Background
Self-directed learning (SDL) is a crucial skill for upcoming graduates and is essential to nursing students’ professional development requirements [
1,
2]. Academic achievement, learning satisfaction, self-evaluations, and professional nursing values are more likely to improve for first-year nursing students with stronger SDL skills [
3,
4]. Therefore, appropriate teaching strategies should be implemented in educational settings to foster students’ learning responsibility and improve their SDL abilities. Team-based learning (TBL) has been prevalent in domestic and international professional healthcare education research for several years. Over 80% of these studies focused on the learning outcomes of students [
5]. TBL is used to teach students to be accountable for their own learning and to instill them with SDL skills. Research demonstrates that TBL effectively improves the problem-solving and SDL skills of nursing students [
6,
7], and its combination with flipped learning increases students’ engagement with lessons [
8]. Students who received TBL performed better academically and were able to retain their knowledge longer than those who received traditional learning [
9].
Knowles defined SDL as a process in which learners take the initiative and responsibility to identify their learning needs, goals, strategies, resources, and assessment methods, as well as having larger and more resolute motivations to apply what they’ve learned in their daily lives [
10]. Loeng characterized SDL as a multidimensional concept in which the learner controls the status of their own learning activities with minimal assistance from others. In other words, SDL requires learners to be proactive and accountable for their own learning [
11]. SDL should be viewed as a collaboration between teachers and students [
12], and teachers should be learning promoters rather than communicators [
11]. Lifelong learning is essential for developing responsible and autonomous nurses. Nurse preceptors should implement instructional strategies that foster SDL and lifelong learning skills in their students [
13]. However, under the traditional framework for instruction, nursing students continue to rely on instructors and are unable to engage in SDL. Dialogic learning should be utilized to help students reflect on and deepen their comprehension of their own values [
14].
Larry Michaelsen created team-based learning (TBL) in the late 1970s to facilitate small-group discussions in large classes. TBL improves students’ critical thinking, teamwork, and disciplinary knowledge comprehension and application [
15]. In TBL, students first complete a learning assignment and then take a test to evaluate their basic learning outcome. The purpose of this study is to improve their foundational knowledge and readiness for advanced group projects. During team assessments, students deliberate and reach a consensus. They can also ask questions to interact with their peers and teacher, enhancing their sense of responsibility toward their team and their ability to participate in group discussions and communication [
15]. TBL courses enhance the problem-solving abilities, SDL, and knowledge of nursing students [
7]. Following the implementation of TBL in a fundamentals of nursing course, Kim found that students’ learning attitudes, motivations, and problem-solving skills improved [
16]. A TBL course design also effectively improved the SDL skills of medical students [
6]. In a psychiatric nursing curriculum, Park and Park combined TBL and flipped learning [
8]. The results demonstrated that the students readily integrated diverse viewpoints through teamwork and were engaged in the lessons. The teacher acted as a facilitator who guided students to engage in SDL and enjoyable lesson immersion. Switching from teacher-centered to group-based learning activities increased the nursing students’ self-management, teamwork, and SDL skills [
17].
Dave Gray developed the empathy map to help designers overcome their egocentric tendencies by analyzing and considering the user’s perspective [
18]. By observing a user’s actual service experiences and opinions, this instrument enables designers to illustrate the needs of different customer groups [
19]. An empathy map helps a designer consider the viewpoint of another individual. It is utilized frequently in group-based design thinking but infrequently in medical education. The only instance was when Cairns et al. incorporated empathy maps into a medical student communication skills training program [
20]. The results revealed that the students’ perspectives on empathy and patient-centered care were influenced by empathy maps. Empathy maps are a cost-effective way to promote empathy and patient-centered care in medical education and other care-related professions.
Nurses must establish trustworthy nursing relationships with patients with mental disorders in order to gain an in-depth understanding of the patient’s inner world. Due to the lack of breadth and depth in their life experiences, it is difficult for nursing students to develop empathy, and traditional teaching approaches offer no assistance in meeting their needs in the affective component of learning [
21]. An empathy map is a tool that assists a person to understand the perspective of others, and is therefore feasible for preliminary case analysis or empathy training [
18]. And incorporating empathy into classroom instruction promotes teamwork and proactive collaboration among students [
19]. Attempting to switch from teacher-centered to group-based learning activities should not only increase the teamwork spirit of nursing students, but should also be quite effective in improving SDL skills. Therefore, this study applied a method combining team-based learning and empathy mapping in a psychiatric nursing course to examine its effectiveness in improving nursing students’ SDL skills and academic performance.
Discussion
Self-directed learners must be able to assess their individual learning needs, establish learning objectives, identify learning resources, select and implement appropriate learning strategies, and evaluate learning outcomes [
24]. This explains why the items “I know how to locate learning resources” (
p = .018) and “I am able to monitor my learning progress” (
p = .013) were statistically significant in this study. The combination of empathy mapping and TBL significantly facilitated students’ identification of learning resources and progress monitoring. Students are capable of managing their own learning scenarios and activities with minimal assistance from others [
11]. Responsibility for one’s own education is essential for lifelong learning. All of the “interpersonal communication” items were statistically significant, indicating that the combined empathy mapping-TBL approach enhanced the students’ interpersonal communication skills. In contrast to our findings, Lee and Park discovered that TBL improved nursing students’ problem-solving, SDL, and nursing knowledge, but had no effect on their communication skills [
7]. This difference may be explicable by the combination of empathy mapping utilized in this study. In this study, the use of the Socratic method in classroom debates, group discussions, peer collaboration, and question posing enhanced students’ communication and peer collaboration skills [
13].
This study incorporated TBL into classroom instruction. Numerous studies have demonstrated that TBL has significant and positive effects on students’ SDL skills [
6,
7,
16,
17,
24]. In this study, empathy mapping was incorporated into the third stage of the TBL instructional plan, and the results demonstrated that the experimental group improved their SDL skills more effectively than the control group. This finding can be attributed to the core concept of empathy mapping, which emphasizes understanding a patient’s emotions and sensing their problems and challenges. In doing so, students improved their SDL abilities. SDL is effective in developing a person’s competencies, attitudes, and literacy, as demonstrated by both research and practice. Through SDL, nursing students continuously develop their learning competencies and acquire the required expertise [
13]. Huh and Oh argued that identifying patients’ problems through direct nurse-patient interactions in clinical practice and providing the necessary education to the patient are essential for enhancing nursing students’ empathy, communication effectiveness, and SDL skills [
25]. However, for third-year nursing students who lack clinical experience, the combination of empathy mapping and TBL is an effective instructional technique for enhancing their SDL skills.
In addition, the experimental group significantly improved their academic performance compared to the control group, suggesting a correlation between better academic performance and a positive self-evaluation of SDL skills among nursing students [
4,
26]. Slater and Cusick discovered that the learning outcomes of first-year nursing students were correlated with their SDL skills, i.e., students with successful achievements had significantly higher SDL skills [
27]. This finding is consistent with Knowles’ hypothesis that active learners learn more efficiently and effectively than passive learners [
10]. Both empathy mapping and TBL are based on small group learning, indicating that a learning environment characterized by mutual support in small groups was conducive to the enhancement of students’ learning competencies [
1,
2].
Based on Grow’s staged SDL model, this course completed the first three stages of SDL and assisted students in completing the fourth stage independently [
28]. In Stage 1, students are teacher-dependent learners. Teachers should refrain from expressing their opinions, and learning topics, not students, should take precedence. Thus, the first step of TBL is to provide students with the opportunity to complete individual assessments based on the assigned instructional materials. In Stage 2, students appropriately direct their own learning, with teachers serving as guides and facilitators. As learners are generally uninformed about a topic, learning exchanges should be two-way so that students can share their responses and interests.
The second stage also includes small-group tests in which students pose and discuss questions with the instructor and their classmates, thereby enhancing their team responsibility and communication skills. Stage 3 of the SDL is the transitional phase. Teachers serve as facilitators to encourage student participation in seminars and small group discussions.
The incorporation of empathy mapping in Stage 3 enabled students to comprehend how the case thinks and feels based on what they see, say, do, and hear, and to develop appropriate caregiving strategies and professional decisions.
In Stage 4, students are highly self-directed and teachers are merely consultants who aid in the development of students’ learning skills. By establishing their own objectives and standards for learning, students willingly assume responsibility for their academic progress.
Conclusion
This study employed a combined TBL and empathy mapping teaching strategy that inverts traditional professional course learning models, allowing students to integrate the affective component of learning with their acquired knowledge. The results of the ANCOVA indicated that the experimental group improved their SDL skills significantly more than the control group. In other words, the combined TBL and empathy mapping instructional strategy significantly improved nursing students’ SDL skills.
Empathy prioritizes considering the viewpoints of others. Through empathy, the students were able to comprehend the true emotions and perspectives of a case, and their problem-solving initiative inspired them to study. Students of nursing who can accurately identify a patient’s opinions and emotions are better able to provide care-related recommendations that the patient requires and demonstrate professional nursing literacy. In this study, the combination of empathy mapping and TBL demonstrated that the introduction of empathy mapping significantly improved students’ SDL skills, thereby validating the approach’s applicability in contemporary professional nursing education settings.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.