06
< 0.001
62.34
97.40
 Experimental group
5.40
2.56
2.11
0.038*
0.32
10.48
 Pretest SDL
-0.04
0.11
-0.39
0.700
-0.26
0.18
Academic performance (end-of-term)
      
 Intercept
36.60
7.19
5.09
< 0.001
22.30
50.89
 Experimental group
-7.88
1.58
-5.01
< 0.001***
-11.01
-4.75
 Midterm performance
0.58
0.09
6.57
< 0.001
0.41
0.76
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001

Discussion

Self-directed learners must be able to assess their individual learning needs, establish learning objectives, identify learning resources, select and implement appropriate learning strategies, and evaluate learning outcomes [24]. This explains why the items “I know how to locate learning resources” (p = .018) and “I am able to monitor my learning progress” (p = .013) were statistically significant in this study. The combination of empathy mapping and TBL significantly facilitated students’ identification of learning resources and progress monitoring. Students are capable of managing their own learning scenarios and activities with minimal assistance from others [11]. Responsibility for one’s own education is essential for lifelong learning. All of the “interpersonal communication” items were statistically significant, indicating that the combined empathy mapping-TBL approach enhanced the students’ interpersonal communication skills. In contrast to our findings, Lee and Park discovered that TBL improved nursing students’ problem-solving, SDL, and nursing knowledge, but had no effect on their communication skills [7]. This difference may be explicable by the combination of empathy mapping utilized in this study. In this study, the use of the Socratic method in classroom debates, group discussions, peer collaboration, and question posing enhanced students’ communication and peer collaboration skills [13].
This study incorporated TBL into classroom instruction. Numerous studies have demonstrated that TBL has significant and positive effects on students’ SDL skills [6, 7, 16, 17, 24]. In this study, empathy mapping was incorporated into the third stage of the TBL instructional plan, and the results demonstrated that the experimental group improved their SDL skills more effectively than the control group. This finding can be attributed to the core concept of empathy mapping, which emphasizes understanding a patient’s emotions and sensing their problems and challenges. In doing so, students improved their SDL abilities. SDL is effective in developing a person’s competencies, attitudes, and literacy, as demonstrated by both research and practice. Through SDL, nursing students continuously develop their learning competencies and acquire the required expertise [13]. Huh and Oh argued that identifying patients’ problems through direct nurse-patient interactions in clinical practice and providing the necessary education to the patient are essential for enhancing nursing students’ empathy, communication effectiveness, and SDL skills [25]. However, for third-year nursing students who lack clinical experience, the combination of empathy mapping and TBL is an effective instructional technique for enhancing their SDL skills.
In addition, the experimental group significantly improved their academic performance compared to the control group, suggesting a correlation between better academic performance and a positive self-evaluation of SDL skills among nursing students [4, 26]. Slater and Cusick discovered that the learning outcomes of first-year nursing students were correlated with their SDL skills, i.e., students with successful achievements had significantly higher SDL skills [27]. This finding is consistent with Knowles’ hypothesis that active learners learn more efficiently and effectively than passive learners [10]. Both empathy mapping and TBL are based on small group learning, indicating that a learning environment characterized by mutual support in small groups was conducive to the enhancement of students’ learning competencies [1, 2].
Based on Grow’s staged SDL model, this course completed the first three stages of SDL and assisted students in completing the fourth stage independently [28]. In Stage 1, students are teacher-dependent learners. Teachers should refrain from expressing their opinions, and learning topics, not students, should take precedence. Thus, the first step of TBL is to provide students with the opportunity to complete individual assessments based on the assigned instructional materials. In Stage 2, students appropriately direct their own learning, with teachers serving as guides and facilitators. As learners are generally uninformed about a topic, learning exchanges should be two-way so that students can share their responses and interests.
The second stage also includes small-group tests in which students pose and discuss questions with the instructor and their classmates, thereby enhancing their team responsibility and communication skills. Stage 3 of the SDL is the transitional phase. Teachers serve as facilitators to encourage student participation in seminars and small group discussions.
The incorporation of empathy mapping in Stage 3 enabled students to comprehend how the case thinks and feels based on what they see, say, do, and hear, and to develop appropriate caregiving strategies and professional decisions.
In Stage 4, students are highly self-directed and teachers are merely consultants who aid in the development of students’ learning skills. By establishing their own objectives and standards for learning, students willingly assume responsibility for their academic progress.

Conclusion

This study employed a combined TBL and empathy mapping teaching strategy that inverts traditional professional course learning models, allowing students to integrate the affective component of learning with their acquired knowledge. The results of the ANCOVA indicated that the experimental group improved their SDL skills significantly more than the control group. In other words, the combined TBL and empathy mapping instructional strategy significantly improved nursing students’ SDL skills.
Empathy prioritizes considering the viewpoints of others. Through empathy, the students were able to comprehend the true emotions and perspectives of a case, and their problem-solving initiative inspired them to study. Students of nursing who can accurately identify a patient’s opinions and emotions are better able to provide care-related recommendations that the patient requires and demonstrate professional nursing literacy. In this study, the combination of empathy mapping and TBL demonstrated that the introduction of empathy mapping significantly improved students’ SDL skills, thereby validating the approach’s applicability in contemporary professional nursing education settings.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere appreciation and gratitude to the students who participated in this study.

Declarations

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Chang Gung Medical Foundation (No. 202101323A3) in Taiwan. Prior to conducting the study, informed consent was taken from the participants. All methods in this study were carried out in accordance with all guidelines and regulations.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Visiers-Jiménez L, Palese A, Brugnolli A, Cadorin L, Salminen L, Leino‐Kilpi H, Löyttyniemi E, Nemcová J, Simão de Oliveira C, Rua M, Zeleníková R, Kajander‐Unkuri S. Nursing students’ self-directed learning abilities and related factors at graduation: a multi-country cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2022;9(3):1688–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1193.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Visiers-Jiménez L, Palese A, Brugnolli A, Cadorin L, Salminen L, Leino‐Kilpi H, Löyttyniemi E, Nemcová J, Simão de Oliveira C, Rua M, Zeleníková R, Kajander‐Unkuri S. Nursing students’ self-directed learning abilities and related factors at graduation: a multi-country cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2022;9(3):1688–99. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​nop2.​1193.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Knowles MS. Self-directed learning: a guide for Learners and teachers. New York: Association; 1975. Knowles MS. Self-directed learning: a guide for Learners and teachers. New York: Association; 1975.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Regmi K. A review of teaching methods-lecturing and Facilitation in Higher Education (HE): a Summary of the published evidence. J Effective Teach. 2012;12(3):61–76. Regmi K. A review of teaching methods-lecturing and Facilitation in Higher Education (HE): a Summary of the published evidence. J Effective Teach. 2012;12(3):61–76.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, Fink LD. Team based learning: a transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Stylus Publishing; 2004. Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, Fink LD. Team based learning: a transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Stylus Publishing; 2004.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hawkins DA. Team-based learning guide for faculty in health professional. AuthorHouse; 2014. Hawkins DA. Team-based learning guide for faculty in health professional. AuthorHouse; 2014.
Metadaten
Titel
Applying team-based learning combined with empathy map to improve self-directed learning skills
verfasst von
Miao-Chuan Chen
Mei-Chu Tsai
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02355-4